American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy最新文献

Purpose: The goals of this paper are to (1) provide evidence and expert consensus to support a unified approach to estimating kidney filtration in adults with stable kidney function using race-free estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in place of Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance (C-G eCrCL) for medical and medication-related decisions, and (2) demonstrate how adjusting eGFR results for an individual's body surface area (BSA) when it is higher or lower than 1.73 m2 will improve results for medication-related decisions.

Summary: C-G eCrCL is predominantly used by US pharmacists to determine eGFR for the purposes of medication-related decisions, even though more accurate eGFR equations exist. Several driving factors make it the ideal time to shift clinical practice from using C-G eCrCL to eGFR. These factors include the following: (1) 2024 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry recommends eGFR over C-G eCrCL to evaluate the impact on pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired kidney function; (2) a joint National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and American Society of Nephrology task force recommends 3 race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR equations for medical and medication-related decision-making; (3) the almost ubiquitous use of standardized serum creatinine assay methods in US clinical laboratories; and (4) increasing availability and use of serum cystatin C for eGFR assessment. This publication guides practitioners through the rationale for using race-free eGFR equations for medication-related decisions and how to implement this practice change.

Conclusion: The NKF Workgroup for Implementation of Race-Free eGFR-Based Medication-Related Decisions suggests that health systems, health settings, clinical laboratories, electronic health record systems, compendia and data vendors, and healthcare practitioners involved with medication-related decision-making transition away from C-G eCrCL and towards the race-free eGFR equations for more accurate assessment of kidney filtration and consistency in medication and medical decision-making across the US.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: The University of California Preceptor Development Collaborative was established in 2022 across 5 academic medical centers and 3 schools of pharmacy. The collaborative aimed to streamline preceptor development efforts, enhance collaboration, and meet accreditation standards efficiently by providing quarterly preceptor development programming across all sites to residency and school preceptors. This article describes the implementation of the collaborative and assesses the number of attendees, attendee satisfaction, and cost during the pilot year.

Summary: During the pilot year, 5 live virtual preceptor development modules were developed for pharmacist preceptors. There were 631 credit hours claimed (196 from session 1, 106 from session 2, 68 from session 3, 123 from session 4, and 138 from session 5). Preceptor satisfaction, as measured from completed postsession evaluations (n = 704), was high (a median score of 5 on a Likert scale where 1 = none at all, 2 = a little, 3 = a moderate amount, 4 = a lot, and 5 = a great deal) for meeting educational, professional, teaching, or clinical needs. There was strong agreement (median score of 5 on Likert scale where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = somewhat agree, and 5 = strongly agree) that the modules improved knowledge, ability to change practice, and ability to have positive impacts on trainees and patients. The cost per attendee for this series was $1.58 per continuing education credit.

Conclusion: A multi-institution state-wide preceptor collaborative effort produced quarterly continuing education for residency and school of pharmacy preceptors who were affiliated with the sites. This approach to preceptor development is a convenient, satisfactory, and cost-effective method to deliver training for pharmacy preceptors.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: This article identifies, summarizes, and prioritizes literature on the ambulatory care medication-use process (ACMUP) published in 2022 that can describe ambulatory pharmacy practice. The medication-use process (MUP) is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment and was reimagined to focus on new innovations and advancements in ambulatory pharmacy practice. The ACMUP is defined in this article as having the following components: transitions of care, prescribing, access, dispensing, adherence, and evaluating. Articles evaluating at least one step of the ACMUP were assessed for their usefulness toward practice improvement.

Summary: A PubMed search for articles published in 2022 was conducted in January 2023 using targeted Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords and the table of contents of selected pharmacy journals, providing a total of 4,125 articles. A thorough review identified 49 potentially practice-enhancing articles: 6 for transitions of care, 9 for prescribing, 5 for access, 2 for dispensing, 6 for adherence, and 21 articles for evaluating. Trends from the impact articles are described.

Conclusion: It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice. This article continues a series of articles defining and evaluating the currently published literature around the ACMUP. As healthcare continues to advance and care shifts to ambulatory settings, the ACMUP will continue to be a crucial process to evaluate.

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: To optimize the hepatic dysfunction alert tool at our institution to identify appropriate patients and minimize irrelevant alerts.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective review included adults hospitalized over a 1-month period for whom a hepatic dysfunction alert fired for a medication order placed in the electronic health record. The existing alert determines hepatic dysfunction based on laboratory tests. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with an alert that was deemed to be clinically relevant. Alerts were considered relevant if the patient had a Child-Pugh score in class B or C and were ordered a medication with a hepatic warning from FDA or LiverTox. The performance of 14 alternative models was evaluated.

Results: A total of 1,541 alerts fired for 309 patients. Of these patients, 155 were randomly selected for the analysis, and the alert was deemed relevant in 86 patients (55%). Patients with relevant alerts were more likely to have documented liver disease and worsening measures on liver function tests. Of the alternative models evaluated, a model that excluded INR and albumin resulted in a 27% decrease in the number of alerts fired, of which 73% were relevant; however, it failed to identify 30% of patients with relevant hepatic dysfunction. None of the other models performed better.

Conclusion: The existing hepatic dysfunction clinical decision support tool correctly identifies patients with relevant hepatic dysfunction only 55% of the time. Alternative models were able to improve the rate of relevant results, but not without missing patients with relevant hepatic dysfunction.