首页 > 最新文献

Critical care science最新文献

英文 中文
Fluid management in sepsis: 5 reasons why less fluid might be more rational. 败血症的输液管理:少输液可能更合理的 5 个原因。
Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240111-en
Thiago Masashi Taniguchi, Leandro Utino Taniguchi
{"title":"Fluid management in sepsis: 5 reasons why less fluid might be more rational.","authors":"Thiago Masashi Taniguchi, Leandro Utino Taniguchi","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240111-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240111-en","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463987/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Respiratory mechanics characteristics at the time of barotrauma presentation in patients with critical COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 重症感染患者出现气压创伤时的呼吸力学特征。
Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240248-en
Gabriela Vieira Steckert, Sophia Andreola Borba, Gabriela Meirelles Marchese, Fabrício Schultz Medeiros, Tiago Severo Garcia, Marcio Manozzo Boniatti, Iuri Christmann Wawrzeniak

Objective: To evaluate how ventilatory support, the duration of invasive ventilatory support use and lung mechanics are related to barotrauma development in patients who are severely infected with COVID-19 and who are admitted to the intensive care unit and develop pulmonary barotrauma.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who were severely infected with COVID-19 and who developed pulmonary barotrauma secondary to mechanical ventilation.

Results: This study included 60 patients with lung barotrauma who were divided into two groups: 37 with early barotrauma and 23 with late barotrauma. The early barotrauma group included more individuals who needed noninvasive ventilation (62.2% versus 26.1%, p = 0.01). The tidal volume/kg of predicted body weight on the day of barotrauma was measured, and 24 hours later, it was significantly greater in the late barotrauma group than in the early barotrauma group. During the day, barotrauma was accompanied by plateau pressure and driving pressure accompanied by tidal volume, which significantly increased in the late barotrauma group. According to the SAPS 3, patients in the early barotrauma group had more pulmonary thromboembolism and more severe illness. However, the intensive care unit mortality rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (66.7% for early barotrauma versus 76.9% for late barotrauma).

Conclusion: We investigated the effect of respiratory mechanics on barotrauma in patients with severe COVID-19 and found that 25% of patients were on nonprotective ventilation parameters when they developed barotrauma. However, 50% of patients were on protective ventilation parameters, suggesting that other nonventilatory factors may contribute to barotrauma.

目的评估严重感染 COVID-19、入住重症监护室并出现肺气压创伤的患者的通气支持、有创通气支持持续时间和肺力学与肺气压创伤的关系:方法:对严重感染 COVID-19、因机械通气导致肺气压创伤的患者进行回顾性队列研究:该研究包括60名肺气压创伤患者,他们被分为两组:37名早期气压创伤患者和23名晚期气压创伤患者。早期气压创伤组中需要无创通气的患者更多(62.2% 对 26.1%,P = 0.01)。在气压创伤当天测量潮气量/公斤预测体重,24 小时后,晚期气压创伤组的潮气量明显高于早期气压创伤组。在白天,气压创伤伴有高原压和驱动压,同时伴有潮气量,晚期气压创伤组的潮气量明显增加。根据 SAPS 3,早期气压创伤组患者的肺血栓栓塞发生率更高,病情更严重。然而,两组患者在重症监护室的死亡率并无明显差异(早期气压创伤组为66.7%,晚期气压创伤组为76.9%):我们研究了呼吸力学对重症 COVID-19 患者气压创伤的影响,发现 25% 的患者在发生气压创伤时使用的是非保护性通气参数。然而,50% 的患者使用的是保护性通气参数,这表明其他非通气因素也可能导致气压创伤。
{"title":"Respiratory mechanics characteristics at the time of barotrauma presentation in patients with critical COVID-19 infection.","authors":"Gabriela Vieira Steckert, Sophia Andreola Borba, Gabriela Meirelles Marchese, Fabrício Schultz Medeiros, Tiago Severo Garcia, Marcio Manozzo Boniatti, Iuri Christmann Wawrzeniak","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240248-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240248-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how ventilatory support, the duration of invasive ventilatory support use and lung mechanics are related to barotrauma development in patients who are severely infected with COVID-19 and who are admitted to the intensive care unit and develop pulmonary barotrauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of patients who were severely infected with COVID-19 and who developed pulmonary barotrauma secondary to mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 60 patients with lung barotrauma who were divided into two groups: 37 with early barotrauma and 23 with late barotrauma. The early barotrauma group included more individuals who needed noninvasive ventilation (62.2% versus 26.1%, p = 0.01). The tidal volume/kg of predicted body weight on the day of barotrauma was measured, and 24 hours later, it was significantly greater in the late barotrauma group than in the early barotrauma group. During the day, barotrauma was accompanied by plateau pressure and driving pressure accompanied by tidal volume, which significantly increased in the late barotrauma group. According to the SAPS 3, patients in the early barotrauma group had more pulmonary thromboembolism and more severe illness. However, the intensive care unit mortality rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (66.7% for early barotrauma versus 76.9% for late barotrauma).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We investigated the effect of respiratory mechanics on barotrauma in patients with severe COVID-19 and found that 25% of patients were on nonprotective ventilation parameters when they developed barotrauma. However, 50% of patients were on protective ventilation parameters, suggesting that other nonventilatory factors may contribute to barotrauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463995/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation): protocol for a multicenter randomized open-label trial of watchful waiting versus antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. VATICAN(呼吸机相关气管支气管炎抗生素评估倡议):针对呼吸机相关气管支气管炎的观察等待与抗菌治疗的多中心随机开放标签试验方案。
Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en
Bruno Martins Tomazini, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Camila Dietrich, Ana Paula Rossi Gandara, Debora Patrícia Silva, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, Mariane Nascimento Luz, Renata Rodrigues de Mattos, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis, Roberta Muriel Longo Roepke, Carlos Sérgio Luna Gomes Duarte, Antônio Paulo Nassar Júnior, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Beatriz Arns, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Adriano José Pereira, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo

Background: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation.

Methods: VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework.

Conclusion: The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.

背景:呼吸机相关气管支气管炎是重症监护病房有创通气患者的常见病,目前尚不清楚最佳治疗策略。我们设计了 VATICAN(呼吸机相关气管支气管炎抗生素评估倡议)试验,以评估在无机械通气天数方面,观察等待抗生素治疗策略是否不劣于常规抗生素治疗呼吸机相关气管支气管炎:VATICAN 是一项随机对照、开放标签、多中心非劣效性试验。疑似呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎但无呼吸机相关性肺炎证据或因可能感染导致血流动力学不稳定的患者将被分配到观察等待策略(不对呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎使用抗菌药物,仅在呼吸机相关性肺炎、败血症或脓毒性休克或其他感染性诊断病例中使用抗菌药物)或常规抗菌药物治疗策略(7 天)中。主要结果是 28 天内无机械通气天数,次要结果是无呼吸机相关性肺炎存活率。通过意向治疗框架和每方案敏感性分析,主要结果分析将以20%的差值(即无呼吸机天数相差1.5天)进行非劣效性分析。其他分析将遵循优效性分析框架:VATICAN试验将遵循所有国家和国际伦理标准。我们的目标是在知名度较高的综合性期刊上发表试验结果,并在重症监护和传染病会议上进行宣传。试验完成后,这些结果可能会立即应用于床边治疗,并为指南制定提供低偏倚风险的信息。
{"title":"VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation): protocol for a multicenter randomized open-label trial of watchful waiting versus antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.","authors":"Bruno Martins Tomazini, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Camila Dietrich, Ana Paula Rossi Gandara, Debora Patrícia Silva, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, Mariane Nascimento Luz, Renata Rodrigues de Mattos, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis, Roberta Muriel Longo Roepke, Carlos Sérgio Luna Gomes Duarte, Antônio Paulo Nassar Júnior, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Beatriz Arns, Giovanna Marssola Nascimento, Adriano José Pereira, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240029-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a common condition among invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units, for which the best treatment strategy is currently unknown. We designed the VATICAN (Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis Initiative to Conduct Antibiotic Evaluation) trial to assess whether a watchful waiting antibiotic treatment strategy is noninferior to routine antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis regarding days free of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VATICAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter noninferiority trial. Patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis without evidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia or hemodynamic instability due to probable infection will be assigned to either a watchful waiting strategy, without antimicrobial administration for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and prescription of antimicrobials only in cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or another infectious diagnosis, or to a routine antimicrobial treatment strategy for seven days. The primary outcome will be mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, and a key secondary outcome will be ventilator-associated pneumonia-free survival. Through an intention-to-treat framework with a per-protocol sensitivity analysis, the primary outcome analysis will address noninferiority with a 20% margin, which translates to a 1.5 difference in ventilator-free days. Other analyses will follow a superiority analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VATICAN trial will follow all national and international ethical standards. We aim to publish the trial in a high-visibility general journal and present it at critical care and infectious disease conferences for dissemination. These results will likely be immediately applicable to the bedside upon trial completion and will provide information with a low risk of bias for guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of postinfarction cardiogenic shock: is it the end, or do we need to select patients better? 静脉体外膜氧合治疗梗死后心源性休克:是终结,还是我们需要更好地选择患者?
Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240041-en
Livia Maria Garcia Melro, Marcelo Park, Pedro Vitale Mendes
{"title":"Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of postinfarction cardiogenic shock: is it the end, or do we need to select patients better?","authors":"Livia Maria Garcia Melro, Marcelo Park, Pedro Vitale Mendes","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240041-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240041-en","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321715/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical trajectories of critically ill patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility: retrospective cohort. 从重症监护室直接出院到后期护理机构的重症患者的临床轨迹:回顾性队列。
Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240015-en
João Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Milton José de Souza Neto, Alef Santiago Rezende, Flavia Dos Santos Ferreira, Yanne Danielly Santos Amorim, Flaviane Ribeiro de Souza, Lucas Freire de Andrade

Objective: To describe the clinical trajectories of patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were transferred from an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit to a postacute care facility between July 2017 and April 2023. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure score.

Results: A total of 847 patients were included in the study, and the mean age was 71 years. A total of 692 (82%) patients were admitted for rehabilitation, while 155 (18%) were admitted for palliative care. The mean length of stay in the postacute care facility was 36 days; 389 (45.9%) patients were discharged home, 173 (20.4%) were transferred to an acute hospital, and 285 (33.6%) died during hospitalization, of whom 263 (92%) had a do-not-resuscitate order. Of the patients admitted for rehabilitation purposes, 61 (9.4%) had a worsened functional status, 179 (27.6%) had no change in functional status, and 469 (63%) had an improved functional status during hospitalization. Moreover, 234 (33.8%) patients modified their care goals to palliative care, most of whom were in the group that did not improve functional status. Patients whose functional status improved during hospitalization were younger, had fewer comorbidities, had fewer previous hospitalizations, had lower rates of enteral feeding and tracheostomy, had higher Functional Independence Measure scores at admission to the postacute care facility and were more likely to be discharged home with less complex health care assistance.

Conclusion: Postacute care facilities may play a role in the care of patients after discharge from intensive care units, both for those receiving rehabilitation and palliative care, especially for those with more severe illnesses who may not be discharged directly home.

摘要描述从重症监护室直接出院到后期护理机构的患者的临床轨迹:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2017年7月至2023年4月期间从重症监护病房或中级监护病房转入后期护理机构的患者。功能状况通过功能独立性测量评分来衡量:共有847名患者参与研究,平均年龄为71岁。共有 692 名(82%)患者因康复而入院,155 名(18%)患者因姑息治疗而入院。急性期后护理机构的平均住院时间为 36 天;389 名(45.9%)患者出院回家,173 名(20.4%)患者转入急症医院,285 名(33.6%)患者在住院期间死亡,其中 263 名(92%)患者有禁止复苏令。在以康复为目的入院的患者中,61 人(9.4%)的功能状况恶化,179 人(27.6%)的功能状况无变化,469 人(63%)的功能状况在住院期间有所改善。此外,有 234 名(33.8%)患者将护理目标改为姑息治疗,其中大部分患者属于功能状态未改善的组别。住院期间功能状况得到改善的患者年龄较轻、合并症较少、既往住院次数较少、使用肠内喂养和气管造口术的比例较低、入院时的功能独立性测量评分较高,而且更有可能在不太复杂的医疗协助下出院回家:急性期后护理机构在重症监护病房病人出院后的护理中可以发挥作用,无论是对接受康复治疗还是姑息治疗的病人,尤其是那些病情较重、可能无法直接出院回家的病人。
{"title":"Clinical trajectories of critically ill patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility: retrospective cohort.","authors":"João Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Milton José de Souza Neto, Alef Santiago Rezende, Flavia Dos Santos Ferreira, Yanne Danielly Santos Amorim, Flaviane Ribeiro de Souza, Lucas Freire de Andrade","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240015-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240015-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical trajectories of patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were transferred from an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit to a postacute care facility between July 2017 and April 2023. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 847 patients were included in the study, and the mean age was 71 years. A total of 692 (82%) patients were admitted for rehabilitation, while 155 (18%) were admitted for palliative care. The mean length of stay in the postacute care facility was 36 days; 389 (45.9%) patients were discharged home, 173 (20.4%) were transferred to an acute hospital, and 285 (33.6%) died during hospitalization, of whom 263 (92%) had a do-not-resuscitate order. Of the patients admitted for rehabilitation purposes, 61 (9.4%) had a worsened functional status, 179 (27.6%) had no change in functional status, and 469 (63%) had an improved functional status during hospitalization. Moreover, 234 (33.8%) patients modified their care goals to palliative care, most of whom were in the group that did not improve functional status. Patients whose functional status improved during hospitalization were younger, had fewer comorbidities, had fewer previous hospitalizations, had lower rates of enteral feeding and tracheostomy, had higher Functional Independence Measure scores at admission to the postacute care facility and were more likely to be discharged home with less complex health care assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postacute care facilities may play a role in the care of patients after discharge from intensive care units, both for those receiving rehabilitation and palliative care, especially for those with more severe illnesses who may not be discharged directly home.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From critical care units to postacute care facilities: the sooner, the better? 从重症监护室到后期护理机构:越快越好?
Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240145-en
Dimitri Gusmao-Flores, Bruna Brandão Barreto, Regis Goulart Rosa
{"title":"From critical care units to postacute care facilities: the sooner, the better?","authors":"Dimitri Gusmao-Flores, Bruna Brandão Barreto, Regis Goulart Rosa","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240145-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240145-en","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463977/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to low tidal volume in the transition to spontaneous ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure in intensive care units in Latin America (SPIRAL): a study protocol. 拉丁美洲重症监护病房急性呼吸衰竭患者在转为自主通气过程中坚持使用低潮气量(SPIRAL):研究方案。
Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240044-en
Fabia Diniz-Silva, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Luis Felipe Reyes, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Belinda Figueredo, Fernando Rios, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Gabriel Preda, Guillermo Bugedo, Israel Silva Maia, Leda Tomiko Yamada da Silveira, Luis Herrera, Manuel Jibaja, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Mino Cestari, Nicolás Nin, Rollin Roldan, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Alejandro Bruhn, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira

Objective: Patients with acute respiratory failure often require mechanical ventilation to reduce the work of breathing and improve gas exchange; however, this may exacerbate lung injury. Protective ventilation strategies, characterized by low tidal volumes (≤ 8mL/kg of predicted body weight) and limited plateau pressure below 30cmH2O, have shown improved outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, in the transition to spontaneous ventilation, it can be challenging to maintain tidal volume within protective levels, and it is unclear whether low tidal volumes during spontaneous ventilation impact patient outcomes. We developed a study protocol to estimate the prevalence of low tidal volume ventilation in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure and its association with ventilator-free days and survival.

Methods: We designed a multicenter, multinational, cohort study with a 28-day follow-up that will include patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as a partial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 300mmHg, in transition to spontaneous ventilation in intensive care units in Latin America.

Results: We plan to include 422 patients in ten countries. The primary outcomes are the prevalence of low tidal volume in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation and ventilator-free days on day 28. The secondary outcomes are intensive care unit and hospital mortality, incidence of asynchrony and return to controlled ventilation and sedation.

Conclusion: In this study, we will assess the prevalence of low tidal volume during spontaneous ventilation and its association with clinical outcomes, which can inform clinical practice and future clinical trials.

目的:急性呼吸衰竭患者通常需要机械通气来减少呼吸功和改善气体交换,但这可能会加重肺损伤。保护性通气策略的特点是低潮气量(≤ 8 毫升/千克预测体重)和将高原压限制在 30cmH2O 以下,这些策略已显示可改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的预后。然而,在向自主通气过渡的过程中,将潮气量维持在保护水平内可能具有挑战性,而且目前还不清楚自主通气期间的低潮气量是否会影响患者的预后。我们制定了一项研究方案,以估计低氧血症急性呼吸衰竭患者在自主通气的头 24 小时内低潮气量通气的发生率及其与无呼吸机天数和存活率的关系:我们设计了一项为期 28 天的多中心、跨国队列研究,研究对象包括拉丁美洲重症监护病房中转入自主通气的急性呼吸衰竭患者(定义为氧分压/吸入氧分压比值小于 300 mmHg):我们计划将十个国家的 422 名患者纳入研究范围。主要结果是自主通气最初 24 小时内低潮气量的发生率和第 28 天无呼吸机天数。次要结果是重症监护室和医院死亡率、异步发生率以及恢复控制通气和镇静:在这项研究中,我们将评估自主通气期间低潮气量的发生率及其与临床结果的关系,这将为临床实践和未来的临床试验提供参考。
{"title":"Adherence to low tidal volume in the transition to spontaneous ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure in intensive care units in Latin America (SPIRAL): a study protocol.","authors":"Fabia Diniz-Silva, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Luis Felipe Reyes, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Belinda Figueredo, Fernando Rios, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Gabriel Preda, Guillermo Bugedo, Israel Silva Maia, Leda Tomiko Yamada da Silveira, Luis Herrera, Manuel Jibaja, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Mino Cestari, Nicolás Nin, Rollin Roldan, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Alejandro Bruhn, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240044-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240044-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with acute respiratory failure often require mechanical ventilation to reduce the work of breathing and improve gas exchange; however, this may exacerbate lung injury. Protective ventilation strategies, characterized by low tidal volumes (≤ 8mL/kg of predicted body weight) and limited plateau pressure below 30cmH2O, have shown improved outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, in the transition to spontaneous ventilation, it can be challenging to maintain tidal volume within protective levels, and it is unclear whether low tidal volumes during spontaneous ventilation impact patient outcomes. We developed a study protocol to estimate the prevalence of low tidal volume ventilation in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure and its association with ventilator-free days and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a multicenter, multinational, cohort study with a 28-day follow-up that will include patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as a partial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 300mmHg, in transition to spontaneous ventilation in intensive care units in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We plan to include 422 patients in ten countries. The primary outcomes are the prevalence of low tidal volume in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation and ventilator-free days on day 28. The secondary outcomes are intensive care unit and hospital mortality, incidence of asynchrony and return to controlled ventilation and sedation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we will assess the prevalence of low tidal volume during spontaneous ventilation and its association with clinical outcomes, which can inform clinical practice and future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identification of distinct phenotypes and improving prognosis using metabolic biomarkers in COVID-19 patients. 利用 COVID-19 患者的代谢生物标记物识别不同表型并改善预后。
Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240028-en
Andressa Santana, Gabriele da Silveira Prestes, Marinara Dagostin da Silva, Carolina Saibro Girardi, Lucas Dos Santos Silva, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira, Daniel Pens Gelain, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Emil Kupek, Roger Walz, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Cristiane Ritter

Objective: To investigate the relationship between the levels of adipokines and other endocrine biomarkers and patient outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Methods: In a prospective study that included 213 subjects with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit, we measured the levels of cortisol, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, insulin, peptide YY, ghrelin, leptin, and resistin.; their contributions to patient clustering, disease severity, and predicting in-hospital mortality were analyzed.

Results: Cortisol, resistin, leptin, insulin, and ghrelin levels significantly differed between severity groups, as defined by the World Health Organization severity scale. Additionally, lower ghrelin and higher cortisol levels were associated with mortality. Adding biomarkers to the clinical predictors of mortality significantly improved accuracy in determining prognosis. Phenotyping of subjects based on plasma biomarker levels yielded two different phenotypes that were associated with disease severity, but not mortality.

Conclusion: As a single biomarker, only cortisol was independently associated with mortality; however, metabolic biomarkers could improve mortality prediction when added to clinical parameters. Metabolic biomarker phenotypes were differentially distributed according to COVID-19 severity but were not associated with mortality.

目的研究COVID-19住院患者的脂肪因子和其他内分泌生物标志物水平与患者预后之间的关系:在一项纳入 213 名入住重症监护室的 COVID-19 患者的前瞻性研究中,我们测量了皮质醇、C 肽、胰高血糖素样肽-1、胰岛素、YY 肽、胃泌素、瘦素和抵抗素的水平;分析了它们对患者分组、疾病严重程度和预测院内死亡率的贡献:结果:皮质醇、抵抗素、瘦素、胰岛素和胃泌素水平在世界卫生组织严重程度量表定义的严重程度组之间存在显著差异。此外,较低的胃泌素水平和较高的皮质醇水平与死亡率有关。在死亡率的临床预测指标中加入生物标志物,大大提高了判断预后的准确性。根据血浆生物标志物水平对受试者进行表型分析,得出了两种不同的表型,它们与疾病的严重程度有关,但与死亡率无关:结论:作为一种单一的生物标志物,只有皮质醇与死亡率有独立的关联;但是,如果将代谢生物标志物与临床参数相结合,则可以提高死亡率预测能力。代谢生物标志物表型根据COVID-19的严重程度呈不同分布,但与死亡率无关。
{"title":"Identification of distinct phenotypes and improving prognosis using metabolic biomarkers in COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Andressa Santana, Gabriele da Silveira Prestes, Marinara Dagostin da Silva, Carolina Saibro Girardi, Lucas Dos Santos Silva, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira, Daniel Pens Gelain, Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Emil Kupek, Roger Walz, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Cristiane Ritter","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240028-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240028-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship between the levels of adipokines and other endocrine biomarkers and patient outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study that included 213 subjects with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit, we measured the levels of cortisol, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, insulin, peptide YY, ghrelin, leptin, and resistin.; their contributions to patient clustering, disease severity, and predicting in-hospital mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cortisol, resistin, leptin, insulin, and ghrelin levels significantly differed between severity groups, as defined by the World Health Organization severity scale. Additionally, lower ghrelin and higher cortisol levels were associated with mortality. Adding biomarkers to the clinical predictors of mortality significantly improved accuracy in determining prognosis. Phenotyping of subjects based on plasma biomarker levels yielded two different phenotypes that were associated with disease severity, but not mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a single biomarker, only cortisol was independently associated with mortality; however, metabolic biomarkers could improve mortality prediction when added to clinical parameters. Metabolic biomarker phenotypes were differentially distributed according to COVID-19 severity but were not associated with mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141899097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. COVID-19重症患者在重症监护室获得的虚弱临床结局。前瞻性队列研究。
Pub Date : 2024-07-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240003-en
Alessandra Preisig Werlang, Viviane Martins Correa Boniatti, Carolina Tarantino Neuenfeldt, Luciana Carcuchinski da Silva, Gabriela Machado Costa, Michelle Carneiro Teixeira, Wagner Luis Nedel
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Alessandra Preisig Werlang, Viviane Martins Correa Boniatti, Carolina Tarantino Neuenfeldt, Luciana Carcuchinski da Silva, Gabriela Machado Costa, Michelle Carneiro Teixeira, Wagner Luis Nedel","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240003-en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240003-en","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141565287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors associated with carbon dioxide transfer in an experimental model of severe acute kidney injury and hypoventilation during high bicarbonate continuous renal replacement therapy and oxygenation membrane support. 高碳酸氢盐持续肾脏替代疗法和氧合膜支持期间严重急性肾损伤和低通气实验模型中二氧化碳转移的相关因素。
Pub Date : 2024-07-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240005-en
Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa Dos Santos, Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Junior, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Marcelo Park

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing carbon dioxide transfer in a system that integrates an oxygenation membrane in series with high-bicarbonate continuous veno-venous hemodialysis in hypercapnic animals.

Methods: In an experimental setting, we induced severe acute kidney injury and hypercapnia in five female Landrace pigs. Subsequently, we initiated high (40mEq/L) bicarbonate continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with an oxygenation membrane in series to maintain a pH above 7.25. At intervals of 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours following the initiation of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis, we performed standardized sweep gas flow titration to quantify carbon dioxide transfer. We evaluated factors associated with carbon dioxide transfer through the membrane lung with a mixed linear model.

Results: A total of 20 sweep gas flow titration procedures were conducted, yielding 84 measurements of carbon dioxide transfer. Multivariate analysis revealed associations among the following (coefficients ± standard errors): core temperature (+7.8 ± 1.6 °C, p < 0.001), premembrane partial pressure of carbon dioxide (+0.2 ± 0.1/mmHg, p < 0.001), hemoglobin level (+3.5 ± 0.6/g/dL, p < 0.001), sweep gas flow (+6.2 ± 0.2/L/minute, p < 0.001), and arterial oxygen saturation (-0.5 ± 0.2%, p = 0.019). Among these variables, and within the physiological ranges evaluated, sweep gas flow was the primary modifiable factor influencing the efficacy of low-blood-flow carbon dioxide removal.

Conclusion: Sweep gas flow is the main carbon dioxide removal-related variable during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with a high bicarbonate level coupled with an oxygenator. Other carbon dioxide transfer modulating variables included the hemoglobin level, arterial oxygen saturation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and core temperature. These results should be interpreted as exploratory to inform other well-designed experimental or clinical studies.

目的:研究影响高碳酸血症动物体内二氧化碳转移的因素:在高碳酸血症动物体内,研究在一个将充氧膜与高碳酸连续静脉血液透析串联在一起的系统中二氧化碳转移的影响因素:在实验环境中,我们诱导五头雌性兰德瑞斯猪出现严重急性肾损伤和高碳酸血症。随后,我们启动了高浓度(40mEq/L)碳酸氢盐连续静脉血液透析,并串联氧合膜以维持 pH 值高于 7.25。在开始连续静脉血液透析后的 1 小时、6 小时和 12 小时,我们分别进行了标准化扫气流量滴定,以量化二氧化碳的转移。我们采用混合线性模型评估了二氧化碳通过膜肺转移的相关因素:结果:共进行了 20 次扫气流量滴定过程,测量了 84 次二氧化碳转移。多变量分析显示以下因素之间存在关联(系数 ± 标准误差):核心体温(+7.8 ± 1.6 °C,p < 0.001)、膜前二氧化碳分压(+0.2±0.1/mmHg,p < 0.001)、血红蛋白水平(+3.5±0.6/g/dL,p < 0.001)、扫气流量(+6.2±0.2/L/分钟,p < 0.001)和动脉血氧饱和度(-0.5±0.2%,p = 0.019)。在这些变量中,在评估的生理范围内,扫气流量是影响低血流二氧化碳清除效果的主要可调节因素:结论:在使用高碳酸氢盐水平和氧合器的连续静脉血液透析过程中,扫气流量是与二氧化碳清除相关的主要变量。其他二氧化碳转移调节变量包括血红蛋白水平、动脉血氧饱和度、二氧化碳分压和核心体温。这些结果应被解释为探索性的,为其他精心设计的实验或临床研究提供参考。
{"title":"Factors associated with carbon dioxide transfer in an experimental model of severe acute kidney injury and hypoventilation during high bicarbonate continuous renal replacement therapy and oxygenation membrane support.","authors":"Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa Dos Santos, Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Junior, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Marcelo Park","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240005-en","DOIUrl":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240005-en","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors influencing carbon dioxide transfer in a system that integrates an oxygenation membrane in series with high-bicarbonate continuous veno-venous hemodialysis in hypercapnic animals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an experimental setting, we induced severe acute kidney injury and hypercapnia in five female Landrace pigs. Subsequently, we initiated high (40mEq/L) bicarbonate continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with an oxygenation membrane in series to maintain a pH above 7.25. At intervals of 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours following the initiation of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis, we performed standardized sweep gas flow titration to quantify carbon dioxide transfer. We evaluated factors associated with carbon dioxide transfer through the membrane lung with a mixed linear model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 sweep gas flow titration procedures were conducted, yielding 84 measurements of carbon dioxide transfer. Multivariate analysis revealed associations among the following (coefficients ± standard errors): core temperature (+7.8 ± 1.6 °C, p < 0.001), premembrane partial pressure of carbon dioxide (+0.2 ± 0.1/mmHg, p < 0.001), hemoglobin level (+3.5 ± 0.6/g/dL, p < 0.001), sweep gas flow (+6.2 ± 0.2/L/minute, p < 0.001), and arterial oxygen saturation (-0.5 ± 0.2%, p = 0.019). Among these variables, and within the physiological ranges evaluated, sweep gas flow was the primary modifiable factor influencing the efficacy of low-blood-flow carbon dioxide removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sweep gas flow is the main carbon dioxide removal-related variable during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with a high bicarbonate level coupled with an oxygenator. Other carbon dioxide transfer modulating variables included the hemoglobin level, arterial oxygen saturation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and core temperature. These results should be interpreted as exploratory to inform other well-designed experimental or clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208041/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141565288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical care science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1