首页 > 最新文献

Psychology learning and teaching最新文献

英文 中文
Training in Aging as a Diversity Factor: Education, Knowledge, and Attitudes Amongst Psychology Doctoral Students. 作为多元化因素的老龄化培训:心理学博士生的教育、知识和态度。
Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-19 DOI: 10.1177/14757257221130483
Kirsten L Graham, Jennifer Moye

The population of older adults is growing rapidly and there will be an increased need for psychological services for this population. Current estimates indicate a significant workforce gap such that all psychologists, regardless of specialty area, will likely be called upon to work with older adults. Education and experience in the care of older adults has been consistently connected with improved competence and interest in working with this population. Further, the APA requires that training programmes adequately cover aspects of individual diversity, though age-related education and training may be largely lacking and/or minimally addressed. The present study explores age-related training within a sample of psychology doctoral students. Participants (n = 85) consisted of doctoral trainees recruited via email (listserv) to complete an anonymous online survey as part of a larger study. Results indicate that (1) training in aging varies and is inadequate in some programmes; (2) knowledge in aging varies and is associated with training opportunities; (3) training in aging is less than training in race/ ethnic diversity; and (4) attitudes toward older clients are most strongly predicted by extent of training in aging. The authors offer suggestions for expanding age-related aspects into generalist training.

老年人口正在迅速增长,对心理服务的需求也将随之增加。目前的估计表明,劳动力缺口很大,因此所有心理学家,无论其专业领域如何,都可能被要求为老年人提供服务。接受过有关老年人护理方面的教育并拥有相关经验的人,其工作能力和兴趣都会得到提高。此外,美国心理学会(APA)要求培训课程应充分涵盖个体多样性的各个方面,但与年龄相关的教育和培训可能在很大程度上缺乏和/或很少涉及。本研究以心理学博士生为样本,探讨了与年龄相关的培训。参与者(n = 85)包括通过电子邮件(listserv)招募的博士生,他们需要完成匿名在线调查,这是一项大型研究的一部分。结果表明:(1)老龄化方面的培训各不相同,而且在某些课程中培训不足;(2)老龄化方面的知识各不相同,而且与培训机会有关;(3)老龄化方面的培训少于种族/民族多样性方面的培训;以及(4)对老年客户的态度受老龄化培训程度的影响最大。作者提出了在通才培训中扩大老年相关内容的建议。
{"title":"Training in Aging as a Diversity Factor: Education, Knowledge, and Attitudes Amongst Psychology Doctoral Students.","authors":"Kirsten L Graham, Jennifer Moye","doi":"10.1177/14757257221130483","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14757257221130483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The population of older adults is growing rapidly and there will be an increased need for psychological services for this population. Current estimates indicate a significant workforce gap such that all psychologists, regardless of specialty area, will likely be called upon to work with older adults. Education and experience in the care of older adults has been consistently connected with improved competence and interest in working with this population. Further, the APA requires that training programmes adequately cover aspects of individual diversity, though age-related education and training may be largely lacking and/or minimally addressed. The present study explores age-related training within a sample of psychology doctoral students. Participants (<i>n</i> = 85) consisted of doctoral trainees recruited via email (listserv) to complete an anonymous online survey as part of a larger study. Results indicate that (1) training in aging varies and is inadequate in some programmes; (2) knowledge in aging varies and is associated with training opportunities; (3) training in aging is less than training in race/ ethnic diversity; and (4) attitudes toward older clients are most strongly predicted by extent of training in aging. The authors offer suggestions for expanding age-related aspects into generalist training.</p>","PeriodicalId":74603,"journal":{"name":"Psychology learning and teaching","volume":"22 1","pages":"39-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10793496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining Skills and Abilities During the Pandemic - Psychology Students' and Examiners' Perceptions of a Digital OSCE. 流行病期间的考试技能和能力——心理学学生和考生对数字欧安组织的看法。
Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/14757257221114038
Camilla Hakelind, Anna E Sundström

Finding valid and reliable ways to assess complex clinical skills within psychology is a challenge. Recently, there have been some examples of applying Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) in psychology for making such assessments. The aim of this study was to examine students' and examiners' perceptions of a digital OSCE in psychology regarding quality and students' feelings about the OSCE. Participants were 51 students enrolled in the Programme for Master of Science in Clinical Psychology during two semesters and nine examiners assessing each OSCE occasion, at Umeå University, Sweden. Web-based questionnaires were used for data collection. Psychometric analyses indicated that the subscales in the student questionnaire had adequate or close to adequate levels of item and scale reliability. Both students and examiners felt that the digital OSCE was realistic, valid and well-aligned with professional practice. Although students perceived the digital OSCE as stressful, the results showed that they were focused and concentrated and found the OSCE to be a positive learning experience, implying that the stress did not affect performance to any significant extent. Based on the examiners' experiences, it can be concluded that there are both advantages and disadvantages which need to be considered when planning future digital OSCEs.

在心理学中找到有效和可靠的方法来评估复杂的临床技能是一项挑战。最近,有一些应用心理学中的客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)进行此类评估的例子。本研究的目的是检验学生和考官在心理学上对数字欧安组织的看法,包括质量和学生对欧安组织的感受。参与者是瑞典乌莫大学临床心理学理学硕士课程的51名学生,为期两个学期,每一次欧安组织考试都有9名考官进行评估。数据收集采用了基于网络的调查问卷。心理测量分析表明,学生问卷中的分量表具有足够或接近足够的项目和量表可靠性水平。学生和考官都认为数字欧安组织是现实的、有效的,并且与专业实践非常一致。尽管学生们认为数字欧安组织有压力,但研究结果表明,他们注意力集中,发现欧安组织是一种积极的学习体验,这意味着压力不会对表现产生任何重大影响。根据审查人员的经验,可以得出结论,在规划未来的数字OSCE时,既有优点,也有缺点。
{"title":"Examining Skills and Abilities During the Pandemic - Psychology Students' and Examiners' Perceptions of a Digital OSCE.","authors":"Camilla Hakelind,&nbsp;Anna E Sundström","doi":"10.1177/14757257221114038","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14757257221114038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Finding valid and reliable ways to assess complex clinical skills within psychology is a challenge. Recently, there have been some examples of applying Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) in psychology for making such assessments. The aim of this study was to examine students' and examiners' perceptions of a digital OSCE in psychology regarding quality and students' feelings about the OSCE. Participants were 51 students enrolled in the Programme for Master of Science in Clinical Psychology during two semesters and nine examiners assessing each OSCE occasion, at Umeå University, Sweden. Web-based questionnaires were used for data collection. Psychometric analyses indicated that the subscales in the student questionnaire had adequate or close to adequate levels of item and scale reliability. Both students and examiners felt that the digital OSCE was realistic, valid and well-aligned with professional practice. Although students perceived the digital OSCE as stressful, the results showed that they were focused and concentrated and found the OSCE to be a positive learning experience, implying that the stress did not affect performance to any significant extent. Based on the examiners' experiences, it can be concluded that there are both advantages and disadvantages which need to be considered when planning future digital OSCEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74603,"journal":{"name":"Psychology learning and teaching","volume":"21 3","pages":"278-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10285802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Implementation of Interdisciplinary Health Technologies as Active Learning Strategies in the Classroom: A Course Redesign. 跨学科卫生技术作为课堂主动学习策略的实施:课程重新设计。
Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/14757257221090643
Guido G Urizar, Karissa Miller

The number of health psychology courses offered in higher education institutions has dramatically increased over the past 30 years. Health psychology courses provide students a unique opportunity to learn about important public health issues and health disparities affecting our society from a biopsychosocial perspective. Prior research indicates that students taking these courses, many of whom are non-biology majors, often report feeling anxious about learning the underlying biological mechanisms that affect health outcomes, particularly as they relate to stress and disease. Therefore, innovative teaching strategies, such as the use of active learning approaches, are needed to promote student confidence and engagement in learning these interdisciplinary models of health. Despite rapid advancements and innovations in health technologies, few health psychology courses have integrated these technologies as a modality of active learning. This article describes the implementation of health technologies (e.g., biosensors, biofeedback equipment, wearable technologies) as an active learning modality and innovative teaching approach to promote student engagement and learning outcomes in an undergraduate health psychology course taught in the U.S. Eighty students from a minority-serving university participated in this pilot course redesign. Student responses to the use of health technologies in their course were very positive. A description of the course curriculum is provided and results from student responses and feedback are presented. Implications and recommendations for implementing these technologies and pedagogies in future health courses are also discussed, including university support for sustaining these high impact teaching practices.

在过去的30年里,高等教育机构开设的健康心理学课程的数量急剧增加。健康心理学课程为学生提供了一个独特的机会,从生物心理社会的角度了解影响我们社会的重要公共卫生问题和健康差异。先前的研究表明,参加这些课程的学生(其中许多是非生物学专业的学生)经常报告说,他们对学习影响健康结果的潜在生物学机制感到焦虑,特别是当它们与压力和疾病有关时。因此,需要创新的教学策略,例如使用主动学习方法,以促进学生对学习这些跨学科健康模式的信心和参与。尽管健康技术的快速发展和创新,很少有健康心理学课程将这些技术作为主动学习的一种方式。本文描述了健康技术(如生物传感器、生物反馈设备、可穿戴技术)作为一种主动学习方式和创新教学方法的实施,以促进美国一所少数民族大学本科健康心理学课程的学生参与和学习成果。学生对在课程中使用卫生技术的反应非常积极。提供了课程的描述和学生的反应和反馈的结果。还讨论了在未来的卫生课程中实施这些技术和教学法的影响和建议,包括大学对维持这些高影响力教学实践的支持。
{"title":"Implementation of Interdisciplinary Health Technologies as Active Learning Strategies in the Classroom: A Course Redesign.","authors":"Guido G Urizar,&nbsp;Karissa Miller","doi":"10.1177/14757257221090643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221090643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of health psychology courses offered in higher education institutions has dramatically increased over the past 30 years. Health psychology courses provide students a unique opportunity to learn about important public health issues and health disparities affecting our society from a biopsychosocial perspective. Prior research indicates that students taking these courses, many of whom are non-biology majors, often report feeling anxious about learning the underlying biological mechanisms that affect health outcomes, particularly as they relate to stress and disease. Therefore, innovative teaching strategies, such as the use of active learning approaches, are needed to promote student confidence and engagement in learning these interdisciplinary models of health. Despite rapid advancements and innovations in health technologies, few health psychology courses have integrated these technologies as a modality of active learning. This article describes the implementation of health technologies (e.g., biosensors, biofeedback equipment, wearable technologies) as an active learning modality and innovative teaching approach to promote student engagement and learning outcomes in an undergraduate health psychology course taught in the U.S. Eighty students from a minority-serving university participated in this pilot course redesign. Student responses to the use of health technologies in their course were very positive. A description of the course curriculum is provided and results from student responses and feedback are presented. Implications and recommendations for implementing these technologies and pedagogies in future health courses are also discussed, including university support for sustaining these high impact teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74603,"journal":{"name":"Psychology learning and teaching","volume":"21 2","pages":"151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997755/pdf/nihms-1875152.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9481041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Technostress During COVID-19: Action Regulation Hindrances and the Mediating Role of Basic Human Needs among Psychology Students. 新冠肺炎期间的技术压力:行为调节障碍和心理学学生基本人类需求的中介作用。
Pub Date : 2022-05-31 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/14757257221102563
Nathalie Schauffel, Lena Maria Kaufmann, Mona Rynek, Thomas Ellwart

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an abrupt change from in-person to online teaching in higher education, resulting in increased use of information and communication technology (ICT) and students' stress and uncertainty. Integrating theories of human motivation, stress, and humane work design, we investigated whether different types of action regulation hindrances (ARH) pertaining to human (ICT competence deficits), technology (technical problems), interaction (coordination difficulties), and task aspects (work overload) related to technostress (H1). Furthermore, we examined if this relationship was mediated by satisfaction of the basic human needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness (H2). Our analysis of causes and mechanisms of technostress is based on cross-sectional survey data (self-report) from 205 psychology students attending an organizational psychology class that was switched from an in-person to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Structural equation modeling revealed that different types of ARH (i.e., ICT competence deficits, technical problems, coordination difficulties, work overload) positively predicted technostress (β  =  .17 to β  =  .42, p < .05). The effects were (partially) mediated by satisfaction of the need for autonomy (β  =  .11 to β  =  .15, p < .05), for all ARH except technical problems (β  =  .01, p  =  .86). We discuss implications for online course planning, technostress prevention as well as potential interventions beyond pandemic times.

新冠肺炎大流行导致高等教育从住院教学突然转变为在线教学,导致信息和通信技术的使用增加,学生面临压力和不确定性。结合人类动机、压力和人性化工作设计的理论,我们调查了与技术压力(H1)相关的与人类(ICT能力缺陷)、技术(技术问题)、互动(协调困难)和任务方面(工作过载)有关的不同类型的行动调节障碍(ARH)。此外,我们研究了这种关系是否是通过满足人类对能力、自主性和相关性的基本需求来调节的(H2)。我们对技术压力的原因和机制的分析基于205名心理学学生的横断面调查数据(自我报告),这些学生参加了一个组织心理学课程,由于新冠肺炎大流行,该课程从住院改为在线。结构方程模型显示,不同类型的ARH(即信息和通信技术能力缺陷、技术问题、协调困难、工作过载)正预测技术压力(β  =  .17至β  =  .42,p p p  =  .86)。我们讨论了对在线课程规划、技术压力预防以及疫情后潜在干预措施的影响。
{"title":"Technostress During COVID-19: Action Regulation Hindrances and the Mediating Role of Basic Human Needs among Psychology Students.","authors":"Nathalie Schauffel,&nbsp;Lena Maria Kaufmann,&nbsp;Mona Rynek,&nbsp;Thomas Ellwart","doi":"10.1177/14757257221102563","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14757257221102563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic led to an abrupt change from in-person to online teaching in higher education, resulting in increased use of information and communication technology (ICT) and students' stress and uncertainty. Integrating theories of human motivation, stress, and humane work design, we investigated whether different types of action regulation hindrances (ARH) pertaining to human (ICT competence deficits), technology (technical problems), interaction (coordination difficulties), and task aspects (work overload) related to technostress (H1). Furthermore, we examined if this relationship was mediated by satisfaction of the basic human needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness (H2). Our analysis of causes and mechanisms of technostress is based on cross-sectional survey data (self-report) from 205 psychology students attending an organizational psychology class that was switched from an in-person to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Structural equation modeling revealed that different types of ARH (i.e., ICT competence deficits, technical problems, coordination difficulties, work overload) positively predicted technostress (β  =  .17 to β  =  .42, <i>p</i> < .05). The effects were (partially) mediated by satisfaction of the need for autonomy (β  =  .11 to β  =  .15, <i>p</i> < .05), for all ARH except technical problems (β  =  .01, <i>p</i>  =  .86). We discuss implications for online course planning, technostress prevention as well as potential interventions beyond pandemic times.</p>","PeriodicalId":74603,"journal":{"name":"Psychology learning and teaching","volume":"21 3","pages":"235-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162883/pdf/10.1177_14757257221102563.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10285801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Psychology learning and teaching
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1