Advances In Anatomic Pathology最新文献

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare tumor arising from the mesothelial cells that line the pleura, pericardium, peritoneum, and tunica vaginalis. Imaging plays a primary role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of malignant mesothelioma. Multimodality imaging, including radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT), is used in a variety of scenarios, including diagnosis, guidance for tissue sampling, staging, and reassessment of disease after therapy. CT is the primary imaging modality used in staging. MRI has superior contrast resolution compared with CT and can add value in terms of determining surgical resectability in equivocal cases. MRI can further assess the degree of local invasion, particularly into the mediastinum, chest wall, and diaphragm, for malignant pleural and pericardial mesotheliomas. FDG PET/CT plays a role in the diagnosis and staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and has been shown to be more accurate than CT, MRI, and PET alone in the staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. PET/CT can also be used to target lesions for biopsy and to assess prognosis, treatment response, and tumor recurrence.

Common well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions include focal nodular hyperplasia, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions, large regenerative nodule, hepatocellular adenoma, dysplastic nodule, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The term atypical hepatocellular neoplasm/hepatocellular neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential can be used especially in needle core biopsies when a well-differentiated hepatocellular lesion is either histologically atypical (focal reticulin loss, focal cytologic/architectural atypia) or is clinically atypical (male sex or female >50 y) and cannot be confidently classified as adenoma or hepatocellular carcinoma. These are resected in an attempt for more definite classification. Although radiology can suggest the diagnosis in some of the entities mentioned above, needle core biopsies are often performed to confirm the diagnosis and plan therapy. Diagnosis of these lesions on needle core biopsies can be challenging and may have overlapping histologic and sometimes even immunohistochemical features. Herein, we review the histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions, along with recent advances in this area. We also provide the best approach for the diagnosis of well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions with ancillary testing, especially on needle core biopsies, and discuss the pitfalls. Accurate recognition of well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions is essential as some of them have excellent prognosis and may not require resection, while others have histologic prognostic information that is key for management.

Genitourinary malignancies include a broad spectrum of distinct tumor entities occurring in the kidney, the urinary tract, the prostate, the adrenal glands, the penis, and testicles. Each tumor entity presents with unique biological characteristics, especially in terms of immunobiology. The immune landscape of genitourinary malignancies differs between immunoreactive tumors like urothelial carcinoma or carcinomas of the kidney, for which several immunotherapeutic treatment options have been approved in the past years. In contrast, prostate cancer presents with low immunogenicity and previous trials exploring immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapeutic agents did not proof substantial survival benefits. In this review, we are presenting a streamlined overview on the role of surgical pathologists within the contemporary practice of immune oncology. It includes current indications for pathologic programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assessment and important pathologic considerations on PD-L1 testing harmonization including interassay and algorithm variabilities. In addition, we will discuss emerging biomarkers beyond PD-L1 and their potential to predict immunotherapy responses including tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, gene expression signatures, and histologic factors.

The addition of "avoiding immune destruction" to the hallmarks of cancer demonstrated the importance of cancer immunology and in particular the role of immune surveillance and escape from malignancies. However, the underlying mechanisms contributing to immune impairment and immune responses are diverse. Loss or reduced expression of the HLA class I molecules are major characteristics of human cancers resulting in an impaired recognition of tumor cells by CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes. This is of clinical relevance and associated with worse patients outcome and limited efficacy of T-cell-based immunotherapies. Here, we summarize the role of HLA class I antigens in cancers by focusing on the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for HLA class I defects, which are caused by either structural alterations or deregulation at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and posttranslational levels. In addition, the influence of HLA class I abnormalities to adaptive and acquired immunotherapy resistances will be described. The in-depth knowledge of the different strategies of malignancies leading to HLA class I defects can be applied to design more effective cancer immunotherapies.

Immunotherapy has shown promising results in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers. Antiprogrammed cell death (PD)-1 therapies have been recently approved in this setting and they are currently tested also in the treatment of locally advanced diseases and in the neoadjuvant setting. However, the clinical benefits of these treatments have been quite variable, hence the need to select those patients who may obtain the maximal efficacy through the identification of predictive biomarkers. Currently, PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression by tumor and immune cells is the most widely used predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, patients with PD-L1 - tumors may still respond to treatments, thereby emphasizing the need for the identification of other predictive biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the current data on histologic and molecular parameters that can be used to select patients with head and neck cancers for immunotherapy, with a focus on squamous cell carcinoma and salivary gland carcinomas.

Inactivation of different subunits of the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex has emerged as one of the most frequent genetic pathways driving a variety of neoplasms of diverse histogenesis, originating in different organs. With few exceptions, most SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies pursue a highly aggressive clinical course resulting in widespread disease dissemination either at or soon after diagnosis, ultimately causing patients' death soon after diagnosis, despite the apparently curative treatment intention. To date, no satisfactorily effective systemic chemotherapy has been established for treating these diseases. This disappointing finding underlines the urgent need for an effective systemic therapy that would enable sufficient intermediate to long-term disease control. Recently, SWI/SNF-deficiency has increasingly emerged as pivotal in cancer immunogenicity and hence a promising biomarker predicting response to immune-checkpoint inhibition therapy utilizing several recently established drugs. This review summarizes the most recent literature on this topic with emphasis on the entities that most likely represent suitable candidates for immune therapy.

Until very recently, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been the mainstay of treatment in non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLCs). However, recent advances in molecular immunology have unveiled some of the complexity of the mechanisms regulating cellular immune responses and led to the successful targeting of immune checkpoints in attempts to enhance antitumor T-cell responses. Immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4, programmed cell death protein-1, and programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1 have been shown to play central roles in evading cancer immunity. Thus, these molecules have been targeted by inhibitors for the management of cancers forming the basis of immunotherapy. Advanced NSCLC has been the paradigm for the benefits of immunotherapy in any cancer. Treatment decisions are made based on the expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cells and the presence or absence of driver mutations. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) and no driver mutations are treated with single-agent immunotherapy whereas, for all other patients with a lower level of PD-L1 expression, a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is preferred. Thus, PD-L1 blockers are the only immunotherapeutic agents approved in advanced NSCLC without any oncogenic driver mutations. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, however, may not be the best biomarker in view of its dynamic nature in time and space, and the benefits may be seen regardless of PD -L1 expression. Each immunotherapy molecule is prescribed based on the levels of PD-L1 expression as assessed by a Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic assay. Other biomarkers that have been studied include tumor mutational burden, the T-effector signature, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radiomic assays, inflammation index, presence or absence of immune-related adverse events and specific driver mutations, and gut as well as local microbiome. At the current time, none of these biomarkers are routinely used in the clinical decision-making process for immunotherapy in NSCLC. However, in individual cases, they can be useful adjuncts to conventional therapy. This review describes our current understanding of the role of biomarkers as predictors of response to immune checkpoint molecules. To begin with a brief on cancer immunology in general and in NSCLC, in particular, is discussed. In the end, recent advancements in laboratory techniques for refining biomarker assays are described.

Over the last years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable anti-tumor activity and beneficial effects in patients with early and advanced melanoma. However, ICIs provide clinical benefit only in a minority of patients due to primary and/or acquired resistance mechanisms. Immunotherapy resistance is a complex phenomenon relying on genetic and epigenetic factors, which ultimately influence the interplay between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Information is accumulating on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the production of resistance and the resulting diminished therapeutic efficacy. In addition, current knowledge on predictors of response and toxicity to immunotherapy and on biomarkers that reliably identify resistant patients is in progress. In this review, we will focus on the tumor microenvironment changes induced by ICIs in melanoma, summarizing the available evidence of clinical trials in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. We will also overview the role of potential biomarkers in predicting disease response to ICIs, providing insight into current and future research in this field.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed therapy strategies in breast cancer (BC) patients suffering from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). For example, in Europe the anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) ICI Azetolizumab is approved for adult patients with locally advanced or metastasized TNBC (mTNBC), depending on the immunohistochemical (IHC) PD-L1 expression of immune cells in the tumor area [immune cell (IC) score ≥1%); the anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) ICI pembrolizumab is approved for mTNBC if PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS), that is PD-L1 expression on tumor and/or immune cells, is ≥10. For early TNBC, in contrast, neoadjuvant use of pembrolizumab is approved in the United States and Europe independent from PD-L1 IHC expression. The determination of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue to predict response to ICI therapy requires sensitive immunostaining with appropriate primary antibodies and staining protocols and a standardized and meticulous assessment of PD-L1 IHC stained breast cancer tissue slides. For the selection of the test material and continuous quality control of the dyeing, high standards must be applied. The evaluation is carried out according to various evaluation algorithms (scores). Here, the role of PD-L1 in BC and the currently most relevant PD-L1 assays and scores for TNBC will be explained. Furthermore, other tissue-based biomarkers potentially predictive for ICI therapy response in BC, for example, tumor mutational burden (TMB), will be presented in this review.