首页 > 最新文献

Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care最新文献

英文 中文
The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis. 尿路上皮癌在诊断时分期的真实生活终身经济负担。
Abdalla Aly, Courtney Johnson, Yunes Doleh, Viktor Chirikov, Marc Botteman, Rahul Shenolikar, Arif Hussain

Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).

Results: The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).

Conclusion: UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.

背景:尿路上皮癌(UC)通常诊断早期,并可能导致重大的终身成本。本研究从付款人的角度,根据诊断阶段估计UC患者的终生费用。方法:对相关的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-Medicare数据库进行回顾性分析,确定了2004-2013年期间≥66岁新诊断的UC患者。随访患者从UC诊断到死亡或最后一次随访,以估计终生费用。费用按3个阶段分配:诊断(诊断后≤3个月)、末期(死亡前≤3个月)和延续(诊断至末期之间的月数)。根据诊断阶段(0期至IV期)和接受≥1次全身化疗(LOC)的患者亚组估计UC患者的生存调整终身成本(总成本和主要UC相关成本)。结果:样本包括15,588例患者:3,446例0期(8%≥1 LOC;中位[IQR]随访月:44 [23-71]);3902例I期(12%≥1 LOC;33 [15 - 62]);4301例II期患者(26%≥1 LOC;17 [7-39]);1612例III期(25%≥1 LOC;17 [7-42]);2327例IV期(33% LOC≥1);8[3-18])。中位年龄为78岁,72%为男性。IV期患者的平均终生成本最低(0期,151,626美元;第一阶段,150,123美元;第二阶段,149,728美元;第三阶段:$190,996;第四阶段,117,503美元)。在所有阶段,不包括膀胱切除术的住院费用约占一生费用的一半。膀胱切除术占终生UC总费用的2-13%(3,356美元;$7,011第一阶段;第二阶段11,855美元;$25,509第三阶段;第四阶段为11,693美元)。uc相关的办公室访问占生命周期成本的8-15%(第0阶段为11,717美元;$14,611第一阶段;$19,882第二阶段;$21,480第三阶段;结论:UC仍然是一种昂贵的癌症,III期患者的终身成本最高。在所有阶段,住院费用占一生成本的大部分;这些住院治疗大多不涉及与膀胱切除术相关的费用。需要更短时间和更少住院治疗的治疗方案可能减轻UC的经济负担。
{"title":"The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis.","authors":"Abdalla Aly,&nbsp;Courtney Johnson,&nbsp;Yunes Doleh,&nbsp;Viktor Chirikov,&nbsp;Marc Botteman,&nbsp;Rahul Shenolikar,&nbsp;Arif Hussain","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"6 4","pages":"51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433100/pdf/nihms-1607319.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38300850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis. 尿路上皮癌在诊断时分期的真实生活终身经济负担。
Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001
A. Aly, Courtney Johnson, Y. Doleh, V. Chirikov, M. Botteman, R. Shenolikar, A. Hussain
BackgroundUrothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.MethodsThis retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).ResultsThe sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).ConclusionUC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.
背景:硬皮上皮癌(UC)通常在早期诊断,并可能导致重大的终生成本。本研究从付款人的角度,根据诊断阶段估计UC患者的终生费用。方法对相关的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-Medicare数据库进行回顾性分析,确定了2004-2013年≥66岁新诊断的UC患者。随访患者从UC诊断到死亡或最后一次随访,以估计终生费用。费用按3个阶段分配:诊断(诊断后≤3个月)、末期(死亡前≤3个月)和延续(诊断至末期之间的月数)。根据诊断阶段(0期至IV期)和接受≥1次全身化疗(LOC)的患者亚组估计UC患者的生存调整终身成本(总成本和主要UC相关成本)。结果样本包括15,588例患者:3,446例0期(8%≥1 LOC;中位[IQR]随访月:44 [23-71]);3902例I期(12%≥1 LOC;33 [15 - 62]);4301例II期患者(26%≥1 LOC;17 [7-39]);1612例III期(25%≥1 LOC;17 [7-42]);2327例IV期(33% LOC≥1);8[3-18])。中位年龄为78岁,72%为男性。IV期患者的平均终生成本最低(0期,151,626美元;第一阶段,150,123美元;第二阶段,149,728美元;第三阶段:$190,996;第四阶段,117,503美元)。在所有阶段,不包括膀胱切除术的住院费用约占一生费用的一半。膀胱切除术占终生UC总费用的2-13%(3,356美元;$7,011第一阶段;第二阶段11,855美元;$25,509第三阶段;第四阶段为11,693美元)。uc相关的办公室访问占生命周期成本的8-15%(第0阶段为11,717美元;$14,611第一阶段;$19,882第二阶段;$21,480第三阶段;结论uc仍然是一种昂贵的癌症,III期患者的终身成本最高。在所有阶段,住院费用占一生成本的大部分;这些住院治疗大多不涉及与膀胱切除术相关的费用。需要更短时间和更少住院治疗的治疗方案可能减轻UC的经济负担。
{"title":"The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis.","authors":"A. Aly, Courtney Johnson, Y. Doleh, V. Chirikov, M. Botteman, R. Shenolikar, A. Hussain","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2020.5.00001","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"5 1","pages":"51-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79528138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study. 波多黎各和佛罗里达医生在肺癌中使用生物标志物检测:一项比较研究的结果。
Teresita Muñoz-Antonia, Vani N Simmons, Steven K Sutton, Matthew B Schabath, Iffat Alam, Alberto Chiappori, Gwendolyn P Quinn

Background: Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.

Methods: A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.

Results: The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).

Conclusions: Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.

Impact: Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.

背景:肺癌生物标志物驱动疗法是治疗的金标准,最近的研究表明,在西班牙裔/拉丁裔(H/L)中,特异性靶向生物标志物的患病率高于非西班牙裔白人(NHW)。该研究旨在(1)确定佛罗里达州(FL)和波多黎各(PR)医生对与最佳肺癌治疗和生存相关的种族/民族新基因组数据的知识和感知价值;(2)在肺癌生物标志物检测方面,确定每个地点之间和内部可修改的实践障碍。方法:对FL和PR的医生(医学肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家、肺科医生和病理学家)进行25项分层随机抽样调查。问题的目标领域生物标志物的知识,对测试的态度,障碍和实践行为有关肺癌生物标志物测试。结果:有效率为45%。参与者认为指导治疗决策(82%)和患者个性化治疗(78%)是突变检测的主要好处。PR医生更有可能(p=0.022)相信与NHW相比,H/L有更高的靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变发生率。与FL医生相比,他们还认为缺乏适当的检测资源是主要障碍(43.6%对20.6%)。结论:执业行为因专业和地区而异,并且注意到医生对进行突变检测的偏好存在差异,这表明两个地区的医生明显需要进行教育。影响:对医生进行有关生物标志物检测的教育是改善患者护理的必要条件。
{"title":"Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study.","authors":"Teresita Muñoz-Antonia,&nbsp;Vani N Simmons,&nbsp;Steven K Sutton,&nbsp;Matthew B Schabath,&nbsp;Iffat Alam,&nbsp;Alberto Chiappori,&nbsp;Gwendolyn P Quinn","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"5 8","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953751/pdf/nihms-1058738.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37535233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study. 波多黎各和佛罗里达医生在肺癌中使用生物标志物检测:一项比较研究的结果。
Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097
T. Muñoz-Antonia, V. Simmons, S. Sutton, M. Schabath, I. Alam, A. Chiappori, G. Quinn
BackgroundLung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.MethodsA 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.ResultsThe response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).ConclusionsPractice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.ImpactEducating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.
背景:肺癌生物标志物驱动疗法是治疗的金标准,最近的研究表明,在西班牙裔/拉丁裔(H/L)中,特异性靶向生物标志物的患病率高于非西班牙裔白人(NHW)。该研究旨在(1)确定佛罗里达州(FL)和波多黎各(PR)医生对与最佳肺癌治疗和生存相关的种族/民族新基因组数据的知识和感知价值;(2)在肺癌生物标志物检测方面,确定每个地点之间和内部可修改的实践障碍。方法对FL和PR的内科肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家、肺科医生和病理学家进行25项分层随机抽样调查。问题的目标领域生物标志物的知识,对测试的态度,障碍和实践行为有关肺癌生物标志物测试。结果总有效率为45%。参与者认为指导治疗决策(82%)和患者个性化治疗(78%)是突变检测的主要好处。PR医生更有可能(p=0.022)相信与NHW相比,H/L有更高的靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变发生率。与FL医生相比,他们还认为缺乏适当的检测资源是主要障碍(43.6%对20.6%,p<0.001),而FL医生认为没有常规进行突变检测作为患者诊断的一部分是主要障碍(43.1%对24.2%,p= 0.008)。结论执业行为因专业和地区的不同而不同,医生对订购突变检测的偏好也存在差异,这表明两地的医生明显需要进行教育。对医生进行有关生物标志物检测的教育对于改善患者护理是必不可少的。
{"title":"Use of biomarker testing in lung cancer among Puerto Rico and Florida Physicians: Results of a comparative study.","authors":"T. Muñoz-Antonia, V. Simmons, S. Sutton, M. Schabath, I. Alam, A. Chiappori, G. Quinn","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2019.10.00097","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Lung cancer biomarker-driven therapies are the gold standard of treatment and recent studies suggest a higher prevalence of specific targetable biomarkers among Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). The study aimed (1) to identify Florida (FL) and Puerto Rico (PR) physicians' knowledge and perceived value of newer genomic data regarding race/ethnicity in relation to optimal lung cancer treatment and survival; and (2) to identify modifiable practice barriers both across and within each location regarding biomarker testing in lung cancer.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000A 25-item survey was administered to a stratified random sample of physicians in FL and PR (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, and pathologists). Questions targeted domains of biomarker knowledge, attitudes toward testing, barriers, and practice behaviors regarding lung cancer biomarker testing.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000The response rate was 45%. Participants identified guiding treatment decisions (82%) and personalizing treatments for patients (78%) as key benefits to mutation testing. PR physicians were more likely (p=0.022) to believe H/L had an elevated incidence of targetable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations compared to NHW. They also perceived lack of appropriate testing resources as a primary barrier compared to FL physicians (43.6% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001), whereas FL physicians identified mutation tests not conducted routinely as part of patient diagnosis as a primary barrier (43.1% vs 24.2%, p= 0.008).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000Practice behaviors differed by specialty and between locations, and differences were noted concerning physician's preferences for ordering mutation testing, indicating a clear need for education among physicians in both locations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Impact\u0000Educating physicians regarding biomarker testing is imperative to improve patient care.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"26 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90810145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Engaging Patients in Care Through Greater Access to Medical Records and Clinical Pathways 通过更多地获取医疗记录和临床路径,让患者参与到护理中来
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071
Shay L Ashline, K. Phillips, Matthew Pakizegee, R. Stefanacci
{"title":"Engaging Patients in Care Through Greater Access to Medical Records and Clinical Pathways","authors":"Shay L Ashline, K. Phillips, Matthew Pakizegee, R. Stefanacci","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77080719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why Threshold Target Performance-Based Metrics May Not Improve Population Health as Much as Treatment Pathways 为什么基于性能的阈值指标不能像治疗途径那样改善人群健康
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074
M. Willis, C. Neslusan, Silas C Martin, P. Johansen, C. Asseburg, D. O'Brien, Ira M Klein
{"title":"Why Threshold Target Performance-Based Metrics May Not Improve Population Health as Much as Treatment Pathways","authors":"M. Willis, C. Neslusan, Silas C Martin, P. Johansen, C. Asseburg, D. O'Brien, Ira M Klein","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77164728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Investing in Real-Time Intervention to Improve Care 患者报告的结果:投资于实时干预以改善护理
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069
D. Denny, Brandon Bosch, Morgan Hannaford, Scott G. Hartman
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes: Investing in Real-Time Intervention to Improve Care","authors":"D. Denny, Brandon Bosch, Morgan Hannaford, Scott G. Hartman","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73056707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of MRD as Prognostic Indicator, Clinical Trial Endpoint for Multiple Myeloma MRD作为多发性骨髓瘤的预后指标和临床试验终点的作用
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070
C. O. Landgren
{"title":"Role of MRD as Prognostic Indicator, Clinical Trial Endpoint for Multiple Myeloma","authors":"C. O. Landgren","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00070","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83244439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Clinical Pathways Can Support Cancer Center Growth, Care Quality, and Cost Containment 临床路径如何支持癌症中心的发展、护理质量和成本控制
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072
G. Kuntz
{"title":"How Clinical Pathways Can Support Cancer Center Growth, Care Quality, and Cost Containment","authors":"G. Kuntz","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00072","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86225561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers to Lymphoma Clinical Practice Guideline Adherence: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Research Study 淋巴瘤临床实践指南依从性的障碍:一项混合方法的试点研究
Pub Date : 2019-04-16 DOI: 10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068
M. Munteanu, J. M. Burke
{"title":"Barriers to Lymphoma Clinical Practice Guideline Adherence: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Research Study","authors":"M. Munteanu, J. M. Burke","doi":"10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/JCP.2019.04.00068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72979624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1