In adult soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall, improved prognostic factors are needed to identify patients at high-risk for metastasis. Various factors are included in the many prognostic systems currently in use and the prognostic value of immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of biological markers is unclear. The tissue-preserving, high throughput tissue microarray (TMA) technique for analysis of immunohistochemical expression of biological markers was validated for Ki-67, and was found to yield results comparable to conventional staining methods. TMA was used to study the IHC expression of multiple markers (Ki-67, p53, cyclin A, bcl-2, beta-catenin, CD44, and Pgp) in 218 malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFH) and in 140 mixed STS. In the MFH series, tumor size and Ki-67, as the only IHC marker, provided independent prognostic information. In the mixed STS series whole-tumor sections were used and TMA was performed in the peripheral tumor growth zone. Whole-tumor sections facilitated assessment of the strong independent prognostic factors for metastasis vascular invasion, hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, tumor necrosis (HR 2.8), and tumor growth pattern (HR 3.2), and the latter also correlated with local recurrence (LR). In comparison, histological malignancy grade, tumor size, and depth were not of independent prognostic value. When TMA was performed from the peripheral tumor growth zone, the IHC expression of Ki-67 (HR 1.9), beta-catenin (HR 2.7), CD44 (HR 2.1) and Pgp (HR 2.4) were independent prognostic factors. Finally, prognostic factors were found to be time-dependent, and most had lost their prognostic value after 2 years, whereas LR was a strong prognostic factor for metastasis whenever it occurred.
{"title":"Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma. Tissue microarray for immunostaining, the importance of whole-tumor sections and time-dependence.","authors":"Jacob Engellau","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In adult soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall, improved prognostic factors are needed to identify patients at high-risk for metastasis. Various factors are included in the many prognostic systems currently in use and the prognostic value of immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of biological markers is unclear. The tissue-preserving, high throughput tissue microarray (TMA) technique for analysis of immunohistochemical expression of biological markers was validated for Ki-67, and was found to yield results comparable to conventional staining methods. TMA was used to study the IHC expression of multiple markers (Ki-67, p53, cyclin A, bcl-2, beta-catenin, CD44, and Pgp) in 218 malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFH) and in 140 mixed STS. In the MFH series, tumor size and Ki-67, as the only IHC marker, provided independent prognostic information. In the mixed STS series whole-tumor sections were used and TMA was performed in the peripheral tumor growth zone. Whole-tumor sections facilitated assessment of the strong independent prognostic factors for metastasis vascular invasion, hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, tumor necrosis (HR 2.8), and tumor growth pattern (HR 3.2), and the latter also correlated with local recurrence (LR). In comparison, histological malignancy grade, tumor size, and depth were not of independent prognostic value. When TMA was performed from the peripheral tumor growth zone, the IHC expression of Ki-67 (HR 1.9), beta-catenin (HR 2.7), CD44 (HR 2.1) and Pgp (HR 2.4) were independent prognostic factors. Finally, prognostic factors were found to be time-dependent, and most had lost their prognostic value after 2 years, whereas LR was a strong prognostic factor for metastasis whenever it occurred.</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 314","pages":"2 p preceding table of contents-52, backcover"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24929573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has become one of the most common causes of disability in adults under 45 years of age and is consequently one of the most common reasons for early retirement in industrialised societies. Accordingly, CLBP represents an expensive drain on society's resources and is a very challenging area for which a consensus for rational therapy is yet to be established. The spinal fusion procedure was introduced as a treatment option for CLBP more than 70 years ago. However, few areas of spinal surgery have caused so much controversy as spinal fusion. The literature reveals divergent opinions about when fusion is indicated and how it should be performed. Furthermore, the significance of the role of postoperative rehabilitation following spinal fusion may be underestimated. There exists no consensus on the design of a program specific for rehabilitation. Ideally, for any given surgical procedure, it should be possible to identify not only possible complications relative to a surgical procedure, but also what symptoms may be expected, and what pain behaviour may be expected of a particular patient. The overall aims of the current studies were: 1) to introduce patient-based functional outcome evaluation into spinal fusion treatment; 2) to evaluate radiological assessment of different spinal fusion procedures; 3) to investigate the effect of titanium versus stainless steel pedicle screws on mechanical fixation and bone ingrowth in lumbar spinal fusion; 4) to analyse the clinical and radiological outcome of different lumbar spinal fusion techniques; 5) to evaluate complications and re-operation rates following different surgical procedures; and 6) to analyse the effect of different rehabilitation strategies for lumbar spinal fusion patients. The present thesis comprises 9 studies: 2 clinical retrospective studies, 1 clinical prospective case/reference study, 5 clinical randomised prospective studies and 1 animal study (Mini-pigs). In total, 594 patients were included in the investigation from 1979 to 1999. Each had prior to inclusion at least 2 years of CLBP and had therefore been subjected to most of the conservative treatment leg pain, due to localized isthmic spondylolisthesis grades I-II or primary or secondary degeneration. PATIENT-BASED FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME: Patients' self-reported parameters should include the impact of CLBP on daily activity, work and leisure time activities, anxiety/depression, social interests and intensity of back and leg pain. Between 1993 and 2003 approximately 1400 lumbar spinal fusion patients completed the Dallas Pain Questionnaire under prospective design studies. In 1996, the Low Back Pain Rating scale was added to the standard questionnaire packet distributed among spinal fusion patients. In our experience, these tools are valid instruments for clinical assessment of candidates for spinal fusion procedures.
Radiological assessment: It is extremely difficult to interpret radi
{"title":"Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation.","authors":"Finn Bjarke Christensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has become one of the most common causes of disability in adults under 45 years of age and is consequently one of the most common reasons for early retirement in industrialised societies. Accordingly, CLBP represents an expensive drain on society's resources and is a very challenging area for which a consensus for rational therapy is yet to be established. The spinal fusion procedure was introduced as a treatment option for CLBP more than 70 years ago. However, few areas of spinal surgery have caused so much controversy as spinal fusion. The literature reveals divergent opinions about when fusion is indicated and how it should be performed. Furthermore, the significance of the role of postoperative rehabilitation following spinal fusion may be underestimated. There exists no consensus on the design of a program specific for rehabilitation. Ideally, for any given surgical procedure, it should be possible to identify not only possible complications relative to a surgical procedure, but also what symptoms may be expected, and what pain behaviour may be expected of a particular patient. The overall aims of the current studies were: 1) to introduce patient-based functional outcome evaluation into spinal fusion treatment; 2) to evaluate radiological assessment of different spinal fusion procedures; 3) to investigate the effect of titanium versus stainless steel pedicle screws on mechanical fixation and bone ingrowth in lumbar spinal fusion; 4) to analyse the clinical and radiological outcome of different lumbar spinal fusion techniques; 5) to evaluate complications and re-operation rates following different surgical procedures; and 6) to analyse the effect of different rehabilitation strategies for lumbar spinal fusion patients. The present thesis comprises 9 studies: 2 clinical retrospective studies, 1 clinical prospective case/reference study, 5 clinical randomised prospective studies and 1 animal study (Mini-pigs). In total, 594 patients were included in the investigation from 1979 to 1999. Each had prior to inclusion at least 2 years of CLBP and had therefore been subjected to most of the conservative treatment leg pain, due to localized isthmic spondylolisthesis grades I-II or primary or secondary degeneration. PATIENT-BASED FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME: Patients' self-reported parameters should include the impact of CLBP on daily activity, work and leisure time activities, anxiety/depression, social interests and intensity of back and leg pain. Between 1993 and 2003 approximately 1400 lumbar spinal fusion patients completed the Dallas Pain Questionnaire under prospective design studies. In 1996, the Low Back Pain Rating scale was added to the standard questionnaire packet distributed among spinal fusion patients. In our experience, these tools are valid instruments for clinical assessment of candidates for spinal fusion procedures.</p><p><strong>Radiological assessment: </strong>It is extremely difficult to interpret radi","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 313","pages":"2-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24826126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708270
B H Hansen, J Keller, M Laitinen, P Berg, S Skjeldal, C Trovik, J Nilsson, A Walloe, A Kalén, R Wedin
Introduction: The assessment of the prognosis for the individual patient is important for the choice of surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. In 1999 the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) initiated the Skeletal Metastasis Register as a multicentric, prospective study to provide a scientific basis for treatment recommendations. To improve prognostication we analyzed the survival of patients with skeletal metastases surgically treated at 9 SSG centres.
Patients and methods: 460 patients with an average age of 64 years underwent 501 operations for non-spinal skeletal metastases. 7% were operated for more than one metastasis. Carcinoma of the breast, prostate, kidney and lung were the dominating primary tumors.
Results: The survival rate was 0.4 at 1 year, 0.3 at 2 years and 0.2 at 3 years. Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to bone localization, skeletal metastatic load, presence of visceral metastases, Karnofsky performance score, primary tumor type, presence of a complete pathological fracture and preoperative hemoglobin content. Multivariate regression analysis showed that pathological fracture, visceral metastases, haemoglobin content < 7 mmol/L and lung cancer were negative prognostic factors for survival. Myeloma was the sole positive prognostic factor for survival.
{"title":"The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Register. Survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities.","authors":"B H Hansen, J Keller, M Laitinen, P Berg, S Skjeldal, C Trovik, J Nilsson, A Walloe, A Kalén, R Wedin","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of the prognosis for the individual patient is important for the choice of surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. In 1999 the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) initiated the Skeletal Metastasis Register as a multicentric, prospective study to provide a scientific basis for treatment recommendations. To improve prognostication we analyzed the survival of patients with skeletal metastases surgically treated at 9 SSG centres.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>460 patients with an average age of 64 years underwent 501 operations for non-spinal skeletal metastases. 7% were operated for more than one metastasis. Carcinoma of the breast, prostate, kidney and lung were the dominating primary tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survival rate was 0.4 at 1 year, 0.3 at 2 years and 0.2 at 3 years. Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to bone localization, skeletal metastatic load, presence of visceral metastases, Karnofsky performance score, primary tumor type, presence of a complete pathological fracture and preoperative hemoglobin content. Multivariate regression analysis showed that pathological fracture, visceral metastases, haemoglobin content < 7 mmol/L and lung cancer were negative prognostic factors for survival. Myeloma was the sole positive prognostic factor for survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"11-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708270","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24558141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meniscectomy is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA), a disease that traditionally has been considered as a simple "wear and tear" phenomenon. However, despite numerous reports, little evidence has been presented that a limited meniscal resection, compared with a more extensive resection, reduces the risk of OA by preserving meniscal function. Why? This thesis provides one possible answer to that question. Patients, who had undergone isolated meniscal resection in 1973, 1978, or between 1983 and 1985 at Lund University Hospital, Sweden, were reviewed clinically and radiographically 15-22 years after the surgical procedure. Of the subjects (n = 317) almost 50% had developed radiographic OA in their operated knee, but just over half of these patients were symptomatic. An additional 20% of the patients had knee symptoms, but did not have radiographic knee OA. These results confirm a limited correlation between radiographic features of the disorder and symptoms. A degenerative type of meniscal tear and obesity were the factors most strongly associated with both radiographic knee OA and symptomatic radiographic knee OA. Partial meniscal resection induced less radiographic changes related to knee OA compared with total meniscectomy, but the patient-relevant outcomes remained essentially the same. If radiographic hand OA was present there was an increased likelihood of the patient also having knee OA following meniscectomy. This finding was independent of age, and therefore an inherited susceptibility to the disease contributes to the risk of knee OA after meniscal tear. Genetic and environmental risk factors interact in OA development. A degenerative meniscal lesion is often associated with early-stage knee OA, a disorder also involving the meniscal tissue. The tear may thus represent the first "signal" feature of OA. The challenge for the health professional is to discriminate between symptoms caused by a meniscal tear and those caused by OA. Meniscal resection may not benefit the patient with early-stage knee OA. The intervention merely removes evidence of the disorder, while the OA joint degradation proceeds.
{"title":"Meniscal tear--a feature of osteoarthritis.","authors":"Martin Englund","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meniscectomy is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA), a disease that traditionally has been considered as a simple \"wear and tear\" phenomenon. However, despite numerous reports, little evidence has been presented that a limited meniscal resection, compared with a more extensive resection, reduces the risk of OA by preserving meniscal function. Why? This thesis provides one possible answer to that question. Patients, who had undergone isolated meniscal resection in 1973, 1978, or between 1983 and 1985 at Lund University Hospital, Sweden, were reviewed clinically and radiographically 15-22 years after the surgical procedure. Of the subjects (n = 317) almost 50% had developed radiographic OA in their operated knee, but just over half of these patients were symptomatic. An additional 20% of the patients had knee symptoms, but did not have radiographic knee OA. These results confirm a limited correlation between radiographic features of the disorder and symptoms. A degenerative type of meniscal tear and obesity were the factors most strongly associated with both radiographic knee OA and symptomatic radiographic knee OA. Partial meniscal resection induced less radiographic changes related to knee OA compared with total meniscectomy, but the patient-relevant outcomes remained essentially the same. If radiographic hand OA was present there was an increased likelihood of the patient also having knee OA following meniscectomy. This finding was independent of age, and therefore an inherited susceptibility to the disease contributes to the risk of knee OA after meniscal tear. Genetic and environmental risk factors interact in OA development. A degenerative meniscal lesion is often associated with early-stage knee OA, a disorder also involving the meniscal tissue. The tear may thus represent the first \"signal\" feature of OA. The challenge for the health professional is to discriminate between symptoms caused by a meniscal tear and those caused by OA. Meniscal resection may not benefit the patient with early-stage knee OA. The intervention merely removes evidence of the disorder, while the OA joint degradation proceeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 312","pages":"1-45, backcover"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24558572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708310
M Nilbert, L A Meza-Zepeda, P Francis, J M Berner, H M Namløs, J Fernebro, O Myklebost
Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors and include over 50 histotypes. Some of these tumor types are characterized by specific chromosomal translocations, whereas other types show complex genetic aberrations. The recent developments within gene expression technologies have now been applied to studies of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and the first results indicate that genetic signatures are useful for classification and diagnosis. Distinctive expression profiles have been found in e.g. gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), synovial sarcomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), and in subsets of liposarcomas. The more pleomorphic tumor types, such as high-grade variants of leiomyosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFHs), fibrosarcomas, and subtypes of liposarcomas, show a greater variability among the expression profiles, but interestingly subsets with distinctive expression profiles can be identified also among these tumors. The data available place many of the genes hypothesized to be involved in the development of a certain type of STS, such as the KIT gene in GIST development, among the top discriminating genes. Thereby expression profiling provides novel insights into the pathogenesis of STS. Although much work remains to be done to validate the data and to define optimal discriminating gene lists, the current lessons from gene expression studies in STS are encouraging and imply that genetic signatures may serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers and may help identify novel therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"Lessons from genetic profiling in soft tissue sarcomas.","authors":"M Nilbert, L A Meza-Zepeda, P Francis, J M Berner, H M Namløs, J Fernebro, O Myklebost","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors and include over 50 histotypes. Some of these tumor types are characterized by specific chromosomal translocations, whereas other types show complex genetic aberrations. The recent developments within gene expression technologies have now been applied to studies of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and the first results indicate that genetic signatures are useful for classification and diagnosis. Distinctive expression profiles have been found in e.g. gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), synovial sarcomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), and in subsets of liposarcomas. The more pleomorphic tumor types, such as high-grade variants of leiomyosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFHs), fibrosarcomas, and subtypes of liposarcomas, show a greater variability among the expression profiles, but interestingly subsets with distinctive expression profiles can be identified also among these tumors. The data available place many of the genes hypothesized to be involved in the development of a certain type of STS, such as the KIT gene in GIST development, among the top discriminating genes. Thereby expression profiling provides novel insights into the pathogenesis of STS. Although much work remains to be done to validate the data and to define optimal discriminating gene lists, the current lessons from gene expression studies in STS are encouraging and imply that genetic signatures may serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers and may help identify novel therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"35-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24559779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708260
H C Bauer, T A Alvegård, O Berlin, M Erlanson, A Kalén, P Lindholm, P Gustafson, S Smeland, C S Trovik
In 1986, the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group initiated a Register of sarcoma patients who had been referred to tumor centers in Finland, Norway and Sweden. The Southern Sweden Sarcoma Register served as a model for the SSG Register (Rydholm 1983). All sarcoma centers in Norway (Bergen, Oslo, and Trondheim) and Sweden (Gothenburg, Linkoping, Lund, Stockholm, Umea) have continuously reported patients to the SSG Register. In these countries patients with sarcoma of the trunk wall and extremities are not treated outside of these referral centers except by mistake. Comparisons with the respective National Cancer Reg
{"title":"The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register 1986-2001.","authors":"H C Bauer, T A Alvegård, O Berlin, M Erlanson, A Kalén, P Lindholm, P Gustafson, S Smeland, C S Trovik","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708260","url":null,"abstract":"In 1986, the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group initiated a Register of sarcoma patients who had been referred to tumor centers in Finland, Norway and Sweden. The Southern Sweden Sarcoma Register served as a model for the SSG Register (Rydholm 1983). All sarcoma centers in Norway (Bergen, Oslo, and Trondheim) and Sweden (Gothenburg, Linkoping, Lund, Stockholm, Umea) have continuously reported patients to the SSG Register. In these countries patients with sarcoma of the trunk wall and extremities are not treated outside of these referral centers except by mistake. Comparisons with the respective National Cancer Reg","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"8-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708260","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24557090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708300
M Nilbert, J Engellau
The tissue microarray (TMA) technology was introduced in 1998 as a tissue preserving, high-throughput technique that allows studies of multiple markers in large sample sets. TMA slides can be analyzed using techniques such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization and represents a powerful tool for the investigation of potential diagnostic and prognostic markers identified in DNA microarray studies. We review the TMA method, its reproducibility, advantages, limitations and future perspectives with specific focus on soft tissue sarcomas.
{"title":"Experiences from tissue microarray in soft tissue sarcomas.","authors":"M Nilbert, J Engellau","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The tissue microarray (TMA) technology was introduced in 1998 as a tissue preserving, high-throughput technique that allows studies of multiple markers in large sample sets. TMA slides can be analyzed using techniques such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization and represents a powerful tool for the investigation of potential diagnostic and prognostic markers identified in DNA microarray studies. We review the TMA method, its reproducibility, advantages, limitations and future perspectives with specific focus on soft tissue sarcomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708300","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24558150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708330
O Brosjö, H C Bauer
In 1979, the year when Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) was created, treatment of patients with osteosarcoma and Ewingʼs sarcoma was most often amputation. The diagnostic and preoperative tools were plain radiographs and sometimes CT and/or angiography. Histopathologic diagnosis was achieved by open biopsy. In the few cases treated by a local excision, reconstruction was performed with allografts or joint prostheses. The local recurrence rate after local excision of osteosarcoma was sometimes as high as 30% (Bauer et al. 1989). Despite these surgical efforts, most patients died in metastatic disease. At this time, Dr. Gerald Rosen had started adjuvant multidrug chemotherapy of patients with osteosarcoma or Ewingʼs sarcoma (Rosen at al. 1975, Rosen et al. 1981). At the Karolinska Hospital, Dr. Hans Strander used human leucocyte interferon, instead of chemotherapy, as an adjuvant treatment after surgery in patients with osteosarcoma (Strander 1977). In this presentation, we will focus on the progress, over the last 25 years, in the diagnostic procedures and surgical treatment of patients with osteosarcoma and Ewingʼs sarcoma in Scandinavia and our policy at the Karolinska Hospital.
{"title":"Diagnostic procedures and surgical treatment of bone sarcomas. Experience from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group and Karolinska Hospital.","authors":"O Brosjö, H C Bauer","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708330","url":null,"abstract":"In 1979, the year when Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) was created, treatment of patients with osteosarcoma and Ewingʼs sarcoma was most often amputation. The diagnostic and preoperative tools were plain radiographs and sometimes CT and/or angiography. Histopathologic diagnosis was achieved by open biopsy. In the few cases treated by a local excision, reconstruction was performed with allografts or joint prostheses. The local recurrence rate after local excision of osteosarcoma was sometimes as high as 30% (Bauer et al. 1989). Despite these surgical efforts, most patients died in metastatic disease. At this time, Dr. Gerald Rosen had started adjuvant multidrug chemotherapy of patients with osteosarcoma or Ewingʼs sarcoma (Rosen at al. 1975, Rosen et al. 1981). At the Karolinska Hospital, Dr. Hans Strander used human leucocyte interferon, instead of chemotherapy, as an adjuvant treatment after surgery in patients with osteosarcoma (Strander 1977). In this presentation, we will focus on the progress, over the last 25 years, in the diagnostic procedures and surgical treatment of patients with osteosarcoma and Ewingʼs sarcoma in Scandinavia and our policy at the Karolinska Hospital.","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708330","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24559783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2004-04-01DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708360
J O Fernberg, K Sundby Hall
The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) started its first chemotherapy study in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in 1981 (SSG I). This study evaluated single agent doxorubicin given adjuvant in a prospective randomized trial in patients with high-grade STS. Neither overall survival nor disease-free survival was improved. Combination chemotherapy was hereafter studied in a phase II study (1991-1994) combining ifosfamide and continuous infusion etoposide with growth factor support (SSG X). The response rate in previously untreated patients was high (42%), but complete remissions were few. Analysis made on patients operated after chemotherapy indicated improved survival in this subgroup. Meta-analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable STS in adults, including the SSG I trial, has indicated improved disease-free survival and a trend towards improved overall survival. Presently, SSG is testing whether such a benefit can be found for adjuvant ifosfamide and doxorubicin treatment given after primary surgery in selected patients with high-grade STS and other well defined unfavourable prognostic factors (SSG XIII).
{"title":"Chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience.","authors":"J O Fernberg, K Sundby Hall","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001708360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001708360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) started its first chemotherapy study in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in 1981 (SSG I). This study evaluated single agent doxorubicin given adjuvant in a prospective randomized trial in patients with high-grade STS. Neither overall survival nor disease-free survival was improved. Combination chemotherapy was hereafter studied in a phase II study (1991-1994) combining ifosfamide and continuous infusion etoposide with growth factor support (SSG X). The response rate in previously untreated patients was high (42%), but complete remissions were few. Analysis made on patients operated after chemotherapy indicated improved survival in this subgroup. Meta-analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable STS in adults, including the SSG I trial, has indicated improved disease-free survival and a trend towards improved overall survival. Presently, SSG is testing whether such a benefit can be found for adjuvant ifosfamide and doxorubicin treatment given after primary surgery in selected patients with high-grade STS and other well defined unfavourable prognostic factors (SSG XIII).</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"75 311","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001708360","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24559787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}