首页 > 最新文献

Annals of emergency medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Information for Readers 读者资讯
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(26)00137-x
{"title":"Information for Readers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/s0196-0644(26)00137-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(26)00137-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Among Emergency Department Patients With Unexplained Syncope or Presyncope: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study. 急诊科不明原因晕厥或晕厥前期患者临床结局和资源利用的性别差异:一项前瞻性、观察性、队列研究
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.020
Dana L Sacco,Edward H Suh,Carolyn Winskill,Elaine Y Wan,John DeAngelis,Daniel K Nishijima,Jonathan Schimmel,Alan B Storrow,Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy,Nancy Wood,Robert E Weiss,Marc A Probst
STUDY OBJECTIVEClinical management of emergency department (ED) patients with syncope may differ between women and men. We investigated differences by patient sex in baseline characteristics, physician risk estimation, admission rates, and clinical outcomes in patients with syncope or presyncope.METHODSPatients 40 years or older with syncope or presyncope were enrolled in a prospective, observational study across 6 EDs in the United States. Clinical, demographic, and 30-day outcomes were collected. Treating physicians provided an estimate of 30-day risk of a serious adverse event. We used risk differences and multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between sex and outcomes.RESULTSOf 1,263 patients analyzed, 676 (53.5%) were woman. Men were more likely to have baseline cardiac disease, such as coronary artery disease (27.8% vs 11.8%; risk difference [RD]: 16%; 95% CI 11 to 20) or heart failure (15.3% vs 8.0%; RD: 7.0%; 95% CI 4 to 11). Mean physician estimate of the 30-day serious adverse event risk was 7.2% in men and 6.1% in women (RD: 1.2%; 95% CI -0.26 to 2.6). Men were more often admitted (50.4% vs 39.6%; RD: 11%; 95% CI 5 to 16). The rate of 30-day serious adverse events was higher in men (7.3% vs 4.6%; RD: 2.7%; 95% CI 0.14 to 5.5). After adjustment for baseline clinical variables, no differences in admission rates or clinical outcomes remained.CONCLUSIONThere were significant baseline clinical differences between men and women with syncope or presyncope. We explained the higher admission rates and 30-day serious adverse events among men vs women by differences in baseline clinical factors.
研究目的急诊科(ED)晕厥患者的临床处理在男女之间可能存在差异。我们调查了晕厥或晕厥前期患者在基线特征、医生风险评估、入院率和临床结局方面的性别差异。方法在美国6个急诊科招募40岁及以上的晕厥或晕厥前期患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。收集临床、人口统计学和30天的结果。治疗医生提供了30天内发生严重不良事件的风险估计。我们使用风险差异和多变量逻辑回归来检验性别和结局之间的关系。结果1263例患者中,女性676例(53.5%)。男性更有可能发生基线心脏疾病,如冠状动脉疾病(27.8% vs 11.8%;风险差异[RD]: 16%; 95% CI 11至20)或心力衰竭(15.3% vs 8.0%; RD: 7.0%; 95% CI 4至11)。医生对30天严重不良事件风险的平均估计,男性为7.2%,女性为6.1% (RD: 1.2%; 95% CI -0.26 ~ 2.6)。男性更常入院(50.4% vs 39.6%; RD: 11%; 95% CI 5 ~ 16)。男性30天严重不良事件发生率较高(7.3% vs 4.6%; RD: 2.7%; 95% CI 0.14 ~ 5.5)。在调整基线临床变量后,入院率和临床结果没有差异。结论男性和女性晕厥或晕厥前期的基线临床差异显著。我们通过基线临床因素的差异来解释男性和女性较高的入院率和30天严重不良事件。
{"title":"Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Among Emergency Department Patients With Unexplained Syncope or Presyncope: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study.","authors":"Dana L Sacco,Edward H Suh,Carolyn Winskill,Elaine Y Wan,John DeAngelis,Daniel K Nishijima,Jonathan Schimmel,Alan B Storrow,Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy,Nancy Wood,Robert E Weiss,Marc A Probst","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.020","url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVEClinical management of emergency department (ED) patients with syncope may differ between women and men. We investigated differences by patient sex in baseline characteristics, physician risk estimation, admission rates, and clinical outcomes in patients with syncope or presyncope.METHODSPatients 40 years or older with syncope or presyncope were enrolled in a prospective, observational study across 6 EDs in the United States. Clinical, demographic, and 30-day outcomes were collected. Treating physicians provided an estimate of 30-day risk of a serious adverse event. We used risk differences and multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between sex and outcomes.RESULTSOf 1,263 patients analyzed, 676 (53.5%) were woman. Men were more likely to have baseline cardiac disease, such as coronary artery disease (27.8% vs 11.8%; risk difference [RD]: 16%; 95% CI 11 to 20) or heart failure (15.3% vs 8.0%; RD: 7.0%; 95% CI 4 to 11). Mean physician estimate of the 30-day serious adverse event risk was 7.2% in men and 6.1% in women (RD: 1.2%; 95% CI -0.26 to 2.6). Men were more often admitted (50.4% vs 39.6%; RD: 11%; 95% CI 5 to 16). The rate of 30-day serious adverse events was higher in men (7.3% vs 4.6%; RD: 2.7%; 95% CI 0.14 to 5.5). After adjustment for baseline clinical variables, no differences in admission rates or clinical outcomes remained.CONCLUSIONThere were significant baseline clinical differences between men and women with syncope or presyncope. We explained the higher admission rates and 30-day serious adverse events among men vs women by differences in baseline clinical factors.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency Department Survey of Vaccination Knowledge, Vaccination Coverage, and Willingness to Receive Vaccines in an Emergency Department Among Underserved Populations—Eight U.S. Cities, April-December, 2024 2024年4月至12月,在美国8个城市,对服务不足人群的疫苗接种知识、疫苗接种覆盖率和接受疫苗意愿的急诊科调查
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.009
{"title":"Emergency Department Survey of Vaccination Knowledge, Vaccination Coverage, and Willingness to Receive Vaccines in an Emergency Department Among Underserved Populations—Eight U.S. Cities, April-December, 2024","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Pilot Study to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Driven Early Retrieval of Medical Histories in the Emergency Department. 评估急诊科人工智能驱动的早期病史检索的试点研究
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.022
Alessio Morley-Fletcher,Vidya R Raghavan,Alexandra T Geanacopoulos,Molly Maher,Mark Waltzman,Yuval Barak Corren,Andrew M Fine
STUDY OBJECTIVETo assess the feasibility and acceptability of using ChatGPT to obtain histories of present illnesses directly from patients or caregivers in a pediatric emergency department waiting room in a pilot study.METHODSIn a prospective mixed-methods pilot study, patients (n=31) with Emergency Severity Index scores 3 to 5 used a HIPAA-compliant instance of ChatGPT-4 to generate histories of present illnesses which were collected in parallel with usual care and were not used to inform clinical decision-making. Participants used an 11-point scale to rate their experiences around usability and satisfaction and rated the quality of the generated history of present illness. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses was performed. Pediatric emergency physicians reviewed summaries for accuracy, completeness, efficiency, readability and overall satisfaction, using an 11-point rating scale.RESULTSParticipants reported high usability (median 10, interquartile range 8 to 10), satisfaction (8 and 7 to 10), and overall quality (9 and 8 to 10) of the summary history of present illness. Participants particularly commented on the ease of use, the objectivity of the system, and the accuracy of the summary. Physician reviewers gave favorable ratings across all 5 domains of accuracy, completeness, efficiency, readability, and overall satisfaction, with the highest for readability (9 and 7 to 9), and all others with a median score of 8/10. Clinicians noted that the summaries sometimes lacked important features of prior visits. They noted no hallucinations in the final transcripts.CONCLUSIONThis pilot study of ChatGPT-enabled patient history taking in the pediatric emergency department waiting room was feasible, well accepted, and produced accurate, complete, readable, and efficient summaries. This approach has potential to reduce documentation burden, enhance patient engagement, and support more streamlined triage.
研究目的在一项试点研究中,评估使用ChatGPT直接从儿科急诊科候诊室的患者或护理人员处获取当前病史的可行性和可接受性。方法在一项前瞻性混合方法试点研究中,紧急严重程度指数评分为3至5分的患者(n=31)使用符合hipaa的ChatGPT-4实例生成当前病史,这些病史与常规护理同时收集,不用于临床决策。参与者使用11分制来评估他们的可用性和满意度,并对生成的当前疾病史的质量进行评估。对开放式答复进行了专题分析。儿科急诊医生使用11分制对摘要的准确性、完整性、效率、可读性和总体满意度进行了审查。结果参与者报告了当前疾病总结史的高可用性(中位数为10,四分位数范围为8到10)、满意度(8和7到10)和总体质量(9和8到10)。与会者特别评价了系统的易用性、客观性和摘要的准确性。医师审稿人在准确性、完整性、效率、可读性和总体满意度的所有5个领域都给予了好评,可读性最高(9分和7到9分),其他所有领域的中位数得分为8/10分。临床医生指出,这些摘要有时缺乏先前就诊的重要特征。他们在最后的记录中没有发现任何幻觉。结论在儿科急诊科候诊室使用chatgpt采集患者病史的试点研究是可行的,被广泛接受,并产生了准确、完整、可读和高效的总结。这种方法有可能减轻文件负担,提高患者参与度,并支持更简化的分诊。
{"title":"A Pilot Study to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Driven Early Retrieval of Medical Histories in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Alessio Morley-Fletcher,Vidya R Raghavan,Alexandra T Geanacopoulos,Molly Maher,Mark Waltzman,Yuval Barak Corren,Andrew M Fine","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.022","url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVETo assess the feasibility and acceptability of using ChatGPT to obtain histories of present illnesses directly from patients or caregivers in a pediatric emergency department waiting room in a pilot study.METHODSIn a prospective mixed-methods pilot study, patients (n=31) with Emergency Severity Index scores 3 to 5 used a HIPAA-compliant instance of ChatGPT-4 to generate histories of present illnesses which were collected in parallel with usual care and were not used to inform clinical decision-making. Participants used an 11-point scale to rate their experiences around usability and satisfaction and rated the quality of the generated history of present illness. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses was performed. Pediatric emergency physicians reviewed summaries for accuracy, completeness, efficiency, readability and overall satisfaction, using an 11-point rating scale.RESULTSParticipants reported high usability (median 10, interquartile range 8 to 10), satisfaction (8 and 7 to 10), and overall quality (9 and 8 to 10) of the summary history of present illness. Participants particularly commented on the ease of use, the objectivity of the system, and the accuracy of the summary. Physician reviewers gave favorable ratings across all 5 domains of accuracy, completeness, efficiency, readability, and overall satisfaction, with the highest for readability (9 and 7 to 9), and all others with a median score of 8/10. Clinicians noted that the summaries sometimes lacked important features of prior visits. They noted no hallucinations in the final transcripts.CONCLUSIONThis pilot study of ChatGPT-enabled patient history taking in the pediatric emergency department waiting room was feasible, well accepted, and produced accurate, complete, readable, and efficient summaries. This approach has potential to reduce documentation burden, enhance patient engagement, and support more streamlined triage.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"271 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns of Intramuscular Chemical Sedation Use for Patients Receiving a Mental Health Consultation While in the Emergency Department. 急诊科接受心理健康咨询的患者肌内化学镇静的使用模式
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.021
Suzanne C Lippert,Richie H Xu,Lue-Yen S Tucker,Daniel D DiLena,Adina S Rauchwerger,Juleon Rabbani,Mamata V Kene
STUDY OBJECTIVESDisparities in physical restraint use among emergency department (ED) patients are well described. Less is known about the intramuscular (IM) administration of sedating medications. We evaluated patient characteristics and adverse outcomes associated with receiving IM chemical sedation in the ED.METHODSThis retrospective cross-sectional evaluation at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021, included ED patients aged 18-64 years who received a mental health consultation. We assessed the frequency of IM chemical sedation, associated characteristics, and adverse events. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess characteristics associated with IM chemical sedation.RESULTSOf 94,204 ED visits (56,154 patients) meeting inclusion criteria, 11,048 (11.7%) received IM chemical sedation. Median patient age was 34 years (IQR 25-48), and 46,948 (49.8%) visits were for male patients. Higher adjusted odds of IM chemical sedation were observed for patients of Black race (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.50), concomitant physical restraint (aOR 33.05, 95% CI 30.28 to 36.08), Emergency Medical Services (EMS)/law enforcement arrival (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.60), and involuntary mental health hold placement (aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.77). Patients' age, sex, and need for interpreter services were not associated with IM chemical sedation. Supplemental oxygen administration was the most common adverse event (n = 2,662, 2.8%).CONCLUSIONSAmong ED patients with mental health consultation, IM chemical sedation was associated with EMS/law enforcement arrival, Black race, and involuntary mental health hold. Further work is needed to understand how comorbid mental health conditions, implicit bias, and unmeasured confounders may impact the use of IM chemical sedation.
研究目的:对急诊科(ED)患者使用肢体约束的差异进行了很好的描述。关于肌肉注射镇静药物(IM)的管理知之甚少。我们评估了ED患者接受IM化学镇静相关的患者特征和不良后果。方法:2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日,北加州凯撒医疗机构进行了回顾性横断面评估,纳入了接受心理健康咨询的18-64岁ED患者。我们评估了IM化学镇静的频率、相关特征和不良事件。我们估计调整优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(ci)来评估与IM化学镇静相关的特征。结果在符合纳入标准的94,204例急诊科就诊(56,154例)中,11,048例(11.7%)接受了IM化学镇静。患者年龄中位数为34岁(IQR 25-48),男性患者就诊46,948次(49.8%)。在黑人患者(aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27 ~ 1.50)、伴随的身体约束(aOR 33.05, 95% CI 30.28 ~ 36.08)、紧急医疗服务(EMS)/执法人员到达(aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.43 ~ 1.60)和非自愿精神卫生拘留安置(aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.56 ~ 1.77)中,观察到IM化学镇静的调整后几率较高。患者的年龄、性别和需要翻译服务与IM化学镇静无关。补充供氧是最常见的不良事件(n = 2662, 2.8%)。结论在心理健康咨询的ED患者中,IM化学镇静与EMS/执法人员到达、黑人种族和非自愿心理健康拘留有关。需要进一步的工作来了解共病精神健康状况、隐性偏见和未测量的混杂因素如何影响IM化学镇静的使用。
{"title":"Patterns of Intramuscular Chemical Sedation Use for Patients Receiving a Mental Health Consultation While in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Suzanne C Lippert,Richie H Xu,Lue-Yen S Tucker,Daniel D DiLena,Adina S Rauchwerger,Juleon Rabbani,Mamata V Kene","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.021","url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVESDisparities in physical restraint use among emergency department (ED) patients are well described. Less is known about the intramuscular (IM) administration of sedating medications. We evaluated patient characteristics and adverse outcomes associated with receiving IM chemical sedation in the ED.METHODSThis retrospective cross-sectional evaluation at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021, included ED patients aged 18-64 years who received a mental health consultation. We assessed the frequency of IM chemical sedation, associated characteristics, and adverse events. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess characteristics associated with IM chemical sedation.RESULTSOf 94,204 ED visits (56,154 patients) meeting inclusion criteria, 11,048 (11.7%) received IM chemical sedation. Median patient age was 34 years (IQR 25-48), and 46,948 (49.8%) visits were for male patients. Higher adjusted odds of IM chemical sedation were observed for patients of Black race (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.50), concomitant physical restraint (aOR 33.05, 95% CI 30.28 to 36.08), Emergency Medical Services (EMS)/law enforcement arrival (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.60), and involuntary mental health hold placement (aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.77). Patients' age, sex, and need for interpreter services were not associated with IM chemical sedation. Supplemental oxygen administration was the most common adverse event (n = 2,662, 2.8%).CONCLUSIONSAmong ED patients with mental health consultation, IM chemical sedation was associated with EMS/law enforcement arrival, Black race, and involuntary mental health hold. Further work is needed to understand how comorbid mental health conditions, implicit bias, and unmeasured confounders may impact the use of IM chemical sedation.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can Ambient Charting Fix Emergency Medicine? 环境图表能修复急诊医学吗?
IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.003
David L Schriger, Stephen M Schenkel
{"title":"Can Ambient Charting Fix Emergency Medicine?","authors":"David L Schriger, Stephen M Schenkel","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147430487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telemedicine Use and Outcomes Following Discharge From the Emergency Department, 2020-2022. 急诊部出院后远程医疗的使用和结果,2020-2022。
IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.024
Austin S Kilaru, Angira Mondal, Sophia Jesteen, Zhi Geng, Dane Isenberg, Hashem E Zikry, Zachary F Meisel

Study objective: To describe the use of telemedicine for outpatient follow-up care after discharge from the emergency department (ED) in a large cohort of patients with commercial insurance or Medicare Advantage and determine whether telemedicine follow-up was associated with greater return hospitalizations compared with in-person care.

Methods: Using administrative claims data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from the ED with congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma, from 2020 to 2022. The primary outcome was modality of the first outpatient visit within 14 days, either in person or via telemedicine. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine patient characteristics associated with use of telemedicine compared with in-person follow-up. We also used time-to-event methods to estimate the risk of return hospitalization for patients who obtained telemedicine versus in-person follow-up.

Results: Among 147,561 patients discharged from the ED (mean age 63.9 years; 56.5% women), we found that 4,107 (2.8%) obtained telemedicine follow-up visits and 34,882 (23.6%) obtained in-person follow-up. An additional 7,487 (5.1%) patients were hospitalized prior to obtaining any follow-up. Use of telemedicine varied across conditions and was associated with younger age, female sex, more comorbidities, and ED visit complexity. Telemedicine was not associated with greater risk of return hospitalization compared with in-persnon follow-up.

Conclusion: ED patients used telemedicine for outpatient follow-up visits at low rates, with comparable rates of return hospitalization to those who obtained in-person follow-up. Future studies may examine focused interventions to deploy telemedicine to expand access to follow-up care for selected patients.

研究目的:描述远程医疗在急诊科(ED)出院后门诊随访护理中的使用情况,并确定与现场护理相比,远程医疗随访是否与更高的住院率相关。方法:利用行政索赔数据,我们对2020年至2022年从急诊科出院的患有充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘的成年人进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结果是14天内首次门诊就诊的方式,无论是亲自就诊还是通过远程医疗。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来检查与使用远程医疗相关的患者特征,并与现场随访进行比较。我们还使用时间-事件方法来估计接受远程医疗的患者与现场随访的患者再次住院的风险。结果:147561例急诊科出院患者(平均年龄63.9岁,女性56.5%)中,有4107例(2.8%)接受了远程医疗随访,34882例(23.6%)接受了现场随访。另有7,487例(5.1%)患者在获得任何随访之前住院。远程医疗的使用在不同的情况下有所不同,并且与年轻、女性、更多的合并症和急诊科就诊复杂性有关。与现场随访相比,远程医疗与更大的再次住院风险无关。结论:急诊患者使用远程医疗进行门诊随访的比例较低,回访率与现场随访相当。未来的研究可能会检查集中的干预措施,以部署远程医疗,以扩大对选定患者的随访护理。
{"title":"Telemedicine Use and Outcomes Following Discharge From the Emergency Department, 2020-2022.","authors":"Austin S Kilaru, Angira Mondal, Sophia Jesteen, Zhi Geng, Dane Isenberg, Hashem E Zikry, Zachary F Meisel","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To describe the use of telemedicine for outpatient follow-up care after discharge from the emergency department (ED) in a large cohort of patients with commercial insurance or Medicare Advantage and determine whether telemedicine follow-up was associated with greater return hospitalizations compared with in-person care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using administrative claims data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults discharged from the ED with congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma, from 2020 to 2022. The primary outcome was modality of the first outpatient visit within 14 days, either in person or via telemedicine. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine patient characteristics associated with use of telemedicine compared with in-person follow-up. We also used time-to-event methods to estimate the risk of return hospitalization for patients who obtained telemedicine versus in-person follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 147,561 patients discharged from the ED (mean age 63.9 years; 56.5% women), we found that 4,107 (2.8%) obtained telemedicine follow-up visits and 34,882 (23.6%) obtained in-person follow-up. An additional 7,487 (5.1%) patients were hospitalized prior to obtaining any follow-up. Use of telemedicine varied across conditions and was associated with younger age, female sex, more comorbidities, and ED visit complexity. Telemedicine was not associated with greater risk of return hospitalization compared with in-persnon follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ED patients used telemedicine for outpatient follow-up visits at low rates, with comparable rates of return hospitalization to those who obtained in-person follow-up. Future studies may examine focused interventions to deploy telemedicine to expand access to follow-up care for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147430588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Past-Year Emergency Department Utilization Patterns Among Suicide Decedents: Characterizing At-Risk Patient Populations. 过去一年的急诊科使用模式自杀死者:特征的危险患者群体。
IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.025
Lucas M Neuroth, Danielle Brathwaite, Anna E Waller, Katherine J Harmon

Study objective: Frequent past-year emergency department (ED) use is a risk factor for suicide but also presents an intervention opportunity. This study aimed to quantify ED visit timing among suicide decedents by past-year ED use and characterize differences between suicide decedents and other ED patient populations.

Methods: ED records were obtained from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiological Collection Tool (NC DETECT), and death records were obtained from the NC Violent Death Reporting System (NC-VDRS). ED visits corresponding to the decedent's suicide were probabilistically linked to their corresponding death record. Decedents were classified as frequent (≥4) and infrequent (<4) users based on nonfatal ED visits occurring within one year of their death. Timing from decedents' final nonfatal visit to death was assessed. Decedents' demographics and visit characteristics were compared with all ED patients and mental health patients, stratified by past-year use.

Results: From 2019 to 2020, 670 of 2,883 NC-VDRS suicide decedents linked to an ED visit associated with their suicide. One third (n=213) of linked decedents had past-year ED use. Among these individuals, 21.6% (n=46) were frequent users. Within 30 days of their final nonfatal visit, only 28% of frequent users survived, compared with 65% of infrequent users (difference: -36.4% [-51.3% to -21.5%]). Suicide decedents with frequent use were distinct from infrequent users and from both reference groups regarding demographic and visit-level characteristics.

Conclusion: Suicide decedents who visited the ED once or who were frequent users were demographically distinct from the overall population of ED patients. Timing from final nonfatal ED visit to death by suicide varied with past-year use.

研究目的:过去一年频繁使用急诊科(ED)是自杀的危险因素,但也提供了干预机会。本研究旨在通过过去一年的ED使用来量化自杀死者的ED就诊时间,并表征自杀死者与其他ED患者群体之间的差异。方法:从北卡罗莱纳州疾病事件追踪与流行病学收集工具(NC DETECT)中获取ED记录,从北卡罗莱纳州暴力死亡报告系统(NC- vdrs)中获取死亡记录。与死者自杀相对应的急诊科就诊很可能与他们相应的死亡记录相关联。死者被分为频繁(≥4次)和不频繁(结果:从2019年到2020年,2,883名NC-VDRS自杀死者中,有670人与ED就诊有关。三分之一(n=213)的相关死者在过去一年中使用过ED。在这些个体中,21.6% (n=46)是频繁使用者。在他们最后一次非致命访问的30天内,只有28%的频繁用户存活,而不频繁用户的存活率为65%(差异:-36.4%[-51.3%至-21.5%])。在人口统计和访问水平特征方面,经常使用的自杀者与不经常使用的自杀者不同。结论:在人口统计学上,曾到过一次急诊科或频繁使用急诊科的自杀者与急诊科患者的总体人群不同。从最后一次非致命性急诊科就诊到自杀死亡的时间随着使用时间的不同而不同。
{"title":"Past-Year Emergency Department Utilization Patterns Among Suicide Decedents: Characterizing At-Risk Patient Populations.","authors":"Lucas M Neuroth, Danielle Brathwaite, Anna E Waller, Katherine J Harmon","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Frequent past-year emergency department (ED) use is a risk factor for suicide but also presents an intervention opportunity. This study aimed to quantify ED visit timing among suicide decedents by past-year ED use and characterize differences between suicide decedents and other ED patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ED records were obtained from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiological Collection Tool (NC DETECT), and death records were obtained from the NC Violent Death Reporting System (NC-VDRS). ED visits corresponding to the decedent's suicide were probabilistically linked to their corresponding death record. Decedents were classified as frequent (≥4) and infrequent (<4) users based on nonfatal ED visits occurring within one year of their death. Timing from decedents' final nonfatal visit to death was assessed. Decedents' demographics and visit characteristics were compared with all ED patients and mental health patients, stratified by past-year use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2019 to 2020, 670 of 2,883 NC-VDRS suicide decedents linked to an ED visit associated with their suicide. One third (n=213) of linked decedents had past-year ED use. Among these individuals, 21.6% (n=46) were frequent users. Within 30 days of their final nonfatal visit, only 28% of frequent users survived, compared with 65% of infrequent users (difference: -36.4% [-51.3% to -21.5%]). Suicide decedents with frequent use were distinct from infrequent users and from both reference groups regarding demographic and visit-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suicide decedents who visited the ED once or who were frequent users were demographically distinct from the overall population of ED patients. Timing from final nonfatal ED visit to death by suicide varied with past-year use.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147430570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Did Rural Emergency Hospital Converters Avoid Closure? 农村急救医院转型避免了倒闭吗?
IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.004
Emma Kerr, Tyler L Malone, Kristie Thompson, George H Pink, George M Holmes
{"title":"Did Rural Emergency Hospital Converters Avoid Closure?","authors":"Emma Kerr, Tyler L Malone, Kristie Thompson, George H Pink, George M Holmes","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147430554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act Continuous Medicaid Coverage Policy on Emergency Department Visits. 《家庭第一冠状病毒应对法案》持续医疗补助覆盖政策对急诊室就诊的影响
IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.018
Amundam Mancho,Heather E Hsu,Paul Shafer,Alison Galbraith
{"title":"The Impact of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act Continuous Medicaid Coverage Policy on Emergency Department Visits.","authors":"Amundam Mancho,Heather E Hsu,Paul Shafer,Alison Galbraith","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.01.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147350375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1