Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)最新文献

Objectives: This study aims to assess differences in analgesia prescribing in UK primary care between individuals with osteoarthritis who have a recorded exposure to cannabis use and those who do not.

Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study included opioid-naïve patients with osteoarthritis (aged 25-85 years) who were active in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum between 1 January 1995 and 15 December 2023. Patients with osteoarthritis who had current or historic cannabis use recorded were matched to two unexposed individuals by age, sex, smoking status, and health authority. Patients were followed up to assess prescriptions of analgesia. Cox regression was performed adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.

Results: 662 exposed patients were matched to 1319 unexposed patients. Cannabis-exposed individuals were more likely to be prescribed opioids (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.74-2.43; p < 0.001), gabapentinoids (HR: 3.31; 95% CI: 2.34-4.67; p < 0.001), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.72-2.31; p < 0.001), tricyclic antidepressants (HR: 2.64; 95% CI: 2.03-3.44; p < 0.001), other antidepressants (HR: 7.22; 95% CI: 5.24-9.94; p < 0.001), and paracetamol (HR: 3.30; 95% CI: 2.43-4.48; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study suggests there is an association between coded exposure to cannabis in UK primary care records and increased prescribing of analgesia. Given the relative scarcity of recorded cannabis use relative to its prevalence in the general population, these findings must be interpreted cautiously. The increased hazard of using analgesia and mortality within the cannabis-exposed cohort may be confounded by socioeconomic status and a higher likelihood of coding cannabis use in those experiencing adverse effects after consumption or cannabis misuse disorder.

Background/objectives: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a prevalent and life-threatening heart muscle disease often caused by titin (TTN) truncating variants (TTNtv). While TTNtvs are the most common genetic cause of heritable DCM, the precise downstream regulatory mechanisms linking TTN deficiency to cardiac dysfunction and maladaptive fibrotic remodeling remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to identify key epigenetic regulators of TTN-mediated gene expression and explore their potential as therapeutic targets, utilizing human patient data and in vitro models.

Methods: We analyzed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from left ventricles of non-failing donors and cardiomyopathy patients (DCM, HCM, PPCM) (GSE141910). To model TTN deficiency, we silenced TTN in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) and evaluated changes in cardiac function genes (MYH6, NPPA) and fibrosis-associated genes (COL1A1, COL3A1, COL14A1). We further tested the effects of TMP-195, a class IIa histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, and individual knockdowns of HDAC4/5/7/9.

Results: In both human patient data and the TTN knockdown iPSC-CM model, TTN deficiency suppressed MYH6 and NPPA while upregulating fibrosis-associated genes. Treatment with TMP-195 restored NPPA and MYH6 expression and suppressed collagen genes, without altering TTN expression. Among the HDACs tested, HDAC5 knockdown was most consistently associated with improved cardiac markers and reduced fibrotic gene expression. Co-silencing TTN and HDAC5 replicated these beneficial effects. Furthermore, the administration of TMP-195 enhanced the modulation of NPPA and COL1A1, though its impact on COL3A1 and COL14A1 was not similarly enhanced.

Conclusions: Our findings identify HDAC5 as a key epigenetic regulator of maladaptive gene expression in TTN deficiency. Although the precise mechanisms remain to be clarified, the ability of pharmacological HDAC5 inhibition with TMP-195 to reverse TTN-deficiency-induced gene dysregulation highlights its promising translational potential for TTN-related cardiomyopathies.

Background: Patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) have a wide variety of complaints. In some of those patients a possible reason for their complaints might be an adverse drug reaction (ADR). An appropriate identification of ADR in this setting is required to optimize drug therapy and to prevent serious harm deriving from an overlooked ADR. Methods: This retrospective study assessed medical records of patients for ADR as a reason for the ED presentation in two assessments. In the first assessment, medical records were evaluated for potential ADR leading to ED presentation with a predefined checklist by an examiner not involved in initial patient treatment. In the second assessment the same medical records were assessed for ADR identified by the physician in the initial patient presentation. Discrepancies in identified ADR were compared. For descriptive data analysis and statistical evaluation, the McNemar test was performed. Results: From 35,333 patients admitted to the ED, full data were available from 34,747 patients for evaluation. In those patients, 2071 (6.0%) ADR were identified as being the reason for ED presentation by using the checklist. In 828 (2.4%) patients, emergency department physicians had documented an ADR in the medical records. By using the checklist, ADR identification could be improved significantly as compared to routine care, at 6.0% vs. 2.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common chief complaint in patients with an ADR was worsened general condition. Most common drug class causing ADR were antithrombotics. Conclusions: ADR seem to be overlooked in routine care since a significantly higher number of ADR were found by using a checklist-based method as compared to ADR documented as part of routine examination. Therefore, implementing the checklist in the routine process might improve ADR identification.

Background/objectives: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and functional decline in older adults, accounting for over 80% of all heart failure cases. Given the narrow therapeutic window of currently available inotropes and the vulnerability of this population, levosimendan has been proposed as a potential alternative. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of levosimendan in older adults with decompensated HFrEF.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted between January and May 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251032329). Of 379 articles initially identified, 8 studies (randomized, observational, and single-arm designs) enrolling patients aged ≥65 years with decompensated HFrEF met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists. No meta-analysis was performed due to heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and interventions.

Results: A total of 2838 patients were analyzed. Levosimendan was associated with short-term improvements in hemodynamic parameters, including an increase in cardiac index (from 1.65 to 2.37 L/min/m²) and a reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (from 31 to 16 mmHg) within 24-72 h (p < 0.002). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in 30-, 90-, or 180-day mortality (p > 0.05), and findings on rehospitalization were inconsistent. Reported adverse events included hypotension (36-57%) and atrial arrhythmias (9-50%), with low treatment discontinuation rates (5-8%).

Conclusions: Levosimendan may improve short-term hemodynamic parameters in older adults with decompensated HFrEF, but the available evidence is limited and heterogeneous. Its effects on mortality and rehospitalization remain inconclusive. Clinical use should be individualized and closely monitored, particularly in frail patients.

Background/Objectives: Growing evidence supports the use of a single trough concentration, rather than both a peak and trough, to estimate the 24 h area under the curve (AUC₂₄) of vancomycin using Bayesian software (InsightRx^® Ver.1.71). However, patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m² are underrepresented in validation studies. Studies in patients with obesity have produced mixed results, potentially because of different population models used. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated adult inpatients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m². Steady-state AUC₂₄ estimates generated by Bayesian software using both two-concentration and one-concentration inputs were compared. Agreement was defined as a percent difference within ±20%. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients with defined peak and trough concentrations and for comparisons between two Bayesian population models (Carreno vs. Hughes). Linear regression assessed covariates associated with percent difference. Results: Among 82 encounters, 97.5% of one-concentration estimates based on the smaller concentration were within ±20% of the two-concentration AUC_24,SS (mean difference: 2.9%, 95% CI: 0.14 to 3.8%). Similar agreement was observed using the larger concentration (97.5%, mean difference: -3.1%, 95% CI: -4.7 to -0.1.5%). Subgroup analysis for encounters with true peak/trough levels (n = 22) also showed 100% agreement within ±20%. The percent difference did not correlate with BMI or other covariates. Comparison of Hughes vs. Carreno models showed larger variability (only 59.1% within ±20%). Conclusions: In patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², Bayesian AUC_24,SS estimation using a single vancomycin concentration is feasible. Greater caution is warranted in the setting of acute kidney injury, poor model fit, or targeting AUC at the extremes of the therapeutic range. The population model used to generate the Bayesian AUC estimate has a much greater influence than the number of concentrations analyzed. Furthermore, measuring two concentrations does not ensure concordance between models.

Introduction: Reversible and irreversible nephrotoxicity are known complications of tacrolimus. Approaches to reduce the incidence of nephrotoxicity include the reduction or avoidance of tacrolimus but must be weighed against risk of rejection. Infrequently, basiliximab has been used outside of the induction period to facilitate temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI). Objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe renal recovery after temporary tacrolimus cessation with non-induction basiliximab (NIB) compared to a matched cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center study of adult cardiothoracic transplant recipients that received basiliximab beyond post-operative day 7 for temporary tacrolimus cessation in the setting of AKI between January 2019 and November 2023 and matched them to acontrol cohort. Results: Twelve patients underwent temporary tacrolimus cessation with NIB. In total, 7 (58%) patients achieved initial renal recovery at tacrolimus resumption compared to 15 (42%) patients in the matched cohort at an equivalent time point. No difference between treated rejection (17% vs. 19%, p = 0.80) or infection (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.32) was observed between tacrolimus cessation and its matched cohort. Conclusions: The use of NIB for tacrolimus cessation can allow for potential renal recovery after an AKI or in patients at risk of AKI. This approach does not appear to significantly increase the risk of rejection but may increase the risk of infection in the long term.

Background/objectives: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated with increased rates of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The difference in the management and outcomes of SGLT2i-associated DKA (SGLT2i DKA) from non-SGLT2i-associated DKA (non-SGLT2i DKA) remains unclear due to a lack of specific reporting on dextrose and insulin. This study aims to compare the management and outcome of SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i diabetic ketoacidosis.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for diabetic ketosis between 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 at a tertiary hospital were identified. For each SGLT2i diabetic ketosis, two non-SGLT2i diabetic ketosis admissions closest to the SGLT2i admission date were evaluated for comparison. Clinical data including biochemistry, ICU length of stay (LOS), time to normalize acidemia and ketonemia, dextrose and insulin requirements, were evaluated.

Results: In the SGLT2i group (n = 30), there were 22 DKA and 8 diabetic ketosis cases; in the non-SGLT2i group (n = 60), there were 54 DKA and 6 diabetic ketosis cases. SGLT2i DKA (n = 22) required 62% greater total insulin (154 [117-249] vs. 95 [59-150] units; p = 0.004), which remained statistically significant after weight adjustment (p = 0.02), and longer ICU LOS (52 [42-97] vs. 39 [23-68] hours; p = 0.01) compared to non-SGLT2i DKA (n = 54), despite a comparable time to DKA resolution (22 [15-35] vs. 20 [15-35] hours; p = 0.91). In the intercurrent illness subgroup analysis, neither total insulin dose nor ICU LOS remained statistically significantly different between SGLT2i (n = 16) and non-SGLT2i DKA (n = 21). The majority of cases received 10% dextrose and variable rate intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII).

Conclusions: The greater insulin requirement in SGLT2i DKA compared to non-SGLT2i DKA may be explained by the greater proportion of precipitating intercurrent illnesses and demographic differences in SGLT2i DKA, highlighting that SGLT2i DKA (predominantly comprising T2D) and non-SGLT2i DKA (predominantly comprising T1D) represent distinct clinical entities. Our findings in comparison to the literature imply that in SGLT2i DKA, the need for prolonged IV insulin infusion may be reduced through intensive management using intravenous 10% dextrose and VRIII. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of different management strategies for SGLT2i DKA.

Objective: The impact of a febrile neutropenia (FN) emergency department (ED) triage screening tool and protocol on time to antibiotic administration (TTA) and patient outcomes was evaluated. Methods: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult FN patients admitted through the ED from April 2014 to April 2017. In March 2016 a triage screening tool and protocol were implemented. In patients who screened positive, nursing initiated a protocol that included laboratory diagnostics and a pharmacy consult for empiric antibiotics prior to evaluation by a provider. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-protocol for TTA, 30-day mortality, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the study, 77 pre-protocol and 53 post-protocol. Median TTA was longer in the pre-protocol group at 174 min (interquartile range [IQR] 105-224) vs. 109 min (IQR 71-214) post-protocol, p = 0.04. Thirty-day mortality was greater at 18.8% pre-protocol vs. 7.5% post-protocol, p = 0.12. There was no difference in hospital LOS. Pre-protocol patients compared to post-protocol patients who had a pharmacy consult demonstrated a further reduction in TTA (174 min [IQR 105-224] vs. 87.5 min [IQR 61.5-135], p < 0.01) and a reduced mortality (18% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol for febrile neutropenia that allows pharmacists to order antibiotics based on a nurse triage assessment. Evaluation of the protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in TTA and trend toward improved mortality.

Obesity is a growing global health concern with widespread impacts on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Clinically, it is a major driver of type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cancer, reducing life expectancy by 5-20 years and imposing a staggering economic burden of USD 2 trillion annually (2.8% of global GDP). Despite its significant health and socioeconomic impact, earlier obesity medications, such as fenfluramine, sibutramine, and orlistat, fell short of expectations due to limited effectiveness, serious side effects including valvular heart disease and gastrointestinal issues, and high rates of treatment discontinuation. The advent of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) has revolutionized obesity management. These agents demonstrate unprecedented efficacy, achieving 15-25% mean weight loss in clinical trials, alongside reducing major adverse cardiovascular events by 20% and T2D incidence by 72%. Emerging therapies, including oral GLP-1 agonists and triple-receptor agonists (e.g., retatrutide), promise enhanced tolerability and muscle preservation, potentially bridging the efficacy gap with bariatric surgery. However, challenges persist. High costs, supply shortages, and unequal access pose significant barriers to the widespread implementation of obesity treatment, particularly in low-resource settings. Gastrointestinal side effects and long-term safety concerns require close monitoring, while weight regain after medication discontinuation emphasizes the need for ongoing adherence and lifestyle support. This review highlights the transformative potential of incretin-based therapies while advocating for policy reforms to address cost barriers, equitable access, and preventive strategies. Future research must prioritize long-term cardiovascular outcome trials and mitigate emerging risks, such as sarcopenia and joint degeneration. A multidisciplinary approach combining pharmacotherapy, behavioral interventions, and systemic policy changes is critical to curbing the obesity epidemic and its downstream consequences.

Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most significant modifying risk factor for the development of cardioembolic stroke, which is associated with worse outcomes and higher intrahospital mortality compared to other types of ischemic stroke. Antithrombotic medications are administered as prophylactic treatment in patients with a risk of stroke. The aim of this study was to determine outcome measures in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke and AF regarding prior antithrombotic therapy. Methods: We collected data on stroke risk factors, CHADS₂ score, and international normalized ratio (INR) value in the context of warfarin therapy, as well as data related to localization, stroke severity, and functional outcome at discharge. Results: A total of 754 subjects with first-ever ischemic stroke and AF were included in this cross-sectional study (122 on warfarin, 210 on acetylsalicylic acid, and 422 without prior antithrombotic therapy). The diagnosis of AF was previously unknown in 31% of the subjects. Stroke risk factors (arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and cardiomyopathy) were significantly lower in the group without prior antithrombotic therapy. The anticoagulant group was significantly younger (p = 0.001). Overall, 45.4% of subjects with a previously known AF event and a high risk of developing stroke received anticoagulant therapy. Participants on warfarin had a significantly better functional outcome than those on antiplatelet therapy or without prior antithrombotic therapy (median mRS 4 vs. 5 vs. 5; p = 0.025) and lower NIHSS scores, although the difference was not statistically significant (median 10 vs. 12 vs. 12; p = 0.09). There was no difference between stroke localization among groups (p = 0.116). Conclusions: Our study showed that, in our cohort, first-ever ischemic stroke due to AF was more common in women. Subjects on prior anticoagulant therapy had more favorable outcomes at discharge.