首页 > 最新文献

Frontiers in reproductive health最新文献

英文 中文
Gender differences in dealing with recurrent implantation failure after fertility treatments: a foundation for adequate support models. 处理生育治疗后复发性着床失败的性别差异:适当支持模式的基础。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1698380
Pascale Stucki, Michèle Meier, Sarah Charlotte Maria di Giacopo, Kurt Birchler, Brigitte Leeners

Background: Understanding patients' needs is mandatory to optimize medical support. Previous research has identified differences in male and female coping strategies. As embryo implantation failure poses a burden for both partners and as an intact partnership is beneficial to overcome infertility, support models should adjust to the needs of both partners. Psychosocial reactions to recurrent failure of fertility treatments were identified as one of the important but under-researched topics in reproductive medicine, and especially knowledge on gender-specific reactions to recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is sparse. We therefore explored male and female emotional/ psychosocial reactions and coping strategies in RIF.

Methods: Women and men from heterosexual couples, where embryo transfers failed to result in pregnancy at least three consecutive times, participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Qualitative content analysis was conducted according to the content structuring model of Kuckartz and Rädiker.

Results: Dyadic influence in conversation was apparent, with women being more verbally inclined with a vivid narrative style. Men showed a lower intensity and variety of emotional and psychosocial reactions with disappointment being dominant. Greater optimism, little negative impact on quality of life, and sexuality were key male findings. Feelings of guilt were significantly more common among women. Unexpectedly, gender differences in coping strategies were less pronounced, and shared strategies emerged.

Discussion/conclusions: Experiences with RIF of affected women cannot be directly applied to male partners as men's emotional and psychosocial consequences differ in extent and quality. This gender gap should be considered to improve clinical practice.

背景:了解患者的需求是优化医疗支持的必要条件。之前的研究已经发现了男性和女性在应对策略上的差异。由于胚胎着床失败对双方都是负担,而完整的伴侣关系有利于克服不孕症,因此支持模式应根据双方的需求进行调整。生育治疗反复失败后的社会心理反应是生殖医学中一个重要但研究不足的课题,特别是关于反复植入失败的性别特异性反应的知识很少。因此,我们探讨了男性和女性在RIF中的情绪/社会心理反应和应对策略。方法:来自至少连续三次胚胎移植失败的异性恋夫妇的女性和男性参加定性半结构化访谈。根据Kuckartz和Rädiker的内容结构模型进行定性内容分析。结果:对话中的二元影响是明显的,女性更倾向于用生动的叙事风格说话。男性表现出较低的情绪和社会心理反应强度和多样性,以失望为主。男性的主要发现是更乐观、对生活质量的负面影响更小以及性生活。负罪感在女性中更为普遍。出乎意料的是,性别在应对策略上的差异不那么明显,出现了共同的策略。讨论/结论:受影响妇女的RIF经验不能直接应用于男性伴侣,因为男性的情感和社会心理后果在程度和质量上有所不同。应考虑到这种性别差异,以改善临床实践。
{"title":"Gender differences in dealing with recurrent implantation failure after fertility treatments: a foundation for adequate support models.","authors":"Pascale Stucki, Michèle Meier, Sarah Charlotte Maria di Giacopo, Kurt Birchler, Brigitte Leeners","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1698380","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1698380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding patients' needs is mandatory to optimize medical support. Previous research has identified differences in male and female coping strategies. As embryo implantation failure poses a burden for both partners and as an intact partnership is beneficial to overcome infertility, support models should adjust to the needs of both partners. Psychosocial reactions to recurrent failure of fertility treatments were identified as one of the important but under-researched topics in reproductive medicine, and especially knowledge on gender-specific reactions to recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is sparse. We therefore explored male and female emotional/ psychosocial reactions and coping strategies in RIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women and men from heterosexual couples, where embryo transfers failed to result in pregnancy at least three consecutive times, participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Qualitative content analysis was conducted according to the content structuring model of Kuckartz and Rädiker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyadic influence in conversation was apparent, with women being more verbally inclined with a vivid narrative style. Men showed a lower intensity and variety of emotional and psychosocial reactions with disappointment being dominant. Greater optimism, little negative impact on quality of life, and sexuality were key male findings. Feelings of guilt were significantly more common among women. Unexpectedly, gender differences in coping strategies were less pronounced, and shared strategies emerged.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>Experiences with RIF of affected women cannot be directly applied to male partners as men's emotional and psychosocial consequences differ in extent and quality. This gender gap should be considered to improve clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1698380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145662747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology) for infertility: take-home baby rate and clinical outcomes in a 5-year single-center cohort of 1,310 couples. 自然生殖技术(NaProTechnology)治疗不孕症:1310对夫妇5年单中心队列的带回家婴儿率和临床结果
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1696679
José Ignacio Sánchez-Méndez, María Lombarte, Ricardo Abengózar-Muela, Juan Acosta-Díez, Patricia Alonso-Fernández, María Pilar Cañones-Castañón, Olga Calderón-Ruiz, Elena Espinosa-García, Carolina Galocha-Morgado, Jaime Siegrist, Sonsoles Alonso-Salvador

Introduction: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are widely used to address infertility; however, they are costly, associated with medical risks, and often yield suboptimal clinical outcomes. Natural Procreative Technology, also known as NaProTechnology (NPT), provides a systematic and integrative approach to infertility by thoroughly identifying and treating underlying medical conditions to restore the couple's natural fertility potential. Despite its promise, real-world data on NPT effectiveness remain limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the take-home baby rate in a large population of infertile couples treated with NPT and to synthesize findings from previously published studies.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 1,310 infertile couples treated at a specialized fertility clinic in Spain over a 5-year period. Participants presented with primary or secondary infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Clinical data, diagnoses, and outcomes were analyzed, including surgical interventions and treatment duration.

Results: The mean age of women and men was 35.0 (SD 4.4) and 36.9 (SD 5.3) years, respectively. Primary infertility was the most common subtype (73.5%), the median infertility duration was 24 months, and prior ART attempts were recorded in 27.5% of couples. Mean number of diagnoses per couple was 2.5 (SD 1.3). The crude take-home baby rate was 35.3% (N = 463). Independent predictors of successful take-home baby included female age, recurrent pregnancy loss as the reason for consultation, duration of infertility, and the presence of endometriosis, hormonal dysfunction, male factor, and endometrial disorders as diagnoses. Considering a median duration of NPT of 10.9 months (range 8.1-17.0), the adjusted cumulative take-home baby rate was 62.1%. Rates varied significantly by female age, with higher success observed in younger women: 83.7% at 18-30 years, 53.3% at 36-40 years, and 24.4% over 40 years. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of dropout assumptions on cumulative pregnancy rates. Nearly one-third of patients underwent surgery, most commonly hysteroscopy and/or laparoscopy.

Conclusion: In this cohort, NPT was associated with a notably high take-home baby rate in an infertile population with unfavorable prognostic factors, including advanced maternal age, prolonged duration of infertility, or previous failed attempts at conventional ART procedures.

导言:辅助生殖技术(ART)被广泛用于治疗不孕症;然而,它们成本高昂,与医疗风险相关,而且往往产生不理想的临床结果。自然生殖技术,也被称为NaProTechnology (NPT),通过彻底识别和治疗潜在的医疗条件来恢复夫妇的自然生育潜力,为不孕症提供了系统和综合的方法。尽管《不扩散核武器条约》做出了承诺,但有关其有效性的实际数据仍然有限。本研究的目的是评估大量接受NPT治疗的不育夫妇带回家的婴儿率,并综合以前发表的研究结果。方法:一项回顾性队列研究涉及1310对不育夫妇在西班牙一个专门的生育诊所治疗5年。参与者表现为原发性或继发性不孕或复发性妊娠丢失。分析临床资料、诊断和结果,包括手术干预和治疗时间。结果:女性和男性的平均年龄分别为35.0 (SD 4.4)和36.9 (SD 5.3)岁。原发性不孕是最常见的亚型(73.5%),中位不孕持续时间为24个月,27.5%的夫妇曾尝试过抗逆转录病毒治疗。每对夫妇平均诊断2.5例(标准差1.3)。粗带回家婴儿率为35.3% (N = 463)。成功带回家婴儿的独立预测因素包括女性年龄,作为咨询原因的复发性流产,不孕症的持续时间,子宫内膜异位症,激素功能障碍,男性因素和子宫内膜疾病的诊断。考虑到NPT的中位持续时间为10.9个月(范围8.1-17.0),调整后的累计带回家婴儿率为62.1%。不同年龄的女性成功率差异显著,年轻女性的成功率更高:18-30岁为83.7%,36-40岁为53.3%,40岁以上为24.4%。进行敏感性分析以评估退出假设对累积妊娠率的影响。近三分之一的患者接受了手术,最常见的是宫腔镜和/或腹腔镜检查。结论:在这个队列中,NPT与具有不利预后因素的不育人群的高带回家婴儿率相关,这些不利预后因素包括高龄产妇、不孕持续时间延长或以前尝试常规ART手术失败。
{"title":"Natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology) for infertility: take-home baby rate and clinical outcomes in a 5-year single-center cohort of 1,310 couples.","authors":"José Ignacio Sánchez-Méndez, María Lombarte, Ricardo Abengózar-Muela, Juan Acosta-Díez, Patricia Alonso-Fernández, María Pilar Cañones-Castañón, Olga Calderón-Ruiz, Elena Espinosa-García, Carolina Galocha-Morgado, Jaime Siegrist, Sonsoles Alonso-Salvador","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1696679","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1696679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are widely used to address infertility; however, they are costly, associated with medical risks, and often yield suboptimal clinical outcomes. Natural Procreative Technology, also known as NaProTechnology (NPT), provides a systematic and integrative approach to infertility by thoroughly identifying and treating underlying medical conditions to restore the couple's natural fertility potential. Despite its promise, real-world data on NPT effectiveness remain limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the take-home baby rate in a large population of infertile couples treated with NPT and to synthesize findings from previously published studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 1,310 infertile couples treated at a specialized fertility clinic in Spain over a 5-year period. Participants presented with primary or secondary infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Clinical data, diagnoses, and outcomes were analyzed, including surgical interventions and treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of women and men was 35.0 (SD 4.4) and 36.9 (SD 5.3) years, respectively. Primary infertility was the most common subtype (73.5%), the median infertility duration was 24 months, and prior ART attempts were recorded in 27.5% of couples. Mean number of diagnoses per couple was 2.5 (SD 1.3). The crude take-home baby rate was 35.3% (<i>N</i> = 463). Independent predictors of successful take-home baby included female age, recurrent pregnancy loss as the reason for consultation, duration of infertility, and the presence of endometriosis, hormonal dysfunction, male factor, and endometrial disorders as diagnoses. Considering a median duration of NPT of 10.9 months (range 8.1-17.0), the adjusted cumulative take-home baby rate was 62.1%. Rates varied significantly by female age, with higher success observed in younger women: 83.7% at 18-30 years, 53.3% at 36-40 years, and 24.4% over 40 years. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of dropout assumptions on cumulative pregnancy rates. Nearly one-third of patients underwent surgery, most commonly hysteroscopy and/or laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, NPT was associated with a notably high take-home baby rate in an infertile population with unfavorable prognostic factors, including advanced maternal age, prolonged duration of infertility, or previous failed attempts at conventional ART procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1696679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660242/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145650273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic variation associated with side effects of hormonal contraception exposure: a narrative review. 与激素避孕副作用相关的遗传变异:一个叙述性的回顾。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1720994
Mariah Nuzzo, Elise N Erickson, Susan W Groth, Yang Yu, Theresa Koleck, Huashi Li, Kiana Martinez, Adnin Zaman, Caitlin Dreisbach

Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) are commonly prescribed medications that have had immeasurable impacts on quality of life and health of women and families globally. However, usage of exogenous hormones is not without risks, and patients often report a variety of side effects, ranging from burdensome to life-threatening. For some patients, side effects of HCs are severe enough to cause medication discontinuation or switching to alternative forms of contraception. Variability in side effect profiles may indicate heritable risk factors for some side effects. Understanding these patterns or risk profiles may help clinicians anticipate severe adverse events, match patients with suitable medications more rapidly, and improve patient outcomes and adherence. To support further research in this field, this narative review summarizes what is currently known about pharmacogenetic interactions with respect to HCs and specific polymorphisms suspected to contribute to adverse side effects and outcomes.

激素避孕药是常用的处方药,对全球妇女和家庭的生活质量和健康产生了不可估量的影响。然而,外源性激素的使用并非没有风险,患者经常报告各种副作用,从负担过重到危及生命。对于一些患者,hcc的副作用严重到足以导致停药或改用其他避孕方式。副作用特征的可变性可能表明某些副作用的遗传风险因素。了解这些模式或风险概况可以帮助临床医生预测严重的不良事件,更快地为患者匹配合适的药物,并改善患者的预后和依从性。为了支持这一领域的进一步研究,本综述总结了目前已知的与hcc相关的药物遗传相互作用和可能导致不良副作用和结果的特定多态性。
{"title":"Genetic variation associated with side effects of hormonal contraception exposure: a narrative review.","authors":"Mariah Nuzzo, Elise N Erickson, Susan W Groth, Yang Yu, Theresa Koleck, Huashi Li, Kiana Martinez, Adnin Zaman, Caitlin Dreisbach","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1720994","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1720994","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) are commonly prescribed medications that have had immeasurable impacts on quality of life and health of women and families globally. However, usage of exogenous hormones is not without risks, and patients often report a variety of side effects, ranging from burdensome to life-threatening. For some patients, side effects of HCs are severe enough to cause medication discontinuation or switching to alternative forms of contraception. Variability in side effect profiles may indicate heritable risk factors for some side effects. Understanding these patterns or risk profiles may help clinicians anticipate severe adverse events, match patients with suitable medications more rapidly, and improve patient outcomes and adherence. To support further research in this field, this narative review summarizes what is currently known about pharmacogenetic interactions with respect to HCs and specific polymorphisms suspected to contribute to adverse side effects and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1720994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660243/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145650298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence and determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa: an umbrella review. 非洲育龄妇女堕胎后计划生育利用的证据和决定因素:概括性审查。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1687886
Doreen Kainyu Kaura, Dereje Bayissa Demissie, Stefan Gebhardt
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-abortion family planning (PAFP), ideally initiated within 48 h, is crucial for preventing unplanned pregnancies. Repeat-induced abortion remains a significant challenge to the sexual and reproductive health of women. Despite numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, inconsistent findings still hinder effective policy formulation and clinical decision-making. In Africa, high rates of unsafe abortion and unintended pregnancy persist, exacerbated by socioeconomic and health system barriers. This umbrella review consolidates global evidence on the prevalence, determinants, and use of PAFP to inform health policy, strengthen service delivery, and promote reproductive health equity, especially in regions with limited access to safe abortion services and contraception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on observational studies was conducted. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect size, with analyses performed using Stata version 19. Subgroup analyses were performed by country and continent. Pooled results were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251089314).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>This umbrella review included six systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comprising 198 primary studies conducted across 44 African countries, with a combined sample size of 420,832 women of reproductive age assessing post-abortion family planning utilization. This umbrella review found that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa was 62.82% (95% CI: 59.24%-66.40%), indicating substantial uptake but with high heterogeneity across studies (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 98.81%). A subgroup umbrella meta-analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization was 69.31% (95% CI: 64.27%-74.35%) in Ethiopia, compared to 60.29% (95% CI: 57.11%-63.47%) in other African countries. This study determined that injectables were the most commonly utilized post-abortion family planning method (34.12%), followed by pills and implants, each with a nearly equal share of 22%. This umbrella review identified key pooled determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa, including marital status (being married), younger maternal age (15-24 years), educational attainment, receipt of post-abortion family planning counseling, prior use of family planning, history of abortion, unintended pregnancy, and contraceptive knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation:
背景:流产后计划生育(PAFP),理想情况下在48小时内开始,是预防意外怀孕的关键。反复人工流产仍然是对妇女性健康和生殖健康的重大挑战。尽管有大量的系统综述和荟萃分析,但不一致的发现仍然阻碍了有效的政策制定和临床决策。在非洲,不安全堕胎和意外怀孕的高比例持续存在,社会经济和卫生系统障碍加剧了这一现象。这一总括性审查整合了关于PAFP的流行、决定因素和使用的全球证据,为卫生政策提供信息,加强服务提供,促进生殖健康公平,特别是在获得安全堕胎服务和避孕药具有限的地区。方法:对基于观察性研究的系统综述和荟萃分析进行综合综述。使用多重系统评价工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。异质性采用Cochran’s Q和i2统计量进行评估,发表偏倚采用Egger’s检验和漏斗图进行评估。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计合并效应大小,使用Stata version 19进行分析。按国家和大洲进行亚组分析。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型对合并结果进行综合。审查方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251089314)。结果:该总括性综述包括六项系统综述和荟萃分析,包括在44个非洲国家进行的198项主要研究,总样本量为420,832名育龄妇女,评估了堕胎后计划生育的利用情况。该综合综述发现,非洲育龄妇女堕胎后计划生育利用的总流行率为62.82% (95% CI: 59.24%-66.40%),表明大量使用计划生育,但各研究之间存在高度异质性(I 2 = 98.81%)。亚组总体荟萃分析显示,埃塞俄比亚堕胎后计划生育使用率为69.31% (95% CI: 64.27%-74.35%),而其他非洲国家为60.29% (95% CI: 57.11%-63.47%)。本研究确定,注射是流产后最常用的计划生育方法(34.12%),其次是避孕药和植入物,各占22%,几乎相等。本综述确定了非洲育龄妇女堕胎后计划生育利用的关键综合决定因素,包括婚姻状况(已婚)、较年轻的产妇年龄(15-24岁)、受教育程度、堕胎后计划生育咨询的接受情况、之前的计划生育使用情况、堕胎史、意外怀孕和避孕知识。结论和建议:PAFP的高使用率在非洲(62.82%),特别是在埃塞俄比亚(69.31%),反映了令人鼓舞的进展。然而,非洲37.18%的堕胎后妇女和埃塞俄比亚30.69%的堕胎后妇女仍然没有使用PAFP,这一事实凸显了一个严重的差距,需要有针对性的政策行动。注射避孕药具占主导地位的情况突出表明,需要扩大获得更广泛方法的机会,包括长效可逆避孕药具,以支持知情和自愿选择。非洲的决策者和卫生规划人员应紧急加强生殖健康政策,实施一项全面、多管齐下的战略,确保普遍获得堕胎后护理。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251089314, PROSPERO CRD420251089314。
{"title":"Evidence and determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa: an umbrella review.","authors":"Doreen Kainyu Kaura, Dereje Bayissa Demissie, Stefan Gebhardt","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1687886","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1687886","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Post-abortion family planning (PAFP), ideally initiated within 48 h, is crucial for preventing unplanned pregnancies. Repeat-induced abortion remains a significant challenge to the sexual and reproductive health of women. Despite numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, inconsistent findings still hinder effective policy formulation and clinical decision-making. In Africa, high rates of unsafe abortion and unintended pregnancy persist, exacerbated by socioeconomic and health system barriers. This umbrella review consolidates global evidence on the prevalence, determinants, and use of PAFP to inform health policy, strengthen service delivery, and promote reproductive health equity, especially in regions with limited access to safe abortion services and contraception.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on observational studies was conducted. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect size, with analyses performed using Stata version 19. Subgroup analyses were performed by country and continent. Pooled results were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251089314).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Result: &lt;/strong&gt;This umbrella review included six systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comprising 198 primary studies conducted across 44 African countries, with a combined sample size of 420,832 women of reproductive age assessing post-abortion family planning utilization. This umbrella review found that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa was 62.82% (95% CI: 59.24%-66.40%), indicating substantial uptake but with high heterogeneity across studies (&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 98.81%). A subgroup umbrella meta-analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization was 69.31% (95% CI: 64.27%-74.35%) in Ethiopia, compared to 60.29% (95% CI: 57.11%-63.47%) in other African countries. This study determined that injectables were the most commonly utilized post-abortion family planning method (34.12%), followed by pills and implants, each with a nearly equal share of 22%. This umbrella review identified key pooled determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa, including marital status (being married), younger maternal age (15-24 years), educational attainment, receipt of post-abortion family planning counseling, prior use of family planning, history of abortion, unintended pregnancy, and contraceptive knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion and recommendation:","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1687886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12657429/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145650258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Precision pharmacology in menopause: advances, challenges, and future innovations for personalized management. 绝经期精准药理学:个性化管理的进展、挑战和未来创新。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1694240
Zhi-Qing Guo

Menopause, characterized by ovarian function cessation and estrogen decline, affects over a billion women globally, leading to vasomotor symptoms (VMS), genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), mood disturbances, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular risks. Pharmacological management is essential for symptom alleviation and long-term health, yet debates on hormone therapy risks necessitate personalized approaches. This review synthesizes recent advances in menopause pharmacology, evaluating hormonal therapies, non-hormonal alternatives, emerging options, challenges, and future directions. A systematic literature search, following PRISMA guidelines, was conducted via PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (2015-2025) using keywords like "menopause pharmacological therapy," "hormone replacement risks," "non-hormonal VMS treatments," and "ovarian aging modulators." Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full texts, including RCTs, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses focused on efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms; exclusions applied to non-English or pre-2015 studies. Hormonal therapies (MHT/HRT), evolved from WHI trials, effectively reduce VMS by 70%-90% and preserve bone density via estrogen receptor modulation, with low-dose transdermal regimens minimizing VTE and breast cancer risks per NAMS/IMS guidelines. Non-hormonal options like SSRIs/SNRIs (40%-60% efficacy) and NK3R antagonists (fezolinetant, 50%-65% VMS reduction) suit contraindicated patients. Emerging therapies, including phytoestrogens, testosterone for libido, and ovarian aging modulators (e.g., AMH analogs), address unmet needs. Special populations (e.g., POI, cancer survivors) require tailored strategies, while challenges include access inequities and long-term data gaps. Advancements underscore precision pharmacology's shift to individualized, non-hormonal treatments. Future priorities: biomarker-guided personalization, AI-driven discovery, and novel delivery systems to enhance efficacy, reduce risks, and improve QoL for menopausal women.

更年期以卵巢功能停止和雌激素下降为特征,影响全球超过10亿女性,导致血管舒缩症状(VMS)、更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)、情绪障碍、骨质疏松症和心血管风险。药理学管理是必不可少的症状缓解和长期健康,但争论激素治疗的风险需要个性化的方法。本文综述了更年期药理学的最新进展,评估激素治疗,非激素替代,新出现的选择,挑战和未来的方向。根据PRISMA指南,通过PubMed、Cochrane Library和Web of Science(2015-2025)进行了系统的文献检索,关键词包括“更年期药物治疗”、“激素替代风险”、“非激素VMS治疗”和“卵巢衰老调节剂”。两位独立审稿人筛选了摘要和全文,包括随机对照试验、荟萃分析和专家共识,重点关注疗效、安全性、药代动力学和机制;排除适用于非英语或2015年之前的研究。激素疗法(MHT/HRT)从WHI试验发展而来,通过雌激素受体调节有效降低VMS 70%-90%,并保持骨密度,根据NAMS/IMS指南,低剂量透皮治疗方案可最大限度地降低静脉血栓栓塞和乳腺癌风险。非激素选择如SSRIs/SNRIs(40%-60%疗效)和NK3R拮抗剂(非唑啉奈坦,50%-65% VMS降低)适合禁忌患者。新兴疗法,包括植物雌激素、用于性欲的睾酮和卵巢衰老调节剂(如AMH类似物),解决了未满足的需求。特殊人群(如POI、癌症幸存者)需要量身定制的战略,而挑战包括获取不平等和长期数据缺口。这些进步强调了精准药理学向个性化、非激素治疗的转变。未来的重点:生物标志物引导的个性化,人工智能驱动的发现,以及新的给药系统,以提高绝经妇女的疗效,降低风险,改善生活质量。
{"title":"Precision pharmacology in menopause: advances, challenges, and future innovations for personalized management.","authors":"Zhi-Qing Guo","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1694240","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1694240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Menopause, characterized by ovarian function cessation and estrogen decline, affects over a billion women globally, leading to vasomotor symptoms (VMS), genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), mood disturbances, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular risks. Pharmacological management is essential for symptom alleviation and long-term health, yet debates on hormone therapy risks necessitate personalized approaches. This review synthesizes recent advances in menopause pharmacology, evaluating hormonal therapies, non-hormonal alternatives, emerging options, challenges, and future directions. A systematic literature search, following PRISMA guidelines, was conducted via PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (2015-2025) using keywords like \"menopause pharmacological therapy,\" \"hormone replacement risks,\" \"non-hormonal VMS treatments,\" and \"ovarian aging modulators.\" Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full texts, including RCTs, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses focused on efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms; exclusions applied to non-English or pre-2015 studies. Hormonal therapies (MHT/HRT), evolved from WHI trials, effectively reduce VMS by 70%-90% and preserve bone density via estrogen receptor modulation, with low-dose transdermal regimens minimizing VTE and breast cancer risks per NAMS/IMS guidelines. Non-hormonal options like SSRIs/SNRIs (40%-60% efficacy) and NK3R antagonists (fezolinetant, 50%-65% VMS reduction) suit contraindicated patients. Emerging therapies, including phytoestrogens, testosterone for libido, and ovarian aging modulators (e.g., AMH analogs), address unmet needs. Special populations (e.g., POI, cancer survivors) require tailored strategies, while challenges include access inequities and long-term data gaps. Advancements underscore precision pharmacology's shift to individualized, non-hormonal treatments. Future priorities: biomarker-guided personalization, AI-driven discovery, and novel delivery systems to enhance efficacy, reduce risks, and improve QoL for menopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1694240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12657360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145650255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors of attrition: comparison in two final waves of a birth cohort study in Ecuador. 社会人口学特征和减员的预测因素:厄瓜多尔出生队列研究最后两波的比较。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1605182
Nataly Cadena, Alexis J Handal, Fabián Muñoz, Fadya Orozco

Background: Birth cohort studies are essential to investigate maternal and child health outcomes, yet they face persistent methodological challenges. A major concern is attrition, as participant loss over successive waves can compromise validity and introduce bias. These challenges are particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries, where socioeconomic inequalities and structural barriers further exacerbate participant loss and complicate long-term follow-up.

Objective: This paper compares attrition between participants who remained and those who dropped out of the birth cohort study, SEMILLA. We analyze reasons for drop out, and the sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors associated with attrition.

Material and methods: Recruitment occurred over 30 months. Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and social conflicts between 2019 and 2022 affected the final follow-up. The baseline sample included 409 pregnant women, divided into two Final Waves (FW): FW1 completed participation up to the baby's 12 months (n = 115), and FW2 up to 18 months (n = 294). Dropouts were identified by miscarriage, loss to follow-up, voluntary withdrawal, or protocol non-compliance. Baseline variables included ethnicity, years of schooling, maternal occupational activity, and per capita income. Attrition was calculated for each criterion overall and by Final Wave. Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson's chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tested differences between participants and dropouts. Logistic regression identified predictors of attrition in each Final Wave. All analyses were conducted with 95% confidence.

Results: Of 409 participants, 94 dropped out: 19 in FW1 and 75 in FW2. The main reasons were protocol non-compliance (54%), voluntary withdrawal (21%), miscarriage (13%), and loss to follow-up (12%). In FW1, younger age was associated with attrition (p = 0.031), while in FW2, Mestiza ethnicity (p = 0.037) and lower income (p = 0.014) were significant. Logistic regression showed that older maternal age (OR = 0.87, p = 0.026) and higher income (OR = 0.99, p = 0.034) predicted lower attrition.

Conclusion: Dropouts increased with longer follow-up, mainly due to time constraints. Age and income disparities significantly predicted continued participation. In contexts with socioeconomic challenges, these factors also affected protocol compliance. Findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic determinants to strengthen the validity and sustainability of longitudinal studies in similar settings.

背景:出生队列研究对调查孕产妇和儿童健康结果至关重要,但它们在方法学上面临着持续的挑战。一个主要的问题是人员流失,因为在连续的波中参与者的流失会损害有效性并引入偏差。这些挑战在低收入和中等收入国家尤为严重,在这些国家,社会经济不平等和结构性障碍进一步加剧了参与者的流失,并使长期后续工作复杂化。目的:本文比较了出生队列研究SEMILLA中留下来的参与者和退出的参与者之间的流失率。我们分析了辍学的原因,以及与流失相关的社会人口学特征和预测因素。材料和方法:招募时间超过30个月。2019年至2022年期间的COVID-19大流行和社会冲突等事件影响了最后的后续工作。基线样本包括409名孕妇,分为两个最后阶段(FW): FW1完成参与到婴儿12个月(n = 115), FW2完成参与到18个月(n = 294)。通过流产、失去随访、自愿退出或不遵守方案来确定退出。基线变量包括种族、受教育年限、母亲的职业活动和人均收入。流失率是根据每个标准来计算的。Fisher精确检验、Pearson卡方检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验了参与者和辍学者之间的差异。逻辑回归确定了每个最后一波的人员流失预测因素。所有分析均以95%的置信度进行。结果:在409名参与者中,94人退出:FW1 19人,FW2 75人。主要原因是治疗方案不符合(54%)、自愿停药(21%)、流产(13%)和随访失败(12%)。在FW1中,较年轻的年龄与磨损相关(p = 0.031),而在FW2中,mesestiza种族(p = 0.037)和较低的收入(p = 0.014)显著。Logistic回归结果显示,产妇年龄越大(OR = 0.87, p = 0.026)、收入越高(OR = 0.99, p = 0.034),产妇磨损率越低。结论:随着随访时间的延长,辍学率增加,主要是由于时间的限制。年龄和收入差异显著地预示着参与者的持续参与。在社会经济挑战的背景下,这些因素也会影响协议的遵守。研究结果强调了解决社会经济决定因素的重要性,以加强类似环境下纵向研究的有效性和可持续性。
{"title":"Sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors of attrition: comparison in two final waves of a birth cohort study in Ecuador.","authors":"Nataly Cadena, Alexis J Handal, Fabián Muñoz, Fadya Orozco","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1605182","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1605182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Birth cohort studies are essential to investigate maternal and child health outcomes, yet they face persistent methodological challenges. A major concern is attrition, as participant loss over successive waves can compromise validity and introduce bias. These challenges are particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries, where socioeconomic inequalities and structural barriers further exacerbate participant loss and complicate long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper compares attrition between participants who remained and those who dropped out of the birth cohort study, SEMILLA. We analyze reasons for drop out, and the sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors associated with attrition.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Recruitment occurred over 30 months. Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and social conflicts between 2019 and 2022 affected the final follow-up. The baseline sample included 409 pregnant women, divided into two Final Waves (FW): FW1 completed participation up to the baby's 12 months (<i>n</i> = 115), and FW2 up to 18 months (<i>n</i> = 294). Dropouts were identified by miscarriage, loss to follow-up, voluntary withdrawal, or protocol non-compliance. Baseline variables included ethnicity, years of schooling, maternal occupational activity, and per capita income. Attrition was calculated for each criterion overall and by Final Wave. Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson's chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tested differences between participants and dropouts. Logistic regression identified predictors of attrition in each Final Wave. All analyses were conducted with 95% confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 409 participants, 94 dropped out: 19 in FW1 and 75 in FW2. The main reasons were protocol non-compliance (54%), voluntary withdrawal (21%), miscarriage (13%), and loss to follow-up (12%). In FW1, younger age was associated with attrition (<i>p</i> = 0.031), while in FW2, Mestiza ethnicity (<i>p</i> = 0.037) and lower income (<i>p</i> = 0.014) were significant. Logistic regression showed that older maternal age (OR = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and higher income (OR = 0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.034) predicted lower attrition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dropouts increased with longer follow-up, mainly due to time constraints. Age and income disparities significantly predicted continued participation. In contexts with socioeconomic challenges, these factors also affected protocol compliance. Findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic determinants to strengthen the validity and sustainability of longitudinal studies in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1605182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12657497/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145650330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contraceptive use among adolescent girls and young women ages 15-24 in seven high HIV prevalence countries. 7个艾滋病毒高流行国家15-24岁少女和年轻妇女的避孕措施使用情况。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1667613
Abigail R Greenleaf, Karam Sachathep, Emma Geisler, Tara F Abularrage, Giles A Reid, Felix Ndagije, Tepa Nkumbula, Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha, Elaine Abrams, Neena M Philip

Background: Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW; ages 15-24) continue to use contraceptives at lower rates than older women in sub-Saharan Africa. We describe contraceptive use among AGYW in seven Southern African countries (Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe).

Methods: Cross-sectional, nationally representative household-based data from seven Population-based HIV Impact Assessment surveys (conducted between November 2019 and February 2022) were analyzed using survey weights to create descriptive results and pooled odds of modern contraceptive use.

Results: Among the 11,094 AGYW, contraceptive use (male or female sterilization, IUD, implants, injectables, pills, condoms) ranged from 45.0% in Mozambique to 75.1% in Botswana. Condoms were the most frequently reported method in four of seven countries (Botswana 61% of those using modern methods use condoms, Eswatini 66%, Lesotho 49% and Mozambique 33%). Dual method (use of any modern contraceptive method plus a condom) ranged from <1% in Malawi to 15% in Botswana. When conducting a pooled multivariable logistic regression, higher odds of modern contraceptive use was associated with higher education [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.5-2.0], being in the highest wealth quintile (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2- 2.0), and having children (one birth: OR 2.0 95% CI 1.7-2.4), two or more: (2.5, 95% CI 2.0-3.0), but was lower among AGYW living with HIV (OR 0.7 95% CI 0.6-0.9).

Conclusions: Contraceptive prevalence rates varied by country but across countries, AGYW in Southern Africa commonly use short-acting methods, and specifically condoms: a user-dependent method prone to inconsistent use. Efforts to expand access to diverse, youth-friendly contraceptive options - particularly short-acting and multipurpose methods - could better align with the needs of AGYW. These findings can inform policies and programs aiming to reduce unmet contraceptive need and improve reproductive health outcomes among AGYW in the region.

背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲,少女和年轻妇女(AGYW; 15-24岁)继续以低于老年妇女的比例使用避孕药具。我们描述了七个南部非洲国家(博茨瓦纳、斯威士兰、莱索托、马拉维、莫桑比克、赞比亚和津巴布韦)AGYW的避孕措施使用情况。方法:使用调查权重分析来自7项基于人口的艾滋病毒影响评估调查(2019年11月至2022年2月进行)的全国代表性家庭数据,以创建描述性结果和汇总现代避孕药具使用的几率。结果:在11,094名AGYW中,避孕措施的使用率(男性或女性绝育、宫内节育器、植入物、注射剂、药丸、避孕套)从莫桑比克的45.0%到博茨瓦纳的75.1%不等。在7个国家中,有4个国家最常报告使用避孕套(博茨瓦纳61%使用现代避孕方法的人使用避孕套,斯威士兰66%,莱索托49%,莫桑比克33%)。结论:避孕普及率因国家而异,但在各国之间,南部非洲的AGYW通常使用短效方法,特别是避孕套:一种用户依赖的方法,容易使用不一致。努力扩大对青年友好的多种避孕方法的可及性,特别是短效和多用途避孕方法,可以更好地符合《全球妇女行动计划》的需要。这些发现可以为旨在减少未满足的避孕需求和改善该地区AGYW的生殖健康结果的政策和规划提供信息。
{"title":"Contraceptive use among adolescent girls and young women ages 15-24 in seven high HIV prevalence countries.","authors":"Abigail R Greenleaf, Karam Sachathep, Emma Geisler, Tara F Abularrage, Giles A Reid, Felix Ndagije, Tepa Nkumbula, Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha, Elaine Abrams, Neena M Philip","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1667613","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1667613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW; ages 15-24) continue to use contraceptives at lower rates than older women in sub-Saharan Africa. We describe contraceptive use among AGYW in seven Southern African countries (Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, nationally representative household-based data from seven Population-based HIV Impact Assessment surveys (conducted between November 2019 and February 2022) were analyzed using survey weights to create descriptive results and pooled odds of modern contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 11,094 AGYW, contraceptive use (male or female sterilization, IUD, implants, injectables, pills, condoms) ranged from 45.0% in Mozambique to 75.1% in Botswana. Condoms were the most frequently reported method in four of seven countries (Botswana 61% of those using modern methods use condoms, Eswatini 66%, Lesotho 49% and Mozambique 33%). Dual method (use of any modern contraceptive method plus a condom) ranged from <1% in Malawi to 15% in Botswana. When conducting a pooled multivariable logistic regression, higher odds of modern contraceptive use was associated with higher education [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.5-2.0], being in the highest wealth quintile (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2- 2.0), and having children (one birth: OR 2.0 95% CI 1.7-2.4), two or more: (2.5, 95% CI 2.0-3.0), but was lower among AGYW living with HIV (OR 0.7 95% CI 0.6-0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contraceptive prevalence rates varied by country but across countries, AGYW in Southern Africa commonly use short-acting methods, and specifically condoms: a user-dependent method prone to inconsistent use. Efforts to expand access to diverse, youth-friendly contraceptive options - particularly short-acting and multipurpose methods - could better align with the needs of AGYW. These findings can inform policies and programs aiming to reduce unmet contraceptive need and improve reproductive health outcomes among AGYW in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1667613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644067/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regional variations and socioeconomic factors influencing sex hormone profiles in adolescent girls in Ghana. 影响加纳少女性激素状况的区域差异和社会经济因素。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1579942
Eric Kyei-Baafour, Sawudatu Zakariah-Akoto, Michael Ofori, Lutherodt Bentum-Ennin, Oscar Nii Otto Darko, Godfred Egbi, Benjamin Abuaku, Collins Ahorlu, Dorothy Yeboah-Manu

Introduction: Adolescence is a critical period of hormonal changes that affect growth, development, and behaviour. Estrogen, progesterone, and androgen are sex hormones that play important roles in reproductive development and functions. Factors including diet, Health care, and genetic variation, affect hormone production/levels. However, the effect of different environments has not been explored in detail. This study aimed to evaluate hormonal levels in adolescent girls from two regions in Ghana and also assess associated socioeconomic status.

Method: One hundred and sixteen (116) blood samples were drawn from in-school adolescent girls aged 10-19 years who were involved in a qualitative study to explore adolescent girls' knowledge, perceptions and experiences of hormonal imbalance in Northern and Southern Ghana between June and October 2022. Their hormonal levels were assessed in respect of androgen, estrogen and progesterone to determine the influence of environmental and parents' socio-economic factors. Using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), serum levels were determined.

Results: Generally, average serum levels of estrogen, androgen, and progesterone were 195.5 (29.2-899.2.0) pg/ml, 60.7 (8.2-687.3) pg/ml, 46.0 (5.2-130.6) ng/ml respectively. When categorized by location, serum estrogen level was 195.8 (35.7-899.2) pg/ml in the north compared to 195.3 (29.2-899.2) pg/ml, in the south, p = 0.63. Androgen was 52.8 (8.2-687.3) pg/ml vs. 61.2 (16.0-683.33) pg/ml, p = 0.81, and progesterone level was 53.3 (9.2-130.6) ng/ml vs. 43.0 (5.2-111.3) ng/ml, p = 0.0019. Northern participants whose mothers did not have any formal education had higher androgen (p = 0.009) and estrogen (p = 0.0012) levels compared to those from the south. Also, girls with educated fathers had higher progesterone levels (p = 0.03). The proportion of parental unemployment was low across locations. Other covariates did not influence hormonal levels (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study provides useful information on the hormonal profiles of adolescent girls in Ghana which can inform the School Health Education Programme's (SHEP) intervention activities related to reproductive health issues. The study shows that there were some variations in the levels of serum progesterone between the two locations with participants from Northern Ghana having higher levels. It also highlights the need for practices that address the differences in hormonal levels among adolescent girls based on the educational levels of mothers, recognizing its potential implications for their health, fertility, and well-being.

青春期是影响生长、发育和行为的荷尔蒙变化的关键时期。雌激素、黄体酮和雄激素是在生殖发育和功能中起重要作用的性激素。包括饮食、保健和遗传变异在内的因素都会影响激素的产生/水平。然而,不同环境的影响并没有被详细探讨。本研究旨在评估加纳两个地区少女的荷尔蒙水平,并评估相关的社会经济地位。方法:从参与定性研究的10-19岁在校少女中抽取116份血液样本,以探讨2022年6月至10月期间加纳北部和南部少女对激素失衡的知识、感知和经历。评估了他们的激素水平,包括雄激素、雌激素和黄体酮,以确定环境和父母的社会经济因素的影响。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测定血清水平。结果:一般情况下,血清雌激素、雄激素、孕激素平均水平分别为195.5 (29.2 ~ 899.2.0)pg/ml、60.7 (8.2 ~ 687.3)pg/ml、46.0 (5.2 ~ 130.6)ng/ml。按地区分类,北方血清雌激素水平为195.8 (35.7-899.2)pg/ml,南方为195.3 (29.2-899.2)pg/ml, p = 0.63。雄激素52.8 (8.2 ~ 687.3)pg/ml vs. 61.2 (16.0 ~ 683.33) pg/ml, p = 0.81;黄体酮53.3 (9.2 ~ 130.6)ng/ml vs. 43.0 (5.2 ~ 111.3) ng/ml, p = 0.0019。母亲未受过任何正规教育的北方参与者的雄激素(p = 0.009)和雌激素(p = 0.0012)水平高于南方参与者。此外,父亲受过教育的女孩的孕酮水平较高(p = 0.03)。各地父母失业的比例都很低。其他协变量对激素水平无影响(p < 0.05)。结论:这项研究提供了关于加纳少女荷尔蒙状况的有用信息,可以为学校健康教育方案(SHEP)有关生殖健康问题的干预活动提供信息。研究表明,两个地区的血清黄体酮水平存在一些差异,来自加纳北部的参与者的血清黄体酮水平较高。它还强调需要采取措施,根据母亲的受教育程度解决少女荷尔蒙水平的差异,认识到这对她们的健康、生育能力和福祉的潜在影响。
{"title":"Regional variations and socioeconomic factors influencing sex hormone profiles in adolescent girls in Ghana.","authors":"Eric Kyei-Baafour, Sawudatu Zakariah-Akoto, Michael Ofori, Lutherodt Bentum-Ennin, Oscar Nii Otto Darko, Godfred Egbi, Benjamin Abuaku, Collins Ahorlu, Dorothy Yeboah-Manu","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1579942","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1579942","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescence is a critical period of hormonal changes that affect growth, development, and behaviour. Estrogen, progesterone, and androgen are sex hormones that play important roles in reproductive development and functions. Factors including diet, Health care, and genetic variation, affect hormone production/levels. However, the effect of different environments has not been explored in detail. This study aimed to evaluate hormonal levels in adolescent girls from two regions in Ghana and also assess associated socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and sixteen (116) blood samples were drawn from in-school adolescent girls aged 10-19 years who were involved in a qualitative study to explore adolescent girls' knowledge, perceptions and experiences of hormonal imbalance in Northern and Southern Ghana between June and October 2022. Their hormonal levels were assessed in respect of androgen, estrogen and progesterone to determine the influence of environmental and parents' socio-economic factors. Using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), serum levels were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, average serum levels of estrogen, androgen, and progesterone were 195.5 (29.2-899.2.0) pg/ml, 60.7 (8.2-687.3) pg/ml, 46.0 (5.2-130.6) ng/ml respectively. When categorized by location, serum estrogen level was 195.8 (35.7-899.2) pg/ml in the north compared to 195.3 (29.2-899.2) pg/ml, in the south, <i>p</i> = 0.63. Androgen was 52.8 (8.2-687.3) pg/ml vs. 61.2 (16.0-683.33) pg/ml, <i>p</i> = 0.81, and progesterone level was 53.3 (9.2-130.6) ng/ml vs. 43.0 (5.2-111.3) ng/ml, <i>p</i> = 0.0019. Northern participants whose mothers did not have any formal education had higher androgen (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and estrogen (<i>p</i> = 0.0012) levels compared to those from the south. Also, girls with educated fathers had higher progesterone levels (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The proportion of parental unemployment was low across locations. Other covariates did not influence hormonal levels (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides useful information on the hormonal profiles of adolescent girls in Ghana which can inform the School Health Education Programme's (SHEP) intervention activities related to reproductive health issues. The study shows that there were some variations in the levels of serum progesterone between the two locations with participants from Northern Ghana having higher levels. It also highlights the need for practices that address the differences in hormonal levels among adolescent girls based on the educational levels of mothers, recognizing its potential implications for their health, fertility, and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1579942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641014/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Women's preferences for integrating multi-product pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery programs within services for sexually transmitted infections and reproductive health care in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment. 乌干达妇女对将多种产品暴露前预防方案纳入性传播感染和生殖保健服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1688969
Brenda Kamusiime, Patricia M Smith, Alisaati Nalumansi, Tara E Wood, George Eram, Vicent Kasiita, Paul Ssendiwala, Agnes Nakyanzi, Felix Bambia, Timothy R Muwonge, Andrew Mujugira, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Renee Heffron

Introduction: HIV prevention is paramount for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Uganda, and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not always a suitable option. With emerging novel HIV prevention products (e.g., ring, injectables), there are opportunities to explore AGYW preferences to inform strategies for integrating PrEP choice into routine care.

Methods: From January-September 2024, we recruited AGYW aged 16-25 years from community sites in Kampala, Uganda for a cross-sectional discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine the most preferred attributes and levels of multi-product PrEP programs. The DCE was developed via literature review, informal conversations with AGYW, and cognitive interviewing among AGYW using a prototype instrument. In the final iteration, attributes (and levels) included: method of PrEP information dissemination (WhatsApp, brochure, in-person consultations), PrEP counseling delivery (virtual, group, in-person counselling), proximity of PrEP location (nearer to or far from work/school/home), type of facility (private or government clinic, pharmacy), availability of additional services (STI testing and treatment, family planning, no additional services), client wait times (5, 30, 90 min), and associated costs (small, none). Participants responded 9 times to the question "Which PrEP program would encourage you to use PrEP?" and each time a different set of randomly-assigned choices of 2 scenarios were presented. Multinomial logit modeling was used to estimate preference weights and importance scores.

Results: Of 343 AGYW screened, 300 consented to participate (median age: 21 years, IQR: 20-23), with 38.3% having oral PrEP experience and 71.7% reporting recent condomless sex. "Access to other services" in conjunction with PrEP dispensing had the greatest influence on PrEP program choice (importance score: 27%) with preferences for STI testing and treatment (preference weight: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.47) and family planning (PW: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.21) greater than stand-alone PrEP programs. The type of facility offering PrEP (importance score: 9.7%), method used for PrEP information dissemination (importance score: 10.2%), and proximity of the PrEP location (importance score: 6.9%) were not very influential.

Discussion: Young women's preference for PrEP services to be offered in conjunction with STI and/or reproductive health services indicates an opportunity to integrate current and future PrEP delivery within these existing services.

在乌干达,艾滋病毒预防对少女和年轻妇女至关重要,口服暴露前预防(PrEP)并不总是一种合适的选择。随着新型艾滋病毒预防产品(如环、注射剂)的出现,有机会探索AGYW的偏好,为将PrEP选择纳入常规护理的策略提供信息。方法:从2024年1月至9月,我们从乌干达坎帕拉的社区地点招募了16-25岁的AGYW,进行横断面离散选择实验(DCE),以确定多产品PrEP计划的最偏好属性和水平。DCE是通过文献综述、与AGYW的非正式对话以及使用原型工具对AGYW进行认知访谈来开发的。在最后的迭代中,属性(和级别)包括:预防措施信息传播方法(WhatsApp、宣传册、面对面咨询)、提供预防措施咨询(虚拟、小组、面对面咨询)、预防措施地点的邻近性(离工作/学校/家庭更近或更远)、设施类型(私人或政府诊所、药房)、额外服务的可获得性(性传播感染检测和治疗、计划生育、无额外服务)、客户等待时间(5分钟、30分钟、90分钟)和相关费用(很少,没有)。参与者对“哪个PrEP项目会鼓励你使用PrEP?”这个问题回答了9次,每次都给出了两种不同的随机选择。使用多项logit模型估计偏好权重和重要性得分。结果:在筛选的343名AGYW中,有300人同意参与(中位年龄:21岁,IQR: 20-23岁),其中38.3%的人有口服PrEP经验,71.7%的人报告最近有未使用安全套的性行为。“获得其他服务”与PrEP配药相结合对PrEP项目选择的影响最大(重要性得分:27%),对STI检测和治疗的偏好(偏好权重:0.39,95% CI: 0.32, 0.47)和计划生育(PW: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.21)大于独立的PrEP项目。提供PrEP的设施类型(重要性得分:9.7%)、PrEP信息传播方式(重要性得分:10.2%)和PrEP地点的邻近性(重要性得分:6.9%)的影响不大。讨论:青年妇女倾向于将预防措施服务与性传播感染和/或生殖健康服务结合起来提供,这表明有机会将目前和未来的预防措施服务纳入这些现有服务。
{"title":"Women's preferences for integrating multi-product pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery programs within services for sexually transmitted infections and reproductive health care in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Brenda Kamusiime, Patricia M Smith, Alisaati Nalumansi, Tara E Wood, George Eram, Vicent Kasiita, Paul Ssendiwala, Agnes Nakyanzi, Felix Bambia, Timothy R Muwonge, Andrew Mujugira, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Renee Heffron","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1688969","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1688969","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>HIV prevention is paramount for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Uganda, and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not always a suitable option. With emerging novel HIV prevention products (e.g., ring, injectables), there are opportunities to explore AGYW preferences to inform strategies for integrating PrEP choice into routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January-September 2024, we recruited AGYW aged 16-25 years from community sites in Kampala, Uganda for a cross-sectional discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine the most preferred attributes and levels of multi-product PrEP programs. The DCE was developed via literature review, informal conversations with AGYW, and cognitive interviewing among AGYW using a prototype instrument. In the final iteration, attributes (and levels) included: method of PrEP information dissemination (WhatsApp, brochure, in-person consultations), PrEP counseling delivery (virtual, group, in-person counselling), proximity of PrEP location (nearer to or far from work/school/home), type of facility (private or government clinic, pharmacy), availability of additional services (STI testing and treatment, family planning, no additional services), client wait times (5, 30, 90 min), and associated costs (small, none). Participants responded 9 times to the question \"Which PrEP program would encourage you to use PrEP?\" and each time a different set of randomly-assigned choices of 2 scenarios were presented. Multinomial logit modeling was used to estimate preference weights and importance scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 343 AGYW screened, 300 consented to participate (median age: 21 years, IQR: 20-23), with 38.3% having oral PrEP experience and 71.7% reporting recent condomless sex. \"Access to other services\" in conjunction with PrEP dispensing had the greatest influence on PrEP program choice (importance score: 27%) with preferences for STI testing and treatment (preference weight: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.47) and family planning (PW: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.21) greater than stand-alone PrEP programs. The type of facility offering PrEP (importance score: 9.7%), method used for PrEP information dissemination (importance score: 10.2%), and proximity of the PrEP location (importance score: 6.9%) were not very influential.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Young women's preference for PrEP services to be offered in conjunction with STI and/or reproductive health services indicates an opportunity to integrate current and future PrEP delivery within these existing services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1688969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12643002/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 先兆子痫、子痫和HELLP综合征的全球患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1706009
Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, Joan A Loayza-Castro, Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval, Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya, Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo

Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy represent a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, prevalence estimates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome vary considerably across studies and regions.

Objective: To determine the global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelet count) syndrome, analyze their geographical distribution, and evaluate temporal and methodological trends.

Methodology: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched through May 2025. Observational studies reporting prevalence data using standardized diagnostic criteria were included. Prevalences were pooled using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analyses by diagnostic criteria and countries and meta-regressions by publication year and sample size were performed.

Results: Seventy studies on preeclampsia (2,465,570 participants), 21 on eclampsia (9,782,257 participants), and nine on HELLP syndrome (133,611 participants) were analyzed. The global prevalence of preeclampsia was 4.43 (95% CI: 3.73-5.20), with significant differences between ACOG (4.68%) and ISSHP (3.66%) criteria. For eclampsia, the prevalence was 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19%-0.76%), while the estimate for HELLP syndrome is 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16%-0.72%), which must be interpreted with considerable caution as it is derived from a limited pool of only nine studies. Marked regional disparities were identified, with higher prevalences in low-income countries. Meta-regression for preeclampsia revealed a non-significant increasing trend over time (p = 0.23) and a significant inverse correlation with sample size (p < 0.01). For eclampsia, neither the temporal trend (p = 0.68) nor the association with sample size (p = 0.65) was statistically significant.

Conclusions: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect 4.43% (95% CI: 3.73%-5.20%) of pregnancies globally for preeclampsia, 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19%-0.76%) for eclampsia, and 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16%-0.72%) for HELLP syndrome, with considerable variations according to regions and diagnostic criteria. The upward trend underscores the need to strengthen epidemiological surveillance systems and preventive programs, especially in high-prevalence areas.

妊娠期高血压疾病是全世界孕产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率的主要原因。然而,在不同的研究和地区,先兆子痫、子痫和HELLP综合征的患病率估计差异很大。目的:确定全球子痫前期、子痫和HELLP(溶血、肝酶升高和血小板计数低)综合征的患病率,分析其地理分布,并评估时间和方法学趋势。方法:采用meta分析进行系统综述。SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed和EMBASE数据库被检索到2025年5月。纳入了使用标准化诊断标准报告患病率数据的观察性研究。使用具有Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换的随机效应模型对患病率进行汇总。按诊断标准和国家进行亚组分析,按出版年份和样本量进行meta回归。结果:70项先兆子痫研究(2,465,570例),21项子痫研究(9,782,257例),9项HELLP综合征研究(133,611例)被分析。全球子痫前期患病率为4.43 (95% CI: 3.73-5.20), ACOG(4.68%)和ISSHP(3.66%)标准之间存在显著差异。子痫的患病率为0.43% (95% CI: 0.19%-0.76%),而HELLP综合征的患病率估计为0.39% (95% CI: 0.16%-0.72%),这必须非常谨慎地解释,因为它仅来自有限的9项研究。发现了明显的区域差异,低收入国家的患病率较高。子痫前期meta回归显示随时间的增加趋势不显著(p = 0.23),与样本量呈显著负相关(p = 0.68),与样本量相关(p = 0.65)无统计学意义。结论:妊娠高血压疾病在全球范围内影响子痫前期妊娠的比例为4.43% (95% CI: 3.73% ~ 5.20%),影响子痫妊娠的比例为0.43% (95% CI: 0.19% ~ 0.76%),影响HELLP综合征妊娠的比例为0.39% (95% CI: 0.16% ~ 0.72%),不同地区和诊断标准差异较大。这一上升趋势强调需要加强流行病学监测系统和预防规划,特别是在高流行地区。
{"title":"Global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, Joan A Loayza-Castro, Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval, Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya, Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1706009","DOIUrl":"10.3389/frph.2025.1706009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy represent a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, prevalence estimates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome vary considerably across studies and regions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelet count) syndrome, analyze their geographical distribution, and evaluate temporal and methodological trends.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched through May 2025. Observational studies reporting prevalence data using standardized diagnostic criteria were included. Prevalences were pooled using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analyses by diagnostic criteria and countries and meta-regressions by publication year and sample size were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy studies on preeclampsia (2,465,570 participants), 21 on eclampsia (9,782,257 participants), and nine on HELLP syndrome (133,611 participants) were analyzed. The global prevalence of preeclampsia was 4.43 (95% CI: 3.73-5.20), with significant differences between ACOG (4.68%) and ISSHP (3.66%) criteria. For eclampsia, the prevalence was 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19%-0.76%), while the estimate for HELLP syndrome is 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16%-0.72%), which must be interpreted with considerable caution as it is derived from a limited pool of only nine studies. Marked regional disparities were identified, with higher prevalences in low-income countries. Meta-regression for preeclampsia revealed a non-significant increasing trend over time (<i>p</i> = 0.23) and a significant inverse correlation with sample size (<i>p</i> < 0.01). For eclampsia, neither the temporal trend (<i>p</i> = 0.68) nor the association with sample size (<i>p</i> = 0.65) was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect 4.43% (95% CI: 3.73%-5.20%) of pregnancies globally for preeclampsia, 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19%-0.76%) for eclampsia, and 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16%-0.72%) for HELLP syndrome, with considerable variations according to regions and diagnostic criteria. The upward trend underscores the need to strengthen epidemiological surveillance systems and preventive programs, especially in high-prevalence areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1706009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12640961/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Frontiers in reproductive health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1