Journal of intensive medicine最新文献

Acute infections cause local and systemic disorders which can lead in the most severe forms to multi-organ failure and eventually to death. The host response to infection encompasses a large spectrum of reactions with a concomitant activation of the so-called inflammatory response aimed at fighting the infectious agent and removing damaged tissues or cells, and the anti-inflammatory response aimed at controlling inflammation and initiating the healing process. Fine-tuning at the local and systemic levels is key to preventing local and remote injury due to immune system activation. Thus, during bacterial sepsis and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), concomitant systemic and compartmentalized pro-inflammatory and compensatory anti-inflammatory responses are occurring. Immune cells (e.g., macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and T-lymphocytes), as well as endothelial cells, differ from one compartment to another and contribute to specific organ responses to sterile and microbial insult. Furthermore, tissue-specific microbiota influences the local and systemic response. A better understanding of the tissue-specific immune status, the organ immunity crosstalk, and the role of specific mediators during sepsis and COVID-19 can foster the development of more accurate biomarkers for better diagnosis and prognosis and help to define appropriate host-targeted treatments and vaccines in the context of precision medicine.

Source control is defined as the physical measures undertaken to eliminate the source of infection and control ongoing contamination, as well as restore anatomy and function at the site of infection. It is a key component of the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock and one of the main determinants of the outcome of infections that require source control. While not all infections may require source control, it should be considered in every patient presenting with sepsis; it is applicable and necessary in numerous infections, not only those occurring in the abdominal cavity. Although the biological rationale is clear, several aspects of source control remain under debate. The timing of source control may impact outcome; early source control is particularly relevant for patients with abdominal infections or necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections, as well as for those with more severe disease. Percutaneous procedures are increasingly used for source control; nevertheless, surgery—tailored to the patient and infection—remains a valid option for source control. For outcome optimization, adequate source control is more important than the strategy used. It should be acknowledged that source control interventions may often fail, posing a challenge in this setting. Thus, an individualized, multidisciplinary approach tailored to the infection and patient is preferable.

Background

When resuscitating patients with septic shock, cerebrovascular reactivity parameters are calculated by monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) using near-infrared spectroscopy to determine the optimal blood pressure. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management on the incidence of delirium and the prognosis of patients with septic shock.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China. Fifty-one patients with septic shock (December 2020–May 2022) were enrolled and randomly allocated to the experimental (n=26) or control group (n=25). Using the ICM⁺ software, we monitored the dynamic changes in rSO₂ and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and calculated the cerebrovascular reactivity parameter tissue oxygen reactivity index to determine the optimal blood pressure to maintain normal cerebral autoregulation function during resuscitation in the experimental group. The control group was treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Differences in the incidence of delirium and 28-day mortality between the two groups were compared, and the risk factors were analyzed.

Results

The 51 patients, including 39 male and 12 female, had a mean age of (57.0±14.9) years. The incidence of delirium was 40.1% (23/51), and the 28-day mortality rate was 29.4% (15/51). The mean MAP during the first 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was higher ([84.5±12.2] mmHg vs. [77.4±11.8] mmHg, P=0.040), and the incidence of delirium was lower (30.8% vs. 60.0%, P=0.036) in the experimental group than in the control group. The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]=0.090, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.009 to 0.923, P=0.043) and length of ICU stay (OR=1.473, 95% CI: 1.093 to 1.985, P=0.011) were risk factors for delirium during septic shock. Vasoactive drug dose (OR=8.445, 95% CI: 1.26 to 56.576, P=0.028) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) (OR=0.958, 95% CI: 0.921 to 0.996, P=0.032) were the risk factors for 28-day mortality.

Conclusions

The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management during shock resuscitation reduces the incidence of delirium in patients with septic shock.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ldentifer: NCT03879317

Background

The prevalence of hospital-acquired infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) is increasing worldwide. Several risk factors have been associated with such infections. The present study aimed to identify risk factors and determine the mortality rates associated with CRGNB infections in intensive care units.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study was conducted at Erciyes University Hospital (Kayseri, Turkey) between January 2017 and December 2021. Demographic and laboratory data were obtained from the Infection Control Committee data and record system. Patients who had CRGNB infection 48–72 h after hospitalization were assigned to the case group, while those who were not infected with CRGNB during hospitalization formed the control group. Risk factors, comorbidity, demographic data, and mortality rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

Approximately 1449 patients (8.97%) were monitored during the active follow-up period; of those, 1171 patients were included in this analysis. CRGNB infection developed in 14 patients (70.00%) who had CRGNB colonization at admission; in 162 (78.26%) were colonized during hospitalization, whereas 515 (54.56%) were not colonized. There was no significant difference in age, sex (male/female) or comorbidities. The total length of hospital stay was statistically significantly longer (P=0.001) in the case group (median: 24 [interquartile range: 3–378] days) than the control group (median: 16 [interquartile range: 3–135] days). The rates of colonization at admission (25.5%; vs. 10.6%, P=0.001) and mortality (64.4% vs. 45.8%, P=0.001) were also significantly higher in the cases than in the control group, respectively. In the univariate analysis, prolonged hospitalization, the time from intensive care unit admission to the development of infection, presence of CRGNB colonization at admission, transfer from other hospitals, previous antibiotic use, enteral nutrition, transfusion, hemodialysis, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, reintubation, central venous catheter, arterial catheterization, chest tube, total parenteral nutrition, nasogastric tube use, and bronchoscopy procedures were significantly associated with CRGNB infections (P <0.05). Multivariate analysis identified the total length of stay in the hospital (odds ratio [OR]=1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.03; P=0.001), colonization (OR=2.19; 95% CI: 1.53 to 3.13; P=0.001), previous antibiotic use (OR=2.36; 95% CI: 1.53 to 3.62; P=0.001), intubation (OR=1.59; 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.20; P=0.006), tracheostomy (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.99; P=0.047), and central venous catheter use (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.19; P=0.002) as the most important risk factors for CRGNB infection.

Conclusions

Colo