Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01572-z
Jakob Mayr, Anna Kurnoth, Nora Koenemann, Timon Röttinger, Leonhard Lisitano, Edgar Mayr, Annabel Fenwick
Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic led to excess mortality, especially for vulnerable older patients with simultaneous comorbidities. Patients with proximal femoral fractures already have a high mortality risk of up to 30% during the first postoperative year. The purpose of this study was not only to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the mortality of patients tested positive but also of negatively tested patients with proximal femoral fractures.
Methods: A single center cohort study of 2186 patients (mean age 79.8 years) who were surgically treated for a proximal femoral fracture at a level I trauma center was retrospectively carried out. The mortality and complication rates before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2016-February 2020) and during the pandemic (March 2020-October 2021) were compared. A standardized treatment protocol was carried out during the total observational period. Orthogeriatric co-management was negatively impaired by the pandemic. Patient data, COVID-19 infections, surgical procedure, time from admission to surgery, postoperative complications and mortality were analyzed.
Results: The pandemic group included 596 patients with an average age of 79.7 years. During the pandemic 26 patients were tested positive for COVID-19 (18 women, 8 men, average age 81.4 years, minimum 63 years, maximum 99 years, SD 9 years). Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had more comorbidities than COVID-19 negative patients during the same period (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI 6.26 vs.5.25 points p < 0.037). The prepandemic control group consisted of 1590 patients with an average age of 79.9 years and a mean CCI of 5.86 points. Patients tested positive had a much longer hospitalization and a longer duration on the intensive care unit (p < 0.001) and a complication rate of 62.5%, especially due to the occurrence of pneumonia (p < 0.001). The mortality rate during the pandemic did not differ between patients tested positive or patients tested negative but was significantly higher for both groups in comparison to the period before the pandemic (pandemic 14% vs. 15.4%, before the pandemic 3.1%).
Conclusion: Patients suffering from COVID-19 infection and proximal femoral fractures have a high risk of complications and a high mortality. The total increase in mortality for all patients with critical injuries, such as hip fractures during the pandemic emphasizes the importance of early mobilization and orthogeriatric co-management, which was discontinued during the pandemic and the lockdown.
背景:全球COVID-19大流行导致死亡率过高,特别是对同时存在合并症的脆弱老年患者。股骨近端骨折患者在术后第一年的死亡率已经高达30%。本研究的目的不仅是研究COVID-19对阳性患者死亡率的影响,而且对阴性患者股骨近端骨折的死亡率也有影响。方法:对在某一级创伤中心行股骨近端骨折手术治疗的2186例患者(平均年龄79.8岁)进行回顾性单中心队列研究。比较2019冠状病毒病大流行前(2016年1月- 2020年2月)和大流行期间(2020年3月- 2021年10月)的死亡率和并发症发生率。在整个观察期内,采用标准化的治疗方案。正老年联合管理受到大流行的不利影响。分析患者资料、COVID-19感染情况、手术方式、入院至手术时间、术后并发症和死亡率。结果:大流行组596例,平均年龄79.7岁。在大流行期间,26例患者检测出COVID-19阳性(女性18例,男性8例,平均年龄81.4岁,最小63岁,最大99岁,SD 9岁)。同期新冠肺炎阳性患者合并症发生率高于阴性患者(Charlson共病指数,CCI 6.26 vs.5.25 p )结论:新冠肺炎感染合并股近端骨折患者并发症发生率高,死亡率高。大流行期间髋部骨折等所有严重受伤患者的死亡率总体上升,强调了早期动员和骨科联合管理的重要性,这种管理在大流行和封锁期间停止了。
{"title":"[Excess mortality of patients who negative for COVID-19 with proximal femoral fractures during the pandemic : What can we learn for future pandemics?]","authors":"Jakob Mayr, Anna Kurnoth, Nora Koenemann, Timon Röttinger, Leonhard Lisitano, Edgar Mayr, Annabel Fenwick","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01572-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01572-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global COVID-19 pandemic led to excess mortality, especially for vulnerable older patients with simultaneous comorbidities. Patients with proximal femoral fractures already have a high mortality risk of up to 30% during the first postoperative year. The purpose of this study was not only to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the mortality of patients tested positive but also of negatively tested patients with proximal femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center cohort study of 2186 patients (mean age 79.8 years) who were surgically treated for a proximal femoral fracture at a level I trauma center was retrospectively carried out. The mortality and complication rates before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2016-February 2020) and during the pandemic (March 2020-October 2021) were compared. A standardized treatment protocol was carried out during the total observational period. Orthogeriatric co-management was negatively impaired by the pandemic. Patient data, COVID-19 infections, surgical procedure, time from admission to surgery, postoperative complications and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pandemic group included 596 patients with an average age of 79.7 years. During the pandemic 26 patients were tested positive for COVID-19 (18 women, 8 men, average age 81.4 years, minimum 63 years, maximum 99 years, SD 9 years). Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had more comorbidities than COVID-19 negative patients during the same period (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI 6.26 vs.5.25 points p < 0.037). The prepandemic control group consisted of 1590 patients with an average age of 79.9 years and a mean CCI of 5.86 points. Patients tested positive had a much longer hospitalization and a longer duration on the intensive care unit (p < 0.001) and a complication rate of 62.5%, especially due to the occurrence of pneumonia (p < 0.001). The mortality rate during the pandemic did not differ between patients tested positive or patients tested negative but was significantly higher for both groups in comparison to the period before the pandemic (pandemic 14% vs. 15.4%, before the pandemic 3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients suffering from COVID-19 infection and proximal femoral fractures have a high risk of complications and a high mortality. The total increase in mortality for all patients with critical injuries, such as hip fractures during the pandemic emphasizes the importance of early mobilization and orthogeriatric co-management, which was discontinued during the pandemic and the lockdown.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"595-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144082363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-05-12DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01581-y
Jakob Cornelius, Johannes Knitza, Juliana Hack, Melina Pavlovic, Sebastian Kuhn
The integration of large language models (LLM) into the care of trauma surgery patients offers an exciting opportunity with immense potential to enhance the efficiency and quality of care. The LLM can serve as supportive tools for diagnosis, decision making and patient communication by efficiently providing medical knowledge and generating personalized treatment recommendations; however, there are also substantial challenges that must be addressed. The lack of transparency in the decision-making processes of LLM as well as currently unresolved legal and ethical issues, necessitate careful implementation and examination by medical professionals to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these technologies.
{"title":"[Potential applications of large language models in trauma surgery : Opportunities, risks and perspectives].","authors":"Jakob Cornelius, Johannes Knitza, Juliana Hack, Melina Pavlovic, Sebastian Kuhn","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01581-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01581-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of large language models (LLM) into the care of trauma surgery patients offers an exciting opportunity with immense potential to enhance the efficiency and quality of care. The LLM can serve as supportive tools for diagnosis, decision making and patient communication by efficiently providing medical knowledge and generating personalized treatment recommendations; however, there are also substantial challenges that must be addressed. The lack of transparency in the decision-making processes of LLM as well as currently unresolved legal and ethical issues, necessitate careful implementation and examination by medical professionals to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"587-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144058896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01596-5
Dominik M Haida, Oybek Khakimov, Stefan Huber-Wagner
Objectives of the surgery: The aim of this operation technique is to bridge the pathological fracture of a vertebral body by a dorsal spondylodesis, to stabilize the spine, reduce the pain and regain mobility.
Indications: Due to the vertebral body fracture (OF 2) of the third lumbar vertebral body (L3) and the associated pain and immobility and due to the modified score of the AO Spine-DGOU osteoporotic fracture (OF) classification system.
Contraindications: No specific contraindications.
Surgical technique: Technical set-up: Robotic Suite (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) with navigation unit "curve navigation system", robotic 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) "Loop-X", robotic arm "Cirq Arm System" and wall-mounted monitor "BUZZ". Operation steps are shown in the video (English): Planning of the screws based on preoperative CT imaging. Placement of the reference array. First imaging, image fusion and fusion control. Registration of instruments. Robotically assisted skin incision planning. Robotically assisted drilling. K-wire insertion. Second imaging and wire position check. Screw placement. Cement augmentation of the screws. Insertion of the connecting rods. Wound closure.
Follow-up: Full weight bearing, pain medication if required. Physiotherapeutic treatment to learn strengthening exercises and restoration of mobility. Medication with vitamin D3 and calcium. Metal removal is not intended.
Evidence: Operations on the lumbar spine are now routine clinical practice in orthopedics and trauma surgery. They can be performed without any problems and with very good accuracy in terms of precise screw placement.
手术目的:该手术技术的目的是通过背椎体融合术桥接病理性椎体骨折,以稳定脊柱,减轻疼痛并恢复活动能力。适应症:由于第三腰椎(L3)椎体骨折(OF 2)及其相关的疼痛和不活动,由于AO脊柱- dgou骨质疏松性骨折(OF)分类系统的改进评分。禁忌症:无特定禁忌症。手术技术:技术设置:机器人套件(Brainlab, Munich, Germany),带有导航单元“曲线导航系统”,机器人三维锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)“Loop-X”,机械臂“Cirq arm System”和壁挂式监视器“BUZZ”。操作步骤如视频(英文)所示:根据术前CT图像规划螺钉。引用数组的位置。首先是成像,图像融合和融合控制。文书注册。机器人辅助皮肤切口规划。机器人辅助钻井。钢丝插入。第二次成像和导线位置检查。螺杆位置。水泥加固螺钉。插入连杆。伤口关闭。随访:完全负重,必要时服用止痛药。理疗治疗学习加强锻炼和恢复活动能力。服用维生素D3和钙。不打算去除金属。证据:腰椎手术现在是骨科和创伤外科的常规临床实践。它们可以在没有任何问题的情况下进行,并且在精确的螺钉放置方面具有非常好的精度。
{"title":"[Robotically assisted and minimally invasive pedicle screw placement at the lumbar spine].","authors":"Dominik M Haida, Oybek Khakimov, Stefan Huber-Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01596-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01596-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives of the surgery: </strong>The aim of this operation technique is to bridge the pathological fracture of a vertebral body by a dorsal spondylodesis, to stabilize the spine, reduce the pain and regain mobility.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Due to the vertebral body fracture (OF 2) of the third lumbar vertebral body (L3) and the associated pain and immobility and due to the modified score of the AO Spine-DGOU osteoporotic fracture (OF) classification system.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>No specific contraindications.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Technical set-up: Robotic Suite (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) with navigation unit \"curve navigation system\", robotic 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) \"Loop-X\", robotic arm \"Cirq Arm System\" and wall-mounted monitor \"BUZZ\". Operation steps are shown in the video (English): Planning of the screws based on preoperative CT imaging. Placement of the reference array. First imaging, image fusion and fusion control. Registration of instruments. Robotically assisted skin incision planning. Robotically assisted drilling. K-wire insertion. Second imaging and wire position check. Screw placement. Cement augmentation of the screws. Insertion of the connecting rods. Wound closure.</p><p><strong>Follow-up: </strong>Full weight bearing, pain medication if required. Physiotherapeutic treatment to learn strengthening exercises and restoration of mobility. Medication with vitamin D3 and calcium. Metal removal is not intended.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Operations on the lumbar spine are now routine clinical practice in orthopedics and trauma surgery. They can be performed without any problems and with very good accuracy in terms of precise screw placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"637-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144499794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-06DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01568-9
Josef Stolberg-Stolberg, Charlotte Ramadan, Jeanette Köppe, Janette Iking, Karen Fischhuber, Markus Blätzinger, Michael J Raschke, J Christoph Katthagen
Background: Due to the demographic changes, including the need for more orthogeriatric co-management, addressing the healthcare of geriatric patients is an important issue.
Objective: The aim of this study was to create an overview of the fundamental characteristics of centers for geriatric trauma ATZ-DGU including the distribution of departments and cooperations as well as the level of trauma care. The distribution of sites across Germany was compared to hospital and population data.
Methods: Certified German ATZ-DGU were assigned to Trauma Center DGU® (TC) certification data (levels III-I) via institutional numbers. They were evaluated descriptively and correlations with several parameters at the federal states level were added.
Results: Due to cooperations 188 institutions formed 147 ATZ-DGU and 152 provided orthogeriatric co-management in domo. Of the facilities with trauma surgery departments 86% (n = 168) were certified as TCs (level II = 33% > III = 30% > I = 22%). The number of ATZ-DGU per German state was correlated with the number of hospitals (rs = 0.88), inhabitants (rs = 0.92) and cases in total (rs = 0.92, p < 0.001 each) but not with the proportion of people older than 65 years (p > 0.05). With only 14 facilities, the new federal states of Germany seemed to be disadvantaged and also showed great disparities compared to each other.
Conclusion: The levels of trauma care revealed a distribution referring to the different focus of the two certificates: treatment of the severely injured vs. geriatric co-treatment. On average, the population in the new German states was older, while there were less ATZ-DGU; however, there seemed to be a slight tendency towards improvement.
{"title":"[Centers for geriatric trauma DGU® : Distribution and development in Germany].","authors":"Josef Stolberg-Stolberg, Charlotte Ramadan, Jeanette Köppe, Janette Iking, Karen Fischhuber, Markus Blätzinger, Michael J Raschke, J Christoph Katthagen","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01568-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01568-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the demographic changes, including the need for more orthogeriatric co-management, addressing the healthcare of geriatric patients is an important issue.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to create an overview of the fundamental characteristics of centers for geriatric trauma ATZ-DGU including the distribution of departments and cooperations as well as the level of trauma care. The distribution of sites across Germany was compared to hospital and population data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Certified German ATZ-DGU were assigned to Trauma Center DGU<sup>®</sup> (TC) certification data (levels III-I) via institutional numbers. They were evaluated descriptively and correlations with several parameters at the federal states level were added.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Due to cooperations 188 institutions formed 147 ATZ-DGU and 152 provided orthogeriatric co-management in domo. Of the facilities with trauma surgery departments 86% (n = 168) were certified as TCs (level II = 33% > III = 30% > I = 22%). The number of ATZ-DGU per German state was correlated with the number of hospitals (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.88), inhabitants (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.92) and cases in total (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.92, p < 0.001 each) but not with the proportion of people older than 65 years (p > 0.05). With only 14 facilities, the new federal states of Germany seemed to be disadvantaged and also showed great disparities compared to each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The levels of trauma care revealed a distribution referring to the different focus of the two certificates: treatment of the severely injured vs. geriatric co-treatment. On average, the population in the new German states was older, while there were less ATZ-DGU; however, there seemed to be a slight tendency towards improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"525-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144058892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-24DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01574-x
Karl J Sander, Julia Sußiek, Mats Jonas Wiethölter, Michael J Raschke, J Christoph Katthagen
Due to demographic changes, proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are becoming increasingly more frequent in routine clinical practice. At the same time, surgical treatment is more frequently indicated and more demanding due to increasingly more complex fracture morphology and declining bone quality. Osteosynthesis using locking plate fixation remains the mainstay of surgical treatment alongside reverse fracture arthroplasty. The treatment concept is individually dependent on the characteristics of the fracture morphology, the patient-specific risk profile and the expertise of the surgeon. In younger patients fracture fixation is preferable, when feasible. In recent years, combinations of different surgical techniques have been increasingly used to achieve humeral head preservation and sufficient stability. The risk of complications, such as secondary dislocation and screw cut-out has significantly decreased in recent years due to improved evaluation of the indications and surgical techniques. As one of these combined procedures, double plate fixation offers promising options for complex fractures due to an additional plate applied ventrally. This technique is increasingly becoming established in routine clinical practice. Cement augmentation of screws and different bone grafts are additional options to supplement locking plate osteosynthesis so that a good reconstruction result can also be achieved in osteoporotic bone.
{"title":"[Osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures : Plating, double plating and more].","authors":"Karl J Sander, Julia Sußiek, Mats Jonas Wiethölter, Michael J Raschke, J Christoph Katthagen","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01574-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01574-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to demographic changes, proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are becoming increasingly more frequent in routine clinical practice. At the same time, surgical treatment is more frequently indicated and more demanding due to increasingly more complex fracture morphology and declining bone quality. Osteosynthesis using locking plate fixation remains the mainstay of surgical treatment alongside reverse fracture arthroplasty. The treatment concept is individually dependent on the characteristics of the fracture morphology, the patient-specific risk profile and the expertise of the surgeon. In younger patients fracture fixation is preferable, when feasible. In recent years, combinations of different surgical techniques have been increasingly used to achieve humeral head preservation and sufficient stability. The risk of complications, such as secondary dislocation and screw cut-out has significantly decreased in recent years due to improved evaluation of the indications and surgical techniques. As one of these combined procedures, double plate fixation offers promising options for complex fractures due to an additional plate applied ventrally. This technique is increasingly becoming established in routine clinical practice. Cement augmentation of screws and different bone grafts are additional options to supplement locking plate osteosynthesis so that a good reconstruction result can also be achieved in osteoporotic bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"501-507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213982/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144045548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-26DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01586-7
Christian Karl Spies
{"title":"[Wrist arthroscopy remains the reference standard for the diagnostics of lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex].","authors":"Christian Karl Spies","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01586-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01586-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"565-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144144902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Subtalar dislocations (simultaneous dislocations of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints) without concomitant fracture are rare and account for 1-2% of all dislocations. The treatment has been described in several case reports and consists primarily of closed reduction with the patient under anesthesia followed by immobilization.
Case: A 30-year-old male patient sustained a multidimensional nonfractured dislocation of the ankle joint with a predominantly subtalar component (luxatio subtalolateralis) while climbing. As it turned out later, a closed reduction was not possible due to interposition of the tendons of the posterior tibialis muscle and the flexor digitorum pedis longus muscle, so that an open reduction had to be performed. The full extent of the injury could only be assessed during the surgical exploration. The patient was treated in an external fixator for 12 weeks. Subsequently, physiotherapy was initiated. After only 6 months postoperatively the patient showed good mobility, functionality and resilience in the affected ankle joint. After 30 months the patient was free of symptoms. The prolonged immobilization after subtalar dislocation using an external fixator over a total period of 12 weeks, as performed in this case report, demonstrated good long-term functional outcomes.
{"title":"[Prolonged immobilization with an external fixator for subtalar dislocation without fracture : A case report].","authors":"Yasmin Youssef, Volker Schöffl, Gordian Weber, Steffen Röttel, Christian Willy, Falko Patzsch","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01583-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01583-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtalar dislocations (simultaneous dislocations of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints) without concomitant fracture are rare and account for 1-2% of all dislocations. The treatment has been described in several case reports and consists primarily of closed reduction with the patient under anesthesia followed by immobilization.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>A 30-year-old male patient sustained a multidimensional nonfractured dislocation of the ankle joint with a predominantly subtalar component (luxatio subtalolateralis) while climbing. As it turned out later, a closed reduction was not possible due to interposition of the tendons of the posterior tibialis muscle and the flexor digitorum pedis longus muscle, so that an open reduction had to be performed. The full extent of the injury could only be assessed during the surgical exploration. The patient was treated in an external fixator for 12 weeks. Subsequently, physiotherapy was initiated. After only 6 months postoperatively the patient showed good mobility, functionality and resilience in the affected ankle joint. After 30 months the patient was free of symptoms. The prolonged immobilization after subtalar dislocation using an external fixator over a total period of 12 weeks, as performed in this case report, demonstrated good long-term functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"545-551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144201036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-06DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01580-z
Dominik M Haida, Iris Wagenblast, Stefan Huber-Wagner
Objective of surgery: The aim of this operation is to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring fractures on both sides and the sacral fracture on the right using robotically assisted screw osteosynthesis and to restore the mobility of the patient.
Indications: The indications arise from the patient's very severe pain, resulting immobility under conservative treatment measures and a fragility fracture of the pelvis grade II (FFP II).
Contraindications: Typical contraindications for this type of operation are the same as for conventional techniques (mainly infection and swelling).
Surgical technique: Performed in the 3D navigation hybrid operating theatre Robotic Suite with the following components: navigation unit "Curve Navigation System", movable robotic 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) "Loop‑X", robotic arm "Cirq Arm System" and wall monitor "BUZZ" (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). The individual surgical steps are explained in the video online (English).
Follow-up treatment: Full weight bearing, pain medication according to the World Health Organization (WHO) stage scheme, physiotherapy after the first postoperative day.
Evidence: Navigated and robotically assisted techniques are mainly used on the spine. These techniques are also increasingly being used on the pelvis, whereby very high levels of accuracy can also be achieved.
手术目的:本手术的目的是利用机器人辅助螺钉固定两侧骨盆前环骨折和右侧骶骨骨折,并恢复患者的活动能力。适应症:该适应症源于患者非常剧烈的疼痛,在保守治疗措施下导致行动不便,骨盆脆性骨折II级(FFP II)。禁忌症:这类手术的典型禁忌症与传统技术相同(主要是感染和肿胀)。手术技术:在三维导航混合手术室进行机器人套件包含以下组件:导航单元“曲线导航系统”,可移动机器人三维锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)“Loop - X”,机械臂“Cirq arm System”和墙壁监视器“BUZZ”(Brainlab,慕尼黑,德国)。在线视频(英语)中解释了每个手术步骤。随访治疗:全负重,按照世界卫生组织(WHO)分期方案进行止痛药治疗,术后第一天进行物理治疗。证据:导航和机器人辅助技术主要用于脊柱。这些技术也越来越多地用于骨盆,因此也可以达到非常高的准确性。
{"title":"[Robotically assisted placement of a pubic ramus screw and an SI-S1 screw].","authors":"Dominik M Haida, Iris Wagenblast, Stefan Huber-Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01580-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01580-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective of surgery: </strong>The aim of this operation is to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring fractures on both sides and the sacral fracture on the right using robotically assisted screw osteosynthesis and to restore the mobility of the patient.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>The indications arise from the patient's very severe pain, resulting immobility under conservative treatment measures and a fragility fracture of the pelvis grade II (FFP II).</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Typical contraindications for this type of operation are the same as for conventional techniques (mainly infection and swelling).</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Performed in the 3D navigation hybrid operating theatre Robotic Suite with the following components: navigation unit \"Curve Navigation System\", movable robotic 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) \"Loop‑X\", robotic arm \"Cirq Arm System\" and wall monitor \"BUZZ\" (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). The individual surgical steps are explained in the video online (English).</p><p><strong>Follow-up treatment: </strong>Full weight bearing, pain medication according to the World Health Organization (WHO) stage scheme, physiotherapy after the first postoperative day.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Navigated and robotically assisted techniques are mainly used on the spine. These techniques are also increasingly being used on the pelvis, whereby very high levels of accuracy can also be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"560-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144060711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-20DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01587-6
Jan N Riesselmann, Freya M Reeh, Helmut Lill, Alexander Ellwein
The rising incidence of proximal humeral fractures has made this an important topic in the treatment reality of trauma surgery. Given the variety of treatment options available, the question arises as to what extent patient age influences the choice of treatment and, consequently, the functional outcome. In our approach the morphological features of the fracture and individual patient characteristics form the foundation for determining whether surgical or conservative treatment should be pursued. Whenever possible, joint-preserving reconstruction should be the goal in younger patients. In older patients, the implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the treatment of choice. Joint replacement enables early mobilization of older patients, facilitating a swift return to daily life. Looking ahead, a further increase in the fracture incidence and a corresponding rise in the rate of necessary surgical interventions are anticipated.
{"title":"[Old and young-Differences in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures?]","authors":"Jan N Riesselmann, Freya M Reeh, Helmut Lill, Alexander Ellwein","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01587-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01587-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising incidence of proximal humeral fractures has made this an important topic in the treatment reality of trauma surgery. Given the variety of treatment options available, the question arises as to what extent patient age influences the choice of treatment and, consequently, the functional outcome. In our approach the morphological features of the fracture and individual patient characteristics form the foundation for determining whether surgical or conservative treatment should be pursued. Whenever possible, joint-preserving reconstruction should be the goal in younger patients. In older patients, the implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the treatment of choice. Joint replacement enables early mobilization of older patients, facilitating a swift return to daily life. Looking ahead, a further increase in the fracture incidence and a corresponding rise in the rate of necessary surgical interventions are anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"492-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144113036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-26DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01585-8
S Albers, M Zyskowski, P Zehnder, C Kirchhoff, P Biberthaler, Markus Schwarz
The shoulder joint combines three main joints and two auxiliary joints, which enable a unique freedom of movement. Stability is primarily ensured by muscles and ligaments, making injuries, overuse or degenerative processes common causes of complaints. A systematic examination includes the anamnesis, inspection, palpation, range of motion assessment and functional tests. During the inspection the pattern of movement, muscle atrophy and malalignments are assessed. Bone and soft tissue structures are tested by palpation. Functional tests help to differentiate pathological alterations. A structured examination enables an accurate diagnosis with the option of supplementary imaging examinations.
{"title":"[Focus on the shoulder : Precise diagnostics for complex pathological alterations].","authors":"S Albers, M Zyskowski, P Zehnder, C Kirchhoff, P Biberthaler, Markus Schwarz","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01585-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00113-025-01585-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shoulder joint combines three main joints and two auxiliary joints, which enable a unique freedom of movement. Stability is primarily ensured by muscles and ligaments, making injuries, overuse or degenerative processes common causes of complaints. A systematic examination includes the anamnesis, inspection, palpation, range of motion assessment and functional tests. During the inspection the pattern of movement, muscle atrophy and malalignments are assessed. Bone and soft tissue structures are tested by palpation. Functional tests help to differentiate pathological alterations. A structured examination enables an accurate diagnosis with the option of supplementary imaging examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"533-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144144901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}