AIDS patient care and STDs最新文献

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends universal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in emergency departments (EDs) for patients (above 13 years). In 2017, Jackson Health System (Miami, FL) established a successful adult ED-based universal opt-out HIV screening program. However, when expanded to its affiliated pediatric ED (PED) as an opt-in protocol, only 1.3% of all adolescents received universal screening (only 1.7% were tested based on their chief complaints). We explore barriers to PED testing by comparing the attitudes of providers, patients, and caregivers. Institutional review board-approved surveys were administered anonymously to each group. Raw aggregate data were analyzed for trends. Providers' responses were stratified by role and responses were compared via a Mann-Whitney test. Twenty-four providers responded; they agreed that testing is warranted (x = 3.58 σ 1.32) and not time-consuming (x = 2.33 σ 1.05). There was no agreement on the perceived role of providers to perform testing. Attendings reported a high chance of breaching patients' confidentiality (x̄ = 3.27 σ 1.35), while nurses did not (x̄ = 2.33 σ 1.51). Of the 62 patient responses, 62.9% were amenable to testing, 69.4% would consent to 4th-generation serum testing if less invasive options (e.g., oral swabs) were unavailable, and 77.4% would inform caregivers of results. Of the 37 caregiver responses, 91.9% felt comfortable with their child consenting to testing. In this population, patients and caregivers appear amenable to universal screening. Low testing rates may be explained by providers' disagreement on their role to perform testing and concerns about confidentiality. Future studies should further explore protocol-based flaws and providers' views.

As HIV diagnoses continue to decrease and rates of viral suppression increase in the United States, key populations of underserved individuals represent a disproportionate share of those left undiagnosed, unengaged in care, and not virally suppressed. In 2021, the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau funded 20 HIV care organizations across the United States to implement seven innovative evidence-based interventions to engage individuals in the following four focus areas: LGBTQ+ youth, people with substance-use disorder, individuals with incarceration experience, and those for whom telehealth may reduce barriers to care. This article explores themes of implementer experiences common across interventions serving the four focus areas. Data sources include key informant interviews (n = 94) with members of the implementation teams, observation, and document review. Thematic analytic methods were first inductive, identifying semantic themes from observation and document review, then deductive, selecting coded interview data for analysis of latent themes present and salient across focus areas. We identified three main themes as follows: (1) challenging by design, (2) enhanced client-centered care, and (3) leveraging relationships. We present these themes as distinct concepts and discuss how they operate in relation to one another using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. Teams implementing interventions to engage people with HIV who remain out of care may benefit from adopting the following: an enhanced client-centered orientation with a focus on understanding the context of clients' lives; a high level of organizational and programmatic flexibility; an individualized, trauma-informed approach to enrollment and intervention delivery; and thoughtfully cultivated relationships among implementers, clients, and organizational partners.

Bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain prominent in the United States among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Doxycycline for post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP) is a regimen by which the antibiotic doxycycline is taken after sex to prevent bacterial STDs, such as, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis. Despite this, this study was conducted because there are a limited number of publications that describe GBMSM's knowledge of, and interest in, taking DoxyPEP and preferences regarding its implementation. We conducted a mixed-methods study between November 2023 and March 2024. Participants (N = 21) completed a semi-structured interview and survey and were eligible if they were a cisgender man who reported having anal sex with another man in the past year and lived in the greater Los Angeles area. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The majority of participants identified as gay (90%) and a racial/ethnic minority (86%); 33% were living with HIV and 43% had been diagnosed with an STD in the prior year. Participants' mean age was 40 years (standard deviation [SD] = 15) and they reported an average of 4.5 (SD = 2.27) sexual partners in the past year. Interviews revealed that knowledge of DoxyPEP was low (28%), but most (81%) were interested in using DoxyPEP after learning about its potential. The vast majority were willing to pay $10-$20 for a 1-month supply but preferred that it be free or covered by insurance. Most preferred to get DoxyPEP from a medical provider or over-the-counter at a pharmacy. Others suggested sexualized venues, such as private sex parties, bathhouses, sex clubs, etc. The greatest concerns about its use included possible side effects, antibiotic resistance, or that it would lead to decreased condom use and increased number of sex partners. A common misconception was that DoxyPEP could prevent both a bacterial STD and HIV. DoxyPEP has strong potential as a widely accepted STD prevention method, but its successful adoption will require proactive strategies to increase GBMSM's knowledge. Implementation programs might consider nontraditional venues where sex between men is regularly occurring.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective strategy in reducing HIV transmission, yet its uptake remains suboptimal. Health care providers play a vital role in facilitating PrEP access and care. This qualitative study explores health care providers' perspectives on the oral PrEP care continuum for adults, emphasizing barriers, facilitators, and missed opportunities in PrEP implementation. Drawing on interviews with 18 primary care providers in New York State, our research investigates multi-level factors influencing PrEP awareness, initiation, and management. Findings reveal significant barriers at the patient level, such as low awareness, stigma, and misconceptions about HIV risk. Provider-level challenges include knowledge gaps, discomfort in discussing sexual health, and logistical constraints. Structural factors such as insufficient infrastructure and high costs impede consistent PrEP management. Facilitators identified include proactive provider-patient communication, educational resources, and workflow integration strategies. Subgroup analyses highlight variations in attitudes based on provider demographics and experience. Younger and female providers are more proactive in discussing PrEP, while older and male providers often perceive it as less relevant. Nurses emphasize patient education and trust-building, contrasting with physicians' focus on logistical challenges. Providers experienced in prescribing PrEP view it as a valuable prevention tool, while nonprescribers report hesitancy and limited familiarity. Discrepancies in patient-perceived versus actual HIV risk, as well as provider assumptions about patient candidacy for PrEP, underscore the need for routine, stigma-free discussions about HIV prevention. This study emphasizes the importance of targeted provider training, system-level support, and inclusive policies to enhance PrEP uptake. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators can advance public health efforts, fostering equitable and effective HIV prevention strategies.

People who inject drugs (PWID) face a heightened risk of acquiring/transmitting HIV, enhanced by stigma and limited health care access. In Mexico, studies on PWID have focused on the north of the country. This study aimed to delineate characteristics of PWID living with HIV in Mexico City, identify profiles based on the substance injected, and evaluate variables associated with forming transmission clusters. A cross-sectional study was conducted with data from 2019 to 2023. Participants completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral variables. Bivariate and multi-variate logistic regression analyses were made. Among PWID, 96.3% were male (n = 437), of which 90.1% were men who have sex with men, 1.5% were cisgender females (n = 7), and 2.2% were transgender females (n = 10). PWID were more likely to use drugs during sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-6.4, p < 0.001), have more sexually transmitted diseases (aOR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9, p = 0.035), and have less condom use (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.002). The most frequently injected substance was crystal meth, and those who injected it were more likely to have syphilis (aOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-7.1, p = 0.021), use Grindr (aOR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-8.9, p < 0.001), and engage in high-risk practices (aOR = 6.9, 95% CI: 2.1-22.7, p < 0.001) in the last 3 months. Those under 25 years (p = 0.002), recently infected (p < 0.001), and who practiced insertive anal sex (p < 0.001) were more likely to be part of a cluster. These findings, and the increasing use of crystal meth, underscore the critical need to implement targeted risk-reduction strategies for PWID living with HIV and to design interventions responsive to specific profiles associated with different substances, taking into account not only their risk practices but also protective behaviors such as HIV testing.

In a cohort of transgender women (TGW) with abnormal anal cytology (AAC) in Washington, DC, we determined the rates of and factors associated with completion of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). This mixed-methods study used a sequential study design. In an academic-community clinic, we recruited TGW who provided blood samples, anal swabs for anal cytology, and completed surveys. For the quantitative phase of this study, we used χ² test to compare factors associated with HRA completion among TGW with AAC. From that cohort, we used purposive sampling to recruit 16 TGW for qualitative interviews, based on their HRA completion status. We used thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Of 75 TGW, 36 (48%) had AAC, 32 (43%) were referred to HRA, and 15 (20%) completed HRA. HRA completion was associated with being employed (75% vs. 25%; p = 0.01) in the quantitative phase, and low socioeconomic status (SES) was considered a barrier to completing HRA in the qualitative phase. HRA completion was associated with suppressed HIV (67% vs. 18%; p = 0.01) in the quantitative phase. In the qualitative phase, trans-affirming care, receptive anal sex, and engaging in sex work were identified as motivators to completing HRA. In a population of TGW, we found high rates of AAC and low rates of HRA completion. Interventions targeting this gap should address barriers associated with low SES and HIV viremia in TGW. Trans-affirming care and the impact on anal sexual practices should be used as motivators to engage TGW in anal cancer screening.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention tool available in several modalities (e.g., daily oral, injectable, implants, rectal douching). The Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative, a national initiative that began in 2019 as a partnership among the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health), seeks to increase PrEP engagement for groups experiencing HIV inequities, including Latino sexual minority men (LSMM). Given the limited research on PrEP modality preferences among LSMM, this study aimed to explore and characterize these preferences. LSMM (n = 214) not using PrEP and living in South Florida participated in the DÍMELO study, which examined PrEP engagement among LSMM in South Florida. Authors employed latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups of LSMM based on their PrEP modality preferences and examined predictors of class membership. LCA results led to a three-class solution with participants who were: (1) reluctant to use most PrEP modalities (30.5%), (2) PrEP willing, with constraints (36.0%), and (3) enthusiastically accepting of all PrEP modalities (33.5%). LSMM in the reluctant class (Class 1) showed minimal interest in most PrEP modalities. The constrained class (Class 2) displayed interest in daily oral, on-demand, and quarterly injectable PrEP while the enthusiastic class (Class 3) demonstrated high interest in all modalities except rectal douching. Key predictors of PrEP modality preferences were altruism, community normalization of PrEP, and migration history. Understanding LSMM's PrEP modality preferences can enhance the reach of PrEP to LSMM, a group the EHE initiative prioritizes. The current findings suggest the need to tailor PrEP outreach efforts to promote various PrEP modalities based on LSMM's preferences.

Community health workers (CHWs) play a significant role in supporting health services delivery in communities with few trained health care providers. There has been limited research on ways to optimize the role of CHWs in HIV prevention service delivery. This study explored CHWs' experiences with offering HIV prevention services [HIV testing and HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP)] during three pilot studies in rural communities in Kenya and Uganda, which aimed to increase biomedical HIV prevention coverage via a structured patient-centered HIV prevention delivery model. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2021 to March 2022 with CHWs (N = 8) and their clients (N = 18) in the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) SAPPHIRE study. A seven-person multi-regional team coded and analyzed data using a thematic analysis approach. CHWs offered clients PrEP and PEP refills, adherence monitoring, counseling on medications, and phone consultations. Clients reported CHWs maintained close interpersonal relationships with clients, and demonstrated trustworthiness and professionalism. Some clients reported that community members trusted the authenticity of CHWs, while others expressed concerns about the CHWs' ability to maintain confidentiality, and felt that some community members would be uncomfortable receiving HIV services from them. CHWs valued the expansion of their role to include prevention services but expressed concerns about balancing competing demands of CHW responsibilities, income-generating activities, and family roles. CHWs were well accepted as HIV prevention service providers despite contextual challenges. CHWs need ongoing training support. Establishing structures for remunerating CHWs in health systems could improve their performance and retention.