Introduction and objectives: The six-month abstinence rule for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) patients may exclude candidates from life-saving transplantation without reliably predicting relapse. We compared outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in ALD patients, with modified abstinence criteria.
Patients and methods: ALD patients evaluated for transplantation from 2008-2020 were analyzed. 6-month abstinence was required for DDLT but not for LDLT patients with favorable psychological assessments. Survival analyses were conducted from evaluation i.e., intention-to-treat (ITT) and transplantation. Patients with living donors were categorized as intended for LDLT (ITT-LDLT) and those without as intended for DDLT (ITT-DDLT). Patients who were ineligible for transplantation served as the control group.
Results: Of the 216 ALD patients evaluated, 79 (36.6%) were accepted for transplantation. Five-year ITT survival was superior in the ITT-LDLT group (83.3%) compared to ITT-DDLT (62.6%, P = 0.04) and controls (30.7%, P < 0.001). Among transplant recipients (DDLT n = 34, LDLT n = 20), five-year graft survival was comparable between DDLT and LDLT (79.8% vs 76.5%, P = 0.84) despite only 40% of LDLT patients achieving six-month abstinence. Alcohol relapse rates were comparable between DDLT and LDLT (32.4% vs. 30.0%, P > 0.99). Alcohol dependence (HR=7.32, P < 0.001) and medical non-compliance (HR=4.19, P = 0.007) predicted relapse.
Conclusions: Liver transplantation provided significant survival benefit for carefully selected ALD patients. With comprehensive psychological assessment, patients without psychiatric disorders or compliance issues can achieve excellent outcomes after transplantation.
Introduction and objectives: To assess the utility of telemedicine on provision of hepatitis C care, we compared characteristics and outcomes of HCV-infected patients engaging in standard in-clinic care, telemedicine only (TM), and hybrid (HB) models of care across pre-, peri‑ and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods.
Patients and methods: HCV RNA positive patients assessed between October 2017 and March 2025 at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Program (Ottawa, Canada) were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: Of 1118 patients, 626 (56.0 %) engaged in standard care, 139 (12.4 %) in TM care, and 353 (31.6 %) in HB care. TM group patients were less likely to have immigrated, experienced substance abuse, housing instability, incarceration, or psychiatric conditions, or be based in Ottawa. Utilization of HB and TM care were highest during the pandemic. Across all time periods, HB care demonstrated higher DAA treatment initiation and completion compared to standard or TM care (standard: 81.5 %; TM: 79.1 %; HB: 92.1 %, p < 0.01), (standard: 91.3 %; TM: 93.6 %; HB: 96.3 %, p = 0.02), respectively, with no difference in SVR. During the pandemic, a greater proportion of patients experiencing barriers to cure engaged in HB or TM care and achieved DAA completion (pre: 91.1 %; pandemic: 98.1 %; post: 95.8 %, p < 0.01). HB care was associated with increased odds of DAA initiation (OR = 2.87; 95 % CI 1.82 to 4.53), including patient populations experiencing barriers to cure (OR = 2.35; 95 % CI 1.35 to 4.07).
Conclusions: HB models demonstrate potential in addressing public health challenges and engaging marginalized populations, supporting increased integration into HCV care programs.
Introduction and objectives: The screening accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis tests like FIB-4 in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remains unclear. Using standard cut-offs, this study evaluated FIB-4's agreement with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and identified and validated new thresholds.
Patients and methods: A prospective cohort study (2019-2024) in Belgian and Dutch primary care used VCTE by FibroScan® (Echosens, France) as a proxy for the fibrosis stage. The FIB-4 index was derived from electronic patient data and study blood samples. Agreement between VCTE and FIB-4 was analysed using Weighted Cohen's kappa. New fibrosis cut-offs (≥F2; ≥8 kPa) for ≤65 and >65 years were determined via Youden's Index and validated in a Turkish primary care cohort and a Belgian secondary care T2DM cohort.
Results: Among 563 participants (median age 62 years, 47.1 % male, 14.2 % with T2DM, median BMI 28.2 kg/m²), FIB-4 showed poor agreement with VCTE (κ = 0.138, 95 % CI: 0.069-0.207). Suggested new cut-offs of 1.29 (≤65 years) and 1.72 (>65 years) were proposed. The 1.29 cut-off performed similarly to the existing 1.3 in validation cohorts. In the Türkiye and T2DM cohorts, the 1.72 cut-off improved sensitivity over 2.0 but had lower specificity.
Conclusions: The FIB-4 index showed poor agreement with VCTE and low sensitivity, making it an unreliable standalone diagnostic tool for liver fibrosis in people with MASLD in both primary and secondary care. Alternative non-invasive tests or improved cut-off values are needed for accurate fibrosis detection in clinical practice.
Introduction and objectives: Outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are generally poor, partly due to significant multidrug resistance. HCC heterogeneity decreases the accuracy of traditional prediction models. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the HCC resistome.
Materials and methods: Clinical and transcriptomic data from 371 HCC cases available at TCGA were analyzed. An external dataset (604 patients from 4 cohorts) and 40 HCC samples, in which gene expression was determined by RT-qPCR, were used to validate the prognostic model.
Results: The in silico analysis revealed two distinct clusters of patients based on the expression of resistome genes. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that Cluster 1 (C1) exhibited a better prognosis. Furthermore, the response to sorafenib treatment was better in patients included in C1 than in C2. Cox regression analysis identified the resistome profile as an independent prognostic factor alongside clinicopathological features such as tumor stage and ECOG status. Fifty-eight out of 81 genes examined displayed differential expression between clusters. Thirteen genes demonstrated a correlation between their expression levels and patient survival. In Cox multivariate analysis, SLC22A1, BIRC5, and ABCC1 genes emerged as independent prognostic factors, forming the basis for a risk model. BIRC5 and ABCC1 upregulation and SLC22A1 downregulation were associated with worse outcomes. Experimental results confirmed that patients with higher risk scores had a worse prognosis.
Conclusions: A prognostic signature based on the expression levels of three resistome-associated genes has been defined and can serve as a helpful complementary tool in clinical settings to categorize HCC patients.

