首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Pharmacotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Risk of Fractures With Concomitant Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. 同时使用钙通道阻滞剂和选择性羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的骨折风险。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231218286
Raj Desai, Steven M Smith, Rajesh Mohandas, Joshua Brown, Haesuk Park

Background: Despite their frequent concurrent use, little is known about the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on fracture risk. We compared risk of fractures in patients concomitantly treated with CCBs and SSRIs versus CCB-only users. We compared risk of fractures among concomitant CCB-SSRI users initiating cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)-inhibiting SSRIs versus non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare Supplemental database (2007-2019). We included adults diagnosed with hypertension and depression, newly initiating SSRIs while being treated with CCBs (ie, concomitant CCB-SSRI users) and those who did not (ie, CCB-only users). Primary outcome was the first occurrence of any fracture. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) based on propensity scores to balance baseline risk between groups. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to compare fracture risk.

Results: We identified 191 352 concomitant CCB-SSRI and 956 760 CCB-only users (mean age = 56 years, 50.1% males). After sIPTW, compared with CCB-only users, CCBs-SSRIs users had a higher risk of fractures (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.66). No difference in the risk of fractures between concomitant users of CCB-CYP3A4-inhibiting SSRIs and those of CCB-non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.87-1.40) was observed.

Conclusion and relevance: Short-term concomitant CCB-SSRI use was associated with increased fracture risk. Concomitant CCBs and CYP3A4-inhibiting SSRIs compared with CCBs and non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs use was not associated with increased risk.

背景:尽管钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)经常同时使用,但人们对它们同时使用对骨折风险的影响知之甚少。我们比较了同时接受 CCB 和 SSRIs 治疗的患者与仅接受 CCB 治疗的患者的骨折风险。我们比较了同时服用细胞色素 P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) 抑制性 SSRI 与非 CYP3A4 抑制性 SSRI 的 CCB-SSRI 患者的骨折风险:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 IBM MarketScan 商业索赔和医疗保险补充数据库(2007-2019 年)。我们纳入了被诊断患有高血压和抑郁症、在接受氯苯类药物治疗时新开始服用 SSRIs 的成人(即同时服用氯苯类药物和 SSRIs 的患者)和未服用 SSRIs 的成人(即仅服用氯苯类药物的患者)。主要结果是首次发生任何骨折。我们使用基于倾向评分的稳定逆治疗概率加权(sIPTW)来平衡各组间的基线风险。采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型比较骨折风险:我们发现了191352名同时服用CCB-SSRI的患者和956760名仅服用CCB的患者(平均年龄=56岁,50.1%为男性)。sIPTW后,与纯CCB使用者相比,CCBs-SSRIs使用者的骨折风险更高(危险比[HR]:1.43,95%置信区间[CI]:1.22-1.66)。同时服用CCB-CYP3A4抑制性SSRIs和服用CCB-非CYP3A4抑制性SSRIs的患者发生骨折的风险没有差异(HR:1.10,95% CI:0.87-1.40):短期同时服用CCB-SSRI与骨折风险增加有关。与同时服用CCBs和非CYP3A4抑制性SSRIs相比,同时服用CCBs和CYP3A4抑制性SSRIs与风险增加无关。
{"title":"Risk of Fractures With Concomitant Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.","authors":"Raj Desai, Steven M Smith, Rajesh Mohandas, Joshua Brown, Haesuk Park","doi":"10.1177/10600280231218286","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231218286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their frequent concurrent use, little is known about the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on fracture risk. We compared risk of fractures in patients concomitantly treated with CCBs and SSRIs versus CCB-only users. We compared risk of fractures among concomitant CCB-SSRI users initiating cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)-inhibiting SSRIs versus non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare Supplemental database (2007-2019). We included adults diagnosed with hypertension and depression, newly initiating SSRIs while being treated with CCBs (ie, concomitant CCB-SSRI users) and those who did not (ie, CCB-only users). Primary outcome was the first occurrence of any fracture. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) based on propensity scores to balance baseline risk between groups. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to compare fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 191 352 concomitant CCB-SSRI and 956 760 CCB-only users (mean age = 56 years, 50.1% males). After sIPTW, compared with CCB-only users, CCBs-SSRIs users had a higher risk of fractures (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.66). No difference in the risk of fractures between concomitant users of CCB-CYP3A4-inhibiting SSRIs and those of CCB-non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.87-1.40) was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Short-term concomitant CCB-SSRI use was associated with increased fracture risk. Concomitant CCBs and CYP3A4-inhibiting SSRIs compared with CCBs and non-CYP3A4 inhibiting SSRIs use was not associated with increased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138795657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phenobarbital Versus Benzodiazepines for the Treatment of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal. 苯巴比妥与苯并二氮杂卓在治疗严重酒精戒断方面的对比。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-21 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231221241
Katherine M Kessel, Logan M Olson, Derek A Kruse, Elizabeth R Lyden, Kelsey E Whiston, Mindy M Blodgett, Alena A Balasanova

Background: Phenobarbital may offer advantages over benzodiazepines for severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS), but its impact on clinical outcomes has not been fully elucidated.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of phenobarbital versus benzodiazepines for SAWS.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared phenobarbital to benzodiazepines for the management of SAWS for patients admitted to progressive or intensive care units (ICUs) between July 2018 and July 2022. Patients included had a history of delirium tremens (DT) or seizures, Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) >15, or Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) score ≥4. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included progressive or ICU LOS, incidence of adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and incidence/duration of mechanical ventilation.

Results: The final analysis included 126 phenobarbital and 98 benzodiazepine encounters. Patients treated with phenobarbital had shorter median hospital LOS versus those treated with benzodiazepines (2.8 vs 4.7 days; P < 0.0001); a finding corroborated by multivariable analysis. The phenobarbital group also had shorter median progressive/ICU LOS (0.7 vs 1.3 days; P < 0.0001), and lower incidence of dexmedetomidine (P < 0.0001) and antipsychotic initiation (P < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the phenobarbital group compared to the benzodiazepine group received new mechanical ventilation (P = 0.045), but median duration was similar (1.2 vs 1.6 days; P = 1.00).

Conclusion and relevance: Scheduled phenobarbital was associated with decreased hospital LOS compared to benzodiazepines for SAWS. This was the first study to compare outcomes of fixed-dose, nonoverlapping phenobarbital to benzodiazepines in patients with clearly defined SAWS and details a readily implementable protocol.

背景:苯巴比妥在治疗严重酒精戒断综合征(SAWS)方面可能比苯二氮卓类药物更具优势,但其对临床结果的影响尚未完全阐明:在治疗严重酒精戒断综合征(SAWS)时,苯巴比妥可能比苯二氮卓类药物更具优势,但其对临床结果的影响尚未完全阐明:本研究旨在确定苯巴比妥与苯二氮卓类药物对严重酒精戒断综合征的临床影响:这项回顾性队列研究比较了苯巴比妥和苯二氮卓类药物对2018年7月至2022年7月期间入住进展期或重症监护病房(ICU)的SAWS患者的治疗效果。纳入的患者均有震颤性谵妄(DT)或癫痫发作病史,临床研究所酒精戒断评估修订版(CIWA-Ar)>15,或酒精戒断严重程度预测量表(PAWSS)评分≥4。主要结果是住院时间(LOS)。次要结果包括进展期或 ICU LOS、辅助药物治疗的发生率以及机械通气的发生率/持续时间:最终分析包括 126 次苯巴比妥治疗和 98 次苯二氮卓治疗。苯巴比妥类药物治疗患者的中位住院时间比苯二氮卓类药物治疗患者的中位住院时间短(2.8 天 vs 4.7 天;P < 0.0001);多变量分析证实了这一结果。苯巴比妥组的进展期/重症监护室中位住院日也更短(0.7 天 vs 1.3 天;P < 0.0001),右美托咪定(P < 0.0001)和抗精神病药物的使用率也更低(P < 0.0001)。苯巴比妥组接受新机械通气的患者少于苯二氮卓组(P = 0.045),但中位持续时间相似(1.2 vs 1.6 天;P = 1.00):与苯二氮卓类药物相比,苯巴比妥类药物可缩短SAWS的住院时间。这是第一项比较固定剂量、不重叠的苯巴比妥与苯二氮卓类药物对明确定义的 SAWS 患者治疗效果的研究,并详细介绍了一种易于实施的方案。
{"title":"Phenobarbital Versus Benzodiazepines for the Treatment of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal.","authors":"Katherine M Kessel, Logan M Olson, Derek A Kruse, Elizabeth R Lyden, Kelsey E Whiston, Mindy M Blodgett, Alena A Balasanova","doi":"10.1177/10600280231221241","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231221241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenobarbital may offer advantages over benzodiazepines for severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS), but its impact on clinical outcomes has not been fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of phenobarbital versus benzodiazepines for SAWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared phenobarbital to benzodiazepines for the management of SAWS for patients admitted to progressive or intensive care units (ICUs) between July 2018 and July 2022. Patients included had a history of delirium tremens (DT) or seizures, Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) >15, or Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) score ≥4. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included progressive or ICU LOS, incidence of adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and incidence/duration of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 126 phenobarbital and 98 benzodiazepine encounters. Patients treated with phenobarbital had shorter median hospital LOS versus those treated with benzodiazepines (2.8 vs 4.7 days; <i>P</i> < 0.0001); a finding corroborated by multivariable analysis. The phenobarbital group also had shorter median progressive/ICU LOS (0.7 vs 1.3 days; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and lower incidence of dexmedetomidine (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and antipsychotic initiation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the phenobarbital group compared to the benzodiazepine group received new mechanical ventilation (<i>P</i> = 0.045), but median duration was similar (1.2 vs 1.6 days; <i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Scheduled phenobarbital was associated with decreased hospital LOS compared to benzodiazepines for SAWS. This was the first study to compare outcomes of fixed-dose, nonoverlapping phenobarbital to benzodiazepines in patients with clearly defined SAWS and details a readily implementable protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139511499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Incidence of Torsades de Pointes With Perioperative Triple Antiemetic Administration. 围术期服用三联止吐药导致的 Torsades de Pointes 发生率
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231215786
Gregory A Nuttall, Alyssa M Reed, Khue D Pham Louis, Lance J Oyen, Samuel P Marsland, Michael J Ackerman

Background: The safety of triple antiemetic therapy consisting of ondansetron, haloperidol, and a steroid, to surgical patients is unknown.

Objective: To determine the incidence of torsade de pointes (TdP) or death following perioperative administration of triple antiemetic therapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study identified 19,874 patients who received 22,202 doses of triple antiemetics during the 2.5-year time frame from March 4, 2020 to September 7, 2022 for surgical nausea prophylaxis or treatment of nausea. These patients above were cross-matched with an electrocardiogram and adverse outcome database; this identified 226 patients with documentation of a QTc > 450 ms, all ventricular tachycardias including TdP within 48 hours of receiving triple antiemetic therapy, or death within 7 days of receiving ondansetron.

Results: There were 3 patients who had documented VT (n = 3), but there were no documented incidents of TdP (n = 0). There were 9 codes called on patients within 48 hours of medication administration, and none of them were due to ventricular arrythmias (n = 0). A total of 11 patients died within 7 days of triple antiemetic therapy. Ten of the 11 deaths were determined to not be from the triple antiemetic. One patient died at home within 24 hours of the procedure of an unknown cause (n = 1).

Conclusions and relevance: No episodes of TdP were identified in patients receiving triple antiemetic therapy perioperatively, though the cause of death in 1 patient could not be determined. This suggest that low-dose triple antiemetic therapy is low risk for the development of TdP.

背景:手术患者接受由昂丹司琼、氟哌啶醇和类固醇组成的三联止吐疗法的安全性尚不清楚:目的:确定围手术期使用三联止吐疗法后发生心搏骤停(TdP)或死亡的几率:一项回顾性队列研究发现,在 2020 年 3 月 4 日至 2022 年 9 月 7 日的 2.5 年时间内,有 19,874 名患者因手术恶心预防或治疗而接受了 22,202 剂三联止吐药。将上述患者与心电图和不良反应数据库进行交叉比对;结果发现,有 226 名患者在接受三联止吐药治疗后 48 小时内出现 QTc > 450 毫秒、包括 TdP 在内的所有室性心动过速,或在接受昂丹司琼治疗后 7 天内死亡:有记录的室性心动过速患者有 3 名(n = 3),但没有记录的 TdP 事件(n = 0)。在用药后 48 小时内,有 9 名患者被叫到代码,但无一例是由于室性心律失常(n = 0)。共有 11 名患者在接受三联止吐疗法 7 天内死亡。在这11例死亡病例中,有10例被确定并非死于三联止吐药。一名患者在手术后24小时内死于家中,死因不明(1例):在围手术期接受三联止吐疗法的患者中未发现TdP发作,但有一名患者的死因无法确定。这表明小剂量三联止吐疗法发生TdP的风险较低。
{"title":"The Incidence of Torsades de Pointes With Perioperative Triple Antiemetic Administration.","authors":"Gregory A Nuttall, Alyssa M Reed, Khue D Pham Louis, Lance J Oyen, Samuel P Marsland, Michael J Ackerman","doi":"10.1177/10600280231215786","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231215786","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety of triple antiemetic therapy consisting of ondansetron, haloperidol, and a steroid, to surgical patients is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of torsade de pointes (TdP) or death following perioperative administration of triple antiemetic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study identified 19,874 patients who received 22,202 doses of triple antiemetics during the 2.5-year time frame from March 4, 2020 to September 7, 2022 for surgical nausea prophylaxis or treatment of nausea. These patients above were cross-matched with an electrocardiogram and adverse outcome database; this identified 226 patients with documentation of a QTc > 450 ms, all ventricular tachycardias including TdP within 48 hours of receiving triple antiemetic therapy, or death within 7 days of receiving ondansetron.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3 patients who had documented VT (n = 3), but there were no documented incidents of TdP (n = 0). There were 9 codes called on patients within 48 hours of medication administration, and none of them were due to ventricular arrythmias (n = 0). A total of 11 patients died within 7 days of triple antiemetic therapy. Ten of the 11 deaths were determined to not be from the triple antiemetic. One patient died at home within 24 hours of the procedure of an unknown cause (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>No episodes of TdP were identified in patients receiving triple antiemetic therapy perioperatively, though the cause of death in 1 patient could not be determined. This suggest that low-dose triple antiemetic therapy is low risk for the development of TdP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138486505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of Atypical Antipsychotics-Induced Adverse Events Related to Diabetes Mellitus in Patients With Dementia Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database. 利用日本药物不良事件报告数据库分析非典型抗精神病药引发的痴呆症患者糖尿病相关不良事件
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-24 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231213507
Fuga Habuchi, Natsuko Ishida, Ryo Matsushita, Junko Ishizaki, Yukio Suga

Background: Patients with dementia are prescribed low-dose atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) to treat psycho-behavioral symptoms. Although AAPs are known to cause diabetes mellitus-related adverse events (DMAEs), information regarding AAPs-induced DMAEs experienced by patients with dementia is lacking.

Objective: To use the Japan Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database to assess the onset tendencies and patterns of DMAEs attributable to AAPs prescribed to patients with dementia.

Methods: We performed an analysis using dementia cases from the JADER database that were registered from April 2004 to December 2022. Data in the JADER database are completely anonymized; thus, we did not require institutional review board approval for using the JADER database in our study. The reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were used to assess the onset tendencies of DMAEs with AAPs. In addition, Weibull shape parameters were used to assess the patterns of DMAEs that occur with the use of AAPs.

Results: We identified AAPs associated with DMAEs. In particular, low doses of quetiapine showed the potential to induce DMAEs. An analysis of the onset of DMAEs showed the early failure patterns for AAPs (median onset = 38 days).

Conclusion and relevance: The AAPs may cause DMAEs in patients with dementia. Low doses of quetiapine may induce DMAEs. Health care workers should focus on the development of DMAEs during the early administration period of AAPs. These results may assist with the safe management of patients with dementia who use AAPs.

背景:痴呆症患者服用低剂量非典型抗精神病药物(AAPs)来治疗精神行为症状。尽管已知 AAPs 可导致糖尿病相关不良事件(DMAEs),但有关痴呆症患者因 AAPs 引起的 DMAEs 的信息却很缺乏:目的:利用日本药物不良事件报告(JADER)数据库评估痴呆症患者服用 AAPs 引起 DMAE 的发病趋势和模式:我们使用 JADER 数据库中 2004 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间登记的痴呆病例进行了分析。JADER 数据库中的数据是完全匿名的;因此,我们在研究中使用 JADER 数据库无需获得机构审查委员会的批准。我们使用报告几率比和报告比例比(PRR)来评估 DMAE 与 AAPs 的发病趋势。此外,我们还使用 Weibull 形状参数来评估使用 AAPs 时 DMAEs 的发生模式:结果:我们发现了与 DMAE 相关的 AAPs。结果:我们发现了与DMAEs相关的AAPs,尤其是低剂量的喹硫平有可能诱发DMAEs。对 DMAEs 发病时间的分析表明了 AAPs 的早期失效模式(发病时间中位数 = 38 天):AAPs可能会导致痴呆症患者出现DMAEs。低剂量的喹硫平可能会诱发 DMAEs。医护人员应重点关注在早期服用 AAPs 期间 DMAEs 的发展情况。这些结果可能有助于对使用 AAPs 的痴呆症患者进行安全管理。
{"title":"Analysis of Atypical Antipsychotics-Induced Adverse Events Related to Diabetes Mellitus in Patients With Dementia Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.","authors":"Fuga Habuchi, Natsuko Ishida, Ryo Matsushita, Junko Ishizaki, Yukio Suga","doi":"10.1177/10600280231213507","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231213507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dementia are prescribed low-dose atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) to treat psycho-behavioral symptoms. Although AAPs are known to cause diabetes mellitus-related adverse events (DMAEs), information regarding AAPs-induced DMAEs experienced by patients with dementia is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use the Japan Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database to assess the onset tendencies and patterns of DMAEs attributable to AAPs prescribed to patients with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an analysis using dementia cases from the JADER database that were registered from April 2004 to December 2022. Data in the JADER database are completely anonymized; thus, we did not require institutional review board approval for using the JADER database in our study. The reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were used to assess the onset tendencies of DMAEs with AAPs. In addition, Weibull shape parameters were used to assess the patterns of DMAEs that occur with the use of AAPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified AAPs associated with DMAEs. In particular, low doses of quetiapine showed the potential to induce DMAEs. An analysis of the onset of DMAEs showed the early failure patterns for AAPs (median onset = 38 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The AAPs may cause DMAEs in patients with dementia. Low doses of quetiapine may induce DMAEs. Health care workers should focus on the development of DMAEs during the early administration period of AAPs. These results may assist with the safe management of patients with dementia who use AAPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138827776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment: Pirtobrutinib: A New and Distinctive Treatment Option for B-Cell Malignancies. 评论:Pirtobrutinib:治疗 B 细胞恶性肿瘤的独特新疗法。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1177/10600280241258777
Kayla Lawlor
{"title":"Comment: Pirtobrutinib: A New and Distinctive Treatment Option for B-Cell Malignancies.","authors":"Kayla Lawlor","doi":"10.1177/10600280241258777","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280241258777","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Clinical, Economic, and Health Resource Utilization Impacts of Prefilled Syringes Versus Conventional Medication Administration Methods: Results From a Systematic Literature Review. 评估预充式注射器与传统给药方法的临床、经济和卫生资源利用影响:来自系统文献综述的结果。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231212890
Dan Benhamou, Mia Weiss, Matthias Borms, Julia Lucaci, Haymen Girgis, Cecile Frolet, Wesley T Baisley, Gio Shoushi, Kristen A Cribbs, Manuel Wenk

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the clinical, economic, and health resource utilization outcomes associated with the use of prefilled syringes in medication administration compared with traditional preparation methods.

Data sources: We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate outcomes such as medication errors, wastage, time savings, and contamination in prefilled syringes. Our search encompassed multiple databases, including PubMed and Embase, for studies published between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022.

Study selection and data extraction: Peer-reviewed publications meeting our inclusion criteria underwent rigorous screening, including title, abstract, and full-text article assessments, performed by two reviewers.

Data synthesis: Among reviewed articles, 24 met our eligibility criteria. Selected studies were primarily observational (46%) and conducted in Europe (46%). Our findings indicated that prefilled syringes consistently reduced medication errors (by 10%-73%), adverse events (from 1.1 to 0.275 per 100 administrations), wastage (by up to 80% of drug), and preparation time (from 4.0 to 338.0 seconds) (ranges varied by drug type, setting, and dosage). However, there was limited data on contamination. Economically, prefilled syringes reduced waste and error rates, which may translate into overall savings.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: This review highlights the value of prefilled syringes, which can streamline medication delivery, save nursing time, and reduce preventable medication errors. Moreover, prefilled syringes have the potential to minimize medication wastage, optimizing resource utilization and efficiency in health care settings.

Conclusion and relevance: Our findings provide new insights into clinical and economic benefits of prefilled syringe adoption. These benefits include improved medication delivery and safety, which can lead to time and cost reductions for health care departments, hospitals, and health systems. However, further real-world research on clinical and economic outcomes, especially in contamination, is needed to better understand the benefits of prefilled syringes.

目的:本系统综述的目的是评估与传统制备方法相比,使用预充式注射器给药的临床、经济和卫生资源利用结果。数据来源:我们进行了系统的文献综述,以评估预充式注射器的用药错误、浪费、节省时间和污染等结果。我们检索了多个数据库,包括PubMed和Embase,检索了2017年1月1日至2022年11月1日之间发表的研究。研究选择和数据提取:符合我们纳入标准的同行评审出版物经过严格筛选,包括标题、摘要和全文文章评估,由两名审稿人进行。数据综合:在审查的文章中,有24篇符合我们的资格标准。选定的研究主要是观察性的(46%),并在欧洲进行(46%)。我们的研究结果表明,预充式注射器持续减少用药错误(10%-73%)、不良事件(每100次给药从1.1到0.275)、浪费(高达80%的药物)和制备时间(从4.0到338.0秒)(范围因药物类型、设置和剂量而异)。然而,有关污染的数据有限。从经济上讲,预充注射器减少了浪费和错误率,这可能转化为总体节省。与患者护理和临床实践的相关性:本综述强调了预充式注射器的价值,它可以简化给药,节省护理时间,减少可预防的用药错误。此外,预充式注射器有可能最大限度地减少药物浪费,优化卫生保健机构的资源利用和效率。结论和意义:我们的研究结果为采用预充式注射器的临床和经济效益提供了新的见解。这些好处包括改善药物交付和安全性,这可以减少卫生保健部门、医院和卫生系统的时间和成本。然而,需要对临床和经济结果进行进一步的实际研究,特别是在污染方面,以更好地了解预充式注射器的好处。
{"title":"Assessing the Clinical, Economic, and Health Resource Utilization Impacts of Prefilled Syringes Versus Conventional Medication Administration Methods: Results From a Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Dan Benhamou, Mia Weiss, Matthias Borms, Julia Lucaci, Haymen Girgis, Cecile Frolet, Wesley T Baisley, Gio Shoushi, Kristen A Cribbs, Manuel Wenk","doi":"10.1177/10600280231212890","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231212890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to assess the clinical, economic, and health resource utilization outcomes associated with the use of prefilled syringes in medication administration compared with traditional preparation methods.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate outcomes such as medication errors, wastage, time savings, and contamination in prefilled syringes. Our search encompassed multiple databases, including PubMed and Embase, for studies published between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Peer-reviewed publications meeting our inclusion criteria underwent rigorous screening, including title, abstract, and full-text article assessments, performed by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Among reviewed articles, 24 met our eligibility criteria. Selected studies were primarily observational (46%) and conducted in Europe (46%). Our findings indicated that prefilled syringes consistently reduced medication errors (by 10%-73%), adverse events (from 1.1 to 0.275 per 100 administrations), wastage (by up to 80% of drug), and preparation time (from 4.0 to 338.0 seconds) (ranges varied by drug type, setting, and dosage). However, there was limited data on contamination. Economically, prefilled syringes reduced waste and error rates, which may translate into overall savings.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>This review highlights the value of prefilled syringes, which can streamline medication delivery, save nursing time, and reduce preventable medication errors. Moreover, prefilled syringes have the potential to minimize medication wastage, optimizing resource utilization and efficiency in health care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Our findings provide new insights into clinical and economic benefits of prefilled syringe adoption. These benefits include improved medication delivery and safety, which can lead to time and cost reductions for health care departments, hospitals, and health systems. However, further real-world research on clinical and economic outcomes, especially in contamination, is needed to better understand the benefits of prefilled syringes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138443583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply: Pirtobrutinib: A New and Distinctive Treatment Option for B-Cell Malignancies. 答复:PirtobrutinibPirtobrutinib:治疗 B 细胞恶性肿瘤的独特新疗法。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1177/10600280241258779
Madeline D Schultze, David J Reeves
{"title":"Reply: Pirtobrutinib: A New and Distinctive Treatment Option for B-Cell Malignancies.","authors":"Madeline D Schultze, David J Reeves","doi":"10.1177/10600280241258779","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280241258779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic-Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Approach for Clinical Pharmacists. 系统性硬化相关间质性肺病:文献综述与临床药剂师推荐方法》。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231213672
Hannah Marie Ferrari, Pramodini Kale-Pradhan, Jewel Konja, Michelle Dierker, Amber Lanae Martirosov

Objective: To describe the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

Data sources: A review of the literature was performed using the terms lung diseases, (interstitial/therapy) AND (scleroderma, systemic/therapy) OR (scleroderma, systemic) AND (lung diseases, interstitial/therapy) in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. ClinicalTrials.gov was also searched to identify ongoing studies. The initial search was performed in October 2022, with follow-up searches performed in October 2023.

Study selection and data abstraction: Articles reviewed were limited to those written in the English language, human studies, and adult populations.

Data synthesis: A variety of therapeutic agents, including mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC), rituximab (RTX), nintedanib, and tocilizumab (TCZ) have slowed the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) and disease progression. Only nintedanib and TCZ have a labeled indication for SSc-ILD. Two agents, belimumab and pirfenidone, have shown encouraging results in smaller phase II and phase III studies, but have yet to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Patients with pulmonary manifestations of SSc-ILD have worse outcomes and lower survival rates compared with those without. It is imperative that disease management be individualized to achieve optimal patient-centered care. Pharmacists are uniquely suited to support this individualized management.

Conclusion: Numerous pharmacologic agents have been studied and repurposed in the treatment of SSc-ILD, with nintedanib and TCZ gaining approval to slow the rate of decline in pulmonary function in SSc-ILD. Other agents, including belimumab and pirfenidone, are on the horizon as potential treatment options; but further studies are needed to compare their efficacy and safety with the current standard of care.

目的描述药物治疗系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病(SSc-ILD)的疗效、安全性和临床实用性:在 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中使用肺部疾病(间质性/治疗)和(硬皮病,系统性/治疗)或(硬皮病,系统性)和(肺部疾病,间质性/治疗)等术语进行文献综述。此外,还搜索了 ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定正在进行的研究。首次检索于 2022 年 10 月进行,后续检索于 2023 年 10 月进行:所审查的文章仅限于以英语撰写、人类研究和成人人群:包括霉酚酸盐、硫唑嘌呤、环磷酰胺(CYC)、利妥昔单抗(RTX)、宁替达尼和妥西珠单抗(TCZ)在内的多种治疗药物均可减缓强迫生命容量(FVC)的下降速度和疾病的进展。只有宁替尼(nintedanib)和替西珠单抗(toccilizumab,TCZ)标明了治疗 SSc-ILD 的适应症。贝利木单抗和吡非尼酮这两种药物在较小规模的II期和III期研究中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但尚未获得美国食品药品管理局的批准:与无肺部表现的 SSc-ILD 患者相比,有肺部表现的 SSc-ILD 患者预后更差,存活率更低。当务之急是进行个体化的疾病管理,以实现以患者为中心的最佳护理。药剂师在支持这种个性化管理方面具有得天独厚的优势:结论:在治疗 SSc-ILD 的过程中,对许多药物进行了研究和再利用,其中宁替达尼(nintedanib)和 TCZ 已获得批准,用于减缓 SSc-ILD 患者肺功能的下降速度。包括贝利木单抗和吡非尼酮在内的其他药物即将成为潜在的治疗选择;但还需要进一步的研究来比较它们与当前标准疗法的疗效和安全性。
{"title":"Systemic-Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Approach for Clinical Pharmacists.","authors":"Hannah Marie Ferrari, Pramodini Kale-Pradhan, Jewel Konja, Michelle Dierker, Amber Lanae Martirosov","doi":"10.1177/10600280231213672","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10600280231213672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A review of the literature was performed using the terms lung diseases, (interstitial/therapy) AND (scleroderma, systemic/therapy) OR (scleroderma, systemic) AND (lung diseases, interstitial/therapy) in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. ClinicalTrials.gov was also searched to identify ongoing studies. The initial search was performed in October 2022, with follow-up searches performed in October 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data abstraction: </strong>Articles reviewed were limited to those written in the English language, human studies, and adult populations.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A variety of therapeutic agents, including mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC), rituximab (RTX), nintedanib, and tocilizumab (TCZ) have slowed the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) and disease progression. Only nintedanib and TCZ have a labeled indication for SSc-ILD. Two agents, belimumab and pirfenidone, have shown encouraging results in smaller phase II and phase III studies, but have yet to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>Patients with pulmonary manifestations of SSc-ILD have worse outcomes and lower survival rates compared with those without. It is imperative that disease management be individualized to achieve optimal patient-centered care. Pharmacists are uniquely suited to support this individualized management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous pharmacologic agents have been studied and repurposed in the treatment of SSc-ILD, with nintedanib and TCZ gaining approval to slow the rate of decline in pulmonary function in SSc-ILD. Other agents, including belimumab and pirfenidone, are on the horizon as potential treatment options; but further studies are needed to compare their efficacy and safety with the current standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138795660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeting GPRC5D With Talquetamab: A New Frontier in Bispecific Antibody Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. 用 Talquetamab 靶向 GPRC5D:复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤双特异性抗体疗法的新前沿
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1177/10600280241271192
Jacob Shaver, Daniel Horton, Zachery Halford

Objective: To evaluate the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing, administration, and clinical implications of talquetamab-tgvs, a novel bispecific antibody, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM).

Data sources: A comprehensive English-language literature search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 to May 2024 was conducted using the terms talquetamab, Talvey, JNJ-64407564, and "Multiple Myeloma."

Study selection and data extraction: Relevant clinical trials, guidelines, and prescribing information were systematically reviewed and analyzed.

Data synthesis: Talquetamab-tgvs received accelerated approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration based on results from the pivotal phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 clinical trial, which demonstrated an overall response rate of nearly 74% in key cohorts. The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months in the 0.4 mg/kg weekly dosing cohort and 11.9 months in the 0.8 mg/kg biweekly dosing cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included cytokine release syndrome, skin- and nail-related AEs, dysgeusia, infections, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: As a first-in-class anti-GPRC5D T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody, talquetamab-tgvs represents a compelling treatment option for patients with R/R MM who have received at least 4 prior lines of therapy. No head-to-head clinical trials have been conducted comparing talquetamab-tgvs to other T-cell-redirecting therapies.

Conclusions: While talquetamab-tgvs showed significant efficacy in the pivotal MonumenTAL-1 trial, long-term safety and efficacy data are needed. Additional clinical trials are necessary to establish the optimal timing, sequencing, patient population, and overall role of talquetamab-tgvs in the rapidly evolving treatment landscape of R/R MM.

研究目的评估新型双特异性抗体 talquetamab-tgvs 治疗复发性或难治性(R/R)多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的药理学、临床疗效、安全性、剂量、管理和临床意义:以talquetamab、Talvey、JNJ-64407564和 "多发性骨髓瘤 "为关键词,对2000年1月至2024年5月期间的PubMed和Clinicaltrials.gov进行了全面的英文文献检索:对相关临床试验、指南和处方信息进行了系统回顾和分析:基于关键的I/II期MonumenTAL-1临床试验结果,Talquetamab-tgvs获得了美国食品药品管理局的加速批准。0.4毫克/千克每周给药组群的中位无进展生存期为7.5个月,0.8毫克/千克两周给药组群的中位无进展生存期为11.9个月。治疗相关不良事件(AEs)包括细胞因子释放综合征、皮肤和指甲相关不良事件、口腔溃疡、感染和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征:作为第一类抗GPRC5D T细胞重定向双特异性抗体,talquetamab-tgvs为至少接受过4种既往疗法的R/R MM患者提供了令人信服的治疗选择。目前还没有将talquetamab-tgvs与其他T细胞导向疗法进行头对头比较的临床试验:结论:虽然talquetamab-tgvs在关键的MonumenTAL-1试验中显示出显著疗效,但仍需要长期安全性和疗效数据。有必要进行更多的临床试验,以确定talquetamab-tgvs在快速发展的R/R MM治疗中的最佳时机、排序、患者人群和整体作用。
{"title":"Targeting GPRC5D With Talquetamab: A New Frontier in Bispecific Antibody Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Jacob Shaver, Daniel Horton, Zachery Halford","doi":"10.1177/10600280241271192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241271192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing, administration, and clinical implications of talquetamab-tgvs, a novel bispecific antibody, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive English-language literature search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 to May 2024 was conducted using the terms <i>talquetamab, Talvey</i>, <i>JNJ-64407564</i>, and <i>\"Multiple Myeloma.\"</i></p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Relevant clinical trials, guidelines, and prescribing information were systematically reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Talquetamab-tgvs received accelerated approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration based on results from the pivotal phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 clinical trial, which demonstrated an overall response rate of nearly 74% in key cohorts. The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months in the 0.4 mg/kg weekly dosing cohort and 11.9 months in the 0.8 mg/kg biweekly dosing cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included cytokine release syndrome, skin- and nail-related AEs, dysgeusia, infections, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>As a first-in-class anti-GPRC5D T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody, talquetamab-tgvs represents a compelling treatment option for patients with R/R MM who have received at least 4 prior lines of therapy. No head-to-head clinical trials have been conducted comparing talquetamab-tgvs to other T-cell-redirecting therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While talquetamab-tgvs showed significant efficacy in the pivotal MonumenTAL-1 trial, long-term safety and efficacy data are needed. Additional clinical trials are necessary to establish the optimal timing, sequencing, patient population, and overall role of talquetamab-tgvs in the rapidly evolving treatment landscape of R/R MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotic De-Escalation Practices in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Observational Study. 重症监护病房的抗生素去势实践:一项多中心观察研究
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1177/10600280241271223
Asad E Patanwala, Arwa Abu Sardaneh, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar, Chui Lynn Choo, Alexandra L Dey, Eamon J Duffy, Sarah E Green, Thomas E Hills, Lisa M Howle, Jessica A Joseph, Maxkirivan C Khuon, Cassandra S Koppen, Francis Pang, Jung Yeun Park, Mark A Parlicki, Isha S Shah, Kylie Tran, Priscilla Tran, Mardi A Wills, Jessica H Xu, Marian Youssef

Background: There is little known about antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) practices in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Objective: The objective was to determine the proportion of patients who received ADE within 24 hours of actionable cultures and identify predictors of timely ADE.

Methods: Multicenter cohort study in ICUs of 15 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients were included if they were started on broad-spectrum antibiotics within 24 hours of ICU admission. The ADE was defined as switching from a broad-spectrum agent to a narrower-spectrum agent or antibiotic cessation. The primary outcome was ADE within 24 hours of an actionable culture, where ADE was possible.

Results: The 446 patients included in the study had a mean age of 63 ± 16 years, 60% were male, 32% were mechanically ventilated, and 19% were immunocompromised. Of these, 161 (36.1%) were not eligible for ADE and 37 (8.3%) for whom ADE within 24 hours of actionable culture could not be determined. In the remaining 248 patients, ADE occurred ≤24 hours in 60.5% (n = 150/248) after actionable cultures. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, ADE was less likely to occur within 24 hours for patients with negative cultures (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.92, P = 0.03).

Conclusion and relevance: Timely ADE may not occur in 40% of patients in the ICU and is less likely to occur in patients with negative cultures. Timely ADE can be improved, and patients with negative cultures should be targeted as part of antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

背景:人们对重症监护室(ICU)中抗生素降级(ADE)的做法知之甚少:人们对重症监护病房(ICU)中抗生素降级(ADE)的做法知之甚少:目的:确定在可操作培养 24 小时内接受 ADE 的患者比例,并确定及时 ADE 的预测因素:方法: 对澳大利亚和新西兰 15 家医院的重症监护室进行多中心队列研究。如果成人患者在入住 ICU 24 小时内开始使用广谱抗生素,则将其纳入研究范围。ADE的定义是从广谱抗生素转为窄谱抗生素或停止使用抗生素。主要结果是在可能发生 ADE 的情况下,在可操作培养 24 小时内发生 ADE:参与研究的 446 名患者的平均年龄为 63 ± 16 岁,60% 为男性,32% 接受机械通气,19% 免疫功能低下。其中,161 人(36.1%)不符合 ADE 条件,37 人(8.3%)无法确定 24 小时内的可操作培养 ADE。在剩余的 248 名患者中,60.5%(n = 150/248)的患者在可操作培养后 24 小时内发生 ADE。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,培养阴性患者在24小时内发生ADE的可能性较低(几率比[OR] = 0.48,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.25-0.92,P = 0.03):40%的重症监护病房患者可能不会及时发生ADE,而培养阴性的患者发生ADE的可能性较低。及时的 ADE 是可以改善的,培养阴性的患者应作为抗菌药物管理工作的目标。
{"title":"Antibiotic De-Escalation Practices in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Observational Study.","authors":"Asad E Patanwala, Arwa Abu Sardaneh, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar, Chui Lynn Choo, Alexandra L Dey, Eamon J Duffy, Sarah E Green, Thomas E Hills, Lisa M Howle, Jessica A Joseph, Maxkirivan C Khuon, Cassandra S Koppen, Francis Pang, Jung Yeun Park, Mark A Parlicki, Isha S Shah, Kylie Tran, Priscilla Tran, Mardi A Wills, Jessica H Xu, Marian Youssef","doi":"10.1177/10600280241271223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241271223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little known about antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) practices in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine the proportion of patients who received ADE within 24 hours of actionable cultures and identify predictors of timely ADE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter cohort study in ICUs of 15 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients were included if they were started on broad-spectrum antibiotics within 24 hours of ICU admission. The ADE was defined as switching from a broad-spectrum agent to a narrower-spectrum agent or antibiotic cessation. The primary outcome was ADE within 24 hours of an actionable culture, where ADE was possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 446 patients included in the study had a mean age of 63 ± 16 years, 60% were male, 32% were mechanically ventilated, and 19% were immunocompromised. Of these, 161 (36.1%) were not eligible for ADE and 37 (8.3%) for whom ADE within 24 hours of actionable culture could not be determined. In the remaining 248 patients, ADE occurred ≤24 hours in 60.5% (n = 150/248) after actionable cultures. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, ADE was less likely to occur within 24 hours for patients with negative cultures (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.92, <i>P</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Timely ADE may not occur in 40% of patients in the ICU and is less likely to occur in patients with negative cultures. Timely ADE can be improved, and patients with negative cultures should be targeted as part of antimicrobial stewardship efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1