American Journal of Neuroradiology最新文献

Background and purpose: Due to its high sensitivity, somatostatin receptor-PET may detect smaller lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging, while the superior spatial resolution of MR imaging enables lesions to be accurately localized. We compared results of somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI with those of MR imaging alone and assessed the added value of vertex-to-thigh imaging for head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

Materials and methods: Somatostatin receptor-PET/CT was acquired as limited brain or head and neck imaging, with optional vertex-to-thigh imaging, following administration of ⁶⁴CU/⁶⁸GA DOTATATE. Somatostatin receptor-PET was fused with separately acquired contrast-enhanced MR imaging. DOTATATE activity was classified as comparable, more extensive, and/or showing additional lesions compared with MR imaging. Vertex-to-thigh findings were classified as positive or negative for metastatic disease or incidental.

Results: Thirty patients (with 13 meningiomas, 11 paragangliomas, 1 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma, 1 middle ear neuroendocrine adenoma, 1 external auditory canal mass, 1 pituitary carcinoma, 1 olfactory neuroblastoma, 1 orbital mass) were imaged. Five had no evidence of somatostatin receptor-positive lesions and were excluded. In 11/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI and MR imaging were comparable. In 7/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI showed more extensive disease, while in 9/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI identified additional lesions. On vertex-to-thigh imaging, 1 of 17 patients was positive for metastatic disease, 8 of 17 were negative, and 8 of 17 demonstrated incidental findings.

Conclusions: Somatostatin receptor-PET detected additional lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone, while vertex-to-thigh imaging showed a low incidence of metastatic disease. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI enabled superior anatomic delineation of tumor burden, while any discrepancies were readily addressed. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI has the potential to play an important role in presurgical and radiation therapy planning of head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

Background: Transophthalmic artery embolization of intracranial meningiomas is thought to be associated with a high complication risk.

Purpose: With advances in endovascular techniques, we systematically reviewed the current literature to improve our understanding of the safety and efficacy of transophthalmic artery embolization of intracranial meningiomas.

Data sources: We performed a systematic search using PubMed from inception until August 3, 2022.

Study selection: Twelve studies with 28 patients with intracranial meningiomas embolized through the transophthalmic artery were included.

Data analysis: Baseline and technical characteristics and clinical and safety outcomes were collected. No statistical analysis was conducted.

Data synthesis: The average age of 27 patients was 49.5 (SD, 13) years. Eighteen (69%) meningiomas were located in the anterior cranial fossa, and 8 (31%), in the sphenoid ridge/wing. Polyvinyl alcohol particles were most commonly (n = 8, 31%) used to preoperatively embolize meningiomas, followed by n-BCA in 6 (23%), Onyx in 6 (23%), Gelfoam in 5 (19%), and coils in 1 patient (4%). Complete embolization of the target meningioma feeders was reported in 8 (47%) of 17 patients; partial embolization, in 6 (32%); and suboptimal embolization, in 3 (18%). The endovascular complication rate was 16% (4 of 25), which included visual impairment in 3 (12%) patients.

Limitations: Selection and publication biases were limitations.

Conclusions: Transophthalmic artery embolization of intracranial meningiomas is feasible but is associated with a non-negligible complication rate.

MR imaging is well-established as the criterion standard for carotid artery atherosclerosis imaging. The capability of MR imaging to differentiate numerous plaque components has been demonstrated, including those features that are associated with a high risk of sudden changes, thrombosis, or embolization. The field of carotid plaque MR imaging is constantly evolving, with continued insight into the imaging appearance and implications of various vulnerable plaque characteristics. This article will review the most up-to-date knowledge of these high-risk plaque features on MR imaging and will delve into 2 major emerging topics: the role of vulnerable plaques in cryptogenic strokes and the potential use of MR imaging to modify carotid endarterectomy treatment guidelines.

Background and purpose: Venous-predominant AVMs are almost identical in appearance to developmental venous anomalies on conventional MR imaging. Herein, we compared and analyzed arterial spin-labeling findings in patients with developmental venous anomalies or venous-predominant AVMs, using DSA as the criterion standard.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected patients with either DVAs or venous-predominant AVMs, each available on both DSA and arterial spin-labeling images. Arterial spin-labeling imaging was visually assessed for the presence of hyperintense signal. CBF measured at the most representative section was normalized to the contralateral gray matter. The temporal phase of developmental venous anomalies or venous-predominant AVMs was measured on DSA as a delay between the first appearance of the intracranial artery and the lesion. Correlation between the normalized CBF and the temporal phase was evaluated.

Results: Analysis of 15 lesions (13 patients) resulted in categorization into 3 groups: typical venous-predominant AVMs (temporal phase, <2 seconds), intermediate group (temporal phase between 2.5 and 5 seconds), and classic developmental venous anomalies (temporal phase, >10 seconds). Arterial spin-labeling signal was markedly increased in the typical venous-predominant AVM group, while there was no discernible signal in the classic developmental venous anomaly group. In the intermediate group, however, 3 of 6 lesions showed mildly increased arterial spin-labeling signal. The normalized CBF on arterial spin-labeling and the temporal phase on DSA were moderately negatively correlated: r(13) = 0.66, P = .008.

Conclusions: Arterial spin-labeling may predict the presence and amount of arteriovenous shunting in venous-predominant AVMs, and using arterial spin-labeling enables confirmation of typical venous-predominant AVMs without DSA. However, lesions with an intermediate amount of shunting suggest a spectrum of vascular malformations ranging from purely vein-draining developmental venous anomalies to venous-predominant AVMs with overt arteriovenous shunting.

Background: Perfusion imaging with multidetector CT is integral to the evaluation of patients presenting with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. Using conebeam CT perfusion in a direct-to-angio approach could reduce workflow times and improve functional outcome.

Purpose: Our aim was to provide an overview of conebeam CT techniques for quantifying cerebral perfusion, their clinical applications, and validation.

Data sources: A systematic search was performed for articles published between January 2000 and October 2022 in which a conebeam CT imaging technique for quantifying cerebral perfusion in human subjects was compared against a reference technique.

Study selection: Eleven articles were retrieved describing 2 techniques: dual-phase (n = 6) and multiphase (n = 5) conebeam CTP.

Data analysis: Descriptions of the conebeam CT techniques and the correlations between them and the reference techniques were retrieved.

Data synthesis: Appraisal of the quality and risk of bias of the included studies revealed little concern about bias and applicability. Good correlations were reported for dual-phase conebeam CTP; however, the comprehensiveness of its parameter is unclear. Multiphase conebeam CTP demonstrated the potential for clinical implementation due to its ability to produce conventional stroke protocols. However, it did not consistently correlate with the reference techniques.

Limitations: The heterogeneity within the available literature made it impossible to apply meta-analysis to the data.

Conclusions: The reviewed techniques show promise for clinical use. Beyond evaluating their diagnostic accuracy, future studies should address the practical challenges associated with implementing these techniques and the potential benefits for different ischemic diseases.

Background and purpose: We performed this study to identify the effect of the nationwide iodinated contrast media shortage due to reduction in GE Healthcare production, initiated on April 19, 2022, on the evaluation of patients with stroke.

Materials and methods: We analyzed the data on 72,514 patients who underwent imaging processed with commercial software in a sample of 399 hospitals in United States from February 28, 2022, through July 10, 2022. We quantified the percentage change in the daily number of CTAs and CTPs performed before and after April 19, 2022.

Results: The daily counts of individual patients who underwent CTAs decreased (a 9.6% reduction, P = .002) from 1.584 studies per day per hospital to 1.433 studies per day per hospital. The daily counts of individual patients who underwent CTPs decreased (a 25.9% reduction, P = .003) from 0.484 studies per day per hospital to 0.358 studies per day per hospital. A significant reduction in CTPs using GE Healthcare contrast media (43.06%, P < .001) was seen but not in CTPs using non-GE Healthcare contrast media (increase by 2.93%, P = .29). The daily counts of individual patients with large-vessel occlusion decreased (a 7.69% reduction) from 0.124 per day per hospital to 0.114 per day per hospital.

Conclusions: Our analysis reported changes in the use of CTA and CTP in patients with acute ischemic stroke during the contrast media shortage. Further research needs to identify effective strategies to reduce the reliance on contrast media-based studies such as CTA and CTP without compromising patient outcomes.

Background and purpose: Deep learning image reconstruction allows faster MR imaging acquisitions while matching or exceeding the standard of care and can create synthetic images from existing data sets. This multicenter, multireader spine study evaluated the performance of synthetically created STIR compared with acquired STIR.

Materials and methods: From a multicenter, multiscanner data base of 328 clinical cases, a nonreader neuroradiologist randomly selected 110 spine MR imaging studies in 93 patients (sagittal T1, T2, and STIR) and classified them into 5 categories of disease and healthy. A DICOM-based deep learning application generated a synthetically created STIR series from the sagittal T1 and T2 images. Five radiologists (3 neuroradiologists, 1 musculoskeletal radiologist, and 1 general radiologist) rated the STIR quality and classified disease pathology (study 1, n = 80). They then assessed the presence or absence of findings typically evaluated with STIR in patients with trauma (study 2, n = 30). The readers evaluated studies with either acquired STIR or synthetically created STIR in a blinded and randomized fashion with a 1-month washout period. The interchangeability of acquired STIR and synthetically created STIR was assessed using a noninferiority threshold of 10%.

Results: For classification, there was a decrease in interreader agreement expected by randomly introducing synthetically created STIR of 3.23%. For trauma, there was an overall increase in interreader agreement by +1.9%. The lower bound of confidence for both exceeded the noninferiority threshold, indicating interchangeability of synthetically created STIR with acquired STIR. Both the Wilcoxon signed-rank and t tests showed higher image-quality scores for synthetically created STIR over acquired STIR (P < .0001).

Conclusions: Synthetically created STIR spine MR images were diagnostically interchangeable with acquired STIR, while providing significantly higher image quality, suggesting routine clinical practice potential.