Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605030-00006
Neil Martin, Peter T Reid
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterised by reversible airflow obstruction and airway hyperreactivity. The course of the illness may be punctuated by exacerbations resulting in deterioration in quality of life and, in some cases, days lost from school or work. That asthma is common and increasingly prevalent magnifies the importance of any potential economic costs, and promoting asthma control represents an important public health agenda. While lifestyle changes represent a valuable contribution in some patients, the majority of asthmatic patients require therapeutic intervention. The recognition of the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to an emphasis on regular anti-inflammatory therapy, of which inhaled corticosteroid treatment remains the most superior. In selected patients, further improvements in asthma control may be gained by the addition of regular inhaled long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists or oral leukotriene receptor antagonists to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. However, a significant minority of patients with asthma remain poorly controlled despite appropriate treatment, suggesting that additional corticosteroid nonresponsive inflammatory pathways may be operative. Furthermore, some patients with asthma display an accelerated decline in lung function, suggesting that active airway re-modeling is occurring. Such observations have focused attention on the potential to develop new therapies which complement existing treatments by targeting additional inflammatory pathways. The central role of phosphodiesterase (PDE), and in particular the PDE4 enzyme, in the regulation of key inflammatory cells believed to be important in asthma - including eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils and airway smooth muscle - suggests that drugs designed to target this enzyme will have the potential to deliver both bronchodilation and modulate the asthmatic inflammatory response. In vivo studies on individual inflammatory cells suggest that the effects are likely to be favorable in asthma, and animal study models have provided proof of concept; however, first-generation PDE inhibitors have been poorly tolerated due to adverse effects. The development of second-generation agents such as cilomilast and roflumilast heralds a further opportunity to test the potential of these agents, although to date only a limited amount of data from human studies has been published, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.
{"title":"The potential role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of asthma.","authors":"Neil Martin, Peter T Reid","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605030-00006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605030-00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterised by reversible airflow obstruction and airway hyperreactivity. The course of the illness may be punctuated by exacerbations resulting in deterioration in quality of life and, in some cases, days lost from school or work. That asthma is common and increasingly prevalent magnifies the importance of any potential economic costs, and promoting asthma control represents an important public health agenda. While lifestyle changes represent a valuable contribution in some patients, the majority of asthmatic patients require therapeutic intervention. The recognition of the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to an emphasis on regular anti-inflammatory therapy, of which inhaled corticosteroid treatment remains the most superior. In selected patients, further improvements in asthma control may be gained by the addition of regular inhaled long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists or oral leukotriene receptor antagonists to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. However, a significant minority of patients with asthma remain poorly controlled despite appropriate treatment, suggesting that additional corticosteroid nonresponsive inflammatory pathways may be operative. Furthermore, some patients with asthma display an accelerated decline in lung function, suggesting that active airway re-modeling is occurring. Such observations have focused attention on the potential to develop new therapies which complement existing treatments by targeting additional inflammatory pathways. The central role of phosphodiesterase (PDE), and in particular the PDE4 enzyme, in the regulation of key inflammatory cells believed to be important in asthma - including eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils and airway smooth muscle - suggests that drugs designed to target this enzyme will have the potential to deliver both bronchodilation and modulate the asthmatic inflammatory response. In vivo studies on individual inflammatory cells suggest that the effects are likely to be favorable in asthma, and animal study models have provided proof of concept; however, first-generation PDE inhibitors have been poorly tolerated due to adverse effects. The development of second-generation agents such as cilomilast and roflumilast heralds a further opportunity to test the potential of these agents, although to date only a limited amount of data from human studies has been published, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"207-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605030-00006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26021702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605040-00001
Giovanni Passalacqua, Laura Guerra, Federica Fumagalli, Giorgio Walter Canonica
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was proposed for clinical practice about 20 years ago with the main aim of improving the safety and avoiding the adverse effects of traditional treatment for allergic airways disease. To date, 32 randomized controlled trials and 6 postmarketing surveys have been published that provide a robust documentation of the safety profile of the treatment.Looking at the randomized trials it emerges that the more frequent adverse event of SLIT is oral itching or swelling, followed by gastrointestinal complaints. These adverse events are invariably described as mild and easily managed by adjusting the dose. Relevant systemic adverse events (asthma, urticaria, angioedema) occur sporadically and, with the exception of oral/gastrointestinal adverse events, the incidence of adverse events seems not to differ between the placebo and active groups. The safety profile of SLIT does not differ between adults and children.The postmarketing surveys consistently show that the incidence of adverse events associated with SLIT is less than 10%, corresponding to less than 1 adverse event per 1000 doses, and is thus quite superior to the safety profile of subcutaneous immunotherapy. Of note, the most recent data show that the rate of adverse events with SLIT is not increased in children below the age of 5 years.
{"title":"Safety profile of sublingual immunotherapy.","authors":"Giovanni Passalacqua, Laura Guerra, Federica Fumagalli, Giorgio Walter Canonica","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605040-00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605040-00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was proposed for clinical practice about 20 years ago with the main aim of improving the safety and avoiding the adverse effects of traditional treatment for allergic airways disease. To date, 32 randomized controlled trials and 6 postmarketing surveys have been published that provide a robust documentation of the safety profile of the treatment.Looking at the randomized trials it emerges that the more frequent adverse event of SLIT is oral itching or swelling, followed by gastrointestinal complaints. These adverse events are invariably described as mild and easily managed by adjusting the dose. Relevant systemic adverse events (asthma, urticaria, angioedema) occur sporadically and, with the exception of oral/gastrointestinal adverse events, the incidence of adverse events seems not to differ between the placebo and active groups. The safety profile of SLIT does not differ between adults and children.The postmarketing surveys consistently show that the incidence of adverse events associated with SLIT is less than 10%, corresponding to less than 1 adverse event per 1000 doses, and is thus quite superior to the safety profile of subcutaneous immunotherapy. Of note, the most recent data show that the rate of adverse events with SLIT is not increased in children below the age of 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 4","pages":"225-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605040-00001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26115655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605010-00001
Raymond O Powrie, Lucia Larson, Margaret Miller
Pregnancy does not appear to have a consistent effect on the frequency or severity of asthma. The most common cause of worsening asthma in pregnancy is likely to be noncompliance with medication. Emphasizing to the patient in advance that fetal well-being is dependent on maternal well-being may help prevent this.In general, well controlled asthma is not associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Essential to successful asthma management is patient education that helps to ensure effective medication use, avoidance of triggers, and prompt treatment. This education should include measurement of peak expiratory flow rate and a written asthma action plan. Most of the medications that are used to control asthma in the general population can be safely used in pregnant women. Inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists), cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), and inhaled and systemic corticosteroids all appear to be very well tolerated by the fetus. Budesonide and beclomethasone should be considered as the preferred inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma in pregnancy. Use of the leukotriene receptor antagonists zafirlukast and montelukast in pregnancy is probably safe but should be limited to special circumstances, where they are viewed essential for asthma control. Zileuton should not be used in pregnancy.Acute asthma exacerbations in pregnant women should be treated in a similar manner to that in non-pregnant patients. Maternal blood glucose levels should be monitored periodically in pregnant women receiving systemic corticosteroids because of the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia upon embryos and fetuses. During pregnancy, maternal arterial oxygen saturations should be kept above 95% if possible for fetal well-being. Ambulatory oxygenation should be checked prior to discharge to ensure that women do not desaturate with their daily activities.Acute exacerbations of asthma during labor and delivery are rare. Dinoprost, ergometrine, and other ergot derivatives can cause severe bronchospasm, especially when used in combination with general anesthesia, and should be avoided in asthmatic patients. Pregnant women who have been treated with corticosteroids in the past year may require stress-dose corticosteroids during labor and delivery. Most asthma medications, including oral prednisone, are considered compatible with breast-feeding.
{"title":"Managing asthma in expectant mothers.","authors":"Raymond O Powrie, Lucia Larson, Margaret Miller","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605010-00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605010-00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnancy does not appear to have a consistent effect on the frequency or severity of asthma. The most common cause of worsening asthma in pregnancy is likely to be noncompliance with medication. Emphasizing to the patient in advance that fetal well-being is dependent on maternal well-being may help prevent this.In general, well controlled asthma is not associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Essential to successful asthma management is patient education that helps to ensure effective medication use, avoidance of triggers, and prompt treatment. This education should include measurement of peak expiratory flow rate and a written asthma action plan. Most of the medications that are used to control asthma in the general population can be safely used in pregnant women. Inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists), cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), and inhaled and systemic corticosteroids all appear to be very well tolerated by the fetus. Budesonide and beclomethasone should be considered as the preferred inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma in pregnancy. Use of the leukotriene receptor antagonists zafirlukast and montelukast in pregnancy is probably safe but should be limited to special circumstances, where they are viewed essential for asthma control. Zileuton should not be used in pregnancy.Acute asthma exacerbations in pregnant women should be treated in a similar manner to that in non-pregnant patients. Maternal blood glucose levels should be monitored periodically in pregnant women receiving systemic corticosteroids because of the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia upon embryos and fetuses. During pregnancy, maternal arterial oxygen saturations should be kept above 95% if possible for fetal well-being. Ambulatory oxygenation should be checked prior to discharge to ensure that women do not desaturate with their daily activities.Acute exacerbations of asthma during labor and delivery are rare. Dinoprost, ergometrine, and other ergot derivatives can cause severe bronchospasm, especially when used in combination with general anesthesia, and should be avoided in asthmatic patients. Pregnant women who have been treated with corticosteroids in the past year may require stress-dose corticosteroids during labor and delivery. Most asthma medications, including oral prednisone, are considered compatible with breast-feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605010-00001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25797578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605050-00002
Olof Selroos, Lars Borgström, Jarl Ingelf
The dry-powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler((R)) has been on the market for nearly two decades. Products containing terbutaline, formoterol, budesonide, and the combination budesonide/formoterol are widely used by patients with asthma and COPD. Most patients and physicians find Turbuhaler((R)) easy to use, and local side effects are rare. This is thought to arise from the lack of additives or only small amounts in the formulation, in addition to minimal deposition of the drug in the oropharynx and on the vocal cords during inspiration.The function of Turbuhaler((R)) has frequently been questioned. This article aims to review and clarify some key issues that have been challenged in the literature (e.g. the effectiveness of Turbuhaler((R)) in patients with more restricting conditions), to discuss the importance of lung deposition, and to explain the low in vivo variability associated with Turbuhaler((R)) and the lack of correlation with the higher in vitro variability.Turbuhaler((R)), like other DPIs, is flow dependent to some degree. However, a peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through Turbuhaler((R)) of 30 L/min gives a good clinical effect. These PIF values can be obtained by patients with conditions thought to be difficult to manage with inhalational agents, such as asthmatic children and adult patients with acute severe airway obstruction and COPD. Excellent clinical results with Turbuhaler((R)) in large controlled studies in patients with COPD and acute severe airway obstruction provide indirect evidence that medication delivered via Turbuhaler((R)) reaches the target organ.Due to the large amount of small particles and the moderate inbuilt resistance in Turbuhaler((R)), which opens up the vocal cords during inhalation, Turbuhaler((R)) is associated with a high lung deposition (25-40% of the delivered dose) compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and other DPIs. A good correlation has been found between lung deposition and clinical efficacy. A high lung deposition always results in the best ratio between clinical efficacy and risk of unwanted systemic activity. Studies with Turbuhaler((R)) also show that the in vivo variation in lung deposition is significantly lower compared with a pMDI or, for example, the Diskus((R)) inhaler, and much lower than the in vitro dose variability seen in laboratory tests. Turbuhaler((R)) appears to be a reliable DPI which can be used with confidence by patients with airway diseases, including those with clinical conditions believed to be difficult to manage with inhalational therapy.
{"title":"Performance of Turbuhaler((R)) in Patients with Acute Airway Obstruction and COPD, and in Children with Asthma : Understanding the Clinical Importance of Adequate Peak Inspiratory Flow, High Lung Deposition, and Low In Vivo Dose Variability.","authors":"Olof Selroos, Lars Borgström, Jarl Ingelf","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605050-00002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605050-00002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dry-powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler((R)) has been on the market for nearly two decades. Products containing terbutaline, formoterol, budesonide, and the combination budesonide/formoterol are widely used by patients with asthma and COPD. Most patients and physicians find Turbuhaler((R)) easy to use, and local side effects are rare. This is thought to arise from the lack of additives or only small amounts in the formulation, in addition to minimal deposition of the drug in the oropharynx and on the vocal cords during inspiration.The function of Turbuhaler((R)) has frequently been questioned. This article aims to review and clarify some key issues that have been challenged in the literature (e.g. the effectiveness of Turbuhaler((R)) in patients with more restricting conditions), to discuss the importance of lung deposition, and to explain the low in vivo variability associated with Turbuhaler((R)) and the lack of correlation with the higher in vitro variability.Turbuhaler((R)), like other DPIs, is flow dependent to some degree. However, a peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through Turbuhaler((R)) of 30 L/min gives a good clinical effect. These PIF values can be obtained by patients with conditions thought to be difficult to manage with inhalational agents, such as asthmatic children and adult patients with acute severe airway obstruction and COPD. Excellent clinical results with Turbuhaler((R)) in large controlled studies in patients with COPD and acute severe airway obstruction provide indirect evidence that medication delivered via Turbuhaler((R)) reaches the target organ.Due to the large amount of small particles and the moderate inbuilt resistance in Turbuhaler((R)), which opens up the vocal cords during inhalation, Turbuhaler((R)) is associated with a high lung deposition (25-40% of the delivered dose) compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and other DPIs. A good correlation has been found between lung deposition and clinical efficacy. A high lung deposition always results in the best ratio between clinical efficacy and risk of unwanted systemic activity. Studies with Turbuhaler((R)) also show that the in vivo variation in lung deposition is significantly lower compared with a pMDI or, for example, the Diskus((R)) inhaler, and much lower than the in vitro dose variability seen in laboratory tests. Turbuhaler((R)) appears to be a reliable DPI which can be used with confidence by patients with airway diseases, including those with clinical conditions believed to be difficult to manage with inhalational therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 5","pages":"305-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605050-00002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26216206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605020-00004
Septimiu D Murgu, Henri G Colt
Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) and excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) are both dynamic forms of central airway obstruction characterized by a decrease of >/=50% in the cross-sectional area of the tracheobronchial lumen. The differences between these two entities, however, are not uniformly accepted in the medical community. While TBM is characterized by a weakness of the tracheobronchial cartilaginous structures, EDAC is marked by excessive bulging of the posterior membrane into the airway lumen during exhalation. These disease entities are probably underdiagnosed because they present with a variety of nonspecific symptoms similar to patients with other obstructive ventilatory disorders such as asthma and COPD. Diagnosis is confirmed by dynamic radiologic imaging studies or bronchoscopy. Current therapeutic management depends on the extent, type, and severity of airway abnormalities noted and the clinical presentation. Proposed management alternatives include conservative medical therapy, and minimally invasive and open surgical interventions. Inhaled bronchodilators should be used only if symptoms and ventilatory function improve after use. Continuous positive airway pressure acts as a pneumatic stent and should be considered as an alternative or additional therapeutic modality. Endoluminal stent insertion can improve symptoms and pulmonary function in patients with central airway obstruction and should be considered for patients with symptoms refractory to conservative therapy. Several open surgical procedures have also been performed over the years, including tracheostomy, airway splinting, tracheal resection and, more recently, external tracheal stents. Endobronchial laser therapy, resorbable stents, application of grafting materials used to support the collapsed airway as well as the use of cartilage regeneration techniques are experimental, and their efficacy in humans remains to be determined. Future studies should compare therapeutic interventions and outcomes such as functional status, ventilatory function, and bronchoscopic and radiologic appearances in order to define the costs and benefits of individual and combined treatment modalities.
{"title":"Treatment of adult tracheobronchomalacia and excessive dynamic airway collapse : an update.","authors":"Septimiu D Murgu, Henri G Colt","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605020-00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) and excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) are both dynamic forms of central airway obstruction characterized by a decrease of >/=50% in the cross-sectional area of the tracheobronchial lumen. The differences between these two entities, however, are not uniformly accepted in the medical community. While TBM is characterized by a weakness of the tracheobronchial cartilaginous structures, EDAC is marked by excessive bulging of the posterior membrane into the airway lumen during exhalation. These disease entities are probably underdiagnosed because they present with a variety of nonspecific symptoms similar to patients with other obstructive ventilatory disorders such as asthma and COPD. Diagnosis is confirmed by dynamic radiologic imaging studies or bronchoscopy. Current therapeutic management depends on the extent, type, and severity of airway abnormalities noted and the clinical presentation. Proposed management alternatives include conservative medical therapy, and minimally invasive and open surgical interventions. Inhaled bronchodilators should be used only if symptoms and ventilatory function improve after use. Continuous positive airway pressure acts as a pneumatic stent and should be considered as an alternative or additional therapeutic modality. Endoluminal stent insertion can improve symptoms and pulmonary function in patients with central airway obstruction and should be considered for patients with symptoms refractory to conservative therapy. Several open surgical procedures have also been performed over the years, including tracheostomy, airway splinting, tracheal resection and, more recently, external tracheal stents. Endobronchial laser therapy, resorbable stents, application of grafting materials used to support the collapsed airway as well as the use of cartilage regeneration techniques are experimental, and their efficacy in humans remains to be determined. Future studies should compare therapeutic interventions and outcomes such as functional status, ventilatory function, and bronchoscopic and radiologic appearances in order to define the costs and benefits of individual and combined treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"103-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25885296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200605060-00004
Gennaro D'Amato, Enrica Bucchioni, Virginio Oldani, Walter Canonica
Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways which is recognized as a highly prevalent health problem in both the developed and the developing world, with significant human and economic consequences.Allergy is acknowledged as a major risk factor for asthma. The pathogenetic aspects of allergic asthma are characterized by airway inflammation with infiltration of mast cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes and T helper type 2 lymphocytes, along with the isotype switching of B cells to generate immunoglobulins of the immunoglobulin E (IgE) class. Increased asthma severity is not only associated with recurrent hospitalization and increased mortality but also with higher social costs.Inhaled corticosteroids are the standard anti-inflammatory medication and are effective for most asthma patients, but there is a substantial number of asthmatics who remain symptomatic even after receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), and sometimes are in need of systemic corticosteroids to control the disease. These patients account for about 50% of the healthcare costs of asthma.New treatment options more specifically targeting the pathophysiologic events causing development of asthma are therefore required in these patients.A novel therapeutic approach to asthma and other allergic respiratory diseases involves interference with the action of IgE and prevention of subsequent IgE-mediated responses.Omalizumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal anti-IgE antibody developed for the treatment of allergic diseases, with clear efficacy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. This non-anaphylactogenic anti-IgE antibody inhibits IgE functions by blocking free serum IgE and inhibiting their binding to cellular receptors. Omalizumab therapy is well tolerated and significantly improves symptoms and disease control, and reduces asthma exacerbations and the need to use high dosages of inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, omalizumab improves quality of life of patients with severe persistent allergic asthma that is inadequately controlled by currently available asthma medications. In conclusion, omalizumab may fulfill an important need in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids +beta(2)-agonists.
{"title":"Treating Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma with a Recombinant Humanized Anti-IgE Monoclonal Antibody (Omalizumab).","authors":"Gennaro D'Amato, Enrica Bucchioni, Virginio Oldani, Walter Canonica","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605060-00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways which is recognized as a highly prevalent health problem in both the developed and the developing world, with significant human and economic consequences.Allergy is acknowledged as a major risk factor for asthma. The pathogenetic aspects of allergic asthma are characterized by airway inflammation with infiltration of mast cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes and T helper type 2 lymphocytes, along with the isotype switching of B cells to generate immunoglobulins of the immunoglobulin E (IgE) class. Increased asthma severity is not only associated with recurrent hospitalization and increased mortality but also with higher social costs.Inhaled corticosteroids are the standard anti-inflammatory medication and are effective for most asthma patients, but there is a substantial number of asthmatics who remain symptomatic even after receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), and sometimes are in need of systemic corticosteroids to control the disease. These patients account for about 50% of the healthcare costs of asthma.New treatment options more specifically targeting the pathophysiologic events causing development of asthma are therefore required in these patients.A novel therapeutic approach to asthma and other allergic respiratory diseases involves interference with the action of IgE and prevention of subsequent IgE-mediated responses.Omalizumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal anti-IgE antibody developed for the treatment of allergic diseases, with clear efficacy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. This non-anaphylactogenic anti-IgE antibody inhibits IgE functions by blocking free serum IgE and inhibiting their binding to cellular receptors. Omalizumab therapy is well tolerated and significantly improves symptoms and disease control, and reduces asthma exacerbations and the need to use high dosages of inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, omalizumab improves quality of life of patients with severe persistent allergic asthma that is inadequately controlled by currently available asthma medications. In conclusion, omalizumab may fulfill an important need in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids +beta(2)-agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 6","pages":"393-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26430832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}