Otology & neurotology open最新文献

Objective: To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement.

Study design: Retrospective image analysis.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging.

Intervention: None.

Main outcome measure: Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures.

Results: Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients.

Conclusions: This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.

Objective: To evaluate for equivalence in postoperative changes of speech recognition scores in a veteran patient population undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) compared to matched nonveteran patients.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: A total of 83 veteran patients who underwent CI at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA cohort) were matched to 83 nonveteran patients from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-secure, Encrypted, Research, Management and Evaluation Solution database (HERMES cohort) based on age, sex, and baseline Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) scores.

Intervention: Patients underwent CI.

Main outcome measures: Comparison of postoperative CNC and Arizona Biomedical Institute recognition scores.

Results: The mean difference and lower confidence interval of CNC scores between matched Veterans Affairs and HERMES cohorts were within a -ΔNI boundary of -15% at the 3-month (mean = 6.15, lower confidence interval = -2.38), 6-month (mean = 7.36, lower confidence interval = -2.21), and 12-month (mean = 4.03, lower confidence interval = -4.88) postoperative time points. The mean difference and lower confidence interval of Arizona Biomedical Institute scores between cohorts were within the -ΔNI boundary of -30% at 3 months (mean = 1, lower confidence interval = -8.71), 6 months (mean = 0.31, lower confidence interval = -12.30), and 12 months (mean = 0.72, lower confidence interval = -10.48).

Conclusion: Our veteran population demonstrated improvements in speech recognition scores after CI comparable to a matched nonveteran population. Although veterans face unique factors that affect their hearing, access to medical care, and baseline general health, these findings affirm appropriate veteran candidates should be offered CI.

Clinics are treating a growing number of patients with greater amounts of residual hearing. These patients often benefit from a bimodal hearing configuration in which acoustic input from a hearing aid on 1 ear is combined with electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant on the other ear. The current guidelines aim to review the literature and provide best practice recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who may benefit from bimodal hearing configurations. Specifically, the guidelines review: benefits of bimodal listening, preoperative and postoperative cochlear implant evaluation and programming, bimodal hearing aid fitting, contralateral routing of signal considerations, bimodal treatment for tinnitus, and aural rehabilitation recommendations.