Yizhou Chen, Duong T. Nguyen, John Webster, Thi Hong Tham Nguyen, Grant A. Herron
In October 2020, Liriomyza huidobrensis (serpentine leafminer [SLM]) was first detected in Western Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), and subsequently Southern Queensland (QLD). Control failures were reported, and insecticide resistance was confirmed via bioassay, but mechanisms causing resistance remained unknown. We characterised the complete mRNA sequence of eight insecticide target genes of L. huidobrensis using RNA sequencing. We found that the Australian SLM carries three mutations (I129V, G227A and F331W) of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) gene, causing resistance to mode of action (MOA) 1 chemicals; one mutation (A301S) of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta (GABAR), causing resistance to MOA 2 chemicals; and two mutations (M918T and L1014L) of the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene, causing resistance to MOA 3 chemicals. We consequently developed a multiamplicon-sequencing panel to screen 234 Australian field-collected SLM samples using next-generation sequencing. The multiplex panel includes mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) for species identification and AChE, VGSC, glutamate-gated chloride channel (GluCl) and chitin synthase 1 (CHS1) gene mutations. We confirm that all the individuals carry the multi-resistance alleles in a homozygous and fixed state. This is a rare phenomenon for a single individual to be homozygous for multiple resistance mutations, with only a few studies documenting such multi-resistance at the population level. Such resistance mechanism detection raises concern that there are limited chemical options for the control of invasive SLM in Australia.
{"title":"Homozygous multiple-insecticide resistance in Australian invasive serpentine leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) (Diptera: Agromyzidae)","authors":"Yizhou Chen, Duong T. Nguyen, John Webster, Thi Hong Tham Nguyen, Grant A. Herron","doi":"10.1111/aen.12733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12733","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In October 2020, <i>Liriomyza huidobrensis</i> (serpentine leafminer [SLM]) was first detected in Western Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), and subsequently Southern Queensland (QLD). Control failures were reported, and insecticide resistance was confirmed via bioassay, but mechanisms causing resistance remained unknown. We characterised the complete mRNA sequence of eight insecticide target genes of <i>L. huidobrensis</i> using RNA sequencing. We found that the Australian SLM carries three mutations (I129V, G227A and F331W) of the acetylcholinesterase (<i>AChE</i>) gene, causing resistance to mode of action (MOA) 1 chemicals; one mutation (A301S) of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta (<i>GABAR</i>), causing resistance to MOA 2 chemicals; and two mutations (M918T and L1014L) of the voltage-gated sodium channel (<i>VGSC</i>) gene, causing resistance to MOA 3 chemicals. We consequently developed a multiamplicon-sequencing panel to screen 234 Australian field-collected SLM samples using next-generation sequencing. The multiplex panel includes mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (<i>COI</i>) for species identification and <i>AChE</i>, <i>VGSC</i>, glutamate-gated chloride channel (<i>GluCl</i>) and chitin synthase 1 (<i>CHS1</i>) gene mutations. We confirm that all the individuals carry the multi-resistance alleles in a homozygous and fixed state. This is a rare phenomenon for a single individual to be homozygous for multiple resistance mutations, with only a few studies documenting such multi-resistance at the population level. Such resistance mechanism detection raises concern that there are limited chemical options for the control of invasive SLM in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12733","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143116709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John M. Tomerini, Matthew G. De Faveri, Stefano G. De Faveri, Carole Wright, Matthew S. Siderhurst
Understanding the movement dynamics of fruit flies is critical to both surveillance and control strategies with much of what is known coming from mark–release–recapture or flight mill studies. However, recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of field-tracking fruit flies using harmonic radar (HR). In this study, the effects of attaching HR tags to Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera jarvisi were assessed in large indoor cages with both cultured and wild flies. The Queensland fruit fly, B. tryoni, is a major horticultural pest in the Northern Territory and east coast of Australia. Jarvis' fruit fly, B. jarvisi, is one of the lesser Australian fruit fly species, with a distribution in northern and eastern Australia. Three flight-associated behavioural parameters were recorded: (1) flight success (proportion of flies that flew), (2) time to flight (period from release to take-off) and (3) flight duration (period from take-off to landing). Untagged flies were more likely to fly and also took flight more quickly than tagged flies with this result holding across fly species and fly origin (wild or cultured). Similarly, wild flies were more likely to fly than cultured flies, but no differences were observed between the flight successes of the two fruit fly species. For all tagged flies, mean time to flight increased with successive flight trials, while untagged flies mean time to flight over time varied with species and fly origin. The effect of tagging on flight duration varied by species (tagged > untagged for B. tryoni, tagged < untagged for B. jarvisi) but not by fly origin with species. Together, these results quantify the negative effects of HR tagging on B. tryoni and B. jarvisi flight behaviours that should be taken into account when interpreting the biological relevance of HR tracking studies. These results also suggest that HR tracking of fruit flies would benefit from the further development of smaller and lighter tags.
{"title":"Impacts of harmonic radar tagging on the flight ability of male Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera jarvisi (Diptera, Tephritidae)","authors":"John M. Tomerini, Matthew G. De Faveri, Stefano G. De Faveri, Carole Wright, Matthew S. Siderhurst","doi":"10.1111/aen.12728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12728","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the movement dynamics of fruit flies is critical to both surveillance and control strategies with much of what is known coming from mark–release–recapture or flight mill studies. However, recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of field-tracking fruit flies using harmonic radar (HR). In this study, the effects of attaching HR tags to <i>Bactrocera tryoni</i> and <i>Bactrocera jarvisi</i> were assessed in large indoor cages with both cultured and wild flies. The Queensland fruit fly, <i>B. tryoni</i>, is a major horticultural pest in the Northern Territory and east coast of Australia. Jarvis' fruit fly, <i>B. jarvisi</i>, is one of the lesser Australian fruit fly species, with a distribution in northern and eastern Australia. Three flight-associated behavioural parameters were recorded: (1) flight success (proportion of flies that flew), (2) time to flight (period from release to take-off) and (3) flight duration (period from take-off to landing). Untagged flies were more likely to fly and also took flight more quickly than tagged flies with this result holding across fly species and fly origin (wild or cultured). Similarly, wild flies were more likely to fly than cultured flies, but no differences were observed between the flight successes of the two fruit fly species. For all tagged flies, mean time to flight increased with successive flight trials, while untagged flies mean time to flight over time varied with species and fly origin. The effect of tagging on flight duration varied by species (tagged > untagged for <i>B. tryoni</i>, tagged < untagged for <i>B. jarvisi</i>) but not by fly origin with species. Together, these results quantify the negative effects of HR tagging on <i>B. tryoni</i> and <i>B. jarvisi</i> flight behaviours that should be taken into account when interpreting the biological relevance of HR tracking studies. These results also suggest that HR tracking of fruit flies would benefit from the further development of smaller and lighter tags.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143116711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}