Transfusion science最新文献

Countries vary greatly in their ability to produce their own blood products including albumin and IVIgG. Part of this variability depends on the supply of plasma within the country. As has been seen most recently in the UK, the quality of the plasma and its acceptability for plasma fractionation must also be considered. Therefore concerns regarding the quality of the plasma have been added to those regarding the quantity.

Only a few countries are nationally self sufficient in plasma. This has a marked effect on blood product availability and therefore the ability to treat patients. Unlike most pharmaceuticals, the plasma fractionation industry must rely, for its raw products, on plasma obtained from blood donors. As such this puts it in a potentially compromised situation since neither the supply nor the quality of the raw material can be assured and both of those will vary with time.

This paper reviews the processes through which blood products are made available in 10 different systems including: Canada, England, France, Italy, Norway Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland, South Africa and USA. A series of specific questions were posed and the responses received from the various coauthors and other respondents provide comparative data on blood product availability in different areas of the world.

The Turkish Apheresis Group has maintained a national registry for apheresis activities since 1997. The hemapheresis practice of Turkey in 1998 is summarized in brief detail in this article. A total of 30,136 apheresis procedures were performed at 31 different apheresis centers. At 10 centers, 145 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis were performed on 82 patients in allogeneic setting and at 17 centers, 981 PBSC apheresis were performed on 271 patients in autologous setting. Frequently observed adverse effects during PBSC apheresis were mild tremor and chills, paresthesia and nausea in 15% of the patients and donors. Vascular access complications, particularly observed in autologous setting due to central venous catheters were encountered in 10% of the procedures. Eight hundred and sixty-nine therapeutic plasma exchange procedures were performed at 21 centers on 172 patients, most commonly for neurological disorders and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)/hemolyic uremic syndrome (HUS). Therapeutic cytapheresis procedures like leukapheresis, plateletapheresis and erythrocyte apheresis were performed especially for cytoreduction in myeloproliferative disorders. A total of 204 cytapheresis procedures (66% leukapheresis, 33% plateletapheresis and 1% erythrocytapheresis) were performed on 134 patients in 15 centers. Donor plateletapheresis was the most used apheresis procedure, reaching a total of 28.016 in 1998. Many university hospitals and a few state hospitals are performing above-mentioned apheresis procedures with great success and acceptable side effects. According to these data we are planning prospective trials and will establish National Standards of Practice.

In this communication, after a brief review of current requirements of various stages of leucodepletion qualification/validation processes, we provide some practical examples for the usefulness of long term validation programme for process improvement. It is hoped that the experience gained from this process qualification/validation enhances the awareness to key variables that can influence the overall outcome of filtration programme.