Abdalla Aly, Courtney Johnson, Yunes Doleh, Viktor Chirikov, Marc Botteman, Rahul Shenolikar, Arif Hussain
Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).
Results: The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).
Conclusion: UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.
{"title":"The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis.","authors":"Abdalla Aly, Courtney Johnson, Yunes Doleh, Viktor Chirikov, Marc Botteman, Rahul Shenolikar, Arif Hussain","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"6 4","pages":"51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433100/pdf/nihms-1607319.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38300850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-01DOI: 10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001
A. Aly, Courtney Johnson, Y. Doleh, V. Chirikov, M. Botteman, R. Shenolikar, A. Hussain
Background Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis. Methods This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC). Results The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV). Conclusion UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.
{"title":"The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis.","authors":"A. Aly, Courtney Johnson, Y. Doleh, V. Chirikov, M. Botteman, R. Shenolikar, A. Hussain","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"5 1","pages":"51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79528138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Teresita Muñoz-Antonia, Vani N Simmons, Steven K Sutton, Matthew B Schabath, Iffat Alam, Alberto Chiappori, Gwendolyn P Quinn
Background: Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.
Methods: A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.
Results: The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).
Conclusions: Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.
Impact: Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.
{"title":"Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study.","authors":"Teresita Muñoz-Antonia, Vani N Simmons, Steven K Sutton, Matthew B Schabath, Iffat Alam, Alberto Chiappori, Gwendolyn P Quinn","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"5 8","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953751/pdf/nihms-1058738.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37535233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-01DOI: 10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097
T. Muñoz-Antonia, V. Simmons, S. Sutton, M. Schabath, I. Alam, A. Chiappori, G. Quinn
Background Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer. Methods A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing. Results The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008). Conclusions Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations. Impact Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.
{"title":"Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study.","authors":"T. Muñoz-Antonia, V. Simmons, S. Sutton, M. Schabath, I. Alam, A. Chiappori, G. Quinn","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Impact\u0000Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"26 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90810145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071
Shay L Ashline, K. Phillips, Matthew Pakizegee, R. Stefanacci
{"title":"Engaging Patients in Care Through Greater Access to Medical Records and Clinical Pathways","authors":"Shay L Ashline, K. Phillips, Matthew Pakizegee, R. Stefanacci","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77080719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074
M. Willis, C. Neslusan, Silas C Martin, P. Johansen, C. Asseburg, D. O'Brien, Ira M Klein
{"title":"Why Threshold Target Performance-Based Metrics May Not Improve Population Health as Much as Treatment Pathways","authors":"M. Willis, C. Neslusan, Silas C Martin, P. Johansen, C. Asseburg, D. O'Brien, Ira M Klein","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77164728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069
D. Denny, Brandon Bosch, Morgan Hannaford, Scott G. Hartman
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes: Investing in Real-Time Intervention to Improve Care","authors":"D. Denny, Brandon Bosch, Morgan Hannaford, Scott G. Hartman","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73056707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070
C. O. Landgren
{"title":"Role of MRD as Prognostic Indicator, Clinical Trial Endpoint for Multiple Myeloma","authors":"C. O. Landgren","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83244439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072
G. Kuntz
{"title":"How Clinical Pathways Can Support Cancer Center Growth, Care Quality, and Cost Containment","authors":"G. Kuntz","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86225561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-16DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068
M. Munteanu, J. M. Burke
{"title":"Barriers to Lymphoma Clinical Practice Guideline Adherence: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Research Study","authors":"M. Munteanu, J. M. Burke","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72979624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}