首页 > 最新文献

MedEdPublish (2016)最新文献

英文 中文
Pilot project on use of social simulation to improve multidisciplinary medical education on health-related social needs 利用社会模拟改善多学科医学教育以满足健康相关社会需求的试点项目
Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19534.1
Tehreem Rehman, Oyinkansola Okubanjo
Background:  Competence in system-based practice in medical education must include training on functioning as an interprofessional team member to address health-related social needs (HRSN). This pilot targets the existing gap on teaching residents how to leverage interprofessional expertise and larger context of HRSN in patient care.This pilot applied the principles of social simulation to teach residents how to work with interprofessional partners to effectively address patients’ HRSN. Methods: We developed simulation cases on HRSN commonly encountered in our Emergency Department. A 9-item instrument using a Likert 5-level scale assessed participants’ knowledge and skills on HRSN before and after the simulation implemented in 2021. Unmatched data largely from missing ID in responses were omitted. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess for significant changes pre- and post-intervention. Results: Thirty-three of forty eligible Emergency Medicine (EM) residents (82.5%) participated in the study. Eighteen of thirty-three participants (response rate 54.5%) were included when matching data based on ID. We found significant differences in self-reported ability to identify patients’ HRSN (p=.0014), differentiate between the roles of interdisciplinary team members (p=.0007), and ability to identify hospital resources patients could be referred to (p=.0018). There was no difference in self-reported sense of empowerment in response to perceived ability in addressing a patient’s HRSN. Conclusions: Findings from this pilot suggest that social simulation can be an effective tool for teaching residents how to function in interprofessional teams and navigate the dynamic larger healthcare context of social determinants of health (SDOH) in addressing a patient’s HRSN. Competence in system-based practice in multidisciplinary medical education must include training on functioning as an interprofessional team member to address SDOH. This pilot targets the existing gap in teaching residents how to leverage interprofessional expertise and the larger context of SDOH in patient care.
背景:医学教育中基于系统的实践能力必须包括作为跨专业团队成员解决健康相关社会需求(HRSN)的培训。该试点针对的是在教住院医师如何利用跨专业专业知识和HRSN在患者护理中的更大背景方面存在的差距。该试点应用了社会模拟的原理,教居民如何与跨专业合作伙伴合作,以有效解决患者的HRSN问题。方法:建立我院急诊科常见HRSN的仿真案例。使用Likert 5级量表的9项工具评估了参与者在2021年实施模拟前后对HRSN的知识和技能。忽略了不匹配的数据,主要是由于响应中缺少ID。Wilcoxon符号秩检验用于评估干预前后的显著变化。结果:40名符合条件的急诊医学(EM)住院医师中有33人(82.5%)参与了这项研究。当根据ID匹配数据时,33名参与者中有18人(应答率54.5%)被纳入其中。我们发现,自我报告的识别患者HRSN的能力存在显著差异(p=0.014),区分跨学科团队成员的角色(p=0.007),以及识别医院资源的能力(p=0.018)。自我报告的授权感与处理患者HRSN的感知能力没有差异。结论:该试点的研究结果表明,社会模拟可以成为一种有效的工具,教居民如何在跨专业团队中发挥作用,并在解决患者HRSN时,在健康社会决定因素(SDOH)的动态更大的医疗环境中导航。多学科医学教育中基于系统的实践能力必须包括作为跨专业团队成员应对SDOH的培训。该试点针对的是在教住院医师如何利用跨专业专业知识和患者护理中SDOH的更大背景方面存在的差距。
{"title":"Pilot project on use of social simulation to improve multidisciplinary medical education on health-related social needs","authors":"Tehreem Rehman, Oyinkansola Okubanjo","doi":"10.12688/mep.19534.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19534.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Competence in system-based practice in medical education must include training on functioning as an interprofessional team member to address health-related social needs (HRSN). This pilot targets the existing gap on teaching residents how to leverage interprofessional expertise and larger context of HRSN in patient care.This pilot applied the principles of social simulation to teach residents how to work with interprofessional partners to effectively address patients’ HRSN. Methods: We developed simulation cases on HRSN commonly encountered in our Emergency Department. A 9-item instrument using a Likert 5-level scale assessed participants’ knowledge and skills on HRSN before and after the simulation implemented in 2021. Unmatched data largely from missing ID in responses were omitted. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess for significant changes pre- and post-intervention. Results: Thirty-three of forty eligible Emergency Medicine (EM) residents (82.5%) participated in the study. Eighteen of thirty-three participants (response rate 54.5%) were included when matching data based on ID. We found significant differences in self-reported ability to identify patients’ HRSN (p=.0014), differentiate between the roles of interdisciplinary team members (p=.0007), and ability to identify hospital resources patients could be referred to (p=.0018). There was no difference in self-reported sense of empowerment in response to perceived ability in addressing a patient’s HRSN. Conclusions: Findings from this pilot suggest that social simulation can be an effective tool for teaching residents how to function in interprofessional teams and navigate the dynamic larger healthcare context of social determinants of health (SDOH) in addressing a patient’s HRSN. Competence in system-based practice in multidisciplinary medical education must include training on functioning as an interprofessional team member to address SDOH. This pilot targets the existing gap in teaching residents how to leverage interprofessional expertise and the larger context of SDOH in patient care.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46471672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The challenging reality of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine in Syria: a qualitative study 叙利亚大马士革大学牙科医学院临床学习环境的挑战现实:一项定性研究
Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19564.2
Ghaith Alfakhry, Khattab Mustafa, Bashar Jazayerli, Khaled Alhomsi, Issam Jamous
Introduction: In Syria, specialist dentists undergo five years of undergraduate education and four years of postgraduate education. In the latter, students engage in treating complex cases as part of their professional training. This study aimed to obtain in-depth qualitative understanding of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine, Syria. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were held with eight postgraduate dental students at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine. The faculty has eight clinical departments; therefore, a single participant was purposively sampled from each department. The male-female ratio of the eight interviewed participants was 1:1. All interviews were conducted between 26th April 2020 and 8th January 2021. Data was analyzed inductively using reflective thematic analysis. Pragmatic saturation was discussed during the analysis and the authors made an interpretative judgement to stop data collection at the eighth interview. Results: Major themes which emerged covered different aspects of the clinical learning environment such as clinical training, social interaction and assessment procedures. Faculty’s negligence of their teaching duties was one of the most recurrent themes. In clinical training and due to faculty inaccessibility, students had to rely on themselves or their senior peers in training. The social climate was perceived negatively and assessment was described as unfair and biased. Discussion: The findings of this study showcased the continuing deterioration of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University. It is hoped that these findings will encourage decision makers to introduce a comprehensive reform that addresses the curriculum, teaching practices and assessment procedures in clinical professional training.
简介:在叙利亚,专科牙医要接受5年的本科教育和4年的研究生教育。在后者,学生参与处理复杂的情况下,作为他们的专业培训的一部分。本研究旨在对叙利亚大马士革大学牙科医学院的临床学习环境进行深入的定性了解。方法:对8名大马士革大学口腔医学院牙科研究生进行半结构化访谈。设有8个临床科室;因此,有目的地从每个部门中抽取一个参与者。8位受访者的男女比例为1:1。所有访谈在2020年4月26日至2021年1月8日期间进行。数据采用反思性专题分析进行归纳分析。在分析过程中讨论了语用饱和,作者做出了解释性判断,在第八次访谈时停止数据收集。结果:出现的主要主题涵盖临床学习环境的不同方面,如临床培训,社会互动和评估程序。教师玩忽职守是最常出现的问题之一。在临床训练中,由于教师无法接近,学生不得不依靠自己或他们的前辈进行训练。社会气氛被认为是消极的,评价被描述为不公平和有偏见。讨论:这项研究的结果显示了大马士革大学临床学习环境的持续恶化。希望这些发现能够鼓励决策者在临床专业培训的课程设置、教学实践和评估程序方面进行全面的改革。
{"title":"The challenging reality of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine in Syria: a qualitative study","authors":"Ghaith Alfakhry, Khattab Mustafa, Bashar Jazayerli, Khaled Alhomsi, Issam Jamous","doi":"10.12688/mep.19564.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19564.2","url":null,"abstract":"<ns7:p><ns7:bold>Introduction: </ns7:bold>In Syria, specialist dentists undergo five years of undergraduate education and four years of postgraduate education. In the latter, students engage in treating complex cases as part of their professional training. This study aimed to obtain in-depth qualitative understanding of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine, Syria.</ns7:p><ns7:p> <ns7:bold>Methods:</ns7:bold><ns7:bold><ns7:italic> </ns7:italic></ns7:bold>Semi-structured interviews were held with eight postgraduate dental students at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine. The faculty has eight clinical departments; therefore, a single participant was purposively sampled from each department. The male-female ratio of the eight interviewed participants was 1:1. All interviews were conducted between 26<ns7:sup>th</ns7:sup> April 2020 and 8<ns7:sup>th</ns7:sup> January 2021. Data was analyzed inductively using reflective thematic analysis. Pragmatic saturation was discussed during the analysis and the authors made an interpretative judgement to stop data collection at the eighth interview.</ns7:p><ns7:p> <ns7:bold>Results: </ns7:bold>Major themes which emerged covered different aspects of the clinical learning environment such as clinical training, social interaction and assessment procedures. Faculty’s negligence of their teaching duties was one of the most recurrent themes. In clinical training and due to faculty inaccessibility, students had to rely on themselves or their senior peers in training. The social climate was perceived negatively and assessment was described as unfair and biased.</ns7:p><ns7:p> <ns7:bold>Discussion: </ns7:bold>The findings of this study showcased the continuing deterioration of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University. It is hoped that these findings will encourage decision makers to introduce a comprehensive reform that addresses the curriculum, teaching practices and assessment procedures in clinical professional training.</ns7:p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135155501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Learning Strategies and Academic Parameters Predict Medical Student Success. 学习策略和学术参数如何预测医学生的成功。
Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19665.1
Michael T. O'Connell, Rohit R. Badia, J. Tellez, G. Cook, Arlene Sachs
Background Student scores on the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), an assessment of academic skills, have been shown in previous studies to be significantly different between U.S. medical students based on their scores in various examinations during the pre-clerkship curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate LASSI and other early academic performance markers for predicting the likelihood of shelf exam underperformance in third-year medical students. Methods A retrospective analysis of student-specific demographic information and medical school exam performance from 220 medical students from the University of Texas Southwestern was performed. Students were then categorized based on underperformance (score in <25th percentile) on each NBME shelf exam and statistical analysis was performed to identify predictors of shelf underperformance. Results For predicting Surgery shelf underperformance, pre-clerkship final exam average (PCA), STEP 1, and LASSI Time Management (TMT) were statistically significant in univariate analysis. Internal Medicine: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI Attitude (ATT), Test Strategies (TST), and TMT. Pediatrics: PCA and STEP 1 quartile. Obstetrics-Gynecology: PCA, STEP 1, and LASSI Anxiety (ANX), with ANX an independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Neurology: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI ANX, Information Processing (INP), TST, and average LASSI, with PCA, LASSI Concentration (CON), TMT, and ANX independent predictors on multivariate analysis. Family Medicine: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI ANX, TST, and Using Academic Resources (UAR), with PCA an independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Psychiatry: only STEP 1 was significant. Conclusion In contrast to previous studies, no single LASSI scale was significantly associated with underperformance on all 7 NBME shelf exams. Univariate analysis identified several LASSI scales that correlated with NBME underperformance, but the drastic inter-clerkship heterogeneity makes use of these scales in early academic intervention impractical. Conversely, PCA was found to be strongly associated with shelf exam underperformance.
学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)是一种学术技能评估,在之前的研究中,美国医学生在实习前课程的各种考试中的成绩显示,学生在学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)上的成绩存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估LASSI和其他早期学业成绩指标对三年级医学生货架考试不佳可能性的预测作用。方法回顾性分析德克萨斯大学西南分校220名医学生的人口学统计资料和医学院考试成绩。然后根据学生在每次NBME货架考试中的表现不佳(得分<25百分位)对学生进行分类,并进行统计分析以确定货架表现不佳的预测因素。结果对于预测外科货架表现不佳,实习前期末考试平均(PCA)、step1和LASSI时间管理(TMT)在单变量分析中具有统计学意义。内科:PCA, step1, LASSI态度(ATT),测试策略(TST)和TMT。儿科学:PCA和step1四分位数。妇产科:PCA、step1和LASSI焦虑(ANX),其中ANX是多变量分析的独立预测因子。神经学:PCA、step1、LASSI ANX、信息处理(INP)、TST和平均LASSI, PCA、LASSI浓度(CON)、TMT和ANX在多变量分析中的独立预测因子。家庭医学:PCA、step1、LASSI ANX、TST和使用学术资源(UAR),其中PCA是多变量分析的独立预测因子。精神病学:只有步骤1是显著的。与先前的研究相反,没有单一的LASSI量表与所有7个NBME货架考试的表现不佳显著相关。单变量分析确定了几种与NBME表现不佳相关的LASSI量表,但剧烈的员工间异质性使得在早期学术干预中使用这些量表不切实际。相反,PCA被发现与货架考试表现不佳密切相关。
{"title":"How Learning Strategies and Academic Parameters Predict Medical Student Success.","authors":"Michael T. O'Connell, Rohit R. Badia, J. Tellez, G. Cook, Arlene Sachs","doi":"10.12688/mep.19665.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19665.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Student scores on the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), an assessment of academic skills, have been shown in previous studies to be significantly different between U.S. medical students based on their scores in various examinations during the pre-clerkship curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate LASSI and other early academic performance markers for predicting the likelihood of shelf exam underperformance in third-year medical students. Methods A retrospective analysis of student-specific demographic information and medical school exam performance from 220 medical students from the University of Texas Southwestern was performed. Students were then categorized based on underperformance (score in <25th percentile) on each NBME shelf exam and statistical analysis was performed to identify predictors of shelf underperformance. Results For predicting Surgery shelf underperformance, pre-clerkship final exam average (PCA), STEP 1, and LASSI Time Management (TMT) were statistically significant in univariate analysis. Internal Medicine: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI Attitude (ATT), Test Strategies (TST), and TMT. Pediatrics: PCA and STEP 1 quartile. Obstetrics-Gynecology: PCA, STEP 1, and LASSI Anxiety (ANX), with ANX an independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Neurology: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI ANX, Information Processing (INP), TST, and average LASSI, with PCA, LASSI Concentration (CON), TMT, and ANX independent predictors on multivariate analysis. Family Medicine: PCA, STEP 1, LASSI ANX, TST, and Using Academic Resources (UAR), with PCA an independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Psychiatry: only STEP 1 was significant. Conclusion In contrast to previous studies, no single LASSI scale was significantly associated with underperformance on all 7 NBME shelf exams. Univariate analysis identified several LASSI scales that correlated with NBME underperformance, but the drastic inter-clerkship heterogeneity makes use of these scales in early academic intervention impractical. Conversely, PCA was found to be strongly associated with shelf exam underperformance.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45758332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking medical students 非英语为母语的医学生医学英语技能同伴辅助教学的有效性
Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19694.1
Ahmad Al Shihabi, Heba Mardini, Ahmad Alkhaledi, Lana Jarad, Rama Jaber, Ramez Jaber, Sara Naoura, Mohammad Bashar Izzat
Background: Peer-assisted learning has been shown to be constructive in numerous aspects of undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking students. Methods: A medical English conversation course was conducted at Damascus University by a group of students. Targeted participants were intermediate level fellow students from the same program. A longitudinal study was carried out between 1st to 31st March 2019 to assess changes in self-assessment of English language skills among course participants. Pre- and post-course appraisal involved a review of previous experience with medical English language, a self-assessment of five English language skills, and an objective measurement of medical English knowledge. In addition, participants were requested to respond to a set of statements related to the importance and the usefulness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills. Paired-sample Student t-test was used to compare pre- and post-course appraisal results. Results: 42 students attended the course and completed pre- and post-course appraisals in full. Data analyses showed a statistically significant increase in participants’ confidence in speaking medical English in public (p<0.001) and using English in various medical settings (presenting and discussing cases, writing clinical reports, interviewing patients and reading English medical texts). Objective measurements of medical English knowledge confirmed a significant increase in participants’ knowledge of methods of administration of therapeutics, knowledge of human body parts in English and familiarity with English medical abbreviations. Most participants agreed that peer-education was effective in teaching medical English skills to non-native English-speaking students and in increasing their confidence when using English in real-life medical scenarios. Conclusions:The present study highlights the effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking medical students. Further validation is required and should compare the effectiveness of traditional versus peer-assisted teaching approaches.
背景:同伴辅助学习已被证明在本科医学教育的许多方面具有建设性。本研究的目的是评估非英语母语学生的医学英语技能同伴辅助教学的有效性。方法:在大马士革大学开设医学英语会话课程。目标参与者是来自同一项目的中级同学。2019年3月1日至31日进行了一项纵向研究,以评估课程参与者英语语言技能自我评估的变化。课程前和课程后评估包括回顾以前的医学英语经验,对五种英语技能进行自我评估,以及对医学英语知识进行客观测量。此外,参与者被要求对一系列关于医学英语技能同伴辅助教学的重要性和有用性的陈述作出回应。配对样本Student t检验用于比较课程前和课程后的评估结果。结果:42名学生参加了该课程,并完成了课程前和课程后的全面评估。数据分析显示,参与者在公共场合说医学英语和在各种医疗环境中使用英语(陈述和讨论病例、撰写临床报告、采访患者和阅读英文医学文本)的信心在统计学上显著提高(p<0.001)。对医学英语知识的客观测量证实,参与者对治疗方法的了解、对英语人体部位的了解以及对英语医学缩写的熟悉程度显著提高。大多数参与者一致认为,同伴教育可以有效地向非英语母语的学生教授医学英语技能,并提高他们在现实医疗场景中使用英语的信心。结论:本研究强调了非英语母语医学生医学英语技能同伴辅助教学的有效性。需要进一步验证,并应比较传统教学方法与同伴辅助教学方法的有效性。
{"title":"Effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking medical students","authors":"Ahmad Al Shihabi, Heba Mardini, Ahmad Alkhaledi, Lana Jarad, Rama Jaber, Ramez Jaber, Sara Naoura, Mohammad Bashar Izzat","doi":"10.12688/mep.19694.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19694.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Peer-assisted learning has been shown to be constructive in numerous aspects of undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking students. Methods: A medical English conversation course was conducted at Damascus University by a group of students. Targeted participants were intermediate level fellow students from the same program. A longitudinal study was carried out between 1st to 31st March 2019 to assess changes in self-assessment of English language skills among course participants. Pre- and post-course appraisal involved a review of previous experience with medical English language, a self-assessment of five English language skills, and an objective measurement of medical English knowledge. In addition, participants were requested to respond to a set of statements related to the importance and the usefulness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills. Paired-sample Student t-test was used to compare pre- and post-course appraisal results. Results: 42 students attended the course and completed pre- and post-course appraisals in full. Data analyses showed a statistically significant increase in participants’ confidence in speaking medical English in public (p<0.001) and using English in various medical settings (presenting and discussing cases, writing clinical reports, interviewing patients and reading English medical texts). Objective measurements of medical English knowledge confirmed a significant increase in participants’ knowledge of methods of administration of therapeutics, knowledge of human body parts in English and familiarity with English medical abbreviations. Most participants agreed that peer-education was effective in teaching medical English skills to non-native English-speaking students and in increasing their confidence when using English in real-life medical scenarios. Conclusions:The present study highlights the effectiveness of peer-assisted teaching of medical English skills to non-native English-speaking medical students. Further validation is required and should compare the effectiveness of traditional versus peer-assisted teaching approaches.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46022866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to cross the line: design principles for interdisciplinary education 如何跨界:跨学科教育的设计原则
Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19693.1
Jessica Oudenampsen, E. Das, N. Blijlevens, Marjolein H J van de Pol
Background: Interdisciplinary learning is gaining popularity in higher education worldwide. Currently, knowledge about how to appropriately design interdisciplinary education is still lacking. The current study presents the iterative development, pilot, and implementation of an interdisciplinary course in healthcare communication. Methods: We used a design-based educational research approach in four phases to construct the program. In phase 1, we conducted a narrative review of the literature and distilled several prerequisites for interdisciplinary learning. In phase 2, we implemented two pilot courses with a focus on the content and the interdisciplinary context of the course. In research phase 3, we implemented the course during three consecutive years, with yearly evaluations of the course. In phase 4, we distilled design principles based on evaluation and reflection of the previous research phases. Results: We elaborate on the various components of the design itself. Furthermore, using data from surveys, panel discussions and interviews, we reflect on the content and outcomes of the interdisciplinary course. We propose seven evidence-informed ‘crossing the line’ design principles for future interdisciplinary education. Conclusions: The developed design principles pertain to interdisciplinary education in general and transcend subject-specific boundaries. The design principles are applicable in a wide range of higher education disciplines.
背景:跨学科学习在全球高等教育中越来越受欢迎。目前,关于如何合理设计跨学科教育的知识仍然缺乏。目前的研究提出了迭代开发,试点,并在医疗保健通信跨学科课程的实施。方法:采用基于设计的教育研究方法,分四个阶段构建项目。在第一阶段,我们对文献进行了叙述性回顾,提炼出跨学科学习的几个先决条件。在第二阶段,我们实施了两门试点课程,重点关注课程的内容和跨学科背景。在研究阶段3,我们连续三年实施课程,每年对课程进行评估。在第4阶段,我们基于对前几个研究阶段的评估和反思提炼出设计原则。结果:我们详细阐述了设计本身的各个组成部分。此外,利用调查、小组讨论和访谈的数据,我们反思了跨学科课程的内容和成果。我们为未来的跨学科教育提出了七个基于证据的“越界”设计原则。结论:开发的设计原则一般适用于跨学科教育,并且超越了特定学科的界限。设计原则适用于广泛的高等教育学科。
{"title":"How to cross the line: design principles for interdisciplinary education","authors":"Jessica Oudenampsen, E. Das, N. Blijlevens, Marjolein H J van de Pol","doi":"10.12688/mep.19693.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19693.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interdisciplinary learning is gaining popularity in higher education worldwide. Currently, knowledge about how to appropriately design interdisciplinary education is still lacking. The current study presents the iterative development, pilot, and implementation of an interdisciplinary course in healthcare communication. Methods: We used a design-based educational research approach in four phases to construct the program. In phase 1, we conducted a narrative review of the literature and distilled several prerequisites for interdisciplinary learning. In phase 2, we implemented two pilot courses with a focus on the content and the interdisciplinary context of the course. In research phase 3, we implemented the course during three consecutive years, with yearly evaluations of the course. In phase 4, we distilled design principles based on evaluation and reflection of the previous research phases. Results: We elaborate on the various components of the design itself. Furthermore, using data from surveys, panel discussions and interviews, we reflect on the content and outcomes of the interdisciplinary course. We propose seven evidence-informed ‘crossing the line’ design principles for future interdisciplinary education. Conclusions: The developed design principles pertain to interdisciplinary education in general and transcend subject-specific boundaries. The design principles are applicable in a wide range of higher education disciplines.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44906752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning. 支持有效性:将技术、评估和学习的应用置于环境中的步骤
Pub Date : 2023-07-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19688.1
Sandra Kemp, Viktoria C T Goddard, Katharine Boursicot, Richard Fuller, Vishna Devi Nadarajah

In the paper, the authors offer perspectives on the uses of technology and assessment, that support learning. The perspectives are viewed through validity (from the field of assessment) as a framework and they discuss four aspects of an interconnected technology, learning and assessment space that represent theory informed, authentic practice. The four are: 1) integrated coherence for learning, assessment and technology; 2) responsibilities for equity, diversity, inclusion and wellbeing; 3) sustainability; and 4) balancing resources in global contexts. The authors propose steps and considerations for medical and health professions educators who need to contextualise applications for technology, learning and assessment, for positive impact for learners, faculty, institutions and patient care.

在这篇论文中,作者提供了对支持学习的技术和评估的使用的观点。这些观点是通过有效性(来自评估领域)作为一个框架来看待的,他们讨论了一个相互关联的技术、学习和评估空间的四个方面,这些方面代表了理论信息、真实的实践。这四个方面是:1)学习、评估和技术的综合一致性;2)公平、多元化、包容和福祉的责任;3)可持续性;4)在全球范围内平衡资源。作者为医疗和卫生专业教育工作者提出了步骤和考虑,他们需要将技术、学习和评估的应用置于环境中,以便对学习者、教师、机构和患者护理产生积极影响。
{"title":"Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning.","authors":"Sandra Kemp,&nbsp;Viktoria C T Goddard,&nbsp;Katharine Boursicot,&nbsp;Richard Fuller,&nbsp;Vishna Devi Nadarajah","doi":"10.12688/mep.19688.1","DOIUrl":"10.12688/mep.19688.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the paper, the authors offer perspectives on the uses of technology and assessment, that support learning. The perspectives are viewed through validity (from the field of assessment) as a framework and they discuss four aspects of an interconnected technology, learning and assessment space that represent theory informed, authentic practice. The four are: 1) integrated coherence for learning, assessment and technology; 2) responsibilities for equity, diversity, inclusion and wellbeing; 3) sustainability; and 4) balancing resources in global contexts. The authors propose steps and considerations for medical and health professions educators who need to contextualise applications for technology, learning and assessment, for positive impact for learners, faculty, institutions and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42407912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immediate and longer-term impacts of fetal surveillance education on workforce knowledge and cognitive skills. 胎儿监护教育对劳动力知识和认知技能的直接和长期影响
Pub Date : 2023-07-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19656.1
Mark Beaves, Nathan Zoanetti, Euan M Wallace, Kirsten R Palmer

Background: Following the development of the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance Guideline in 2003, an education program was developed to support guideline implementation and clinical practice. It was intended that improved clinician knowledge, particularly of cardiotocography, would reduce rates of intrapartum fetal morbidity and mortality. The program contains a multiple-choice assessment, designed to assess fetal surveillance knowledge and the application of that knowledge. We used the results of this assessment over time to evaluate the impact of the education program on clinicians' fetal surveillance knowledge and interpretive skills, in the immediate and longer-term. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of the assessment results for all participants in the Fetal Surveillance Education Program, between 2004 and 2018. Classical Test Theory and Rasch Item Response Theory analysis were used to evaluate the statistical reliability and quality of the assessment, and the measurement invariance or stability of the assessments over time. Clinicians' assessment scores were then reviewed by craft group and previous exposure to the program. Results: The results from 64,430, broadly similar assessments, showed that participation in the education program was associated with an immediate improvement in clinician performance in the assessment. Performance improvement was sustained for up to 18 months following participation in the program and recurrent participation was associated with progressive improvements. These trends were observed for all craft groups (consultant obstetricians, doctors in training, general practitioners, midwives, student midwives). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the Fetal Surveillance Education Program has improved clinician knowledge and the associated cognitive skills over time. The stable difficulty of the assessment tool means any improvement in clinician's results, with ongoing exposure to the program, can be reliably assessed and demonstrated. Importantly this holds true for all craft groups involved in intrapartum care and the interpretation of cardiotocography.

背景:2003年,澳大利亚皇家妇产科学院制定了《产后胎儿监测指南》,随后制定了一项教育计划,以支持指南的实施和临床实践。其目的是提高临床医生的知识,特别是心脏分娩造影的知识,将降低产时胎儿的发病率和死亡率。该程序包含多项选择评估,旨在评估胎儿监护知识及其应用。我们使用这一评估的结果来评估教育计划对临床医生胎儿监测知识和解释技能的近期和长期影响。方法:我们对2004年至2018年间胎儿监测教育计划的所有参与者的评估结果进行了回顾性分析。使用经典测试理论和Rasch项目反应理论分析来评估评估的统计可靠性和质量,以及评估随时间的测量不变性或稳定性。然后,临床医生的评估分数由工艺组和之前接触该项目的情况进行审查。结果:64430项大致相似的评估结果表明,参与教育计划与临床医生在评估中的表现立即改善有关。参与该项目后,绩效改善持续了长达18个月,反复参与与逐步改善有关。所有工艺组(产科顾问医生、培训医生、全科医生、助产士、实习助产士)都观察到了这些趋势。结论:这些发现表明,随着时间的推移,胎儿监护教育计划提高了临床医生的知识和相关的认知技能。评估工具的稳定难度意味着临床医生在持续接触该项目的情况下,其结果的任何改善都可以得到可靠的评估和证明。重要的是,这适用于所有参与产时护理和心脏分娩图解释的工艺组。
{"title":"Immediate and longer-term impacts of fetal surveillance education on workforce knowledge and cognitive skills.","authors":"Mark Beaves, Nathan Zoanetti, Euan M Wallace, Kirsten R Palmer","doi":"10.12688/mep.19656.1","DOIUrl":"10.12688/mep.19656.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following the development of the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance Guideline in 2003, an education program was developed to support guideline implementation and clinical practice. It was intended that improved clinician knowledge, particularly of cardiotocography, would reduce rates of intrapartum fetal morbidity and mortality. The program contains a multiple-choice assessment, designed to assess fetal surveillance knowledge and the application of that knowledge. We used the results of this assessment over time to evaluate the impact of the education program on clinicians' fetal surveillance knowledge and interpretive skills, in the immediate and longer-term. <b>Methods:</b> We undertook a retrospective analysis of the assessment results for all participants in the Fetal Surveillance Education Program, between 2004 and 2018. Classical Test Theory and Rasch Item Response Theory analysis were used to evaluate the statistical reliability and quality of the assessment, and the measurement invariance or stability of the assessments over time. Clinicians' assessment scores were then reviewed by craft group and previous exposure to the program. <b>Results:</b> The results from 64,430, broadly similar assessments, showed that participation in the education program was associated with an immediate improvement in clinician performance in the assessment. Performance improvement was sustained for up to 18 months following participation in the program and recurrent participation was associated with progressive improvements. These trends were observed for all craft groups (consultant obstetricians, doctors in training, general practitioners, midwives, student midwives). <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that the Fetal Surveillance Education Program has improved clinician knowledge and the associated cognitive skills over time. The stable difficulty of the assessment tool means any improvement in clinician's results, with ongoing exposure to the program, can be reliably assessed and demonstrated. Importantly this holds true for all craft groups involved in intrapartum care and the interpretation of cardiotocography.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109546/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48272177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiple choice question writing and medical students: a systematic literature review 多项选择题写作与医学生:系统的文献综述
Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19635.1
Jacob Lahti, M. Salamon, Jordan Farhat, Thomas Varkey
Background: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests have been the standard for ensuring fairness and ease of grading within school curricula for several years. Students, teachers, and researchers alike have developed methods and materials to improve performance on MCQ tests. One practice of interest to the research team is students writing their own multiple-choice questions as a learning methodology. This study intends to review the current literature to assess the validity of student-written MCQs as a study technique. Methods: This literature review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles were pulled via a systematic search of various databases (Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PubMed) performed on 7.17.2022. Forty-seven non-duplicated articles were extracted. These were then limited, following full text evaluation, to a total of five articles. Results: In three out of the five articles there were positive subjective views of the use of MCQ writing as a method for studying, and one article showed that the students did not feel that the process helped them or provided value. In two of the five articles, data was collected on how MCQ writing worked in comparison with students that were not writing MCQs, and results demonstrated that those students who wrote MCQs more frequently demonstrated better exam scores as compared to those who did not use MCQ writing as a study method or utilized it infrequently. Conclusions: This literature review demonstrated some of the preliminary work that has been done thus far on the utility of MCQ writing as a learning tool in medical education. While still limited in overall understanding of the effects of the use of this method, there remains much promise for its use in the medical student population. It is the hope of the authors that further work be done on this question for the benefits of the students.
背景:多年来,多项选择题(MCQ)测试一直是确保学校课程公平和容易评分的标准。学生、教师和研究人员都开发了提高MCQ测试成绩的方法和材料。研究小组感兴趣的一种做法是让学生自己写选择题,作为一种学习方法。本研究旨在回顾现有文献,以评估学生自写mcq作为一种学习技巧的有效性。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行文献综述。通过对各种数据库(b谷歌Scholar、Cochrane和PubMed)的系统检索,于2022年7月17日提取相关文章。提取了47篇不重复的文章。然后,在全文评估之后,这些文章被限制为总共五篇。结果:五篇文章中有三篇对使用MCQ写作作为一种学习方法持积极的主观看法,一篇文章表明学生们并不觉得这个过程对他们有帮助或提供了价值。在这五篇文章中,有两篇收集了MCQ写作与不写MCQ的学生的比较数据,结果表明,那些经常写MCQ的学生比那些不把MCQ写作作为学习方法或不经常使用它的学生表现出更好的考试成绩。结论:这篇文献综述展示了迄今为止已经完成的一些关于MCQ写作在医学教育中作为学习工具的效用的初步工作。虽然对使用这种方法的效果的总体理解仍然有限,但在医学生群体中使用它仍然有很大的希望。为了学生的利益,作者希望在这个问题上做进一步的工作。
{"title":"Multiple choice question writing and medical students: a systematic literature review","authors":"Jacob Lahti, M. Salamon, Jordan Farhat, Thomas Varkey","doi":"10.12688/mep.19635.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19635.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests have been the standard for ensuring fairness and ease of grading within school curricula for several years. Students, teachers, and researchers alike have developed methods and materials to improve performance on MCQ tests. One practice of interest to the research team is students writing their own multiple-choice questions as a learning methodology. This study intends to review the current literature to assess the validity of student-written MCQs as a study technique. Methods: This literature review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles were pulled via a systematic search of various databases (Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PubMed) performed on 7.17.2022. Forty-seven non-duplicated articles were extracted. These were then limited, following full text evaluation, to a total of five articles. Results: In three out of the five articles there were positive subjective views of the use of MCQ writing as a method for studying, and one article showed that the students did not feel that the process helped them or provided value. In two of the five articles, data was collected on how MCQ writing worked in comparison with students that were not writing MCQs, and results demonstrated that those students who wrote MCQs more frequently demonstrated better exam scores as compared to those who did not use MCQ writing as a study method or utilized it infrequently. Conclusions: This literature review demonstrated some of the preliminary work that has been done thus far on the utility of MCQ writing as a learning tool in medical education. While still limited in overall understanding of the effects of the use of this method, there remains much promise for its use in the medical student population. It is the hope of the authors that further work be done on this question for the benefits of the students.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42143679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Grabbing" Autonomy When the Learning Environment Doesn't Support it: An Evidence-based Guide for Medical Learners. 在学习环境不支持的情况下 "抓住 "自主权:医学学习者循证指南》。
Pub Date : 2023-07-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19182.2
Adam Neufeld

According to self-determination theory (SDT), environments which support the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness will facilitate autonomous motivation, learning, and wellness. On the other hand, environments which introduce external controls and power dynamics into the equation will do the opposite. Educational studies support these principles, yet most have focused on learners' need satisfaction as a passive process (e.g., via support or hindrance by educators), rather than the agentic pursuit that SDT emphasizes. In this commentary, I draw on my experience as a practicing physician and SDT researcher, and focus on how medical learners can "grab" more autonomy when the learning environment does not support it. I present a hypothetical case of a preceptor whose teaching style is controlling and unfortunately well-known to medical learners. I then unpack the case and outline different strategies that medical learners can use to navigate this type of interpersonal conflict.

根据自我决定理论(SDT),支持自主、能力和相关性等基本心理需求的环境将促进自主动机、学习和健康。另一方面,引入外部控制和权力动态的环境则会起到相反的作用。教育研究支持这些原则,但大多数研究都把学习者需求的满足作为一个被动的过程(例如,通过教育者的支持或阻碍),而不是 SDT 所强调的主动追求。在这篇评论中,我借鉴了自己作为一名执业医生和 SDT 研究者的经验,重点探讨了当学习环境不支持自主权时,医学学习者如何 "抓住 "更多的自主权。我列举了一个假定案例:一位教员的教学风格是控制型的,不幸的是,医学学习者都知道这种风格。然后,我解读了这个案例,并概述了医学学习者可以用来应对这种人际冲突的不同策略。
{"title":"\"Grabbing\" Autonomy When the Learning Environment Doesn't Support it: An Evidence-based Guide for Medical Learners.","authors":"Adam Neufeld","doi":"10.12688/mep.19182.2","DOIUrl":"10.12688/mep.19182.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to self-determination theory (SDT), environments which support the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness will facilitate autonomous motivation, learning, and wellness. On the other hand, environments which introduce external controls and power dynamics into the equation will do the opposite. Educational studies support these principles, yet most have focused on learners' need satisfaction as a passive process (e.g., via support or hindrance by educators), rather than the agentic pursuit that SDT emphasizes. In this commentary, I draw on my experience as a practicing physician and SDT researcher, and focus on how medical learners can \"grab\" more autonomy when the learning environment does not support it. I present a hypothetical case of a preceptor whose teaching style is controlling and unfortunately well-known to medical learners. I then unpack the case and outline different strategies that medical learners can use to navigate this type of interpersonal conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"12 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450255/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10482868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes 一项混合方法的纵向研究:表征医学生在在线和面对面团队学习课堂上的参与和感知学习的差异
Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI: 10.12688/mep.19535.1
I. Lee, P. Wong
Background: The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner’s needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner’s motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners’ characteristics to explore the levels of student’s engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students’ self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes. Methods: This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners’ characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student’s engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants’ perception on which learning environment better supported their learning. Results: We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person. Conclusions: TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students’ engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students’ needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students’ engagement and perceived learning.
背景:医学课程快速向在线交付过渡,为COVID-19大流行期间医学教育的继续提供了便利。虽然主动学习方法,包括基于团队的学习(TBL),在这种过渡过程中通常更支持学习者的需求,但不同的学习环境如何影响学习者的动机、参与和长时间的感知学习仍然是难以捉摸的。我们利用自我决定理论(SDT)和主要学习者的特征,在一段较长的时间内,探索两种TBL学习环境(在线和面对面)中学生的参与度和感知学习水平。我们假设,与面对面的TBL课程相比,在线课程中学生自我报告的参与和学习的感知会更低。方法:这是一项混合方法研究,49名临床前医学研究生在8个月的时间里,对每种学习环境(在线TBL和面对面TBL)完成两次相同的问卷调查。本研究收集了学习者特征、基本心理需求满足、动机、学生投入和感知学习等方面的定量数据。最后的问卷还探讨了参与者对哪种学习环境更有利于他们学习的看法。结果:学生的自主支持、感知能力和需求满意度、感知学习能力均高于在线学习。此外,大多数学习者认为面对面的TBL更有利于学习,因为学习空间和实践社区的概念是通过面对面来中介的。结论:TBL作为一种主动的教学方法,可以维持学生的参与,因为它支持SDT结构和感知学习的许多方面。然而,在线TBL不能完全支持学生的需求和感知学习。因此,我们强烈提倡在课程中加入任何面对面的机会,因为面对面的课程最能支持学生的参与和感知学习。
{"title":"A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes","authors":"I. Lee, P. Wong","doi":"10.12688/mep.19535.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19535.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner’s needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner’s motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners’ characteristics to explore the levels of student’s engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students’ self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes. Methods: This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners’ characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student’s engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants’ perception on which learning environment better supported their learning. Results: We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person. Conclusions: TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students’ engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students’ needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students’ engagement and perceived learning.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66550312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
MedEdPublish (2016)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1