首页 > 最新文献

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)最新文献

英文 中文
Chronic pain in individuals who have visual impairments: a protocol for an international survey study. 视力障碍患者的慢性疼痛:一项国际调查研究的协议。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1631770
Jordi Miró, Ariadna Sampietro, Ester Solé, Pere Llorens-Vernet, Carlos Mora

Individuals who have visual impairments (IVI) face unique challenges in coping with and adjusting to chronic pain. However, this population remains underrepresented in chronic pain research and often encounters barriers in accessing effective, tailored healthcare. The primary objective of this study is to generate baseline data on the prevalence, types, and impact of chronic pain in this population. The secondary objectives are to identify specific challenges in pain management and provide evidence to identify specific challenges in pain management and to provide evidence that can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at promoting equitable healthcare and improving quality of life. An international cross-sectional observational study will be conducted using an online survey administered via LimeSurvey. The survey, developed specifically for this project, will be accessible in multiple languages to enhance participation and representativeness. It is designed to capture the unique aspects of chronic pain, ocular and non-ocular forms, in IVI, including barriers to care and management challenges. This protocol aims to establish a comprehensive understanding of chronic pain in IVI. The findings will help bridge current research gaps, guide tailored interventions, and inform policy initiatives, ultimately reducing healthcare disparities and enhancing quality of life for this underserved group.

个人谁有视觉障碍(IVI)面临着独特的挑战,在应对和调整慢性疼痛。然而,这一人群在慢性疼痛研究中仍然代表性不足,并且在获得有效的量身定制的医疗保健方面经常遇到障碍。本研究的主要目的是生成有关该人群中慢性疼痛的患病率、类型和影响的基线数据。次要目标是确定疼痛管理方面的具体挑战,并提供证据,以确定疼痛管理方面的具体挑战,并提供证据,为制定旨在促进公平保健和改善生活质量的有针对性干预措施提供信息。一项国际横断面观察性研究将通过limessurvey进行在线调查。专为本项目编制的调查将以多种语文提供,以加强参与和代表性。它旨在捕捉IVI中慢性疼痛的独特方面,包括眼部和非眼部形式,包括护理障碍和管理挑战。本协议的目的是建立一个全面的了解慢性疼痛静脉注射。研究结果将有助于弥合目前的研究差距,指导量身定制的干预措施,并为政策举措提供信息,最终减少医疗保健差距,提高这一服务不足群体的生活质量。
{"title":"Chronic pain in individuals who have visual impairments: a protocol for an international survey study.","authors":"Jordi Miró, Ariadna Sampietro, Ester Solé, Pere Llorens-Vernet, Carlos Mora","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1631770","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1631770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals who have visual impairments (IVI) face unique challenges in coping with and adjusting to chronic pain. However, this population remains underrepresented in chronic pain research and often encounters barriers in accessing effective, tailored healthcare. The primary objective of this study is to generate baseline data on the prevalence, types, and impact of chronic pain in this population. The secondary objectives are to identify specific challenges in pain management and provide evidence to identify specific challenges in pain management and to provide evidence that can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at promoting equitable healthcare and improving quality of life. An international cross-sectional observational study will be conducted using an online survey administered via LimeSurvey. The survey, developed specifically for this project, will be accessible in multiple languages to enhance participation and representativeness. It is designed to capture the unique aspects of chronic pain, ocular and non-ocular forms, in IVI, including barriers to care and management challenges. This protocol aims to establish a comprehensive understanding of chronic pain in IVI. The findings will help bridge current research gaps, guide tailored interventions, and inform policy initiatives, ultimately reducing healthcare disparities and enhancing quality of life for this underserved group.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1631770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144981076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Insight in pharmacological treatment of pain - 2023. 社论:洞察疼痛的药理治疗- 2023。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1662611
Robert Gyula Almasi
{"title":"Editorial: Insight in pharmacological treatment of pain - 2023.","authors":"Robert Gyula Almasi","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1662611","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1662611","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1662611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364663/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144981101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical, neurophysiological and neurochemical effects of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome-a systematic review and meta-analysis. 无创脑电刺激治疗纤维肌痛综合征的临床、神经生理和神经化学效应——系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1593746
Christine Winterholler, Maria Helena Coura, Pedro Montoya

Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is linked to central sensitization and neuroplastic alterations that contribute to chronic pain, fatigue, cognitive, sleep, and affective disturbances. Conventional treatments offer limited benefit. Non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), may modulate brain function and relieve symptoms, but findings remain inconsistent.

Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of tES on clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and neurochemical outcomes in FMS.

Methods: Seven databases were searched for studies published between April 2013 and April 2023. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, cross-over, one-arm, and case studies involving adult FMS patients. Data extraction followed Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and used RevMan 6.6.0.

Results: Anodal tDCS produced short- to mid-term reductions in pain and mood symptoms, especially when applied over M1 or DLPFC. Longer interventions and repeated sessions enhanced effects, though protocol heterogeneity limited comparability. Both subjective (VAS, NRS) and objective (QST) measures confirmed pain reduction. Cognitive improvements were inconsistent, and quality of life effects were limited. Neurophysiological and neurochemical changes suggested possible mechanisms, though findings varied. Study quality was mixed, with small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant but small effects on pain (Hedges' g < 0.2), with limited evidence on clinical relevance.

Conclusions: Anodal tDCS may offer short-term relief of pain and mood symptoms in FMS, potentially through modulation of cortical excitability and neuroplasticity. However, due to variability in findings and methodological limitations, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Future trials should use standardized protocols, assess long-term effects, and include clinically meaningful outcome measures.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023412332, PROSPERO CRD42023412332.

背景:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)与中枢致敏和神经可塑性改变有关,可导致慢性疼痛、疲劳、认知、睡眠和情感障碍。常规治疗的效果有限。非侵入性经颅电刺激(tES),特别是经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),可能调节脑功能和缓解症状,但研究结果仍不一致。目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析tES对FMS临床、神经生理、神经心理和神经化学结果的影响。方法:检索2013年4月至2023年4月间发表的7个数据库。符合条件的设计包括随机对照试验、交叉试验、单臂试验和涉及成年FMS患者的病例研究。数据提取遵循Cochrane协作指南,使用RevMan 6.6.0软件。结果:负极tDCS在疼痛和情绪症状方面产生了短期到中期的减轻,特别是在M1或DLPFC上应用时。虽然方案的异质性限制了可比性,但较长的干预和重复的治疗可以增强效果。主观(VAS, NRS)和客观(QST)测量均证实疼痛减轻。认知改善不一致,生活质量影响有限。神经生理学和神经化学的变化暗示了可能的机制,尽管研究结果各不相同。研究质量参差不齐,样本量小,方法不一致。荟萃分析显示对疼痛有统计学意义但影响很小(Hedges’g结论:阳极tDCS可能通过调节皮质兴奋性和神经可塑性,在FMS中短期缓解疼痛和情绪症状。然而,由于研究结果的可变性和方法学的局限性,其临床相关性尚不清楚。未来的试验应采用标准化的方案,评估长期效果,并包括临床有意义的结果测量。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023412332, PROSPERO CRD42023412332。
{"title":"Clinical, neurophysiological and neurochemical effects of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Christine Winterholler, Maria Helena Coura, Pedro Montoya","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1593746","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1593746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is linked to central sensitization and neuroplastic alterations that contribute to chronic pain, fatigue, cognitive, sleep, and affective disturbances. Conventional treatments offer limited benefit. Non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), may modulate brain function and relieve symptoms, but findings remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of tES on clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and neurochemical outcomes in FMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched for studies published between April 2013 and April 2023. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, cross-over, one-arm, and case studies involving adult FMS patients. Data extraction followed Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and used RevMan 6.6.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anodal tDCS produced short- to mid-term reductions in pain and mood symptoms, especially when applied over M1 or DLPFC. Longer interventions and repeated sessions enhanced effects, though protocol heterogeneity limited comparability. Both subjective (VAS, NRS) and objective (QST) measures confirmed pain reduction. Cognitive improvements were inconsistent, and quality of life effects were limited. Neurophysiological and neurochemical changes suggested possible mechanisms, though findings varied. Study quality was mixed, with small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant but small effects on pain (Hedges' <i>g</i> < 0.2), with limited evidence on clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodal tDCS may offer short-term relief of pain and mood symptoms in FMS, potentially through modulation of cortical excitability and neuroplasticity. However, due to variability in findings and methodological limitations, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Future trials should use standardized protocols, assess long-term effects, and include clinically meaningful outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023412332, PROSPERO CRD42023412332.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1593746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144877104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comprehensive review of the supraspinal mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation on chronic pain and cognition. 脊髓刺激对慢性疼痛和认知的椎上机制综述。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1589723
Kelly E Gartner, Sofia Rustioni, Aamya Vohra, Mustafa Almosawi, Norah Hill, Travis Stewart, Nelleke C van Wouwe, Ajmal Zemmar

Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. It can result in a significant reduction in quality of life and has been associated with decreased neurocognitive performance in attention, memory, and processing speed. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a surgical treatment option for drug-refractory chronic pain. Although SCS can improve pain perception and related physical well-being, the mechanisms by which SCS improves pain perception and affects cognition remain largely unknown. Here, we review the cognitive impairments and neuroanatomical changes that can arise from chronic pain and how SCS treatment impacts these. This review identifies four key regions that may modulate attention, executive and emotional functioning, and memory with SCS: the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, and somatosensory cortex. These observations suggest a role for SCS to influence and modulate the cognitive-emotional aspects of pain perception. Our review provides new insights to identify potential cortical areas that can serve as biomarkers or neuromodulation targets for SCS treatment. Recognizing the changes in activity within these supraspinal regions during SCS treatment may help individualize pain treatment and induce favorable cognitive shifts.

慢性疼痛是全世界致残的主要原因之一。它会导致生活质量的显著下降,并与注意力、记忆力和处理速度的神经认知能力下降有关。脊髓刺激(SCS)是治疗药物难治性慢性疼痛的一种外科治疗选择。虽然SCS可以改善痛觉和相关的身体健康,但其改善痛觉和影响认知的机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们回顾了慢性疼痛可能引起的认知障碍和神经解剖学改变,以及SCS治疗如何影响这些。这篇综述确定了四个可能调节注意力、执行和情绪功能以及记忆的关键区域:杏仁核、前扣带皮层、丘脑和体感皮层。这些观察结果表明,SCS影响和调节疼痛感知的认知-情绪方面的作用。我们的综述为识别潜在的皮质区域提供了新的见解,这些区域可以作为生物标志物或神经调节靶点用于SCS治疗。在SCS治疗过程中,认识到这些棘上区域活动的变化可能有助于个体化疼痛治疗,并诱导有利的认知转变。
{"title":"A comprehensive review of the supraspinal mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation on chronic pain and cognition.","authors":"Kelly E Gartner, Sofia Rustioni, Aamya Vohra, Mustafa Almosawi, Norah Hill, Travis Stewart, Nelleke C van Wouwe, Ajmal Zemmar","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1589723","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1589723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. It can result in a significant reduction in quality of life and has been associated with decreased neurocognitive performance in attention, memory, and processing speed. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a surgical treatment option for drug-refractory chronic pain. Although SCS can improve pain perception and related physical well-being, the mechanisms by which SCS improves pain perception and affects cognition remain largely unknown. Here, we review the cognitive impairments and neuroanatomical changes that can arise from chronic pain and how SCS treatment impacts these. This review identifies four key regions that may modulate attention, executive and emotional functioning, and memory with SCS: the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, and somatosensory cortex. These observations suggest a role for SCS to influence and modulate the cognitive-emotional aspects of pain perception. Our review provides new insights to identify potential cortical areas that can serve as biomarkers or neuromodulation targets for SCS treatment. Recognizing the changes in activity within these supraspinal regions during SCS treatment may help individualize pain treatment and induce favorable cognitive shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1589723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336175/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144823344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anti-nociceptive properties of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors in patients with chronic back pain. 慢性背痛患者心肺压力感受器的抗伤害性。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1593939
Yuto Iwakuma, Jennifer Liu, Davina A Clonch, Megan E Gangwish, Christopher M Lam, Seth W Holwerda

Introduction: Reduced pain perception following a persistent noxious stimulus during a study session (short-term habituation) is believed to be partially mediated by descending inhibitory mechanisms, although these mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. We examined the hypothesis that cardiopulmonary baroreceptor would significantly increase short-term habituation in chronic back pain (CBP) patients.

Methods: A short-term habituation protocol was utilized that involved 1-sec pulses (×10) at 105% heat pain threshold on the anterior forearm at 0.5 Hz. Cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading was performed via lower body negative pressure (LBNP) that reduces central venous pressure to elicit a reflex increase in sympathetic nerve activity.

Results: Short-term habituation was observed in young, healthy participants (n = 11), as indicated by a reduction in subjective pain ratings across the 10 repetitive heat pulses (-42% ± 29, P < 0.01, n = 11). Short-term habituation was also observed in CBP patients (-32% ± 30, P < 0.01, n = 12). Cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading via LBNP significantly reduced pain ratings across the 10 repetitive heat pulses in CBP patients compared with supine control (patient positioned in LBNP chamber but without a reduction in pressure) and upright sitting (chair), as indicated by a more negative area under the curve index (LBNP: -16.3 ± 4.1; Control: -14.4 ± 2.6; Upright sitting: -15.1 ± 4.1, P = 0.02). However, LBNP-mediated reductions in pain ratings were selective to CBP patients with more severe symptoms, i.e., neuropathic pain (LBNP: -14.7 ± 2.1; Control: -12.8 ± 1.4; Upright sitting: -12.1 ± 1.2, P = 0.04), whereas no effect of LBNP was observed in young, healthy participants (P = 0.83). In support, CBP patients with neuropathic pain exhibited significantly elevated mechanical pressure pain threshold during LBNP (P = 0.04).

Conclusions: Together, these findings demonstrate an association between cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading and a reduction in pain perception during repetitive noxious stimuli in CBP patients, particularly among CBP patients with greater pain severity.

导读:在学习过程中持续的有害刺激(短期习惯化)后疼痛感知的减少被认为部分是由下行抑制机制介导的,尽管这些机制尚未完全阐明。我们检验了心肺压力感受器会显著增加慢性背痛(CBP)患者的短期适应的假设。方法:采用短期习惯化方案,包括1秒脉冲(×10), 105%热痛阈值,在前臂前0.5 Hz。心肺压力感受器卸荷通过下体负压(LBNP)进行,降低中心静脉压,引起交感神经活动的反射性增加。结果:在年轻、健康的参与者(n = 11)中观察到短期习惯化,这表明在10次重复热脉冲中主观疼痛评分降低(-42%±29,P = 11)。CBP患者也观察到短期习惯化(-32%±30,P n = 12)。通过LBNP卸载心肺压力受体,与仰卧位对照(患者位于LBNP室中,但压力没有降低)和直立坐姿(椅子)相比,CBP患者在10次重复热脉冲中疼痛评分显著降低,曲线指数下的负面积更大(LBNP: -16.3±4.1;对照:-14.4±2.6;直立坐姿:-15.1±4.1,P = 0.02)。然而,LBNP介导的疼痛评分的降低对症状更严重的CBP患者是选择性的,即神经性疼痛(LBNP: -14.7±2.1;对照组:-12.8±1.4;直立坐姿:-12.1±1.2,P = 0.04),而在年轻、健康的参与者中没有观察到LBNP的影响(P = 0.83)。为了支持这一观点,伴有神经性疼痛的CBP患者在LBNP期间表现出明显升高的机械压力痛阈(P = 0.04)。结论:综上所述,这些发现证明了CBP患者,特别是疼痛严重程度较高的CBP患者,在重复有害刺激时,心肺压力感受器卸载与痛觉减少之间存在关联。
{"title":"Anti-nociceptive properties of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors in patients with chronic back pain.","authors":"Yuto Iwakuma, Jennifer Liu, Davina A Clonch, Megan E Gangwish, Christopher M Lam, Seth W Holwerda","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1593939","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1593939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reduced pain perception following a persistent noxious stimulus during a study session (short-term habituation) is believed to be partially mediated by descending inhibitory mechanisms, although these mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. We examined the hypothesis that cardiopulmonary baroreceptor would significantly increase short-term habituation in chronic back pain (CBP) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A short-term habituation protocol was utilized that involved 1-sec pulses (×10) at 105% heat pain threshold on the anterior forearm at 0.5 Hz. Cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading was performed via lower body negative pressure (LBNP) that reduces central venous pressure to elicit a reflex increase in sympathetic nerve activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short-term habituation was observed in young, healthy participants (<i>n</i> = 11), as indicated by a reduction in subjective pain ratings across the 10 repetitive heat pulses (-42% ± 29, <i>P</i> < 0.01, <i>n</i> = 11). Short-term habituation was also observed in CBP patients (-32% ± 30, <i>P</i> < 0.01, <i>n</i> = 12). Cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading via LBNP significantly reduced pain ratings across the 10 repetitive heat pulses in CBP patients compared with supine control (patient positioned in LBNP chamber but without a reduction in pressure) and upright sitting (chair), as indicated by a more negative area under the curve index (LBNP: -16.3 ± 4.1; Control: -14.4 ± 2.6; Upright sitting: -15.1 ± 4.1, <i>P</i> = 0.02). However, LBNP-mediated reductions in pain ratings were selective to CBP patients with more severe symptoms, i.e., neuropathic pain (LBNP: -14.7 ± 2.1; Control: -12.8 ± 1.4; Upright sitting: -12.1 ± 1.2, <i>P</i> = 0.04), whereas no effect of LBNP was observed in young, healthy participants (<i>P</i> = 0.83). In support, CBP patients with neuropathic pain exhibited significantly elevated mechanical pressure pain threshold during LBNP (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, these findings demonstrate an association between cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading and a reduction in pain perception during repetitive noxious stimuli in CBP patients, particularly among CBP patients with greater pain severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1593939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whole-body cryostimulation exposures effectively alleviates menstrual-related pain and associated sleep disturbances in young women: a randomized controlled trial. 一项随机对照试验:全身冷冻刺激暴露有效缓解年轻女性月经相关疼痛和相关睡眠障碍。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1614153
Quentin Bretonneau, Coralie Arc-Chagnaud, Benoit Dugué, Olivier Dupuy, Nathalie Delpech, Carina Enea, Laurent Bosquet

Introduction: Menstrual-related pain and sleep disturbances are widespread in women experiencing premenstrual syndrome and primary dysmenorrhea. Such disturbances could be alleviated through repeated whole-body cryostimulation (WBC) sessions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of menstrual-related pain on sleep parameters, and the impact of WBC exposures on pain and sleep.

Materials and methods: Pain and sleep were evaluated for two 5-day periods under different conditions (control vs. WBC), randomly assigned across two consecutive menstrual cycles. Measurements began when the first pain/symptom indicating the onset of the menstrual phase was experienced. Pain was rated using a scale, while sleep was assessed using accelerometers and questionnaires. Throughout the 5-day WBC exposure, women underwent 3-min exposure to intense ventilated cold air each evening. After data collection, participants were categorized into high (HP) or low/no pain (LP) groups based on control pain scores.

Results: Twenty-nine naturally menstruating women were assessed. Perceived sleep quality was lower in the HP group compared to the LP group during the control condition (Spiegel score: 20.1 ± 2.3 vs. 22.3 ± 1.9, respectively; Cohen's d = 1.1). Across both groups, perceived sleep quality improved with the number of WBC exposures (night1: 19.5 ± 3.2 vs. night5: 23.5 ± 3.8; Hedge's g = 1.10). In the HP group, pain was reduced in the WBC condition compared to the control condition. Changes in pain and perceived sleep quality following WBC were correlated (r = -0.86).

Discussion: Women experiencing higher menstrual-related pain reported poorer perceived sleep quality. Their pain was reduced by WBC exposures. This improvement was highly associated with the enhancement in sleep quality.

引言:月经相关的疼痛和睡眠障碍在经历经前综合征和原发性痛经的妇女中很普遍。这种干扰可以通过反复的全身冷冻刺激(WBC)来缓解。因此,本研究旨在评估月经相关疼痛对睡眠参数的影响,以及白细胞暴露对疼痛和睡眠的影响。材料和方法:在两个连续的月经周期中随机分配,在不同的条件下(对照与白细胞计数)评估两个5天的疼痛和睡眠。测量开始时,第一次疼痛/症状表明月经期的开始经历。疼痛用量表评定,睡眠用加速度计和问卷调查评定。在5天的白细胞暴露过程中,女性每天晚上暴露于强烈通风的冷空气中3分钟。数据收集后,根据对照疼痛评分将参与者分为高(HP)或低/无疼痛(LP)组。结果:对29名自然月经妇女进行了评估。在对照条件下,HP组的感知睡眠质量低于LP组(Spiegel评分:分别为20.1±2.3比22.3±1.9;Cohen’s d = 1.1)。在两组中,感知睡眠质量随着白细胞暴露次数的增加而改善(第1夜:19.5±3.2 vs.第5夜:23.5±3.8;对冲系数g = 1.10)。在HP组中,与对照组相比,WBC组疼痛减轻。WBC后疼痛变化与感知睡眠质量相关(r = -0.86)。讨论:经期疼痛加重的女性睡眠质量较差。WBC暴露减轻了他们的疼痛。这种改善与睡眠质量的提高高度相关。
{"title":"Whole-body cryostimulation exposures effectively alleviates menstrual-related pain and associated sleep disturbances in young women: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Quentin Bretonneau, Coralie Arc-Chagnaud, Benoit Dugué, Olivier Dupuy, Nathalie Delpech, Carina Enea, Laurent Bosquet","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1614153","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1614153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menstrual-related pain and sleep disturbances are widespread in women experiencing premenstrual syndrome and primary dysmenorrhea. Such disturbances could be alleviated through repeated whole-body cryostimulation (WBC) sessions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of menstrual-related pain on sleep parameters, and the impact of WBC exposures on pain and sleep.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pain and sleep were evaluated for two 5-day periods under different conditions (control vs. WBC), randomly assigned across two consecutive menstrual cycles. Measurements began when the first pain/symptom indicating the onset of the menstrual phase was experienced. Pain was rated using a scale, while sleep was assessed using accelerometers and questionnaires. Throughout the 5-day WBC exposure, women underwent 3-min exposure to intense ventilated cold air each evening. After data collection, participants were categorized into high (HP) or low/no pain (LP) groups based on control pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine naturally menstruating women were assessed. Perceived sleep quality was lower in the HP group compared to the LP group during the control condition (Spiegel score: 20.1 ± 2.3 vs. 22.3 ± 1.9, respectively; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.1). Across both groups, perceived sleep quality improved with the number of WBC exposures (night1: 19.5 ± 3.2 vs. night5: 23.5 ± 3.8; Hedge's <i>g</i> = 1.10). In the HP group, pain was reduced in the WBC condition compared to the control condition. Changes in pain and perceived sleep quality following WBC were correlated (<i>r</i> = -0.86).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Women experiencing higher menstrual-related pain reported poorer perceived sleep quality. Their pain was reduced by WBC exposures. This improvement was highly associated with the enhancement in sleep quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1614153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144801123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Altered neural oscillation patterns and functional connectivity in postherpetic neuralgia: evidence from resting-state EEG. 带状疱疹后神经痛的神经振荡模式改变和功能连接:静息状态脑电图证据。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1603345
Fei Gao, Mengru Wang, Huibin Jia, Georgi V Georgiev, Yi Feng, Wenxia Li

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that significantly affects the quality of life, often leading to physical discomfort, emotional distress, and psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety. This study aimed to systematically assess the neural oscillatory activity and functional connectivity patterns in patients with PHN using resting-state electroencephalography (EEG). Overall, 21 patients with PHN and 17 healthy controls participated in this study. Resting-state EEG data were collected and analyzed. Power spectrum density analysis was conducted to compare frequency band activity, and correlation analyses were used to examine associations between EEG power and psychological symptoms. Functional connectivity was assessed using the weighted phase lag index. Power spectrum density analysis revealed significantly higher EEG power across the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands in patients with PHN compared with controls. Correlation analyses indicated that delta and theta frequency band power were positively associated with the Beck Depression Inventory scores, whereas delta frequency band power was negatively correlated with the State Anxiety Inventory scores. Additionally, functional connectivity analysis demonstrated reduced gamma-band connectivity in patients with PHN, particularly in regions of the sensorimotor and pain modulation networks. These findings suggest that PHN is characterized by widespread hyperactivity in neural circuits, accompanied by disrupted interregional communication. These results provide valuable insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying PHN and highlight potential biomarkers for developing targeted neuromodulatory treatments to alleviate pain and improve the psychological well-being of affected individuals.

带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是一种使人衰弱的慢性疼痛状况,严重影响生活质量,经常导致身体不适、情绪困扰和心理合并症,如抑郁和焦虑。本研究旨在利用静息状态脑电图(EEG)系统地评估PHN患者的神经振荡活动和功能连接模式。总共有21名PHN患者和17名健康对照者参加了这项研究。采集静息状态脑电图数据并进行分析。用功率谱密度分析比较频带活动,用相关分析检查脑电图功率与心理症状之间的关系。使用加权相位滞后指数评估功能连通性。功率谱密度分析显示,与对照组相比,PHN患者的δ、θ、α、β和γ频段的脑电图功率明显更高。相关分析表明,δ和θ频段功率与贝克抑郁量表得分呈正相关,δ频段功率与状态焦虑量表得分呈负相关。此外,功能连通性分析表明,PHN患者的伽马波段连通性降低,特别是在感觉运动和疼痛调节网络区域。这些发现表明,PHN的特征是神经回路普遍亢进,并伴有区域间交流中断。这些结果为PHN的神经生理机制提供了有价值的见解,并强调了开发靶向神经调节治疗以减轻疼痛和改善受影响个体心理健康的潜在生物标志物。
{"title":"Altered neural oscillation patterns and functional connectivity in postherpetic neuralgia: evidence from resting-state EEG.","authors":"Fei Gao, Mengru Wang, Huibin Jia, Georgi V Georgiev, Yi Feng, Wenxia Li","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1603345","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1603345","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that significantly affects the quality of life, often leading to physical discomfort, emotional distress, and psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety. This study aimed to systematically assess the neural oscillatory activity and functional connectivity patterns in patients with PHN using resting-state electroencephalography (EEG). Overall, 21 patients with PHN and 17 healthy controls participated in this study. Resting-state EEG data were collected and analyzed. Power spectrum density analysis was conducted to compare frequency band activity, and correlation analyses were used to examine associations between EEG power and psychological symptoms. Functional connectivity was assessed using the weighted phase lag index. Power spectrum density analysis revealed significantly higher EEG power across the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands in patients with PHN compared with controls. Correlation analyses indicated that delta and theta frequency band power were positively associated with the Beck Depression Inventory scores, whereas delta frequency band power was negatively correlated with the State Anxiety Inventory scores. Additionally, functional connectivity analysis demonstrated reduced gamma-band connectivity in patients with PHN, particularly in regions of the sensorimotor and pain modulation networks. These findings suggest that PHN is characterized by widespread hyperactivity in neural circuits, accompanied by disrupted interregional communication. These results provide valuable insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying PHN and highlight potential biomarkers for developing targeted neuromodulatory treatments to alleviate pain and improve the psychological well-being of affected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1603345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144801122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and radiological comparison of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty combined with ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a retrospective, matched-cohort study. 经皮颈椎核成形术联合超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频治疗颈神经根性疼痛的临床和影像学比较:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1618608
Baodong Wang, He Song, Tianyi Wang, Peng Du, Lei Zang, Lihui Yang

Background: The best treatment yielding clinical benefits was still equivocal and controversial for the treatment of cervical radicular pain (CRP). This study aimed to propose a novel combination strategy of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) and ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of cervical nerve root for CRP, and to compare its therapeutic effects with PRF alone.

Methods: 120 CRP patients who satisfied the inclusion requirements between January 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and split into PCN + PRF and PRF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) technique was used to correct the imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. Then, clinical outcomes including the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, clinical assessment scale for cervical spondylosis (CASCS), modified MacNab criteria, radiological parameters, and complications were evaluated.

Results: In all, 120 patients were used to calculate the propensity score, producing 26 matched pairs that were monitored for a minimum of a year. When compared to the preoperative data, both groups' neck pain VAS scores, arm pain VAS scores, NDI scores, and CASCS scores saw a significant improvement during the follow-up period (p < 0.001). However, patients in the PRF group noted higher neck pain VAS scores, arm pain VAS scores, NDI scores, and CASCS scores than those in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The decrease in surgical level disc height was more pronounced in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The ROM was reduced in the PRF group but increased in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the PRF and PCN + PRF groups had excellent and good rates of 76.92% and 84.62%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: We present and describe a novel strategy for the combined treatment of CRP in chronic cervical radicular pain using ultrasound-guided percutaneous disc radiofrequency ablation PCN and spinal nerve root pulse radiofrequency PRF, which is both effective and safe throughout the treatment process, reducing pain and improving function.

背景:对于颈椎神经根性疼痛(CRP)的治疗,产生临床疗效的最佳治疗方法仍然是模棱两可和有争议的。本研究旨在提出经皮颈核成形术(PCN)与超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频(PRF)联合治疗CRP的新策略,并比较其与单独PRF的治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年3月期间符合纳入要求的120例CRP患者,分为PCN + PRF组和PRF组。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)技术校正组间混杂变量的不平衡。然后评估临床结局包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分、颈椎病临床评定量表(CASCS)、改良MacNab标准、影像学参数、并发症。结果:总共有120名患者被用来计算倾向得分,产生26对匹配的配对,监测至少一年。与术前比较,随访期间两组患者颈痛VAS评分、臂痛VAS评分、NDI评分、CASCS评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:我们提出并描述了一种超声引导下经皮椎间盘射频消融PCN和脊神经根脉冲射频PRF联合治疗慢性颈根性疼痛CRP的新策略,该策略在整个治疗过程中既有效又安全,减轻了疼痛,改善了功能。
{"title":"Clinical and radiological comparison of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty combined with ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a retrospective, matched-cohort study.","authors":"Baodong Wang, He Song, Tianyi Wang, Peng Du, Lei Zang, Lihui Yang","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1618608","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1618608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The best treatment yielding clinical benefits was still equivocal and controversial for the treatment of cervical radicular pain (CRP). This study aimed to propose a novel combination strategy of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) and ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of cervical nerve root for CRP, and to compare its therapeutic effects with PRF alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>120 CRP patients who satisfied the inclusion requirements between January 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and split into PCN + PRF and PRF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) technique was used to correct the imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. Then, clinical outcomes including the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, clinical assessment scale for cervical spondylosis (CASCS), modified MacNab criteria, radiological parameters, and complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 120 patients were used to calculate the propensity score, producing 26 matched pairs that were monitored for a minimum of a year. When compared to the preoperative data, both groups' neck pain VAS scores, arm pain VAS scores, NDI scores, and CASCS scores saw a significant improvement during the follow-up period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, patients in the PRF group noted higher neck pain VAS scores, arm pain VAS scores, NDI scores, and CASCS scores than those in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The decrease in surgical level disc height was more pronounced in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The ROM was reduced in the PRF group but increased in the PRF + PCN group at the final follow-up (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the PRF and PCN + PRF groups had excellent and good rates of 76.92% and 84.62%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present and describe a novel strategy for the combined treatment of CRP in chronic cervical radicular pain using ultrasound-guided percutaneous disc radiofrequency ablation PCN and spinal nerve root pulse radiofrequency PRF, which is both effective and safe throughout the treatment process, reducing pain and improving function.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1618608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325311/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation combined with physiotherapy in the management of chronic pain in adults: a systematic review. 脊髓刺激联合物理疗法治疗成人慢性疼痛的有效性:一项系统综述。
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1620289
Adilia Maria Soares Porciuncula Barros, Gabrielly Santos Pereira, Josie Resende Torres da Silva, Marcelo Lourenço da Silva, Maria do Desterro da Costa E Silva, Luciano Maia Alves Ferrera

Background: Chronic pain affects a significant portion of the population, and conventional treatments often prove insufficient. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), a neuromodulation technique, has shown benefits in pain relief, while physiotherapy is widely employed to enhance physical function and quality of life. Although the combination of these approaches may offer synergistic effects, existing evidence is limited and fragmented.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), with or without the association of physiotherapy, in the management of chronic pain in adults. Methodology: The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO strategy. A comprehensive search was performed across databases including Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, BASE, and VHL (BVS: MEDLINE, IBECS, WPRIM, LILACS, PERIÓDICO CAPES) using MeSH terms and Boolean operators: ("Spinal Cord Stimulation" OR "Neuromodulation") AND ("Chronic Pain" OR "Pain Management") AND ("Physical Therapy Modalities" OR "Physiotherapy" OR "Rehabilitation"). Only studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese in the past 10 years were included, focusing on chronic pain and reporting outcomes related to pain reduction and functional improvement.

Results: Eight studies comprising 777 patients were included. Spinal cord stimulation alone led to significant pain reductions, with responder rates above 80% and average decreases of 5-6 cm on pain scales. Improvements in quality of life and functional disability were also reported, with reductions of over 30 points in disability indices and up to 40% in opioid use. However, only one study included physiotherapy as a complementary intervention, without isolating its effects. No study directly evaluated the combined efficacy of SCS and physiotherapy, highlighting a gap in the literature.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the proven effectiveness of SCS in chronic pain management but reveal a lack of studies assessing its integration with physiotherapy. Future clinical trials should address this gap to explore potential synergistic effects and optimize interdisciplinary pain treatment strategies.

背景:慢性疼痛影响了很大一部分人群,而传统的治疗方法往往被证明是不够的。脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种神经调节技术,已显示出缓解疼痛的益处,而物理治疗被广泛应用于提高身体功能和生活质量。虽然这些方法的组合可能会产生协同效应,但现有证据有限且支离破碎。目的:本系统综述旨在评估脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗成人慢性疼痛的临床结果,无论是否与物理治疗相关。方法:根据PRISMA指南和PICO策略进行审查。使用MeSH术语和布尔运算符(“脊髓刺激”或“神经调节”)和(“慢性疼痛”或“疼痛管理”)以及(“物理治疗方式”或“物理治疗”或“康复”),在包括Cochrane图书馆、ScienceDirect、BASE和VHL (BVS: MEDLINE, IBECS, WPRIM, LILACS, PERIÓDICO CAPES)在内的数据库中进行了全面搜索。仅纳入过去10年以英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语发表的研究,重点关注慢性疼痛并报告与疼痛减轻和功能改善相关的结果。结果:纳入了8项研究,包括777例患者。脊髓单独刺激可显著减轻疼痛,反应率超过80%,疼痛量表平均减少5-6厘米。还报告了生活质量和功能性残疾的改善,残疾指数下降了30多点,阿片类药物的使用下降了40%。然而,只有一项研究将物理治疗作为一种辅助干预,而没有将其效果隔离开来。没有研究直接评估SCS和物理治疗的联合疗效,这突出了文献中的空白。结论:研究结果强调了SCS在慢性疼痛治疗中的有效性,但缺乏评估其与物理治疗结合的研究。未来的临床试验应解决这一差距,以探索潜在的协同效应和优化跨学科疼痛治疗策略。
{"title":"The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation combined with physiotherapy in the management of chronic pain in adults: a systematic review.","authors":"Adilia Maria Soares Porciuncula Barros, Gabrielly Santos Pereira, Josie Resende Torres da Silva, Marcelo Lourenço da Silva, Maria do Desterro da Costa E Silva, Luciano Maia Alves Ferrera","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1620289","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1620289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain affects a significant portion of the population, and conventional treatments often prove insufficient. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), a neuromodulation technique, has shown benefits in pain relief, while physiotherapy is widely employed to enhance physical function and quality of life. Although the combination of these approaches may offer synergistic effects, existing evidence is limited and fragmented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), with or without the association of physiotherapy, in the management of chronic pain in adults. Methodology: The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO strategy. A comprehensive search was performed across databases including Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, BASE, and VHL (BVS: MEDLINE, IBECS, WPRIM, LILACS, PERIÓDICO CAPES) using MeSH terms and Boolean operators: (\"Spinal Cord Stimulation\" OR \"Neuromodulation\") AND (\"Chronic Pain\" OR \"Pain Management\") AND (\"Physical Therapy Modalities\" OR \"Physiotherapy\" OR \"Rehabilitation\"). Only studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese in the past 10 years were included, focusing on chronic pain and reporting outcomes related to pain reduction and functional improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies comprising 777 patients were included. Spinal cord stimulation alone led to significant pain reductions, with responder rates above 80% and average decreases of 5-6 cm on pain scales. Improvements in quality of life and functional disability were also reported, with reductions of over 30 points in disability indices and up to 40% in opioid use. However, only one study included physiotherapy as a complementary intervention, without isolating its effects. No study directly evaluated the combined efficacy of SCS and physiotherapy, highlighting a gap in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the proven effectiveness of SCS in chronic pain management but reveal a lack of studies assessing its integration with physiotherapy. Future clinical trials should address this gap to explore potential synergistic effects and optimize interdisciplinary pain treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1620289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144790874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a randomized-controlled trial. 使用多模态机械刺激与TENS预防阿片类药物处方治疗腰痛:一项随机对照试验
IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1612572
Amy L Baxter, Jena L Etnoyer-Slaski, Jessica Allia Rice Williams, Kevin Swartout, Lindsey L Cohen, M Louise Lawson

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common reason for outpatient opioid prescribing: a quarter of patients receive prescriptions, leading to opioid use disorder (OUD) in 5%. Guideline-recommended multimodal interventions often face implementation barriers, and effective modalities (e.g., electrical stimulation) lack coverage. A multimodal mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) device for LBP has demonstrated safety and efficacy in pain reduction, but its impact on opioid use has not yet been determined.

Methods: As part of an NIH-funded double-blind study to reduce pain and opioid use, patients with moderate-to-severe LBP presenting to two suburban chiropractic centers were randomized to receive either the M-Stim device or a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit for 30 min daily, in addition to other therapies. Analgesic use was reported daily for 28 days, with new prescribing followed weekly for 3 months. The primary outcome was prescribing in the opioid-naïve subjects. Secondary endpoints included risk factors for prolonged use in the opioid-naïve subjects, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) for opioid users between the first and last 2 weeks, and prescribing compared with national rates.

Results: After informed consent, 159 eligible patients were randomized to M-Stim (87) or TENS (72) (mean age 42.6 years, 54% female, BMI 30.9, NRS 5.5) between 23 June 2022 and 31 December 2023. Zero opioid-naïve M-Stim participants (n = 43) received prescriptions (0% vs. 8.6%, Fisher's exact p = 0.086), and those taking opioids used significantly fewer MME [7.5 (SD 3.54) vs. 498.5 MME (SD 474.9), p < 0.0001] for fewer of reported days [M-Stim 2/47 (4.2%)] compared with TENS [n = 36, 38/102 (37%), RR 0.11 (95% CI 0.28-0.44), p = 0.0018]. M-Stim significantly reduced MME in opioid users [-44.6% (32.33 MME), p = 0.02], use days for those with BMI ≥30 [-3 (99% CI -5.73 to -0.26), p = 0.032], and prescribing compared with national rates [9.8% vs. 25%, -63%, RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.66), p = 0.002] while TENS did not.

Conclusions: Among chiropractic patients with moderate-to-severe LBP, added use of a multimodal M-Stim device in the opioid-naïve subjects significantly reduced factors associated with OUD compared with TENS and reduced use days for those with BMI ≥30. This novel device is a potential alternative to prescribing opioids as first line for LBP management.

Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04491175, identifier NCT04491175.

背景:腰痛(LBP)是门诊阿片类药物处方最常见的原因:四分之一的患者接受处方,导致5%的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)。指南推荐的多模式干预措施往往面临实施障碍,有效的模式(如电刺激)缺乏覆盖。一种用于LBP的多模态机械刺激(M-Stim)装置已经证明了减轻疼痛的安全性和有效性,但其对阿片类药物使用的影响尚未确定。方法:作为美国国立卫生研究院资助的减少疼痛和阿片类药物使用的双盲研究的一部分,在两个郊区的脊椎按摩中心就诊的中重度腰痛患者被随机分配接受M-Stim装置或经皮神经电刺激(TENS)单元,每天30分钟,此外还有其他治疗。每天使用镇痛药28天,每周开新处方,持续3个月。主要结果是opioid-naïve受试者的处方。次要终点包括opioid-naïve受试者长期使用的危险因素,阿片类药物使用者在最初和最后2周之间的吗啡当量毫克(MME),以及与全国处方率的比较。结果:在知情同意后,159例符合条件的患者在2022年6月23日至2023年12月31日期间随机分为M-Stim(87例)或TENS(72例)(平均年龄42.6岁,54%为女性,BMI 30.9, NRS 5.5)。零opioid-naïve M-Stim参与者(n = 43)接受处方(0%比8.6%,Fisher精确p = 0.086),服用阿片类药物的患者使用的MME显著减少[7.5 (SD 3.54)比498.5 MME (SD 474.9), p n = 36,38 /102 (37%), RR 0.11 (95% CI 0.28-0.44), p = 0.0018]。M-Stim显著降低阿片类药物使用者的MME [-44.6% (32.33 MME), p = 0.02]、BMI≥30者的用药天数[-3 (99% CI -5.73 ~ -0.26), p = 0.032],以及与全国处方率相比的处方率[9.8% vs. 25%, -63%, RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.16 ~ 0.66), p = 0.002],而TENS则没有。结论:在中重度下腰痛的整脊患者中,opioid-naïve受试者中增加使用多模M-Stim装置与TENS相比,显著降低了与OUD相关的因素,并且BMI≥30的受试者减少了使用天数。这种新颖的装置是处方阿片类药物作为LBP管理一线的潜在替代方案。临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04491175,标识符NCT04491175。
{"title":"Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a randomized-controlled trial.","authors":"Amy L Baxter, Jena L Etnoyer-Slaski, Jessica Allia Rice Williams, Kevin Swartout, Lindsey L Cohen, M Louise Lawson","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1612572","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1612572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is the most common reason for outpatient opioid prescribing: a quarter of patients receive prescriptions, leading to opioid use disorder (OUD) in 5%. Guideline-recommended multimodal interventions often face implementation barriers, and effective modalities (e.g., electrical stimulation) lack coverage. A multimodal mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) device for LBP has demonstrated safety and efficacy in pain reduction, but its impact on opioid use has not yet been determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of an NIH-funded double-blind study to reduce pain and opioid use, patients with moderate-to-severe LBP presenting to two suburban chiropractic centers were randomized to receive either the M-Stim device or a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit for 30 min daily, in addition to other therapies. Analgesic use was reported daily for 28 days, with new prescribing followed weekly for 3 months. The primary outcome was prescribing in the opioid-naïve subjects. Secondary endpoints included risk factors for prolonged use in the opioid-naïve subjects, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) for opioid users between the first and last 2 weeks, and prescribing compared with national rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After informed consent, 159 eligible patients were randomized to M-Stim (87) or TENS (72) (mean age 42.6 years, 54% female, BMI 30.9, NRS 5.5) between 23 June 2022 and 31 December 2023. Zero opioid-naïve M-Stim participants (<i>n</i> = 43) received prescriptions (0% vs. 8.6%, Fisher's exact <i>p</i> = 0.086), and those taking opioids used significantly fewer MME [7.5 (SD 3.54) vs. 498.5 MME (SD 474.9), <i>p</i> < 0.0001] for fewer of reported days [M-Stim 2/47 (4.2%)] compared with TENS [<i>n</i> = 36, 38/102 (37%), RR 0.11 (95% CI 0.28-0.44), <i>p</i> = 0.0018]. M-Stim significantly reduced MME in opioid users [-44.6% (32.33 MME), <i>p</i> = 0.02], use days for those with BMI ≥30 [-3 (99% CI -5.73 to -0.26), <i>p</i> = 0.032], and prescribing compared with national rates [9.8% vs. 25%, -63%, RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.66), <i>p</i> = 0.002] while TENS did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among chiropractic patients with moderate-to-severe LBP, added use of a multimodal M-Stim device in the opioid-naïve subjects significantly reduced factors associated with OUD compared with TENS and reduced use days for those with BMI ≥30. This novel device is a potential alternative to prescribing opioids as first line for LBP management.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04491175, identifier NCT04491175.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1612572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287057/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144710040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1