Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231196912
Matthew R Bright, Yasmin Endlich, Zachary Dj King, Leigh D White, Sandra I Concha Blamey, Martin D Culwick
There were 684 perioperative cardiac arrests reported to webAIRS between September 2009 and March 2022. The majority involved patients older than 60 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 3 to 5, undergoing an emergency or major procedure. The most common precipitants included airway events, cardiovascular events, massive blood loss. medication issues, and sepsis. The highest mortality rate was 54% of the 46 cases in the miscellaneous category (this included 34 cases of severe sepsis, which had a mortality of 65%). This was followed by cardiovascular precipitants (n = 424) in which there were 147 deaths (35% mortality): these precipitants included blood loss (53%), embolism (61%) and myocardial infarction (70%). Airway and breathing events accounted for 25% and anaphylaxis 8%. A specialist anaesthetist attended the majority of these cardiac arrests. As webAIRS is a voluntary database, it is not possible to determine the incidence of perioperative cardiac arrest and only descriptive information on factors associated with cardiac arrest can be obtained. Nevertheless, the large number of reports includes a wide range of cases, precipitants, demographics and outcomes, providing ample opportunity to learn from these events. The data also provide rich scope for further research into further initiatives to prevent cardiac arrest in the perioperative period, and to improve outcomes, should a cardiac arrest occur.
{"title":"Adult perioperative cardiac arrest: An overview of 684 cases reported to webAIRS.","authors":"Matthew R Bright, Yasmin Endlich, Zachary Dj King, Leigh D White, Sandra I Concha Blamey, Martin D Culwick","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231196912","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0310057X231196912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There were 684 perioperative cardiac arrests reported to webAIRS between September 2009 and March 2022. The majority involved patients older than 60 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 3 to 5, undergoing an emergency or major procedure. The most common precipitants included airway events, cardiovascular events, massive blood loss. medication issues, and sepsis. The highest mortality rate was 54% of the 46 cases in the miscellaneous category (this included 34 cases of severe sepsis, which had a mortality of 65%). This was followed by cardiovascular precipitants (<i>n</i> = 424) in which there were 147 deaths (35% mortality): these precipitants included blood loss (53%), embolism (61%) and myocardial infarction (70%). Airway and breathing events accounted for 25% and anaphylaxis 8%. A specialist anaesthetist attended the majority of these cardiac arrests. As webAIRS is a voluntary database, it is not possible to determine the incidence of perioperative cardiac arrest and only descriptive information on factors associated with cardiac arrest can be obtained. Nevertheless, the large number of reports includes a wide range of cases, precipitants, demographics and outcomes, providing ample opportunity to learn from these events. The data also provide rich scope for further research into further initiatives to prevent cardiac arrest in the perioperative period, and to improve outcomes, should a cardiac arrest occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"375-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604388/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41106839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-09-22DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231196915
Victoria A Eley, Martin D Culwick, Alicia T Dennis
Anaesthesia for caesarean section occurs commonly and places specific demands on anaesthetists. We analysed 469 narratives concerning anaesthesia for caesarean section, entered by Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists into the webAIRS incident reporting system between 2009 and 2022. As expected, compared with the remaining 8978 database entries, the 469 incidents were more likely to be emergency cases (relative risk (RR) 1.95), more likely to occur between 18:00 and 22:00 hours (RR 1.81) and between 22:00 and 07:59 hours (RR 4.40) and more likely to be undertaken using neuraxial anaesthesia (RR 9.18). Most incidents involved more than one event. The most commonly reported incidents included intraoperative neuraxial anaesthesia complications (180, 38%), medication errors or issues (136, 29%), equipment issues (49, 10%), obstetric haemorrhage (38, 8%), maternal cardiac arrests (28, 6%), endotracheal tube issues (28, 6%) and neonatal resuscitation (24, 5%). Inadequate neuraxial block, reported in 95 incidents, was the most common intraoperative neuraxial complication. Allergic reactions, reported in 30 incidents, were the most common medication issue, followed by 17 associated with oxytocin and 16 syringe swaps. Thirty-eight reports included significant maternal haemorrhage, with eight of those incidents including maternal cardiac arrest. There was one maternal death and eight incidents with neonatal deaths reported, affecting nine neonates. Problems with intraoperative neuraxial anaesthesia were the most commonly reported events. Implementation of specific strategies are encouraged to enhance preparation for conversion to general anaesthesia and to mitigate medication errors, particularly those relating to oxytocic use and neuraxial anaesthesia medications.
{"title":"Analysis of anaesthesia incidents during caesarean section reported to webAIRS between 2009 and 2022.","authors":"Victoria A Eley, Martin D Culwick, Alicia T Dennis","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231196915","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0310057X231196915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaesthesia for caesarean section occurs commonly and places specific demands on anaesthetists. We analysed 469 narratives concerning anaesthesia for caesarean section, entered by Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists into the webAIRS incident reporting system between 2009 and 2022. As expected, compared with the remaining 8978 database entries, the 469 incidents were more likely to be emergency cases (relative risk (RR) 1.95), more likely to occur between 18:00 and 22:00 hours (RR 1.81) and between 22:00 and 07:59 hours (RR 4.40) and more likely to be undertaken using neuraxial anaesthesia (RR 9.18). Most incidents involved more than one event. The most commonly reported incidents included intraoperative neuraxial anaesthesia complications (180, 38%), medication errors or issues (136, 29%), equipment issues (49, 10%), obstetric haemorrhage (38, 8%), maternal cardiac arrests (28, 6%), endotracheal tube issues (28, 6%) and neonatal resuscitation (24, 5%). Inadequate neuraxial block, reported in 95 incidents, was the most common intraoperative neuraxial complication. Allergic reactions, reported in 30 incidents, were the most common medication issue, followed by 17 associated with oxytocin and 16 syringe swaps. Thirty-eight reports included significant maternal haemorrhage, with eight of those incidents including maternal cardiac arrest. There was one maternal death and eight incidents with neonatal deaths reported, affecting nine neonates. Problems with intraoperative neuraxial anaesthesia were the most commonly reported events. Implementation of specific strategies are encouraged to enhance preparation for conversion to general anaesthesia and to mitigate medication errors, particularly those relating to oxytocic use and neuraxial anaesthesia medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41092582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231202616
Dr Lip Yong, Choo, Dr Nathan Peters, Dr Frances Williamson, Ms Michelle Bauer, Dr Peter Snelling, Prof Nicole Marsh, Ms Stacey Llewellyn, Dr Adam Stewart, Dr Patrick Harris, Claire Richard, Dr Chang Chuan, Melvin Lee, Dr Lalitha Manickam, Dr Suresh Paranjothy, Dr Swapna Thampi, AProf, Lian Kah Ti, Dr Emily Balmaks, Dr Richard Seglenieks, Dr Fumitaka Yanase, Dr Varun Peri, Dr Michael Jiang, Mr Qui, Rui Soh, Dr Shervin Tosif, Prof Rinaldo Bellomo, Professor Laurence Weinberg, Dr Darren Lowen, Dr Nicole Sheridan, Mark Tacey, Dr Russell Hodgson, F. McGain
Obesity during pregnancy is an evolving global epidemic associated with poor maternal and foetal outcomes. 1 This is a pilot audit at KEMH, WA’s maternity hospital, evaluating the anaesthetic practice involving parturients with BMI (cid:1) 50 kg/m 2 against institutional policy. The clinical standards measured are:
{"title":"Selected prize abstracts from the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Annual Scientific Meeting and the Obstetric Anaesthesia SIG Satellite Meeting, May 2023, Sydney, Australia","authors":"Dr Lip Yong, Choo, Dr Nathan Peters, Dr Frances Williamson, Ms Michelle Bauer, Dr Peter Snelling, Prof Nicole Marsh, Ms Stacey Llewellyn, Dr Adam Stewart, Dr Patrick Harris, Claire Richard, Dr Chang Chuan, Melvin Lee, Dr Lalitha Manickam, Dr Suresh Paranjothy, Dr Swapna Thampi, AProf, Lian Kah Ti, Dr Emily Balmaks, Dr Richard Seglenieks, Dr Fumitaka Yanase, Dr Varun Peri, Dr Michael Jiang, Mr Qui, Rui Soh, Dr Shervin Tosif, Prof Rinaldo Bellomo, Professor Laurence Weinberg, Dr Darren Lowen, Dr Nicole Sheridan, Mark Tacey, Dr Russell Hodgson, F. McGain","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231202616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231202616","url":null,"abstract":"Obesity during pregnancy is an evolving global epidemic associated with poor maternal and foetal outcomes. 1 This is a pilot audit at KEMH, WA’s maternity hospital, evaluating the anaesthetic practice involving parturients with BMI (cid:1) 50 kg/m 2 against institutional policy. The clinical standards measured are:","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139328820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231204504
Edward Coxon, Daniel Winter, Fangbo Ge, Rebecca Hong, Anna Langford, Aihua Wu, Zoe Keon-Cohen, Heather Loane, Lorena Romano, Jane Banazak-Holl, Daryl Jones, Philip Cornish, Annie Cornish, South Australia, Christine Wood, Elizabeth Hall, Daniel Mattingley, Ross Kennedy, K. Huilgol, Michelle Cranna, Phillip Harford, Pamela Macintyre, Sarah Flint, R. V. Wijk, V. Thiruvenkatarajan, Catherine Kwak, Young Eun Koo, Matthew J Boyle, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Kerry Chen, Peter Forrest, Michelle Howe, Yee Chong, Justin Payne, Boris Waldman, Tara Lawson, Thomas Charles Lang, Shady Mikhail, Kimberley J. Davis, Natalie Smith
These abstracts are published as supplied and have not been subject to editorial review or significant correction. For some abstracts the figure(s) and/or table(s) were not able to be exported from the documents provided to the Journal and have therefore not been included. The content of some listed abstracts was missing entirely so these have been necessarily omitted from the publication.
{"title":"Abstracts of the New Zealand Society of Anaesthetists and Australian Society of Anaesthetists Combined Scientific Congress, 21–24 October 2022, Wellington, New Zealand","authors":"Edward Coxon, Daniel Winter, Fangbo Ge, Rebecca Hong, Anna Langford, Aihua Wu, Zoe Keon-Cohen, Heather Loane, Lorena Romano, Jane Banazak-Holl, Daryl Jones, Philip Cornish, Annie Cornish, South Australia, Christine Wood, Elizabeth Hall, Daniel Mattingley, Ross Kennedy, K. Huilgol, Michelle Cranna, Phillip Harford, Pamela Macintyre, Sarah Flint, R. V. Wijk, V. Thiruvenkatarajan, Catherine Kwak, Young Eun Koo, Matthew J Boyle, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Kerry Chen, Peter Forrest, Michelle Howe, Yee Chong, Justin Payne, Boris Waldman, Tara Lawson, Thomas Charles Lang, Shady Mikhail, Kimberley J. Davis, Natalie Smith","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231204504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231204504","url":null,"abstract":"These abstracts are published as supplied and have not been subject to editorial review or significant correction. For some abstracts the figure(s) and/or table(s) were not able to be exported from the documents provided to the Journal and have therefore not been included. The content of some listed abstracts was missing entirely so these have been necessarily omitted from the publication.","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"7 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139325085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X221147066
Shania Liu, Jennifer A Stevens, Ashleigh E Collins, Jed Duff, Joanna R Sutherland, Morgan D Oddie, Justine M Naylor, Asad E Patanwala, Benita M Suckling, Jonathan Penm
Opioid analgesics are commonly used by patients awaiting orthopaedic surgery, and preoperative opioid use is associated with a greater burden of postoperative pain, suboptimal surgical outcomes and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of total opioid use before elective orthopaedic surgery with a focus on regional and rural hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. This was a cross-sectional, observational study of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 across five hospitals that included a mix of metropolitan, regional, rural, private and public settings. Preoperative patient demographics, pain scores and analgesic use were collected during pre-admission clinic visits, held between two and six weeks before surgery. Of the 430 patients included, 229 (53.3%) were women and the mean age was 67.5 (standard deviation 10.1) years. The overall prevalence of total preoperative opioid use was 37.7% (162/430). Rates of preoperative opioid use ranged from 20.6% (13/63) at a metropolitan hospital to 48.8% (21/43) at an inner regional hospital. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the inner regional setting was a significant predictor of opioid use before orthopaedic surgery (adjusted odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.7) after adjusting for covariates. Opioid use prior to orthopaedic surgery is common and appears to vary by geographical location.
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of opioid use before orthopaedic surgery in an Australian setting: A multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study.","authors":"Shania Liu, Jennifer A Stevens, Ashleigh E Collins, Jed Duff, Joanna R Sutherland, Morgan D Oddie, Justine M Naylor, Asad E Patanwala, Benita M Suckling, Jonathan Penm","doi":"10.1177/0310057X221147066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X221147066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid analgesics are commonly used by patients awaiting orthopaedic surgery, and preoperative opioid use is associated with a greater burden of postoperative pain, suboptimal surgical outcomes and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of total opioid use before elective orthopaedic surgery with a focus on regional and rural hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. This was a cross-sectional, observational study of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 across five hospitals that included a mix of metropolitan, regional, rural, private and public settings. Preoperative patient demographics, pain scores and analgesic use were collected during pre-admission clinic visits, held between two and six weeks before surgery. Of the 430 patients included, 229 (53.3%) were women and the mean age was 67.5 (standard deviation 10.1) years. The overall prevalence of total preoperative opioid use was 37.7% (162/430). Rates of preoperative opioid use ranged from 20.6% (13/63) at a metropolitan hospital to 48.8% (21/43) at an inner regional hospital. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the inner regional setting was a significant predictor of opioid use before orthopaedic surgery (adjusted odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.7) after adjusting for covariates. Opioid use prior to orthopaedic surgery is common and appears to vary by geographical location.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"331-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10196173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231173001
Jellsingh Jeyadoss, Damian Jg Johnson, David J Brownlie, Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan
Sugammadex-induced bradycardia is well known and the incidence is quoted to be around 0.6–1%. 1,2 While the mechanism is unknown, sugammadex-induced bradycardia can be resistant to the administration of anti-cholinergics 3 and may degenerate to pulseless electrical activity 4 or asystole, 5 warranting management with vasopressors and inotropes alongside standard cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures. We report a patient who developed asystole immediately after administration of 200 mg (2.7 mg/kg) of sugammadex, which then evolved into complete heart block (CHB) requiring temporary transvenous pacing over 24 h. An 84-year-old male weighing 73 kg with features of acute acalculous cholecystitis was scheduled for an emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Significant past medical history included hypertension, hypercho-lesterolaemia, ischaemic heart disease with moderate systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 37%), stable angina and chronic kidney disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 ml/min/1.72 m 2 . He was independent with his activities of daily living; however, he described New York Heart Association Class 2 dyspnoea. His medications included isosorbide mononitrate, candesartan, aspirin, atorvastatin and pantoprazole. His baseline troponin level during this admission was elevated to 66 ng/l, a change from 43 ng/l (reference range (cid:1) 16 ng/l) measured three weeks prior, and this was attributed to his gallbladder inflammation and renal dysfunction. A preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a heart rate (HR) of 66/min and left bundle branch block.
{"title":"Complete heart block of multifactorial aetiology following sugammadex administration.","authors":"Jellsingh Jeyadoss, Damian Jg Johnson, David J Brownlie, Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231173001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231173001","url":null,"abstract":"Sugammadex-induced bradycardia is well known and the incidence is quoted to be around 0.6–1%. 1,2 While the mechanism is unknown, sugammadex-induced bradycardia can be resistant to the administration of anti-cholinergics 3 and may degenerate to pulseless electrical activity 4 or asystole, 5 warranting management with vasopressors and inotropes alongside standard cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures. We report a patient who developed asystole immediately after administration of 200 mg (2.7 mg/kg) of sugammadex, which then evolved into complete heart block (CHB) requiring temporary transvenous pacing over 24 h. An 84-year-old male weighing 73 kg with features of acute acalculous cholecystitis was scheduled for an emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Significant past medical history included hypertension, hypercho-lesterolaemia, ischaemic heart disease with moderate systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 37%), stable angina and chronic kidney disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 ml/min/1.72 m 2 . He was independent with his activities of daily living; however, he described New York Heart Association Class 2 dyspnoea. His medications included isosorbide mononitrate, candesartan, aspirin, atorvastatin and pantoprazole. His baseline troponin level during this admission was elevated to 66 ng/l, a change from 43 ng/l (reference range (cid:1) 16 ng/l) measured three weeks prior, and this was attributed to his gallbladder inflammation and renal dysfunction. A preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a heart rate (HR) of 66/min and left bundle branch block.","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"359-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10261982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231163890
Ian Sh Fong, Chin Hang Yiu, Matthew D Abelev, Sara Allaf, David A Begley, Bernadette A Bugeja, Kok Eng Khor, Joanne Rimington, Jonathan Penm
Opioids are commonly prescribed to manage pain after surgery. However, excessive supply on discharge can increase patients' risk of persistent opioid use and contribute to the reservoir of unused opioids in the community that may be misused. This study aimed to evaluate the use of opioids in Australian surgical patients after discharge and patient satisfaction with the provision of opioid information after discharge. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral and teaching hospital. Surgical patients were called 7-28 days after discharge to identify their opioid use and the information that they received after discharge. In total, 66 patients responded. Most patients underwent orthopaedic surgery (45.5%; 30/66). The median days of opioids supplied on discharge was 5 (IQR 3-5). In total, 40.9% (27/66) of patients had >50% of their opioids remaining. Patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were less likely to have >50% of their opioids remaining (P = 0.045), whilst patients undergoing urological or renal surgeries were significantly more likely (P = 0.009). Most patients recalled receiving information about their opioids (89.4%; 59/66). However, the majority (51.5%; 34/66) did not recall receiving any information about the signs of opioid toxicity and interactions between opioids and alcohol. In conclusion, around 40% of patients had more than half of their opioid supply remaining after they ceased taking their opioid. Although most patients recalled receiving information about their opioids, more than half did not recall receiving any information about the signs of opioid toxicity or interactions between opioids and alcohol.
{"title":"Supply of opioids and information provided to patients after surgery in an Australian hospital: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ian Sh Fong, Chin Hang Yiu, Matthew D Abelev, Sara Allaf, David A Begley, Bernadette A Bugeja, Kok Eng Khor, Joanne Rimington, Jonathan Penm","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231163890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231163890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioids are commonly prescribed to manage pain after surgery. However, excessive supply on discharge can increase patients' risk of persistent opioid use and contribute to the reservoir of unused opioids in the community that may be misused. This study aimed to evaluate the use of opioids in Australian surgical patients after discharge and patient satisfaction with the provision of opioid information after discharge. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral and teaching hospital. Surgical patients were called 7-28 days after discharge to identify their opioid use and the information that they received after discharge. In total, 66 patients responded. Most patients underwent orthopaedic surgery (45.5%; 30/66). The median days of opioids supplied on discharge was 5 (IQR 3-5). In total, 40.9% (27/66) of patients had >50% of their opioids remaining. Patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were less likely to have >50% of their opioids remaining (<i>P</i> = 0.045), whilst patients undergoing urological or renal surgeries were significantly more likely (<i>P</i> = 0.009). Most patients recalled receiving information about their opioids (89.4%; 59/66). However, the majority (51.5%; 34/66) did not recall receiving any information about the signs of opioid toxicity and interactions between opioids and alcohol. In conclusion, around 40% of patients had more than half of their opioid supply remaining after they ceased taking their opioid. Although most patients recalled receiving information about their opioids, more than half did not recall receiving any information about the signs of opioid toxicity or interactions between opioids and alcohol.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"340-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493037/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10214368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231172790
Shania Liu, Jennifer A Stevens, Ashleigh E Collins, Jed Duff, Joanna R Sutherland, Morgan D Oddie, Justine M Naylor, Asad E Patanwala, Benita M Suckling, Jonathan Penm
Opioid analgesics prescribed for the management of acute pain following orthopaedic surgery may lead to unintended long-term opioid use and associated patient harms. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of opioid use at 90 days after elective orthopaedic surgery across major city, regional and rural locations in New South Wales, Australia. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery at five hospitals from major city, regional, rural, public and private settings between April 2017 and February 2020. Data were collected by patient questionnaire at the pre-admission clinic 2-6 weeks before surgery and by telephone call after 90 days following surgery. Of the 361 participants recruited, 54% (195/361) were women and the mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation 10.1 years). Opioid use at 90 or more days after orthopaedic surgery was reported by 15.8% (57/361; 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-20%) of all participants and ranged from 3.5% (2/57) at a major city location to 37.8% (14/37) at an inner regional location. Predictors of long-term postoperative opioid use in the multivariable analysis were surgery performed at an inner regional location (adjusted odds ratio 12.26; 95% CI 2.2-68.24) and outer regional location (adjusted odds ratio 5.46; 95% CI 1.09-27.50) after adjusting for known covariates. Long-term opioid use was reported in over 15% of patients following orthopaedic surgery and appears to be more prevalent in regional locations in Australia.
阿片类镇痛药用于骨科手术后急性疼痛的治疗可能导致意外的长期阿片类药物使用和相关的患者伤害。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚新南威尔士州主要城市、地区和农村地区择期骨科手术后90天阿片类药物使用的流行情况。我们对2017年4月至2020年2月期间在主要城市、地区、农村、公立和私立五家医院接受择期骨科手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性、观察性队列研究。采用术前2-6周入院前门诊问卷调查和术后90天电话访谈的方式收集资料。在招募的361名参与者中,54%(195/361)是女性,平均年龄为67.7岁(标准差为10.1岁)。在骨科手术后90天或更长时间使用阿片类药物的比例为15.8% (57/361;95%置信区间(CI)为12.2-20%,范围从主要城市位置的3.5%(2/57)到内部区域位置的37.8%(14/37)。在多变量分析中,术后长期阿片类药物使用的预测因素是在内区域位置进行手术(校正优势比12.26;95% CI 2.2-68.24)和外部区域位置(校正优势比5.46;95% CI 1.09-27.50),校正已知协变量后。据报道,超过15%的骨科手术后患者长期使用阿片类药物,在澳大利亚的区域地区似乎更为普遍。
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of long-term opioid use following orthopaedic surgery in an Australian setting: A multicentre, prospective cohort study.","authors":"Shania Liu, Jennifer A Stevens, Ashleigh E Collins, Jed Duff, Joanna R Sutherland, Morgan D Oddie, Justine M Naylor, Asad E Patanwala, Benita M Suckling, Jonathan Penm","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231172790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231172790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid analgesics prescribed for the management of acute pain following orthopaedic surgery may lead to unintended long-term opioid use and associated patient harms. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of opioid use at 90 days after elective orthopaedic surgery across major city, regional and rural locations in New South Wales, Australia. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery at five hospitals from major city, regional, rural, public and private settings between April 2017 and February 2020. Data were collected by patient questionnaire at the pre-admission clinic 2-6 weeks before surgery and by telephone call after 90 days following surgery. Of the 361 participants recruited, 54% (195/361) were women and the mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation 10.1 years). Opioid use at 90 or more days after orthopaedic surgery was reported by 15.8% (57/361; 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-20%) of all participants and ranged from 3.5% (2/57) at a major city location to 37.8% (14/37) at an inner regional location. Predictors of long-term postoperative opioid use in the multivariable analysis were surgery performed at an inner regional location (adjusted odds ratio 12.26; 95% CI 2.2-68.24) and outer regional location (adjusted odds ratio 5.46; 95% CI 1.09-27.50) after adjusting for known covariates. Long-term opioid use was reported in over 15% of patients following orthopaedic surgery and appears to be more prevalent in regional locations in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"321-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/0e/10.1177_0310057X231172790.PMC10493038.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10214371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01Epub Date: 2023-08-11DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231179917
Christine M Ball, Peter J Featherstone
{"title":"The commercialisation of insulin.","authors":"Christine M Ball, Peter J Featherstone","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231179917","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0310057X231179917","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"312-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958490/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10199709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1177/0310057X231172999
David Jones
{"title":"Location, location, location: The variable geography of opioid use and misuse.","authors":"David Jones","doi":"10.1177/0310057X231172999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231172999","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 5","pages":"316-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10207633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}