首页 > 最新文献

The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey最新文献

英文 中文
Additional taxonomic refinements suggested by genomic analysis of butterflies. 蝴蝶基因组分析提出的其他分类改进建议。
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-03 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7604053
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Leina Song, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin
<p><p>Comparative analyses of genomic data reveal further insights into the phylogeny and taxonomic classification of butterflies presented here. As a result, 2 new subgenera and 2 new species of Hesperiidae are described: <i>Borna</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Godmania borincona</i> Watson, 1937) and <i>Lilla</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Choranthus lilliae</i> Bell, 1931) of <i>Choranthus</i> Scudder, 1872, <i>Cecropterus</i> (<i>Murgaria</i>) <i>markwalkeri</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Mexico: Sonora), and <i>Hedone yunga</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Bolivia: Yungas, La Paz). The <b>lectotype</b> is designated for <i>Aethilla toxeus</i> Plötz, 1882. The type locality of <i>Dion uza</i> (Hewitson, 1877) is likely in southern Brazil. A number of taxonomic changes are proposed. The following taxa are subgenera, not genera: <i>Plebulina</i> Nabokov, 1945 of <i>Icaricia</i> Nabokov, 1945; <i>Sinia</i> Forster, 1940 of <i>Glaucopsyche</i> Scudder, 1872; <i>Pseudophilotes</i> Beuret, 1958 of <i>Palaeophilotes</i> Forster, 1938; and <i>Agraulis</i> Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of <i>Dione</i> Hübner, [1819]. <i>Asbolis</i> Mabille, 1904 is a subgenus of <i>Choranthus</i> Scudder, 1872 rather than its synonym. The following are species, not subspecies or synonyms: <i>Glaucopsyche algirica</i> (Heyne, 1895) (not <i>Glaucopsyche melanops</i> (Boisduval, 1829)), <i>Chlosyne flavula</i> (W. Barnes & McDunnough, 1918) (not <i>Chlosyne palla</i> (Boisduval, 1852)), <i>Cercyonis hypoleuca</i> Hawks & J. Emmel, 1998 (not <i>Cercyonis sthenele</i> (Boisduval, 1852)), <i>Cecropterus coyote</i> (Skinner, 1892) and <i>Cecropterus nigrociliata</i> (Mabille & Boullet, 1912) (not <i>Aethilla toxeus</i> Plötz, 1882), <i>Aguna malia</i> Evans, 1952 (not <i>Aguna megaeles</i> (Mabille, 1888)), <i>Polygonus arizonensis</i> (Skinner, 1911), <i>Polygonus histrio</i> Röber, 1925, <i>Polygonus pallida</i> Röber, 1925, and <i>Polygonus hagar</i> Evans, 1952 (not <i>Polygonus leo</i> (Gmelin, [1790])), <i>Viola kuma</i> (Bell, 1942), <b>comb. nov.</b> (not <i>Pachyneuria helena</i> (Hayward, 1939)), <i>Tamela maura</i> (Snellen, 1886) (not <i>Tamela othonias</i> (Hewitson, 1878)), <i>Tamela diocles</i> (Moore, [1866]) (not <i>Tamela nigrita</i> (Latreille, [1824])), <i>Vinius phellus</i> (Mabille, 1883) (not <i>Vinius exilis</i> (Plötz, 1883)), <i>Vinius sophistes</i> (Dyar, 1918) (not <i>Vinius tryhana</i> (Kaye, 1914)), and <i>Rhinthon andricus</i> (Mabille, 1895) and <i>Rhinthon aqua</i> (Evans, 1955) (not <i>Rhinthon braesia</i> (Hewitson, 1867)). The following are new and revised species-subspecies combinations: <i>Cercyonis sthenele damei</i> W. Barnes & Benjamin, 1926 (not <i>Cercyonis meadii</i> (W. H. Edwards, 1872)) and <i>Chlosyne flavula blackmorei</i> Pelham, 2008 and <i>Chlosyne flavula calydon</i> (W. Holland, 1931) (not <i>Chlosyne palla</i>). The following are valid subspecies resurrected from
基因组数据的比较分析进一步揭示了蝴蝶的系统发育和分类。因此,本文描述了 Hesperiidae 的 2 个新亚属和 2 个新种:n. (模式种 Godmania borincona Watson, 1937) 和 Lilla Grishin, subgen. n. (模式种 Choranthus lilliae Bell, 1931) of Choranthus Scudder, 1872, Cecropterus (Murgaria) markwalkeri Grishin, sp.n.(模式产地在墨西哥:索诺拉),以及 Hedone yunga Grishin, sp.主模式被指定为 Aethilla toxeus Plötz, 1882。Dion uza (Hewitson, 1877) 的模式产地可能在巴西南部。提出了一些分类学上的变化。以下分类群为亚属,而非属:Plebulina Nabokov, 1945 of Icaricia Nabokov, 1945; Sinia Forster, 1940 of Glaucopsyche Scudder, 1872; Pseudophilotes Beuret, 1958 of Palaeophilotes Forster, 1938; and Agraulis Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of Dione Hübner, [1819].Asbolis Mabille, 1904 是 Choranthus Scudder, 1872 的亚属,而不是它的异名。以下是种,而不是亚种或异名:Glaucopsyche algirica (Heyne, 1895) (not Glaucopsyche melanops (Boisduval, 1829)), Chlosyne flavula (W. Barnes & McDunnough, 1918) (not Chlosyne palla (Boisduval, 1852)), Cercyonis hypoleuca Hawks & J. Emmel, 1998 (not Cercyonis hypoleuca Hawks & J. Emmel, 1998).Emmel, 1998 (not Cercyonis sthenele (Boisduval, 1852)), Cecropterus coyote (Skinner, 1892) and Cecropterus nigrociliata (Mabille & Boullet, 1912) (not Aethilla toxeus Plötz, 1882), Aguna malia Evans, 1952 (not Aguna megaeles (Mabille、1888)), Polygonus arizonensis (Skinner, 1911), Polygonus histrio Röber, 1925, Polygonus pallida Röber, 1925, and Polygonus hagar Evans, 1952 (not Polygonus leo (Gmelin, [1790])), Viola kuma (Bell, 1942), comb.nov.(not Pachyneuria helena (Hayward, 1939)), Tamela maura (Snellen, 1886) (not Tamela othonias (Hewitson, 1878)), Tamela diocles (Moore, [1866]) (not Tamela nigrita (Latreille, [1824])), Vinius phellus (Mabille、1883) (not Vinius exilis (Plötz, 1883)), Vinius sophistes (Dyar, 1918) (not Vinius tryhana (Kaye, 1914)), and Rhinthon andricus (Mabille, 1895) and Rhinthon aqua (Evans, 1955) (not Rhinthon braesia (Hewitson, 1867)).以下是新的和修订的种-亚种组合:Cercyonis sthenele damei W.Barnes & Benjamin, 1926 (not Cercyonis meadii (W. H. Edwards, 1872)) and Chlosyne flavula blackmorei Pelham, 2008 and Chlosyne flavula calydon (W. Holland, 1931) (not Chlosyne palla).以下是在新的和恢复的种-亚种组合中从同义词中复活的有效亚种:Chlosyne palla pola (Boisduval, 1869) (not Chlosyne gabbii gabbii (Behr, 1863)) and Cercyonis meadii mexicana R. Chermock, 1949 (not Cercyonis sthenele damei W. Barnes & Benjamin, 1926, comb. rev.).以下是新的初级主观异名:Aethilla toxeus Plötz, 1882 of Cecropterus albociliatus (Mabille, 1877) and Viola dagamba Steinhauser, 1989 of Viola kuma (Bell, 1942), comb. nov.Leucochitonea janice Ehrmann, 1907 是 Heliopetes alana (Reakirt, 1868) 的初级主观异名,而不是 Heliopetes petrus (Hübner, [1819])。Hermeuptychia sinuosa Grishin, 2021 的主模式被传播后的插图。
{"title":"Additional taxonomic refinements suggested by genomic analysis of butterflies.","authors":"Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Leina Song, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7604053","DOIUrl":"10.5281/zenodo.7604053","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comparative analyses of genomic data reveal further insights into the phylogeny and taxonomic classification of butterflies presented here. As a result, 2 new subgenera and 2 new species of Hesperiidae are described: &lt;i&gt;Borna&lt;/i&gt; Grishin, &lt;b&gt;subgen. n.&lt;/b&gt; (type species &lt;i&gt;Godmania borincona&lt;/i&gt; Watson, 1937) and &lt;i&gt;Lilla&lt;/i&gt; Grishin, &lt;b&gt;subgen. n.&lt;/b&gt; (type species &lt;i&gt;Choranthus lilliae&lt;/i&gt; Bell, 1931) of &lt;i&gt;Choranthus&lt;/i&gt; Scudder, 1872, &lt;i&gt;Cecropterus&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;Murgaria&lt;/i&gt;) &lt;i&gt;markwalkeri&lt;/i&gt; Grishin, &lt;b&gt;sp. n.&lt;/b&gt; (type locality in Mexico: Sonora), and &lt;i&gt;Hedone yunga&lt;/i&gt; Grishin, &lt;b&gt;sp. n.&lt;/b&gt; (type locality in Bolivia: Yungas, La Paz). The &lt;b&gt;lectotype&lt;/b&gt; is designated for &lt;i&gt;Aethilla toxeus&lt;/i&gt; Plötz, 1882. The type locality of &lt;i&gt;Dion uza&lt;/i&gt; (Hewitson, 1877) is likely in southern Brazil. A number of taxonomic changes are proposed. The following taxa are subgenera, not genera: &lt;i&gt;Plebulina&lt;/i&gt; Nabokov, 1945 of &lt;i&gt;Icaricia&lt;/i&gt; Nabokov, 1945; &lt;i&gt;Sinia&lt;/i&gt; Forster, 1940 of &lt;i&gt;Glaucopsyche&lt;/i&gt; Scudder, 1872; &lt;i&gt;Pseudophilotes&lt;/i&gt; Beuret, 1958 of &lt;i&gt;Palaeophilotes&lt;/i&gt; Forster, 1938; and &lt;i&gt;Agraulis&lt;/i&gt; Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of &lt;i&gt;Dione&lt;/i&gt; Hübner, [1819]. &lt;i&gt;Asbolis&lt;/i&gt; Mabille, 1904 is a subgenus of &lt;i&gt;Choranthus&lt;/i&gt; Scudder, 1872 rather than its synonym. The following are species, not subspecies or synonyms: &lt;i&gt;Glaucopsyche algirica&lt;/i&gt; (Heyne, 1895) (not &lt;i&gt;Glaucopsyche melanops&lt;/i&gt; (Boisduval, 1829)), &lt;i&gt;Chlosyne flavula&lt;/i&gt; (W. Barnes & McDunnough, 1918) (not &lt;i&gt;Chlosyne palla&lt;/i&gt; (Boisduval, 1852)), &lt;i&gt;Cercyonis hypoleuca&lt;/i&gt; Hawks & J. Emmel, 1998 (not &lt;i&gt;Cercyonis sthenele&lt;/i&gt; (Boisduval, 1852)), &lt;i&gt;Cecropterus coyote&lt;/i&gt; (Skinner, 1892) and &lt;i&gt;Cecropterus nigrociliata&lt;/i&gt; (Mabille & Boullet, 1912) (not &lt;i&gt;Aethilla toxeus&lt;/i&gt; Plötz, 1882), &lt;i&gt;Aguna malia&lt;/i&gt; Evans, 1952 (not &lt;i&gt;Aguna megaeles&lt;/i&gt; (Mabille, 1888)), &lt;i&gt;Polygonus arizonensis&lt;/i&gt; (Skinner, 1911), &lt;i&gt;Polygonus histrio&lt;/i&gt; Röber, 1925, &lt;i&gt;Polygonus pallida&lt;/i&gt; Röber, 1925, and &lt;i&gt;Polygonus hagar&lt;/i&gt; Evans, 1952 (not &lt;i&gt;Polygonus leo&lt;/i&gt; (Gmelin, [1790])), &lt;i&gt;Viola kuma&lt;/i&gt; (Bell, 1942), &lt;b&gt;comb. nov.&lt;/b&gt; (not &lt;i&gt;Pachyneuria helena&lt;/i&gt; (Hayward, 1939)), &lt;i&gt;Tamela maura&lt;/i&gt; (Snellen, 1886) (not &lt;i&gt;Tamela othonias&lt;/i&gt; (Hewitson, 1878)), &lt;i&gt;Tamela diocles&lt;/i&gt; (Moore, [1866]) (not &lt;i&gt;Tamela nigrita&lt;/i&gt; (Latreille, [1824])), &lt;i&gt;Vinius phellus&lt;/i&gt; (Mabille, 1883) (not &lt;i&gt;Vinius exilis&lt;/i&gt; (Plötz, 1883)), &lt;i&gt;Vinius sophistes&lt;/i&gt; (Dyar, 1918) (not &lt;i&gt;Vinius tryhana&lt;/i&gt; (Kaye, 1914)), and &lt;i&gt;Rhinthon andricus&lt;/i&gt; (Mabille, 1895) and &lt;i&gt;Rhinthon aqua&lt;/i&gt; (Evans, 1955) (not &lt;i&gt;Rhinthon braesia&lt;/i&gt; (Hewitson, 1867)). The following are new and revised species-subspecies combinations: &lt;i&gt;Cercyonis sthenele damei&lt;/i&gt; W. Barnes & Benjamin, 1926 (not &lt;i&gt;Cercyonis meadii&lt;/i&gt; (W. H. Edwards, 1872)) and &lt;i&gt;Chlosyne flavula blackmorei&lt;/i&gt; Pelham, 2008 and &lt;i&gt;Chlosyne flavula calydon&lt;/i&gt; (W. Holland, 1931) (not &lt;i&gt;Chlosyne palla&lt;/i&gt;). The following are valid subspecies resurrected from","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934913/pdf/nihms-1871576.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10788600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neotype designation for Papilio fulgerator Walch, 1775 (Hesperiidae: Eudaminae). Papilio fulgerator Walch, 1775 (Hesperiidae: Eudaminae) 的新原型命名。
Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7272388
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Gerardo Lamas, Nick V Grishin

The discovery that a skipper butterfly Telegonus fulgerator (Walch, 1775), previously placed in the genus Astraptes Hübner, [1819], is a complex of many similar-looking species-level taxa with different COI barcodes, caterpillar foodplants and body patterns, and subtle differences in adult phenotypes raised a question about which species is the original T. fulgerator. To answer this question, being unable to locate its holotype, we designate the neotype of Papilio fulgerator Walch, 1775, a female specimen from Suriname in the Zoological State Collection, Munich, Germany. This neotype will form the foundation for a comprehensive revision of the T. fulgerator complex based on genomic sequencing and analysis augmented with phenotypic considerations.

我们发现,以前被归入Astraptes Hübner, [1819]属的跳蝶Telegonus fulgerator (Walch, 1775),是一个由许多长相相似的种级类群组成的复合体,这些类群具有不同的COI条形码、毛虫食性和体型,成虫表型也有细微差别。为了回答这个问题,在无法找到其主模式的情况下,我们将德国慕尼黑国家动物园收藏的一个来自苏里南的雌性标本命名为 Papilio fulgerator Walch, 1775 的新模式。该新模式将为基于基因组测序和分析并结合表型考虑对 T. fulgerator 复合体进行全面修订奠定基础。
{"title":"Neotype designation for <i>Papilio fulgerator</i> Walch, 1775 (Hesperiidae: Eudaminae).","authors":"Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Gerardo Lamas, Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7272388","DOIUrl":"10.5281/zenodo.7272388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discovery that a skipper butterfly <i>Telegonus fulgerator</i> (Walch, 1775), previously placed in the genus <i>Astraptes</i> Hübner, [1819], is a complex of many similar-looking species-level taxa with different COI barcodes, caterpillar foodplants and body patterns, and subtle differences in adult phenotypes raised a question about which species is the original <i>T. fulgerator</i>. To answer this question, being unable to locate its holotype, we designate the <b>neotype</b> of <i>Papilio fulgerator</i> Walch, 1775, a female specimen from Suriname in the Zoological State Collection, Munich, Germany. This neotype will form the foundation for a comprehensive revision of the <i>T. fulgerator</i> complex based on genomic sequencing and analysis augmented with phenotypic considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645580/pdf/nihms-1846940.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40477452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies. 蝴蝶的基因组分析使分类发现成为可能。
Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-07 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7160429
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Leina Song, Riley J Gott, Pierre Boyer, Crispin S Guppy, Steve Kohler, Gerardo Lamas, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin

The comparative genomics of butterflies yields additional insights into their phylogeny and classification that are compiled here. As a result, 3 genera, 5 subgenera, 5 species, and 3 subspecies are proposed as new, i.e., in Hesperiidae: Antina Grishin, gen. n. (type species Antigonus minor O. Mielke, 1980), Pompe Grishin and Lamas, gen. n. (type species Lerema postpuncta Draudt, 1923), and Curva Grishin, gen. n. (type species Moeris hyagnis Godman, 1900); in Lycaenidae: Fussia Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Polyommatus standfussi Grum-Grshimailo, 1891) and Pava Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Thecla panava Westwood, 1852); in Hesperiidae: Monoca Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Tagiades monophthalma Plötz, 1884), Putuma Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Tisias putumayo Constantino and Salazar, 2013), and Rayia Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Mastor perigenes Godman, 1900); Cissia wahala Grishin, sp. n. (Nymphalidae; type locality in Mexico: Oaxaca); in Hesperiidae: Hedone mira Grishin and Lamas, sp. n. (type locality in Peru: Apurímac), Vidius pompeoides Grishin, sp. n. (type locality in Brazil: Amazonas), Parphorus hermieri Grishin, sp. n. (Hesperiidae; type locality in Brazil: Rondônia), and Zenis par Grishin, sp. n. (Hesperiidae; type locality in Peru: Cuzco); in Pieridae: Glutophrissa drusilla noroesta Grishin, ssp. n. (type locality in USA: Texas, Cameron Co.) and Pieris marginalis siblanca Grishin, ssp. n. (type locality in USA: New Mexico, Lincoln Co.), and Argynnis cybele neomexicana Grishin, ssp. n. (Nymphalidae; type locality in USA: New Mexico, Sandoval Co.). Acidalia leto valesinoides-alba Reuss, [1926] and Acidalia nokomis valesinoides-alba Reuss, [1926] are unavailable names. Neotypes are designated for Mylothris margarita Hübner, [1825] (type locality in Brazil) and Papilio coras Cramer, 1775 (type locality becomes USA: Pennsylvania, Montgomery Co., Flourtown). Mylothris margarita Hübner, [1825] becomes a junior objective synonym of Pieris ilaire Godart, 1819, currently a junior subjective synonym of Glutophrissa drusilla (Cramer, 1777). Lectotypes are designated for Hesperia ceramica Plötz, 1886 (type locality in Indonesia: Seram Island), Pamphila trebius Mabille, 1891 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), Methionopsis modestus Godman, 1901 and Papias microsema Godman, 1900 (type locality in Mexico: Tabasco), Hesperia fusca Grote & Robinson, 1867 (type locality in USA: Georgia), Goniloba corusca Herrich-Schäffer, 1869, and Goniloba devanes Herrich-Schäffer, 1869; the type localities of the last two species, together with Pamphila st

蝴蝶的比较基因组学为蝴蝶的系统发育和分类提供了更多的见解。因此,在Hesperidae中提出了3属、5亚属、5种和3亚种,即:Antina Grishin,gen.n(模式种Antigonus minor O.Mielke,1980)、Pompe Grishin和Lamas,gen.n.(模式种Lerema postpuncta Draudt,1923)和Curva Grishin(模式种Moeris hyagnis Godman,1900);灰蝶科:灰蝶,亚属。n.(模式种Polyommatus standfussi Grum Grshimailo,1891)和Pava Grishin,亚属。n.(模式种Thecla panava Westwood,1852);在灰蝶科中:灰蝶,亚属。n.(模式种Tagiades monophalma Plötz,1884),Putuma Grishin,亚属。n.(模式种Tisias putumayo Constantino和Salazar,2013)和Rayia Grishin,亚属。n.(模式种Mastor perigenes Godman,1900);Cissia wahala Grishin,sp.n.(睡蝶科;墨西哥模式产地:瓦哈卡州);在Hesperidae中:Hedone mira Grishin和Lamas,sp.n(秘鲁模式产地:Apurímac)、Vidius pompeoides Grishin,sp.n.(巴西模式产地:Amazonas)、Parphorus hermieri Grishin;在粉蝶科中:北纹粉蝶,ssp。n.(美国典型地区:德克萨斯州,Cameron Co.)和Pieris边缘化了siblanca Grishin,ssp。n.(美国类型地区:新墨西哥州,林肯公司)和Argynnis cybele neomexicana Grishin,ssp。n.(睡蝶科;美国的模式产地:新墨西哥州,Sandoval公司)。Acidalia leto valesinoides alba Reuss,[1926]和Acidalia-nokomis valesinoises alba Reuss,[126]是不可用的名称。新类型被指定为Mylothris margarita Hübner,[1825](在巴西的类型地区)和Papilio coras Cramer,1775(类型地区变为美国:宾夕法尼亚州、蒙哥马利公司、弗洛敦)。Mylothris margarita Hübner,[1825]成为Pieris ilaire Godart,1819的初级客观同义词,目前是Glutophrisa drusilla的初级主观同义词(Cramer,1777)。Lectotype被指定为Hesperia ceramica Plötz,1886年(印度尼西亚类型地区:Seram岛),Pamphila trebius Mabille,1891年(哥伦比亚类型地区:波哥大),Methionopsis modestus Godman,1901年和Papias microsma Godman(墨西哥类型地区:Tabasco),Hesperia fusca Grote&Robinson,1867年(美国类型地区:乔治亚),Goniloba corusca Herrich Schäffer,1869年,和Goniloba devanes Herrich Schäffer,1869年;最后两个物种的模式位置,连同潘菲拉柱头Skinner,1896和Carystus(Argon)lota(Hewitson,1877),被推断为在南美洲。2020年,Junonia pacoma Grishin的典型地区位于锡那罗亚州,而不是索诺拉州(墨西哥)。腹部被排除在ascalon葡萄球菌的正模标本之外(Staudinger,1876)。此外,还提出了一些分类学上的变化。Alciphronia Koçak,1992被视为一个亚属,而不是Heodes Dalman,1816的同义词。以下属被视为亚属:Lafron Grishin,Lycaena〔Fabricius〕的2020,1807,Aremfoxia Real,Epityches D’Almeida的1971,1938,Pagyris Boisduval的Placidina D’Almelida,1928,1870,和Mnasinous Godman的Methionopsis Godman,1901,1900。Polites(Polites)coras(Cramer,1775)不是一个名词dubium,而是一个有效的物种。以下是物种级别的分类群(不是括号中给出的分类群的亚种或同义词):灰蝶(Lucas,1866)和次灰蝶(Boisduval,1852,thyridiana墓志铭(Haensch,1909),梳。nov.(不是Epitiches ferra Haensch,1909年,comb.nov.),Argynnis bischoffii W.H.Edwards,1870年(不是Argynnismormonia Boisduval,1869年),Argyn nis leto Behr,1862年(不是Agynnis cybele(Fabricius,1775年)),Boloria myrina(Cramer,1777年)(不是Boloria selene([Denis&Schifferüller],1775),Phyciodes jalapeno J.Scott,1998年(不是Phyciodes phaon(W.H.Edwards),1864年),Phyciodes incognitus Gatrelle,2004和Phyciodes diminutor J.Scott,1998(非Phyciodes-cocyta(Cramer,1777)),Phyciodes-orantain J.Scott,98(非Phycioodes-tharos(Drury,1773)),Phyciodes-anasazi J.Scott,1994(非Phyciodes-batesii(Reakirt,[1866])),Cercyonis silvestris(W.H.Edwards,1861)(非Cercyonis-sthenele(Boisduval,1852)),Paramacera allini L.Miller,1972和Paramacera rubrouffusa L.Miller,1972年(非西克副麻(Reakirt,[1867]))、陈氏茜草(R.Chermock,1949)、拟花茜草(L.Miller,1976)和合成茜草(L.Miller,1976年)(非红茜草(W.H。 Edwards,1871))、Tarsoctenus gaudialis(Hewitson,1876)(不是Tarsoctens corytus(Cramer,1777))、Nisoniades inca(Lindsey,192
{"title":"Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies.","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Cong,&nbsp;Jinhui Shen,&nbsp;Leina Song,&nbsp;Riley J Gott,&nbsp;Pierre Boyer,&nbsp;Crispin S Guppy,&nbsp;Steve Kohler,&nbsp;Gerardo Lamas,&nbsp;Paul A Opler,&nbsp;Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7160429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7160429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The comparative genomics of butterflies yields additional insights into their phylogeny and classification that are compiled here. As a result, 3 genera, 5 subgenera, 5 species, and 3 subspecies are proposed as new, i.e., in Hesperiidae: <i>Antina</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Antigonus minor</i> O. Mielke, 1980), <i>Pompe</i> Grishin and Lamas, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Lerema postpuncta</i> Draudt, 1923), and <i>Curva</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Moeris hyagnis</i> Godman, 1900); in Lycaenidae: <i>Fussia</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Polyommatus standfussi</i> Grum-Grshimailo, 1891) and <i>Pava</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Thecla panava</i> Westwood, 1852); in Hesperiidae: <i>Monoca</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Tagiades monophthalma</i> Plötz, 1884), <i>Putuma</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Tisias putumayo</i> Constantino and Salazar, 2013), and <i>Rayia</i> Grishin, <b>subgen. n.</b> (type species <i>Mastor perigenes</i> Godman, 1900); <i>Cissia wahala</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (Nymphalidae; type locality in Mexico: Oaxaca); in Hesperiidae: <i>Hedone mira</i> Grishin and Lamas, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Peru: Apurímac), <i>Vidius pompeoides</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Brazil: Amazonas), <i>Parphorus hermieri</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (Hesperiidae; type locality in Brazil: Rondônia), and <i>Zenis par</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (Hesperiidae; type locality in Peru: Cuzco); in Pieridae: <i>Glutophrissa drusilla noroesta</i> Grishin, <b>ssp. n.</b> (type locality in USA: Texas, Cameron Co.) and <i>Pieris marginalis siblanca</i> Grishin, <b>ssp. n.</b> (type locality in USA: New Mexico, Lincoln Co.), and <i>Argynnis cybele neomexicana</i> Grishin, <b>ssp. n.</b> (Nymphalidae; type locality in USA: New Mexico, Sandoval Co.). <i>Acidalia leto valesinoides-alba</i> Reuss, [1926] and <i>Acidalia nokomis valesinoides-alba</i> Reuss, [1926] are unavailable names. <b>Neotypes</b> are designated for <i>Mylothris margarita</i> Hübner, [1825] (type locality in Brazil) and <i>Papilio coras</i> Cramer, 1775 (type locality becomes USA: Pennsylvania, Montgomery Co., Flourtown). <i>Mylothris margarita</i> Hübner, [1825] becomes a junior objective synonym of <i>Pieris ilaire</i> Godart, 1819, currently a junior subjective synonym of <i>Glutophrissa drusilla</i> (Cramer, 1777). <b>Lectotypes</b> are designated for <i>Hesperia ceramica</i> Plötz, 1886 (type locality in Indonesia: Seram Island), <i>Pamphila trebius</i> Mabille, 1891 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), <i>Methionopsis modestus</i> Godman, 1901 and <i>Papias microsema</i> Godman, 1900 (type locality in Mexico: Tabasco), <i>Hesperia fusca</i> Grote & Robinson, 1867 (type locality in USA: Georgia), <i>Goniloba corusca</i> Herrich-Schäffer, 1869, and <i>Goniloba devanes</i> Herrich-Schäffer, 1869; the type localities of the last two species, together with <i>Pamphila st","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645532/pdf/nihms-1842990.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40465616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Genomic DNA sequencing reveals two new North American species of Staphylus (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae: Carcharodini). 基因组 DNA 测序揭示了两种北美新种 Staphylus(Hesperiidae: Pyrginae: Carcharodini)。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6510041
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Leina Song, Nick V Grishin

Two new skipper butterfly (Hesperiidae) species are described from the United States: Staphylus floridus Grishin, sp. n. (type locality in Florida, Volusia Co.) and Staphylus ecos Grishin, sp. n. (type locality in Texas, Brewster Co.). They are cryptic and hence escaped recognition. They differ from their sister species by the relative size and morphology of genitalia and by genotype-including and beyond the COI barcode-thus suggesting genetic isolation that argues for their species-level status. A lectotype is designated for Helias ascalaphus Staudinger, 1876. Staphylus opites (Godman & Salvin, 1896), stat. rest. is a species-level taxon and not a synonym of Staphylus vincula (Plötz, 1886), while Pholisora iguala Williams & Bell, 1940, syn. n. is a junior subjective synonym of S. vincula.

美国描述了两个新的蝶形目蝴蝶(Hesperiidae)物种:n. (type locality in Florida, Volusia Co.) 和 Staphylus ecos Grishin, sp. n. (type locality in Texas, Brewster Co.) 。它们很隐蔽,因此没有被发现。它们与姊妹种的不同之处在于生殖器的相对大小和形态以及基因型--包括 COI 条形码和 COI 条形码以外的基因型--这表明它们在遗传上是隔离的,这也证明了它们的种级地位。为 Helias ascalaphus Staudinger, 1876 指定了一个讲座模式。Staphylus opites (Godman & Salvin, 1896), stat. rest. 是种级分类群,不是 Staphylus vincula (Plötz, 1886) 的异名,而 Pholisora iguala Williams & Bell, 1940, syn. n. 是 S. vincula 的初级主观异名。
{"title":"Genomic DNA sequencing reveals two new North American species of <i>Staphylus</i> (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae: Carcharodini).","authors":"Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Leina Song, Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6510041","DOIUrl":"10.5281/zenodo.6510041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two new skipper butterfly (Hesperiidae) species are described from the United States: <i>Staphylus floridus</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Florida, Volusia Co.) and <i>Staphylus ecos</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n.</b> (type locality in Texas, Brewster Co.). They are cryptic and hence escaped recognition. They differ from their sister species by the relative size and morphology of genitalia and by genotype-including and beyond the COI barcode-thus suggesting genetic isolation that argues for their species-level status. A <b>lectotype</b> is designated for <i>Helias ascalaphus</i> Staudinger, 1876. <i>Staphylus opites</i> (Godman & Salvin, 1896), <b>stat. rest.</b> is a species-level taxon and not a synonym of <i>Staphylus vincula</i> (Plötz, 1886), while <i>Pholisora iguala</i> Williams & Bell, 1940, <b>syn. n.</b> is a junior subjective synonym of <i>S. vincula</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75088007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Checking the checkered taxonomy of Plötz's checkered skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrgini). 检查Plötz的格纹跳鱼的格纹分类(格纹跳鱼科:格纹跳鱼)。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6510282
Jing Zhang, Q. Cong, J. Burns, N. Grishin
We present an analysis of the names proposed by Carl Plötz in 1884 for the New World species in the genus Pyrgus Hübner, [1819] facilitated by the genomic sequencing of extant primary type specimens comparatively with a larger sample of more recently collected specimens of these species and their relatives. The changes to nomenclature suggested here are only caused by the identity of primary type specimens as revealed by their phenotypes or through genomic sequencing. All neotypes are designated to stabilize nomenclature in agreement with the current usage of these names, which in unison agrees best with the information available about them. Lectotypes are designated for the following 5 taxa: Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) bellatrix Plötz, 1884 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) willi Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Brazil: Minas Gerais), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) albescens Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Mexico), Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) lycurgus Plötz, 1884 (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico), and Pyrgus occidentalis Skinner, 1906 (type locality USA: Texas, San Antonio). Neotypes are designated for the following 4 taxa: Pyrgus (Pyrgus) adepta Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality Colombia: Bogota), Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) dion Plötz, 1884 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) adjutrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in Mexico: Nuevo Leon), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) insolatrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico). As a result, P. lycurgus and P. insolatrix are objective synonyms. The following are junior subjective synonyms: P. dion of Burnsius adepta (Plötz, 1884), Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) varus Plötz, 1884 of Burnsius orcus (Stoll, 1780) and P. adjutrix of Burnsius oileus (Linnaeus, 1767). Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) willi (Plötz, 1884) is a species-level taxon and not a subspecies of Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) domicella (Erichson, [1849])). Genomic analysis of the lectotypes of P. albescens, P. lycurgus, and P. occidentalis establishes them as conspecific with Burnsius communis (Grote, 1872), thus depriving a distinct species currently identified as Burnsius albescens from its name, that becomes a name for Burnsius communis albescens (Plötz, 1884) in accord with its lectotype identity; P. lycurgus and P. insolatrix are its junior subjective synonyms, but P. occidentalis is a junior subjective synonym of B. communis communis. A new name Burnsius albezens Grishin sp. n. (type locality USA: Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal) is proposed for the species misidentified as B. albescens. Furthermore, genomic comparisons reveal two other new species and one new subspecies of Burnsius Grishin, 2019: B. burnsi Grishin sp. n. (type locality Mexico: Veracruz, Huatusco), B. adepta inepta Grishin ssp. n. (type locality Ecuador: Pichincha, Tandapi), and B. orcynus Grishin sp. n. (type locality Curaçao: Hato Field) that are
我们对Carl Plötz在1884年提出的Pyrgus h bner属的新世界物种的名称进行了分析,[1819]通过对现存的初级模式标本进行基因组测序,并与最近收集的这些物种及其近亲的更大样本进行了比较。此处建议的命名变化仅是由于其表型或基因组测序所揭示的初级型标本的身份引起的。所有新类型都被指定为稳定的命名法,以符合这些名称的当前用法,这与有关它们的现有信息一致。为以下5个分类群指定了类型:Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) bellatrix Plötz, 1884(类型产地阿根廷:布宜诺斯艾利斯),Pyrgus (Pyrgus) willi Plötz, 1884(类型产地巴西:Minas Gerais), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) albescens Plötz, 1884(类型产地墨西哥),Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) lycurgus Plötz, 1884(类型产地“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部),和Pyrgus occidentalis Skinner, 1906(类型产地美国:德克萨斯州,圣安东尼奥)。新类型被指定为以下4个分类群:Pyrgus (Pyrgus) adepta Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.)(模式地点哥伦比亚:波哥大),Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) dion Plötz, 1884(模式地点哥伦比亚:波哥大),Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) adjutrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.)(模式地点墨西哥:Nuevo Leon), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) inderatrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.)(模式地点在“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部)。因此,石竹和石竹在客观上是同义的。以下是初级主观同义词:Burnsius adepta的P. dion (Plötz, 1884), Burnsius orcus (Stoll, 1780)的Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) varus Plötz, 1884和Burnsius oileus (Linnaeus, 1767)的P. adjutrix。Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) willi (Plötz, 1884)是Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) domicella的一个种级分类群,而不是亚种(Erichson,[1849])。对P. albescens、P. lycurgus和P. occidentalis的选集型进行基因组分析,确定它们与Burnsius communis (Grote, 1872)是同源的,从而剥夺了一个目前被确定为Burnsius albescens的独特物种的名称,根据其选集型身份成为Burnsius communis albescens的名称(Plötz, 1884);石竹和石竹是其初级主义同义,而西竹是石竹的初级主义同义。提出了一个新名称Burnsius albezens Grishin sp. n.(类型产地美国:Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal)。此外,基因组比较还发现了2019年Burnsius Grishin的另外两个新种和一个新亚种:B. burnsi Grishin sp. n.(类型地点墨西哥:Veracruz, Huatusco), B. adepta inepta Grishin ssp。B. orcynus Grishin sp. n.(型地厄瓜多尔:Pichincha, Tandapi)和B. orcynus Grishin sp. n.(型地curaao: Hato Field)是隐型的,只能通过其基因型确定。
{"title":"Checking the checkered taxonomy of Plötz's checkered skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrgini).","authors":"Jing Zhang, Q. Cong, J. Burns, N. Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6510282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6510282","url":null,"abstract":"We present an analysis of the names proposed by Carl Plötz in 1884 for the New World species in the genus Pyrgus Hübner, [1819] facilitated by the genomic sequencing of extant primary type specimens comparatively with a larger sample of more recently collected specimens of these species and their relatives. The changes to nomenclature suggested here are only caused by the identity of primary type specimens as revealed by their phenotypes or through genomic sequencing. All neotypes are designated to stabilize nomenclature in agreement with the current usage of these names, which in unison agrees best with the information available about them. Lectotypes are designated for the following 5 taxa: Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) bellatrix Plötz, 1884 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) willi Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Brazil: Minas Gerais), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) albescens Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Mexico), Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) lycurgus Plötz, 1884 (type locality in \"Central America\", likely southern Mexico), and Pyrgus occidentalis Skinner, 1906 (type locality USA: Texas, San Antonio). Neotypes are designated for the following 4 taxa: Pyrgus (Pyrgus) adepta Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality Colombia: Bogota), Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) dion Plötz, 1884 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), Pyrgus (Scelothrix [sic]) adjutrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in Mexico: Nuevo Leon), Pyrgus (Pyrgus) insolatrix Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in \"Central America\", likely southern Mexico). As a result, P. lycurgus and P. insolatrix are objective synonyms. The following are junior subjective synonyms: P. dion of Burnsius adepta (Plötz, 1884), Pyrgus (Syrichthus [sic]) varus Plötz, 1884 of Burnsius orcus (Stoll, 1780) and P. adjutrix of Burnsius oileus (Linnaeus, 1767). Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) willi (Plötz, 1884) is a species-level taxon and not a subspecies of Heliopetes (Heliopyrgus) domicella (Erichson, [1849])). Genomic analysis of the lectotypes of P. albescens, P. lycurgus, and P. occidentalis establishes them as conspecific with Burnsius communis (Grote, 1872), thus depriving a distinct species currently identified as Burnsius albescens from its name, that becomes a name for Burnsius communis albescens (Plötz, 1884) in accord with its lectotype identity; P. lycurgus and P. insolatrix are its junior subjective synonyms, but P. occidentalis is a junior subjective synonym of B. communis communis. A new name Burnsius albezens Grishin sp. n. (type locality USA: Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal) is proposed for the species misidentified as B. albescens. Furthermore, genomic comparisons reveal two other new species and one new subspecies of Burnsius Grishin, 2019: B. burnsi Grishin sp. n. (type locality Mexico: Veracruz, Huatusco), B. adepta inepta Grishin ssp. n. (type locality Ecuador: Pichincha, Tandapi), and B. orcynus Grishin sp. n. (type locality Curaçao: Hato Field) that are","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73526946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Two new species of Hermeuptychia from North America and three neotype designations (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). 来自北美洲的 Hermeuptychia 的两个新种和三个新原型(蛱蝶科:蝶形目)。
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5622602
Qian Cong, Eduardo P Barbosa, Mario A Marín, André V L Freitas, Gerardo Lamas, Nick V Grishin

Two new species of Hermeuptychia Forster, 1964 are described. Hermeuptychia sinuosa Grishin, sp. n. (type locality Guatemala: El Progreso, Morazán) is an isolated member of the genus that does not readily fit into known species groups, as suggested by its distinct male and female genitalia and COI DNA barcode sequences. It is distinguished from its congeners by prominently wavy submarginal lines, rounder wings and distinctive genitalia, and can typically be identified by a white dot, instead of an eyespot, near the ventral hindwing apex. Hermeuptychia occidentalis Grishin, sp. n. (type locality Mexico: Guerrero, Acapulco) belongs to the Hermeuptychia sosybius group as indicated by the presence of androconia on the dorsal surface of the wings, genitalia and COI DNA barcodes, and in addition to DNA characters, differs from its relatives in the shape of the uncus and female genitalia. Neotypes of Oreas strigata canthe Hübner, [1811] (type locality Suriname: Gelderland, Suriname River), Megisto acmenis Hübner, 1823 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), and Satyrus cantheus Godart, [1824] (type locality USA: Florida, Pinellas Co., St. Petersburg) and lectotype of Euptychia celmis var. bonaërensis [sic] Burmeister, 1878 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires) are designated. These designations establish Hermeuptychia canthe as a valid species widely distributed in South America from Colombia to Bolivia and Southeast Brazil, Euptychia celmis var. bonaërensis [sic] Burmeister, 1878 as a junior objective synonym of Yphthimoides acmenis, and S. cantheus as a junior subjective synonym of Hermeuptychia sosybius (Fabricius, 1793). Papilio camerta Cramer, 1780 is treated as nomen dubium requiring further studies to determine an identity that is consistent with the original description, as it may be conspecific with Paryphthimoides poltys (Prittwitz, 1865) instead of being a Hermeuptychia species as currently assumed.

描述了 Hermeuptychia Forster, 1964 的两个新种。Hermeuptychia sinuosa Grishin, sp. n.(模式产地:危地马拉:El Progreso, Morazán)是该属的一个孤立成员,其独特的雌雄生殖器和 COI DNA 条形码序列表明,它不容易归入已知种群。它与同类的区别在于明显的波浪状近缘线、更圆的翅膀和独特的生殖器,通常可以通过后翅腹侧先端附近的白点(而不是眼点)来识别。Hermeuptychia occidentalis Grishin,sp. n.(模式产地墨西哥:格雷罗州,阿卡普尔科)属于 Hermeuptychia sosybius 类,其翅膀背面、生殖器和 COI DNA 条形码上都有 androconia。Oreas strigata canthe Hübner, [1811] (模式产地苏里南:Gelderland,苏里南河)、Megisto acmenis Hübner, 1823 (模式产地阿根廷:布宜诺斯艾利斯)和 Satyrus cantheus Godart, [1824] (模式产地美国:佛罗里达州,Pinellas Co、bonaërensis [sic] Burmeister, 1878(模式产地阿根廷:布宜诺斯艾利斯)的 lectotype。cantheus 是 Hermeuptychia sosybius (Fabricius, 1793) 的初级主观异名。Papilio camerta Cramer, 1780 被视为疑名,需要进一步研究以确定与原始描述一致的身份,因为它可能与 Paryphthimoides poltys(Prittwitz, 1865)同种,而不是目前假设的 Hermeuptychia 种。
{"title":"Two new species of <i>Hermeuptychia</i> from North America and three neotype designations (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae).","authors":"Qian Cong, Eduardo P Barbosa, Mario A Marín, André V L Freitas, Gerardo Lamas, Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5622602","DOIUrl":"10.5281/zenodo.5622602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two new species of <i>Hermeuptychia</i> Forster, 1964 are described. <i>Hermeuptychia sinuosa</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n</b>. (type locality Guatemala: El Progreso, Morazán) is an isolated member of the genus that does not readily fit into known species groups, as suggested by its distinct male and female genitalia and COI DNA barcode sequences. It is distinguished from its congeners by prominently wavy submarginal lines, rounder wings and distinctive genitalia, and can typically be identified by a white dot, instead of an eyespot, near the ventral hindwing apex. <i>Hermeuptychia occidentalis</i> Grishin, <b>sp. n</b>. (type locality Mexico: Guerrero, Acapulco) belongs to the <i>Hermeuptychia sosybius</i> group as indicated by the presence of androconia on the dorsal surface of the wings, genitalia and COI DNA barcodes, and in addition to DNA characters, differs from its relatives in the shape of the uncus and female genitalia. Neotypes of <i>Oreas strigata canthe</i> Hübner, [1811] (type locality Suriname: Gelderland, Suriname River), <i>Megisto acmenis</i> Hübner, 1823 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), and <i>Satyrus cantheus</i> Godart, [1824] (type locality USA: Florida, Pinellas Co., St. Petersburg) and lectotype of <i>Euptychia celmis</i> var. <i>bonaërensis</i> [sic] Burmeister, 1878 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires) are designated. These designations establish <i>Hermeuptychia canthe</i> as a valid species widely distributed in South America from Colombia to Bolivia and Southeast Brazil, <i>Euptychia celmis</i> var. <i>bonaërensis</i> [sic] Burmeister, 1878 as a junior objective synonym of <i>Yphthimoides acmenis</i>, and <i>S. cantheus</i> as a junior subjective synonym of <i>Hermeuptychia sosybius</i> (Fabricius, 1793). <i>Papilio camerta</i> Cramer, 1780 is treated as <i>nomen dubium</i> requiring further studies to determine an identity that is consistent with the original description, as it may be conspecific with <i>Paryphthimoides poltys</i> (Prittwitz, 1865) instead of being a <i>Hermeuptychia</i> species as currently assumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601677/pdf/nihms-1755031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39645860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genomics-guided refinement of butterfly taxonomy. 以基因组学为指导完善蝴蝶分类学。
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-29 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5630311
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin

Continuing with comparative genomic exploration of worldwide butterfly fauna, we use all protein-coding genes as they are retrieved from the whole genome shotgun sequences for phylogeny construction. Analysis of these genome-scale phylogenies projected onto the taxonomic classification and the knowledge about butterfly phenotypes suggests further refinements of butterfly taxonomy that are presented here. As a general rule, we assign most prominent clades of similar genetic differentiation to the same taxonomic rank, and use criteria based on relative population diversification and the extent of gene exchange for species delimitation. As a result, 7 tribes, 4 subtribes, 14 genera, and 9 subgenera are proposed as new, i.e., in subfamily Pierinae Swainson, 1820: Calopierini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Calopieris Aurivillius, 1898); in subfamily Riodininae Grote, 1895: Callistiumini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Callistium Stichel, 1911); in subfamily Nymphalinae Rafinesque, 1815: Pycinini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Pycina Doubleday 1849), Rhinopalpini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Rhinopalpa C. & R. Felder 1860), Kallimoidini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Kallimoides Shirôzu & Nakanishi 1984), Vanessulini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Vanessula Dewitz 1887), and Doleschalliaini Grishin, trib. n. (type genus Doleschallia C. & R. Felder 1860); in tribe Mesosemiini Bates, 1859: Eunogyrina Grishin, subtrib. n. (type genus Eunogyra Westwood, 1851); in tribe Satyrini Boisduval, 1833: Callerebiina Grishin, subtrib. n. (type genus Callerebia Butler, 1867), Gyrocheilina Grishin, subtrib. n. (type genus Gyrocheilus Butler, 1867), and Calistina Grishin, subtrib. n. (type genus Calisto Hübner, [1823]); in subfamily Euselasiinae Kirby, 1871: Pelolasia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Eurygona pelor Hewitson, [1853]), Myselasia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Eurygona mys Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]), Eurylasia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Eurygona euryone Hewitson, 1856), Maculasia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Euselasia albomaculiga Callaghan, 1999), and Eugelasia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Eurygona eugeon Hewitson, 1856); in subtribe Mesosemiina Bates, 1859: Ectosemia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Papilio eumene Cramer, 1776) and Endosemia Grishin, gen. n. (type species Papilio ulrica Cramer, 1777); in tribe Symmachiini Reuter, 1896: Tigria Grishin, gen. n. (type species Mesene xypete Hewitson, 1870) and Asymma Grishin, gen. n. (type species Symmachia virgatula Stichel, 1910); in tribe Riodinini Grote, 1895: Putridivora Grishin, gen. n. (type species Charis argyrea Bates, 1868), C

以下分类群最好作为亚属处理:Zegris Boisduval, 1836 of Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833]; Baltia Moore, 1878 and Pontieuchloia Verity, 1929 of Pontia [Fabricius], 1807;Phrissura Butler, 1870 of Appias Hübner, [1819]; Saletara Distant, 1885 of Catophaga Hübner, 1819; Leodonta Butler, 1870 of Pereute Herrich-Schäffer, 1867; Takashia M.Okano & T.& R. Felder, 1865; Mesenopsis Godman & Salvin, 1886 and Xenandra C. & R. Felder, 1865 of Symmachia Hübner, [1819]; Pirascca J. Hall & Willmott, 1996 of Pterographium Stichel, 1910; Imelda Hewitson, 1870 of Echenais Hübner, [1819]; Calicosama J.Hall & Harvey, 2001 of Behemothia Hall, 2000; Polygrapha Staudinger, 1887 and Fountainea Rydon, 1971 of Anaea Hübner, [1819]; Siderone Hübner, [1823] and Phantos Dias, 2018 of Zaretis Hübner, [1819];Harsiesis Fruhstorfer, 1911 of Platypthima Rothschild & Jordan, 1905; Vila Kirby, 1871 of Biblis Fabricius, 1807; Diaethria Billberg, 1820 and Perisama Doubleday, 1849 of Callicore Hübner, [1819]; Antigonis C.Felder,1861 年的 Haematera Doubleday,1849 年;Asterope Hübner,[1819 年],Nica Hübner,[1826 年],Peria Kirby,1871 年和 Callicorina Smart,1976 年的 Temenis Hübner,[1819 年];Anthanassa Scudder, 1875, Castilia Higgins, 1981, Telenassa Higgins, 1981, Dagon Higgins, 1981, and Janatella Higgins, 1981 of Eresia Boisduval, 1836; and Wallengrenia Berg, 1897 of Polites Scudder, 1872.以下分类群为初级主观异名:Maniolina Grote,1897 of Erebiina Tutt,1896;Melanargiina Wheeler,1903 of Satyrina Boisduval,1833;Phyciodina Higgins,1981 of Melitaeina Herrich-Schäffer,1843;Cunizza Grote,1900 of Hesperocharis C.菲尔德,1862 年;Pontia [Fabricius] 的 Reliquia Ackery,1975 年;Tatochila A. Butler,1870 年;Piercolias Staudinger,1894 年;Hypsochila Ureta,1955 年;Theochila W. D. Field,1958 年;Pierphias Staudinger,1894 年。D. Field, 1958, Pierphulia W. D. Field, 1958, and Infraphulia W. D. Field, 1958 of Phulia Herrich-Schäffer, 1867; Mesapia Gray, 1856 of Aporia Hübner, [1819]; Catasticta Butler, 1870 of Archonias Hübner, 1827; Sandia Clench & P. Ehrlich, 1960 andX.Ehrlich, 1960 and Xamia Clench, 1961 of Incisalia Scudder, 1872; Hades Westwood, 1851 of Methone Doubleday, 1847; Semomesia Westwood, 1851, Mesophthalma Westwood, 1851, Perophthalma Westwood, 1851 and Leucochimona Stichel, 1909 of Mesosemia Hübner, [1819], Xynias Hewitson, 1874 of Mesenopsis Godman & Salvin, 1886; Stichelia J. Zikán, 1949 of Symmias Hübner.Zikán, 1949 of Symmachia Hübner, [1819]; Chimastrum Godman & Salvin, 1886 of Mesene Doubleday, 1847; Alethea Nielsen & Salazar, [2018] of Pirascca J. Hall & Willmott, 1996; Panaropsis J. Hall, 2002 of Pterographium.Hall, 2002 of Pterographium Stichel, 1910; Comphotis Stichel, 1910 of Phaenochitonia Stichel, 1910; Colaciticus Stichel, 1910 of Baeotis Hübner, [1819];Nahida Kirby,1871 年的 Ithomeis Bates,1862 年;Machaya Hall & Willmott,1995 年的 Pachythone Bates,1868 年;Percnodaimon Butler,1876 年和 Erebiola Fereday,1879 年的 Argyrophenga Doubleday,1845 年;Hestinalis Bryk, 193
{"title":"Genomics-guided refinement of butterfly taxonomy.","authors":"Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5630311","DOIUrl":"10.5281/zenodo.5630311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuing with comparative genomic exploration of worldwide butterfly fauna, we use all protein-coding genes as they are retrieved from the whole genome shotgun sequences for phylogeny construction. Analysis of these genome-scale phylogenies projected onto the taxonomic classification and the knowledge about butterfly phenotypes suggests further refinements of butterfly taxonomy that are presented here. As a general rule, we assign most prominent clades of similar genetic differentiation to the same taxonomic rank, and use criteria based on relative population diversification and the extent of gene exchange for species delimitation. As a result, 7 tribes, 4 subtribes, 14 genera, and 9 subgenera are proposed as new, i.e., in subfamily Pierinae Swainson, 1820: Calopierini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Calopieris</i> Aurivillius, 1898); in subfamily Riodininae Grote, 1895: Callistiumini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Callistium</i> Stichel, 1911); in subfamily Nymphalinae Rafinesque, 1815: Pycinini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Pycina</i> Doubleday 1849), Rhinopalpini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Rhinopalpa</i> C. & R. Felder 1860), Kallimoidini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Kallimoides</i> Shirôzu & Nakanishi 1984), Vanessulini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Vanessula</i> Dewitz 1887), and Doleschalliaini Grishin, <b>trib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Doleschallia</i> C. & R. Felder 1860); in tribe Mesosemiini Bates, 1859: <i>Eunogyrina</i> Grishin, <b>subtrib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Eunogyra</i> Westwood, 1851); in tribe Satyrini Boisduval, 1833: Callerebiina Grishin, <b>subtrib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Callerebia</i> Butler, 1867), Gyrocheilina Grishin, <b>subtrib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Gyrocheilus</i> Butler, 1867), and Calistina Grishin, <b>subtrib. n.</b> (type genus <i>Calisto</i> Hübner, [1823]); in subfamily Euselasiinae Kirby, 1871: <i>Pelolasia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Eurygona pelor</i> Hewitson, [1853]), <i>Myselasia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Eurygona mys</i> Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]), <i>Eurylasia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Eurygona euryone</i> Hewitson, 1856), <i>Maculasia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Euselasia albomaculiga</i> Callaghan, 1999), and <i>Eugelasia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Eurygona eugeon</i> Hewitson, 1856); in subtribe Mesosemiina Bates, 1859: <i>Ectosemia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Papilio eumene</i> Cramer, 1776) and <i>Endosemia</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Papilio ulrica</i> Cramer, 1777); in tribe Symmachiini Reuter, 1896: <i>Tigria</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Mesene xypete</i> Hewitson, 1870) and <i>Asymma</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Symmachia virgatula</i> Stichel, 1910); in tribe Riodinini Grote, 1895: <i>Putridivora</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Charis argyrea</i> Bates, 1868), <i>C","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794009/pdf/nihms-1724223.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39873887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names. 基因组证据表明蝴蝶的名字有进一步的变化。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-06
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin

Further genomic sequencing of butterflies by our research group expanding the coverage of species and specimens from different localities, coupled with genome-scale phylogenetic analysis and complemented by phenotypic considerations, suggests a number of changes to the names of butterflies, mostly those recorded from the United States and Canada. Here, we present evidence to support these changes. The changes are intended to make butterfly classification more internally consistent at the genus, subgenus and species levels. I.e., considering all available evidence, we attempt to assign similar taxonomic ranks to the clades of comparable genetic differentiation, which on average is correlated with the age of phylogenetic groups estimated from trees. For species, we use criteria devised by genomic analysis of the genetic differentiation across suture zones and comparison of sympatric populations of closely related species. As a result, we resurrect 4 genera and 1 subgenus from subgeneric status or synonymy, change the rank of 8 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 7 genus-group names, summarize evidence to support 19 taxa as species instead of subspecies and 1 taxon as subspecies instead of species, along with a number of additional changes. One new genus and one new subspecies are described. Namely, the following taxa are treated as genera Tharsalea Scudder, 1876, Helleia Verity, 1943, Apangea Zhdanko, 1995, and Boldenaria Zhdanko, 1995. Tetracharis Grote, 1898 is a valid subgenus (not a synonym of Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833]) that consists of Anthocharis cethura C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (Müller, 1764), Anthocharis midea (Hübner, [1809]), and Anthocharis limonea (A. Butler, 1871). The following are subgenera: Speyeria Scudder, 1872 of Argynnis Fabricius, 1807; Aglais Dalman, 1816 and Polygonia Hübner, [1819] of Nymphalis Kluk, 1780; Palaeonympha Butler, 1871 of Megisto Hübner, [1819]; Hyponephele Muschamp, 1915 of Cercyonis Scudder, 1875; Pyronia Hübner, [1819] and Aphantopus Wallengren, 1853 of Maniola Schrank, 1801 and Pseudonymphidia Callaghan, 1985 of Pachythone. Lafron Grishin, gen. n. (type species Papilio orus Stoll, [1780], parent subfamily Lycaeninae [Leach], [1815]) is described. Dipsas japonica Murray, 1875 is fixed as the type species of Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942. The following taxa are junior subjective synonyms: Falcapica Klots, 1930 of Tetracharis Grote, 1898; Habrodais Scudder, 1876, Favonius Sibatani & Ito, 1942, Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942, Quercusia Verity, 1943, Chrysozephyrus Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956, and Sibataniozephyrus Inomata, 1986 of Hypaurotis Scudder, 1876; Plesioarida Trujano & García, 2018 of R

我们的研究小组进一步对蝴蝶进行了基因组测序,扩大了来自不同地区的物种和标本的覆盖范围,加上基因组尺度的系统发育分析和表型考虑,表明蝴蝶的名称发生了一些变化,主要是来自美国和加拿大的记录。在这里,我们提供证据来支持这些变化。这些变化是为了使蝴蝶的分类在属、亚属和种的水平上更加内部一致。也就是说,考虑到所有可用的证据,我们试图将相似的分类等级分配给具有可比遗传分化的进化枝,这平均与从树木中估计的系统发生群的年龄相关。对于物种,我们使用的标准是通过对缝合带遗传分化的基因组分析和对近亲物种的同域种群的比较设计的。因此,我们将4个属和1个亚属从亚属状态或同义状态中复活,将8个目前使用的属级改为亚属,将7个属群名称同义化,总结了支持19个分类群为种而不是亚种,1个分类群为亚种而不是种的证据,以及一些其他变化。描述了一个新属和一个新亚种。即,以下分类群被视为Tharsalea Scudder属(1876),Helleia Verity属(1943),Apangea Zhdanko属(1995)和Boldenaria Zhdanko属(1995)。Tetracharis Grote, 1898是一个有效的亚属(不是Anthocharis Boisduval的同义词,Rambur, [dumnil] & Graslin,[1833]),由Anthocharis cethura C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (m<s:1> ller, 1764), Anthocharis midea (h<s:1> bner,[1809])和Anthocharis limonea (a . Butler, 1871)组成。以下为亚属:银腹蛇属(Argynnis Fabricius), 1872;Aglais Dalman, 1816和Polygonia h<e:1> bner, [1819] of nyphalis Kluk, 1780;Megisto h<e:1> bner的Palaeonympha Butler, 1871, [1819];斯卡德尔,1875年;Pyronia h<e:1> bner,[1819]和Aphantopus Wallengren, 1853 of Maniola Schrank, 1801 and Pseudonymphidia Callaghan, 1985 of Pachythone。描述了Lafron Grishin, gen. n.(模式种Papilio orus Stoll,[1780],亲本Lycaeninae亚科[Leach],[1815])。Dipsas japonica Murray, 1875年被确定为Neozephyrus Sibatani和Ito, 1942年的模式种。以下分类群为初级主观同义词:Falcapica Klots, 1930 of Tetracharis Grote, 1898;Habrodais Scudder, 1876年,Favonius Sibatani & Ito, 1942年,Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942年,Quercusia Verity, 1943年,Chrysozephyrus Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956年,以及Hypaurotis Scudder, 1986年的Sibataniozephyrus Inomata;Plesioarida Trujano & García, 2018 of Roeberella Strand, 1932;Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794)中的Papilio temenes Godart, 1819年(此处指定的选种),Argynnis hesperis tetonia (dos Passos & Grey, 1945)中的Speyeria hydaspe conquista dos Passos & Grey, 1945)和Phocides polybius polybius (Fabricius, 1793)中的Erycides imbreus Plötz, 1879年。以下是修订后的属种组合:Pachythone lencates (Hewitson, 1875) Pachythone小叶(br<s:1> vignon & Gallard, 1993)、Pachythone flocus (br<s:1> vignon, 2013)、Pachythone heberti (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007)、Pachythone marajoara (P. Jauffret & J. Jauffret, 2007)和Cissia cleophes (Godman & Salvin, 1889)。以下物种在亚属之间转移:Anthocharis lanceolata Lucas, 1852属于Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur, [dum<s:1>] & Graslin,[1833]而不是Paramidea Kuznetsov, 1929; Danaus eresimus (Cramer, 1777)属于Danaus Kluk, 1780,而不是ananosia h<e:1> bner, 1816。下列分类群是不同的种,而不是亚种(括号内所示的种的分类群):Heraclides ponceana (Schaus, 1911)(不是Heraclides aristodemus (Esper, 1794)), Colias elis Strecker, 1885(不是Colias meadii W. H. Edwards, 1871), Argynnis irene Boisduval, 1869和Argynnis nausicaa W. H. Edwards, 1874(不是Argynnis hesperis W. H. Edwards, 1864),加利福尼亚Westwood,[1851](不是conenonympha tullia (m<s:1> ller, 1764)), Dione incarnata N. Riley, 1926(不是Dione vanillae (Linnaeus, 1758)), coronado (M. Smith & Brock, 1988)(不是closyne fulvia (W. H. Edwards),1879)), Chlosyne chinatiensis (Tinkham, 1944)(不是Chlosyne theona (Menetries, 1855)), Phocides lilea (Reakirt[1867])(不是Phocides多样蟹属(腔上囊,1
{"title":"Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names.","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Cong,&nbsp;Jinhui Shen,&nbsp;Paul A Opler,&nbsp;Nick V Grishin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Further genomic sequencing of butterflies by our research group expanding the coverage of species and specimens from different localities, coupled with genome-scale phylogenetic analysis and complemented by phenotypic considerations, suggests a number of changes to the names of butterflies, mostly those recorded from the United States and Canada. Here, we present evidence to support these changes. The changes are intended to make butterfly classification more internally consistent at the genus, subgenus and species levels. I.e., considering all available evidence, we attempt to assign similar taxonomic ranks to the clades of comparable genetic differentiation, which on average is correlated with the age of phylogenetic groups estimated from trees. For species, we use criteria devised by genomic analysis of the genetic differentiation across suture zones and comparison of sympatric populations of closely related species. As a result, we resurrect 4 genera and 1 subgenus from subgeneric status or synonymy, change the rank of 8 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 7 genus-group names, summarize evidence to support 19 taxa as species instead of subspecies and 1 taxon as subspecies instead of species, along with a number of additional changes. One new genus and one new subspecies are described. Namely, the following taxa are treated as genera <i>Tharsalea</i> Scudder, 1876, <i>Helleia</i> Verity, 1943, <i>Apangea</i> Zhdanko, 1995, and <i>Boldenaria</i> Zhdanko, 1995. <i>Tetracharis</i> Grote, 1898 is a valid subgenus (not a synonym of <i>Anthocharis</i> Boisduval, Rambur, [Duménil] & Graslin, [1833]) that consists of <i>Anthocharis cethura</i> C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (Müller, 1764), <i>Anthocharis midea</i> (Hübner, [1809]), and <i>Anthocharis limonea</i> (A. Butler, 1871). The following are subgenera: <i>Speyeria</i> Scudder, 1872 of <i>Argynnis</i> Fabricius, 1807; <i>Aglais</i> Dalman, 1816 and <i>Polygonia</i> Hübner, [1819] of <i>Nymphalis</i> Kluk, 1780; <i>Palaeonympha</i> Butler, 1871 of <i>Megisto</i> Hübner, [1819]; <i>Hyponephele</i> Muschamp, 1915 of <i>Cercyonis</i> Scudder, 1875; <i>Pyronia</i> Hübner, [1819] and <i>Aphantopus</i> Wallengren, 1853 of <i>Maniola</i> Schrank, 1801 and <i>Pseudonymphidia</i> Callaghan, 1985 of <i>Pachythone. Lafron</i> Grishin, <b>gen. n.</b> (type species <i>Papilio orus</i> Stoll, [1780], parent subfamily <i>Lycaeninae</i> [Leach], [1815]) is described. <i>Dipsas japonica</i> Murray, 1875 is fixed as the type species of <i>Neozephyrus</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942. The following taxa are junior subjective synonyms: <i>Falcapica</i> Klots, 1930 of <i>Tetracharis</i> Grote, 1898; <i>Habrodais</i> Scudder, 1876, <i>Favonius</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942, <i>Neozephyrus</i> Sibatani & Ito, 1942, <i>Quercusia</i> Verity, 1943, <i>Chrysozephyrus</i> Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956, and <i>Sibataniozephyrus</i> Inomata, 1986 of <i>Hypaurotis</i> Scudder, 1876; <i>Plesioarida</i> Trujano & García, 2018 of <i>R","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794283/pdf/nihms-1724227.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39873885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes to North American butterfly names. 北美蝴蝶名称的变化。
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-05
Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Paul A Opler, Nick V Grishin

We obtained and analyzed whole genome shotgun sequences of all 845 species of butterflies recorded from Canada and the United States. Genome-scale phylogenetic trees constructed from the data reveal several non-monophyletic genera and suggest improved classification of species included in these genera. Here, these changes are formalized and 2 subgenera are described: Amblyteria Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Goniloba exoteria Herrich-Schäffer, 1869, parent genus Amblyscirtes Scudder, 1872), and Coa Grishin, subgen. n. (type species Hesperia baracoa Lucas, 1857, parent genus Polites Scudder, 1872). Furthermore, we resurrect 3 genera and 2 subgenera from synonymy, change the rank of 6 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 2 genera, transfer 3 (2 resurrected) subgenera and 11 additional species to different genera than those these taxa were assigned to, and raise one name from synonym to species rank. Namely, Hedone Scudder, 1872 and Limochores Scudder, 1872 are valid genera and not synonyms of Polites Scudder, 1872; Pendantus K. Johnson & Kroenlein, 1993 is a valid genus and not a synonym of Electrostrymon Clench, 1961; and Sphaenogona Butler, 1870 and Lucidia Lacordaire, 1833 are valid subgenera of Abaeis Hübner, [1819] (new placement) and not synonyms of Eurema Hübner, [1819]. The following taxa are best treated as subgenera: Mimoides Brown, 1991 of Eurytides Hübner, [1821] (sensu lato); Philotiella Mattoni, [1978] of Euphilotes Mattoni, [1978]; Neominois Scudder, 1875 of Oeneis Hübner, [1819]; Agraulis Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of Dione Hübner, [1819]; Copaeodes Speyer, 1877 of Oarisma Scudder, 1872; and Problema Skinner & R. Williams, 1924 of Atrytone Scudder, 1872. Phaeostrymon Clench, 1961 and Saliana Evans, 1955 are junior subjective synonyms of Satyrium Scudder, 1876 and Calpodes Hübner, [1819], respectively. The entire subgenus Erynnides Burns, 1964 is transferred from Erynnis Schrank, 1801 to Gesta Evans, 1953. New genus-species combinations resulting from transfer of species between genera are: Nastra perigenes (Godman, 1900) (not Vidius Evans, 1955); Troyus fantasos (Cramer, 1780), Troyus onaca (Evans, 1955), Troyus aurelius (Plötz, 1882), Troyus marcus (Fabricius, 1787), Troyus diversa (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), and Troyus drova (Evans, 1955) (not Vettius Godman, 1901); Oligoria percosius (Godman, 1900), Oligoria rindgei (H. Freeman, 1969), Oligoria lucifer (Hübner, [1831]), and Oligoria mustea (H. Freeman, 1979) (not Decinea Evans, 1955). Urbanus alva Evans, 1952 is a valid species and not a synonym of Urbanus belli (Hayward, 1935), new status.

我们获得并分析了从加拿大和美国记录的所有845种蝴蝶的全基因组鸟枪序列。基于这些数据构建的基因组级系统发育树揭示了几个非单系属,并建议改进这些属中包含的物种分类。在这里,这些变化是形式化的,并描述了2个亚属:Amblyteria Grishin亚属。n.(模式种Goniloba exoteria Herrich-Schäffer, 1869年,亲本属Amblyscirtes Scudder, 1872年)和Coa Grishin,亚属。n.(模式种黑桃,1857年,亲本属黑桃,1872年)。此外,我们还从同属中复活了3个属和2个亚属,将目前使用的6个属改为亚属,对2个属进行同义化,将3个(2个复活的)亚属和11个额外的种转移到不同的属中,并将一个名字从同属提升到种级。即Hedone Scudder, 1872年和limo杂务Scudder, 1872年是有效的属而不是Polites Scudder, 1872年的同义词;Pendantus K. Johnson & Kroenlein, 1993是一个有效属,而不是Electrostrymon Clench, 1961的同义词;和Sphaenogona Butler(1870)和Lucidia Lacordaire(1833)是Abaeis h bner[1819]的有效亚属,而不是Eurema h bner[1819]的同义词。以下分类群最好作为亚属处理:Mimoides Brown, 1991 of Eurytides h bner, [1821] (sensu lato);Philotiella Mattoni [1978]; Euphilotes Mattoni, [1978];Neominois Scudder, 1875 of Oeneis h bner, [1819];Agraulis Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of Dione h bner, [1819];coaeodes Speyer, 1877; Oarisma Scudder, 1872;斯金纳和威廉姆斯,1924年;斯卡德尔,1872年。Phaeostrymon Clench(1961)和Saliana Evans(1955)分别是Satyrium Scudder(1876)和Calpodes h bner(1819)的初级主观同义词。整个Erynnides Burns亚属(1964)从Erynnis Schrank(1801)转移到Gesta Evans(1953)。由属间物种转移而产生的新属种组合有:Nastra perigenes (Godman, 1900)(不是Vidius Evans, 1955);幻想特洛伊(克莱默,1780年)、onaca特洛伊(埃文斯,1955年)、aurelius特洛伊(Plötz, 1882年)、marcus特洛伊(法布里修斯,1787年)、diversa特洛伊(Herrich-Schäffer, 1869年)和drova特洛伊(埃文斯,1955年)(非Vettius Godman, 1901年);Oligoria percosius (Godman, 1900), Oligoria rindgei (H. Freeman, 1969), Oligoria lucifer (h bner,[1831])和Oligoria mustea (H. Freeman, 1979)(不是Decinea Evans, 1955)。Urbanus alva Evans, 1952是一种有效种,而不是Urbanus belli的同义词(Hayward, 1935),新地位。
{"title":"Changes to North American butterfly names.","authors":"Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Cong,&nbsp;Jinhui Shen,&nbsp;Paul A Opler,&nbsp;Nick V Grishin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We obtained and analyzed whole genome shotgun sequences of all 845 species of butterflies recorded from Canada and the United States. Genome-scale phylogenetic trees constructed from the data reveal several non-monophyletic genera and suggest improved classification of species included in these genera. Here, these changes are formalized and 2 subgenera are described: <i>Amblyteria</i> Grishin, subgen. n. (type species <i>Goniloba exoteria</i> Herrich-Schäffer, 1869, parent genus <i>Amblyscirtes</i> Scudder, 1872), and <i>Coa</i> Grishin, subgen. n. (type species <i>Hesperia baracoa</i> Lucas, 1857, parent genus <i>Polites</i> Scudder, 1872). Furthermore, we resurrect 3 genera and 2 subgenera from synonymy, change the rank of 6 currently used genera to subgenus, synonymize 2 genera, transfer 3 (2 resurrected) subgenera and 11 additional species to different genera than those these taxa were assigned to, and raise one name from synonym to species rank. Namely, <i>Hedone</i> Scudder, 1872 and <i>Limochores</i> Scudder, 1872 are valid genera and not synonyms of <i>Polites</i> Scudder, 1872; <i>Pendantus</i> K. Johnson & Kroenlein, 1993 is a valid genus and not a synonym of <i>Electrostrymon</i> Clench, 1961; and <i>Sphaenogona</i> Butler, 1870 and <i>Lucidia</i> Lacordaire, 1833 are valid subgenera of <i>Abaeis</i> Hübner, [1819] (new placement) and not synonyms of <i>Eurema</i> Hübner, [1819]. The following taxa are best treated as subgenera: <i>Mimoides</i> Brown, 1991 of <i>Eurytides</i> Hübner, [1821] (sensu lato); <i>Philotiella</i> Mattoni, [1978] of <i>Euphilotes</i> Mattoni, [1978]; <i>Neominois</i> Scudder, 1875 of <i>Oeneis</i> Hübner, [1819]; <i>Agraulis</i> Boisduval & Le Conte, [1835] of <i>Dione</i> Hübner, [1819]; <i>Copaeodes</i> Speyer, 1877 of <i>Oarisma</i> Scudder, 1872; and <i>Problema</i> Skinner & R. Williams, 1924 of <i>Atrytone</i> Scudder, 1872. <i>Phaeostrymon</i> Clench, 1961 and <i>Saliana</i> Evans, 1955 are junior subjective synonyms of <i>Satyrium</i> Scudder, 1876 and <i>Calpodes</i> Hübner, [1819], respectively. The entire subgenus <i>Erynnides</i> Burns, 1964 is transferred from <i>Erynnis</i> Schrank, 1801 to <i>Gesta</i> Evans, 1953. New genus-species combinations resulting from transfer of species between genera are: <i>Nastra perigenes</i> (Godman, 1900) (not <i>Vidius</i> Evans, 1955); <i>Troyus fantasos</i> (Cramer, 1780), <i>Troyus onaca</i> (Evans, 1955), <i>Troyus aurelius</i> (Plötz, 1882), <i>Troyus marcus</i> (Fabricius, 1787), <i>Troyus diversa</i> (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), and <i>Troyus drova</i> (Evans, 1955) (not <i>Vettius</i> Godman, 1901); <i>Oligoria percosius</i> (Godman, 1900), <i>Oligoria rindgei</i> (H. Freeman, 1969), <i>Oligoria lucifer</i> (Hübner, [1831]), and <i>Oligoria mustea</i> (H. Freeman, 1979) (not <i>Decinea</i> Evans, 1955). <i>Urbanus alva</i> Evans, 1952 is a valid species and not a synonym of <i>Urbanus belli</i> (Hayward, 1935), new status.</p>","PeriodicalId":75197,"journal":{"name":"The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570546/pdf/nihms-1724226.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39598561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1