首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Appalachian health最新文献

英文 中文
Understanding Polarizing Community Perspectives on Harm Reduction Strategies: Challenges to Addressing the Opioid Crisis in Appalachian Pennsylvania. 了解社区对减低伤害策略的两极化观点:宾夕法尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区应对阿片类药物危机的挑战。
Pub Date : 2021-10-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0304.07
Stephanie L Creasy, Jessica R Thompson, Christina F Mair, Jessica G Burke

Introduction: Rural communities face barriers to opioid treatment and overdose prevention including concerns about stigma and lack of harm reduction services.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore community perspectives and understanding of harm reduction approaches to opioid use and overdose in a high-risk Northern Appalachian case community in Pennsylvania.

Methods: A small town approximately 10 miles from Pittsburgh was identified as the community with the greatest predicted probabilities of epidemic outbreak using posteriors from spatial models of hospitalizations for opioid use disorders. We interviewed 20 key stakeholders in the case community in using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed the qualitative data using an inductive grounded theory approach.

Results: Our findings illustrate how conflicting perspectives about opioid dependence lay the foundation for the polarizing community perspectives on addressing opioid use and overdose and general disagreement regarding the legitimacy of harm reduction approaches versus abstinence-based recovery plans. Community members shared varying perspectives on multiple aspects of the opioid epidemic, including appropriate strategies, treatment, and overdose prevention methods and how community leaders and organizations should respond.

Implications: Opinions, coupled with a general lack of education regarding opioid use and harm reduction options, make it challenging for small communities with limited resources to create comprehensive plans to address the opioid crisis.

导言:目的:本研究旨在探讨宾夕法尼亚州一个高风险北阿巴拉契亚病例社区对减少阿片类药物使用和用药过量方法的看法和理解:利用阿片类药物使用障碍住院治疗的空间模型的后验结果,我们将一个距离匹兹堡约 10 英里的小镇确定为流行病爆发概率最大的社区。我们使用半结构化访谈指南对案例社区的 20 名主要利益相关者进行了访谈,并使用归纳式基础理论方法对定性数据进行了分析:我们的研究结果表明,关于阿片类药物依赖性的观点冲突如何为解决阿片类药物使用和用药过量问题的社区观点两极分化奠定了基础,以及在减少伤害方法与基于禁欲的康复计划的合法性问题上的普遍分歧。社区成员对阿片类药物流行的多个方面持有不同观点,包括适当的策略、治疗和过量预防方法,以及社区领袖和组织应如何应对:各种观点,再加上普遍缺乏有关阿片类药物使用和减少伤害选择的教育,使得资源有限的小型社区在制定应对阿片类药物危机的综合计划时面临挑战。
{"title":"Understanding Polarizing Community Perspectives on Harm Reduction Strategies: Challenges to Addressing the Opioid Crisis in Appalachian Pennsylvania.","authors":"Stephanie L Creasy, Jessica R Thompson, Christina F Mair, Jessica G Burke","doi":"10.13023/jah.0304.07","DOIUrl":"10.13023/jah.0304.07","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural communities face barriers to opioid treatment and overdose prevention including concerns about stigma and lack of harm reduction services.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore community perspectives and understanding of harm reduction approaches to opioid use and overdose in a high-risk Northern Appalachian case community in Pennsylvania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A small town approximately 10 miles from Pittsburgh was identified as the community with the greatest predicted probabilities of epidemic outbreak using posteriors from spatial models of hospitalizations for opioid use disorders. We interviewed 20 key stakeholders in the case community in using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed the qualitative data using an inductive grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings illustrate how conflicting perspectives about opioid dependence lay the foundation for the polarizing community perspectives on addressing opioid use and overdose and general disagreement regarding the legitimacy of harm reduction approaches versus abstinence-based recovery plans. Community members shared varying perspectives on multiple aspects of the opioid epidemic, including appropriate strategies, treatment, and overdose prevention methods and how community leaders and organizations should respond.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Opinions, coupled with a general lack of education regarding opioid use and harm reduction options, make it challenging for small communities with limited resources to create comprehensive plans to address the opioid crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"3 4","pages":"74-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183794/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40409990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Compounding Effect of Rurality on Health Disparities Among Black Patients with COVID-19. 农村因素对黑人COVID-19患者健康差异的复合效应
Pub Date : 2021-10-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0304.03
Jessica E Johnson, Ruchi Bhandari, Allison Lastinger, Rebecca Reece

Background: West Virginia had garnered national attention for its vaccination rollout against coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Outcomes of this mostly rural population, however, have been underreported. As the pandemic continues, identifying high risk populations remains important to further epidemiologic information and target vaccines.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to examine the effects of COVID-19 and the influence of race and rurality on hospitalization and outcomes in Appalachians.

Methods: In this retrospective study, data from patients who tested positive and were admitted for COVID-19 and seen within the state's largest health system (West Virginia University Health System) between March 18 and September 16, 2020 were analyzed. Cases were stratified into rural or urban based on rural urban continuum codes (RUCCs) and by race into 'white,' 'black,' or 'other.' Associations between rurality, rurality and race, and outcomes were assessed.

Results: A total of 2011 adult West Virginians tested positive, of which 8.2% were hospitalized. Of the hospitalized patients, 33.5% were rural and 11.6% were black. Rural black patients were three times more likely (OR: 3.33; 95%CI:1.46-7.60) to be admitted. Rural blacks were also more likely to have a history of obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.73; 1.24-6.01), hypertension (OR: 2.78; 1.38-5.57), and multiple chronic conditions (3.04; 1.48-6.22).

Implications: Rural blacks were more likely to have risk factors for severe COVID-19 influencing their increased risk of hospitalization. These findings support that race as a risk factor for severe COVID-19 is compounded by rurality and identifies an important target group for vaccination.

背景:西弗吉尼亚州因推出2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫苗接种而引起全国关注。然而,这些主要是农村人口的结果被低估了。随着大流行的继续,确定高风险人群对于进一步获得流行病学信息和目标疫苗仍然很重要。目的:本研究的目的是研究COVID-19的影响以及种族和农村对阿巴拉契亚地区住院和结局的影响。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2020年3月18日至9月16日期间在该州最大的卫生系统(西弗吉尼亚大学卫生系统)内检测呈阳性并入院的COVID-19患者的数据。根据城乡连续代码(RUCCs)将病例分为农村或城市,并按种族分为“白人”、“黑人”或“其他”。评估了乡村性、乡村性和种族之间的关系以及结果。结果:共有2011名西弗吉尼亚州成年人检测呈阳性,其中8.2%住院治疗。在住院患者中,33.5%是农村人,11.6%是黑人。农村黑人患者的可能性是农村黑人患者的三倍(OR: 3.33;95%CI:1.46-7.60)入院。农村黑人也更有可能有阻塞性肺病史(OR: 2.73;1.24-6.01),高血压(OR: 2.78;1.38-5.57),以及多种慢性疾病(3.04;1.48 - -6.22)。含义:农村黑人更有可能有严重COVID-19的危险因素,影响他们住院的风险增加。这些研究结果支持,种族作为严重COVID-19的风险因素与乡村性相结合,并确定了接种疫苗的重要目标群体。
{"title":"The Compounding Effect of Rurality on Health Disparities Among Black Patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Jessica E Johnson,&nbsp;Ruchi Bhandari,&nbsp;Allison Lastinger,&nbsp;Rebecca Reece","doi":"10.13023/jah.0304.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>West Virginia had garnered national attention for its vaccination rollout against coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Outcomes of this mostly rural population, however, have been underreported. As the pandemic continues, identifying high risk populations remains important to further epidemiologic information and target vaccines.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine the effects of COVID-19 and the influence of race and rurality on hospitalization and outcomes in Appalachians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from patients who tested positive and were admitted for COVID-19 and seen within the state's largest health system (West Virginia University Health System) between March 18 and September 16, 2020 were analyzed. Cases were stratified into rural or urban based on rural urban continuum codes (RUCCs) and by race into 'white,' 'black,' or 'other.' Associations between rurality, rurality and race, and outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2011 adult West Virginians tested positive, of which 8.2% were hospitalized. Of the hospitalized patients, 33.5% were rural and 11.6% were black. Rural black patients were three times more likely (OR: 3.33; 95%CI:1.46-7.60) to be admitted. Rural blacks were also more likely to have a history of obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.73; 1.24-6.01), hypertension (OR: 2.78; 1.38-5.57), and multiple chronic conditions (3.04; 1.48-6.22).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Rural blacks were more likely to have risk factors for severe COVID-19 influencing their increased risk of hospitalization. These findings support that race as a risk factor for severe COVID-19 is compounded by rurality and identifies an important target group for vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"3 4","pages":"11-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40409993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
COVID-19 Experiences, Behaviors, Beliefs, and Well-Being Among Students and Employees at a University In Rural Appalachia: A Cross-Sectional Study. 阿巴拉契亚农村一所大学学生和员工的COVID-19经历、行为、信仰和幸福感:一项横断面研究
Pub Date : 2021-10-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0304.09
Lauren Wisnieski, Kimberly A Carney, Jenny L Thornley
ABSTRACT:Introduction: In response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, most universities experienced drastic operational changes with shifts to online learning, work-from-home policies, and social distancing measures. These changes have caused concern for social isolation and mental health.Purpose: This cross-sectional study explores differences in COVID-19 experiences, behaviors, beliefs, and well-being among students and employees (faculty and staff) at a rural Appalachian university.Methods: Data were collected with an online anonymous survey in September–October 2020 using convenience sampling. The survey measured multiple domains including COVID-19-related (1) beliefs, (2) symptoms and diagnoses, (3) exposure and preventive behavior, and (4) social, mental, and financial health. Chi-square tests and linear regression models were used to determine differences in survey responses between students and employees.Results: The final sample used for analysis included 416 respondents. The majority of respondents believed COVID-19 was a serious disease and followed mask and social distancing guidelines, although employees were more likely to adhere to mask and social distancing guidelines compared to students. Most of the respondents (>50%) reported feeling more stressed, anxious, and sad since the pandemic began. Students were more impacted by the pandemic compared to employees as measured by the mental, social, and financial impact scale. A limitation of this study was that convenience sampling was used instead of a probability sampling technique, which limits the inference that can be made from the results.Implications: There may be a need for greater mental health support among university employees and students. However, future studies should confirm these findings.
导语:为应对新冠肺炎疫情,大多数高校经历了巨大的运营变革,转向在线学习、在家工作政策和社交距离措施。这些变化引起了人们对社会孤立和心理健康的关注。目的:本横断面研究探讨了阿巴拉契亚一所农村大学的学生和员工(教职员工)在COVID-19经历、行为、信仰和幸福感方面的差异。方法:采用方便抽样法,于2020年9 - 10月进行网上匿名调查。该调查测量了多个领域,包括与covid -19相关的(1)信念,(2)症状和诊断,(3)暴露和预防行为,以及(4)社会、心理和财务健康。使用卡方检验和线性回归模型来确定学生和员工之间调查回答的差异。结果:最终用于分析的样本包括416名受访者。大多数受访者认为COVID-19是一种严重的疾病,并遵循口罩和保持社交距离的指导方针,尽管与学生相比,员工更有可能遵守口罩和保持社交距离的指导方针。大多数答复者(>50%)报告说,自大流行开始以来,他们感到更大的压力、焦虑和悲伤。从心理、社会和财务影响量表来看,与员工相比,学生受疫情的影响更大。本研究的一个局限性是使用了方便抽样而不是概率抽样技术,这限制了可以从结果中做出的推断。启示:大学员工和学生可能需要更多的心理健康支持。然而,未来的研究应该会证实这些发现。
{"title":"COVID-19 Experiences, Behaviors, Beliefs, and Well-Being Among Students and Employees at a University In Rural Appalachia: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Lauren Wisnieski,&nbsp;Kimberly A Carney,&nbsp;Jenny L Thornley","doi":"10.13023/jah.0304.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.09","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Introduction: In response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, most universities experienced drastic operational changes with shifts to online learning, work-from-home policies, and social distancing measures. These changes have caused concern for social isolation and mental health.Purpose: This cross-sectional study explores differences in COVID-19 experiences, behaviors, beliefs, and well-being among students and employees (faculty and staff) at a rural Appalachian university.Methods: Data were collected with an online anonymous survey in September–October 2020 using convenience sampling. The survey measured multiple domains including COVID-19-related (1) beliefs, (2) symptoms and diagnoses, (3) exposure and preventive behavior, and (4) social, mental, and financial health. Chi-square tests and linear regression models were used to determine differences in survey responses between students and employees.Results: The final sample used for analysis included 416 respondents. The majority of respondents believed COVID-19 was a serious disease and followed mask and social distancing guidelines, although employees were more likely to adhere to mask and social distancing guidelines compared to students. Most of the respondents (>50%) reported feeling more stressed, anxious, and sad since the pandemic began. Students were more impacted by the pandemic compared to employees as measured by the mental, social, and financial impact scale. A limitation of this study was that convenience sampling was used instead of a probability sampling technique, which limits the inference that can be made from the results.Implications: There may be a need for greater mental health support among university employees and students. However, future studies should confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"3 4","pages":"109-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40409992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of: Understanding and Dismantling Racism: Crowdsourcing a Pathway Model in Appalachia 《理解和拆除种族主义:阿巴拉契亚地区的众包路径模式》综述
Pub Date : 2021-08-07 DOI: 10.13023/JAH.0303.11
M. Hudson
ABSTRACT:The Journal of Appalachian Health is committed to reviewing published media that relates to contemporary concepts affecting the health of Appalachia. Examining Institutional Racism's impact on health, career advancement and outcomes in Appalachian communities, impacts our ability to address and identify solutions to inform the fundamental framing of health equity. Dr. Matthew F. Hudson critiques the website: Understanding and Dismantling Racism: Crowdsourcing a Pathway Model in Appalachia.
摘要:《阿巴拉契亚健康杂志》致力于综述与影响阿巴拉契亚人健康的当代概念相关的已发表媒体。研究制度性种族主义对阿巴拉契亚社区健康、职业发展和结果的影响,影响我们解决和确定解决方案的能力,为健康公平的基本框架提供信息。Matthew F.Hudson博士评论了该网站:《理解和消除种族主义:阿巴拉契亚的众包路径模式》。
{"title":"Review of: Understanding and Dismantling Racism: Crowdsourcing a Pathway Model in Appalachia","authors":"M. Hudson","doi":"10.13023/JAH.0303.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/JAH.0303.11","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The Journal of Appalachian Health is committed to reviewing published media that relates to contemporary concepts affecting the health of Appalachia. Examining Institutional Racism's impact on health, career advancement and outcomes in Appalachian communities, impacts our ability to address and identify solutions to inform the fundamental framing of health equity. Dr. Matthew F. Hudson critiques the website: Understanding and Dismantling Racism: Crowdsourcing a Pathway Model in Appalachia.","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"3 1","pages":"124 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43830818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diabetes Knowledge, Behaviors, and Perceptions of Risk in Rural West Virginia Counties. 西弗吉尼亚州农村地区的糖尿病知识、行为和风险认知。
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.05
Ranjita Misra, Sara Farjo, Renee McGinnis, Megan Adelman Elavsky, Summer Kuhn, Catherine Morton-McSwain

Introduction: A little less than half of American adults have diabetes or pre-diabetes. In 2016, West Virginia (WV) had the highest percentage (15.2%) of adults with diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.

Purpose: In partnership with the Health Sciences and Technology Academy (HSTA), a cross-sectional study was preformed to assess knowledge, behaviors, and perceptions of diabetes risk.

Methods: Data was collected by trained HSTA students and teachers who lived in rural counties in WV. Information was assessed using validated surveys, and HbA1c was obtained by utilizing professional point-of-care (Bayer) kits.

Results: Mean age and Body Mass Index (BMI) was 36.11±17.86 years and 27.80±6.09 kg/m2, respectively. More than half of the participants had a family history of diabetes (58.8%) and hypertension (60.2%), and a majority had elevated BMI (65.9%). However, only 29.2% rated their future risk for diabetes as moderate to high. Eighty percent (80%) had an inadequate amount of weekly exercise, and 36% had lower quality of diet. Overall, dietary quality and diabetes knowledge was associated with a low to moderate diabetes risk score; risk score positively correlated with higher HbA1c (r=0.439, P<.001). Participants' HbA1c, perceived future risk of diabetes and family history of diabetes emerged as significant predictors of diabetes risk in the regression model, controlling for health behavior and diabetes knowledge.

Implications: HbA1c, perceived future risk of diabetes and family history of diabetes may be the best predictors of developing diabetes in the future and, therefore, are important to assess during community screening. Perception of diabetes risk is lower than actual diabetes risk in WV.

导言:不到一半的美国成年人患有糖尿病或糖尿病前期。2016年,美国西弗吉尼亚州(WV)确诊糖尿病的成年人比例最高(15.2%)。目的:与健康科学与技术学院(HSTA)合作,开展了一项横断面研究,以评估糖尿病风险的知识、行为和看法:数据由经过培训的 HSTA 学生和居住在西弗吉尼亚州农村县城的教师收集。使用有效的调查问卷评估信息,并使用专业的护理点(拜耳)试剂盒检测 HbA1c:平均年龄和体重指数(BMI)分别为 36.11±17.86 岁和 27.80±6.09 kg/m2。一半以上的参与者有糖尿病家族史(58.8%)和高血压家族史(60.2%),大多数人的体重指数(BMI)升高(65.9%)。然而,只有 29.2% 的人将其未来患糖尿病的风险评为中度至高度。80%的人每周运动量不足,36%的人饮食质量较低。总体而言,饮食质量和糖尿病知识与中低糖尿病风险评分相关;风险评分与较高的 HbA1c 呈正相关(r=0.439,PImplications:HbA1c、未来糖尿病风险感知和糖尿病家族史可能是未来患糖尿病的最佳预测因素,因此在社区筛查中进行评估非常重要。在西弗吉尼亚州,对糖尿病风险的认知低于实际的糖尿病风险。
{"title":"Diabetes Knowledge, Behaviors, and Perceptions of Risk in Rural West Virginia Counties.","authors":"Ranjita Misra, Sara Farjo, Renee McGinnis, Megan Adelman Elavsky, Summer Kuhn, Catherine Morton-McSwain","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.05","DOIUrl":"10.13023/jah.0303.05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A little less than half of American adults have diabetes or pre-diabetes. In 2016, West Virginia (WV) had the highest percentage (15.2%) of adults with diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In partnership with the Health Sciences and Technology Academy (HSTA), a cross-sectional study was preformed to assess knowledge, behaviors, and perceptions of diabetes risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected by trained HSTA students and teachers who lived in rural counties in WV. Information was assessed using validated surveys, and HbA1c was obtained by utilizing professional point-of-care (Bayer) kits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age and Body Mass Index (BMI) was 36.11±17.86 years and 27.80±6.09 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. More than half of the participants had a family history of diabetes (58.8%) and hypertension (60.2%), and a majority had elevated BMI (65.9%). However, only 29.2% rated their future risk for diabetes as moderate to high. Eighty percent (80%) had an inadequate amount of weekly exercise, and 36% had lower quality of diet. Overall, dietary quality and diabetes knowledge was associated with a low to moderate diabetes risk score; risk score positively correlated with higher HbA1c (r=0.439, P<.001). Participants' HbA1c, perceived future risk of diabetes and family history of diabetes emerged as significant predictors of diabetes risk in the regression model, controlling for health behavior and diabetes knowledge.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>HbA1c, perceived future risk of diabetes and family history of diabetes may be the best predictors of developing diabetes in the future and, therefore, are important to assess during community screening. Perception of diabetes risk is lower than actual diabetes risk in WV.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"51-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192115/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural Re-entry and Opioid Use: Identifying Health-Related Predictors of Relapse Among Formerly Incarcerated Women in Appalachia. 农村重归社会与阿片类药物的使用:确定阿巴拉契亚地区曾被监禁妇女中与健康相关的复发预测因素》(Rural Re-entry and Opioid Use: Identifying Health-Related Predictors of Relapse Among Formerly Incarcerated Women in Appalachia.
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.03
Joseph M Calvert, Megan F Dickson, Martha Tillson, Erika Pike, Michele Staton

Introduction: Despite improved knowledge of the health care needs of formerly incarcerated women, there exists a gap regarding the relationship between health, health care access, and relapse among rural women returning to the community during the opioid epidemic.

Purpose: With an emphasis on health care access, this study examined health-related factors associated with opioid relapse among women reentering the community in rural Appalachia.

Methods: As part of a larger study, 400 rural women reporting a history of substance use were recruited from three Appalachian jails in Kentucky. Analyses focused on participants reporting a history of illicit opioid use prior to incarceration, who had also completed follow-up interviews at 6- and 12-months post-release from jail.

Results: Fifty-five percent of participants reported relapse to opioids during the 12-month follow-up period. Compared to those who did not use opioids during this time, women who relapsed reported poorer mental and physical health, as well as encountered more barriers to needed health services. They were also more likely to report a usual source of care. Multivariate regression analyses reveal that, even when controlling for other known correlates of opioid use and relapse to any non-opioid drug during the follow-up period, the number of barriers to health service utilization was a significant predictor of opioid relapse.

Implications: Stakeholders should address the complex reentry needs of women who use opioids in rural Appalachia. This includes examining innovative approaches to reduce extensive barriers to quality health care utilization, such as implementing telehealth for opioid use treatment.

简介:尽管人们对曾被监禁女性的医疗保健需求有了更多了解,但在阿片类药物流行期间,农村重返社区的女性在健康、医疗保健获取和复吸之间的关系方面仍存在差距。目的:本研究以医疗保健获取为重点,探讨了与阿巴拉契亚农村重返社区的女性复吸阿片类药物有关的健康相关因素:作为一项大型研究的一部分,我们从肯塔基州的三所阿巴拉契亚监狱招募了 400 名报告有药物使用史的农村妇女。分析的重点是报告入狱前有非法阿片类药物使用史的参与者,她们还完成了出狱后 6 个月和 12 个月的跟踪采访:55%的参与者报告在12个月的跟踪调查期间再次使用阿片类药物。与在此期间未使用阿片类药物的妇女相比,复吸妇女的身心健康状况更差,在获得所需医疗服务方面遇到的障碍也更多。她们也更有可能报告说没有通常的护理来源。多变量回归分析表明,即使控制了阿片类药物使用的其他已知相关因素以及在随访期间复吸任何非阿片类药物,医疗服务利用障碍的数量仍是阿片类药物复吸的重要预测因素:利益相关者应解决阿巴拉契亚农村地区使用阿片类药物的妇女复杂的重返社会需求。这包括研究创新方法,以减少优质医疗服务利用的广泛障碍,例如实施远程医疗以治疗阿片类药物的使用。
{"title":"Rural Re-entry and Opioid Use: Identifying Health-Related Predictors of Relapse Among Formerly Incarcerated Women in Appalachia.","authors":"Joseph M Calvert, Megan F Dickson, Martha Tillson, Erika Pike, Michele Staton","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.03","DOIUrl":"10.13023/jah.0303.03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite improved knowledge of the health care needs of formerly incarcerated women, there exists a gap regarding the relationship between health, health care access, and relapse among rural women returning to the community during the opioid epidemic.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With an emphasis on health care access, this study examined health-related factors associated with opioid relapse among women reentering the community in rural Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger study, 400 rural women reporting a history of substance use were recruited from three Appalachian jails in Kentucky. Analyses focused on participants reporting a history of illicit opioid use prior to incarceration, who had also completed follow-up interviews at 6- and 12-months post-release from jail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five percent of participants reported relapse to opioids during the 12-month follow-up period. Compared to those who did not use opioids during this time, women who relapsed reported poorer mental and physical health, as well as encountered more barriers to needed health services. They were also more likely to report a usual source of care. Multivariate regression analyses reveal that, even when controlling for other known correlates of opioid use and relapse to any non-opioid drug during the follow-up period, the number of barriers to health service utilization was a significant predictor of opioid relapse.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Stakeholders should address the complex reentry needs of women who use opioids in rural Appalachia. This includes examining innovative approaches to reduce extensive barriers to quality health care utilization, such as implementing telehealth for opioid use treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"22-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192118/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of: Appalachians for Medicaid Website. 回顾:阿巴拉契亚医疗补助网站。
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.10
Kendra Barker

The Journal of Appalachian Health is committed to reviewing published media that relates to contemporary concepts affecting the health of Appalachia. Access to care and the health disparities we face have a direct effect on our experience of illness. Dr. Kendra Barker reviews the website: Appalachians for Medicaid.

《阿巴拉契亚健康杂志》致力于审查与影响阿巴拉契亚健康的当代概念有关的出版媒体。获得护理的机会和我们面临的健康差距直接影响到我们的疾病经历。肯德拉·巴克博士评论了该网站:阿巴拉契亚人的医疗补助计划。
{"title":"Review of: Appalachians for Medicaid Website.","authors":"Kendra Barker","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0303.10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Journal of Appalachian Health</i> is committed to reviewing published media that relates to contemporary concepts affecting the health of Appalachia. Access to care and the health disparities we face have a direct effect on our experience of illness. Dr. Kendra Barker reviews the website: <i>Appalachians for Medicaid</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192113/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing Diabetes Distress in Self-Management Programs: Results of a Randomized Feasibility Study. 在自我管理计划中解决糖尿病困扰:一项随机可行性研究的结果。
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.06
Ranjita Misra, Samantha Shawley-Brzoska, Raihan Khan, Brenna O Kirk, Sijin Wen, Usha Sambamoorthi

Background: West Virginia ranks 1st nationally in the prevalence of hypertension (HTN; 43.8%) and diabetes (16.2%). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are distressed over physical and psychological burden of disease self-management.

Methods: This study investigated the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce diabetes distress and outcomes [glycemic control, blood pressure (BP)] among T2DM adults with comorbid HTN. Participants were randomized to a 12-week diabetes and hypertension self-management program versus a 3-month wait-listed control group. Trained health coaches and experts implemented the lifestyle program in a faith-based setting using an adapted evidence-based curriculum. Twenty adults with T2DM and HTN (n=10 per group) completed baseline and 12-week assessments. Diabetes distress was measured by using a validated Diabetes Distress Survey (17-item Likert scale; four sub-scales of emotional burden, physician related burden, regimen related burden, and interpersonal distress). Baseline and post-intervention changes in diabetes distress were compared for both groups; reduction in distress in the intervention groups are depicted using waterfall plots. The mean age, HbA1c and BMI were 55 ± 9.6 years, 7.8 ± 2.24 and 36.4 ± 8.8, respectively. Diabetes distress (total; mean) was 1.84±0.71.

Results: Participants reported higher diabetes distress related to emotional burden (2.1±0.94) and regimen-related distress (2.0 ± 0.74); physician-related distress was the lowest (1.18±0.64). In general, diabetes distress reduced among intervention participants and was especially significant among those with HbA1c ≤ 8% (r=0.28, p=0.4), and systolic/diastolic BP ≤140/80 mm Hg (r=0.045, P=0.18).

Implications: Findings suggest that lifestyle self-management programs have the potential to reduce diabetes distress.

背景:西弗吉尼亚州高血压患病率(HTN;43.8%)和糖尿病(16.2%)。2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者承受着疾病自我管理带来的生理和心理负担。方法:本研究调查了一项干预措施在T2DM合并HTN的成人患者中降低糖尿病窘迫和预后[血糖控制、血压(BP)]的有效性。参与者被随机分配到为期12周的糖尿病和高血压自我管理计划中,而对照组则是3个月的等待名单。训练有素的健康教练和专家在以信仰为基础的环境中使用经过改编的循证课程实施生活方式方案。20名患有T2DM和HTN的成年人(每组10人)完成了基线和12周的评估。采用经验证的糖尿病困扰调查(17项李克特量表;情绪负担、医师负担、治疗方法负担、人际困扰四个子量表)。比较两组糖尿病痛苦的基线和干预后变化;干预组的痛苦减少用瀑布图来描述。平均年龄55±9.6岁,HbA1c 7.8±2.24岁,BMI 36.4±8.8岁。糖尿病困扰(总;平均)为1.84±0.71。结果:参与者报告与情绪负担相关的糖尿病困扰(2.1±0.94)和与方案相关的糖尿病困扰(2.0±0.74)较高;与医生相关的焦虑最低(1.18±0.64)。总体而言,干预参与者的糖尿病窘迫程度有所降低,在HbA1c≤8% (r=0.28, p=0.4)、收缩压/舒张压≤140/80 mm Hg (r=0.045, p= 0.18)的参与者中尤为显著。启示:研究结果表明,生活方式自我管理计划有可能减少糖尿病的痛苦。
{"title":"Addressing Diabetes Distress in Self-Management Programs: Results of a Randomized Feasibility Study.","authors":"Ranjita Misra,&nbsp;Samantha Shawley-Brzoska,&nbsp;Raihan Khan,&nbsp;Brenna O Kirk,&nbsp;Sijin Wen,&nbsp;Usha Sambamoorthi","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0303.06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>West Virginia ranks 1st nationally in the prevalence of hypertension (HTN; 43.8%) and diabetes (16.2%). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are distressed over physical and psychological burden of disease self-management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce diabetes distress and outcomes [glycemic control, blood pressure (BP)] among T2DM adults with comorbid HTN. Participants were randomized to a 12-week diabetes and hypertension self-management program versus a 3-month wait-listed control group. Trained health coaches and experts implemented the lifestyle program in a faith-based setting using an adapted evidence-based curriculum. Twenty adults with T2DM and HTN (n=10 per group) completed baseline and 12-week assessments. Diabetes distress was measured by using a validated Diabetes Distress Survey (17-item Likert scale; four sub-scales of emotional burden, physician related burden, regimen related burden, and interpersonal distress). Baseline and post-intervention changes in diabetes distress were compared for both groups; reduction in distress in the intervention groups are depicted using waterfall plots. The mean age, HbA1c and BMI were 55 ± 9.6 years, 7.8 ± 2.24 and 36.4 ± 8.8, respectively. Diabetes distress (total; mean) was 1.84±0.71.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported higher diabetes distress related to emotional burden (2.1±0.94) and regimen-related distress (2.0 ± 0.74); physician-related distress was the lowest (1.18±0.64). In general, diabetes distress reduced among intervention participants and was especially significant among those with HbA1c ≤ 8% (r=0.28, p=0.4), and systolic/diastolic BP ≤140/80 mm Hg (r=0.045, P=0.18).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Findings suggest that lifestyle self-management programs have the potential to reduce diabetes distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"68-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192112/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Geospatial Analysis of Rurality and Food Banks in Appalachian Ohio. 俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚农村和食品银行的地理空间分析。
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.09
Cooper T Johnson, Rebecca Fischbein, Kristin R Baughman

Introduction: Food insecurity is a problem for individuals across Ohio, including those living in Appalachia. Adequate access to resources that help combat food insecurity is important for these populations.

Purpose: To examine how rurality relates to food insecurity and need for food resources, as well as availability of those resources including food pantries and soup kitchens, in 15 northern Ohio Appalachian counties.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with a geographical analysis was conducted using data from the American Community Survey census data, County Health Rankings data, and regional foodbank websites.

Results: Rural counties had a higher ratio of potential clients per service for food insecurity than did non-rural counties. They also had slightly more children eligible for free or reduced-price lunches than non-rural counties. However, the non-rural counties had slightly higher percentages of residents classified as food insecure and with limited access to healthy food.

Implications: There are more potential clients per service for food insecurity in rural counties compared to non-rural counties. To promote greater access, additional food pantries should be opened in rural counties.

导言:食品不安全是整个俄亥俄州的一个问题,包括那些生活在阿巴拉契亚地区的人。对这些人口来说,充分获得有助于解决粮食不安全问题的资源非常重要。目的:研究俄亥俄州北部阿巴拉契亚地区15个县的农村与粮食不安全和粮食资源需求的关系,以及这些资源的可用性,包括食品储藏室和施粥所。方法:采用美国社区调查人口普查数据、县健康排名数据和地区食物银行网站的数据进行横断面研究,并进行地理分析。结果:与非农村县相比,农村县的每项食品不安全服务的潜在客户比例更高。与非农村县相比,他们有更多的孩子有资格享受免费或减价午餐。然而,非农村县被列为粮食不安全的居民比例略高,获得健康食品的机会有限。含义:与非农村县相比,农村县的粮食不安全服务有更多的潜在客户。为了促进更广泛的获取,应该在农村开设更多的食品储藏室。
{"title":"Geospatial Analysis of Rurality and Food Banks in Appalachian Ohio.","authors":"Cooper T Johnson,&nbsp;Rebecca Fischbein,&nbsp;Kristin R Baughman","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0303.09","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Food insecurity is a problem for individuals across Ohio, including those living in Appalachia. Adequate access to resources that help combat food insecurity is important for these populations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine how rurality relates to food insecurity and need for food resources, as well as availability of those resources including food pantries and soup kitchens, in 15 northern Ohio Appalachian counties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with a geographical analysis was conducted using data from the American Community Survey census data, County Health Rankings data, and regional foodbank websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rural counties had a higher ratio of potential clients per service for food insecurity than did non-rural counties. They also had slightly more children eligible for free or reduced-price lunches than non-rural counties. However, the non-rural counties had slightly higher percentages of residents classified as food insecure and with limited access to healthy food.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>There are more potential clients per service for food insecurity in rural counties compared to non-rural counties. To promote greater access, additional food pantries should be opened in rural counties.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192117/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergence of COVID-19 and Patterns of Early Transmission in an Appalachian Sub-Region. 阿巴拉契亚次区域COVID-19的出现和早期传播模式
Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0303.02
Abbey K Mann, T Andrew Joyner, Ingrid Luffman, Megan Quinn, William Tollefson, Ashley D Frazier

Background: In mid-March 2020, very few cases of COVID-19 had been confirmed in the Central Blue Ridge Region, an area in Appalachia that includes 47 jurisdictions across northeast Tennessee, western North Carolina, and southwest Virginia. Authors described the emergence of cases and outbreaks in the region between March 18 and June 11, 2020.

Methods: Data were collected from the health department websites of Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia beginning in mid-March for an ongoing set of COVID-19 monitoring projects, including a newsletter for local healthcare providers and a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) dashboard. In Fall 2020, using these databases, authors conducted descriptive and geospatial cluster analyses to examine case incidence and fatalities over space and time.

Results: In the Central Blue Ridge Region, there were 4432 cases on June 11, or 163.22 cases per 100,000 residents in the region. Multiple days during which a particularly high number of cases were identified in the region were connected to outbreaks reported by local news outlets and health departments. Most of these outbreaks were linked to congregate settings such as schools, long-term care facilities, and food processing facilities.

Implications: By examining data available in a largely rural region that includes jurisdictions across three states, authors were able to describe and disseminate information about COVID-19 case incidence and fatalities and identify acute and prolonged local outbreaks. Continuing to follow, interpret, and report accurate and timely COVID-19 case data in regions like this one is vital to residents, businesses, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

背景:2020年3月中旬,中央蓝岭地区确诊的COVID-19病例很少,该地区位于阿巴拉契亚地区,包括田纳西州东北部、北卡罗来纳州西部和弗吉尼亚州西南部的47个司法管辖区。作者描述了2020年3月18日至6月11日期间该地区出现的病例和疫情。方法:从3月中旬开始,从田纳西州、北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州的卫生部门网站上收集数据,用于正在进行的一系列COVID-19监测项目,包括为当地医疗保健提供者提供通讯和地理信息系统(GIS)仪表板。2020年秋季,作者利用这些数据库进行了描述性和地理空间聚类分析,以检查病例发病率和死亡率在空间和时间上的变化。结果:6月11日,中部蓝岭地区确诊病例4432例,每10万居民确诊病例163.22例。该地区发现病例特别多的几天与当地新闻媒体和卫生部门报告的疫情有关。这些暴发大多与学校、长期护理设施和食品加工设施等聚集环境有关。意义:通过检查包括三个州的司法管辖区在内的主要农村地区的可用数据,作者能够描述和传播有关COVID-19病例发病率和死亡率的信息,并确定急性和长期的当地疫情。在像这样的地区,继续跟踪、解释和报告准确、及时的COVID-19病例数据对居民、企业、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者至关重要。
{"title":"Emergence of COVID-19 and Patterns of Early Transmission in an Appalachian Sub-Region.","authors":"Abbey K Mann,&nbsp;T Andrew Joyner,&nbsp;Ingrid Luffman,&nbsp;Megan Quinn,&nbsp;William Tollefson,&nbsp;Ashley D Frazier","doi":"10.13023/jah.0303.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0303.02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In mid-March 2020, very few cases of COVID-19 had been confirmed in the Central Blue Ridge Region, an area in Appalachia that includes 47 jurisdictions across northeast Tennessee, western North Carolina, and southwest Virginia. Authors described the emergence of cases and outbreaks in the region between March 18 and June 11, 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the health department websites of Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia beginning in mid-March for an ongoing set of COVID-19 monitoring projects, including a newsletter for local healthcare providers and a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) dashboard. In Fall 2020, using these databases, authors conducted descriptive and geospatial cluster analyses to examine case incidence and fatalities over space and time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Central Blue Ridge Region, there were 4432 cases on June 11, or 163.22 cases per 100,000 residents in the region. Multiple days during which a particularly high number of cases were identified in the region were connected to outbreaks reported by local news outlets and health departments. Most of these outbreaks were linked to congregate settings such as schools, long-term care facilities, and food processing facilities.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>By examining data available in a largely rural region that includes jurisdictions across three states, authors were able to describe and disseminate information about COVID-19 case incidence and fatalities and identify acute and prolonged local outbreaks. Continuing to follow, interpret, and report accurate and timely COVID-19 case data in regions like this one is vital to residents, businesses, healthcare providers, and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":" ","pages":"7-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40411042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Appalachian health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1