Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica最新文献

Background and study aims: Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) may complicate percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. In these patients, endoscopic treatment ought to be considered. Various approaches have been published, ranging from dissectionbased techniques to novel dedicated devices, although the evidence supporting the use of the Balloon Dilation Pull (BDP) technique has been limited to single case reports. The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the systematic use of the BDPtechnique for the endoscopic treatment of BBS.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients treated with the BDP-technique between January 2011 and November 2021.

Results: In total, 26 patients were identified (median age 72 (SD ± 13) years, 74% male, 84.6% underlying neurological disease). Technical success was achieved in 92.3%, with a median procedure time of 17.5 minutes (range 5-27). Adverse events were identified in 3.8% of patients (N=1, aspiration, ASGE lexicon severity grade: moderate).

Conclusions: Our experience suggests that the BDP-technique is highly efficacious and safe, using accessories readily available in every endoscopic unit. Given the limited procedure time and tools required, this procedure has the potential to further optimize patient care in the context of BBS.

Background: Achieving post-anesthesia discharge criteria after surgery or outpatient procedures does not mean that the patient has regained all his or her faculties, such as driving. Although mandated by many clinical guidelines, there is no evidence that escort-drivers reduce the risk of traffic accidents after deep sedation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate that hypothesis that driving performance as measured using a driving simulation would not differ between patients who had undergone deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy meeting discharge criteria and their escorts.

Methods: This prospective study included patients scheduled for ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep propofol sedation (patient group) and their escorts (escort group). Driving performance of escorts and patients (when discharge criteria were met) was assessed using a driving simulator.

Results: 30 patients and their escorts were included. Patients crossed the midline significantly more frequently than escorts (3 [2-4] (median [IQR]) and 2 [1-3] crossings, respectively, p=0.015]. Patients were speeding for a higher proportion of the distance traveled compared with escorts (37 (20)% (mean (SD)) and 24 (17)% in patients and escorts, respectively, p = 0.029). There were no significant differences between groups in other simulation parameters.

Conclusions: The ability to stay within the traffic lanes, as measured by the number of midline crossing during a simulated driving performance, is impaired in patients who meet discharge criteria after gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation compared with their escorts. This finding does not support a practice of allowing patients to drive themselves home after these procedures.

Background and study aims: Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic condition with upper abdominal symptoms in the absence of an organic cause. The first line treatment consists of protonpomp inhibition or Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, this approach often does not provide enough symptom relief. Neuromodulating agents are commonly used in clinical practice but only tricyclic antidepressant (TCAs) are mentioned in European and American and Canadian guidelines.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature in Pubmed for full-text randomized controlled trials in English with adult participants (>18 years) who met the Rome II, III or IV criteria or were diagnosed by a physician with a negative upper endoscopy and that compared a neuromodulating agent with placebo.

Results: The search strategy identified 386 articles of which 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. TCAs like amitriptyline and imipramine have been shown to be effective in the treatment of functional dyspepsia whereas other neuromodulating agents like tetracyclic antidepressants, levosulpiride and anxiolytics might be beneficial but conclusive evidence is lacking. serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) have not shown benefit in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Conclusion: Selected neuromodulators have an established efficacy in functional dyspepsia. The best supporting evidence is available for TCAs with a potential role for tetracyclic antidepressants, levosulpiride and anxiolytics.

Background and aims: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder characterized by abdominal pain and an altered bowel habit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of a population visiting a patient-centered informative website about IBS.

Methods: Five digital surveys were used to assess the Rome IV criteria, red flag symptoms, healthcare use, psychological comorbidities, quality of life, symptom severity, diet, physical activity. Patients were divided into a Rome positive and negative population with the Rome positive population being further subtyped based on dominant stool pattern.

Results: Red flag symptoms (42%) and comorbid psychological disorders (65% anxiety and 39% depression) were common. Despite consulting health care professionals and therapy, most patients (96%) still experienced moderate to severe symptoms with an average impact on quality of life. 73% performed regular physical exercise and 25% of the Rome positive population followed the FODMAP diet. Almost all participants consulted a health care professional at one point in time and used some form of therapy. 54% of the patients believed there is generally sufficient information available and 57% thinks that their physician takes IBS seriously. However, only 41% thinks that their physician has sufficient knowledge about IBS.

Conclusions: This study underlines the importance of a thorough characterization of IBS patients. Furthermore, patients expressed an urgent need for high quality information and education for both health care professionals and patients.

Background: The development of 'third-space'-endoscopy has paved the way towards en-bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has improved the endoscopic management of colorectal lesions by facilitating R0-resection, improving histological assessment and preventing recurrence.

Methods: The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based overview of indications for which ESD should be considered within colorectal endoscopy.

Results: The development of ESD has partially bridged the gap between endoscopy and surgery, but depends heavily on adequate pre-resection visual evaluation, ruling out potential deep submucosal invasion. ESD should be considered for large colorectal polyps (≥20mm) and/or lesions diagnosed as harbouring high-grade dysplasia, in-situ carcinoma or superficial submucosal invasion. Not only has it found its way into our guidelines for the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms, ESD also seems a promising alternative for the controlled resection of large pedunculated lesions. ESD can also be applied in more challenging situations, such as in pre-treated lesions, post-surgical context and in patients with IBD, although this requires a high level of skill and expertise.

Conclusions: In this review we have described the different indications for ESD and attempted to define its place within our current endoscopic armamentarium. For both non-expert and expert endoscopists, knowledge about ESD indications, patient selection and therapeutic alternatives, remains crucial in the care for patients with colorectal neoplasia.