Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology最新文献

The RNA exosome was originally discovered in yeast as an RNA-processing complex required for the maturation of 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), one of the constituents of the large ribosomal subunit. The exosome is now known in eukaryotes as the major 3'-5' RNA degradation machine involved in numerous processing, turnover, and surveillance pathways, both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Yet its role in maturing the 5.8S rRNA in the pre-60S ribosomal particle remains probably the most intricate and emblematic among its functions, as it involves all the RNA unwinding, degradation, and trimming activities embedded in this macromolecular complex. Here, we propose a comprehensive mechanistic model, based on current biochemical and structural data, explaining the dual functions of the nuclear exosome-the constructive versus the destructive mode.

Heterochromatin is a classic context for studying the mechanisms of chromatin organization. At the core of a highly conserved type of heterochromatin is the complex formed between chromatin methylated on histone H3 lysine 9 and HP1 proteins. This type of heterochromatin plays central roles in gene repression, genome stability, and nuclear mechanics. Systematic studies over the last several decades have provided insight into the biophysical mechanisms by which the HP1-chromatin complex is formed. Here, we discuss these studies together with recent findings indicating a role for phase separation in heterochromatin organization and function. We suggest that the different functions of HP1-mediated heterochromatin may rely on the increasing diversity being uncovered in the biophysical properties of HP1-chromatin complexes.

The polyadenosine (poly(A)) tail, which is found on the 3' end of almost all eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs), plays an important role in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Shortening of the poly(A) tail, a process known as deadenylation, is thought to be the first and rate-limiting step of mRNA turnover. Deadenylation is performed by the Pan2-Pan3 and Ccr4-Not complexes that contain highly conserved exonuclease enzymes Pan2, and Ccr4 and Caf1, respectively. These complexes have been extensively studied, but the mechanisms of how the deadenylase enzymes recognize the poly(A) tail were poorly understood until recently. Here, we summarize recent work from our laboratory demonstrating that the highly conserved Pan2 exonuclease recognizes the poly(A) tail, not through adenine-specific functional groups, but through the conformation of poly(A) RNA. Our biochemical, biophysical, and structural investigations suggest that poly(A) forms an intrinsic base-stacked, single-stranded helical conformation that is recognized by Pan2, and that disruption of this structure inhibits both Pan2 and Caf1. This intrinsic structure has been shown to be important in poly(A) recognition in other biological processes, further underlining the importance of the unique conformation of poly(A).

It is now clear that cells form a wide collection of large RNA-protein assemblies, referred to as RNP granules. RNP granules exist in bacterial cells and can be found in both the cytosol and nucleus of eukaryotic cells. Recent approaches have begun to define the RNA and protein composition of a number of RNP granules. Herein, we review the composition and assembly of RNP granules, as well as how RNPs are targeted to RNP granules using stress granules and P-bodies as model systems. Taken together, these reveal that RNP granules form through the summative effects of a combination of protein-protein, protein-RNA, and RNA-RNA interactions. Similarly, the partitioning of individual RNPs into stress granules is determined by the combinatorial effects of multiple elements. Thus, RNP granules are assemblies generally dominated by combinatorial effects, thereby providing rich opportunities for biological regulation.

Telescripting is a fundamental cotranscriptional gene regulation process that relies on U1 snRNP (U1) to suppress premature 3'-end cleavage and polyadenylation (PCPA) in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcripts, which is necessary for full-length transcription of thousands of protein-coding (pre-mRNAs) and long noncoding (lncRNA) genes. Like U1 role in splicing, telescripting requires U1 snRNA base-pairing with nascent transcripts. Inhibition of U1 base-pairing with U1 snRNA antisense morpholino oligonucleotide (U1 AMO) mimics widespread PCPA from cryptic polyadenylation signals (PASs) in human tissues, including PCPA in introns and last exons' 3'-untranslated regions (3' UTRs). U1 telescripting-PCPA balance changes generate diverse RNAs depending on where in a gene it occurs. Long genes are highly U1-telescripting-dependent because of PASs in introns compared to short genes. Enrichment of cell cycle control, differentiation, and developmental functions in long genes, compared to housekeeping and acute cell stress response genes in short genes, reveals a gene size-function relationship in mammalian genomes. This polarization increased in metazoan evolution by previously unexplained intron expansion, suggesting that U1 telescripting could shift global gene expression priorities. We show that that modulating U1 availability can profoundly alter cell phenotype, such as cancer cell migration and invasion, underscoring the critical role of U1 homeostasis and suggesting it as a potential target for therapies. We describe a complex of U1 with cleavage and polyadenylation factors that silences PASs in introns and 3' UTR, which gives insights into U1 telescripting mechanism and transcription elongation regulation.

Eukaryotic genomes are known to prevalently transcribe diverse classes of RNAs, virtually all of which, including nascent RNAs from protein-coding genes, are now recognized to have regulatory functions in gene expression, suggesting that RNAs are both the products and the regulators of gene expression. Their functions must enlist specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to execute their regulatory activities, and recent evidence suggests that nearly all biochemically defined chromatin regions in the human genome, whether defined for gene activation or silencing, have the involvement of specific RBPs. Interestingly, the boundary between RNA- and DNA-binding proteins is also melting, as many DNA-binding proteins traditionally studied in the context of transcription are able to bind RNAs, some of which may simultaneously bind both DNA and RNA to facilitate network interactions in three-dimensional (3D) genome. In this review, we focus on RBPs that function at chromatin levels, with particular emphasis on their mechanisms of action in regulated gene expression, which is intended to facilitate future functional and mechanistic dissection of chromatin-associated RBPs.

Different proteins associate with the nascent RNA and the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to catalyze the transcription cycle and RNA export. If these processes are not properly controlled, the nascent RNA can thread back and hybridize to the DNA template forming R-loops capable of stalling replication, leading to DNA breaks. Given the transcriptional promiscuity of the genome, which leads to large amounts of RNAs from mRNAs to different types of ncRNAs, these can become a major threat to genome integrity if they form R-loops. Consequently, cells have evolved nuclear factors to prevent this phenomenon that includes THO, a conserved eukaryotic complex acting in transcription elongation and RNA processing and export that upon inactivation causes genome instability linked to R-loop accumulation. We revise and discuss here the biological relevance of THO and a number of RNA helicases, including the THO partner UAP56/DDX39B, as a paradigm of the cellular mechanisms of cotranscriptional R-loop prevention.