首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Image of the month-quiz case. 本月图片--测验案例。
Pub Date : 2012-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1505a
Peter J Kneuertz, Midhun Malla, David P Cosgrove, Joseph M Herman, Ihab R Kamel, Jean-Francois H Geschwind, Andrew M Cameron, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Image of the month-quiz case.","authors":"Peter J Kneuertz, Midhun Malla, David P Cosgrove, Joseph M Herman, Ihab R Kamel, Jean-Francois H Geschwind, Andrew M Cameron, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2011.1505a","DOIUrl":"10.1001/archsurg.2011.1505a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 10","pages":"973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32399379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
About this journal. 关于这本日记。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.147.9.792
{"title":"About this journal.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.147.9.792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.147.9.792","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.147.9.792","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31588899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of resident involvement on trauma care outcomes. 住院医师介入对创伤护理结果的影响。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672
Marko Bukur, Matthew B Singer, Rex Chung, Eric J Ley, Darren J Malinoski, Daniel R Margulies, Ali Salim

Hypothesis: Discrepancies exist in complications and outcomes at teaching trauma centers (TTCs) vs nonteaching TCs (NTCs).

Design: Retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank research data sets (January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2008).

Setting: Level II TCs.

Patients: Patients at TTCs were compared with patients at NTCs using demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Regression modeling was used to adjust for confounding factors to determine the effect of house staff presence on failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an in-house complication.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were major complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.

Results: In total, 162 687 patients were available for analysis, 36 713 of whom (22.6%) were admitted to NTCs. Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs were older (52.8 vs 50.7 years), had more severe head injuries (8.3% vs 7.8%), and were more likely to undergo immediate operation (15.0% vs 13.2%) or ICU admission (28.1% vs 22.8%) (P < .01 for all). The mean Injury Severity Scores were similar between the groups (10.1 for patients admitted to NTCs vs 10.4 for patients admitted to TTCs, P < .01). Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs experienced fewer complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; P < .01), had a lower adjusted mortality rate (aOR, 0.87; P = .01), and were less likely to experience failure to rescue (aOR, 0.81; P = .01).

Conclusions: Admission to level II TTCs is associated with an increased risk for major complications and a higher rate of failure to rescue compared with admission to level II NTCs. Further investigation of the differences in care provided by level II TTCs vs NTCs may identify areas for improvement in residency training and processes of care.

假设:教学创伤中心(TTCs)与非教学创伤中心(ntc)在并发症和预后方面存在差异。设计:回顾性回顾国家创伤数据库研究数据集(2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日)。设置:II级tc。患者:使用人口统计学、临床和结局数据将TTCs的患者与ntc的患者进行比较。回归模型用于调整混杂因素,以确定医护人员在场对抢救失败的影响,抢救失败定义为院内并发症后的死亡率。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为主要并发症、住院死亡率和抢救失败。结果:共有16687例患者可用于分析,其中36713例(22.6%)为ntc患者。与入住TTCs的患者相比,入住ntc的患者年龄更大(52.8岁vs 50.7岁),头部损伤更严重(8.3% vs 7.8%),更容易立即手术(15.0% vs 13.2%)或入住ICU (28.1% vs 22.8%)(均P < 0.01)。两组间的平均损伤严重程度评分相似(ntc患者为10.1分,TTCs患者为10.4分,P < 0.01)。与接受TTCs的患者相比,接受ntc的患者并发症较少(调整优势比[aOR], 0.63;P < 0.01),校正死亡率较低(aOR, 0.87;P = 0.01),且较不容易出现抢救失败(aOR, 0.81;P = 0.01)。结论:与入住II级ntc相比,入住II级TTCs与主要并发症的风险增加和更高的抢救失败率相关。对二级TTCs与ntc提供的护理差异的进一步调查可能会确定住院医师培训和护理过程中需要改进的领域。
{"title":"Influence of resident involvement on trauma care outcomes.","authors":"Marko Bukur,&nbsp;Matthew B Singer,&nbsp;Rex Chung,&nbsp;Eric J Ley,&nbsp;Darren J Malinoski,&nbsp;Daniel R Margulies,&nbsp;Ali Salim","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Discrepancies exist in complications and outcomes at teaching trauma centers (TTCs) vs nonteaching TCs (NTCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank research data sets (January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2008).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level II TCs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients at TTCs were compared with patients at NTCs using demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Regression modeling was used to adjust for confounding factors to determine the effect of house staff presence on failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an in-house complication.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were major complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 687 patients were available for analysis, 36 713 of whom (22.6%) were admitted to NTCs. Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs were older (52.8 vs 50.7 years), had more severe head injuries (8.3% vs 7.8%), and were more likely to undergo immediate operation (15.0% vs 13.2%) or ICU admission (28.1% vs 22.8%) (P < .01 for all). The mean Injury Severity Scores were similar between the groups (10.1 for patients admitted to NTCs vs 10.4 for patients admitted to TTCs, P < .01). Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs experienced fewer complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; P < .01), had a lower adjusted mortality rate (aOR, 0.87; P = .01), and were less likely to experience failure to rescue (aOR, 0.81; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission to level II TTCs is associated with an increased risk for major complications and a higher rate of failure to rescue compared with admission to level II NTCs. Further investigation of the differences in care provided by level II TTCs vs NTCs may identify areas for improvement in residency training and processes of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"856-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30913665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Failure to rescue from residents? 从居民手中营救失败?
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1802
Matthew J Martin
{"title":"Failure to rescue from residents?","authors":"Matthew J Martin","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1802","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"862-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1802","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30913666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging: a solution looking for a problem: comment on "selective preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in women with breast cancer"a solution looking for a problem. 术前乳房磁共振成像:寻找问题的解决方案:评论“选择性术前乳腺癌女性磁共振成像”寻找问题的解决方案。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1679
Sharon S Lum
{"title":"Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging: a solution looking for a problem: comment on \"selective preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in women with breast cancer\"a solution looking for a problem.","authors":"Sharon S Lum","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1679","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"839-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1679","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30912639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Outcomes of open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease after failed endovascular therapy. 动脉髂闭塞性疾病血管内治疗失败后开放性手术的疗效分析。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1649
Rachel C Danczyk, Erica L Mitchell, Bryan D Petersen, James Edwards, Timothy K Liem, Gregory J Landry, Gregory L Moneta

Objectives: To compare patient outcomes of primary open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with those of secondary open operations for failed endovascular therapy (ET) of AIOD.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes.

Setting: Affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital from January 1, 1998, through March 31, 2010.

Patients: Patients who underwent primary open operation for AIOD or secondary open operation for failed ET of AIOD.

Main outcome measures: Overall survival and limb salvage.

Results: Primary open operations (n = 153) were 67 aortobifemoral grafts (43.8%), 38 axillobifemoral grafts (24.8%), and 48 femoral-femoral grafts (31.4%). Secondary open operations (n = 35) were 28 aortobifemoral grafts (80.0%), 5 axillobifemoral grafts (14.3%), and 2 femoral-femoral grafts (5.7%). Mean (SD) 5-year survival was 48.2% (5.6%) and 66.8% (10.0%), respectively, for patients undergoing primary vs secondary open surgery for AIOD (P = .01). There were 7 amputations during a mean follow-up of 3 years, all in the primary open surgery group.

Conclusions: Despite a higher proportion of coronary artery disease and a 20% conversion of claudication to critical limb ischemia after failed ET for AIOD, survival was longer in patients undergoing secondary vs primary open surgery. Patients who underwent open surgery after failed ET for AIOD did not require amputation. Failed ET for AIOD does not lead to worse outcomes for patients undergoing open surgery for AIOD.

目的:比较主动脉髂闭塞性疾病(AIOD)的首次开放手术与血管内治疗(ET)失败的二次开放手术的疗效。设计:进行回顾性队列研究,分析人口统计学特征、合并症和结果。单位:1998年1月1日至2010年3月31日在附属退伍军人事务医院工作。患者:接受AIOD首次开放手术或AIOD ET失败二次开放手术的患者。主要观察指标:总生存率和肢体保留率。结果:首次开放性手术153例,主动脉股动脉移植67例(43.8%),腋窝股动脉移植38例(24.8%),股股动脉移植48例(31.4%)。二次开放性手术(35例)28例为主动脉股动脉移植(80.0%),5例为腋窝股动脉移植(14.3%),2例为股动脉-股动脉移植(5.7%)。接受原发性和继发性AIOD开放手术的患者的平均5年生存率分别为48.2%(5.6%)和66.8% (10.0%)(P = 0.01)。在平均3年的随访中,有7例截肢,均为首次开放手术组。结论:尽管AIOD ET治疗失败后发生冠状动脉疾病的比例更高,20%的跛行转化为严重肢体缺血,但接受二次开放手术的患者比初次开放手术的患者生存时间更长。在AIOD ET失败后接受开放手术的患者不需要截肢。AIOD的ET失败并不会导致接受AIOD开放手术的患者预后更差。
{"title":"Outcomes of open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease after failed endovascular therapy.","authors":"Rachel C Danczyk,&nbsp;Erica L Mitchell,&nbsp;Bryan D Petersen,&nbsp;James Edwards,&nbsp;Timothy K Liem,&nbsp;Gregory J Landry,&nbsp;Gregory L Moneta","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare patient outcomes of primary open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with those of secondary open operations for failed endovascular therapy (ET) of AIOD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital from January 1, 1998, through March 31, 2010.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent primary open operation for AIOD or secondary open operation for failed ET of AIOD.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Overall survival and limb salvage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary open operations (n = 153) were 67 aortobifemoral grafts (43.8%), 38 axillobifemoral grafts (24.8%), and 48 femoral-femoral grafts (31.4%). Secondary open operations (n = 35) were 28 aortobifemoral grafts (80.0%), 5 axillobifemoral grafts (14.3%), and 2 femoral-femoral grafts (5.7%). Mean (SD) 5-year survival was 48.2% (5.6%) and 66.8% (10.0%), respectively, for patients undergoing primary vs secondary open surgery for AIOD (P = .01). There were 7 amputations during a mean follow-up of 3 years, all in the primary open surgery group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a higher proportion of coronary artery disease and a 20% conversion of claudication to critical limb ischemia after failed ET for AIOD, survival was longer in patients undergoing secondary vs primary open surgery. Patients who underwent open surgery after failed ET for AIOD did not require amputation. Failed ET for AIOD does not lead to worse outcomes for patients undergoing open surgery for AIOD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"841-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1649","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30912640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Could the endo-first strategy really be better? 内优先策略真的会更好吗?
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.2021
Jason T Lee
sion. Danczyk et al 1 hypothesized that failed endovascular AIOD procedures lead to worse outcomes when converted to open surgery and review their 12-year experience. To my surprise, and I suspect somewhat to theirs, this turns out not to be the case. In fact, survival and outcomes of the secondary open operations are actually better than those of primary open operations (5-year survival, 67% vs 48%). Although there may be numerous explanations for this observation that the authors acknowledge is counterintuitive, one of the takeaway messages of this article is that secondary open conversion after failed AIOD endovascular treatment is at least not worse. Unlike failed infrainguinal endovascular interventions that often lead to higher rates of amputation, failed endovascular AIOD treatments were not associated with this. To answer the question I pose in the title, this article providescompellingevidencethatforinflowdisease,endovascular interventions should be the preferred initial route. In terms of patency, durability, patient comfort, and physician comfort, iliac stenting is at least as good as, if not better than, aortofemoral bypass. We now have evidencethat,evenifthereissomefearoflong-termconsequencesfromiliacstentingshoulditfail,theopenconversion is not worse than initial primary open operations. The endo-first, and many times an endo-second and endo-third, approach for AIOD is justified for most patients, and this strategy, even if it fails, is not hurting patients or their long-term outcomes.
{"title":"Could the endo-first strategy really be better?","authors":"Jason T Lee","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2021","url":null,"abstract":"sion. Danczyk et al 1 hypothesized that failed endovascular AIOD procedures lead to worse outcomes when converted to open surgery and review their 12-year experience. To my surprise, and I suspect somewhat to theirs, this turns out not to be the case. In fact, survival and outcomes of the secondary open operations are actually better than those of primary open operations (5-year survival, 67% vs 48%). Although there may be numerous explanations for this observation that the authors acknowledge is counterintuitive, one of the takeaway messages of this article is that secondary open conversion after failed AIOD endovascular treatment is at least not worse. Unlike failed infrainguinal endovascular interventions that often lead to higher rates of amputation, failed endovascular AIOD treatments were not associated with this. To answer the question I pose in the title, this article providescompellingevidencethatforinflowdisease,endovascular interventions should be the preferred initial route. In terms of patency, durability, patient comfort, and physician comfort, iliac stenting is at least as good as, if not better than, aortofemoral bypass. We now have evidencethat,evenifthereissomefearoflong-termconsequencesfromiliacstentingshoulditfail,theopenconversion is not worse than initial primary open operations. The endo-first, and many times an endo-second and endo-third, approach for AIOD is justified for most patients, and this strategy, even if it fails, is not hurting patients or their long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30912641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
What you hear is what you get. 你听到的就是你得到的。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.2168
Julie Ann Freischlag
{"title":"What you hear is what you get.","authors":"Julie Ann Freischlag","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.2168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2168","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"795"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2168","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30912755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative imaging of pulmonary metastases in patients with melanoma: implications for minimally invasive techniques. 黑素瘤患者肺转移的术前影像学:微创技术的意义。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1667
Travis B Kidner, Jeong Yoon, Mark B Faries, Donald L Morton

Hypothesis: Preoperative imaging underestimates the number of pulmonary melanoma metastases. Although thoracoscopic resection is less invasive than resection via thoracotomy, it does not allow manual palpation of the lung to identify any metastases not visible on the preoperative scan or at the time of resection.

Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: A total of 170 patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography of the chest, followed within 30 days by thoracotomy for resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

Main outcome measures: Number of pathology-confirmed pulmonary metastases detected by preoperative chest computed tomography vs intraoperative manual palpation.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 49.5 years at initial diagnosis of melanoma and 57.1 years at diagnosis of pulmonary metastases; 69% of patients were male. A total of 334 pulmonary metastases were resected; the mean lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.1-14.0 cm). In 49 of 190 pulmonary resections (26%), manual palpation of the subpleural parenchyma revealed lesions not identified during preoperative imaging. The rate of 5-year overall survival was 33%.

Conclusions: Preoperative imaging underestimates the number of pulmonary lesions in patients with metastatic melanoma. Because incomplete resection of metastatic disease is associated with worse outcomes, we recommend caution when considering a minimally invasive approach for the resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

假设:术前影像学低估了肺黑色素瘤转移的数量。虽然胸腔镜切除比开胸切除侵入性小,但它不允许手工触诊肺部以识别术前扫描或切除时未见的转移灶。设计:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:共有170例患者术前行胸部计算机断层扫描,随后在30天内开胸切除肺转移性黑色素瘤。主要观察指标:术前胸部计算机断层扫描与术中手工触诊病理证实的肺转移灶数量。结果:初诊黑色素瘤患者的平均年龄为49.5岁,肺转移患者的平均年龄为57.1岁;69%的患者为男性。共切除334例肺转移灶;平均病灶大小为2.0 cm(范围0.1 ~ 14.0 cm)。在190例肺切除术中有49例(26%),手工触诊胸膜下实质发现术前影像学未发现的病变。5年总生存率为33%。结论:术前影像学低估了转移性黑色素瘤患者肺部病变的数量。由于转移性疾病的不完全切除与较差的预后相关,我们建议在考虑采用微创方法切除肺转移性黑色素瘤时要谨慎。
{"title":"Preoperative imaging of pulmonary metastases in patients with melanoma: implications for minimally invasive techniques.","authors":"Travis B Kidner,&nbsp;Jeong Yoon,&nbsp;Mark B Faries,&nbsp;Donald L Morton","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1667","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Preoperative imaging underestimates the number of pulmonary melanoma metastases. Although thoracoscopic resection is less invasive than resection via thoracotomy, it does not allow manual palpation of the lung to identify any metastases not visible on the preoperative scan or at the time of resection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 170 patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography of the chest, followed within 30 days by thoracotomy for resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Number of pathology-confirmed pulmonary metastases detected by preoperative chest computed tomography vs intraoperative manual palpation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 49.5 years at initial diagnosis of melanoma and 57.1 years at diagnosis of pulmonary metastases; 69% of patients were male. A total of 334 pulmonary metastases were resected; the mean lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.1-14.0 cm). In 49 of 190 pulmonary resections (26%), manual palpation of the subpleural parenchyma revealed lesions not identified during preoperative imaging. The rate of 5-year overall survival was 33%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative imaging underestimates the number of pulmonary lesions in patients with metastatic melanoma. Because incomplete resection of metastatic disease is associated with worse outcomes, we recommend caution when considering a minimally invasive approach for the resection of pulmonary metastatic melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"871-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1667","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30913670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Detection of colon cancer metastases with fluorescence laparoscopy in orthotopic nude mouse models. 荧光腹腔镜在原位裸鼠模型中检测结肠癌转移。
Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.704
Rhiana S Menen, Sharmeela Kaushal, Cynthia S Snyder, Mark A Talamini, Robert M Hoffman, Michael Bouvet

Objective: To improve detection of colon cancer metastases using fluorescence laparoscopy (FL).

Design: An orthotopic mouse model of human colon cancer was established by intracecal injection of HCT-116 human colon cancer cells expressing green fluorescent protein into 12 mice. One group modeled early disease and the second modeled late metastatic disease. For the early-disease model, 2 weeks after implantation, 6 mice underwent 2 modalities of laparoscopy: bright field laparoscopy (BL) and FL. The number of metastases identified within each of the 4 abdominal quadrants was recorded with both laparoscopy modalities. This process was repeated in the late-metastatic disease group 4 weeks after implantation. All animals were then humanely sacrificed and imaged using open fluorescence laparoscopy (OL) as a positive control to identify metastases.

Setting: Basic science laboratory.

Participants: Twelve female, 6-week-old nude mice.

Interventions: Detection of tumor foci by FL compared with BL.

Main outcome measures: Number of tumors identified in each quadrant. RESULTS Fluorescence laparoscopy enabled superior visualization of colon cancer metastases compared with BL in the early (P = .03) and late (P = .002) models of colon cancer. Compared with OL, BL was significantly inferior in the early (P = .04) and late (P < .001) groups. Fluorescence laparoscopy was not significantly different from OL in the early (P = .85) or late (P = .46) group. Thus, FL allowed identification of micrometastases that could not be distinguished from surrounding tissue using BL.

Conclusions: The use of FL enables identification of metastases that could not be visualized using standard laparoscopy. This report illustrates the important clinical potential for FL in the surgical treatment of cancer.

目的:提高荧光腹腔镜(FL)对结肠癌转移的检测水平。设计:将表达绿色荧光蛋白的HCT-116人结肠癌细胞注入12只小鼠,建立人结肠癌原位小鼠模型。一组模拟早期疾病,另一组模拟晚期转移性疾病。对于早期疾病模型,在植入后2周,6只小鼠进行了两种腹腔镜检查:亮场腹腔镜检查(BL)和FL。两种腹腔镜检查方式记录了4个腹部象限内每一个象限内发现的转移瘤数量。这一过程在移植后4周的晚期转移性疾病组重复。然后将所有动物人道处死,并使用开放荧光腹腔镜(OL)作为阳性对照进行成像以确定转移。单位:基础科学实验室。参与者:12只6周大的雌性裸鼠。干预措施:比较FL和bl检测肿瘤病灶。主要结局指标:每个象限中发现的肿瘤数量。结果在结肠癌早期(P = 0.03)和晚期(P = 0.002)模型中,与BL相比,荧光腹腔镜能更好地显示结肠癌转移灶。早期组(P = 0.04)和晚期组(P < 0.001)的BL明显低于对照组(P < 0.01)。荧光腹腔镜在早期组(P = 0.85)和晚期组(P = 0.46)与OL组无显著差异。因此,FL可以识别无法与bl区分的微转移灶。结论:使用FL可以识别标准腹腔镜无法观察到的转移灶。本报告说明了FL在肿瘤手术治疗中的重要临床潜力。
{"title":"Detection of colon cancer metastases with fluorescence laparoscopy in orthotopic nude mouse models.","authors":"Rhiana S Menen,&nbsp;Sharmeela Kaushal,&nbsp;Cynthia S Snyder,&nbsp;Mark A Talamini,&nbsp;Robert M Hoffman,&nbsp;Michael Bouvet","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve detection of colon cancer metastases using fluorescence laparoscopy (FL).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An orthotopic mouse model of human colon cancer was established by intracecal injection of HCT-116 human colon cancer cells expressing green fluorescent protein into 12 mice. One group modeled early disease and the second modeled late metastatic disease. For the early-disease model, 2 weeks after implantation, 6 mice underwent 2 modalities of laparoscopy: bright field laparoscopy (BL) and FL. The number of metastases identified within each of the 4 abdominal quadrants was recorded with both laparoscopy modalities. This process was repeated in the late-metastatic disease group 4 weeks after implantation. All animals were then humanely sacrificed and imaged using open fluorescence laparoscopy (OL) as a positive control to identify metastases.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Basic science laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twelve female, 6-week-old nude mice.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Detection of tumor foci by FL compared with BL.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Number of tumors identified in each quadrant. RESULTS Fluorescence laparoscopy enabled superior visualization of colon cancer metastases compared with BL in the early (P = .03) and late (P = .002) models of colon cancer. Compared with OL, BL was significantly inferior in the early (P = .04) and late (P < .001) groups. Fluorescence laparoscopy was not significantly different from OL in the early (P = .85) or late (P = .46) group. Thus, FL allowed identification of micrometastases that could not be distinguished from surrounding tissue using BL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of FL enables identification of metastases that could not be visualized using standard laparoscopy. This report illustrates the important clinical potential for FL in the surgical treatment of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"876-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.704","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30913671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
期刊
Archives of Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1