Mohammad Ainur Nishad Rhajib, Md. Waliul Islam, Md Zakir Hossain, E. Rahman
Evidence based Physiotherapy Management of a Cervical Radiculopathy Patient using Clinical Reasoning Process. Journal Abstract Introduction: Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder in the general population, second only to low back pain. Cervical radiculopathy is a dysfunction of a nerve root in the cervical spine resulting in producing radicular symptom such as pain, paresthesia, weakness, numbness in the upper extremity. Case Report: The aim of this study is evidence-based physiotherapy management of a single case of cervical radiculopathy. This single case was solved by using hypothetico deductive reasoning. Result: After 6 th week of intervention improvement was, found in pain reduction both in resting and during movement and improve range of motion. In addition, disability status also progressed from 60% to 20% Journal of Spine Research and Surgery Conclusion: Clinical reasoning is the foundation in our clinical practice. Mckenzie MDT for cervical spine, neural mobilization, manual cervical traction along with cervical stabilization exercise was effective for cervical radiculopathy patient.
{"title":"Evidence based Physiotherapy Management of a Cervical Radiculopathy Patient by using Clinical Reasoning Process","authors":"Mohammad Ainur Nishad Rhajib, Md. Waliul Islam, Md Zakir Hossain, E. Rahman","doi":"10.26502/fjsrs0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0041","url":null,"abstract":"Evidence based Physiotherapy Management of a Cervical Radiculopathy Patient using Clinical Reasoning Process. Journal Abstract Introduction: Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder in the general population, second only to low back pain. Cervical radiculopathy is a dysfunction of a nerve root in the cervical spine resulting in producing radicular symptom such as pain, paresthesia, weakness, numbness in the upper extremity. Case Report: The aim of this study is evidence-based physiotherapy management of a single case of cervical radiculopathy. This single case was solved by using hypothetico deductive reasoning. Result: After 6 th week of intervention improvement was, found in pain reduction both in resting and during movement and improve range of motion. In addition, disability status also progressed from 60% to 20% Journal of Spine Research and Surgery Conclusion: Clinical reasoning is the foundation in our clinical practice. Mckenzie MDT for cervical spine, neural mobilization, manual cervical traction along with cervical stabilization exercise was effective for cervical radiculopathy patient.","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69348087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
F. G., Gyra A, A. c, Masedu F, M. E., Franchi D, Introzzi L, Lucchelli M, Molesi A, Marinangeli F, B. V.
{"title":"Videolaringoscopy beyond Conventional Endotracheal Intubation in HEMS: A Real Flight Simulation","authors":"F. G., Gyra A, A. c, Masedu F, M. E., Franchi D, Introzzi L, Lucchelli M, Molesi A, Marinangeli F, B. V.","doi":"10.26502/fjsrs0044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69348123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: We have previously reported ten effective serological indicators of surgical site infection (SSI) in the perioperative period after spinal surgery. However, the false-positive fractions of these markers were 0.15-0.39 which frequencies were not negligible. These mean the delays of surgical inflammatory recoveries without SSI. This study aimed to identify and classify the factors associated with these delays. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 320 patients who underwent spinal surgery for causes other than infectious spondylitis without surgical site infection. Demographic data, preoperative serological data, operative times, and operative methods were examined by multivariate regression for each SSI indicator and classified into related groups. Results: Nine significantly associated factors, age, malignancy, preoperative total protein, albumin, J Spine Res Surg 2022; 4 (1): 029-039 DOI: 10.26502/fjsrs0039 Journal of Spine Research and Surgery 30 white blood cell count, albumin/globulin ratio, Creactive protein, operation time, and use of spinal instrumentation were found. We classified the patients into three groups according to their preoperative nutritional status, immune-inflammation status, and surgical procedure. Malnutrition, high CRP and WBC, older age, and malignancy might be related to delays in surgical recovery without SSI; therefore, a single indicator may have limited capability in detecting SSI. Conclusions: We have to recognize the several causes to retard surgical inflammatory recovery. Improved preoperative conditions and less invasive surgery may decrease delays and improve the accuracy of SSI indicators.
{"title":"Factors Associated with Delayed Inflammatory Recovery after Spinal Surgery without Surgical Site Infection: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Hideaki Imabayashi, Atsushi Miyake, K. Chiba","doi":"10.26502/fjsrs0039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0039","url":null,"abstract":"Background: We have previously reported ten effective serological indicators of surgical site infection (SSI) in the perioperative period after spinal surgery. However, the false-positive fractions of these markers were 0.15-0.39 which frequencies were not negligible. These mean the delays of surgical inflammatory recoveries without SSI. This study aimed to identify and classify the factors associated with these delays. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 320 patients who underwent spinal surgery for causes other than infectious spondylitis without surgical site infection. Demographic data, preoperative serological data, operative times, and operative methods were examined by multivariate regression for each SSI indicator and classified into related groups. Results: Nine significantly associated factors, age, malignancy, preoperative total protein, albumin, J Spine Res Surg 2022; 4 (1): 029-039 DOI: 10.26502/fjsrs0039 Journal of Spine Research and Surgery 30 white blood cell count, albumin/globulin ratio, Creactive protein, operation time, and use of spinal instrumentation were found. We classified the patients into three groups according to their preoperative nutritional status, immune-inflammation status, and surgical procedure. Malnutrition, high CRP and WBC, older age, and malignancy might be related to delays in surgical recovery without SSI; therefore, a single indicator may have limited capability in detecting SSI. Conclusions: We have to recognize the several causes to retard surgical inflammatory recovery. Improved preoperative conditions and less invasive surgery may decrease delays and improve the accuracy of SSI indicators.","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69348080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Md Nazmul Hassan, Parvin Akter, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Koushik Ahmed, F. Sharmin, Md Shahoriar Ahmed, Kumar Amitav, Md Ashif Ikbal khan, Shazal Kumar Das, L. Walton, M. Habibur Rahman
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Dynamic Back Strengthening exercise along with conventional physiotherapy for chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) patients over a conventional rehabilitation protocol for chronic non-specific LBP patients. Methods: Between October to December 2021 to a total of 8 patients with nonspecific LBP (5 males, 3 females; mean age: 41.12± years; ranged, 25 to 55 years) were included in this randomized - controlled pilot study. The patients were randomly assigned to experimental (n=4) and control (n=4) group. The treatment period was 3 days in a week for four consecutive weeks where pre & post assessment were done. Data were collected by using structured questionnaires related to CLBP and disability, socio-demographic data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire including the Dallas Pain Questionnaire & Oswestry disability index (ODI). Results: In Mann Whitney 'U', the level of significance is greater than p = > 0.05, and there is no significant difference in between group analysis for all traits of the Dallas pain questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Conclusion: Effectiveness of Dynamic Strengthening Exercise along with conventional physiotherapy was the same in comparison to the conventional physiotherapy treatment for patients with CLBP. In these limited sessions, it has been found that the strengthening program could be started earlier but not for all kinds of patients. As the disability level has been improved by both groups, so it can be introduced earlier with the patients. A complete study should be done with a larger sample size to find out the effectiveness of the dynamic strengthening exercise along with the conventional physiotherapy treatment approach for CLBP patients.
{"title":"Manual Therapy Followed by Dynamic Strengthening Exercise Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Versus Manual Therapy Along With Conventional Physiotherapy on The Improvement of Pain and Functional Disability In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized-Controlled Pilot Study","authors":"Md Nazmul Hassan, Parvin Akter, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Koushik Ahmed, F. Sharmin, Md Shahoriar Ahmed, Kumar Amitav, Md Ashif Ikbal khan, Shazal Kumar Das, L. Walton, M. Habibur Rahman","doi":"10.26502/fjsrs0048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0048","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Dynamic Back Strengthening exercise along with conventional physiotherapy for chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) patients over a conventional rehabilitation protocol for chronic non-specific LBP patients. Methods: Between October to December 2021 to a total of 8 patients with nonspecific LBP (5 males, 3 females; mean age: 41.12± years; ranged, 25 to 55 years) were included in this randomized - controlled pilot study. The patients were randomly assigned to experimental (n=4) and control (n=4) group. The treatment period was 3 days in a week for four consecutive weeks where pre & post assessment were done. Data were collected by using structured questionnaires related to CLBP and disability, socio-demographic data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire including the Dallas Pain Questionnaire & Oswestry disability index (ODI). Results: In Mann Whitney 'U', the level of significance is greater than p = > 0.05, and there is no significant difference in between group analysis for all traits of the Dallas pain questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Conclusion: Effectiveness of Dynamic Strengthening Exercise along with conventional physiotherapy was the same in comparison to the conventional physiotherapy treatment for patients with CLBP. In these limited sessions, it has been found that the strengthening program could be started earlier but not for all kinds of patients. As the disability level has been improved by both groups, so it can be introduced earlier with the patients. A complete study should be done with a larger sample size to find out the effectiveness of the dynamic strengthening exercise along with the conventional physiotherapy treatment approach for CLBP patients.","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69348142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-20DOI: 10.34371/JSPINERES.2021-0052
寧 大島
{"title":"「コロナ禍」に思うこと（まさかの第2章）","authors":"寧 大島","doi":"10.34371/JSPINERES.2021-0052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34371/JSPINERES.2021-0052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine research and surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":"1086-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74568115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：