首页 > 最新文献

Annals of vascular surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Mortality Trends for Aortic Aneurysm Rupture in the United States, 1999-2020: A Population-Based Observational Study Using CDC WONDER. 1999-2020年美国主动脉瘤破裂死亡率趋势:CDC WONDER基于人群的观察性研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.034
Muhammad Shaheer Ahmad, Sarmad Imran, Ahmed Abdul Rab, Warda Shahzad, Iqra Nawaz, Abdul Hannan, Mohammedsadeq A Shweliya

Background: Ruptured aortic aneurysm (rAA) is a life-threatening vascular emergency, often fatal before reaching medical care. Despite advances in screening, endovascular repair, and cardiovascular risk control, mortality from rAA remains high. This study aimed to evaluate national trends and disparities in rAA-related mortality among the US adults from 1999 to 2020.

Methods: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research mortality data for adults aged ≥25 years. Deaths were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes I71.1, I71.3, I71.5, and I71.8. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 were calculated using the 2000 US standard population. Temporal trends were assessed with Joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent change and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: rAA led to 118,211 deaths in the United States from 1999 to 2020. The overall AAMR was 2.50 per 100,000, declining from 4.87 in 1999 to 1.15 in 2020 (AAPC = -6.51%). Mortality was higher in men (3.70) than women (1.62) and in rural (3.04) compared to urban areas (2.37). Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest rates (2.74), while NH Asians showed the steepest decline (AAPC = -7.02%). Regionally, the Midwest recorded the highest AAMR (2.94), whereas the Northeast showed the fastest decline (AAPC = -6.83%). Mortality increased sharply with age, peaking in adults ≥85 years.

Conclusion: The US mortality due to rAA has decreased significantly over a period of 20 years, although the underlying factors for this decline cannot be determined from mortality data alone. Nevertheless, this reduction was not even, as women, older adults, and rural residents continue to face disproportionately higher mortality. Ongoing surveillance and targeted efforts to address disparities in access to care are needed to maintain and extend these gains.

背景:主动脉瘤破裂(rAA)是一种危及生命的血管急症,通常在得到医疗护理之前就已死亡。尽管在筛查、血管内修复和心血管风险控制方面取得了进展,但rAA的死亡率仍然很高。本研究旨在评估1999-2020年美国成年人与raa相关的死亡率的全国趋势和差异。方法:对年龄≥25岁成人的CDC WONDER死亡率数据进行回顾性人群分析。使用ICD-10代码I71.1、I71.3、I71.5和I71.8确定死亡。每10万人的年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)是使用2000年美国标准人口计算的。采用Joinpoint回归评估时间趋势,以95%置信区间估计年和平均年百分比变化(APC/AAPC)。结果:1999-2020年间,RAA在美国导致118,211人死亡。总体AAMR为2.50 / 10万,从1999年的4.87 / 10万下降到2020年的1.15 / 10万(AAPC = -6.51%)。男性死亡率(3.70)高于女性(1.62),农村地区死亡率(3.04)高于城市地区(2.37)。NH白人的比率最高(2.74),而NH亚洲人的下降幅度最大(AAPC = -7.02%)。从地区来看,中西部地区AAPC最高(2.94),东北部地区AAPC下降最快(-6.83%)。死亡率随着年龄的增长而急剧增加,在≥85岁的成年人中达到高峰。结论:美国因rAA导致的死亡率在过去20年中显著下降,尽管这种下降的潜在因素不能仅从死亡率数据中确定。然而,由于妇女、老年人和农村居民继续面临不成比例的高死亡率,这种减少并不是均匀的。为了保持和扩大这些成果,需要持续监测和有针对性的努力,以解决获得医疗服务方面的差距。
{"title":"Mortality Trends for Aortic Aneurysm Rupture in the United States, 1999-2020: A Population-Based Observational Study Using CDC WONDER.","authors":"Muhammad Shaheer Ahmad, Sarmad Imran, Ahmed Abdul Rab, Warda Shahzad, Iqra Nawaz, Abdul Hannan, Mohammedsadeq A Shweliya","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ruptured aortic aneurysm (rAA) is a life-threatening vascular emergency, often fatal before reaching medical care. Despite advances in screening, endovascular repair, and cardiovascular risk control, mortality from rAA remains high. This study aimed to evaluate national trends and disparities in rAA-related mortality among the US adults from 1999 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research mortality data for adults aged ≥25 years. Deaths were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes I71.1, I71.3, I71.5, and I71.8. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 were calculated using the 2000 US standard population. Temporal trends were assessed with Joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent change and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rAA led to 118,211 deaths in the United States from 1999 to 2020. The overall AAMR was 2.50 per 100,000, declining from 4.87 in 1999 to 1.15 in 2020 (AAPC = -6.51%). Mortality was higher in men (3.70) than women (1.62) and in rural (3.04) compared to urban areas (2.37). Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest rates (2.74), while NH Asians showed the steepest decline (AAPC = -7.02%). Regionally, the Midwest recorded the highest AAMR (2.94), whereas the Northeast showed the fastest decline (AAPC = -6.83%). Mortality increased sharply with age, peaking in adults ≥85 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The US mortality due to rAA has decreased significantly over a period of 20 years, although the underlying factors for this decline cannot be determined from mortality data alone. Nevertheless, this reduction was not even, as women, older adults, and rural residents continue to face disproportionately higher mortality. Ongoing surveillance and targeted efforts to address disparities in access to care are needed to maintain and extend these gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of Parallel Grafts in Complex Aortic Aneurysms 平行移植物在复杂主动脉瘤中的作用。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.009
Meghan Barber MD, Ross Milner MD
Advancements in technology have significantly improved endovascular techniques for complex aortic aneurysms. However, it is crucial to continue evaluating the role of older techniques alongside newer ones to ensure that the highest quality care is delivered to our patients. This paper aims to clarify the role of parallel grafts in the management of complex aortic aneurysms, particularly with the increased adoption of fenestrated, branched, custom made, and physician modified devices. Parallel grafts continue to be an important tool with regards to the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms particularly in emergencies and in resource-constrained settings.
技术的进步显著改善了复杂主动脉瘤的血管内治疗技术。然而,继续评估旧技术和新技术的作用是至关重要的,以确保向我们的患者提供最高质量的护理。本文旨在阐明平行移植物在复杂主动脉瘤治疗中的作用,特别是随着开窗、分支、定制和医生修改装置的采用越来越多。平行移植物仍然是治疗复杂主动脉瘤的重要工具,特别是在紧急情况和资源有限的情况下。
{"title":"Role of Parallel Grafts in Complex Aortic Aneurysms","authors":"Meghan Barber MD,&nbsp;Ross Milner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in technology have significantly improved endovascular techniques for complex aortic aneurysms. However, it is crucial to continue evaluating the role of older techniques alongside newer ones to ensure that the highest quality care is delivered to our patients. This paper aims to clarify the role of parallel grafts in the management of complex aortic aneurysms, particularly with the increased adoption of fenestrated, branched, custom made, and physician modified devices. Parallel grafts continue to be an important tool with regards to the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms particularly in emergencies and in resource-constrained settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 296-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biosynthetic Prosthesis Omniflow II in Chronic-Limb Threatening Ischemia: Results of the Multicenter National Registry Omni-Femoropopliteal. 生物合成假体omniflow®ii在慢性肢体缺血中的应用。多中心国家登记的结果。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.037
Adriana Baturone, Francisco Javier Serrano, Lino Antonio Camblor, Manuel Alonso, Francisca García, Manuel Rodríguez, Ruth Marquina, Jose María Egaña, Cristina Lozano, Martín Landaluce, Noelia Garzón, Manuel Miralles, Joan Fité, José Román Escudero, David Olmos, Francisco Gomez-Palonés, José Manuel Ligero, Antonio Martín

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents a severe condition associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients lacking optimal autologous vein. The prevalence of CLTI accentuates the need to find a different conduit. Biological prostheses have emerged as a viable alternative given the limitations of conventional synthetic grafts for the treatment of CLTI patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, patency, and limb salvage rates of the Omniflow II biosynthetic prosthesis (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc., Burlington, MA) in infrainguinal bypass procedures among CLTI patients.

Methods: This was a national, prospective, multicenter study conducted between 2019 and 2023, including patients with CLTI who underwent femoropopliteal bypass using Omniflow II. Patency, reintervention, postoperative complications (including graft degeneration or infection), and limb salvage rates were assessed.

Results: A total of 83 patients were included: 28 underwent above-knee femoropopliteal bypass (AK group), and 55 underwent below-knee femoropopliteal bypass (BK group). The mean follow-up was 18 ± 12 months. At 2 years, primary and secondary patency rates were 51% and 71% in the AK group, and 60% and 70% in the BK group, respectively. An amputation-free survival rate of 81,4% at 2 years was observed. Prosthetic infection requiring explantation occurred in 4 patients (4.8%), and aneurysmal degeneration was reported in one case (1.2%) that did not require surgical intervention.

Conclusion: The use of Omniflow II in patients with CLTI demonstrated favorable midterm outcomes, particularly regarding patency in bypasses with distal infragenicular anastomosis. These findings support its consideration as an alternative in patients without available autologous vein.

慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)是一种与高发病率和死亡率相关的严重疾病,特别是在缺乏最佳自体静脉的患者中。CLTI的流行强调了寻找不同导管的必要性。鉴于传统合成移植物治疗CLTI患者的局限性,生物假体已成为一种可行的替代方法。目的:评估Omniflow®II生物合成假体(LeMaitre Vascular, Inc., Burlington, MA)在CLTI患者腹股沟下搭桥手术中的临床结果、通畅性和肢体保留率。方法:这是一项于2019年至2023年进行的全国性、前瞻性、多中心研究,包括使用Omniflow®II进行股腘动脉旁路治疗的CLTI患者。评估通畅、再干预、术后并发症(包括移植物变性或感染)和肢体保留率。结果:共纳入83例患者:行膝上股腘搭桥术28例(AK组),行膝下股腘搭桥术55例(BK组)。平均随访18±12个月。2年时,AK组原发性和继发性通畅率分别为51%和71%,BK组为60%和70%。2年无截肢生存率为81.4%。4例患者(4.8%)发生假体感染,需要切除假体,1例(1.2%)发生动脉瘤变性,不需要手术干预。结论:在CLTI患者中使用Omniflow®II显示出良好的中期结果,特别是在远端腱束下吻合的旁路通畅方面。这些发现支持将其作为无自体静脉患者的替代选择。
{"title":"Biosynthetic Prosthesis Omniflow II in Chronic-Limb Threatening Ischemia: Results of the Multicenter National Registry Omni-Femoropopliteal.","authors":"Adriana Baturone, Francisco Javier Serrano, Lino Antonio Camblor, Manuel Alonso, Francisca García, Manuel Rodríguez, Ruth Marquina, Jose María Egaña, Cristina Lozano, Martín Landaluce, Noelia Garzón, Manuel Miralles, Joan Fité, José Román Escudero, David Olmos, Francisco Gomez-Palonés, José Manuel Ligero, Antonio Martín","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents a severe condition associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients lacking optimal autologous vein. The prevalence of CLTI accentuates the need to find a different conduit. Biological prostheses have emerged as a viable alternative given the limitations of conventional synthetic grafts for the treatment of CLTI patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, patency, and limb salvage rates of the Omniflow II biosynthetic prosthesis (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc., Burlington, MA) in infrainguinal bypass procedures among CLTI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a national, prospective, multicenter study conducted between 2019 and 2023, including patients with CLTI who underwent femoropopliteal bypass using Omniflow II. Patency, reintervention, postoperative complications (including graft degeneration or infection), and limb salvage rates were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 patients were included: 28 underwent above-knee femoropopliteal bypass (AK group), and 55 underwent below-knee femoropopliteal bypass (BK group). The mean follow-up was 18 ± 12 months. At 2 years, primary and secondary patency rates were 51% and 71% in the AK group, and 60% and 70% in the BK group, respectively. An amputation-free survival rate of 81,4% at 2 years was observed. Prosthetic infection requiring explantation occurred in 4 patients (4.8%), and aneurysmal degeneration was reported in one case (1.2%) that did not require surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of Omniflow II in patients with CLTI demonstrated favorable midterm outcomes, particularly regarding patency in bypasses with distal infragenicular anastomosis. These findings support its consideration as an alternative in patients without available autologous vein.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Exposure in TEVAR Versus EVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. TEVAR与EVAR的透视时间和辐射暴露:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.003
Fotios O Efthymiou, Christos F Pitros, Constantine N Antonopoulos, Vasileios I Metaxas, Christos P Dimitroukas, George S Panayiotakis, John D Kakisis, Stavros K Kakkos, Konstantinos G Moulakakis

Background: Ionizing radiation exposure is inherent to endovascular surgery and is associated with adverse health effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared patient radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), focusing on fluoroscopy time (FT), kerma-area product (KAP), and cumulative air kerma (CAK).

Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (June 2015-June 2025) identified English-language studies with ≥20 patients reporting FT, KAP, or CAK during elective EVAR or TEVAR. Pooled means with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects modeling. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I version 2 and publication bias with Egger's test and funnel plots.

Results: Seventy-eight studies (73 EVAR and 5 TEVAR) met inclusion criteria. TEVAR demonstrated significantly shorter FT than EVAR (15.25 vs. 28.50 min; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in KAP (151.08 vs. 147.46 Gycm2; P = 0.970) or CAK (804.92 vs. 1,091.03 mGy; P = 0.090). Heterogeneity was high across all outcomes (I2 > 85%). Only 11.5% of studies reported explicit as low as reasonably achievable compliance, and fusion imaging was used in 9%, more frequently in TEVAR. Publication bias was evident for all radiation metrics.

Conclusion: Radiation exposure during EVAR and TEVAR varies substantially, reflecting anatomical complexity, imaging technology, and procedural practice. TEVAR required shorter FT but produced similar or higher KAP values, likely related to thoracic imaging geometry. Limited TEVAR data restrict the strength of comparative conclusions.

目的:电离辐射暴露是血管内手术所固有的,并与不良健康影响有关。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了患者在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)和胸椎EVAR (TEVAR)期间的辐射暴露,重点关注透视时间(FT)、角面积积(KAP)和累积空气角面积(CAK)。方法:对MEDLINE、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆(2015年6月- 2025年6月)进行符合prisma标准的检索,确定了在选择性EVAR或TEVAR期间报告FT、KAP或CAK的患者≥20例的英语研究。采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间的合并平均值。偏倚风险采用ROBINS-I version 2进行评估,发表偏倚采用Egger检验和漏斗图进行评估。结果:78项研究(73项EVAR, 5项TEVAR)符合纳入标准。TEVAR的FT明显短于EVAR (15.25 vs 28.50 min; p2; p=0.970)或CAK (804.92 vs 1091.03 mGy; p=0.090)。所有结果的异质性都很高(2 - 85%)。只有11.5%的研究报告了明确的ALARA顺应性,9%的研究使用融合成像,在TEVAR中更常见。所有放射指标的发表偏倚都很明显。结论:EVAR和TEVAR期间的辐射暴露差异很大,反映了解剖复杂性、成像技术和手术实践。TEVAR需要更短的FT,但产生相似或更高的KAP值,可能与胸部成像几何形状有关。有限的TEVAR数据限制了比较结论的强度。
{"title":"Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Exposure in TEVAR Versus EVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Fotios O Efthymiou, Christos F Pitros, Constantine N Antonopoulos, Vasileios I Metaxas, Christos P Dimitroukas, George S Panayiotakis, John D Kakisis, Stavros K Kakkos, Konstantinos G Moulakakis","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ionizing radiation exposure is inherent to endovascular surgery and is associated with adverse health effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared patient radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), focusing on fluoroscopy time (FT), kerma-area product (KAP), and cumulative air kerma (CAK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (June 2015-June 2025) identified English-language studies with ≥20 patients reporting FT, KAP, or CAK during elective EVAR or TEVAR. Pooled means with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects modeling. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I version 2 and publication bias with Egger's test and funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight studies (73 EVAR and 5 TEVAR) met inclusion criteria. TEVAR demonstrated significantly shorter FT than EVAR (15.25 vs. 28.50 min; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in KAP (151.08 vs. 147.46 Gycm<sup>2</sup>; P = 0.970) or CAK (804.92 vs. 1,091.03 mGy; P = 0.090). Heterogeneity was high across all outcomes (I<sup>2</sup> > 85%). Only 11.5% of studies reported explicit as low as reasonably achievable compliance, and fusion imaging was used in 9%, more frequently in TEVAR. Publication bias was evident for all radiation metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation exposure during EVAR and TEVAR varies substantially, reflecting anatomical complexity, imaging technology, and procedural practice. TEVAR required shorter FT but produced similar or higher KAP values, likely related to thoracic imaging geometry. Limited TEVAR data restrict the strength of comparative conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"84-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic Heparin Use in Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Access Maintenance for Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies. 系统性肝素在透析患者上肢动静脉通道维持中的应用:一项随机研究的荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.041
Rafael Andrade Rego, Eren Çetinel, Andressa Frankowski Dagostin, Mostafa Labib, Him Shun Kei, Ghislain Irakoze Habiyambere, Dario Madera

Background: A significant proportion of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts for hemodialysis fail due to early thrombosis, necessitating reintervention. The role of systemic heparinization in improving perioperative patency remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative systemic heparin on the patency of upper-limb vascular access creations (fistulas or grafts placement).

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing heparinization versus standard care in adults undergoing arm AVF or graft placement. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. All statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4.

Results: Six studies comprising 1,265 patients were included, of whom 731 (58%) underwent heparinization. Systemic heparinization significantly reduced the odds of early patency loss compared to standard care (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.37-0.92; P = 0.02; I2 = 14%). However, heparin was associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications (OR: 4.24; 95% CI: 1.13-15.9; P = 0.13; I2 = 47%).

Conclusion: Perioperative systemic heparinization significantly improves early patency rates for hemodialysis vascular access in adults undergoing arm fistulization or graft placement; however, there is a risk of increased bleeding events. Heparin may be considered a viable preventive strategy against early thrombosis, though its use should be balanced against individual patient bleeding risk and surgical considerations.

目的:血透动静脉造瘘及移植物因早期血栓形成而失败,需要再次干预。全身性肝素化在改善围手术期通畅中的作用仍不确定。本荟萃分析旨在评估围手术期全身肝素对上肢血管通路(瘘管或移植物放置)通畅的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane数据库,以比较肝素化与标准治疗在接受上肢AVF或移植物置入术的成人中的随机试验。使用随机效应模型合并数据,以95%置信区间(CI)计算优势比(OR)。采用I2统计量评估异质性。所有统计分析均使用Review Manager 5.4进行。结果:6项研究包括1265例患者,其中731例(58%)接受了肝素化治疗。与标准治疗相比,全系统肝素化显著降低了早期通畅丧失的几率(OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.92, p=0.02; I2=14%)。然而,肝素与出血并发症的风险增加相关(OR 4.24; 95% CI 1.13 - 15.9; p=0.13; I2=47%)。结论:围手术期全身肝素化治疗可显著提高接受上肢造瘘或移植物置入术的成人血液透析血管通路的早期通畅率;然而,有出血事件增加的风险。肝素可能被认为是预防早期血栓形成的可行策略,但其使用应与个别患者出血风险和手术考虑相平衡。
{"title":"Systemic Heparin Use in Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Access Maintenance for Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies.","authors":"Rafael Andrade Rego, Eren Çetinel, Andressa Frankowski Dagostin, Mostafa Labib, Him Shun Kei, Ghislain Irakoze Habiyambere, Dario Madera","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.041","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts for hemodialysis fail due to early thrombosis, necessitating reintervention. The role of systemic heparinization in improving perioperative patency remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative systemic heparin on the patency of upper-limb vascular access creations (fistulas or grafts placement).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing heparinization versus standard care in adults undergoing arm AVF or graft placement. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics. All statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies comprising 1,265 patients were included, of whom 731 (58%) underwent heparinization. Systemic heparinization significantly reduced the odds of early patency loss compared to standard care (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.37-0.92; P = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 14%). However, heparin was associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications (OR: 4.24; 95% CI: 1.13-15.9; P = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 47%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative systemic heparinization significantly improves early patency rates for hemodialysis vascular access in adults undergoing arm fistulization or graft placement; however, there is a risk of increased bleeding events. Heparin may be considered a viable preventive strategy against early thrombosis, though its use should be balanced against individual patient bleeding risk and surgical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflection of the Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Vascular Surgery Outcomes: A Multicenter Analysis of Peripheral Vascular Interventions and Infrainguinal Bypass COVID-19感染对血管手术结果影响的反映:外周血管干预和腹股沟下搭桥的多中心分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.038
Sabrina Straus , Nadin Elsayed , William P. Robinson , Mahmoud Malas

Background

The impact of COVID-19 on vascular surgery patients remains incompletely understood. Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with vascular disease are at an increased risk for complications. This study aimed to describe postoperative outcomes and 1-year survival in COVID-19 patients undergoing vascular procedures using a multicenter real-world dataset.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypass procedures in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2020-2022). Multivariable logistic regression assessed in-hospital adverse events; Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed 1-year survival.

Results

Among the 16,608 PVI patients and 10,460 infrainguinal bypass patients, urgent/emergent procedures were more common in COVID-19 patients (PVI: 50.9%; bypass: 40%). COVID-19 patients undergoing PVI had higher in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 1.8%, odds ratio [OR]: 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–7.9), ipsilateral amputation (17.7% vs. 10.6%, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2–2.5), renal complications (4.1% vs. 1.8%, OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.5), and pulmonary complications (6.8% vs. 1.2%, OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 3.0–7.9) compared with non-COVID patients. COVID-19 infrainguinal bypass patients had higher rates of ipsilateral amputation (OR: 1.6, 95% CI (1.0–2.6), P = 0.049). One-year mortality was higher in COVID-19 PVI patients (hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–2.9). There was no effect of COVID-19 infection on 1-year mortality in bypass patients.

Conclusion

COVID-19 patients undergoing PVI faced significantly increased risks of renal and pulmonary complications, limb loss, and mortality. Those undergoing infrainguinal bypass also had higher limb loss risk. Surgeons should ensure optimal medical optimization, close monitoring, and consider deferring elective procedures to minimize morbidity and mortality.
背景:COVID-19对血管外科患者的影响尚不完全清楚。新出现的证据表明,患有血管疾病的人发生并发症的风险增加。本研究旨在使用多中心真实世界数据集描述接受血管手术的COVID-19患者的术后结果和一年生存率。方法:我们回顾性回顾了血管质量倡议(2020-2022)中接受外周血管介入(PVI)和腹股沟下搭桥手术的患者。多变量logistic回归评价院内不良事件;Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析评估一年生存率。结果:在16608例PVI患者和10460例腹股沟下搭桥患者中,COVID-19患者急诊手术较多(PVI: 50.9%,旁路:40%)。与非covid患者相比,接受PVI的COVID-19患者的住院死亡率(10.9% vs 1.8%, OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 3.2-7.9)、同侧截肢(17.7% vs 10.6%, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.5)、肾脏并发症(4.1% vs 1.8%, OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.5)和肺部并发症(6.8% vs 1.2%, OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 3.0-7.9)更高。COVID-19腹股沟下搭桥患者的同侧截肢率较高(OR: 1.6, 95%CI (1.0-2.6), P=0.049)。COVID-19 PVI患者一年死亡率更高(HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-2.9)。在搭桥患者中无显著差异。结论:接受PVI治疗的COVID-19患者面临肾脏和肺部并发症、肢体丧失和死亡风险显著增加。接受腹股沟下旁路手术的患者也有更高的肢体丧失风险。外科医生应确保最佳的医疗优化,密切监测,并考虑推迟选择性手术,以尽量减少发病率和死亡率。
{"title":"Reflection of the Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Vascular Surgery Outcomes: A Multicenter Analysis of Peripheral Vascular Interventions and Infrainguinal Bypass","authors":"Sabrina Straus ,&nbsp;Nadin Elsayed ,&nbsp;William P. Robinson ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Malas","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of COVID-19 on vascular surgery patients remains incompletely understood. Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with vascular disease are at an increased risk for complications. This study aimed to describe postoperative outcomes and 1-year survival in COVID-19 patients undergoing vascular procedures using a multicenter real-world dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypass procedures in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2020-2022). Multivariable logistic regression assessed in-hospital adverse events; Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed 1-year survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 16,608 PVI patients and 10,460 infrainguinal bypass patients, urgent/emergent procedures were more common in COVID-19 patients (PVI: 50.9%; bypass: 40%). COVID-19 patients undergoing PVI had higher in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 1.8%, odds ratio [OR]: 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–7.9), ipsilateral amputation (17.7% vs. 10.6%, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2–2.5), renal complications (4.1% vs. 1.8%, OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.5), and pulmonary complications (6.8% vs. 1.2%, OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 3.0–7.9) compared with non-COVID patients. COVID-19 infrainguinal bypass patients had higher rates of ipsilateral amputation (OR: 1.6, 95% CI (1.0–2.6), <em>P</em> = 0.049). One-year mortality was higher in COVID-19 PVI patients (hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–2.9). There was no effect of COVID-19 infection on 1-year mortality in bypass patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>COVID-19 patients undergoing PVI faced significantly increased risks of renal and pulmonary complications, limb loss, and mortality. Those undergoing infrainguinal bypass also had higher limb loss risk. Surgeons should ensure optimal medical optimization, close monitoring, and consider deferring elective procedures to minimize morbidity and mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Outcomes of Off-the-Shelf Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis for Type IA Endoleak from Failed Infrarenal and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repairs 现成胸腹多支腔内假体治疗肾下和复杂血管内主动脉修复失败的IA型腔内漏的早期结果
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.004
Kenneth Han , Ariela Zenilman , Alyssa J. Pyun, Zachary Rengel, Miju Bae, Sukgu M. Han

Background

The Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis (TAMBE) is the first off-the-shelf four-vessel inner-branched endograft to obtain commercial approval for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. While off-label TAMBE has been applied to type IA endoleak from failed endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), there is paucity of data regarding outcomes involving this construct. Here, we present early outcomes on rescue TAMBE for type IA endoleak from failed infrarenal and complex EVARs.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who received TAMBE at a single institution from April 2020 to February 2025 was performed. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative metrics, and 30-day outcomes were examined.

Results

Ten patients who received rescue TAMBE for failed EVAR were included. The median interval between failed EVAR and TAMBE was 7 years. Three patients underwent previous attempts at type IA endoleak repair. Overall average age was 80.6 years and maximum aneurysm diameter was 86 mm. Pararenal aneurysms were the most common aneurysm type. Failed previous EVAR devices included infrarenal EVAR (8), single snorkel EVAR (1), and three-vessel Zenith fenestrated (1). Intraoperative metrics included operative time of 259 min, fluoroscopy time of 59.8 min, and contrast usage of 109 mL. Technical success was 100% with no perioperative mortalities. Thirty-day reintervention rate was 10%. This patient required right renal artery angioplasty and stenting due to branch occlusion.

Conclusion

TAMBE is a promising option for rescue aortic repair of previously failed infrarenal and complex EVAR, with excellent procedural and perioperative outcomes. Longer-term follow-up and larger studies are ongoing to define its durability and broader applicability.
简介:胸腹多分支内假体(TAMBE)是首个获得商业批准用于治疗复杂腹部和胸腹主动脉瘤的现成的四血管内分支内假体。虽然标签外TAMBE已应用于血管内主动脉修复失败(EVAR)引起的IA型内漏,但缺乏有关该结构结果的数据。在这里,我们介绍了抢救TAMBE对失败的肾下和复杂EVARs的IA型内漏的早期结果。方法:回顾性分析2020年4月至2025年2月在单一机构接受TAMBE治疗的患者。检查基线特征、术中指标和30天结果。结果:纳入10例因EVAR失败接受TAMBE抢救的患者。失败的EVAR和TAMBE之间的中位间隔为7年。三名患者曾尝试过IA型内漏修复。总体平均年龄80.6岁,最大动脉瘤直径86mm。肾旁动脉瘤是最常见的动脉瘤类型。先前失败的EVAR装置包括:静脉内EVAR(8例)、单通气管EVAR(1例)和三血管Zenith开窗EVAR(1例)。术中指标包括手术时间259分钟,透视时间59.8分钟,对比剂用量109 mL。技术成功率为100%,无围手术期死亡。30天再干预率为10%。由于右肾动脉闭塞,该患者需要进行右肾动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。结论:TAMBE对于先前失败的肾下和复杂EVAR的抢救性主动脉修复是一种有希望的选择,具有良好的手术和围手术期效果。长期随访和更大规模的研究正在进行中,以确定其耐久性和更广泛的适用性。
{"title":"Early Outcomes of Off-the-Shelf Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis for Type IA Endoleak from Failed Infrarenal and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repairs","authors":"Kenneth Han ,&nbsp;Ariela Zenilman ,&nbsp;Alyssa J. Pyun,&nbsp;Zachary Rengel,&nbsp;Miju Bae,&nbsp;Sukgu M. Han","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis (TAMBE) is the first off-the-shelf four-vessel inner-branched endograft to obtain commercial approval for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. While off-label TAMBE has been applied to type IA endoleak from failed endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), there is paucity of data regarding outcomes involving this construct. Here, we present early outcomes on rescue TAMBE for type IA endoleak from failed infrarenal and complex EVARs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of patients who received TAMBE at a single institution from April 2020 to February 2025 was performed. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative metrics, and 30-day outcomes were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten patients who received rescue TAMBE for failed EVAR were included. The median interval between failed EVAR and TAMBE was 7 years. Three patients underwent previous attempts at type IA endoleak repair. Overall average age was 80.6 years and maximum aneurysm diameter was 86 mm. Pararenal aneurysms were the most common aneurysm type. Failed previous EVAR devices included infrarenal EVAR (8), single snorkel EVAR (1), and three-vessel Zenith fenestrated (1). Intraoperative metrics included operative time of 259 min, fluoroscopy time of 59.8 min, and contrast usage of 109 mL. Technical success was 100% with no perioperative mortalities. Thirty-day reintervention rate was 10%. This patient required right renal artery angioplasty and stenting due to branch occlusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAMBE is a promising option for rescue aortic repair of previously failed infrarenal and complex EVAR, with excellent procedural and perioperative outcomes. Longer-term follow-up and larger studies are ongoing to define its durability and broader applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. 经皮腔内球囊血管成形术对外周动脉疾病患者炎症生物标志物的影响。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.039
Gizem Kaynar Beyaz, Metin Onur Beyaz, Sevgi Kalkanlı Tas

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is characterized by chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) restores limb perfusion, but its effects on systemic inflammatory burden are not fully defined. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of PTA on 30-day inflammatory biomarkers and hematological parameters in patients with lower extremity PAD.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 47 adults with newly diagnosed PAD (lower extremity stenosis ≥50%, ankle-brachial index [ABI] <0.90) underwent PTA. Venous blood samples were collected 1 week before and 30 days after the intervention. Plasma interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, transforming growth factor-beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, fibrinogen, and complete blood count were performed to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Paired tests were used, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) decreased significantly (all P < 0.001), IL-10 increased (P = 0.002) and IL-13 and transforming growth factor-beta remained unchanged. CRP and fibrinogen decreased (both P < 0.001), procalcitonin slightly increased (P = 0.018), and NLR decreased from 2.8 ± 0.9 to 2.1 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001). ΔABI was inversely correlated with ΔCRP (r = -0.334, P = 0.022) and Δfibrinogen (r = -0.315, P = 0.031). ABI improvement was greater in men, TNF-α reduction was greater in infrainguinal lesions, and IL-8 and NLR responses differed by smoking status.

Conclusion: PTA leads to a significant short-term improvement in limb perfusion and a concomitant reduction in systemic inflammatory burden, suggesting beneficial immunomodulatory effects beyond mechanical revascularization.

背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)以慢性炎症和内皮功能障碍为特征。经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(PTA)可恢复肢体灌注,但其对全身炎症负荷的影响尚不完全明确。目的:评价PTA对下肢PAD患者30天炎症生物标志物和血液学参数的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,47名新诊断为PAD的成年人(下肢狭窄≥50%,踝关节-肱指数[ABI])结果:促炎细胞因子(IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α)显著降低(均为p)结论:PTA可显著改善肢体灌注,同时减轻全身炎症负担,提示除机械血运重建术外有益的免疫调节作用。
{"title":"Effect of Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.","authors":"Gizem Kaynar Beyaz, Metin Onur Beyaz, Sevgi Kalkanlı Tas","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.039","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is characterized by chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) restores limb perfusion, but its effects on systemic inflammatory burden are not fully defined. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of PTA on 30-day inflammatory biomarkers and hematological parameters in patients with lower extremity PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 47 adults with newly diagnosed PAD (lower extremity stenosis ≥50%, ankle-brachial index [ABI] <0.90) underwent PTA. Venous blood samples were collected 1 week before and 30 days after the intervention. Plasma interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, transforming growth factor-beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, fibrinogen, and complete blood count were performed to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Paired tests were used, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) decreased significantly (all P < 0.001), IL-10 increased (P = 0.002) and IL-13 and transforming growth factor-beta remained unchanged. CRP and fibrinogen decreased (both P < 0.001), procalcitonin slightly increased (P = 0.018), and NLR decreased from 2.8 ± 0.9 to 2.1 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001). ΔABI was inversely correlated with ΔCRP (r = -0.334, P = 0.022) and Δfibrinogen (r = -0.315, P = 0.031). ABI improvement was greater in men, TNF-α reduction was greater in infrainguinal lesions, and IL-8 and NLR responses differed by smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTA leads to a significant short-term improvement in limb perfusion and a concomitant reduction in systemic inflammatory burden, suggesting beneficial immunomodulatory effects beyond mechanical revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"72-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Open Surgical Repair for Post-EVAR Endoleaks: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Mid-Term Follow-Up. 一项中期随访的回顾性队列研究:evar后腔隙开放性手术修复的结果。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.033
Zhigao Li, Zhipeng Chen, Jing Cai, Zhao Liu, Xiaoqiang Li, Tong Qiao

Background: To assess perioperative safety and mid-term durability of open surgical repair (OSR) as a salvage therapy for endoleaks after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 23 consecutive patients (21 males, 2 females; mean age 65.6 ± 10.6 years) undergoing OSR for persistent endoleaks at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between May 2018 and July 2023. Endoleak subtypes included type I (n = 7), type II (n = 14), type III (n = 1), and type IV (n = 1). Primary end points were 30-day mortality and major adverse events, with secondary end points encompassing 3-year survival and reintervention rate.

Results: The 30-day mortality of the cohort reached 13.0% (3/23), attributed to pulmonary infection (n = 1), circulatory collapse (n = 1), and septic shock (n = 1). Notably, 34.8% (8/23) developed pulmonary complications, whereas 21.7% (5/23) experienced acute kidney injury. At a median follow-up of 30.6 months (interquartile range 25.4-38.9), the 3-year overall survival rate was 86.9%. No aorta-related deaths occurred during the follow-up; only 1 patient (4.3%) required secondary intervention for distal iliac artery redilation.

Conclusion: OSR constitutes a definitive solution for endoleak management postendovascular aneurysm repair , demonstrating acceptable perioperative risk and durable mid-term outcomes. Although pulmonary and renal complications remain noteworthy short-term concerns, the technique offers low reintervention rates and stable survival trajectories, particularly in the absence of aorta-related mortality.

目的:评估开放手术修复术(OSR)作为血管内动脉瘤修复失败后内溢的抢救治疗的围手术期安全性和中期持久性。方法:2018年5月至2023年7月,连续23例患者(男性21例,女性2例,平均年龄65.6±10.6岁)在******接受OSR治疗持续性内漏。Endoleak亚型包括I型(n=7)、II型(n=14)、III型(n=1)和IV型(n=1)。主要终点是30天死亡率和主要不良事件(MAEs),次要终点包括3年生存率和再干预率。结果:30天死亡率为13.0%(3/23),主要原因为肺部感染(n=1)、循环衰竭(n=1)和感染性休克(n=1)。值得注意的是,34.8%(8/23)出现肺部并发症,21.7%(5/23)出现急性肾损伤。中位随访30.6个月(IQR 25.4-38.9), 3年总生存率为86.9%。随访期间未发生主动脉相关死亡;只有1例(4.3%)患者需要髂远端动脉再扩张的二次干预。结论:OSR是evar后内漏管理的明确解决方案,表现出可接受的围手术期风险和持久的中期结果。虽然肺部和肾脏并发症仍然是值得关注的短期问题,但该技术提供了低的再干预率和稳定的生存轨迹,特别是在没有主动脉相关死亡率的情况下。
{"title":"Outcomes of Open Surgical Repair for Post-EVAR Endoleaks: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Mid-Term Follow-Up.","authors":"Zhigao Li, Zhipeng Chen, Jing Cai, Zhao Liu, Xiaoqiang Li, Tong Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.12.033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess perioperative safety and mid-term durability of open surgical repair (OSR) as a salvage therapy for endoleaks after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 23 consecutive patients (21 males, 2 females; mean age 65.6 ± 10.6 years) undergoing OSR for persistent endoleaks at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between May 2018 and July 2023. Endoleak subtypes included type I (n = 7), type II (n = 14), type III (n = 1), and type IV (n = 1). Primary end points were 30-day mortality and major adverse events, with secondary end points encompassing 3-year survival and reintervention rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-day mortality of the cohort reached 13.0% (3/23), attributed to pulmonary infection (n = 1), circulatory collapse (n = 1), and septic shock (n = 1). Notably, 34.8% (8/23) developed pulmonary complications, whereas 21.7% (5/23) experienced acute kidney injury. At a median follow-up of 30.6 months (interquartile range 25.4-38.9), the 3-year overall survival rate was 86.9%. No aorta-related deaths occurred during the follow-up; only 1 patient (4.3%) required secondary intervention for distal iliac artery redilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSR constitutes a definitive solution for endoleak management postendovascular aneurysm repair , demonstrating acceptable perioperative risk and durable mid-term outcomes. Although pulmonary and renal complications remain noteworthy short-term concerns, the technique offers low reintervention rates and stable survival trajectories, particularly in the absence of aorta-related mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"128-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National Database Evaluation of Endovascular versus Open Surgical Approaches for Iliac Vessel Injuries 国家数据库评估髂血管损伤的血管内与开放手术入路。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.007
Gabriela Santos-Revilla , Alejandro Pizano , Mehmet Alagoz , Elisa Szydziak , Nwe Oo Mon , Sara Cardozo-Stolberg , Sarah Alamprese , L.D. George Angus , Anantha Ramanathan

Background

Iliac vessel injuries are linked to a high mortality rate in trauma surgery. Endovascular repair of these injuries has gained recognition as a less invasive alternative, with possibly better outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed of all iliac vessel injuries for the year 2022. The endpoint was the in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and critical care unit lengths of stay, complications, and major amputation rates.

Results

Out of a total of 2,300 patients with iliac vessel injuries, 74.4% were male with an average age of 46 years (±20.1 years). The majority (68.9%) had blunt trauma, while 31.1% had penetrating trauma. Treatment modalities included endovascular procedures (41.9%), open surgery (25.1%), and nonoperative management (33.0%). Endovascular treatment was associated with lower mortality rates (18%) than open surgery (26%) and nonoperative management (19.4%) (P < 0.05). Patients undergoing endovascular interventions were older and had higher Injury Severity Scores (P < 0.05). Complex iliac injuries had higher rates of complications and mortality than isolated injuries (P < 0.05). Factors associated with increased mortality included age over 55 (odds ratio [OR] 2.33), higher Injury Severity Scores (OR 1.07), and penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 2.82) (P < 0.001). Endovascular intervention was associated with a significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality than open vascular treatment in penetrating trauma (adjusted OR 0.067, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our results underscore the increasing role of endovascular intervention in managing iliac trauma and suggest a mortality benefit in specific injury pattern scenarios.
背景:髂血管损伤与创伤手术的高死亡率有关。这些损伤的血管内修复已经被认为是一种侵入性较小的选择,可能有更好的结果。方法:对国家创伤数据库中2022年所有髂血管损伤进行回顾性分析。终点是住院死亡率。次要结局包括住院和重症监护病房的住院时间、并发症和主要截肢率。结果:2300例髂血管损伤患者中,男性占74.4%,平均年龄46岁(±20.1岁)。绝大多数(68.9%)为钝性创伤,31.1%为穿透性创伤。治疗方式包括血管内手术(41.9%)、开放手术(25.1%)和非手术治疗(33.0%)。与开放手术(26%)和非手术治疗(19.4%)相比,血管内治疗的死亡率(18%)更低。结论:我们的研究结果强调了血管内干预在治疗髂创伤中的作用越来越大,并表明在特定的损伤模式下,血管内干预可以降低死亡率。
{"title":"National Database Evaluation of Endovascular versus Open Surgical Approaches for Iliac Vessel Injuries","authors":"Gabriela Santos-Revilla ,&nbsp;Alejandro Pizano ,&nbsp;Mehmet Alagoz ,&nbsp;Elisa Szydziak ,&nbsp;Nwe Oo Mon ,&nbsp;Sara Cardozo-Stolberg ,&nbsp;Sarah Alamprese ,&nbsp;L.D. George Angus ,&nbsp;Anantha Ramanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Iliac vessel injuries are linked to a high mortality rate in trauma surgery. Endovascular repair of these injuries has gained recognition as a less invasive alternative, with possibly better outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed of all iliac vessel injuries for the year 2022. The endpoint was the in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and critical care unit lengths of stay, complications, and major amputation rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of a total of 2,300 patients with iliac vessel injuries, 74.4% were male with an average age of 46 years (±20.1 years). The majority (68.9%) had blunt trauma, while 31.1% had penetrating trauma. Treatment modalities included endovascular procedures (41.9%), open surgery (25.1%), and nonoperative management (33.0%). Endovascular treatment was associated with lower mortality rates (18%) than open surgery (26%) and nonoperative management (19.4%) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Patients undergoing endovascular interventions were older and had higher Injury Severity Scores (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Complex iliac injuries had higher rates of complications and mortality than isolated injuries (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Factors associated with increased mortality included age over 55 (odds ratio [OR] 2.33), higher Injury Severity Scores (OR 1.07), and penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 2.82) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Endovascular intervention was associated with a significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality than open vascular treatment in penetrating trauma (adjusted OR 0.067, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results underscore the increasing role of endovascular intervention in managing iliac trauma and suggest a mortality benefit in specific injury pattern scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145958304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of vascular surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1