首页 > 最新文献

Russian studies in history最新文献

英文 中文
The Russo–Turkish War, 1877–1878 俄土战争,1877-1878
Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1620030
V. Stepanov
The Russo-Turkish War (the Second Eastern War) of 1877–1878 was an epoch-making event in Russian history. It led to the liberation of the Balkan peoples from the Ottoman yoke and to major paradigm shifts in the international arena. During that campaign, a rift emerged in Russia’s relations with Germany and Austria-Hungary, after which the negotiations of 1881 and 1884 to restore the League of the Three Emperors [Dreikaiserbund] and keep up its arrangements and the talks leading to the Reinsurance Treaty [Rückversicherungsvertrag] of 1887 resulted in only a temporary reconciliation between the erstwhile partners. The war had initiated a change in Russia’s foreign-policy priorities that was expressed in an escalating standoff with neighboring empires and a transition to strategic cooperation with France. It also brought about significant changes within Russia. The diplomatic defeat at the Congress of Berlin [held in June and July 1878.—Trans.] bred social disenchantment and remorse about the war’s heavy loss of life and huge material outlays. This fostered an oppositionist mentality in the populace at large and served to energize the liberal movement and amplify radical activity. The hardships of war led to an exacerbation of social tensions in town and countryside alike. Amid the growing sense of having nowhere to turn that was besetting the upper echelons, the need to continue and complete the Great Reforms
1877-1878年的俄土战争(第二次东方战争)是俄罗斯历史上划时代的事件。它使巴尔干人民摆脱了奥斯曼帝国的束缚,并在国际舞台上发生了重大的范式转变。在那场战役中,俄罗斯与德国和奥匈帝国的关系出现了裂痕,之后,1881年和1884年为恢复三皇联盟(Dreikaiserbund)并继续其安排而进行的谈判,以及导致1887年再保险条约(Rückversicherungsvertrag)的谈判,只导致了昔日伙伴之间的暂时和解。这场战争引发了俄罗斯外交政策优先事项的变化,表现为与邻国帝国的对峙不断升级,以及向与法国的战略合作过渡。它也给俄罗斯内部带来了重大变化。1878年6月和7月举行的柏林会议的外交失败引发了社会对战争造成的重大生命损失和巨额物质支出的失望和悔恨。这在广大民众中培养了一种反对主义心态,并为自由主义运动注入了活力,扩大了激进活动。战争的艰辛导致城镇和乡村的社会紧张局势加剧。在困扰上层的无处可求助的日益强烈的感觉中,继续并完成大改革的必要性
{"title":"The Russo–Turkish War, 1877–1878","authors":"V. Stepanov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1620030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620030","url":null,"abstract":"The Russo-Turkish War (the Second Eastern War) of 1877–1878 was an epoch-making event in Russian history. It led to the liberation of the Balkan peoples from the Ottoman yoke and to major paradigm shifts in the international arena. During that campaign, a rift emerged in Russia’s relations with Germany and Austria-Hungary, after which the negotiations of 1881 and 1884 to restore the League of the Three Emperors [Dreikaiserbund] and keep up its arrangements and the talks leading to the Reinsurance Treaty [Rückversicherungsvertrag] of 1887 resulted in only a temporary reconciliation between the erstwhile partners. The war had initiated a change in Russia’s foreign-policy priorities that was expressed in an escalating standoff with neighboring empires and a transition to strategic cooperation with France. It also brought about significant changes within Russia. The diplomatic defeat at the Congress of Berlin [held in June and July 1878.—Trans.] bred social disenchantment and remorse about the war’s heavy loss of life and huge material outlays. This fostered an oppositionist mentality in the populace at large and served to energize the liberal movement and amplify radical activity. The hardships of war led to an exacerbation of social tensions in town and countryside alike. Amid the growing sense of having nowhere to turn that was besetting the upper echelons, the need to continue and complete the Great Reforms","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"181 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45508489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Autocracy and the “Slavic Movement” in Russia, 1875–1877 俄国的专制政体与“斯拉夫运动”(1875-1877
Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1620032
A. Mamonov
This article describes the higher bureaucracy’s attitude toward the “Slavic movement” in 1875–1877, necessary to understanding the Eastern crisis and the causes of the Russo–Turkish War. The “Slavic movement” encompassed the public activities of various individuals and groups, some of whom professed the ideology of Pan-Slavism. The author examines the misgivings and hopes of the governing elite on the eve of the war and demonstrates the effect that events in the Balkans had on Alexander II’s foreign policy. He concludes that the “Slavic movement” exerted pressure on the government and forced it to seek compromise and cooperation with society, thereby helping to bring about war with Turkey.
本文描述了1875年至1877年高级官僚机构对“斯拉夫运动”的态度,这对于理解东方危机和俄土战争的原因是必要的。“斯拉夫运动”包括各种个人和团体的公共活动,其中一些人宣称泛斯拉夫主义的意识形态。作者考察了战争前夕统治精英的疑虑和希望,并展示了巴尔干半岛事件对亚历山大二世外交政策的影响。他总结道,“斯拉夫运动”向政府施加压力,迫使政府寻求与社会的妥协与合作,从而促成了与土耳其的战争。
{"title":"The Autocracy and the “Slavic Movement” in Russia, 1875–1877","authors":"A. Mamonov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1620032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620032","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the higher bureaucracy’s attitude toward the “Slavic movement” in 1875–1877, necessary to understanding the Eastern crisis and the causes of the Russo–Turkish War. The “Slavic movement” encompassed the public activities of various individuals and groups, some of whom professed the ideology of Pan-Slavism. The author examines the misgivings and hopes of the governing elite on the eve of the war and demonstrates the effect that events in the Balkans had on Alexander II’s foreign policy. He concludes that the “Slavic movement” exerted pressure on the government and forced it to seek compromise and cooperation with society, thereby helping to bring about war with Turkey.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"185 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48219317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crown Prince Aleksandr Aleksandrovich during the Eastern Crisis of 1875–1878 1875-1878年东方危机期间的王储亚历山大·阿列克桑德罗维奇
Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1620031
V. A. Astankov
This article examines the attitude of the future Alexander III toward the Eastern crisis of 1875–1877 and the ensuing Russo–Turkish War. The author analyzes the royal heir’s attitude toward the actions of Russia’s diplomatic and military establishments on the eve of the war as well as the heir’s relationship with his father, Emperor Alexander II. The crown prince’s personal acquaintance with the harsh realities of war and its consequences would continue to sway his foreign policy agenda when he became Alexander III, known as the “Peacemaker Tsar.”
本文考察了未来的亚历山大三世对1875-1877年东方危机和随后的俄土战争的态度。作者分析了皇室继承人对战争前夕俄罗斯外交和军事机构的行为的态度,以及继承人与他的父亲亚历山大二世皇帝的关系。王储个人对战争的残酷现实及其后果的了解,将继续影响他成为亚历山大三世(Alexander III)后的外交政策议程,他被称为“和平缔造者沙皇”(Peacemaker沙皇)。
{"title":"Crown Prince Aleksandr Aleksandrovich during the Eastern Crisis of 1875–1878","authors":"V. A. Astankov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1620031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620031","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the attitude of the future Alexander III toward the Eastern crisis of 1875–1877 and the ensuing Russo–Turkish War. The author analyzes the royal heir’s attitude toward the actions of Russia’s diplomatic and military establishments on the eve of the war as well as the heir’s relationship with his father, Emperor Alexander II. The crown prince’s personal acquaintance with the harsh realities of war and its consequences would continue to sway his foreign policy agenda when he became Alexander III, known as the “Peacemaker Tsar.”","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"220 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46226989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Price of Victory 胜利的代价
Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1620033
V. Stepanov
This article examines the role of the economic factor in the war and the consequences of the war for the Russian economy. The author describes the country's critical economic situation and financial difficulties on the eve of the war. He concludes that the exorbitant expenditures on the war caused irreparable damage to the Russian treasury and forced the government to adopt a more circumspect foreign policy and avoid another international conflict.
本文考察了经济因素在战争中的作用以及战争对俄罗斯经济的影响。作者描述了战争前夕该国危急的经济形势和财政困难。他的结论是,战争的巨额开支给俄罗斯财政造成了无法弥补的损失,迫使政府采取更加谨慎的外交政策,避免另一场国际冲突。
{"title":"The Price of Victory","authors":"V. Stepanov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1620033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620033","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of the economic factor in the war and the consequences of the war for the Russian economy. The author describes the country's critical economic situation and financial difficulties on the eve of the war. He concludes that the exorbitant expenditures on the war caused irreparable damage to the Russian treasury and forced the government to adopt a more circumspect foreign policy and avoid another international conflict.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"245 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1620033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43371698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Russia, Turkey, and the Problem of the Black Sea Straits in 1898–1908 1898-1908年的俄罗斯、土耳其与黑海海峡问题
Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1586391
A. Boldyrev
The article deals with the main geopolitical problem in Russian—Ottoman relations at the turn of the twentieth century. Using ample archive sources the author shows the course of Russia’s struggle for influence in the straits. He concludes that the Ottoman policy was more flexible and the Turks proved able to assert their interests in the region. At the same time the straits question did not become the cause of any serious escalation between the two powers.
本文论述了二十世纪之交俄奥斯曼关系中的主要地缘政治问题。作者利用大量的档案资料,展示了俄罗斯在海峡争夺影响力的过程。他的结论是,奥斯曼帝国的政策更为灵活,事实证明土耳其人有能力维护他们在该地区的利益。与此同时,海峡问题并没有成为两个大国之间任何严重升级的原因。
{"title":"Russia, Turkey, and the Problem of the Black Sea Straits in 1898–1908","authors":"A. Boldyrev","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1586391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586391","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the main geopolitical problem in Russian—Ottoman relations at the turn of the twentieth century. Using ample archive sources the author shows the course of Russia’s struggle for influence in the straits. He concludes that the Ottoman policy was more flexible and the Turks proved able to assert their interests in the region. At the same time the straits question did not become the cause of any serious escalation between the two powers.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"162 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586391","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45045421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ottoman Empire and Russia in Light of Their Geopolitical Demarcation 从地缘政治划分看奥斯曼帝国与俄罗斯
Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1586389
S. Oreshkova
The article analyzes Russian—Ottoman relations from the territorial point of view. The author traces stages of these relations and shows how the attitudes of Russian power and society to the problem of southward expansion changed through centuries. She concludes that in the nineteenth century Russia ceased to be interested in the military solution of the “Eastern Question” and it was often the pressure of European international affairs that made the country wage war against its southern neighbor.
本文从领土的角度分析了俄鄂关系。作者追溯了这些关系的各个阶段,并展示了几个世纪以来俄罗斯权力和社会对向南扩张问题的态度是如何变化的。她得出的结论是,在19世纪,俄罗斯对军事解决“东方问题”不再感兴趣,而正是欧洲国际事务的压力使该国对其南部邻国发动了战争。
{"title":"The Ottoman Empire and Russia in Light of Their Geopolitical Demarcation","authors":"S. Oreshkova","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1586389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586389","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes Russian—Ottoman relations from the territorial point of view. The author traces stages of these relations and shows how the attitudes of Russian power and society to the problem of southward expansion changed through centuries. She concludes that in the nineteenth century Russia ceased to be interested in the military solution of the “Eastern Question” and it was often the pressure of European international affairs that made the country wage war against its southern neighbor.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"125 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586389","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44758029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Russia and the Ottoman Empire: The Geopolitical Dimension 俄罗斯与奥斯曼帝国:地缘政治维度
Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1586387
K. Fursov
Russian academic science recently has demonstrated growing interest in the relations between the Russian and the Ottoman Empires. The reasons are numerous: sharpened attention to Russia’s imperial past because of the demise of the Soviet Union; recent general progress of Turkic studies in Russia; present-day Turkey’s active foreign policy, which in some ways reminds us of the days of the Ottoman Empire; and Turkey’s political and military weight in the once more turbulent region of the Middle East. For imperial Russia the Ottoman Empire was always by far the most important of all Oriental polities it had to deal with. The relations with it were vital both for shaping Russia’s especially vulnerable southern borders and for emphasizing its unique position as the only Christian Orthodox empire. Whereas the Republic of Turkey is just one of six pretenders to the “core state” status in the Muslim world, the Ottoman Empire, because of its might and the combination of the Padishah and the Caliph in its ruler, was indeed a “core state” (S. Huntington) and the strongest of the three Muslim “gunpowder empires” (M. Hodgson), the others being Safavid Iran and Mughal India. Contacts between the two countries go back to the fifteenth century when the Ottoman Empire (Sultanate) became one of Muscovy’s main trading partners. Later the two empires turned into geopolitical rivals. The
俄罗斯学术界最近对俄罗斯和奥斯曼帝国之间的关系表现出越来越大的兴趣。原因有很多:由于苏联的解体,人们更加关注俄罗斯的帝国历史;俄罗斯突厥学研究的最新进展;如今土耳其积极的外交政策,在某种程度上让我们想起了奥斯曼帝国的时代;以及土耳其在再次动荡的中东地区的政治和军事影响力。对于俄罗斯帝国来说,奥斯曼帝国一直是它所要处理的所有东方政体中最重要的。与它的关系对于塑造俄罗斯特别脆弱的南部边境和强调其作为唯一基督教正统派帝国的独特地位至关重要。土耳其共和国只是穆斯林世界六个“核心国家”地位的觊觎者之一,而奥斯曼帝国,由于其实力以及其统治者中的帕迪沙和哈里发的结合,确实是一个“核心国”(S.Huntington),也是三个穆斯林“火药帝国”中最强大的一个(M.Hodgson),其他两个是萨非王朝的伊朗和莫卧儿王朝的印度。两国之间的联系可以追溯到15世纪,当时奥斯曼帝国(苏丹国)成为马斯科维的主要贸易伙伴之一。后来,这两个帝国变成了地缘政治上的对手。这个
{"title":"Russia and the Ottoman Empire: The Geopolitical Dimension","authors":"K. Fursov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1586387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586387","url":null,"abstract":"Russian academic science recently has demonstrated growing interest in the relations between the Russian and the Ottoman Empires. The reasons are numerous: sharpened attention to Russia’s imperial past because of the demise of the Soviet Union; recent general progress of Turkic studies in Russia; present-day Turkey’s active foreign policy, which in some ways reminds us of the days of the Ottoman Empire; and Turkey’s political and military weight in the once more turbulent region of the Middle East. For imperial Russia the Ottoman Empire was always by far the most important of all Oriental polities it had to deal with. The relations with it were vital both for shaping Russia’s especially vulnerable southern borders and for emphasizing its unique position as the only Christian Orthodox empire. Whereas the Republic of Turkey is just one of six pretenders to the “core state” status in the Muslim world, the Ottoman Empire, because of its might and the combination of the Padishah and the Caliph in its ruler, was indeed a “core state” (S. Huntington) and the strongest of the three Muslim “gunpowder empires” (M. Hodgson), the others being Safavid Iran and Mughal India. Contacts between the two countries go back to the fifteenth century when the Ottoman Empire (Sultanate) became one of Muscovy’s main trading partners. Later the two empires turned into geopolitical rivals. The","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"102 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586387","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43875913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Russia and the Islamic World 俄罗斯和伊斯兰世界
Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1586388
M. Meyer
This article offers a historical retrospective of the interactions between Russia and the Islamic world in all their diversity, beginning from the first trade contacts of Medieval Rus with the Arabs and Persians of the Abbasid era, as well as with the Turkic-speaking residents of Volga Bulgaria. The author concludes that except for the initial sporadic period, the connections between Russian and Muslim worlds have been stable and close throughout all the following periods. Moreover, with time, these two civilizational communities turned into communicating vessels because of the growing number of Muslims within the Russian State and in Russian society. Special attention is paid to Russian-Turkish relations across several centuries. A complete comprehension of the relations between Russia and the Islamic world through an example of the historical retrospective of Russian interactions with the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey helps to provide a full appreciation of the importance of joint efforts to secure a bridge connecting East and West and the oriental civilizations with Russia.
本文对俄罗斯和伊斯兰世界之间的各种互动进行了历史回顾,从中世纪俄罗斯与阿巴斯时代的阿拉伯人和波斯人以及伏尔加保加利亚讲突厥语的居民的第一次贸易接触开始。作者得出结论,除了最初的零星时期外,俄罗斯和穆斯林世界之间的联系在接下来的所有时期都是稳定和密切的。此外,随着时间的推移,由于俄罗斯国内和俄罗斯社会中穆斯林人数的不断增加,这两个文明社区变成了交流的容器。几个世纪以来,俄罗斯与土耳其的关系受到特别关注。以俄罗斯与奥斯曼帝国和土耳其共和国互动的历史回顾为例,全面了解俄罗斯与伊斯兰世界之间的关系,有助于充分认识到共同努力建立连接东西方和东方文明与俄罗斯的桥梁的重要性。
{"title":"Russia and the Islamic World","authors":"M. Meyer","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1586388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586388","url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a historical retrospective of the interactions between Russia and the Islamic world in all their diversity, beginning from the first trade contacts of Medieval Rus with the Arabs and Persians of the Abbasid era, as well as with the Turkic-speaking residents of Volga Bulgaria. The author concludes that except for the initial sporadic period, the connections between Russian and Muslim worlds have been stable and close throughout all the following periods. Moreover, with time, these two civilizational communities turned into communicating vessels because of the growing number of Muslims within the Russian State and in Russian society. Special attention is paid to Russian-Turkish relations across several centuries. A complete comprehension of the relations between Russia and the Islamic world through an example of the historical retrospective of Russian interactions with the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey helps to provide a full appreciation of the importance of joint efforts to secure a bridge connecting East and West and the oriental civilizations with Russia.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"103 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586388","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49111654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diplomatic Relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century 18世纪下半叶俄罗斯与奥斯曼帝国的外交关系
Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1586390
M. Yakushev
The diplomatic relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire of the second half of the eighteenth century are a crucial part of the foreign policy of both powers and represent one of the most important and interesting topics in European political history. This article is devoted to a study of the specifics of Russo-Ottoman diplomatic ties in the context of the evolution of international relations from the time of the ending of the Seven Years’ War (1756–1763) to the signing of the Peace Treaty of Jassy (1792).
18世纪下半叶俄罗斯与奥斯曼帝国的外交关系是两国外交政策的重要组成部分,也是欧洲政治史上最重要、最有趣的话题之一。本文致力于研究从七年战争(1756-1763)结束到《雅西和平条约》(1792)签署期间国际关系演变的背景下,俄罗斯-奥斯曼外交关系的具体情况。
{"title":"Diplomatic Relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire in the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century","authors":"M. Yakushev","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1586390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586390","url":null,"abstract":"The diplomatic relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire of the second half of the eighteenth century are a crucial part of the foreign policy of both powers and represent one of the most important and interesting topics in European political history. This article is devoted to a study of the specifics of Russo-Ottoman diplomatic ties in the context of the evolution of international relations from the time of the ending of the Seven Years’ War (1756–1763) to the signing of the Peace Treaty of Jassy (1792).","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"146 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1586390","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48249939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The “Propaganda Age” “宣传时代”
Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10611983.2018.1577098
I. Zhdanova
This article examines efforts to manage information in wartime Russia, with particular emphasis on revolutionary 1917. The author’s approach is informed by that of Western scholars, particularly Peter Holquist, using the term “surveillance” to discuss the modern state’s effort to mobilize its citizenry through information: gathering information about the population and enlightening the population through control of information. In 1917, the absence of civilian censorship aided the new authorities in learning much from the press, but the proliferation of press organs and worsening attitudes towards the war complicated their efforts to use the press to positively shape public opinion.
这篇文章考察了战时俄罗斯管理信息的努力,特别强调革命的1917年。作者的方法借鉴了西方学者,特别是彼得·霍尔奎斯特的方法,他使用“监视”一词来讨论现代国家通过信息动员公民的努力:收集有关人口的信息,并通过控制信息来启发人口。1917年,民间审查制度的缺失帮助新当局从新闻界学习了很多东西,但新闻机构的激增和对战争态度的恶化使他们利用新闻界积极塑造公众舆论的努力变得复杂。
{"title":"The “Propaganda Age”","authors":"I. Zhdanova","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2018.1577098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2018.1577098","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines efforts to manage information in wartime Russia, with particular emphasis on revolutionary 1917. The author’s approach is informed by that of Western scholars, particularly Peter Holquist, using the term “surveillance” to discuss the modern state’s effort to mobilize its citizenry through information: gathering information about the population and enlightening the population through control of information. In 1917, the absence of civilian censorship aided the new authorities in learning much from the press, but the proliferation of press organs and worsening attitudes towards the war complicated their efforts to use the press to positively shape public opinion.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"57 1","pages":"54 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2018.1577098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46163548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Russian studies in history
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1