ANZ Journal of Surgery最新文献

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short-term perioperative morbidity, long-term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

Results: The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between groups.

Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease-free survival.

The Supervisor Support Consensus Statement has been developed after consultation with supervisors of surgical training for the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) programmes in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand and other key stakeholders. Six key areas have been recognized with specific recommendations crafted to improve the support and recognition of Supervisors: 1. Clarity of role, 2. Education and Training, 3. Local support, 4. RACS support, 5. Recognition and valuing of the Supervisor role, 6. Risk Management. The purpose of this consensus statement is to clearly articulate supervisor opinions on the support they require to undertake this important role. It has been produced by an independent writing group of experienced surgical supervisors and educators, with support from RACS education department. The consensus statement is a response to a needs assessment of supervisors of surgical training. The statements in this consensus document have been generated from comments and feedback from supervisors that have been refined through process of extensive consultation using a Delphi methodology. We advise specialty training Committees consider these statements and mandate them as part of their accreditation of terms. The role of the supervisor of training requires greater recognition, and incorporation in the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (EBA) in Australia and the ASMS Te Whatu Ora SECA in Aotearoa New Zealand would ensure the provisions in this document are enacted. The six areas identified have transferability to other specialities and countries and are valuable when considering how to support supervisors involved in training our next generation of specialist doctors.

Background: Nutritional risk index (NRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the prognostic value of a combination of the NRI and CEA, namely, the NRI and CEA score (NCS), needs further investigation.

Methods: Stage I-III CRC patients were collected and then divided into three subgroups by counting the NCS: NCS 1: high NRI with normal CEA; NCS 2: high NRI with elevated CEA or low NRI with normal CEA; and NCS 3: low NRI with elevated CEA. The differences in outcome, counted as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were tested among the subgroups.

Results: A total of 285 patients were enrolled, with 108 in NCS 1, 118 in NCS 2 and 59 in NCS 3. Patient features, including age, tumour deposit, T stage, N stage and TNM stage, were significantly different in the NCS subgroups. Both the DFS (log-rank = 26.06, P<0.001) and OS (log-rank = 39.10, P<0.001) were significant in different NCS subgroups, even in maximum tumour diameter ≤4 cm cases (DFS: log-rank = 21.42, P<0.001; OS: log-rank = 30.95, P<0.001), and NCS 1 patients displayed the best outcome compared with the rest of the subgroups. NCS was also found to be an independent risk factor for both DFS and OS.

Conclusions: NCS was a useful prognostic indicator in stages I-III CRC patients.

Background: Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) is managed with thyroid hormone replacement to maintain a euthyroid state. A subset of patients have refractory symptoms, which improve with thyroidectomy (TT). There remains a reluctance to proceed with surgery due to perceptions of complications, and limited data availability regarding improvements in quality of life (QoL). This retrospective case control study aims to analyse the outcomes and QoL scores for symptomatic euthyroid HT patients who underwent TT.

Methods: Thirty euthyroid patients who underwent TT for the management of HT between 2017 and 2022 were identified. An age-matched control group of patients who underwent TT for symptomatic multinodular goitre (MNG) were randomly selected. Demographics, biochemistry, histology, outcomes, and pre- and post-operative SF-36 and ThyPRO-39 scores were compared between groups.

Results: There were no surgical complications in the HT group, whilst two MNG patients had complications. There was a similar rate of parathyroid auto-transplantation in both groups, more glands were transplanted in the HT group. There was a significant difference in pre- and post-operative QoL scores for both groups. Comparison revealed a significant improvement in hyperthyroid symptoms, social life and daily life scores in the HT group. There was a significant difference in pre- and post-operative anti-TPO, anti-TG and TSH levels in the HT group.

Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic Hashimoto's thyroiditis, despite being euthyroid, may benefit from total thyroidectomy however this remains under-utilized. This study demonstrated that thyroidectomy was associated with an improvement in validated post-operative quality of life scores and was not associated with increased complication rates for appropriately selected patients.

Background: Oesophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant therapy has evolved over time as evidence for its survival benefit comes to hand. Clinician reluctance to offer patients neoadjuvant therapy may be based on the perception that patients receiving treatment before surgery may be exposed to a greater risk of perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to examine short-term outcomes in patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy versus up-front surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collated data from 2001 to 2020 of patients undergoing resection for oesophageal cancer. Patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy and up-front surgery were compared for perioperative morbidity (via the Clavien-Dindo classification), length of stay, unplanned readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was performed to predict perioperative morbidity following surgery.

Results: In total, 284 patients underwent an oesophagectomy. Most patients received neoadjuvant treatment (41% received chemoradiotherapy (117/284), 33% received chemotherapy (93/284)), and 26% of patients received up-front surgery (74/284). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or up-front surgery were more likely to have a complication (57%, 67/117 and 57%, 43/74) than patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (38%, 35/93, P = 0.009). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.4% (n = 4) and 2.8% (n = 8), respectively, with no difference between the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusion: In this series, we found that patients who received neoadjuvant treatment could undergo oesophagectomy with curative intent with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality.