Pub Date : 2025-06-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-91
Arvind Subramaniam, Elizabeth Hensley, Jhana Parikh, Abhinav Gundala, Shannon H Ford, Olivia Fernandez, Caroline Vuong, Nirmish Shah
Background: Digital health tools have grown in their usage and popularity since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, when healthcare providers were required to find methods of monitoring and engaging with their patients while also practicing social distancing. The process of building any digital product is arduous and complicated, and successful deployment within a healthcare system involves navigating a complex landscape of regulations, cybersecurity requirements, and the unique considerations of each healthcare institution, in addition to managing general product maintenance and adapting to ongoing technological advancements. The aim of this study was to utilize stakeholder feedback to create an improved, modular, scalable, and disease agnostic digital health solution while also identifying common challenges and considerations for deploying health technology.
Methods: Our large interdisciplinary team has been part of several digital health solutions that have been utilized in multiple areas of healthcare. Here, we discuss this journey, lessons learned and describe the recent culmination of this work in the development of Nanbar Health, a digital health solution that integrates patient-reported symptoms via a mobile application, biometrics collected from smartwatches and wearables, and electronic health record (EHR) data to build complex symptom networks and predictive algorithms, all with the goal of better understanding the disease experience of individuals living with various illnesses.
Results: This article provides details about our previously built tools, methodology, challenges, insights, and the findings our team made during the development process, alongside considerations that should be made during the development and integration of any digital health solution.
Conclusions: Nanbar Health is a comprehensive digital health tool developed over multiple years by an interdisciplinary team, utilizing user-centered design, longitudinal data, and predictive algorithms to better understand an individual's illness experiences. The development of such digital health solutions requires extensive planning, efficient multidisciplinary teamwork, and careful consideration of factors needed to build sustainable and modular mobile health (mHealth) apps. Future improvements should focus on developing disease-agnostic solutions, improving data capture strategies, and creating streamlined processes for EHR integration to enhance healthcare technology adoption and patient care.
{"title":"Careful considerations for digital health innovation: developing Nanbar Health-a digital health solution empowering clinical decisions with data-driven insights.","authors":"Arvind Subramaniam, Elizabeth Hensley, Jhana Parikh, Abhinav Gundala, Shannon H Ford, Olivia Fernandez, Caroline Vuong, Nirmish Shah","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-91","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-91","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health tools have grown in their usage and popularity since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, when healthcare providers were required to find methods of monitoring and engaging with their patients while also practicing social distancing. The process of building any digital product is arduous and complicated, and successful deployment within a healthcare system involves navigating a complex landscape of regulations, cybersecurity requirements, and the unique considerations of each healthcare institution, in addition to managing general product maintenance and adapting to ongoing technological advancements. The aim of this study was to utilize stakeholder feedback to create an improved, modular, scalable, and disease agnostic digital health solution while also identifying common challenges and considerations for deploying health technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our large interdisciplinary team has been part of several digital health solutions that have been utilized in multiple areas of healthcare. Here, we discuss this journey, lessons learned and describe the recent culmination of this work in the development of Nanbar Health, a digital health solution that integrates patient-reported symptoms via a mobile application, biometrics collected from smartwatches and wearables, and electronic health record (EHR) data to build complex symptom networks and predictive algorithms, all with the goal of better understanding the disease experience of individuals living with various illnesses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This article provides details about our previously built tools, methodology, challenges, insights, and the findings our team made during the development process, alongside considerations that should be made during the development and integration of any digital health solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nanbar Health is a comprehensive digital health tool developed over multiple years by an interdisciplinary team, utilizing user-centered design, longitudinal data, and predictive algorithms to better understand an individual's illness experiences. The development of such digital health solutions requires extensive planning, efficient multidisciplinary teamwork, and careful consideration of factors needed to build sustainable and modular mobile health (mHealth) apps. Future improvements should focus on developing disease-agnostic solutions, improving data capture strategies, and creating streamlined processes for EHR integration to enhance healthcare technology adoption and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-15eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-70
Gabrielle M Salvatore, Angelica R Rivera, Iris Bercovitz, Giada Benasi, Danielle Arigo
Background: Physical activity (PA) is crucial for health promotion and chronic illness prevention. As chronic illness is increasing among women in young adulthood, there is an urgent need for effective strategies to encourage PA in this population. An improved understanding of PA behaviors and their determinants in daily life among women of reproductive age (i.e., ages 18-50 years) would help to inform intervention efforts. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize methods and evidence for studies of time-sensitive predictors of PA among women of reproductive age, and to identify key gaps to be addressed.
Methods: Searches in Academic Search Complete, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science identified observational or experimental studies that used a mobile tool (e.g., wearable PA sensor). Studies were eligible for inclusion if the primary outcome was objectively assessed PA, the predictor was assessed at least once daily, and if participants did not have a medical or psychiatric contraindication to performing PA.
Results: Of the initial 1,874 results, 7 articles that described 6 unique studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 858 participants. Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 292, and mean age from 20.0 to 42.1 years. We summarized participant characteristics, study characteristics, and findings. Most studies were observational (71.4%). Common PA outcomes were step count and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA, assessed using commercially available or research-grade devices. PA predictors were assessed at 2 levels (i.e., person or day/moment), with considerable variability in the frequency of assessment.
Conclusions: This review highlights strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence base and identifies key opportunities for advancing our understanding of PA behaviors among women of reproductive age.
背景:体育活动(PA)对促进健康和预防慢性疾病至关重要。由于成年女性中慢性疾病的增加,迫切需要有效的策略来鼓励这一人群的PA。提高对育龄妇女(即18-50岁)PA行为及其在日常生活中的决定因素的了解将有助于为干预工作提供信息。本综述的目的是综合研究育龄妇女前列腺癌的时间敏感预测因素的方法和证据,并确定需要解决的关键差距。方法:在Academic Search Complete, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo和Web of Science中搜索,确定使用移动工具(例如,可穿戴式PA传感器)的观察或实验研究。如果主要结果是客观评估PA,预测因子每天至少评估一次,并且受试者对PA没有医学或精神禁忌症,则研究符合纳入条件。结果:在最初的1874项结果中,7篇描述了6项独特研究的文章符合纳入标准,共有858名参与者。样本量为30至292人,平均年龄为20.0至42.1岁。我们总结了参与者特征、研究特征和研究结果。大多数研究为观察性研究(71.4%)。常见的PA结果是步数和中度至剧烈PA的分钟数,使用市售或研究级设备进行评估。PA预测因子在2个水平(即,人或日/时刻)进行评估,评估频率有相当大的可变性。结论:本综述强调了现有证据基础的优势和不足,并确定了促进我们对育龄妇女PA行为理解的关键机会。
{"title":"Predictors of physical activity in daily life among women of reproductive age: a scoping review.","authors":"Gabrielle M Salvatore, Angelica R Rivera, Iris Bercovitz, Giada Benasi, Danielle Arigo","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-70","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-70","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) is crucial for health promotion and chronic illness prevention. As chronic illness is increasing among women in young adulthood, there is an urgent need for effective strategies to encourage PA in this population. An improved understanding of PA behaviors and their determinants in daily life among women of reproductive age (i.e., ages 18-50 years) would help to inform intervention efforts. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize methods and evidence for studies of time-sensitive predictors of PA among women of reproductive age, and to identify key gaps to be addressed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches in Academic Search Complete, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science identified observational or experimental studies that used a mobile tool (e.g., wearable PA sensor). Studies were eligible for inclusion if the primary outcome was objectively assessed PA, the predictor was assessed at least once daily, and if participants did not have a medical or psychiatric contraindication to performing PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 1,874 results, 7 articles that described 6 unique studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 858 participants. Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 292, and mean age from 20.0 to 42.1 years. We summarized participant characteristics, study characteristics, and findings. Most studies were observational (71.4%). Common PA outcomes were step count and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA, assessed using commercially available or research-grade devices. PA predictors were assessed at 2 levels (i.e., person or day/moment), with considerable variability in the frequency of assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence base and identifies key opportunities for advancing our understanding of PA behaviors among women of reproductive age.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-86
Yossef Alnasser, Tigist Bacha, James Okereke, Sarah Erum
Background: For telemedicine to be implemented and sustained in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), it must be accessible, equitable, affordable, and compatible with current infrastructures. This study is to evaluate the views of pediatric healthcare practitioners in Ethiopia toward using an instant messaging app (Telegram) to conduct tele-consultations and asynchronous medical education.
Methods: The study adopted a qualitative method via in-person interviews or message exchange to get greater insights and deeper meanings of pediatric doctors in Ethiopia about the use of Telegram chat groups for teleconsultations and medical education. Coding and Thematic analysis were applied to identify common themes and data analysis.
Results: The study attracted ten pediatric doctors for in-depth interviews and four text exchanges. All participants expressed positive attitudes toward telemedicine through simpler phone-based platforms. Telegram was the preferred application over WhatsApp and Zoom due to its compatibility with limited internet connections, multidimensional views of data, and an unlimited number of participants. Having a Telegram chat made it easy to get teleconsultation and improve pediatric knowledge. Pediatricians from non-academic institutions and rural areas viewed the chat group as a source of continuous medical education. A rural pediatrician stated, "In our hospital, we don't have morning sessions or case presentations, so it (the group) gives us a platform to read further, to learn further." Residents found Telegram as a vital tool for their learning, with one resident stating, "I think Telegram is part of our residency." Lack of consultation culture, fear of being judged, and hierarchy limited the number of teleconsultations and participation in educational discussions. Internet availability, digital divide, lack of physical exam, and privacy concerns were the main barriers to using Telegram for teleconsultations. Having international experts to answer consultations was viewed as a challenge and an advantage at the same time. It is a challenge when the international expert does not understand the culture or local resources. It is an advantage as the expert can introduce new updates and innovative interventions. A pediatrician said, "There are different groups of experts from here and from abroad as well…Yeah, that makes it an ideal thing.".
Conclusions: Telegram is already used by pediatric providers in Ethiopia for telemedicine and medical education. This affordable intervention can improve access and ease the burden of consultations for all providers while meeting current infrastructure. It has potential to be scaled up and regulated to improve pediatric telemedicine in Ethiopia and many LMIC.
{"title":"Keep it simple: telemedicine to support pediatric care in Ethiopia through existing instant messaging applications.","authors":"Yossef Alnasser, Tigist Bacha, James Okereke, Sarah Erum","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-86","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-86","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For telemedicine to be implemented and sustained in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), it must be accessible, equitable, affordable, and compatible with current infrastructures. This study is to evaluate the views of pediatric healthcare practitioners in Ethiopia toward using an instant messaging app (Telegram) to conduct tele-consultations and asynchronous medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adopted a qualitative method via in-person interviews or message exchange to get greater insights and deeper meanings of pediatric doctors in Ethiopia about the use of Telegram chat groups for teleconsultations and medical education. Coding and Thematic analysis were applied to identify common themes and data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study attracted ten pediatric doctors for in-depth interviews and four text exchanges. All participants expressed positive attitudes toward telemedicine through simpler phone-based platforms. Telegram was the preferred application over WhatsApp and Zoom due to its compatibility with limited internet connections, multidimensional views of data, and an unlimited number of participants. Having a Telegram chat made it easy to get teleconsultation and improve pediatric knowledge. Pediatricians from non-academic institutions and rural areas viewed the chat group as a source of continuous medical education. A rural pediatrician stated, \"<i>In our hospital, we don't have morning sessions or case presentations, so it (the group) gives us a platform to read further, to learn further.</i>\" Residents found Telegram as a vital tool for their learning, with one resident stating, \"<i>I think Telegram is part of our residency.</i>\" Lack of consultation culture, fear of being judged, and hierarchy limited the number of teleconsultations and participation in educational discussions. Internet availability, digital divide, lack of physical exam, and privacy concerns were the main barriers to using Telegram for teleconsultations. Having international experts to answer consultations was viewed as a challenge and an advantage at the same time. It is a challenge when the international expert does not understand the culture or local resources. It is an advantage as the expert can introduce new updates and innovative interventions. A pediatrician said, \"<i>There are different groups of experts from here and from abroad as well…Yeah, that makes it an ideal thing.</i>\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telegram is already used by pediatric providers in Ethiopia for telemedicine and medical education. This affordable intervention can improve access and ease the burden of consultations for all providers while meeting current infrastructure. It has potential to be scaled up and regulated to improve pediatric telemedicine in Ethiopia and many LMIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-80
Harika Yarlagadda, Jomara Sandbulte, Edward Downs
Background: Reports show that in 2020 approximately 3.6 million live births were recorded in the United States, with an estimated 9-13% of these infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission due to complex medical needs. In the NICUs, where newborns require specialized attention, an interplay unfolds between parents and their infants. Within these sterile walls, each touch, each whispered word, carries significance, creating strong connections during medical treatments.
Methods: Our research seeks to examine the intricate relationship between parents and infants in the NICU through careful scientific investigation. Specifically, this paper serves as a foundational review of literature that highlights the importance of continuing research in this field.
Results: By examining existing studies, we aim to underscore the importance of attachment between mothers and infants, the necessity of evaluating their individual stress responses, and monitoring physiological changes. Also, we intend to better understand the mutual relationship between mother and child in the NICU setting.
Conclusions: Ultimately, by identifying specific interventions that can mitigate the emotional and physiological stresses experienced by both mothers and infants in the NICU, we aim to identify technological needs of the kangaroo care (KC) program and integrate these findings into routine care practices. We expect that this investigation insights will encourage more research on how to promote a more nurturing environment that supports the health and well-being of both mother and child during a NICU stay.
{"title":"Challenges and enhancement of health: a dual impact of kangaroo care on parents and infants-systematic review.","authors":"Harika Yarlagadda, Jomara Sandbulte, Edward Downs","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-80","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-80","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports show that in 2020 approximately 3.6 million live births were recorded in the United States, with an estimated 9-13% of these infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission due to complex medical needs. In the NICUs, where newborns require specialized attention, an interplay unfolds between parents and their infants. Within these sterile walls, each touch, each whispered word, carries significance, creating strong connections during medical treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our research seeks to examine the intricate relationship between parents and infants in the NICU through careful scientific investigation. Specifically, this paper serves as a foundational review of literature that highlights the importance of continuing research in this field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By examining existing studies, we aim to underscore the importance of attachment between mothers and infants, the necessity of evaluating their individual stress responses, and monitoring physiological changes. Also, we intend to better understand the mutual relationship between mother and child in the NICU setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultimately, by identifying specific interventions that can mitigate the emotional and physiological stresses experienced by both mothers and infants in the NICU, we aim to identify technological needs of the kangaroo care (KC) program and integrate these findings into routine care practices. We expect that this investigation insights will encourage more research on how to promote a more nurturing environment that supports the health and well-being of both mother and child during a NICU stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314710/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-27eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-84
Anne Chevalier McKechnie, Nellie Munn Swanson, Ratchada Jantraporn, Kristin M Elgersma, Taylor Iwaszko Wagner, Suhyun Park, Anna Trebilcock
Background: Parents learning about their children with medical complexity often use numerous health-related resources, including mobile health applications (mHealth apps). mHealth apps could provide broad access to key information and support, lower healthcare costs, and improve care. The quality of mHealth apps for this population has been a concern, but is currently unknown. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the quality of publicly available mHealth apps designed for parents who are preparing or caring for medically complex infants.
Methods: A systematic search strategy was applied to identify mHealth apps in the Apple and Google Play app stores in November 2022 and replicated in August 2024. Apps with no cost, in English, designed for parents of infants with perinatal medical complexity requiring hospitalization were included. Apps for healthy pregnancies, children >1 year, non-parental caregivers or healthcare professionals, primarily for tracking/monitoring, or unrelated activities/products were excluded. Independent raters used the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) subscales of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information to evaluate quality for each app. Mean ratings were calculated by subscale and for overall app quality.
Results: From 1,917 identified apps, 32 apps were downloaded and fully screened. The final sample of 15 unique apps were available on the Apple App Store, with six also available on the Google Play Store. Most apps focused on prematurity (n=6), followed by the neonatal intensive care experience (n=4), congenital heart disease (n=4), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n=1). MARS ratings of the overall sample (mean =3.61, median =3.58; range, 2.65-4.68) indicated 20% (3/15) were of good quality and 67% (10/15) were of acceptable quality. Apps showed strengths in Functionality and Information and performed worst in Engagement.
Conclusions: The poorest quality found in Engagement suggests that most of these apps do not effectively target users' interests or needs. Notably, many suffered from a lack of recent updates or became unavailable. This decline appears to parallel the increasing integration of digital health technologies within healthcare systems, which could prompt testing of mHealth apps on health outcomes. High-quality mHealth apps that are valued by parents and offer evidence-based information and support are needed to extend care.
背景:父母在了解孩子的医疗复杂性时,经常使用大量与健康相关的资源,包括移动健康应用程序(mHealth apps)。移动医疗应用程序可以提供对关键信息和支持的广泛访问,降低医疗成本,并改善护理。针对这一人群的移动医疗应用程序的质量一直是一个问题,但目前尚不清楚。本系统综述的目的是识别和评估为准备或照顾医疗复杂婴儿的父母设计的公开可用移动健康应用程序的质量。方法:采用系统搜索策略识别2022年11月苹果和b谷歌Play应用商店中的移动健康应用程序,并在2024年8月进行复制。其中包括为围产期医疗复杂、需要住院治疗的婴儿的父母设计的免费英文应用程序。排除了用于健康孕妇、1 - 10岁儿童、非父母照顾者或医疗保健专业人员(主要用于跟踪/监测)或不相关活动/产品的应用程序。独立评分者使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)的粘性、功能、美学和信息子量表来评估每个应用的质量。平均评分是根据子量表和整体应用质量计算的。结果:从1,917个确定的应用程序中,有32个应用程序被下载并进行了全面筛选。最终的15款独特应用出现在苹果App Store中,其中6款也出现在bb0 Play Store中。大多数应用程序关注早产(n=6),其次是新生儿重症监护经历(n=4),先天性心脏病(n=4)和缺氧缺血性脑病(n=1)。总体样本的MARS评分(平均值=3.61,中位数=3.58;范围2.65-4.68)表明20%(3/15)质量良好,67%(10/15)质量可接受。应用程序在功能和信息方面表现出色,在用户粘性方面表现最差。结论:用户粘性的低质量表明,大多数应用并没有有效地瞄准用户的兴趣或需求。值得注意的是,许多应用缺乏最新更新或无法使用。这种下降似乎与医疗保健系统中数字医疗技术的日益整合并行,这可能促使对移动医疗应用程序的健康结果进行测试。高质量的移动医疗应用程序需要得到父母的重视,并提供基于证据的信息和支持,以扩大护理。
{"title":"A systematic review and evaluation of mobile health apps designed for parents who are preparing or caring for medically complex infants.","authors":"Anne Chevalier McKechnie, Nellie Munn Swanson, Ratchada Jantraporn, Kristin M Elgersma, Taylor Iwaszko Wagner, Suhyun Park, Anna Trebilcock","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-84","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-84","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents learning about their children with medical complexity often use numerous health-related resources, including mobile health applications (mHealth apps). mHealth apps could provide broad access to key information and support, lower healthcare costs, and improve care. The quality of mHealth apps for this population has been a concern, but is currently unknown. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the quality of publicly available mHealth apps designed for parents who are preparing or caring for medically complex infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search strategy was applied to identify mHealth apps in the Apple and Google Play app stores in November 2022 and replicated in August 2024. Apps with no cost, in English, designed for parents of infants with perinatal medical complexity requiring hospitalization were included. Apps for healthy pregnancies, children >1 year, non-parental caregivers or healthcare professionals, primarily for tracking/monitoring, or unrelated activities/products were excluded. Independent raters used the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) subscales of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information to evaluate quality for each app. Mean ratings were calculated by subscale and for overall app quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1,917 identified apps, 32 apps were downloaded and fully screened. The final sample of 15 unique apps were available on the Apple App Store, with six also available on the Google Play Store. Most apps focused on prematurity (n=6), followed by the neonatal intensive care experience (n=4), congenital heart disease (n=4), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n=1). MARS ratings of the overall sample (mean =3.61, median =3.58; range, 2.65-4.68) indicated 20% (3/15) were of good quality and 67% (10/15) were of acceptable quality. Apps showed strengths in Functionality and Information and performed worst in Engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The poorest quality found in Engagement suggests that most of these apps do not effectively target users' interests or needs. Notably, many suffered from a lack of recent updates or became unavailable. This decline appears to parallel the increasing integration of digital health technologies within healthcare systems, which could prompt testing of mHealth apps on health outcomes. High-quality mHealth apps that are valued by parents and offer evidence-based information and support are needed to extend care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-71
Yossef Alnasser, Nicole Grande, Fakeha Masood, Cadina Powell, Robert H Gilman
Background and objective: With the evolution of technology, the delivery modes of healthcare have been completely transformed. Since the first use of telemedicine in the late 20th century, it has continued to evolve with advancement of technology. Today, telemedicine does not need sophisticated equipment and expensive platforms. Using a singular device to offer a wide range of services is both desired and necessary to provide higher-quality care at greater quantities. The inclusion of smartphone-telemedicine in many high-income countries proves a plausible framework to build upon for inclusion in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The primary goal of this review is to analyze existing literature on smartphone-based telemedicine and assess the scalability of this form of care to provide both accessible and equal care for all.
Methods: This is a narrative review that analyzed English published literature in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar over the last 50 years.
Key content and findings: Smartphone-based telemedicine can be divided mainly to mHealth and teleconsultation. Both applications are proven cost-effective at different extents and can augment health in different capacities. While mHealth is more suitable for health behavior change, smartphone teleconsultations can be employed in direct patient care. Smartphones' applicability to different settings and flexibility make them ideal for telemedicine. This form of telemedicine might be more suitable for low-resource settings and LMIC due to compatibility with current infrastructure, ease of use, lower cost and high availability. However, ease of use comes with risk of overutilization and providers' burnout. Privacy, digital divide and health literacy are other barriers of accessing smartphone-based telemedicine. Growing smartphone penetration and technology advancement carry future potentials for scaling up smartphone telemedicine in LMIC to advance equity and equality. Still, policies and regulations need to be implemented to protect privacy while using smartphones for telemedicine.
Conclusions: Smartphone-based telemedicine is an applicable form of telemedicine for low-resource settings and LMIC. Not all mHealth applications are suitable for LMIC, but investing in smartphone-based telemedicine for teleconsultation can save lives and lower the cost of care to reach everyone efficiently without a huge burden in a cost-effective manner for many LMIC.
{"title":"Be smart and use smartphones for telemedicine: narrative review.","authors":"Yossef Alnasser, Nicole Grande, Fakeha Masood, Cadina Powell, Robert H Gilman","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-71","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-71","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>With the evolution of technology, the delivery modes of healthcare have been completely transformed. Since the first use of telemedicine in the late 20th century, it has continued to evolve with advancement of technology. Today, telemedicine does not need sophisticated equipment and expensive platforms. Using a singular device to offer a wide range of services is both desired and necessary to provide higher-quality care at greater quantities. The inclusion of smartphone-telemedicine in many high-income countries proves a plausible framework to build upon for inclusion in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The primary goal of this review is to analyze existing literature on smartphone-based telemedicine and assess the scalability of this form of care to provide both accessible and equal care for all.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a narrative review that analyzed English published literature in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar over the last 50 years.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Smartphone-based telemedicine can be divided mainly to mHealth and teleconsultation. Both applications are proven cost-effective at different extents and can augment health in different capacities. While mHealth is more suitable for health behavior change, smartphone teleconsultations can be employed in direct patient care. Smartphones' applicability to different settings and flexibility make them ideal for telemedicine. This form of telemedicine might be more suitable for low-resource settings and LMIC due to compatibility with current infrastructure, ease of use, lower cost and high availability. However, ease of use comes with risk of overutilization and providers' burnout. Privacy, digital divide and health literacy are other barriers of accessing smartphone-based telemedicine. Growing smartphone penetration and technology advancement carry future potentials for scaling up smartphone telemedicine in LMIC to advance equity and equality. Still, policies and regulations need to be implemented to protect privacy while using smartphones for telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone-based telemedicine is an applicable form of telemedicine for low-resource settings and LMIC. Not all mHealth applications are suitable for LMIC, but investing in smartphone-based telemedicine for teleconsultation can save lives and lower the cost of care to reach everyone efficiently without a huge burden in a cost-effective manner for many LMIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-66
Tamara Vagg, Sarah Twohig, Kevin F Deasy, Hisham I S Ibrahim, Barry J Plant
Background and objective: With the increased adoption of digital health solutions, such as telehealth, there is a need to consider current practices and considerations towards digital health Literacy. The objective of this review is to explore what digital health literacy considerations have been detailed in cystic fibrosis telehealth papers.
Methods: The found papers published from a recent systematic review exploring telehealth within cystic fibrosis care were taken and analysed. These papers were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and included any paper written in English up to May 2021. Data pertaining to Health Literacy, Digital Literacy/Competency, Digital Health Literacy, Training, Readiness Assessments, and Sustained Use were extrapolated using Elicit AI Research Assistant 2024.
Key content and findings: From the 26 papers, the data of interest was sparse and mostly unavailable for this review. This may be due to several reasons; however the implication of this mitigation is discussed with reference to the digital divide, health in-equalities, and safety.
Conclusions: This review highlights that a structured approach to assess digital health literacy of care teams and people with cystic fibrosis is critical to the future success of safe telehealth use, and other digital health solutions.
背景和目标:随着越来越多地采用数字保健解决方案,如远程保健,有必要考虑目前的做法和对数字保健素养的考虑。本综述的目的是探讨在囊性纤维化远程医疗论文中详细介绍的数字健康素养考虑因素。方法:对最近发表的一篇探讨囊性纤维化远程医疗护理的系统综述所发现的论文进行分析。这些论文来自PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,包括截至2021年5月的所有英文论文。有关健康素养、数字素养/能力、数字健康素养、培训、准备评估和持续使用的数据使用Elicit AI Research Assistant 2024进行外推。主要内容和发现:从26篇论文中,感兴趣的数据很少,并且大多数无法用于本综述。这可能是由于几个原因;不过,本文还就数字鸿沟、健康不平等和安全问题讨论了这种缓解的影响。结论:本综述强调,采用结构化方法评估护理团队和囊性纤维化患者的数字健康素养,对于安全远程医疗使用和其他数字健康解决方案的未来成功至关重要。
{"title":"A narrative review of digital health literacy within cystic fibrosis telehealth: are we considering it?","authors":"Tamara Vagg, Sarah Twohig, Kevin F Deasy, Hisham I S Ibrahim, Barry J Plant","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-66","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-66","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>With the increased adoption of digital health solutions, such as telehealth, there is a need to consider current practices and considerations towards digital health Literacy. The objective of this review is to explore what digital health literacy considerations have been detailed in cystic fibrosis telehealth papers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The found papers published from a recent systematic review exploring telehealth within cystic fibrosis care were taken and analysed. These papers were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and included any paper written in English up to May 2021. Data pertaining to Health Literacy, Digital Literacy/Competency, Digital Health Literacy, Training, Readiness Assessments, and Sustained Use were extrapolated using Elicit AI Research Assistant 2024.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>From the 26 papers, the data of interest was sparse and mostly unavailable for this review. This may be due to several reasons; however the implication of this mitigation is discussed with reference to the digital divide, health in-equalities, and safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights that a structured approach to assess digital health literacy of care teams and people with cystic fibrosis is critical to the future success of safe telehealth use, and other digital health solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004305/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144061647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-39
Nicholas J Carson, Dharma E Cortés, Peyton Williams, Varshini Odayar, Lecsy Gonzalez, Eric Schlossberg, Lily Xie, Katie E Holmes, Michelle D Holmes, David R Williams, Todd G Reid
Background: Youth from racial and ethnic minoritized groups have experienced an increase in suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in recent years. Mobile health technology (mHealth) and digital phenotyping hold promise as means to measure STBs and related risk factors in these groups. Such tools are more likely to be successful when designed with input from the youth and caregivers who will use the technology. This study aimed to refine a digital phenotyping smartphone application, GeoMood, customized to measure STBs and relevant risk factors, such as family conflict and experiences of discrimination. The app was designed to collect passive data from smartphones (e.g., location, phone usage), as well as short-response survey data via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to further understand digital phenotypes of STBs.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with five youths of color and five caregivers to obtain feedback and refine the smartphone application, GeoMood. The ultimate goal of the interviews was to assess the app's potential acceptability from the two sets of users for whom the app was developed. Both youth and caregivers reviewed the youth version, which differs from the caregiver version content by the inclusion of items addressing suicidal behavior. Interviews were analyzed using a qualitative manifest analytic approach.
Results: Youth found the app to be an acceptable tool for measuring STBs. Caregivers were concerned about assessing self-injury explicitly.
Conclusions: Youth and caregiver feedback confirms openness by participating youth to using mHealth tools for measurement of STBs, but caregivers experience hesitation with the direct questions of such tools. Feedback was useful in refining the mobile tool and suggests multimodal assessment (text and emoji prompts) may appeal to users. Results from this study may improve the acceptability of future apps designed to measure and address disparities among particularly vulnerable groups of youth.
{"title":"Refining a digital phenotyping app for measurement of suicidal behavior among minoritized youth and caregivers in a community health system.","authors":"Nicholas J Carson, Dharma E Cortés, Peyton Williams, Varshini Odayar, Lecsy Gonzalez, Eric Schlossberg, Lily Xie, Katie E Holmes, Michelle D Holmes, David R Williams, Todd G Reid","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-39","DOIUrl":"10.21037/mhealth-24-39","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth from racial and ethnic minoritized groups have experienced an increase in suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in recent years. Mobile health technology (mHealth) and digital phenotyping hold promise as means to measure STBs and related risk factors in these groups. Such tools are more likely to be successful when designed with input from the youth and caregivers who will use the technology. This study aimed to refine a digital phenotyping smartphone application, GeoMood, customized to measure STBs and relevant risk factors, such as family conflict and experiences of discrimination. The app was designed to collect passive data from smartphones (e.g., location, phone usage), as well as short-response survey data via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to further understand digital phenotypes of STBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with five youths of color and five caregivers to obtain feedback and refine the smartphone application, GeoMood. The ultimate goal of the interviews was to assess the app's potential acceptability from the two sets of users for whom the app was developed. Both youth and caregivers reviewed the youth version, which differs from the caregiver version content by the inclusion of items addressing suicidal behavior. Interviews were analyzed using a qualitative manifest analytic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth found the app to be an acceptable tool for measuring STBs. Caregivers were concerned about assessing self-injury explicitly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Youth and caregiver feedback confirms openness by participating youth to using mHealth tools for measurement of STBs, but caregivers experience hesitation with the direct questions of such tools. Feedback was useful in refining the mobile tool and suggests multimodal assessment (text and emoji prompts) may appeal to users. Results from this study may improve the acceptability of future apps designed to measure and address disparities among particularly vulnerable groups of youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004319/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144045841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-69
Valerie Yelverton, Jan Ostermann, Michael E Yarrington, Yuliya V Lokhnygina, Andrew K Weinhold, Nathan M Thielman
While telehealth was widely used to provide human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, research evaluating viral suppression by visit type is conflicting. This study assessed variation in viral load (VL) testing and outcomes by visit type for routine HIV care visits among people living with HIV (PWH) at a large academic health center in central North Carolina (NC). Electronic health records (EHRs) data from the Duke University Infectious Disease (ID) Clinic in NC were extracted in aggregated form. Pearson's Chi-square (χ2) tests were used to examine variation in VL testing and virologic suppression (VS) in 2022 by visit type patterns in the first year of the pandemic. Tipping point (TP) sensitivity analyses were conducted. EHR data from 1,835 PWH were included. Between March 16, 2020 and March 15, 2021, 53% of PWH received in-person HIV care only, 32% received a combination of telehealth and in-person care, and 15% received telehealth care only. About 20% of PWH did not have any VL test recorded in 2022. Among PWH with a VL test, 90% were virologically suppressed at all tests in 2022. Visit type was significantly associated with VL testing (P<0.001). The proportion of people who had no VL test in 2022 was larger among telehealth only users (31%) as compared to in-person only or PWH who received a combination (19% and 18%, respectively). VS in 2022 did not differ by visit type pattern in the first year of the pandemic (P=0.36) among PWH with a VL test in 2022. TP analyses identified that the proportion of unsuppressed VL tests among PWH without any VL test in 2022 would need to be multiplied by 2.1 to result in a statistically significant difference in VS by visit type (P=0.045). Our findings indicate that VL outcomes among telehealth users who had VL testing results documented in EHR at least one year later did not differ from in-person HIV care users. However, VL testing uptake was lower among telehealth only users suggesting the need for strategies such as remote VL testing to ensure regular VL testing among PWH who use telehealth HIV care.
{"title":"Variation in subsequent viral load testing and outcomes by visit type patterns in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic at a large academic medical center in North Carolina.","authors":"Valerie Yelverton, Jan Ostermann, Michael E Yarrington, Yuliya V Lokhnygina, Andrew K Weinhold, Nathan M Thielman","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-69","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-69","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While telehealth was widely used to provide human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, research evaluating viral suppression by visit type is conflicting. This study assessed variation in viral load (VL) testing and outcomes by visit type for routine HIV care visits among people living with HIV (PWH) at a large academic health center in central North Carolina (NC). Electronic health records (EHRs) data from the Duke University Infectious Disease (ID) Clinic in NC were extracted in aggregated form. Pearson's Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) tests were used to examine variation in VL testing and virologic suppression (VS) in 2022 by visit type patterns in the first year of the pandemic. Tipping point (TP) sensitivity analyses were conducted. EHR data from 1,835 PWH were included. Between March 16, 2020 and March 15, 2021, 53% of PWH received in-person HIV care only, 32% received a combination of telehealth and in-person care, and 15% received telehealth care only. About 20% of PWH did not have any VL test recorded in 2022. Among PWH with a VL test, 90% were virologically suppressed at all tests in 2022. Visit type was significantly associated with VL testing (P<0.001). The proportion of people who had no VL test in 2022 was larger among telehealth only users (31%) as compared to in-person only or PWH who received a combination (19% and 18%, respectively). VS in 2022 did not differ by visit type pattern in the first year of the pandemic (P=0.36) among PWH with a VL test in 2022. TP analyses identified that the proportion of unsuppressed VL tests among PWH without any VL test in 2022 would need to be multiplied by 2.1 to result in a statistically significant difference in VS by visit type (P=0.045). Our findings indicate that VL outcomes among telehealth users who had VL testing results documented in EHR at least one year later did not differ from in-person HIV care users. However, VL testing uptake was lower among telehealth only users suggesting the need for strategies such as remote VL testing to ensure regular VL testing among PWH who use telehealth HIV care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-62
Charlie R Ottinger, Raad H Gheith, Matthew H Sharp, Justine M Davis, Ryan P Lowery, Jacob M Wilson
Background: Numerous mobile phone applications have been developed with the goal of producing behavior changes that lead to weight loss and enhanced health. However, the evidence basis for these applications is often lacking, which renders them ineffective for altering health behaviors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefits of a novel mobile application, The FASTer Way to Fat Loss® (FW).
Methods: Forty-two overweight, but otherwise healthy women were recruited for this parallel study and randomly assigned to an exercise and nutrition education only control (CON, n=21) or an integrated mobile application group (FW, n=21), which included exercise training and dietary modifications that were overseen by an individually assigned coach. Both groups were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention for body composition, blood health indices, and multiple questionnaires for self-esteem and body image. Absolute mean differences within and between groups were measured using unpaired t-tests with statistical significance set at P<0.05.
Results: Compared to the CON group (0.56±1.54 kg), the FW group significantly reduced total mass (-1.21±1.82 kg; P=0.002), fat mass (0.42±1.38 vs. -1.45±1.23 kg; P<0.001), body fat percentage (0.23%±1.33% vs. -1.24%±1.32%; P=0.001), and body mass index (0.24±0.59 vs. -0.46±0.60 kg/m2; P<0.001); whereas no significant between-group differences were detected for lean body mass (P=0.86). Additionally, total cholesterol was significantly reduced in the FW group (-5.2±14.9 mg/dL) compared to the CON group (8.7±22.8 mg/dL; P=0.03). There were no other significant between-group differences in blood lipid profiles, blood health indices, or subjective measures of self-esteem and body image.
Conclusions: An integrated, multifactorial smartphone application (FASTer Way®) elicited positive changes in body composition and total cholesterol in six-weeks. Future research should investigate these effects in other populations to better generalize these results.
背景:许多手机应用程序已经开发出来,其目标是产生导致减肥和增强健康的行为改变。然而,这些应用的证据基础往往缺乏,这使得它们对改变健康行为无效。因此,本研究的目的是研究一种新型移动应用程序的潜在好处,即更快的减肥方法®(FW)。方法:在这项平行研究中招募了42名超重但其他方面健康的女性,并随机分配到仅进行运动和营养教育的对照组(CON, n=21)或综合移动应用组(FW, n=21),其中包括运动训练和饮食调整,由单独指定的教练监督。在基线和干预后6周对两组进行身体成分、血液健康指数以及自尊和身体形象的多项问卷调查。采用非配对t检验测量组内和组间的绝对平均差异,结果:与CON组(0.56±1.54 kg)相比,FW组显著降低了总质量(-1.21±1.82 kg);P=0.002),脂肪质量(0.42±1.38 vs -1.45±1.23 kg);pv。-1.24%±1.32%;P=0.001),体重指数(0.24±0.59 vs. -0.46±0.60 kg/m2;结论:一个集成的、多因素的智能手机应用程序(FASTer Way®)在6周内引起了身体成分和总胆固醇的积极变化。未来的研究应该在其他人群中调查这些影响,以更好地推广这些结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05813548。
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a mobile application-based lifestyle change program (FASTer Way) on body composition, biochemical and hematological health markers, body image, and self-esteem in overweight women.","authors":"Charlie R Ottinger, Raad H Gheith, Matthew H Sharp, Justine M Davis, Ryan P Lowery, Jacob M Wilson","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-62","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-62","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous mobile phone applications have been developed with the goal of producing behavior changes that lead to weight loss and enhanced health. However, the evidence basis for these applications is often lacking, which renders them ineffective for altering health behaviors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefits of a novel mobile application, The FASTer Way to Fat Loss<sup>®</sup> (FW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two overweight, but otherwise healthy women were recruited for this parallel study and randomly assigned to an exercise and nutrition education only control (CON, n=21) or an integrated mobile application group (FW, n=21), which included exercise training and dietary modifications that were overseen by an individually assigned coach. Both groups were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention for body composition, blood health indices, and multiple questionnaires for self-esteem and body image. Absolute mean differences within and between groups were measured using unpaired <i>t</i>-tests with statistical significance set at P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the CON group (0.56±1.54 kg), the FW group significantly reduced total mass (-1.21±1.82 kg; P=0.002), fat mass (0.42±1.38 <i>vs</i>. -1.45±1.23 kg; P<0.001), body fat percentage (0.23%±1.33% <i>vs</i>. -1.24%±1.32%; P=0.001), and body mass index (0.24±0.59 <i>vs</i>. -0.46±0.60 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; P<0.001); whereas no significant between-group differences were detected for lean body mass (P=0.86). Additionally, total cholesterol was significantly reduced in the FW group (-5.2±14.9 mg/dL) compared to the CON group (8.7±22.8 mg/dL; P=0.03). There were no other significant between-group differences in blood lipid profiles, blood health indices, or subjective measures of self-esteem and body image.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An integrated, multifactorial smartphone application (FASTer Way<sup>®</sup>) elicited positive changes in body composition and total cholesterol in six-weeks. Future research should investigate these effects in other populations to better generalize these results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05813548.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004307/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}