首页 > 最新文献

Angiology最新文献

英文 中文
Relationship Between Coronary Artery Revascularization and Postoperative Delirium: Progress and Perspectives. 冠状动脉血运重建与术后谵妄的关系:进展与展望。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241252467
Nan Lu, Yunpeng Chi, Meiyan Liu

Brain dysfunction resulting from damage to the heart-brain link leads to a decline in cognitive function. This, in turn, gives rise to the clinical symptom of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. Those affected are provided symptomatic treatment, but many do not recover fully. Thus, medium- and long-term mortality and adverse event rates remain relatively high in patients with perioperative delirium. Despite the relatively high incidence of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, it has not been systematically investigated. Inflammation, vascular damage, neuronal damage, and embolism are all involved in the injury process. Here, we discuss the incidence rate, pathological mechanisms, and prognosis of delirium after coronary artery revascularization. We also discuss in detail the risk factors for delirium after coronary artery revascularization, such as anxiety, depression, mode of operation, and drug use. We hope that prevention, early diagnosis, assessment, and potential treatment can be achieved by cardiologists to improve patient prognosis.

心脑联系受损导致脑功能障碍,从而导致认知功能下降。这反过来又导致接受冠状动脉血运重建手术的患者出现围手术期谵妄的临床症状。受影响的患者会得到对症治疗,但许多人并不能完全康复。因此,围手术期谵妄患者的中长期死亡率和不良事件发生率仍然相对较高。尽管冠状动脉血运重建术患者围术期谵妄的发生率相对较高,但尚未对其进行系统研究。炎症、血管损伤、神经元损伤和栓塞都参与了损伤过程。在此,我们将讨论冠状动脉血运重建术后谵妄的发生率、病理机制和预后。我们还详细讨论了冠状动脉血运重建术后谵妄的危险因素,如焦虑、抑郁、手术方式和药物使用等。我们希望心脏病学专家能够做到预防、早期诊断、评估和潜在治疗,以改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Relationship Between Coronary Artery Revascularization and Postoperative Delirium: Progress and Perspectives.","authors":"Nan Lu, Yunpeng Chi, Meiyan Liu","doi":"10.1177/00033197241252467","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241252467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain dysfunction resulting from damage to the heart-brain link leads to a decline in cognitive function. This, in turn, gives rise to the clinical symptom of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. Those affected are provided symptomatic treatment, but many do not recover fully. Thus, medium- and long-term mortality and adverse event rates remain relatively high in patients with perioperative delirium. Despite the relatively high incidence of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, it has not been systematically investigated. Inflammation, vascular damage, neuronal damage, and embolism are all involved in the injury process. Here, we discuss the incidence rate, pathological mechanisms, and prognosis of delirium after coronary artery revascularization. We also discuss in detail the risk factors for delirium after coronary artery revascularization, such as anxiety, depression, mode of operation, and drug use. We hope that prevention, early diagnosis, assessment, and potential treatment can be achieved by cardiologists to improve patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140850579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACEF vs PARIS score in Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the START ANTIPLATELET Registry. ACEF 与 PARIS 评分在预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者心血管事件中的对比:START ANTIPLATELET 登记的启示。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241278923
Plinio Cirillo, Luigi Di Serafino, Maria Scalamogna, Gennaro De Rosa, Paolo Calabrò, Emilia Antonucci, Paolo Gresele, Gualtiero Palareti, Giuseppe Patti, Vittorio Pengo, Pasquale Pignatelli, Rossella Marcucci

Several scores can predict clinical outcomes of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). The validated PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimen in Stented Patients) score is poorly used in clinical practice because it needs items that are not always easily available. The ACEF (Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction) score is more attractive because it only includes three items. We compared these scores to risk-stratify ACS patients enrolled into the START (Survey on anticoagulated pAtients RegisTer)-ANTIPLATELET registry. ACS patients who completed 1-year follow-up (n = 1171) were grouped in tertiles (low, medium, and high-risk) according to their ACEF/PARIS scores. Primary endpoints were: one-year MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or target vessel revascularization) and NACE (net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events): MACCE plus major bleeding). MACCE incidence was higher in the high-risk tertile (15%) VS low/medium (3/7 %) risk tertiles (P < .001). NACE incidence in the high-risk tertile was 24% VS low/medium (9/15 %) risk tertiles (P < .001), independently of the risk score used. The ACEF score has similar accuracy as the validated PARIS score for the estimation of ischemic/bleeding risk. Thereby, we strongly suggest its use in clinical practice to risk-stratify ACS patients and select optimal therapeutic strategies.

有几种评分方法可以预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的临床预后。经过验证的 PARIS(支架置入患者抗血小板治疗不依从模式)评分在临床实践中的应用并不理想,因为它需要的项目并不总是那么容易获得。ACEF(年龄、肌酐和射血分数)评分更有吸引力,因为它只包括三个项目。我们对这些评分进行了比较,以便对 START(抗凝血患者调查)-ANTIPLATELET 登记的 ACS 患者进行风险分级。根据 ACEF/PARIS 评分,将完成 1 年随访的 ACS 患者(n = 1171)分为三组(低、中、高风险)。主要终点是:一年的 MACCE(主要不良心脑血管事件:死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、中风或靶血管再通术)和 NACE(净不良心脑血管事件):MACCE加上大出血)。高风险三等分组(15%)与低/中风险三等分组(3/7 %)相比,MACCE发生率更高(P < .001)。高风险三等分组的 NACE 发生率为 24%,而低/中风险三等分组为 9/15 %(P < .001),与所使用的风险评分无关。在估计缺血/出血风险方面,ACEF 评分与经过验证的 PARIS 评分具有相似的准确性。因此,我们强烈建议在临床实践中使用它来对 ACS 患者进行风险分层并选择最佳治疗策略。
{"title":"ACEF vs PARIS score in Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the START ANTIPLATELET Registry.","authors":"Plinio Cirillo, Luigi Di Serafino, Maria Scalamogna, Gennaro De Rosa, Paolo Calabrò, Emilia Antonucci, Paolo Gresele, Gualtiero Palareti, Giuseppe Patti, Vittorio Pengo, Pasquale Pignatelli, Rossella Marcucci","doi":"10.1177/00033197241278923","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241278923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several scores can predict clinical outcomes of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). The validated PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimen in Stented Patients) score is poorly used in clinical practice because it needs items that are not always easily available. The ACEF (Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction) score is more attractive because it only includes three items. We compared these scores to risk-stratify ACS patients enrolled into the START (Survey on anticoagulated pAtients RegisTer)-ANTIPLATELET registry. ACS patients who completed 1-year follow-up (<i>n</i> = 1171) were grouped in tertiles (low, medium, and high-risk) according to their ACEF/PARIS scores. Primary endpoints were: one-year MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or target vessel revascularization) and NACE (net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events): MACCE plus major bleeding). MACCE incidence was higher in the high-risk tertile (15%) VS low/medium (3/7 %) risk tertiles (<i>P</i> < .001). NACE incidence in the high-risk tertile was 24% VS low/medium (9/15 %) risk tertiles (<i>P</i> < .001), independently of the risk score used<b>.</b> The ACEF score has similar accuracy as the validated PARIS score for the estimation of ischemic/bleeding risk. Thereby, we strongly suggest its use in clinical practice to risk-stratify ACS patients and select optimal therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Inflammatory Markers and Coronary Collateral Circulation. 信:炎症标志物与冠状动脉侧支循环
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241267349
Aykut Demirkıran, Cihan Aydın, Mesut Engin
{"title":"Letter: Inflammatory Markers and Coronary Collateral Circulation.","authors":"Aykut Demirkıran, Cihan Aydın, Mesut Engin","doi":"10.1177/00033197241267349","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241267349","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Is Distal Transradial Approach Superior? 信经桡动脉远端入路是否更优越?
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241256686
Can Özkan
{"title":"Letter: Is Distal Transradial Approach Superior?","authors":"Can Özkan","doi":"10.1177/00033197241256686","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241256686","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141157143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes and Predictors of Inpatient Mortality for Marantic Endocarditis Complicating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Contemporary Nationwide Study From the United States. 系统性红斑狼疮并发马氏心内膜炎住院患者死亡率的结果和预测因素:美国当代全国性研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241288666
Krishna Sanaka, Joanne Mathew, Asef Raiyan Hoque, Bo Xu

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are susceptible to marantic endocarditis (ME) due to a hypercoagulable state. The literature regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of ME in SLE patients is limited. All patients ≥18 years who had SLE with and without ME between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample in the United States (US). Predictors of inpatient mortality for SLE patients with ME were analyzed. Between 2007 and 2019, there were 508,818 hospitalizations for SLE, of which 785 (0.2%) had ME. Of SLE patients with ME, 33 (4.2%) died while hospitalized over the study period. On multivariate analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence intervals: 24.72 (3.21, 190.27)), age <34 years (aOR: 6.81 (1.80, 25.79)), anemia (aOR: 3.41 (1.12, 10.40)), antiphospholipid syndrome (aOR: 13.50 (3.83, 47.64)), stroke complicating ME (aOR: 9.64 (3.24, 28.71)), and acute kidney injury (aOR: 3.74 (1.06, 13.20)) were all associated with increased inpatient mortality among SLE patients with ME (P < .05 for all). Between 2007 to 2019, ME occurred in 0.2% of SLE hospitalizations, with a 4.2% average inpatient mortality over the study period. Female sex, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke were most strongly associated with increased inpatient mortality.

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者由于处于高凝状态,很容易患上马氏心内膜炎(ME)。有关系统性红斑狼疮患者ME的流行病学和预后的文献十分有限。研究人员从美国全国住院病人样本中找出了2007年至2019年期间所有≥18岁患有系统性红斑狼疮并伴有或不伴有ME的患者。分析了伴有 ME 的系统性红斑狼疮患者的住院死亡率预测因素。2007 年至 2019 年间,共有 508818 例系统性红斑狼疮住院患者,其中 785 例(0.2%)患有 ME。在患有 ME 的系统性红斑狼疮患者中,有 33 人(4.2%)在研究期间住院期间死亡。经多变量分析,女性性别(调整后的几率比(aOR),95% 置信区间:24.72 (3.21, 190.27))、年龄 P < .05(均为 P < .05)。2007年至2019年期间,0.2%的系统性红斑狼疮住院患者发生了ME,研究期间平均住院患者死亡率为4.2%。女性、抗磷脂综合征和中风与住院患者死亡率增加的关系最为密切。
{"title":"Outcomes and Predictors of Inpatient Mortality for Marantic Endocarditis Complicating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Contemporary Nationwide Study From the United States.","authors":"Krishna Sanaka, Joanne Mathew, Asef Raiyan Hoque, Bo Xu","doi":"10.1177/00033197241288666","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241288666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are susceptible to marantic endocarditis (ME) due to a hypercoagulable state. The literature regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of ME in SLE patients is limited. All patients ≥18 years who had SLE with and without ME between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample in the United States (US). Predictors of inpatient mortality for SLE patients with ME were analyzed. Between 2007 and 2019, there were 508,818 hospitalizations for SLE, of which 785 (0.2%) had ME. Of SLE patients with ME, 33 (4.2%) died while hospitalized over the study period. On multivariate analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence intervals: 24.72 (3.21, 190.27)), age <34 years (aOR: 6.81 (1.80, 25.79)), anemia (aOR: 3.41 (1.12, 10.40)), antiphospholipid syndrome (aOR: 13.50 (3.83, 47.64)), stroke complicating ME (aOR: 9.64 (3.24, 28.71)), and acute kidney injury (aOR: 3.74 (1.06, 13.20)) were all associated with increased inpatient mortality among SLE patients with ME (<i>P</i> < .05 for all). Between 2007 to 2019, ME occurred in 0.2% of SLE hospitalizations, with a 4.2% average inpatient mortality over the study period. Female sex, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke were most strongly associated with increased inpatient mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"90-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142340066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Importance of Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) in Predicting Coronary Collateral Circulation in Stable Coronary Artery Patients. 泛免疫炎症值 (PIV) 在预测稳定型冠状动脉患者冠状动脉侧支循环中的重要性。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241258529
Yucel Yilmaz, Saban Kelesoglu

In this study, the correlation between pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and coronary collateral circulation (CCC) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) was analyzed. The study included 663 patients with CCS who underwent coronary angiography and had coronary stenosis of ≥95% in at least one major coronary vessel. The participants were divided into two groups: good CCC (Rentrop score 2-3) and poor CCC (Rentrop score 0-1). PIV score was calculated as monocyte x platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte count. When the patient groups who developed good and poor CCC were compared, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < .001), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) (P < .001), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (P < .001), and PIV (P < .001) were higher in patients with poor CCC. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, SII, NLR, CRP, CAR, and PIV were found to be independent predictors of poor CCC (P < .001, for all). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that a cut-off value of 442.2 for PIV predicted poor CCC slightly better compared to other markers, with 76.8% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity (area under ROC curve = 0.808 (95% CI: 0.764-0.851), P < .001). These findings suggest that PIV can be used as an independent predictor of CCC development.

本研究分析了慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者的泛免疫炎症值(PIV)与冠状动脉侧支循环(CCC)之间的相关性。研究纳入了 663 名接受冠状动脉造影术的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者,这些患者至少有一条主要冠状动脉血管的冠状动脉狭窄≥95%。参与者被分为两组:良好 CCC(Rentrop 评分 2-3)和不良 CCC(Rentrop 评分 0-1)。PIV 评分按单核细胞 x 血小板 x 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞计数计算。将发生良好和不良CCC的患者组进行比较,不良CCC患者的中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(P < .001)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平、CRP/白蛋白比值(CAR)(P < .001)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)(P < .001)和PIV(P < .001)均较高。在多变量逻辑回归分析中发现,年龄、SII、NLR、CRP、CAR 和 PIV 是不良 CCC 的独立预测因子(P < .001)。接收者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,与其他标志物相比,PIV 的临界值 442.2 预测不良 CCC 的效果稍好,敏感性为 76.8%,特异性为 70.1%(ROC 曲线下面积 = 0.808 (95% CI: 0.764-0.851), P < .001)。这些研究结果表明,PIV 可作为 CCC 发展的独立预测指标。
{"title":"The Importance of Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) in Predicting Coronary Collateral Circulation in Stable Coronary Artery Patients.","authors":"Yucel Yilmaz, Saban Kelesoglu","doi":"10.1177/00033197241258529","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241258529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, the correlation between pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and coronary collateral circulation (CCC) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) was analyzed. The study included 663 patients with CCS who underwent coronary angiography and had coronary stenosis of ≥95% in at least one major coronary vessel. The participants were divided into two groups: good CCC (Rentrop score 2-3) and poor CCC (Rentrop score 0-1). PIV score was calculated as monocyte x platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte count. When the patient groups who developed good and poor CCC were compared, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (<i>P</i> < .001), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) (<i>P</i> < .001), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (<i>P</i> < .001), and PIV (<i>P</i> < .001) were higher in patients with poor CCC. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, SII, NLR, CRP, CAR, and PIV were found to be independent predictors of poor CCC (<i>P</i> < .001, for all). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that a cut-off value of 442.2 for PIV predicted poor CCC slightly better compared to other markers, with 76.8% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity (area under ROC curve = 0.808 (95% CI: 0.764-0.851), <i>P</i> < .001). These findings suggest that PIV can be used as an independent predictor of CCC development.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141185982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia? What do BASIL-2 and BEST-CLI Tell Us. 对慢性肢体危重缺血患者进行手术还是血管内治疗?BASIL-2 和 BEST-CLI 告诉我们什么?
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241233421
Kosmas I Paraskevas, Frank J Veith
{"title":"Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia? What do BASIL-2 and BEST-CLI Tell Us.","authors":"Kosmas I Paraskevas, Frank J Veith","doi":"10.1177/00033197241233421","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241233421","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139711376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases. 冠状动脉袢在 STEMI 结果中不断演变的作用:大流行阶段和大流行后阶段的比较分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241288662
Ozgur Ulas Ozcan, Muhammed Bora Demircelik, Aykun Hakgor, Atakan Dursun, Arzu Yazar, Aysel Akhundova, Beytullah Cakal, Oguz Karaca, Bilal Boztosun

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, P = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, P = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, P = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, P = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, P = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.

急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是一种危重病症,冠状动脉袢可减轻心肌损伤。2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给 STEMI 的治疗带来了独特的挑战,可能会影响治疗效果。本研究评估了大流行期间与大流行后冠状动脉搭桥的疗效。研究回顾了 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家大容量三级医疗中心接受治疗的 1465 名 STEMI 患者。采用伦特洛普分类法对袢血进行评估。根据侧支状态和时间框架分析了院内死亡率和 1 年主要心脏不良事件 (MACE)。大流行期间,稳健侧支的发生率较高(28.2% vs 23.2%,P = .04),但其保护作用较弱,各组的院内死亡率(14.4% vs 8.1%,P = .07)和 1 年 MACE 发生率(21.9% vs 30.4%,P = .09)相似。大流行后,稳健的副脉显示出显著的保护作用,降低了院内死亡率(3.6% vs 7.4%,P = .04)和 1 年 MACE 发生率(17.1% vs 24.9%,P = .03)。这些研究结果突显了瓣膜在 STEMI 治疗中的动态作用,大流行损害了瓣膜的功能。这强调了对 STEMI 治疗策略进行调整的必要性,尤其是在全球健康危机期间。
{"title":"Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases.","authors":"Ozgur Ulas Ozcan, Muhammed Bora Demircelik, Aykun Hakgor, Atakan Dursun, Arzu Yazar, Aysel Akhundova, Beytullah Cakal, Oguz Karaca, Bilal Boztosun","doi":"10.1177/00033197241288662","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241288662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, <i>P</i> = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, <i>P</i> = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, <i>P</i> = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, <i>P</i> = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, <i>P</i> = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Non-Dipping in COVID-19: Known Pathways, New Context. 信函:COVID-19的非浸渍:已知途径,新背景。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1177/00033197251370084
Ramazan Astan
{"title":"Letter: Non-Dipping in COVID-19: Known Pathways, New Context.","authors":"Ramazan Astan","doi":"10.1177/00033197251370084","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197251370084","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive Ability of Inflammatory Markers on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Admitted to Coronary Care Unit (MORCOR-TURK INFLAME). 炎症标志物对冠心病监护病房住院患者预后的预测能力(MORCOR-TURK INFLAME)。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241273389
Ömer Kümet, Mehmet Özgeyik, Şahin Topuz, Mustafa Beğenç Taşcanov, Ferhat Dindaş, İrfan Şahin, İbrahim Ersoy, İbrahim Halil Tanboğa

We investigated the prognostic implications of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and triglyceride/glucose index (TGI) in the MORtality predictors in the CORonary Care Units in TURKey (MORCOR-TURK) population. This is the largest registry of coronary care unit (CCU) patients in Turkey (3157 patients admitted to CCU in 50 different centers). The study population was divided into two according to in-hospital survival status; 137 patients (4.3%) died in-hospital follow-up. A significant correlation was found between death and SII, CAR, NLR, and PNI but not for AIP and TGI in logistic regression. In Model 1 (combining parameters proven to be risk predictors), the -2 log-likelihood ratio was 888.439, Nagelkerke R2 was 0.235, and AUC (area under curve) was 0.814 (95% CI: 0.771-0.858). All other models were constructed by adding each inflammatory marker separately to Model 1. Only Model 3 (CAR + Model 1) had a significantly greater AUC than Model 1 (DeLong P = .01). Our study showed that CAR, but not other inflammatory index, is a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality in CCU patients when added to proven risk predictors.

我们研究了全身免疫炎症指数 (SII)、血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数 (AIP)、C 反应蛋白/白蛋白比值 (CAR)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 (NLR)、预后营养指数 (PNI) 和甘油三酯/葡萄糖指数 (TGI) 对土耳其冠心病监护病房 (MORCOR-TURK) 患者死亡率预测的预后影响。这是土耳其最大的冠心病监护病房(CCU)患者登记机构(50 个不同中心的 CCU 共收治 3157 名患者)。研究对象根据院内生存状况分为两组,137 名患者(4.3%)在院内随访时死亡。在逻辑回归中发现,死亡与 SII、CAR、NLR 和 PNI 有明显相关性,但与 AIP 和 TGI 无关。在模型 1(将已被证实为风险预测因子的参数合并)中,-2 log-likelihood ratio 为 888.439,Nagelkerke R2 为 0.235,AUC(曲线下面积)为 0.814(95% CI:0.771-0.858)。所有其他模型都是将每种炎症标记物分别加入模型 1 而构建的。只有模型 3(CAR + 模型 1)的 AUC 明显大于模型 1(DeLong P = .01)。我们的研究表明,如果将 CAR(而非其他炎症指标)添加到已证实的风险预测因子中,CAR 可显著预测 CCU 患者的院内死亡率。
{"title":"Predictive Ability of Inflammatory Markers on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Admitted to Coronary Care Unit (MORCOR-TURK INFLAME).","authors":"Ömer Kümet, Mehmet Özgeyik, Şahin Topuz, Mustafa Beğenç Taşcanov, Ferhat Dindaş, İrfan Şahin, İbrahim Ersoy, İbrahim Halil Tanboğa","doi":"10.1177/00033197241273389","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00033197241273389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the prognostic implications of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and triglyceride/glucose index (TGI) in the MORtality predictors in the CORonary Care Units in TURKey (MORCOR-TURK) population. This is the largest registry of coronary care unit (CCU) patients in Turkey (3157 patients admitted to CCU in 50 different centers). The study population was divided into two according to in-hospital survival status; 137 patients (4.3%) died in-hospital follow-up. A significant correlation was found between death and SII, CAR, NLR, and PNI but not for AIP and TGI in logistic regression. In Model 1 (combining parameters proven to be risk predictors), the -2 log-likelihood ratio was 888.439, Nagelkerke R<sup>2</sup> was 0.235, and AUC (area under curve) was 0.814 (95% CI: 0.771-0.858). All other models were constructed by adding each inflammatory marker separately to Model 1. Only Model 3 (CAR + Model 1) had a significantly greater AUC than Model 1 (DeLong <i>P</i> = .01). Our study showed that CAR, but not other inflammatory index, is a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality in CCU patients when added to proven risk predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141970479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Angiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1