Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742235
Robert E Murphy, Jane C Ibekwe, Stella I Ibekwe, Jerrie S Refuerzo
The objective of this study was to develop a structural-cognitive-behavioral model for error analysis of group B streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis failure, classify delivery cases into this model, and examine compliance with treatment guidelines. A retrospective, cohort study was conducted of women with liveborn pregnancies greater than 24 weeks in April 2018 at a single hospital. We created a structural-cognitive-behavioral model of five assessments for adherence to GBS prophylaxis guidelines and then classified these into four distinct error stages. A descriptive analysis was performed to determine if the pregnancy had a perfect process, a GBS prophylaxis failure, or a fortuitous outcome. There were 313 women who met the study criteria. The rate of GBS positive was 12.8%, negative 37.4%, and unknown 49.8%. The most common errors were cognitive perception errors related to incorrectly documenting GBS status, 57.7% ( N = 79). Of these errors, 15.2% ( N = 12) led to GBS prophylaxis failure. Perfect outcomes occurred in 62.7% ( N = 196) women, GBS prophylaxis failure occurred in 13.7% ( N = 43), and fortuitous outcomes occurred in 23.6% ( N = 74). In our study, we were able to identify structural, cognitive, and behavioral errors that contribute to GBS prophylaxis failures. In other cases, these errors may contribute to fortuitous outcomes.
{"title":"A Structural, Cognitive, and Behavioral Model for Error Analysis of Group B Streptococcus Prophylaxis in Pregnancy.","authors":"Robert E Murphy, Jane C Ibekwe, Stella I Ibekwe, Jerrie S Refuerzo","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop a structural-cognitive-behavioral model for error analysis of group B streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis failure, classify delivery cases into this model, and examine compliance with treatment guidelines. A retrospective, cohort study was conducted of women with liveborn pregnancies greater than 24 weeks in April 2018 at a single hospital. We created a structural-cognitive-behavioral model of five assessments for adherence to GBS prophylaxis guidelines and then classified these into four distinct error stages. A descriptive analysis was performed to determine if the pregnancy had a perfect process, a GBS prophylaxis failure, or a fortuitous outcome. There were 313 women who met the study criteria. The rate of GBS positive was 12.8%, negative 37.4%, and unknown 49.8%. The most common errors were cognitive perception errors related to incorrectly documenting GBS status, 57.7% ( <i>N</i> = 79). Of these errors, 15.2% ( <i>N</i> = 12) led to GBS prophylaxis failure. Perfect outcomes occurred in 62.7% ( <i>N</i> = 196) women, GBS prophylaxis failure occurred in 13.7% ( <i>N</i> = 43), and fortuitous outcomes occurred in 23.6% ( <i>N</i> = 74). In our study, we were able to identify structural, cognitive, and behavioral errors that contribute to GBS prophylaxis failures. In other cases, these errors may contribute to fortuitous outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e17-e26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/14/10-1055-s-0041-1742235.PMC8816629.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742236
Arlin Delgado, Jay Schulkin, Charles J Macri
Objective This survey study aimed to assess patient knowledge, clinical resources, and utilized resources about genetic screening and diagnostic testing. Study Design A one-time anonymous paper survey was distributed to 500 patients at a major urban obstetrics and gynecology department, and an online survey was sent to 229 providers. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. Results In all, 466 of 500 patient surveys were completed, and 441 analyzed (88.2% response rate). Among providers, 66 of 229 (29.0% response rate) responded. Patients were on average 32 years old, 27 weeks pregnant, and most often reported a graduate degree level of education (47.4%). Over 75% of patients reported accurate knowledge of basic genetic statements. Patients reported that discussing screening and diagnostic testing with their provider was significantly associated with properly defining screening and diagnostic testing ( p < 0.001). Less than 10% of patients reported providers distributing web/video links, books, or any other resource; however, patients most often independently accessed web links (40.1%). Conclusion Our findings suggest a positive impact from patient and provider discussions in office on patient knowledge and understanding. Discrepancies between educational resources distributed in the clinic and individually accessed resources highlight possible areas of change. Future work should evaluate and implement differing resources to increase patient knowledge.
{"title":"Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions.","authors":"Arlin Delgado, Jay Schulkin, Charles J Macri","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This survey study aimed to assess patient knowledge, clinical resources, and utilized resources about genetic screening and diagnostic testing. <b>Study Design</b> A one-time anonymous paper survey was distributed to 500 patients at a major urban obstetrics and gynecology department, and an online survey was sent to 229 providers. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. <b>Results</b> In all, 466 of 500 patient surveys were completed, and 441 analyzed (88.2% response rate). Among providers, 66 of 229 (29.0% response rate) responded. Patients were on average 32 years old, 27 weeks pregnant, and most often reported a graduate degree level of education (47.4%). Over 75% of patients reported accurate knowledge of basic genetic statements. Patients reported that discussing screening and diagnostic testing with their provider was significantly associated with properly defining screening and diagnostic testing ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). Less than 10% of patients reported providers distributing web/video links, books, or any other resource; however, patients most often independently accessed web links (40.1%). <b>Conclusion</b> Our findings suggest a positive impact from patient and provider discussions in office on patient knowledge and understanding. Discrepancies between educational resources distributed in the clinic and individually accessed resources highlight possible areas of change. Future work should evaluate and implement differing resources to increase patient knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e27-e32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/61/10-1055-s-0041-1742236.PMC8816620.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742268
Chase R Cawyer, Christina Blanchard, Kenneth H Kim
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a financial literacy curriculum on resident and fellow's sense of well-being and financial stress. Study Design This single institution pilot study prospectively enrolled obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) medical trainees (residents and fellows) to take part in a five-part personal financial literacy curriculum during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. Topics covered included the following: financial education and its relationship to personal well-being, overview of financial terms and principles, budgeting, debt planning, and investing and giving. Primary outcomes were the improvement in well-being as measured by the Expanded Well-Being Index (E-WBI) and financial stress as measured by the Financial Stress Scale-College Version (FSS-CV) survey. Results Of the 35 residents and fellows who participated in the study, 21 (60%) completed the postintervention survey. After course completion, there was significant improvement in the individual's E-WBI ( p < 0.05) and no significant improvement in their FSS-CV ( p = 0.06). After completing the course, trainees agreed that financial literacy improved their sense of well-being ( p = 0.018). Conclusion Cultivating financial literacy is associated with an improvement in the sense of well-being in residents and fellows and should be considered for inclusion in other graduate medical education (GME) programs.
摘要目的探讨金融素养课程对住院医师和实习医师幸福感和财务压力的影响。这项单机构试点研究前瞻性地招募了产科/妇科(OB/GYN)医学实习生(住院医师和研究员),在2019至2020学年参加五部分的个人理财知识课程。课程的主题包括:财务教育及其与个人幸福的关系、财务术语和原则概述、预算、债务计划、投资和给予。主要结果是通过扩展幸福指数(E-WBI)和财务压力量表-大学版(FSS-CV)调查测量的幸福感的改善。结果在35名住院医师和研究员中,21人(60%)完成了干预后调查。课程结束后,个体的E-WBI有显著改善(p p = 0.06)。完成课程后,学员同意金融知识提高了他们的幸福感(p = 0.018)。结论培养金融知识与提高住院医师和研究员的幸福感有关,应考虑将其纳入其他研究生医学教育(GME)项目。
{"title":"Financial Literacy and Physician Wellness: Can a Financial Curriculum Improve an Obstetrician/Gynecologist Resident and Fellow's Well-Being?","authors":"Chase R Cawyer, Christina Blanchard, Kenneth H Kim","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a financial literacy curriculum on resident and fellow's sense of well-being and financial stress. <b>Study Design</b> This single institution pilot study prospectively enrolled obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) medical trainees (residents and fellows) to take part in a five-part personal financial literacy curriculum during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. Topics covered included the following: financial education and its relationship to personal well-being, overview of financial terms and principles, budgeting, debt planning, and investing and giving. Primary outcomes were the improvement in well-being as measured by the Expanded Well-Being Index (E-WBI) and financial stress as measured by the Financial Stress Scale-College Version (FSS-CV) survey. <b>Results</b> Of the 35 residents and fellows who participated in the study, 21 (60%) completed the postintervention survey. After course completion, there was significant improvement in the individual's E-WBI ( <i>p</i> < 0.05) and no significant improvement in their FSS-CV ( <i>p</i> = 0.06). After completing the course, trainees agreed that financial literacy improved their sense of well-being ( <i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusion</b> Cultivating financial literacy is associated with an improvement in the sense of well-being in residents and fellows and should be considered for inclusion in other graduate medical education (GME) programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e64-e68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/dc/10-1055-s-0041-1742268.PMC8816634.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39766916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741540
Catherine M Caponero, Dani G Zoorob, Victor Heh, Hind N Moussa
Objective The objective of this study was to measure the impact of video education at the time of admission for delivery on intent and participation in skin-to-skin contact (SSC) immediately after birth. Methods This study was a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention in women ( N = 240) of 18 years or older admitted in anticipation of normal spontaneous term delivery. Alternate patients were randomized into video ( N = 120) and no video ( N = 120) groups. Both groups received a survey about SSC. The video group watched an educational DVD and completed a postsurvey about SSC. Results During the preintervention survey, 89.2% of those in the video group compared with 83.3% of those in the no video group indicated that they planned to use SSC ( p = 0.396). After the video, 98.3% planned to do SSC after delivery ( p < 0.001). However, only 59.8% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the video group and only 49.4% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the no video group ( p = 0.17). Conclusion Video education alters the intention and trends toward participation in SSC within 5 minutes of delivery. Despite the plans for SSC, however, there was no significant difference in rates between the two groups. These findings support that obstacles, other than prenatal education, may affect early SSC. Key Points Significant obstacles impact skin-to-skin rate.Video education alters skin-to-skin intent.Video education can improve skin-to-skin rate.Education can happen at the time of delivery.Video education can impact mothers and infants.
{"title":"The Effect of Video Education on Skin-to-Skin Contact at the Time of Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Catherine M Caponero, Dani G Zoorob, Victor Heh, Hind N Moussa","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1741540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> The objective of this study was to measure the impact of video education at the time of admission for delivery on intent and participation in skin-to-skin contact (SSC) immediately after birth. <b>Methods</b> This study was a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention in women ( <i>N</i> = 240) of 18 years or older admitted in anticipation of normal spontaneous term delivery. Alternate patients were randomized into video ( <i>N</i> = 120) and no video ( <i>N</i> = 120) groups. Both groups received a survey about SSC. The video group watched an educational DVD and completed a postsurvey about SSC. <b>Results</b> During the preintervention survey, 89.2% of those in the video group compared with 83.3% of those in the no video group indicated that they planned to use SSC ( <i>p</i> = 0.396). After the video, 98.3% planned to do SSC after delivery ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, only 59.8% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the video group and only 49.4% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the no video group ( <i>p</i> = 0.17). <b>Conclusion</b> Video education alters the intention and trends toward participation in SSC within 5 minutes of delivery. Despite the plans for SSC, however, there was no significant difference in rates between the two groups. These findings support that obstacles, other than prenatal education, may affect early SSC. <b>Key Points</b> Significant obstacles impact skin-to-skin rate.Video education alters skin-to-skin intent.Video education can improve skin-to-skin rate.Education can happen at the time of delivery.Video education can impact mothers and infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e10-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/1b/10-1055-s-0041-1741540.PMC8816630.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742270
Ernesto A Figueiro-Filho, Na T S Robinson, Jose Carvalho, Johannes Keunen, Monique Robinson, Cynthia Maxwell
Objective This study aimed to identify cardiovascular differences between pregnant people with and without obesity for trimester-specific changes in hemodynamic parameters using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM). Study Design This study is a pilot prospective comparative cohort between pregnant people with and without obesity. Hemodynamic assessment was performed with NICOM (12-14, 21-23, and 34-36 weeks) during pregnancy. Results In first trimester, pregnant people with obesity had higher blood pressure, stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), and cardiac output (CO). Pregnant people with obesity continued to have higher SV and cardiac index (second and third trimesters). During the first trimester, body mass index (BMI) positively correlated with SV, TPRI, and CO. Fat mass showed a strong correlation with TPRI. BMI positively correlated with CO during the second trimester and fat mass was positively associated with CO. During the third trimester, TPR negatively correlated with BMI and fat mass. Conclusion Fat mass gain in the period between the first and second trimesters in addition to the hemodynamic changes due to obesity and pregnancy contribute to some degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction which was manifested by lower SVs. Future work should investigate the possible causative role of obesity in the cardiovascular changes identified in people with obesity.
{"title":"Hemodynamic Assessment of Pregnant People with and without Obesity by Noninvasive Bioreactance: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Ernesto A Figueiro-Filho, Na T S Robinson, Jose Carvalho, Johannes Keunen, Monique Robinson, Cynthia Maxwell","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This study aimed to identify cardiovascular differences between pregnant people with and without obesity for trimester-specific changes in hemodynamic parameters using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM). <b>Study Design</b> This study is a pilot prospective comparative cohort between pregnant people with and without obesity. Hemodynamic assessment was performed with NICOM (12-14, 21-23, and 34-36 weeks) during pregnancy. <b>Results</b> In first trimester, pregnant people with obesity had higher blood pressure, stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), and cardiac output (CO). Pregnant people with obesity continued to have higher SV and cardiac index (second and third trimesters). During the first trimester, body mass index (BMI) positively correlated with SV, TPRI, and CO. Fat mass showed a strong correlation with TPRI. BMI positively correlated with CO during the second trimester and fat mass was positively associated with CO. During the third trimester, TPR negatively correlated with BMI and fat mass. <b>Conclusion</b> Fat mass gain in the period between the first and second trimesters in addition to the hemodynamic changes due to obesity and pregnancy contribute to some degree of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction which was manifested by lower SVs. Future work should investigate the possible causative role of obesity in the cardiovascular changes identified in people with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e69-e75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/c5/10-1055-s-0041-1742270.PMC8816622.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39766917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742267
Robert L Thurer, Sahar Doctorvaladan, Brendan Carvalho, Andrea T Jelks
Objective This study examined the accuracy, sources of error, and limitations of gravimetric quantification of blood loss (QBL) during cesarean delivery. Study Design Blood loss determined by assays of the hemoglobin content on surgical sponges and in suction canisters was compared with QBL in 50 parturients. Results QBL was moderately correlated to the actual blood loss ( r = 0.564; p < 0.001). Compared with the reference assay, QBL overestimated blood loss for 44 patients (88%). QBL deviated from the assayed blood loss by more than 250 mL in 34 patients (68%) and by more than 500 mL in 16 cases (32%). Assayed blood loss was more than 1,000 mL in four patients. For three of these patients, QBL was more than 1,000 mL (sensitivity = 75%). QBL was more than 1,000 mL in 12 patients. While three of these had an assayed blood loss of more than 1,000 mL, 9 of the 46 patients with blood losses of less than 1,000 mL by the assay (20%) were incorrectly identified as having postpartum hemorrhage by QBL (false positives). The specificity of quantitative QBL for detection of blood loss more than or equal to 1,000 mL was 80.4%. Conclusion QBL was only moderately correlated with the reference assay. While overestimation was more common than underestimation, both occurred. Moreover, QBL was particularly inaccurate when substantial bleeding occurred. Key Points QBL is inaccurate in cesarean delivery.QBL deviated from the assay result by more than 500 mL in 32% of cases.QBL sensitivity and specificity for hemorrhage is 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.93) and 80.4% (95% CI: 0.69-0.92), respectively.
{"title":"Limitations of Gravimetric Quantitative Blood Loss during Cesarean Delivery.","authors":"Robert L Thurer, Sahar Doctorvaladan, Brendan Carvalho, Andrea T Jelks","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> This study examined the accuracy, sources of error, and limitations of gravimetric quantification of blood loss (QBL) during cesarean delivery. <b>Study Design</b> Blood loss determined by assays of the hemoglobin content on surgical sponges and in suction canisters was compared with QBL in 50 parturients. <b>Results</b> QBL was moderately correlated to the actual blood loss ( <i>r</i> = 0.564; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared with the reference assay, QBL overestimated blood loss for 44 patients (88%). QBL deviated from the assayed blood loss by more than 250 mL in 34 patients (68%) and by more than 500 mL in 16 cases (32%). Assayed blood loss was more than 1,000 mL in four patients. For three of these patients, QBL was more than 1,000 mL (sensitivity = 75%). QBL was more than 1,000 mL in 12 patients. While three of these had an assayed blood loss of more than 1,000 mL, 9 of the 46 patients with blood losses of less than 1,000 mL by the assay (20%) were incorrectly identified as having postpartum hemorrhage by QBL (false positives). The specificity of quantitative QBL for detection of blood loss more than or equal to 1,000 mL was 80.4%. <b>Conclusion</b> QBL was only moderately correlated with the reference assay. While overestimation was more common than underestimation, both occurred. Moreover, QBL was particularly inaccurate when substantial bleeding occurred. <b>Key Points</b> QBL is inaccurate in cesarean delivery.QBL deviated from the assay result by more than 500 mL in 32% of cases.QBL sensitivity and specificity for hemorrhage is 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.93) and 80.4% (95% CI: 0.69-0.92), respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e36-e40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/83/10-1055-s-0041-1742267.PMC8816625.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742269
Megan S Varvoutis, Azza E Abdalla, Sarah K Dotters-Katz
Objective The effect of the degree of maternal fever in the setting of chorioamnionitis on neonatal morbidity is unclear. The objective of this study is to assess the association between high maternal fevers (≥ 39°C) on neonatal morbidity. Study Design Secondary analysis of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Cesarean Registry data obtained from 1999 to 2002 among singleton gestations with chorioamnionitis. Women with a temperature less than 39°C (low fever) compared with those with greater than or equal to 39°C (high fever). Primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes such as death, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, grade-3 or -4 intraventricular hemorrhage, seizure within 24 hours of delivery, intubation within 24 hours of delivery, and requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Demographic characteristics compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with performed to control for cofounders. Stratified analysis also performed to assess outcomes in term infants. Results Of 1,313 included women, 1,200 (91.3%) were in the low fever group and 113 (8.7%) were in the high fever group. Women in the high fever group were more likely to be African American and group B Streptococcus positive. No difference in primary outcome was noted between the groups (38.9% high fever vs. 35.8% low fever, p = 0.54). High maternal fever was associated with increased risk of NICU admission (48.1 vs. 50.4%, p = 0.02). When controlling for African American race, preterm birth, and delivery route, patients with high fever were not more likely to have adverse neonatal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 1.98). In the analysis limited to term infants, when controlling for confounders, high fever, similarly, was not associated with increased odds of adverse neonatal outcomes (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.96, 2.65). Conclusion The degree of maternal fever does not appear to be associated with an increased likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes. Better understanding maternal factors that affect neonatal morbidity in the setting of chorioamnionitis is critical. Key Points High maternal fever in the setting of chorioamnionitis does not appear to have an increased likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes.It is important to identify factors that may increase the risk of adverse outcomes such as early onset sepsis.Maternal fever may not be a strong indicator for neonatal outcomes and antibiotic protocols.
目的探讨绒毛膜羊膜炎时产妇发热程度对新生儿发病率的影响。本研究的目的是评估产妇高热(≥39°C)与新生儿发病率之间的关系。研究设计:对1999年至2002年绒毛膜羊膜炎单胎妊娠剖宫产登记数据进行二次分析。体温低于39°C(低热)与高于或等于39°C(高热)的女性进行比较。主要结局是新生儿不良结局的综合,如死亡、败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎、3级或4级脑室内出血、分娩后24小时内癫痫发作、分娩后24小时内插管、需要心肺复苏。人口统计学特征比较使用Fisher精确和Wilcoxon秩和检验。采用多变量logistic回归分析对联合创始人进行控制。还进行了分层分析,以评估足月婴儿的预后。结果1313例女性中,低热组1200例(91.3%),高热组113例(8.7%)。高热组的女性更有可能是非裔美国人和B组链球菌阳性。两组间主要转归无差异(38.9%高热vs 35.8%低热,p = 0.54)。产妇高热与新生儿重症监护病房入院风险增加相关(48.1% vs 50.4%, p = 0.02)。当控制非裔美国人种族、早产和分娩方式时,高热患者不太可能出现不良新生儿结局(调整优势比[aOR] = 1.28, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.84, 1.98)。在仅限于足月婴儿的分析中,当控制混杂因素时,高热同样与新生儿不良结局的几率增加无关(aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.96, 2.65)。结论产妇发热程度似乎与新生儿不良结局的可能性增加无关。更好地了解在绒毛膜羊膜炎的情况下影响新生儿发病率的母体因素是至关重要的。在绒毛膜羊膜炎的背景下,产妇高热似乎没有增加不良新生儿结局的可能性。重要的是要确定可能增加不良后果风险的因素,如早发性败血症。产妇发热可能不是新生儿结局和抗生素方案的有力指标。
{"title":"Does the Degree of Maternal Fever in the Setting of Chorioamnionitis Lead to Adverse Neonatal Outcomes?","authors":"Megan S Varvoutis, Azza E Abdalla, Sarah K Dotters-Katz","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> The effect of the degree of maternal fever in the setting of chorioamnionitis on neonatal morbidity is unclear. The objective of this study is to assess the association between high maternal fevers (≥ 39°C) on neonatal morbidity. <b>Study Design</b> Secondary analysis of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Cesarean Registry data obtained from 1999 to 2002 among singleton gestations with chorioamnionitis. Women with a temperature less than 39°C (low fever) compared with those with greater than or equal to 39°C (high fever). Primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes such as death, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, grade-3 or -4 intraventricular hemorrhage, seizure within 24 hours of delivery, intubation within 24 hours of delivery, and requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Demographic characteristics compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with performed to control for cofounders. Stratified analysis also performed to assess outcomes in term infants. <b>Results</b> Of 1,313 included women, 1,200 (91.3%) were in the low fever group and 113 (8.7%) were in the high fever group. Women in the high fever group were more likely to be African American and group B <i>Streptococcus</i> positive. No difference in primary outcome was noted between the groups (38.9% high fever vs. 35.8% low fever, <i>p</i> = 0.54). High maternal fever was associated with increased risk of NICU admission (48.1 vs. 50.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). When controlling for African American race, preterm birth, and delivery route, patients with high fever were not more likely to have adverse neonatal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 1.98). In the analysis limited to term infants, when controlling for confounders, high fever, similarly, was not associated with increased odds of adverse neonatal outcomes (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.96, 2.65). <b>Conclusion</b> The degree of maternal fever does not appear to be associated with an increased likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes. Better understanding maternal factors that affect neonatal morbidity in the setting of chorioamnionitis is critical. <b>Key Points</b> High maternal fever in the setting of chorioamnionitis does not appear to have an increased likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes.It is important to identify factors that may increase the risk of adverse outcomes such as early onset sepsis.Maternal fever may not be a strong indicator for neonatal outcomes and antibiotic protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e58-e63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/4e/10-1055-s-0041-1742269.PMC8816624.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742237
Ashley Allen, Christine Hoang, Roopina Sangha
Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring and D-dimer can be used to recognize COVID-19-induced coagulopathy, but the utility of these is largely unknown in the peripartum setting and leaves anticoagulation guidance unclear. We present the case of a critically ill postpartum patient with COVID-19 infection. This patient presented with clinical signs of COVID-19 infection and developed acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and subsequent cesarean delivery at 34 weeks. She initially improved postoperatively but deteriorated after postoperative day 5. She was found to have a very elevated D-dimer of 58 μg/mL and anticoagulation was escalated to full dosing. She required prolonged mechanical ventilation and deceased after developing gram-positive cocci bacteremia. This case demonstrates that recognition and management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy can be confusing in the peripartum period and studies are needed to validate D-dimer and SIC scoring in this population of patients.
{"title":"COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy in the Peripartum Setting: A Case Report.","authors":"Ashley Allen, Christine Hoang, Roopina Sangha","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring and D-dimer can be used to recognize COVID-19-induced coagulopathy, but the utility of these is largely unknown in the peripartum setting and leaves anticoagulation guidance unclear. We present the case of a critically ill postpartum patient with COVID-19 infection. This patient presented with clinical signs of COVID-19 infection and developed acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and subsequent cesarean delivery at 34 weeks. She initially improved postoperatively but deteriorated after postoperative day 5. She was found to have a very elevated D-dimer of 58 μg/mL and anticoagulation was escalated to full dosing. She required prolonged mechanical ventilation and deceased after developing gram-positive cocci bacteremia. This case demonstrates that recognition and management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy can be confusing in the peripartum period and studies are needed to validate D-dimer and SIC scoring in this population of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e33-e35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/7a/10-1055-s-0041-1742237.PMC8816627.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-04eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742272
Khyla Burrows, Jeanelle Sheeder, Virginia Lijewski, Teresa Harper
Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the maternal conditions for which preconception services are provided and the routine services and recommendations offered through the Maternal Fetal Medicine group at the University of Colorado (CU). The study sought to determine how services and recommendations differ by maternal condition, demographics, and reproductive health history. Materials and Methods Charts of patients who received preconception counseling through the CU MFM department during 2018 were reviewed to evaluate maternal conditions and the type of counseling patients received. Patients were grouped by their referral reason and subsequently by counseling recommendations to either proceed with immediate conception, defer immediate conception pending completion of further recommendations or to not conceive. Results Of the fifty-nine patients referred to preconception counseling, 52% ( n = 31) of the women were referred for maternal disease, 40% ( n = 24) for infertility, 32% ( n = 19) for previous poor obstetric outcomes, 30% ( n = 18) for advanced maternal age and finally, 15% ( n = 9) for gynecologic anatomic abnormalities. Conclusion During the initial evaluation, 58% ( n = 34) of patients were determined to have no concern for immediate conception while 7% ( n = 4) were ultimately advised to not conceive. Using this data, we identified areas of preconception counseling that standardization will improve by ensuring patients receive comparable services and advice.
{"title":"Preconception Counseling: Identifying Ways to Improve Services.","authors":"Khyla Burrows, Jeanelle Sheeder, Virginia Lijewski, Teresa Harper","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the maternal conditions for which preconception services are provided and the routine services and recommendations offered through the Maternal Fetal Medicine group at the University of Colorado (CU). The study sought to determine how services and recommendations differ by maternal condition, demographics, and reproductive health history. <b>Materials and Methods</b> Charts of patients who received preconception counseling through the CU MFM department during 2018 were reviewed to evaluate maternal conditions and the type of counseling patients received. Patients were grouped by their referral reason and subsequently by counseling recommendations to either proceed with immediate conception, defer immediate conception pending completion of further recommendations or to not conceive. <b>Results</b> Of the fifty-nine patients referred to preconception counseling, 52% ( <i>n</i> = 31) of the women were referred for maternal disease, 40% ( <i>n</i> = 24) for infertility, 32% ( <i>n</i> = 19) for previous poor obstetric outcomes, 30% ( <i>n</i> = 18) for advanced maternal age and finally, 15% ( <i>n</i> = 9) for gynecologic anatomic abnormalities. <b>Conclusion</b> During the initial evaluation, 58% ( <i>n</i> = 34) of patients were determined to have no concern for immediate conception while 7% ( <i>n</i> = 4) were ultimately advised to not conceive. Using this data, we identified areas of preconception counseling that standardization will improve by ensuring patients receive comparable services and advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e49-e57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/d5/10-1055-s-0041-1742272.PMC8816632.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Esophageal perforation in premature infants is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt treatment. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is recommended for diagnosis. However, it is difficult to obtain CECT images in premature infants because of their unstable conditions. We encountered a case of esophageal perforation in an extremely-low-birth-weight female infant. Bedside ultrasonography was useful in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of leakage in the mediastinum. Ultrasonography can be a useful modality for the evaluation of perforation of the lower part of the esophagus in premature infants.
{"title":"Bedside Ultrasonography in Evaluating Mediastinum Leakage in an Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infant with Esophageal Perforation.","authors":"Mitsuhiro Haga, Yumiko Sato, Tomo Kakihara, Wakako Sumiya, Masayuki Kanno, Tetsuya Ishimaru, Masaki Shimizu, Hiroshi Kawashima","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1741538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal perforation in premature infants is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt treatment. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is recommended for diagnosis. However, it is difficult to obtain CECT images in premature infants because of their unstable conditions. We encountered a case of esophageal perforation in an extremely-low-birth-weight female infant. Bedside ultrasonography was useful in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of leakage in the mediastinum. Ultrasonography can be a useful modality for the evaluation of perforation of the lower part of the esophagus in premature infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"e76-e79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/fc/10-1055-s-0041-1741538.PMC8816637.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39766918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}