Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-26DOI: 10.1089/wound.2024.0082
Haley Cirka, Tammy T Nguyen
Significance: The rise of chronic nonhealing lower extremity wounds among aging, diabetic, obese, and cardiovascular patients has surged. Despite a decade of drug testing in preclinical animal models, few federally approved therapies have emerged. This translational gap raises concerns about the efficacy of current wound healing models and the need for improved research development. Recent Advances: To improve commonly used animal models of chronic wounds, researchers have made several animal model modifications to better mimic and understand the microbiota and immune-mediated wound healing processes that occur in humans. Critical Issues: Existing models do not fully account for the differences in skin architecture, healing processes, and immune system responses in wound healing between animal models and humans. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the limitations of a chosen model when designing experiments. As such, findings must be interpreted cautiously and validated in human contexts. Future Directions: Given the complexity of human wound healing, the use of several different animal models tailored to specific biological questions is necessary. Recent advancement in humanized mouse models and microbiota consideration offer a promising approach to study the human immune-mediated response in chronic wound healing.
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Animal Models in Wound Healing Research and the Utility for Humanized Mice Models.","authors":"Haley Cirka, Tammy T Nguyen","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0082","DOIUrl":"10.1089/wound.2024.0082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Significance:</b> The rise of chronic nonhealing lower extremity wounds among aging, diabetic, obese, and cardiovascular patients has surged. Despite a decade of drug testing in preclinical animal models, few federally approved therapies have emerged. This translational gap raises concerns about the efficacy of current wound healing models and the need for improved research development. <b>Recent Advances:</b> To improve commonly used animal models of chronic wounds, researchers have made several animal model modifications to better mimic and understand the microbiota and immune-mediated wound healing processes that occur in humans. <b>Critical Issues:</b> Existing models do not fully account for the differences in skin architecture, healing processes, and immune system responses in wound healing between animal models and humans. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the limitations of a chosen model when designing experiments. As such, findings must be interpreted cautiously and validated in human contexts. <b>Future Directions:</b> Given the complexity of human wound healing, the use of several different animal models tailored to specific biological questions is necessary. Recent advancement in humanized mouse models and microbiota consideration offer a promising approach to study the human immune-mediated response in chronic wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"479-512"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144141276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-14DOI: 10.1177/21621918251359554
Chandan K Sen
Chronic wounds are a silent epidemic in the United States, affecting one in six Medicare beneficiaries-about 10.5 million people-and costing Medicare an estimated $22.5 billion annually. While outpatient wound care costs dropped from $10.5 billion in 2014 to $2.5 billion in 2019, physician office costs rose to $4.1 billion, reflecting a shift in care delivery. Globally, wound care expenditure reached a staggering $148.65 billion in 2022. Despite this burden, federal research funding remains disproportionately low. Chronic wounds often recur due to incomplete healing. Many wounds close by resurfacing without discharge but fail to restore the skin's barrier function-measured by transepidermal water loss at the site of closure-making them prone to reopening. Outcomes of recent patient-based studies advocate redefining wound closure endpoint to include full barrier restoration. The 2023 Wound Balance Framework promotes holistic, patient-centered care, while cutting-edge technologies are reshaping the field. Bioengineered skin therapies can reduce healing time. Machine learning tools, such as scanning electron microscopy-based trainable Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) intelligent segmentation technology, detect biofilms, while other tools predict healing outcomes and amputation risks. Multiomics technologies identify biomarkers such as Fos-related antigen 1 (FOSL1), enabling precision therapies tailored to wound phase and patient biology. Telehealth is proving to be transformative for wound care. A 2023 meta-analysis of 2,397 patients showed it significantly reduced healing time, pain, and amputation rates. Policy is catching up: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services doubled allowable skin substitute applications (from four to eight) and extended treatment windows to 16 weeks. The Better Wound Care at Home Act established national payment for disposable negative pressure wound therapy, and the Lymphedema Treatment Act mandated Medicare coverage for compression garments, projected to save $1.3-$1.5 billion over 10 years. Together, these advances signal a shift toward proactive, personalized, and equitable wound care-driven by science, guided by ethics, supported by policy, and centered on patients.
在美国,慢性伤口是一种无声的流行病,影响着六分之一的医疗保险受益人——大约1050万人——并且每年花费医疗保险大约225亿美元。门诊伤口护理费用从2014年的105亿美元下降到2019年的25亿美元,但医生办公室的费用上升到41亿美元,这反映了医疗服务的转变。2022年,全球伤口护理支出达到惊人的1486.5亿美元。尽管有这样的负担,联邦研究经费仍然低得不成比例。慢性伤口常因愈合不全而复发。许多伤口通过表面修复而愈合,但不能恢复皮肤的屏障功能(通过伤口愈合处经皮失水来测量),这使得伤口容易重新愈合。最近以患者为基础的研究结果提倡重新定义伤口闭合终点,包括完全屏障恢复。2023伤口平衡框架促进了以患者为中心的整体护理,而尖端技术正在重塑这一领域。生物工程皮肤疗法可以缩短愈合时间。机器学习工具,如基于扫描电子显微镜的可训练的Weka(怀卡托环境知识分析)智能分割技术,检测生物膜,而其他工具预测愈合结果和截肢风险。多组学技术可以识别生物标志物,如fos相关抗原1 (FOSL1),从而实现针对伤口阶段和患者生物学的精确治疗。远程医疗被证明对伤口护理具有变革性。2023年对2397名患者进行的荟萃分析显示,它显著缩短了愈合时间、疼痛和截肢率。政策也在迎头赶上:美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)将允许的皮肤替代品应用次数增加了一倍(从4次增加到8次),并将治疗窗口延长至16周。《更好的家庭伤口护理法案》建立了一次性负压伤口治疗的全国支付,《淋巴水肿治疗法案》规定医疗保险覆盖压缩服,预计在10年内节省13 - 15亿美元。总之,这些进展标志着朝着以科学为动力、以伦理为指导、以政策为支持、以患者为中心的主动、个性化和公平的伤口护理的转变。[图:见正文]。
{"title":"Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2025 Compendium of Estimates.","authors":"Chandan K Sen","doi":"10.1177/21621918251359554","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21621918251359554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic wounds are a silent epidemic in the United States, affecting one in six Medicare beneficiaries-about 10.5 million people-and costing Medicare an estimated $22.5 billion annually. While outpatient wound care costs dropped from $10.5 billion in 2014 to $2.5 billion in 2019, physician office costs rose to $4.1 billion, reflecting a shift in care delivery. Globally, wound care expenditure reached a staggering $148.65 billion in 2022. Despite this burden, federal research funding remains disproportionately low. Chronic wounds often recur due to incomplete healing. Many wounds close by resurfacing without discharge but fail to restore the skin's barrier function-measured by transepidermal water loss at the site of closure-making them prone to reopening. Outcomes of recent patient-based studies advocate redefining wound closure endpoint to include full barrier restoration. The 2023 Wound Balance Framework promotes holistic, patient-centered care, while cutting-edge technologies are reshaping the field. Bioengineered skin therapies can reduce healing time. Machine learning tools, such as scanning electron microscopy-based trainable Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) intelligent segmentation technology, detect biofilms, while other tools predict healing outcomes and amputation risks. Multiomics technologies identify biomarkers such as Fos-related antigen 1 (FOSL1), enabling precision therapies tailored to wound phase and patient biology. Telehealth is proving to be transformative for wound care. A 2023 meta-analysis of 2,397 patients showed it significantly reduced healing time, pain, and amputation rates. Policy is catching up: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services doubled allowable skin substitute applications (from four to eight) and extended treatment windows to 16 weeks. The Better Wound Care at Home Act established national payment for disposable negative pressure wound therapy, and the Lymphedema Treatment Act mandated Medicare coverage for compression garments, projected to save $1.3-$1.5 billion over 10 years. Together, these advances signal a shift toward proactive, personalized, and equitable wound care-driven by science, guided by ethics, supported by policy, and centered on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"429-438"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144635963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-20DOI: 10.1177/21621918251366586
Henry C Hsia, Elof Eriksson, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Aristidis Veves, Osama Hamdy, David J Margolis, David G Armstrong, Lawrence A Lavery, Elisabeth A Grice, Greg Schultz, Michael S Conte, Robert S Kirsner, Christopher E Attinger, John S Steinberg, Karen K Evans, Dot Weir, Paul J Kim, Dennis P Orgill, Kenneth W Liechty, J Peter Rubin
Significance: The Wound Healing Foundation recognized the need for consensus-based unbiased recommendations for the treatment of wounds. Consensus statements on the treatment of chronic wounds and acute wounds have been developed and published previously. The current publication on diabetic wounds represents the next step in this process. Diabetic wounds constitute a major problem. Population-based and meta-analytic studies indicate that the presence of foot wounds in patients with diabetes increases their mortality risk by more than twofold. The management of diabetic wounds requires consistent and evidence-driven intervention to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. This consensus statement provides the clinician with the necessary foundational approaches to the causes, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of diabetic wounds. Presented in a structured format, this is a useful guide for clinicians and learners in all patient care settings. Recent Advances: Continuous glucose monitoring and other new tools have facilitated better diabetes management and the management of associated wounds. Diabetic limb salvage should focus on achieving and optimizing function for the patient with diabetes rather than preserving limb tissue at all costs. Critical Issues: Successful management of diabetic wounds requires a multidisciplinary approach encompassing comprehensive assessment, timely intervention, and collaborative care by the wound clinician with providers who can address critical aspects to achieve healing, including careful management of blood glucose levels, optimization of off-loading and physical therapy, assessment and treatment of limb ischemia, control and prevention of wound infection, and optimal pain management. Future Directions: Emerging treatments offer hope and promise, but the heterogenicity of diabetic wounds poses a challenge to performing good studies, which will be necessary to advance new treatments for diabetic wounds.
{"title":"Management of Diabetic Wounds: Expert Panel Consensus Statement.","authors":"Henry C Hsia, Elof Eriksson, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Aristidis Veves, Osama Hamdy, David J Margolis, David G Armstrong, Lawrence A Lavery, Elisabeth A Grice, Greg Schultz, Michael S Conte, Robert S Kirsner, Christopher E Attinger, John S Steinberg, Karen K Evans, Dot Weir, Paul J Kim, Dennis P Orgill, Kenneth W Liechty, J Peter Rubin","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251366586","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Significance:</b> The Wound Healing Foundation recognized the need for consensus-based unbiased recommendations for the treatment of wounds. Consensus statements on the treatment of chronic wounds and acute wounds have been developed and published previously. The current publication on diabetic wounds represents the next step in this process. Diabetic wounds constitute a major problem. Population-based and meta-analytic studies indicate that the presence of foot wounds in patients with diabetes increases their mortality risk by more than twofold. The management of diabetic wounds requires consistent and evidence-driven intervention to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. This consensus statement provides the clinician with the necessary foundational approaches to the causes, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of diabetic wounds. Presented in a structured format, this is a useful guide for clinicians and learners in all patient care settings. <b>Recent Advances:</b> Continuous glucose monitoring and other new tools have facilitated better diabetes management and the management of associated wounds. Diabetic limb salvage should focus on achieving and optimizing function for the patient with diabetes rather than preserving limb tissue at all costs. <b>Critical Issues:</b> Successful management of diabetic wounds requires a multidisciplinary approach encompassing comprehensive assessment, timely intervention, and collaborative care by the wound clinician with providers who can address critical aspects to achieve healing, including careful management of blood glucose levels, optimization of off-loading and physical therapy, assessment and treatment of limb ischemia, control and prevention of wound infection, and optimal pain management. <b>Future Directions:</b> Emerging treatments offer hope and promise, but the heterogenicity of diabetic wounds poses a challenge to performing good studies, which will be necessary to advance new treatments for diabetic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144938809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1177/21621918251366631
Han Wu, Jiunn-Der Liao, Shin-Chen Pan, Pei-Lin Shao, Tak-Wah Wong, Han Lee
Plasma medicine offers an innovative and advanced physical approach to wound care that uniquely combines wound antimicrobial effects (primary goal) and accelerated regeneration of injured tissue (secondary goal). This review explores its transformative potential in modern medicine, demonstrating how this technology can enhance wound healing, reduce microbial load, and improve clinical outcomes. A certified plasma device provides an add-on technology that has the potential to improve current wound care medical procedures by integrating findings from basic research, preclinical models, and clinical applications. This review underscores the significant role of plasma medicine in transforming wound care practices by bridging fundamental research, preclinical validation, regulatory compliance, and clinical application, paving the way for safer, more effective, and minimally invasive treatment strategies.
{"title":"Plasma Medicine in Wound Care.","authors":"Han Wu, Jiunn-Der Liao, Shin-Chen Pan, Pei-Lin Shao, Tak-Wah Wong, Han Lee","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366631","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21621918251366631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma medicine offers an innovative and advanced physical approach to wound care that uniquely combines wound antimicrobial effects (primary goal) and accelerated regeneration of injured tissue (secondary goal). This review explores its transformative potential in modern medicine, demonstrating how this technology can enhance wound healing, reduce microbial load, and improve clinical outcomes. A certified plasma device provides an add-on technology that has the potential to improve current wound care medical procedures by integrating findings from basic research, preclinical models, and clinical applications. This review underscores the significant role of plasma medicine in transforming wound care practices by bridging fundamental research, preclinical validation, regulatory compliance, and clinical application, paving the way for safer, more effective, and minimally invasive treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144870849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1177/21621918251366681
Theja Bhamidipati, John P Hajj, Nehal I Ghoneim, Arhat M Pradhan, Sanjay Mishra, Bharat Gummalla, Ahmed Safwat Abouhashem, Avanish Singh Parmar, Savita Khanna, Sashwati Roy, Chandan K Sen, Kanhaiya Singh
Significance: Skin lipids are essential for various skin functions including maintaining barrier integrity, regulating hydration, and providing protection against microbes and inflammatory irritants. Along with skin health, the role of lipids in the etiology of macroangiopathic diseases, such as atherosclerosis of arteries, is well recognized. Recent Advances: In diabetes, lipid dysregulation is evident and may contribute to the diverse complications of the disease. Diabetic vasculopathy primarily reflects the dysfunction and deterioration of existing blood vessels, as their preservation is key in preventing the progression of vascular disease and reducing the need for compensatory angiogenesis. In the peripheral diabetic skin of the limbs, diabetic vasculopathy runs alongside peripheral neuropathy. Although a causative link between the two is plausible, direct evidence in support of such claim is scanty. Critical Issues: Diabetic skin is known to be compromised in many ways, including weakened barrier functionality and diabetes-induced alterations in the extracellular matrix, likely stemming from chronic inflammation, which may directly affect vascular integrity and nerve health. Both, in the compromised skin and within wounds, microbial pathogens and their enzymes may metabolize host lipids, driving inflammatory reactions and exacerbating the pathogenesis of diabetic vasculopathy and related neuropathy. Future Directions: This review focuses on lipid mediators such as sphingolipids, resolvins, oxidized low-density lipoproteins and their specific downstream signaling pathways to obtain a comprehensive understanding of diabetic complications relevant to wound healing. Through lipid-based strategies, this review hopes to inspire the development and utilization of individualized, precision-based approaches to manage diabetic vasculopathy and neuropathy.
{"title":"Diabetic Wound Vasculopathy and Neuropathy: Spotlight on Wound Lipid Signaling.","authors":"Theja Bhamidipati, John P Hajj, Nehal I Ghoneim, Arhat M Pradhan, Sanjay Mishra, Bharat Gummalla, Ahmed Safwat Abouhashem, Avanish Singh Parmar, Savita Khanna, Sashwati Roy, Chandan K Sen, Kanhaiya Singh","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366681","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21621918251366681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Significance:</b> Skin lipids are essential for various skin functions including maintaining barrier integrity, regulating hydration, and providing protection against microbes and inflammatory irritants. Along with skin health, the role of lipids in the etiology of macroangiopathic diseases, such as atherosclerosis of arteries, is well recognized. <b>Recent Advances:</b> In diabetes, lipid dysregulation is evident and may contribute to the diverse complications of the disease. Diabetic vasculopathy primarily reflects the dysfunction and deterioration of existing blood vessels, as their preservation is key in preventing the progression of vascular disease and reducing the need for compensatory angiogenesis. In the peripheral diabetic skin of the limbs, diabetic vasculopathy runs alongside peripheral neuropathy. Although a causative link between the two is plausible, direct evidence in support of such claim is scanty. <b>Critical Issues:</b> Diabetic skin is known to be compromised in many ways, including weakened barrier functionality and diabetes-induced alterations in the extracellular matrix, likely stemming from chronic inflammation, which may directly affect vascular integrity and nerve health. Both, in the compromised skin and within wounds, microbial pathogens and their enzymes may metabolize host lipids, driving inflammatory reactions and exacerbating the pathogenesis of diabetic vasculopathy and related neuropathy. <b>Future Directions:</b> This review focuses on lipid mediators such as sphingolipids, resolvins, oxidized low-density lipoproteins and their specific downstream signaling pathways to obtain a comprehensive understanding of diabetic complications relevant to wound healing. Through lipid-based strategies, this review hopes to inspire the development and utilization of individualized, precision-based approaches to manage diabetic vasculopathy and neuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144844061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1177/21621918251366644
Marissa J Carter, Robert J Snyder, Keren David Zarbiv, Yael Katz-Levy, Asi Haviv, Ety Klinger, Ofra Barnett-Griness, Chaviva Peretz-Rozenblum, Yaron Shoham, John C Lantis
Objective: This post hoc analysis determined the correlation between wound bed preparation (WBP), defined as complete debridement of nonviable tissue and complete granulation tissue coverage, and wound closure, using data from a published, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-compliant randomized controlled trial that evaluated bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBD) compared with a placebo gel vehicle (GV) or nonsurgical standard of care (NSSOC) in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs). Approach: Patients with chronic VLUs were randomized (3:3:2 ratio) to daily treatment with BBD, GV, or NSSOC for up to 2 weeks and followed up weekly with NSSOC for 12 weeks. Wound closure incidence was compared between those who did and did not achieve WBP by 14 days or anytime during the study. Results: Data were analyzed from 119 VLUs. Among 80 wounds that achieved WBP anytime during the study, 42% healed; among 39 wounds without WBP, only 10.3% healed (relative risk [RR] = 4.1, p = 0.0004, negative predictive value [NPV] = 90%). Among 37 wounds that achieved WBP by 14 days, 54% healed; among 78 wounds that did not achieve WBP by 14 days, only 22% healed (NPV = 78%). Wounds were 2.4 times more likely to achieve closure anytime during the study, if they achieved WBP by 14 days (RR = 2.4, p = 0.0005). Innovation: This landmark analysis confirms that WBP status is an early predictive variable of wound closure. Conclusion: WBP of chronic VLUs significantly increased the likelihood of wound closure and is a critical, though not sufficient, condition for healing.
摘要目的:该事后分析确定了伤口床准备(WBP)(定义为完全清创无活组织和完全肉芽组织覆盖)与伤口闭合之间的相关性,使用的数据来自于一项已发表的研究。综合报告试验标准(CONSORT)符合随机对照试验,评估了基于菠萝蛋白酶的酶清创(BBD)与安慰剂凝胶载体(GV)或非手术治疗标准(NSSOC)对慢性静脉性腿部溃疡(VLUs)患者的影响。方法:慢性vlu患者随机(3:3:2比例)每日接受BBD、GV或NSSOC治疗,持续2周,每周接受NSSOC随访,持续12周。在14天内或研究期间的任何时间内,比较达到WBP和未达到WBP的患者的伤口愈合发生率。结果:对119例vlu进行数据分析。在研究期间任何时间达到WBP的80个创面中,42%愈合;39例无WBP的创面愈合率仅为10.3%(相对危险度[RR] = 4.1, p = 0.0004,阴性预测值[NPV] = 90%)。在达到WBP 14 d的37个创面中,54%愈合;在14天未达到WBP的78个创面中,只有22%的创面愈合(NPV = 78%)。在研究期间,如果伤口在14天内达到WBP,伤口愈合的可能性是2.4倍(RR = 2.4, p = 0.0005)。创新:这一具有里程碑意义的分析证实了WBP状态是伤口愈合的早期预测变量。结论:慢性VLUs的WBP显著增加了伤口愈合的可能性,是愈合的关键条件,但不是充分条件。
{"title":"The Correlation Between Wound Bed Preparation and Wound Closure in Venous Leg Ulcers: A <i>Post Hoc</i> Analysis of the ChronEx Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Marissa J Carter, Robert J Snyder, Keren David Zarbiv, Yael Katz-Levy, Asi Haviv, Ety Klinger, Ofra Barnett-Griness, Chaviva Peretz-Rozenblum, Yaron Shoham, John C Lantis","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251366644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This <i>post hoc</i> analysis determined the correlation between wound bed preparation (WBP), defined as complete debridement of nonviable tissue and complete granulation tissue coverage, and wound closure, using data from a published, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-compliant randomized controlled trial that evaluated bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (BBD) compared with a placebo gel vehicle (GV) or nonsurgical standard of care (NSSOC) in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs). <b>Approach:</b> Patients with chronic VLUs were randomized (3:3:2 ratio) to daily treatment with BBD, GV, or NSSOC for up to 2 weeks and followed up weekly with NSSOC for 12 weeks. Wound closure incidence was compared between those who did and did not achieve WBP by 14 days or anytime during the study. <b>Results:</b> Data were analyzed from 119 VLUs. Among 80 wounds that achieved WBP anytime during the study, 42% healed; among 39 wounds without WBP, only 10.3% healed (relative risk [RR] = 4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.0004, negative predictive value [NPV] = 90%). Among 37 wounds that achieved WBP by 14 days, 54% healed; among 78 wounds that did not achieve WBP by 14 days, only 22% healed (NPV = 78%). Wounds were 2.4 times more likely to achieve closure anytime during the study, if they achieved WBP by 14 days (RR = 2.4, <i>p =</i> 0.0005). <b>Innovation:</b> This landmark analysis confirms that WBP status is an early predictive variable of wound closure. <b>Conclusion:</b> WBP of chronic VLUs significantly increased the likelihood of wound closure and is a critical, though not sufficient, condition for healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1177/21621918251366606
Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. Approach: The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. Results: Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, I2 = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, I2 = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, I2 = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, I2 = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, I2 = 0.0%). Innovation: This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. Conclusion: Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.
{"title":"The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy in Treating Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251366606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. <b>Approach:</b> The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. <b>Results:</b> Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). <b>Innovation:</b> This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. <b>Conclusion:</b> Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with higher mortality rates and an increased medical burden for patients. ON101, a new topical cream, exhibited better healing efficacy than the control dressing in a Phase III trial. In this post hoc analysis, we further identify whether ON101 can improve the healing of ulcers with hard-to-heal risk factors in this cohort of DFU patients. Approach: To compare the efficacy of ON101 with absorbent dressing among various hard-to-heal wounds in patients with DFU, a post hoc analysis of a randomized Phase III trial that included 276 DFU patients was performed by subgrouping those patients based on ulcer depth, location, size, duration, and patients' glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and body mass index (BMI). Results: In the full analysis set, the proportion of patients achieving healing was 61.7% in the ON101 group and 37.0% in the comparator (p = 0.0001). In subgroup analysis according to risk factors, ON101 demonstrated superior healing capacity on Wagner grade 2 ulcers (p < 0.0001); plantar ulcers (p = 0.0016), ulcer size ≥5 cm2 (p = 0.0122), ulcer duration ≥3 months (p = 0.0043); for patients with HbA1c ≥9% (p = 0.0285); and patients with BMI ≥25 (p = 0.0005). Innovation: ON101, a novel therapeutic drug, can modulate the functions of macrophages and demonstrate superior healing rates to conventional absorbent dressing in patients with hard-to-heal DFUs. Conclusions: The results of this post hoc study suggest that ON101 is a better therapeutic option than conventional dressing used in treatment for DFU patients with higher HbA1c, BMI, or ulcers with complex conditions such as longer duration, deeper wounds, larger size, and plantar location.
{"title":"Effects of ON101 for Hard-to-Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a Randomized Phase III Trial: A <i>Post Hoc</i> Analysis.","authors":"Shun-Cheng Chang, Ching-Wen Lin, Jui-Ching Chen, Yi-Hsin Wu, Shyi-Gen Chen, Yu-Yao Huang, Nai-Chen Cheng, Shawn M Cazzell, Hsin-Han Chen, Kuo-Feng Huang, Kwang-Yi Tung, Hsuan-Li Huang, Cherng-Kang Perng, Bimin Shi, Chang Liu, Yujin Ma, Yemin Cao, Yanbing Li, Yaoming Xue, Fang Gao, Ying Cao, Li Yan, Qiu Li, David G Armstrong, Guang Ning","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0167","DOIUrl":"10.1089/wound.2023.0167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with higher mortality rates and an increased medical burden for patients. ON101, a new topical cream, exhibited better healing efficacy than the control dressing in a Phase III trial. In this <i>post hoc</i> analysis, we further identify whether ON101 can improve the healing of ulcers with hard-to-heal risk factors in this cohort of DFU patients. <b>Approach:</b> To compare the efficacy of ON101 with absorbent dressing among various hard-to-heal wounds in patients with DFU, a <i>post hoc</i> analysis of a randomized Phase III trial that included 276 DFU patients was performed by subgrouping those patients based on ulcer depth, location, size, duration, and patients' glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and body mass index (BMI). <b>Results:</b> In the full analysis set, the proportion of patients achieving healing was 61.7% in the ON101 group and 37.0% in the comparator (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). In subgroup analysis according to risk factors, ON101 demonstrated superior healing capacity on Wagner grade 2 ulcers (<i>p</i> < 0.0001); plantar ulcers (<i>p</i> = 0.0016), ulcer size ≥5 cm<sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.0122), ulcer duration ≥3 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0043); for patients with HbA1c ≥9% (<i>p</i> = 0.0285); and patients with BMI ≥25 (<i>p</i> = 0.0005). <b>Innovation:</b> ON101, a novel therapeutic drug, can modulate the functions of macrophages and demonstrate superior healing rates to conventional absorbent dressing in patients with hard-to-heal DFUs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results of this <i>post hoc</i> study suggest that ON101 is a better therapeutic option than conventional dressing used in treatment for DFU patients with higher HbA1c, BMI, or ulcers with complex conditions such as longer duration, deeper wounds, larger size, and plantar location.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"381-392"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-05-13DOI: 10.1089/wound.2024.0291
Surabhi Singh, Fabio Muniz De Oliveira, Cong Wang, Manoj Kumar, Yi Xuan, Deeptankar DeMazumder, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy
Objective: To develop scanning electron microscopy-based Trainable Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) Intelligent Segmentation Technology (SEMTWIST), an open-source software tool, for structural detection and rigorous quantification of wound biofilm aggregates in complex human wound tissue matrix. Approach: SEMTWIST model was standardized to quantify biofilm infection (BFI) abundance in 240 distinct SEM images from 60 human chronic wound-edge biospecimens (four technical replicates of each specimen). Results from SEMTWIST were compared against human expert assessments and the gold standard for molecular BFI detection, that is, peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH). Results: Correlation and Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a robust correlation (r = 0.82, p < 0.01), with a mean bias of 1.25, and 95% limit of agreement ranging from -43.40 to 47.11, between SEMTWIST result and the average scores assigned by trained human experts. While interexpert variability highlighted potential bias in manual assessments, SEMTWIST provided consistent results. Bacterial culture detected infection but not biofilm aggregates. Whereas the wheat germ agglutinin staining exhibited nonspecific staining of host tissue components and failed to provide a specific identification of BFI. The molecular identification of biofilm aggregates using PNA-FISH was comparable with SEMTWIST, highlighting the robustness of the developed approach. Innovation: This study introduces a novel approach "SEMTWIST" for in-depth analysis and precise differentiation of biofilm aggregates from host tissue elements, enabling accurate quantification of BFI in chronic wound SEM images. Conclusion: Open-source SEMTWIST offers a reliable and robust framework for standardized quantification of BFI burden in human chronic wound-edge tissues, supporting clinical diagnosis and guiding treatment.
目的:开发基于扫描电镜的可训练Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis)智能分割技术(SEMTWIST),用于复杂人体伤口组织基质中伤口生物膜聚集体的结构检测和严格定量。方法:对SEMTWIST模型进行标准化,以量化来自60个人类慢性伤口边缘生物标本(每个标本4个技术重复)的240个不同SEM图像中的生物膜感染(BFI)丰度。将SEMTWIST的结果与人类专家评估和分子BFI检测的金标准,即肽核酸荧光原位杂交(PNA-FISH)进行比较。结果:相关和Bland-Altman图显示,SEMTWIST结果与训练有素的人类专家分配的平均分数之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.82, p < 0.01),平均偏差为1.25,95%的一致性限为-43.40至47.11。虽然专家间的差异突出了人工评估的潜在偏差,但SEMTWIST提供了一致的结果。细菌培养检测到感染,但未检测到生物膜聚集。而小麦胚芽凝集素染色显示出宿主组织成分的非特异性染色,无法提供BFI的特异性鉴定。使用PNA-FISH对生物膜聚集体的分子鉴定与SEMTWIST相当,突出了所开发方法的稳健性。创新:本研究引入了一种新的方法“SEMTWIST”,用于深入分析和精确区分宿主组织元素的生物膜聚集体,从而准确量化慢性伤口扫描电镜图像中的BFI。结论:开源SEMTWIST为人类慢性创口边缘组织BFI负担的标准化量化提供了可靠、稳健的框架,支持临床诊断和指导治疗。
{"title":"SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning.","authors":"Surabhi Singh, Fabio Muniz De Oliveira, Cong Wang, Manoj Kumar, Yi Xuan, Deeptankar DeMazumder, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0291","DOIUrl":"10.1089/wound.2024.0291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To develop scanning electron microscopy-based Trainable Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) Intelligent Segmentation Technology (SEMTWIST), an open-source software tool, for structural detection and rigorous quantification of wound biofilm aggregates in complex human wound tissue matrix. <b>Approach:</b> SEMTWIST model was standardized to quantify biofilm infection (BFI) abundance in 240 distinct SEM images from 60 human chronic wound-edge biospecimens (four technical replicates of each specimen). Results from SEMTWIST were compared against human expert assessments and the gold standard for molecular BFI detection, that is, peptide nucleic acid fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (PNA-FISH). <b>Results:</b> Correlation and Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a robust correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.01), with a mean bias of 1.25, and 95% limit of agreement ranging from -43.40 to 47.11, between SEMTWIST result and the average scores assigned by trained human experts. While interexpert variability highlighted potential bias in manual assessments, SEMTWIST provided consistent results. Bacterial culture detected infection but not biofilm aggregates. Whereas the wheat germ agglutinin staining exhibited nonspecific staining of host tissue components and failed to provide a specific identification of BFI. The molecular identification of biofilm aggregates using PNA-FISH was comparable with SEMTWIST, highlighting the robustness of the developed approach. <b>Innovation:</b> This study introduces a novel approach \"SEMTWIST\" for in-depth analysis and precise differentiation of biofilm aggregates from host tissue elements, enabling accurate quantification of BFI in chronic wound SEM images. <b>Conclusion:</b> Open-source SEMTWIST offers a reliable and robust framework for standardized quantification of BFI burden in human chronic wound-edge tissues, supporting clinical diagnosis and guiding treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"393-408"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143959104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1089/wound.2024.0003
Yan Zhang, Shiwen Huang, Yifei Cao, Li Li, Jun Yang, Min Zhao
Significance: It has long been hypothesized that naturally occurring electric fields (EFs) aid wound healing by guiding cell migration. Consequently, the application of EFs has significant potential for promoting wound healing. However, the mechanisms underlying the cellular response to EFs remain unclear. Recent Advances: Although the directed migration of isolated single cells under EFs has been studied for decades, only recently has experimental evidence demonstrated the distinct collective migration of large sheets of keratinocytes and corneal epithelial cells in response to applied EFs. Accumulating evidence suggests that the emergent properties of cell groups in response to EF guidance offer new opportunities for EF-assisted directional migration. Critical Issues: In this review, we provide an overview of the field of collective electrotaxis, highlighting key advances made in recent years. We also discuss advanced engineering strategies utilized to manipulate collective electrotaxis. Future Directions: We outline a series of unanswered questions in this field and propose potential applications of collective electrotaxis in developing electrical stimulation technologies for wound healing.
{"title":"New Opportunities for Electric Fields in Promoting Wound Healing: Collective Electrotaxis.","authors":"Yan Zhang, Shiwen Huang, Yifei Cao, Li Li, Jun Yang, Min Zhao","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0003","DOIUrl":"10.1089/wound.2024.0003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Significance:</b> It has long been hypothesized that naturally occurring electric fields (EFs) aid wound healing by guiding cell migration. Consequently, the application of EFs has significant potential for promoting wound healing. However, the mechanisms underlying the cellular response to EFs remain unclear. <b>Recent Advances:</b> Although the directed migration of isolated single cells under EFs has been studied for decades, only recently has experimental evidence demonstrated the distinct collective migration of large sheets of keratinocytes and corneal epithelial cells in response to applied EFs. Accumulating evidence suggests that the emergent properties of cell groups in response to EF guidance offer new opportunities for EF-assisted directional migration. <b>Critical Issues:</b> In this review, we provide an overview of the field of collective electrotaxis, highlighting key advances made in recent years. We also discuss advanced engineering strategies utilized to manipulate collective electrotaxis. <b>Future Directions:</b> We outline a series of unanswered questions in this field and propose potential applications of collective electrotaxis in developing electrical stimulation technologies for wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"418-428"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}