Spartan medical research journal最新文献

Introduction: Fracture treatment has been documented since the times of ancient Egyptian and Greek civilization, with fracture reduction techniques and the apparatus for immobilization developed over three millennia. Over the last 150 years, aseptic technique, anesthesia, antibiotics, and internal implants have changed how orthopedic specialists approach fracture care. More recently, there has been an increased promotion in the medical literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes of nonsurgical treatment of common upper and lower extremity closed fractures.

Methods: In this paper, the authors review the history of closed extremity fracture treatments, outline contemporary studies regarding treatments of non-displaced fractures, and discuss the recent literature that has informed orthopedic surgeon-patient decision-making discussions regarding closed fracture management.

Conclusions: Based on the results of this literature review, orthopedic providers should consider the preferable outcomes associated with nonoperative fracture management such as lower infection rates, the possibility of rapid functional improvements and lower healthcare costs. Nonoperative methods for closed fractures can sometimes be more safely delivered even with more difficult fractures. This may be of particular benefit to patients with higher surgical risks, minimizing exposure to treatments that are not only more invasive and expensive, but that can impose greater postoperative risks.

Background: In 1995, to reduce the transmission of Tuberculosis (TB) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that all patients discharged from hospitals be required to have chest x-rays (i.e., radiography) performed before admission to long term care facilities (LTCFs). Previously independently living patients (PILPs) who undergo elective total knee replacement (TKA) surgery are a population at higher risk to end up in LTCFs for rehabilitation. By 2017, the incidence of TB was 9,105 cases compared to 22,762 in 1995. However, the recommendations that hospitals be required to perform a chest x-ray in all patients (including PILPs) being transferred to LTCF's have remained in place. The purposes of this study were to: a) determine the incidence of TB-positive chest x-rays in PILPS discharged to LTCFs after undergoing elective TKA surgery, and b) assess the cost (i.e., both financial and possible exposure to unnecessary radiation) of mandated chest x-rays before hospital discharge to LTCF for PILPs.

Methods: Retrospective 2012-2017 patient chart data were collected from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) to identify all elective TKAs for PILPs performed at two Ascension participating centers. Study data included sex, age, body mass index (BMI), length of stay, comorbidities, and chest x-ray results before discharge. Patients who underwent surgery for fracture, infection, trauma, or malignancy were excluded from the study. Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were used for continuous data.

Results: The authors identified 4,041 total elective TKA's, from which 500 PILPs were discharged to a LTCF due to functional, medical and/or social concerns. Chest x-rays were associated with 500 (100%) negative findings for TB. Overall hospital costs for chest x-rays for patient's being discharged to an extended care facility totaled $90,848.

Conclusions: The mandated use of chest x-rays for TB screening of PILPs undergoing elective surgery TKA prior to discharge to LTCFs appear to place an unnecessary financial burden on the healthcare system. The mandatory use of x-rays for assessment of possible TB infection before transfer to LTCFs appears to also expose PILPs unnecessarily to radiation. Although further studies are needed to verify these results, the authors recommend that perhaps instead chest x-rays should be reserved for patients with specific comorbidities (e.g., patients on immunosuppressive therapy, with HIV, etc.) or for those patients residing in LTCFs prior to surgery.

Introduction: Although typically receiving little government funding, free clinics help ensure access to affordable quality health care to the medically underserved. Established in 2004, the authors' metropolitan Detroit Health Unit on Davison Avenue (HUDA) Clinic delivers primary care and specialized services to uninsured populations. The authors compared proportionate changes in A1c levels compared to prior national averages to evaluate the significance of care a free diabetes clinic can provide to uninsured populations.

Methods: Retrospective data from 2017-2019 were reviewed of adult patients who have been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes. From HUDA Clinic medical records, data were collected concerning patient demographics, insurance status, pregnancy, major comorbidities and several factors related to diabetes standards of care.

Results: There were a total of 2,231 patient visits to HUDA Clinic in 2019, of which 125 patients (5.6%) received care for their Type 2 diabetes. Forty (32%) clinic patients who had a visit in 2019 had an HbA1c <7.0 and 29 (23%) had an HbA1c > 9.5. This is comparable to the 2020 National Diabetes Statistics Report in which approximately 50% (n = 15.6 million) of Americans had an HbA1c < 7.0 and 14% (n = 5.1 million) had an HbA1c > 9.5.

Conclusions: Huda Clinic's diabetes care percentages were quite comparable to state and national data and CDC parameters, although these comparative results need to be considered in terms of the authors' smaller sample size. These overall results indicate that health care providers can meet major recommended diabetic care at inner-city free clinics in metropolitan communities. Future provider and patient study studies regarding free clinic care patterns are clearly required to identify gaps in healthcare access and formulate and test specific strategies to improve diabetes-related outcomes.

Introduction: Chest pain is one of the most common chief presenting complaints occurring in most Emergency Departments. The HEART score is a validated risk stratification tool commonly used to evaluate chest pain. Prior research has demonstrated the existence of complex racial variations in health care, specifically in what tests are ordered (or accepted by patients) during evaluation and treatment of cardiac disease. The authors hypothesized that chest pain management (i.e., disposition to hospital/observation unit and rates of stress testing) patterns and longitudinal outcomes (i.e., death and 30-day readmission) would occur differently in African Americans despite systematic use of the HEART score.

Methods: Funded by the Statewide Campus System, this study was comprised of a retrospective chart review of a sample of eligible patients presenting with chest pain to the authors' 345-bed community-based Michigan hospital.

Results: Of the 1,412 eligible sample patients, 886 (63%) reported their racial affiliation as White, 473 (33%) African-American, and 53 (4%) "Other". The average HEART score in Whites was 3.92 (SD = 1.89) compared to 3.31 (SD = 1.79) in African-Americans, (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.40-0.82). However, White patients' odds of admission to observation or inpatient was 1.49 times higher (95% CI: 1.04 - 2.15), with every unit increase in HEART score increasing the odds ratio of admission by 3.24 times (95% CI: 2.79 - 3.76). White patients were also 2.37 times more likely to receive (or accept) stress tests than African American patients (95% CI: 1.41 - 3.88). Only five (0.01%) of 458 White patients with HEART score between 4 and 6 experienced 30-day readmission or death whereas seven (0.04%) of 193 African-American patients experienced these outcomes (p = 0.04 with OR 3.40, 95% CI: 1.07 - 10.9).

Conclusions: Although the authors were unable to precisely distinguish the provider (e.g., desire to order testing) and patient-driven (e.g., desire to accept testing) factors likely to contribute to measured differences, these results suggest continued complex racial variations concerning hospital admission and stress testing in chest pain patients. Further studies are needed to analyze potential systems or subject-level factors influencing the multi-dimensional phenomenon of chest pain management across racial affiliation.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to maintain the health and safety of caregivers. This study was conducted in 2020 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external nasal dilator strips (ENDS) coupled with N95 respirators in a sample of community hospital emergency department personnel.

Methods: After obtaining written consent, the authors tested participants' response to exercise (i.e., walking up 10 flights of stairs) while wearing an N95 respirator, both with and without an ENDS. The authors measured participants' heart rate and respiratory effort responses over four minutes following their exercise trial. A convenience sample of these personnel also repeated their respirator fit testing while wearing an ENDS with the N95 style they had previously been fitted for.

Results: A total of N = 50 participants were enrolled. Peak heart rate while wearing an ENDS was 125 beats per minute (BPM) with the ENDS versus 130 BPM without (p = 0.21). The Borg Exertion Score while wearing an ENDS peaked at 13 with the ENDS versus 14 without (p = 0.08). However, when subjects were surveyed before and after the trial upon whether they would consider using an ENDS beneath their N95 using a scale of 1-5, their interest in this significantly increased (p = 0.004). Four of the 13 (31%) participants who completed repeated fit testing while wearing the ENDS beneath their N95 respirator failed the repeat testing.

Conclusions: These results first suggest that a sizable proportion of ED personnel may fail N95 fit testing while wearing an ENDS beneath the N95 mask for which they had been previously fitted. Although providers' subjective interest in use of ENDS increased, these results also demonstrate that use of an ENDS beneath an N95 respirator may not significantly increase exercise tolerance.

Introduction: Gas accumulation in human joint spaces has been generally described as the vacuum phenomenon (VP). To date, the sacroiliac joint VP has been associated mostly with pathological, particularly degenerative conditions (e.g., arthritis, obesity, discal degenerations, fractures, dislocations, avascular necrosis).

Objective: The study aimed to examine the characteristics of the physiological form of VP and its radiological patterns in a sample of pediatric patients.

Methods: A sample of seventy patients between 0 and 17 years old (mean age, 11.4 ± 5.54) were included in the study. Sample VP cases was evaluated according to types, age group, anatomic localization, gender, and sides. RESULTS: Two (2.9%) of sample children had degenerative VP, with 24 (34.2%) of patients demonstrating physiological VP in the sacroiliac joints. VP rates significantly increased after nine years of age (p < 0.01) and 83% of physiological VP cases were determined to be bilateral.

Conclusions: Although degenerative VP is a rare entity in children, non-pathological VP can be a more common aspect of sacroiliac anatomy. Although sacroiliac VP is frequently an underreported or omitted finding in imaging studies, this condition may be clinically important as a clue for other degenerative diagnoses. Normal variants of VP may be clinically important in children since they may mimic inflammatory and infectious pathologies during magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography images.

Introduction: The transfer of individuals (i.e., residents) between senior care facilities (SCF) and the emergency department (ED) remains an ongoing healthcare quality gap as communication of key resident information is often lost. For this study, a sample of SCF representatives were invited to join a collaborative group termed Safe Transition of All Residents For yoU and Me (STARForUM, STAR-F) to improve SCF resident transitions of care.

Study purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to invite a convenience sample of SCF facilities to join a collaborative intervention named Safe Transition of All Residents For yoU and Me (STARForUM, STAR-F) to improve information exchange during SCF residents' transitions of care. The potential influence of a hospital-SCF collaboration program to improve transfer of essential SCF resident information sent to the hospital ED was used as an evaluation measure.

Methods: This study project enrolled a total of 120 residents (i.e., patients) with 40 (33%) transferred from participating STAR-F facilities.

Results: Following the authors' development of a transfer checklist, STAR-F facilities sent a significantly greater number of essential elements comprised of the resident's medical history information to the ED compared to non-STAR-F facilities. Controlling for the standard classification of skill level of the individual facility, STAR-F residents had significantly higher essential information transmission composite scores (10.5 + 2.9 for STAR-F patients vs. 7.75 + 3.1 for non-STAR-Fs p = < 0.01) that may have served to reduce number of associated transition errors.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that a collaborative hospital-SCF initiative can significantly improve transfer of information for elderly residents during ED visits, help guide clinical decision-making and optimize care coordination.

Introduction: Lingual squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is an aggressive malignancy that carries significant mortality risk and the potential for cardiac metastasis. The authors performed a systematic review designed to characterize disease progression of LSCC cardiac metastasis by evaluating patient demographics, characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Two authors independently screened articles in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up until December 2019 for study eligibility. Demographic data, patient symptomatology, imaging findings, management strategies, and patient outcomes were obtained and analyzed. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence categorization was implemented to determine the quality of studies selected in this review.

Results: From this review, a total of 28 studies met inclusion criteria and received an OCEBM Level 4 evidence designation. Thirty-one patients were identified with cardiac metastasis from LSCC. Shortness of breath (29.0%) and chest pain (29.0%) were the most common presenting symptoms, and pericardial effusion (29.2%) and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (25.0%) were the predominant echocardiogram findings. Cardiac metastases most often presented in the right ventricle (56.7%), followed by the left ventricle (43.3%). Palliative intervention (68.2%) or chemotherapy (40.9%) were typically implemented as treatments. All sample patients expired within one year of metastatic cancer diagnosis in cases that reported mortality outcomes.

Conclusions: Patients presenting with shortness of breath, tachycardia, and a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue may indicate evaluation for LSCC cardiac metastasis. Although LSCC cardiac metastases typically favor the right and left ventricles, they are not exclusive to these sites. Palliative care may be indicated as treatment due to high mortality and overall poor outcomes from current interventions.

Introduction: The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with nerve conduction studies traditionally involves warming the hand to avoid misleading prolongation of distal latency (DL). Comparing the median nerve DL to the ulnar and radial nerves using the combined sensory index (CSI) has been reported to improve the accuracy of CTS diagnosis. During this study, the authors examined the effect of hand temperature on the CSI and diagnosis of CTS.

Methods: The authors conducted a prospective, controlled, cohort study with 20 asymptomatic control patients and 21 symptomatic patients with confirmed CTS. Symptomatic patients underwent nerve conduction studies with the CSI calculated under both cold and warm conditions.

Results: Control subjects with warm hands had an average CSI of 0.0 milliseconds (ms), and -0.3ms with cold hands. CTS subjects with warm hands had an average CSI of 3.2ms, and 3.7ms with cold hands. Although hand temperature was shown to slow sample latencies, differences calculated with the CSI did not misclassify any of the 41 sample subjects.

Conclusions: During this study, cold temperature did not result in misclassification of either control patients or CTS patients when CSI was diagnostically used. Based on these results, peak latency comparisons in cold hands can be considered as diagnostically reliable as under standard hand temperature ranges for the diagnosis of CTS, with caution warranted in borderline cases. This diagnostic technique can save time for the patient, physician, and care team without compromising quality of care. Future larger sample blinded studies at multiple electrodiagnostic sites are indicated.