首页 > 最新文献

International journal of clinical practice. Supplement最新文献

英文 中文
Research advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2型糖尿病治疗的研究进展。
J Caro, K L Wishner
{"title":"Research advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"J Caro, K L Wishner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes. 胰岛素治疗在2型糖尿病中的作用。
S Del Prato
{"title":"The role of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes.","authors":"S Del Prato","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimisation of insulin treatment to improve cardiovascular risk. 优化胰岛素治疗以提高心血管风险。
A De Leiva
{"title":"Optimisation of insulin treatment to improve cardiovascular risk.","authors":"A De Leiva","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State of current therapy and patient care in Europe. 欧洲目前的治疗和病人护理状况。
P J Lefebvre, A J Scheen
{"title":"State of current therapy and patient care in Europe.","authors":"P J Lefebvre, A J Scheen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The importance of postprandial hyperglycaemia. 餐后高血糖的重要性。
J R Gavin
{"title":"The importance of postprandial hyperglycaemia.","authors":"J R Gavin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient preference for oral sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM11 Study Group. 急性偏头痛患者口服舒马曲坦25mg、50mg或100mg的偏好:一项双盲、随机、交叉研究舒马曲坦片S2CM11研究组。
R Salonen, E A Ashford, M Gibbs, H Hassani

Background: Dosing recommendations for oral sumatriptan have ranged from 25 mg to 100 mg. Patient dose preferences are clinically relevant (perhaps moreso than traditional efficacy endpoints) and deserve study.

Methods: A multinational randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted over 18 weeks to assess patient dose preference, efficacy, and tolerability for oral sumatriptan (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine; 257 patients treated three attacks, using a different dose for each.

Results: The 100 mg dose was preferred by 35% of patients, 31% the 50 mg dose, and 25% the 25 mg dose. Efficacy and speed of action were the two main reasons given for preferring the higher doses. Compared with the 25 mg dose, the 100 mg and 50 mg doses were significantly more likely to provide headache relief at 2, 3, and 4 h after dosing and complete headache resolution at 3 and 4 h after dosing (P < 0.027). Recurrence rates were similar for the three doses, ranging from 33% to 38%, though the median time to recurrence increased with dose, from 8.5 to 11.8 h. The 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses were all well tolerated, with adverse event incidences of 19%, 21%, and 30%, respectively.

Conclusions: Patients preferred the 50 mg and 100 mg doses of oral sumatriptan to the 25 mg dose, and the higher doses were more effective against migraine; however, the 25 mg and 50 mg doses were better tolerated than the 100 mg dose. Though the 50 mg dose probably has the best effectiveness-to-tolerability ratio, some patients clearly prefer a higher dose.

背景:口服舒马曲坦的推荐剂量从25毫克到100毫克不等。患者的剂量偏好与临床相关(可能比传统的疗效终点更重要),值得研究。方法:进行了一项为期18周的多国随机双盲交叉研究,以评估口服舒马曲坦(25mg、50mg和100mg)急性治疗偏头痛的患者剂量偏好、疗效和耐受性;257名患者治疗了三次发作,每次使用不同的剂量。结果:35%的患者选择100mg剂量,31%的患者选择50mg剂量,25%的患者选择25mg剂量。功效和作用速度是选择高剂量的两个主要原因。与25 mg剂量相比,100 mg和50 mg剂量更有可能在给药后2、3和4小时缓解头痛,并在给药后3和4小时完全解决头痛(P < 0.027)。三种剂量的复发率相似,范围从33%到38%,尽管中位复发时间随剂量增加而增加,从8.5到11.8小时。25mg、50mg和100mg剂量均耐受良好,不良事件发生率分别为19%、21%和30%。结论:口服舒马普坦50mg和100mg比25mg更受患者青睐,且高剂量舒马普坦治疗偏头痛效果更好;然而,25毫克和50毫克的剂量比100毫克的剂量耐受性更好。虽然50mg剂量可能具有最佳的有效-耐受性比,但一些患者显然更喜欢更高的剂量。
{"title":"Patient preference for oral sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM11 Study Group.","authors":"R Salonen,&nbsp;E A Ashford,&nbsp;M Gibbs,&nbsp;H Hassani","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dosing recommendations for oral sumatriptan have ranged from 25 mg to 100 mg. Patient dose preferences are clinically relevant (perhaps moreso than traditional efficacy endpoints) and deserve study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multinational randomized double-blind crossover study was conducted over 18 weeks to assess patient dose preference, efficacy, and tolerability for oral sumatriptan (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine; 257 patients treated three attacks, using a different dose for each.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 100 mg dose was preferred by 35% of patients, 31% the 50 mg dose, and 25% the 25 mg dose. Efficacy and speed of action were the two main reasons given for preferring the higher doses. Compared with the 25 mg dose, the 100 mg and 50 mg doses were significantly more likely to provide headache relief at 2, 3, and 4 h after dosing and complete headache resolution at 3 and 4 h after dosing (P < 0.027). Recurrence rates were similar for the three doses, ranging from 33% to 38%, though the median time to recurrence increased with dose, from 8.5 to 11.8 h. The 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses were all well tolerated, with adverse event incidences of 19%, 21%, and 30%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients preferred the 50 mg and 100 mg doses of oral sumatriptan to the 25 mg dose, and the higher doses were more effective against migraine; however, the 25 mg and 50 mg doses were better tolerated than the 100 mg dose. Though the 50 mg dose probably has the best effectiveness-to-tolerability ratio, some patients clearly prefer a higher dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining optimal dosing for sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. 确定舒马曲坦片在偏头痛急性治疗中的最佳剂量。
N T Mathew, R Salonen

Oral sumatriptan, which is a well tolerated, effective acute treatment for migraine, and is selectively available in different countries in 100 mg, 50 mg, and 25 mg tablets. The first large dose-ranging study compared the 100 mg dose to higher doses (200 mg and 300 mg) and found it to be just as efficacious and better tolerated. The first studies comparing the 100 mg dose to lower doses (25 mg and 50 mg) found them all to be similar in effectiveness and tolerability. However, a larger definitive study found that the 100 mg and 50 mg doses offered better efficacy than the 25 mg dose, whereas the 25 mg and 50 mg doses were better tolerated than the 100 mg dose. Thus the 50 mg dose appears to offer the best ratio of efficacy to tolerability. Many patients, though, prefer or require the 100 mg dose and tolerate it well. Allowed to select dosing themselves, patients tend to migrate to the 100 mg dose.

口服舒马曲坦是一种耐受性良好的有效偏头痛急性治疗药物,在不同国家有选择性地提供100毫克、50毫克和25毫克片剂。第一个大剂量范围的研究将100毫克剂量与更高剂量(200毫克和300毫克)进行了比较,发现它同样有效,而且耐受性更好。第一批比较100毫克剂量和较低剂量(25毫克和50毫克)的研究发现,它们在有效性和耐受性方面都是相似的。然而,一项更大的决定性研究发现,100毫克和50毫克剂量比25毫克剂量的疗效更好,而25毫克和50毫克剂量比100毫克剂量的耐受性更好。因此,50毫克的剂量似乎提供了最佳的疗效与耐受性的比例。然而,许多患者更喜欢或需要100毫克的剂量,并能很好地耐受。允许患者自行选择剂量,患者倾向于迁移到100mg剂量。
{"title":"Defining optimal dosing for sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine.","authors":"N T Mathew,&nbsp;R Salonen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral sumatriptan, which is a well tolerated, effective acute treatment for migraine, and is selectively available in different countries in 100 mg, 50 mg, and 25 mg tablets. The first large dose-ranging study compared the 100 mg dose to higher doses (200 mg and 300 mg) and found it to be just as efficacious and better tolerated. The first studies comparing the 100 mg dose to lower doses (25 mg and 50 mg) found them all to be similar in effectiveness and tolerability. However, a larger definitive study found that the 100 mg and 50 mg doses offered better efficacy than the 25 mg dose, whereas the 25 mg and 50 mg doses were better tolerated than the 100 mg dose. Thus the 50 mg dose appears to offer the best ratio of efficacy to tolerability. Many patients, though, prefer or require the 100 mg dose and tolerate it well. Allowed to select dosing themselves, patients tend to migrate to the 100 mg dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A double-blind placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM07 Study Group. 一项双盲安慰剂对照研究评估50mg舒马普坦片急性治疗偏头痛的疗效和耐受性。舒马曲坦片S2CM07研究组。
N Savani, N J Brautaset, M Reunanen, I Szirmai, E A Ashford, H Hassani, J Saiers

Background: Oral sumatriptan 50 mg has been found to have good efficacy and tolerability in the acute treatment of migraine but has been less well studied than the 100 mg dose.

Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel-group study (Glaxo Wellcome protocol number S2CM07) comparing the efficacy and safety of sumatriptan 50 mg tablets with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Patients treated three migraine attacks with study medication; a second, optional dose was available for treating recurrent headache. Of the 560 patients randomized, 485 treated at least one attack, 411 at least two attacks, and 362 three attacks. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients who had obtained complete or almost complete headache relief at 4 h after dosing.

Results: For all attacks, a significantly greater proportion of patients experienced headache relief at 4 h with sumatriptan 50 mg tablets than with placebo (59% to 62% versus 32% to 42%; P = 0.005). The same was true at 3 h across all attacks, and at 2 h for attacks 1 and 2 (49% versus 23% and 45% versus 29%, respectively). Although sumatriptan and placebo were associated with similar incidences of recurrence, sumatriptan was associated with a longer time to recurrence. The incidence of adverse events with sumatriptan was similar to that with placebo, and there was no increase in adverse events associated with use of a second dose to treat recurrence.

Conclusions: Sumatriptan 50 mg tablets are well tolerated and efficacious in relieving migraine headache.

背景:口服舒马曲坦50mg在急性偏头痛治疗中具有良好的疗效和耐受性,但与100mg剂量相比,研究较少。方法:这是一项双盲、平行组研究(葛兰素威康协议号S2CM07),比较舒马曲坦50mg片与安慰剂在急性偏头痛治疗中的疗效和安全性。患者用研究药物治疗三次偏头痛发作;第二种可选剂量可用于治疗复发性头痛。在随机分配的560例患者中,485例至少治疗一次发作,411例至少治疗两次发作,362例治疗三次发作。主要疗效指标是在给药后4小时获得完全或几乎完全头痛缓解的患者比例。结果:对于所有发作,服用舒马普坦50mg片剂后4小时头痛缓解的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组(59% - 62% vs 32% - 42%;P = 0.005)。所有攻击在3小时时也是如此,攻击1和2小时时也是如此(分别为49%对23%,45%对29%)。虽然舒马曲坦与安慰剂的复发率相似,但舒马曲坦的复发期较长。使用舒马曲坦的不良事件发生率与安慰剂相似,并且使用第二剂量治疗复发的不良事件发生率没有增加。结论:舒马曲坦50mg片具有良好的耐受性和治疗偏头痛的疗效。
{"title":"A double-blind placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM07 Study Group.","authors":"N Savani,&nbsp;N J Brautaset,&nbsp;M Reunanen,&nbsp;I Szirmai,&nbsp;E A Ashford,&nbsp;H Hassani,&nbsp;J Saiers","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral sumatriptan 50 mg has been found to have good efficacy and tolerability in the acute treatment of migraine but has been less well studied than the 100 mg dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blind, parallel-group study (Glaxo Wellcome protocol number S2CM07) comparing the efficacy and safety of sumatriptan 50 mg tablets with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Patients treated three migraine attacks with study medication; a second, optional dose was available for treating recurrent headache. Of the 560 patients randomized, 485 treated at least one attack, 411 at least two attacks, and 362 three attacks. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients who had obtained complete or almost complete headache relief at 4 h after dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all attacks, a significantly greater proportion of patients experienced headache relief at 4 h with sumatriptan 50 mg tablets than with placebo (59% to 62% versus 32% to 42%; P = 0.005). The same was true at 3 h across all attacks, and at 2 h for attacks 1 and 2 (49% versus 23% and 45% versus 29%, respectively). Although sumatriptan and placebo were associated with similar incidences of recurrence, sumatriptan was associated with a longer time to recurrence. The incidence of adverse events with sumatriptan was similar to that with placebo, and there was no increase in adverse events associated with use of a second dose to treat recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sumatriptan 50 mg tablets are well tolerated and efficacious in relieving migraine headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-selected dosing in a six-month open-label study evaluating oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM10 Study Group. 为期六个月的开放标签研究中评估口服舒马曲坦急性治疗偏头痛的患者选择剂量。舒马曲坦片S2CM10研究组。
A J Dowson, E A Ashford, S Prendergast, H Hassani, G W Roberts, T Flöter, A Szczudlik

Background: Dosing recommendations for oral sumatriptan as acute treatment for migraine have ranged from 25 mg to 100 mg. Patient dose preferences have not been studied in a setting mimicking clinical practice.

Methods: In an open-label study evaluating patient acceptance and the relative efficacy and safety of 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses of oral sumatriptan over a period of six months, 338 patients treated three migraine attacks with 50 mg sumatriptan and then were allowed to double or halve the dose. After treating another three attacks, they were again allowed to adjust the dose by one level.

Results: After migraine attack 3, 37% of patients chose to continue with the 50 mg dose, 50% increased the dose to 100 mg, and 12% decreased it to 25 mg. After attack 6, 8%, 33%, and 58% of patients chose the 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses, respectively; only 3% of those taking the 100 mg dose chose to reduce it. Overall, the mean percentages of attacks per patient in which headache relief had been obtained 4 h after dosing were 71%, 71%, and 80% for the 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses, respectively. Patients who decreased the dose to 25 mg after attack 3 experienced decreases both in adverse events and percentage of attacks with headache relief, whereas in those who increased the dose to 100 mg, likelihood of headache relief increased but the incidence of adverse events did not.

Conclusions: More patients chose the 50 mg or 100 mg dose than the 25 mg dose. All three doses had similar efficacy and tolerability.

背景:口服舒马曲坦作为偏头痛急性治疗的推荐剂量从25mg到100mg不等。患者的剂量偏好尚未在模拟临床实践的环境中进行研究。方法:在一项开放标签研究中,评估患者接受25mg、50mg和100mg口服舒马普坦6个月的相对疗效和安全性,338例患者用50mg舒马普坦治疗3次偏头痛发作,然后允许剂量加倍或减半。在治疗了另外三次发作后,他们再次被允许将剂量调整一个水平。结果:偏头痛发作3次后,37%的患者选择继续50mg剂量,50%的患者选择增加剂量至100mg, 12%的患者选择减少剂量至25mg。发作后,分别有6,8%,33%和58%的患者选择25mg, 50mg和100mg的剂量;服用100毫克剂量的人中,只有3%的人选择减少剂量。总的来说,每名患者在给药4小时后头痛缓解的平均发作百分比分别为71%,71%和80%,分别为25mg, 50mg和100mg剂量。在第3次发作后将剂量减少到25毫克的患者,其不良事件和头痛缓解发作的百分比都有所减少,而将剂量增加到100毫克的患者,头痛缓解的可能性增加了,但不良事件的发生率没有增加。结论:选择50mg或100mg剂量的患者多于25mg剂量的患者。三种剂量的疗效和耐受性相似。
{"title":"Patient-selected dosing in a six-month open-label study evaluating oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM10 Study Group.","authors":"A J Dowson,&nbsp;E A Ashford,&nbsp;S Prendergast,&nbsp;H Hassani,&nbsp;G W Roberts,&nbsp;T Flöter,&nbsp;A Szczudlik","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dosing recommendations for oral sumatriptan as acute treatment for migraine have ranged from 25 mg to 100 mg. Patient dose preferences have not been studied in a setting mimicking clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an open-label study evaluating patient acceptance and the relative efficacy and safety of 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses of oral sumatriptan over a period of six months, 338 patients treated three migraine attacks with 50 mg sumatriptan and then were allowed to double or halve the dose. After treating another three attacks, they were again allowed to adjust the dose by one level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After migraine attack 3, 37% of patients chose to continue with the 50 mg dose, 50% increased the dose to 100 mg, and 12% decreased it to 25 mg. After attack 6, 8%, 33%, and 58% of patients chose the 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses, respectively; only 3% of those taking the 100 mg dose chose to reduce it. Overall, the mean percentages of attacks per patient in which headache relief had been obtained 4 h after dosing were 71%, 71%, and 80% for the 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses, respectively. Patients who decreased the dose to 25 mg after attack 3 experienced decreases both in adverse events and percentage of attacks with headache relief, whereas in those who increased the dose to 100 mg, likelihood of headache relief increased but the incidence of adverse events did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More patients chose the 50 mg or 100 mg dose than the 25 mg dose. All three doses had similar efficacy and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21545531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postprandial hyperglycaemia--its importance and implications. 餐后高血糖——它的重要性和意义。
H J Lüddeke
{"title":"Postprandial hyperglycaemia--its importance and implications.","authors":"H J Lüddeke","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22318698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International journal of clinical practice. Supplement
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1