Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1313
Amarjeet Kumar, C. Sinha, Ajeet Kumar, P. Kumari
{"title":"Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Pregnancy: What An Anesthesiologist Needs to Know","authors":"Amarjeet Kumar, C. Sinha, Ajeet Kumar, P. Kumari","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"94 1","pages":"51-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74039500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1314
J. P. Fernández, Carolina C Brofman, M. Ferrante, Agustín Algieri, R. D. Algieri
Introducción: El acceso vascular intraóseo se considera una opción rápida, segura y eficaz en situaciones en las que no es posible lograr el acceso venoso en un tiempo preestablecido, como ocurre en el shock grave o paro car-diorrespiratorio. En estas situaciones resulta dificultosa la colocación de accesos vasculares convenciona-les, por lo que es de suma importancia la adquisición de conocimientos relacionados con la colocación de accesos intraóseos. Metodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal. Encuestas al personal de la salud y profesionales en formación sobre co-nocimientos del acceso vascular intraoseo y su utilización en las situaciones de emergencias Y urgencias Resultados: Se realizaron 444 encuestas. Médicos con formación 37 (8.3%) médicos residentes 23 (5.1%), estudiantes de medicina 206 (46.39%), enfermeros 92 (20.72%) y estudiantes de enfermería 86 (19.36%). El rango eta-rio fue de 21–59 años. 27.03% (120) conoce la vía intraósea como acceso vascular; 25% (111) han recibido algún tipo de formación acerca de la colocación de accesos intraóseos, siendo la misma cantidad de profe-sionales los que pudieron enumerar los sitios anatómicos correspondientes. Sólo un 13.06% (58) pudieron indicar precisamente los reparos anatómicos necesarios para su colocación y, por último, únicamente 23.42% (104) de los encuestados conocía si su lugar de desempeño disponía de sets para la colocación de dicha vía. Conclusione: Pocos profesionales de la salud poseen conocimientos relacionados con la colocación de accesos intra-óseos ya que son escasamente promovidos Durante la formación de grado. El acceso vascular intraoseo es una alternativa altamente utilizable y su entrenamiento puede ser implementado en los distintos niveles de formación siendo primordial la capacitación acerca de sus indicaciones, contraindicaciones, complicaciones y forma de colocación. Con el entrenamiento adecuado el acceso vascular intraoseo puede ser utilizado como herramienta en los servicios de urgencias para el tratamiento inicial de pacientes con dificultados para la colocación de accesos vasculares Palabras claves: Trauma, Acceso vascular, Capacitacion continua, Emergência, Educación en cirugía de cuidados agudos, Urgencias, Anatomia quirurgica.
{"title":"Análisis y Determinación Del Conocimiento Anatomoquirurgico de Los Profesionales de La Salud Para La Realización de Acceso Vascular Intraoseo en La Urgencia","authors":"J. P. Fernández, Carolina C Brofman, M. Ferrante, Agustín Algieri, R. D. Algieri","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1314","url":null,"abstract":"Introducción: El acceso vascular intraóseo se considera una opción rápida, segura y eficaz en situaciones en las que no es posible lograr el acceso venoso en un tiempo preestablecido, como ocurre en el shock grave o paro car-diorrespiratorio. En estas situaciones resulta dificultosa la colocación de accesos vasculares convenciona-les, por lo que es de suma importancia la adquisición de conocimientos relacionados con la colocación de accesos intraóseos. Metodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal. Encuestas al personal de la salud y profesionales en formación sobre co-nocimientos del acceso vascular intraoseo y su utilización en las situaciones de emergencias Y urgencias Resultados: Se realizaron 444 encuestas. Médicos con formación 37 (8.3%) médicos residentes 23 (5.1%), estudiantes de medicina 206 (46.39%), enfermeros 92 (20.72%) y estudiantes de enfermería 86 (19.36%). El rango eta-rio fue de 21–59 años. 27.03% (120) conoce la vía intraósea como acceso vascular; 25% (111) han recibido algún tipo de formación acerca de la colocación de accesos intraóseos, siendo la misma cantidad de profe-sionales los que pudieron enumerar los sitios anatómicos correspondientes. Sólo un 13.06% (58) pudieron indicar precisamente los reparos anatómicos necesarios para su colocación y, por último, únicamente 23.42% (104) de los encuestados conocía si su lugar de desempeño disponía de sets para la colocación de dicha vía. Conclusione: Pocos profesionales de la salud poseen conocimientos relacionados con la colocación de accesos intra-óseos ya que son escasamente promovidos Durante la formación de grado. El acceso vascular intraoseo es una alternativa altamente utilizable y su entrenamiento puede ser implementado en los distintos niveles de formación siendo primordial la capacitación acerca de sus indicaciones, contraindicaciones, complicaciones y forma de colocación. Con el entrenamiento adecuado el acceso vascular intraoseo puede ser utilizado como herramienta en los servicios de urgencias para el tratamiento inicial de pacientes con dificultados para la colocación de accesos vasculares Palabras claves: Trauma, Acceso vascular, Capacitacion continua, Emergência, Educación en cirugía de cuidados agudos, Urgencias, Anatomia quirurgica.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74355904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-04-01DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1305
Maria F Jimenez, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo, Danny Conde, Alex Arroyo, Milcíades Ibánez-Pinilla, Felipe Borda, Daniel Colmenares, Juan C Puyana
Introduction: The capacity for prompt "rescue" from death in patients with complications has become an important marker of the quality of care since mortality and morbidity have been identified as incongruous indicators. This study aims to describe the incidence of "surgical rescue" failure and the outcomes of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients at a large academic medical center.
Materials and methods: In our high-volume surgical hospital, an electronic EGS registry was developed to automatically capture in-hospital information and outcomes from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Surgical complications were included in an online application and automatically captured in the electronic EGS registry, and prospectively screened from June to July 2017 for acute EGS surgical patients from operative procedures.
Results: A total of 501 patients (average age: 53.9 ± 20.9, 56.5% female) underwent 882 EGS procedures. Thirteen patients (2.6%) of the 501 patients required "surgical rescue", mainly for uncontrolled sepsis (43%) and anastomotic leakage (30%). The surgical rescue failure rate (inability to prevent death after a surgical complication) was 15.4%. Patients requiring critical care (OR = 3.3, IC 95%: 1.04, 10.5), hospital admission (p = 0.038), and hospital LOS (days) (p = 0.004) were significantly higher for the surgical rescue patients than for those without complications.
Conclusion: Surgical failure to rescue rate was similar among high-volume EGS services, as has recently been described in the United States. The latest development and implementation of an electronic automatic captured EGS registry database in our academic medical center will serve to build best practices for "surgical rescue" and drive quality improvement programs.
{"title":"Surgical Rescue in a High-volume Urban Emergency General Surgery Service at a Middle-income Country.","authors":"Maria F Jimenez, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo, Danny Conde, Alex Arroyo, Milcíades Ibánez-Pinilla, Felipe Borda, Daniel Colmenares, Juan C Puyana","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The capacity for prompt \"rescue\" from death in patients with complications has become an important marker of the quality of care since mortality and morbidity have been identified as incongruous indicators. This study aims to describe the incidence of \"surgical rescue\" failure and the outcomes of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients at a large academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our high-volume surgical hospital, an electronic EGS registry was developed to automatically capture in-hospital information and outcomes from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Surgical complications were included in an online application and automatically captured in the electronic EGS registry, and prospectively screened from June to July 2017 for acute EGS surgical patients from operative procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 501 patients (average age: 53.9 ± 20.9, 56.5% female) underwent 882 EGS procedures. Thirteen patients (2.6%) of the 501 patients required \"surgical rescue\", mainly for uncontrolled sepsis (43%) and anastomotic leakage (30%). The surgical rescue failure rate (inability to prevent death after a surgical complication) was 15.4%. Patients requiring critical care (OR = 3.3, IC 95%: 1.04, 10.5), hospital admission (<i>p</i> = 0.038), and hospital LOS (days) (<i>p</i> = 0.004) were significantly higher for the surgical rescue patients than for those without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical failure to rescue rate was similar among high-volume EGS services, as has recently been described in the United States. The latest development and implementation of an electronic automatic captured EGS registry database in our academic medical center will serve to build best practices for \"surgical rescue\" and drive quality improvement programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"16-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/8e/nihms-1815153.PMC9529028.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33487376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1281
J. Duchesne, D. Tatum, E. Toraih, M. Hussein
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), commonly known as COVID-19, has resulted in severe resource shortages in the areas that have become hot spots. A leading area of concern has been hospital bed and intensive care unit bed availability that would leave hospitals unable to treat the most severe cases and which would result in unnecessary additional loss of life. Here, we present a model based on prediction of cases by state to propose resource allocation to alleviate hospital bed shortages.
{"title":"Development of an Inclusive Interhospital Resource Allocation to Mitigate States Hospital Capacity during COVID-19","authors":"J. Duchesne, D. Tatum, E. Toraih, M. Hussein","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1281","url":null,"abstract":"The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), commonly known as COVID-19, has resulted in severe resource shortages in the areas that have become hot spots. A leading area of concern has been hospital bed and intensive care unit bed availability that would leave hospitals unable to treat the most severe cases and which would result in unnecessary additional loss of life. Here, we present a model based on prediction of cases by state to propose resource allocation to alleviate hospital bed shortages.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"128 1","pages":"147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88106414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1276
S. Rizoli, G. Fraga, Bartolomeu Nascimento, Lorena T de Melo Rolim
Our planet is experiencing an unprecedented public health crisis. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is ubiquitously making headlines daily. Currently, 216 countries, areas, or territories have documented COVID-19 cases. Many are publicizing numbers of deaths per population by country as a measure of a “country’s performance” in handling this global crisis. Indeed, death ranks are being created to ascertain a “nation’s failure or success.” Due to the pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) has made available daily data on COVID-19 cases and mortality.1 This is extremely valuable to inform countries on the spread of the disease and its lethality. This information can guide pandemic preparedness plans across the globe. However, caution should be exercised when using such data for unadjusted cross-country comparisons, particularly on disease lethality. Increasing death rates are naturally observed as an epidemic takes its course. The epidemic curve is a visual display of outbreak cases.2 It starts with the first confirmed case in a population. Then, it develops as an expression mainly of the incubation period, mode of transmission, and transmissibility. The number of cases and associated deaths of a disease grow exponentially on its epidemic curve. The goal of this brief analysis is to demonstrate that mortality rates are modifiable when considering the pandemic phase of each country. In order to adjust for the epidemic curve of COVID19 in countries with higher numbers of deaths according to the WHO available data, we calculated the time elapsed between the first reported case and May 16, 2020. All countries included had a minimum of 80 days into their epidemic curve. The Netherlands had the shortest epidemic curve with 80 days. Then, this was used as the reference epidemic curve for cross-country comparison. We also reported mortality rates per 1,000,000 inhabitants. On the WHO online dashboard, the absolute number of new deaths by country is reported daily as well as the number of cumulative deaths over the pandemic period. We included the top 10 countries with the highest cumulative numbers of deaths listed by the WHO on May 16, 2020. With 118 pandemic days, the United States had the highest absolute number of deaths for the period. Among the top 10 countries, the Netherlands reported the lowest absolute number of deaths (Table 1). However, considering the country population, the U.S. mortality dropped to 7° place and Brazil had the lowest mortality rate on the rank of all countries analyzed (Table 1). When accounting for the epidemic curve, we observed additional changes on the rank of countries by mortality rates (Table 2). Interestingly, the United States had the lowest mortality rate of all countries included. Belgium appeared as the country with the highest death rate among the top 10 countries. In this new scenario, the United States had a mortality rate of approximately 14 times lower than the one seen for Belgium. Brazil, the only South
我们的星球正在经历一场前所未有的公共卫生危机。持续的COVID-19大流行每天都在成为头条新闻。目前,有216个国家、地区或领土记录了COVID-19病例。许多国家正在公布按国家分列的人均死亡人数,作为衡量一个国家在处理这一全球危机方面“表现”的标准。实际上,设立死亡等级是为了确定一个“国家的成败”。由于大流行,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)每天都提供COVID-19病例和死亡率的数据这对于向各国通报该疾病的传播及其致命性非常有价值。这些信息可以指导全球的大流行防范计划。然而,在使用此类数据进行未经调整的跨国比较时,特别是在疾病致死率方面,应谨慎进行。随着流行病的发展,死亡率自然会上升。流行曲线是爆发病例的直观显示它从人群中的第一例确诊病例开始。然后,它主要表现为潜伏期、传播方式和传播能力。一种疾病的病例数和相关死亡人数在其流行曲线上呈指数增长。这一简要分析的目的是证明,在考虑到每个国家的大流行阶段时,死亡率是可以改变的。为了根据世卫组织现有数据调整covid - 19在死亡人数较高的国家的流行曲线,我们计算了从第一例报告病例到2020年5月16日之间的时间。所列所有国家的流行曲线至少有80天。荷兰的流行曲线最短,为80天。并以此为参考流行曲线进行跨国比较。我们还报告了每100万居民的死亡率。在世卫组织在线仪表板上,每天报告各国新增死亡人数的绝对数字以及大流行期间的累计死亡人数。我们纳入了世界卫生组织在2020年5月16日列出的累计死亡人数最多的前10个国家。在118天的大流行期间,美国的绝对死亡人数最多。在排名前10位的国家中,荷兰报告的绝对死亡人数最低(表1)。然而,考虑到国家人口,美国的死亡率下降到7位,巴西的死亡率在所有分析国家的排名中最低(表1)。当考虑到流行曲线时,我们观察到按死亡率排名的国家的其他变化(表2)。有趣的是,美国的死亡率在所有纳入的国家中最低。在前10个国家中,比利时的死亡率最高。在这种新的情况下,美国的死亡率比比利时低大约14倍。巴西是南美洲唯一一个死亡率最低的国家之一,仅高于美国和德国记录的死亡率。1巴西累西腓Getulio Vargas医院,巴西伯南布哥省累西腓,medicina,伯南布哥省伯累西腓,沙特伯南布迦医学院,巴西圣保罗,坎皮纳斯,Unicamp, Cirurgia科,巴西,卡塔尔,哈马德总医院Bartolomeu A NascimentoJr, gertulio Vargas医院,累西腓,巴西,电话:+558131845606,电子邮件:Barto.NascimentoJr@outlook.com本文引用方式:NascimentoJr BA, de Melo Rolim LT, Fraga GP,等。流行曲线对COVID-19死亡率跨国比较的重要性——对大流行数字的简要解读中华创伤急救外科杂志2020;XX(X): 1-2。支持来源:无利益冲突:无
{"title":"Importance of the Epidemic Curve for Cross-country Comparison of COVID-19 Mortality: A Brief Analysis on Interpreting the Pandemic Numbers","authors":"S. Rizoli, G. Fraga, Bartolomeu Nascimento, Lorena T de Melo Rolim","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1276","url":null,"abstract":"Our planet is experiencing an unprecedented public health crisis. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is ubiquitously making headlines daily. Currently, 216 countries, areas, or territories have documented COVID-19 cases. Many are publicizing numbers of deaths per population by country as a measure of a “country’s performance” in handling this global crisis. Indeed, death ranks are being created to ascertain a “nation’s failure or success.” Due to the pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) has made available daily data on COVID-19 cases and mortality.1 This is extremely valuable to inform countries on the spread of the disease and its lethality. This information can guide pandemic preparedness plans across the globe. However, caution should be exercised when using such data for unadjusted cross-country comparisons, particularly on disease lethality. Increasing death rates are naturally observed as an epidemic takes its course. The epidemic curve is a visual display of outbreak cases.2 It starts with the first confirmed case in a population. Then, it develops as an expression mainly of the incubation period, mode of transmission, and transmissibility. The number of cases and associated deaths of a disease grow exponentially on its epidemic curve. The goal of this brief analysis is to demonstrate that mortality rates are modifiable when considering the pandemic phase of each country. In order to adjust for the epidemic curve of COVID19 in countries with higher numbers of deaths according to the WHO available data, we calculated the time elapsed between the first reported case and May 16, 2020. All countries included had a minimum of 80 days into their epidemic curve. The Netherlands had the shortest epidemic curve with 80 days. Then, this was used as the reference epidemic curve for cross-country comparison. We also reported mortality rates per 1,000,000 inhabitants. On the WHO online dashboard, the absolute number of new deaths by country is reported daily as well as the number of cumulative deaths over the pandemic period. We included the top 10 countries with the highest cumulative numbers of deaths listed by the WHO on May 16, 2020. With 118 pandemic days, the United States had the highest absolute number of deaths for the period. Among the top 10 countries, the Netherlands reported the lowest absolute number of deaths (Table 1). However, considering the country population, the U.S. mortality dropped to 7° place and Brazil had the lowest mortality rate on the rank of all countries analyzed (Table 1). When accounting for the epidemic curve, we observed additional changes on the rank of countries by mortality rates (Table 2). Interestingly, the United States had the lowest mortality rate of all countries included. Belgium appeared as the country with the highest death rate among the top 10 countries. In this new scenario, the United States had a mortality rate of approximately 14 times lower than the one seen for Belgium. Brazil, the only South ","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"130 1","pages":"120-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74605658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"PTS Statement on Virtual Congress 2020","authors":"F. V. Rivera","doi":"10.5005/pajt-9-2-v","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/pajt-9-2-v","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"00-00"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90194906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1286
J. Salamea, J. Figueroa, C. Loyola, F. Martínez
Introduction: In Ecuador, as in other Latin American countries, trauma has become one of the main reasons to seek medical care in the country. According to data obtained from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INEC), the rate of homicides, car accidents, suicides, and burns, grouped together, represent the main cause of morbidity and mortality in people aged between 18 years and 40 years, surpassing mortality due to cardiovascular causes or diabetes. Additionally, one study on geolocation of calls made to the emergency services (SIS-ECU 9-1-1) indicated that trauma in the country is becoming more and more frequent in marginal urban and rural areas, where health services are scarce. Due to this emerging situation, it is necessary to evaluate the shortand long-term effectiveness of the Basic Trauma Course (BTC), a course designed to educate students, general practitioners, prehospital staff and primary healthcare physicians. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the BTC in family medicine residents who work in Health Centers in marginalurban and rural areas of the Azuay, Cañar, and Morona Santiago provinces in southern Ecuador. Materials and methods: Quasi-experimental study in which knowledge is evaluated at three stages in time (before the course, at the end of the course and one year later) in 39 family medicine residents. Comparison of means of the test scores was made using formulas in SPSS of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD. Results: ANOVA brought significant differences between measurements (F = 8.38, p value < 0.0005). The increase in the score between the pretest and the immediate posttest was significant (p value < 0.01). The difference between pretest and late posttest was not significant. The comparison of the immediate and late posttest results showed a decrease in the mean, being statistically significant (p value < 0.01). Conclusion: The BTC, as a unique training course, does not guarantee the permanence of long-term knowledge in participants who do not regularly attend to the trauma patient, requiring constant training using spaced repetition methods, for adequate consolidation.
{"title":"Efficacy of the Basic Trauma Course in Family Medicine Resident Physicians in Southern Ecuador: It is Time to Innovate Education in Trauma","authors":"J. Salamea, J. Figueroa, C. Loyola, F. Martínez","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1286","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In Ecuador, as in other Latin American countries, trauma has become one of the main reasons to seek medical care in the country. According to data obtained from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INEC), the rate of homicides, car accidents, suicides, and burns, grouped together, represent the main cause of morbidity and mortality in people aged between 18 years and 40 years, surpassing mortality due to cardiovascular causes or diabetes. Additionally, one study on geolocation of calls made to the emergency services (SIS-ECU 9-1-1) indicated that trauma in the country is becoming more and more frequent in marginal urban and rural areas, where health services are scarce. Due to this emerging situation, it is necessary to evaluate the shortand long-term effectiveness of the Basic Trauma Course (BTC), a course designed to educate students, general practitioners, prehospital staff and primary healthcare physicians. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the BTC in family medicine residents who work in Health Centers in marginalurban and rural areas of the Azuay, Cañar, and Morona Santiago provinces in southern Ecuador. Materials and methods: Quasi-experimental study in which knowledge is evaluated at three stages in time (before the course, at the end of the course and one year later) in 39 family medicine residents. Comparison of means of the test scores was made using formulas in SPSS of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD. Results: ANOVA brought significant differences between measurements (F = 8.38, p value < 0.0005). The increase in the score between the pretest and the immediate posttest was significant (p value < 0.01). The difference between pretest and late posttest was not significant. The comparison of the immediate and late posttest results showed a decrease in the mean, being statistically significant (p value < 0.01). Conclusion: The BTC, as a unique training course, does not guarantee the permanence of long-term knowledge in participants who do not regularly attend to the trauma patient, requiring constant training using spaced repetition methods, for adequate consolidation.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"3 1","pages":"97-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81966582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1287
Milena Alcázar, Maria del Pilar Gutierrez, Santiago Rojas, T. Suárez, Carlos H. Morales
Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous (IV) contrast is the method of choice for diagnosing and selecting treatments for surgical pathologies in patients visiting the emergency room (ER) for acute, nontraumatic abdominal pain. However, there are risks, high costs, and delays in medical attention associated with this modality. Studies have suggested performance of CT without venous contrast for diagnosing appendicitis. Nevertheless, no methodologically rigorous studies have evaluated CT without IV contrast performance when used as the main diagnostic tool for patients with acute abdominal pain. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of noncontrast abdominal CT and compare it with a reference standard (surgery/pathology or clinical follow-up) to detect surgical diseases in patients with acute abdominal pain. Design: This is a cross-sectional, diagnostic test study. Place: Hospital Universitario San Vicente Foundation (Medellín, Colombia). Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional convenience sample diagnostic test study of consecutively selected patients who underwent noncontrast CT of the abdomen. All patients were those who presented to the ER with abdominal complaints. All patients who consented underwent a noncontrast and IV contrast CT scans. Two radiologists with different levels of expertise independently evaluated the noncontrast tomography images to specify the diagnostic findings. Final diagnoses were collected independently from the patients’ clinical histories. Patients who did not undergo surgery, their clinical histories were reviewed during hospitalization. Those who were not hospitalized had their clinical course obtained by telephone 2 weeks after being discharged. Results: Of the 157 included patients, 19.1% underwent surgery because of an acute pathology. For noncontrast abdominal contrast tomography, values of 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 82.7–100), 96.8% specificity (95% CI 93.4–100), 87.5% PPV (95% CI 74.4–100), 98.4% NPV (95% CI 95.8–100), 29.6 LR+ (95% CI 11.24–78.1), 0.07 LR− (95% CI 0.02–0.26), and 97.4% diagnostic accuracy were obtained. The interobserver concordance had a kappa value of 0.88. Conclusion: Noncontrast abdominal CT performs well in differentiating medical vs surgical diseases in patients with acute abdominal pain.
简介:计算机断层扫描(CT)与静脉(IV)造影剂是选择的方法,诊断和选择的手术病理的患者访问急诊室(ER)急性,非创伤性腹痛治疗。然而,与这种方式相关的风险、高成本和医疗延误。研究表明,CT不加静脉造影诊断阑尾炎的表现。然而,尚无方法学上严谨的研究评估不加静脉造影剂的CT作为急性腹痛患者的主要诊断工具。目的:本研究旨在评价腹部CT造影对急性腹痛患者的诊断价值,并与参考标准(手术/病理或临床随访)进行比较。设计:这是一项横断面诊断性试验研究。地点:圣文森特大学医院基金会(Medellín,哥伦比亚)。材料和方法:这是一项横断面方便样本诊断试验研究,连续选择接受腹部非对比CT检查的患者。所有患者均为因腹部不适而就诊的患者。所有同意的患者都进行了非对比和静脉对比CT扫描。两名具有不同专业水平的放射科医生独立评估非对比断层扫描图像,以指定诊断结果。最终诊断独立于患者的临床病史。未接受手术的患者在住院期间回顾其临床病史。未住院者在出院后2周通过电话了解其临床病程。结果:157例患者中,19.1%因急性病理而行手术。对于非对比腹部造影,获得了93.3%的敏感性(95% CI 82.7-100)、96.8%的特异性(95% CI 93.4-100)、87.5%的PPV (95% CI 74.4-100)、98.4%的NPV (95% CI 958 - 100)、29.6的LR+ (95% CI 11.24-78.1)、0.07的LR - (95% CI 0.02-0.26)和97.4%的诊断准确性。观察者间的一致性kappa值为0.88。结论:腹部CT对急性腹痛的内科与外科病变有较好的鉴别价值。
{"title":"Performance of Noncontrast Multidetector Computed Tomography Compared with a Reference Standard (Surgery/Pathology or Clinical Follow-up) in Diagnosing Acute, Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain","authors":"Milena Alcázar, Maria del Pilar Gutierrez, Santiago Rojas, T. Suárez, Carlos H. Morales","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1287","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous (IV) contrast is the method of choice for diagnosing and selecting treatments for surgical pathologies in patients visiting the emergency room (ER) for acute, nontraumatic abdominal pain. However, there are risks, high costs, and delays in medical attention associated with this modality. Studies have suggested performance of CT without venous contrast for diagnosing appendicitis. Nevertheless, no methodologically rigorous studies have evaluated CT without IV contrast performance when used as the main diagnostic tool for patients with acute abdominal pain. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of noncontrast abdominal CT and compare it with a reference standard (surgery/pathology or clinical follow-up) to detect surgical diseases in patients with acute abdominal pain. Design: This is a cross-sectional, diagnostic test study. Place: Hospital Universitario San Vicente Foundation (Medellín, Colombia). Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional convenience sample diagnostic test study of consecutively selected patients who underwent noncontrast CT of the abdomen. All patients were those who presented to the ER with abdominal complaints. All patients who consented underwent a noncontrast and IV contrast CT scans. Two radiologists with different levels of expertise independently evaluated the noncontrast tomography images to specify the diagnostic findings. Final diagnoses were collected independently from the patients’ clinical histories. Patients who did not undergo surgery, their clinical histories were reviewed during hospitalization. Those who were not hospitalized had their clinical course obtained by telephone 2 weeks after being discharged. Results: Of the 157 included patients, 19.1% underwent surgery because of an acute pathology. For noncontrast abdominal contrast tomography, values of 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 82.7–100), 96.8% specificity (95% CI 93.4–100), 87.5% PPV (95% CI 74.4–100), 98.4% NPV (95% CI 95.8–100), 29.6 LR+ (95% CI 11.24–78.1), 0.07 LR− (95% CI 0.02–0.26), and 97.4% diagnostic accuracy were obtained. The interobserver concordance had a kappa value of 0.88. Conclusion: Noncontrast abdominal CT performs well in differentiating medical vs surgical diseases in patients with acute abdominal pain.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75373000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1279
Andres V. Ayala, Sofía A Zárate, A. Zabala, Luis Pacheco, Fernando I Narváez, M. Alvear, Jose R. Negrete
A bstrAct A new human coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 is currently causing a pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Healthcare institutions including surgical centers and their workers are in risk of contagion due to high exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The objective of the present manuscript is to review the available literature and elucidate the key points for maintaining safety in laparoscopic surgery during the pandemic. Currently, any patient who requires surgery and in whom the diagnosis of COVID-19 has not been ruled out should be treated as a positive patient and the correspondent safety measures should be taken. Surgical plume is a bioproduct that places healthcare workers who are exposed to it in a potential risk of acquiring different health conditions. There is no clear evidence to affirm that the exposure to surgical plume and pneumoperitoneum can cause COVID-19; nevertheless, as we do not know yet the real risk of transmission and infectivity of particles found in surgical smoke, it is recommended to take measures for a controlled evacuation of pneumoperitoneum and the use of a simple filtration system during laparoscopic surgery. We must understand that as our entire life changed with this pandemic, laparoscopic surgery should also change in particular aspects to give our patients the best treatment under the safest conditions as possible.
{"title":"Perspectives and Recommendations for Laparoscopic Surgery in the COVID-19 Era","authors":"Andres V. Ayala, Sofía A Zárate, A. Zabala, Luis Pacheco, Fernando I Narváez, M. Alvear, Jose R. Negrete","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1279","url":null,"abstract":"A bstrAct A new human coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 is currently causing a pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Healthcare institutions including surgical centers and their workers are in risk of contagion due to high exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The objective of the present manuscript is to review the available literature and elucidate the key points for maintaining safety in laparoscopic surgery during the pandemic. Currently, any patient who requires surgery and in whom the diagnosis of COVID-19 has not been ruled out should be treated as a positive patient and the correspondent safety measures should be taken. Surgical plume is a bioproduct that places healthcare workers who are exposed to it in a potential risk of acquiring different health conditions. There is no clear evidence to affirm that the exposure to surgical plume and pneumoperitoneum can cause COVID-19; nevertheless, as we do not know yet the real risk of transmission and infectivity of particles found in surgical smoke, it is recommended to take measures for a controlled evacuation of pneumoperitoneum and the use of a simple filtration system during laparoscopic surgery. We must understand that as our entire life changed with this pandemic, laparoscopic surgery should also change in particular aspects to give our patients the best treatment under the safest conditions as possible.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73873850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-03DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1277
J. Duchesne, S. Ninokawa, K. Nordham, D. Tatum
Ab s t r Ac t Aim: To understand how social distancing orders impact the incidence of traumatic injuries. Background: In an attempt to blunt the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, social distancing and stay home orders have been enforced. Here we analyze the effect that these public health measures have had on the rate of traumatic injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the number of trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center from January 2019 through April 2020. Patients were identified using an institutional trauma registry and include trauma transfers, trauma activations, and admitted trauma patients. The independent samples t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess differences between groups. Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to assess normality and variances, respectively. Results: When comparing daily admissions in 2020 before and after social distancing orders, there was a significant reduction in the median daily number of trauma patients (12 vs 8.5; p < 0.0001) after the social distancing order was put into place. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the mean number of weekly trauma patients presenting to our hospital in 2020 before and after social distancing orders (86.1 vs 60.3; p < 0.0001). When looking at weekly patient counts, there was a significant reduction in blunt trauma patients when comparing preand post-social distancing (56.6 vs 35.7; p < 0.01). However, there was no change in the number of weekly penetrating injuries (17.0 vs 17.1). Conclusion: Social distancing orders have significantly reduced the number of blunt trauma patients presenting to our level 1 trauma center. Further studies will be needed to determine long-term effects of these measures.
目的:了解社交距离令对创伤性损伤发生率的影响。背景:为了遏制新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2的传播,政府实施了保持社交距离和居家令。在这里,我们分析了这些公共卫生措施对到一级创伤中心就诊的创伤性损伤率的影响。材料和方法:这是对2019年1月至2020年4月在一级创伤中心就诊的创伤患者数量的回顾性分析。使用机构创伤登记处识别患者,包括创伤转移,创伤激活和入院的创伤患者。采用独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验评估组间差异。夏皮罗-威尔克检验和莱文检验分别用于评估正态性和方差。结果:当比较2020年社交距离令实施前后的每日入院人数时,每日创伤患者中位数显著减少(12 vs 8.5;P < 0.0001)。此外,在社交距离令实施前后,2020年每周到我院就诊的创伤患者平均人数显著减少(86.1 vs 60.3;P < 0.0001)。在观察每周患者数量时,在比较社交距离前和社交距离后,钝性创伤患者的数量显著减少(56.6 vs 35.7;P < 0.01)。然而,每周穿透伤的数量没有变化(17.0 vs 17.1)。结论:保持社交距离的命令显著减少了到我们一级创伤中心就诊的钝性创伤患者的数量。需要进一步的研究来确定这些措施的长期影响。
{"title":"Effects of Social Distancing on the Incidence of Traumatic Injuries","authors":"J. Duchesne, S. Ninokawa, K. Nordham, D. Tatum","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1277","url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Aim: To understand how social distancing orders impact the incidence of traumatic injuries. Background: In an attempt to blunt the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, social distancing and stay home orders have been enforced. Here we analyze the effect that these public health measures have had on the rate of traumatic injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the number of trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center from January 2019 through April 2020. Patients were identified using an institutional trauma registry and include trauma transfers, trauma activations, and admitted trauma patients. The independent samples t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess differences between groups. Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to assess normality and variances, respectively. Results: When comparing daily admissions in 2020 before and after social distancing orders, there was a significant reduction in the median daily number of trauma patients (12 vs 8.5; p < 0.0001) after the social distancing order was put into place. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the mean number of weekly trauma patients presenting to our hospital in 2020 before and after social distancing orders (86.1 vs 60.3; p < 0.0001). When looking at weekly patient counts, there was a significant reduction in blunt trauma patients when comparing preand post-social distancing (56.6 vs 35.7; p < 0.01). However, there was no change in the number of weekly penetrating injuries (17.0 vs 17.1). Conclusion: Social distancing orders have significantly reduced the number of blunt trauma patients presenting to our level 1 trauma center. Further studies will be needed to determine long-term effects of these measures.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"2013 1","pages":"122-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86334901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}