CEUR workshop proceedings最新文献

Scientific collaborations involving multiple institutions are increasingly commonplace. It is not unusual for publications to have dozens or hundreds of authors, in some cases even a few thousands. Gathering the information for such papers may be very time consuming, since the author list must include authors who made different kinds of contributions and whose affiliations are hard to track. Similarly, when datasets are contributed by multiple institutions, the collection and processing details may also be hard to assemble due to the many individuals involved. We present our work to date on automatically generating author lists and other portions of scientific papers for multi-institutional collaborations based on the metadata created to represent the people, data, and activities involved. Our initial focus is ENIGMA, a large international collaboration for neuroimaging genetics.

The 2017 CLEF eRisk pilot task focuses on automatically detecting depression as early as possible from a users' posts to Reddit. In this paper we present the techniques employed for the University of Arizona team's participation in this early risk detection shared task. We leveraged external information beyond the small training set, including a preexisting depression lexicon and concepts from the Unified Medical Language System as features. For prediction, we used both sequential (recurrent neural network) and non-sequential (support vector machine) models. Our models perform decently on the test data, and the recurrent neural models perform better than the non-sequential support vector machines while using the same feature sets.

This paper reports on Task 2 of the 2016 CLEF eHealth evaluation lab which extended the previous information extraction tasks of ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation labs. The task continued with named entity recognition and normalization in French narratives, as offered in CLEF eHealth 2015. Named entity recognition involved ten types of entities including disorders that were defined according to Semantic Groups in the Unified Medical Language System^® (UMLS^®), which was also used for normalizing the entities. In addition, we introduced a large-scale classification task in French death certificates, which consisted of extracting causes of death as coded in the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD10). Participant systems were evaluated against a blind reference standard of 832 titles of scientific articles indexed in MEDLINE, 4 drug monographs published by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and 27,850 death certificates using Precision, Recall and F-measure. In total, seven teams participated, including five in the entity recognition and normalization task, and five in the death certificate coding task. Three teams submitted their systems to our newly offered reproducibility track. For entity recognition, the highest performance was achieved on the EMEA corpus, with an overall F-measure of 0.702 for plain entities recognition and 0.529 for normalized entity recognition. For entity normalization, the highest performance was achieved on the MEDLINE corpus, with an overall F-measure of 0.552. For death certificate coding, the highest performance was 0.848 F-measure.

Objectives: To identify missing hierarchical relations in SNOMED CT from logical definitions based on the lexical features of concept names.

Methods: We first create logical definitions from the lexical features of concept names, which we represent in OWL EL. We infer hierarchical (subClassOf) relations among these concepts using the ELK reasoner. Finally, we compare the hierarchy obtained from lexical features to the original SNOMED CT hierarchy. We review the differences manually for evaluation purposes.

Results: Applied to 15,833 disorder and procedure concepts, our approach identified 559 potentially missing hierarchical relations, of which 78% were deemed valid.

Conclusions: This lexical approach to quality assurance is easy to implement, efficient and scalable.

In this poster we present novel development and extension of the Drug-drug Interaction and Drug-drug Interaction Evidence Ontology (DIDEO). We demonstrate how reasoning over this extension of DIDEO can a) automatically create a multi-level hierarchy of evidence types from descriptions of the underlying scientific observations and b) automatically subsume individual evidence items under the correct evidence type. Thus DIDEO will enable evidence items added manually by curators to be automatically categorized into a drug-drug interaction framework with precision and minimal effort from curators. As with all previous DIDEO development this extension is consistent with OBO Foundry principles.

The Protein Ontology (PRO) defines protein classes and their interrelationships from the family to the protein form (proteoform) level within and across species. One of the unique contributions of PRO is its representation of post-translationally modified (PTM) proteoforms. However, progress in adding PTM proteoform classes to PRO has been relatively slow due to the extensive manual curation effort required. Here we report an automated pipeline for creation of PTM proteoform classes that leverages two phosphorylation-focused text mining tools (RLIMS-P, which detects mentions of kinases, substrates, and phosphorylation sites, and eFIP, which detects phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions (PPIs)) and our integrated PTM database, iPTMnet. By applying this pipeline, we obtained a set of ~820 substrate-site pairs that are suitable for automated PRO term generation with literature-based evidence attribution. Inclusion of these terms in PRO will increase PRO coverage of species-specific PTM proteoforms by 50%. Many of these new proteoforms also have associated kinase and/or PPI information. Finally, we show a phosphorylation network for the human and mouse peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PIN1/Pin1) derived from our dataset that demonstrates the biological complexity of the information we have extracted. Our approach addresses scalability in PRO curation and will be further expanded to advance PRO representation of phosphorylated proteoforms.

We describe an approach for performing qualitative, systems-level causal analyses on biosimulation models that leverages semantics-based modeling formats, formal ontology, and automated inference. The approach allows users to quickly investigate how a qualitative perturbation to an element within a model's network (an increment or decrement) propagates throughout the modeled system. To support such analyses, we must interpret and annotate the semantics of the models, including both the physical properties modeled and the dependencies that relate them. We build from prior work understanding the semantics of biological properties, but here, we focus on the semantics for dependencies, which provide the critical knowledge necessary for causal analysis of biosimulation models. We describe augmentations to the Ontology of Physics for Biology, via OWL axioms and SWRL rules, and demonstrate that a reasoner can then infer how an annotated model's physical properties influence each other in a qualitative sense. Our goal is to provide researchers with a tool that helps bring the systems-level network dynamics of biosimulation models into perspective, thus facilitating model development, testing, and application.

Organizational structures of healthcare organizations has increasingly become a focus of medical research. In the CAFÉ project we aim to provide a web-service enabling ontology-driven comparison of the organizational characteristics of trauma centers and trauma systems. Trauma remains one of the biggest challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Research has demonstrated that coordinated efforts like trauma systems and trauma centers are key components of addressing this challenge. Evaluation and comparison of these organizations is essential. However, this research challenge is frequently compounded by the lack of a shared terminology and the lack of effective information technology solutions for assessing and comparing these organizations. In this paper we present the Ontology of Organizational Structures of Trauma systems and Trauma centers (OOSTT) that provides the ontological foundation to CAFÉ's web-based questionnaire infrastructure. We present the usage of the ontology in relation to the questionnaire and provide the methods that were used to create the ontology.

We investigate the current extent of term reuse and overlap among biomedical ontologies. We use the corpus of biomedical ontologies stored in the BioPortal repository, and analyze three types of reuse constructs: (a) explicit term reuse, (b) xref reuse, and (c) Concept Unique Identifier (CUI) reuse. While there is a term label similarity of approximately 14.4% of the total terms, we observed that most ontologies reuse considerably fewer than 5% of their terms from a concise set of a few core ontologies. We developed an interactive visualization to explore reuse dependencies among biomedical ontologies. Moreover, we identified a set of patterns that indicate ontology developers did intend to reuse terms from other ontologies, but they were using different and sometimes incorrect representations. Our results suggest the value of semi-automated tools that augment term reuse in the ontology engineering process through personalized recommendations.