Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases最新文献

Objectives: Arterial wall inflammation and remodelling are the characteristic features of Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). It has been proposed that vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are the main targeted cells of inflammatory damage and participate in arterial remodelling in TAK. Whether VSMCs are actively involved in arterial wall inflammation has not been elucidated. Studies have shown that cellular senescence in tissue is closely related to local inflammation persistence. We aimed to investigate whether VSMCs senescence contributes to vascular inflammation and the prosenescent factors in TAK.

Methods: VSMCs senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype were detected by histological examination, bulk RNA-Seq and single-cell RNA-seq conducted on vascular surgery samples of TAK patients. The key prosenescent factors and the downstream signalling pathway were investigated in a series of in vitro and ex vivo experiments.

Results: Histological findings, primary cell culture and transcriptomic analyses demonstrated that VSMCs of TAK patients had the features of premature senescence and contributed substantially to vascular inflammation by upregulating the expression of senescence-associated inflammatory cytokines. IL-6 was found to be the critical cytokine that drove VSMCs senescence and senescence-associated mitochondrial dysfunction in TAK. Mechanistically, IL-6-induced non-canonical mitochondrial localisation of phosphorylated STAT3 (Tyr705) prevented mitofusin 2 (MFN2) from proteasomal degradation, and subsequently promoted senescence-associated mitochondrial dysfunction and VSMCs senescence. Mitochondrial STAT3 or MFN2 inhibition ameliorated VSMCs senescence in ex vivo cultured arteries of TAK patients.

Conclusions: VSMCs present features of cellular senescence and are actively involved in vascular inflammation in TAK. Vascular IL-6-mitochondrial STAT3-MFN2 signalling is an important driver of VSMCs senescence.

Objective: To report long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using pooled data from three randomised clinical trials (RCT) followed by open-label extension (OLE) study.

Methods: Cumulative data from three phase 3 core trials and their OLE were analysed. Safety variables assessed included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest and laboratory results. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) <3.2, CDAI remission and low disease activity (LDA), SDAI remission and LDA, HAQ-DI decrease of 0.22 unit and Boolean 2.0 remission.

Results: A total of 2304 patients received OKZ in combination with MTX either once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks. Event rates per 100 patient-years in OKZ every 2 weeks and OKZ every 4 weeks, respectively, were 9.57 and 9.13 for SAEs; 2.95 and 2.34 for serious infections; 0.09 and 0.05 for gastrointestinal perforations; 0.58 and 0.83 for major adverse cardiovascular events; and 0.45 and 0.50 for malignancies. No increase in the rate of any AE was observed over 106 weeks of treatment. The evaluation of laboratory variables demonstrated the expected changes, like neutropenia, elevation of liver enzymes and blood lipids. Clinical response rates remained stable during the OLE.

Conclusion: The long-term safety and tolerability of OKZ in combination with MTX remained stable. The efficacy of OKZ was maintained through week 106. These findings support OKZ as a treatment option for patients with active RA.

Objective: To understand if autoantibodies account for racial variation in disease severity, we compared autoantibody distribution and associated phenotype between self-identified black and white systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

Methods: 803 black and 2178 white SSc patients had systematic testing for autoantibodies using Euroimmun (centromere (ACA), RNA-polymerase III (POLR3), Scl70, PM/Scl, NOR90, Th/To, Ku, U3RNP and Ro52) and commercial ELISA (U1RNP). In this observational study, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-identified race and outcomes, adjusting for autoantibodies. To estimate whether the effect of race was mediated by autoantibody status, race coefficients from multivariate models including and excluding autoantibodies were compared.

Results: Anti-Scl70, anti-U1RNP, anti-U3RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-Ku and anti-NOR90 were more common in the black cohort than in the white cohort, which was enriched for ACA, anti-POLR3 and anti-PM/Scl. Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe Raynaud's, skin, lung, gastrointestinal and renal disease whereas white individuals had a higher prevalence of severe heart and muscle disease. Adjusting for autoantibodies decreased the effect of race on outcome for telangiectasias, forced vital capacity <70%, pulmonary hypertension and severe lung, heart, muscle and gastrointestinal disease by 11%-44% and increased the association between race and renal crisis and severe kidney disease by 37%-52%.

Conclusions: This study is the largest systematic analysis of autoantibody responses in a geographically diverse population of black SSc patients. Black and white individuals with SSc have distinct autoantibody profiles. Autoantibodies explain only a fraction of the effect of race on clinical outcomes, suggesting other factors contribute to disparate outcomes between these groups.

Rheumatologists and rheumatology have had a prominent role in the conceptualisation of nociplastic pain since the prototypical nociplastic pain condition is fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia had been previously known as fibrositis, until it became clear that this condition could be differentiatied from autoimmune disorders because of a lack of systemic inflammation and tissue damage. Nociplastic pain is now thought to be a third descriptor/mechanism of pain, in addition to nociceptive pain (pain due to peripheral damage or inflammation) and neuropathic pain. Nociplastic pain can occur in isolation, or as a co-morbidity with other mechanisms of pain, as commonly occurs in individuals with autoimmune disorders. We now know that the cardinal symptoms of nociplastic pain are widespread pain (or pain in areas not without evidence of inflammation/damage), accompanied by fatigue, sleep and memory issues. There is objective evidence of amplification/augmentation of pain, as well as of non-painful stimuli such as the brightness of lights and unpleasantness of sound or odors. Nociplastic pain states can be triggered by a variety of stressors such as trauma, infections and chronic stressors. Together these features suggest that the central nervous system (CNS) is playing a major role in causing and maintaining nociplastic pain, but these CNS factors may in some be driven by ongoing peripheral nociceptive input. The most effective drug therapies for nociplastic pain are non-opioid centrally acting analgesics such as tricyclics, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and gabapentinoids. However the mainstay of therapy of nociplastic pain is the use of a variety of non-pharmacological integrative therapies, especially those which improve activity/exercise, sleep and address psychological co-morbidities.

Objective: To develop international consensus-based recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

Methods: A task force including 29 rheumatologists/internists, 4 general practitioners, 4 patients and a healthcare professional emerged from the international giant cell arteritis and PMR study group. The task force supplied clinical questions, subsequently transformed into Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format. A systematic literature review was conducted followed by online meetings to formulate and vote on final recommendations. Levels of evidence (LOE) (1-5 scale) and agreement (LOA) (0-10 scale) were evaluated.

Results: Two overarching principles and five recommendations were developed. LOE was 4-5 and LOA ranged between 8.5 and 9.7. The recommendations suggest that (1) each individual with suspected or recently diagnosed PMR should be considered for specialist evaluation, (2) before referring an individual with suspected PMR to specialist care, a thorough history and clinical examination should be performed and preferably complemented with urgent basic laboratory investigations, (3) individuals with suspected PMR with severe symptoms should be referred for specialist evaluation using rapid access strategies, (4) in individuals with suspected PMR who are referred via rapid access, the commencement of glucocorticoid therapy should be deferred until after specialist evaluation and (5) individuals diagnosed with PMR in specialist care with a good initial response to glucocorticoids and a low risk of glucocorticoid related adverse events can be managed in primary care.

Conclusions: These are the first international recommendations for referral of individuals with suspected PMR, which complement the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology management guidelines for established PMR.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) versus a sham placebo in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).

Methods: Participants were randomised in a prospective, double-blind, controlled study to receive either sham injection or intradiscal injection of 20 million allogeneic BM-MSC, between April 2018 and December 2022. The first co-primary endpoint was the rate of responders defined by improvement of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain of at least 20% and 20 mm, or improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of 20% between baseline and month 12. The secondary structural co-primary endpoint was assessed by the disc fluid content measured by quantitative MRI T2, between baseline and month 12. Secondary endpoints included pain VAS, ODI, the Short Form (SF)-36 and the minimal clinically important difference in all timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months). We determined the immune response associated with allogeneic cell injection between baseline and 6 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded.

Results: 114 patients were randomised (n=58, BM-MSC group; n=56, sham placebo group). At 12 months, the primary outcome was not reached (74% in the BM-MSC group vs 69% in the placebo group; p=0.77). The groups did not differ in all secondary outcomes. No SAE related to the intervention occurred.

Conclusions: While our study did not conclusively demonstrate the efficacy of allogeneic BM-MSCs for LBP, the procedure was safe. Long-term outcomes of MSC therapy for LBP are still being studied.

Trial registration number: EudraCT 2017-002092-25/ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03737461.