Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is an important patient safety issue worldwide. In addition to understanding the required technical elements, addressing the socio-adaptive or behavioural elements of CAUTI prevention is also critical to ensure effective implementation and reduce the risk of patient harm.
{"title":"Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a happy marriage between implementation and healthier patients","authors":"Sarah L. Krein RN, PhD , Sanjay Saint MD, MPH","doi":"10.1071/HI13047","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13047","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is an important patient safety issue worldwide. In addition to understanding the required technical elements, addressing the socio-adaptive or behavioural elements of CAUTI prevention is also critical to ensure effective implementation and reduce the risk of patient harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59237339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria are pervasive in the long-term care population. Optimal management of urinary infection for residents of long-term care facilities requires knowledge of the unique features of the infection in this setting, together with critical evaluation of each episode of potential urinary infection in the individual resident.
Method
A non-structured review of current knowledge and recommendations relevant to urinary infection in long-term care facilities.
Results
Urinary infection is the second most common infection occurring in long-term care facility residents. For residents without chronic indwelling catheters, acute, localising, genitourinary symptoms should be present to support a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic infection. Inappropriate antimicrobial use for urinary tract infection, particularly treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and prophylaxis of urinary infection, is a consistent observation in reviews of antimicrobial use in these facilities. Management approaches to improve treatment include observation and reassessment when symptoms are questionable or the diagnosis is unclear, limiting the use of chronic indwelling catheters, and early identification of complications, such as obstruction, of indwelling catheters.
Conclusions
Clinical diagnostic imprecision and a high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria means these infections are overdiagnosed and overtreated, leading to adverse events from excess antimicrobial use. Antimicrobial stewardship programs to improve antimicrobial use for this indication need to be developed in long-term care facilities.
{"title":"Urinary tract infection in long-term care facilities","authors":"Lindsay E. Nicolle MD, FRCPC","doi":"10.1071/HI13043","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria are pervasive in the long-term care population. Optimal management of urinary infection for residents of long-term care facilities requires knowledge of the unique features of the infection in this setting, together with critical evaluation of each episode of potential urinary infection in the individual resident.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A non-structured review of current knowledge and recommendations relevant to urinary infection in long-term care facilities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Urinary infection is the second most common infection occurring in long-term care facility residents. For residents without chronic indwelling catheters, acute, localising, genitourinary symptoms should be present to support a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic infection. Inappropriate antimicrobial use for urinary tract infection, particularly treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and prophylaxis of urinary infection, is a consistent observation in reviews of antimicrobial use in these facilities. Management approaches to improve treatment include observation and reassessment when symptoms are questionable or the diagnosis is unclear, limiting the use of chronic indwelling catheters, and early identification of complications, such as obstruction, of indwelling catheters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical diagnostic imprecision and a high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria means these infections are overdiagnosed and overtreated, leading to adverse events from excess antimicrobial use. Antimicrobial stewardship programs to improve antimicrobial use for this indication need to be developed in long-term care facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59237485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
From an economics perspective, the question of whether the surveillance of urinary tract infection (UTI) is worthwhile depends on the returns we enjoy for the effort and cost required. Information on how long people spend doing it, how accurate the data are, how much rates are reduced as a consequence, how many costs are saved and what health benefits arise all play into a decision. It might be that traditional surveillance takes some time to undertake and is quite costly. So lower cost alternatives might be sought. Understanding the effectiveness is tricky but baseline data could be compared with post-implementation data to showwhat is happening. Anthony Harris wrote a good review of the methods for making these judgments. The cost savings depend on the bed days released and then how they are valued. Accounting costs do not tell us what the bed days are worth in alternate uses, but the hospital CEO might reveal what they arewilling to pay for the bed days freed up. Because of activity based funding this value might be zero. The health benefits are hard to value, but if progression to more serious secondary infection is avoided they could be large. It is reasonable to use existing data to predict changes to costs and changes to the number of cases of UTI. Much better to be prudent with the assumptions and then decision makers will take the work more seriously. Using biased studies to make unrealistic estimates of large and non-believable cost savings to the hospital is a dubious strategy. Reduced UTI rates may also have capital on their own as HAIs are now a barometer of quality for hospitals and this might be a simpler way of convincing budget holders to fund a program.Another argument is that prevention nowwill preserve antibiotic effectiveness into the future, but getting data to show this is very hard. Gram-negative resistance may mean that UTIs become more difficult and more expensive to treat. It could be that decision makers don’t put much weight on data, insteadusing their prior opinion andgut instinct to decide on what to do. If this is true then lobbying to change their preferences towards more infection control might work. If an economic rationale for UTI surveillance is developed then it is important to show what is foregone to do it. The opportunity cost of choosing to invest in a program is the real test of the value of the decision. There aremeagre resources for infection prevention and they should be invested wisely, wild goose chases for infection control are costly and should be avoided.
{"title":"The economics of UTI surveillance","authors":"Nicholas Graves PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI13046","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13046","url":null,"abstract":"From an economics perspective, the question of whether the surveillance of urinary tract infection (UTI) is worthwhile depends on the returns we enjoy for the effort and cost required. Information on how long people spend doing it, how accurate the data are, how much rates are reduced as a consequence, how many costs are saved and what health benefits arise all play into a decision. It might be that traditional surveillance takes some time to undertake and is quite costly. So lower cost alternatives might be sought. Understanding the effectiveness is tricky but baseline data could be compared with post-implementation data to showwhat is happening. Anthony Harris wrote a good review of the methods for making these judgments. The cost savings depend on the bed days released and then how they are valued. Accounting costs do not tell us what the bed days are worth in alternate uses, but the hospital CEO might reveal what they arewilling to pay for the bed days freed up. Because of activity based funding this value might be zero. The health benefits are hard to value, but if progression to more serious secondary infection is avoided they could be large. It is reasonable to use existing data to predict changes to costs and changes to the number of cases of UTI. Much better to be prudent with the assumptions and then decision makers will take the work more seriously. Using biased studies to make unrealistic estimates of large and non-believable cost savings to the hospital is a dubious strategy. Reduced UTI rates may also have capital on their own as HAIs are now a barometer of quality for hospitals and this might be a simpler way of convincing budget holders to fund a program.Another argument is that prevention nowwill preserve antibiotic effectiveness into the future, but getting data to show this is very hard. Gram-negative resistance may mean that UTIs become more difficult and more expensive to treat. It could be that decision makers don’t put much weight on data, insteadusing their prior opinion andgut instinct to decide on what to do. If this is true then lobbying to change their preferences towards more infection control might work. If an economic rationale for UTI surveillance is developed then it is important to show what is foregone to do it. The opportunity cost of choosing to invest in a program is the real test of the value of the decision. There aremeagre resources for infection prevention and they should be invested wisely, wild goose chases for infection control are costly and should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 1","pages":"Page 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59237668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Moi Lin Ling MBBS, FRCPA, CPHQ, MBA , Kue Bien How BSc(Nursing), CIC
Background
This paper describes an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAE) that occurred in a haematology ward between 8 January and 24 March 2009. Four patients had healthcare-associated infections due to PAE which was recovered in the groin, blood and perianal tissue.
Aim
This report highlights the risks associated with the use of sinks and outlines the approach used to manage the outbreak.
Methods
Subsequent investigations showed that a contaminated sink drainage system represented the possible source of spread. Of a total of 21 environmental samples taken, two samples from the sink drainage system showed a similar susceptibility pattern as the patients involved in the outbreak. Four cycles of disinfection of the sink drainage systems were attempted with various modalities.
Findings
PAE contamination of the sink drains at the multiple grooves in the drains proved difficult to disinfect adequately, despite using several cleaning protocols. The outbreak was finally terminated following a change in the sink drainage system to one without grooves, hence preventing any further PAE colonisation.
Conclusion
Our experience demonstrated that the design of the sink drainage system may be a potential source of PAE contamination for an immunocompromised patient.
{"title":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak linked to sink drainage design","authors":"Moi Lin Ling MBBS, FRCPA, CPHQ, MBA , Kue Bien How BSc(Nursing), CIC","doi":"10.1071/HI13015","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This paper describes an outbreak of <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (PAE) that occurred in a haematology ward between 8 January and 24 March 2009. Four patients had healthcare-associated infections due to PAE which was recovered in the groin, blood and perianal tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This report highlights the risks associated with the use of sinks and outlines the approach used to manage the outbreak.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subsequent investigations showed that a contaminated sink drainage system represented the possible source of spread. Of a total of 21 environmental samples taken, two samples from the sink drainage system showed a similar susceptibility pattern as the patients involved in the outbreak. Four cycles of disinfection of the sink drainage systems were attempted with various modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>PAE contamination of the sink drains at the multiple grooves in the drains proved difficult to disinfect adequately, despite using several cleaning protocols. The outbreak was finally terminated following a change in the sink drainage system to one without grooves, hence preventing any further PAE colonisation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our experience demonstrated that the design of the sink drainage system may be a potential source of PAE contamination for an immunocompromised patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 143-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59236041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Noroviruses account for over 90% of all viral gastroenteritis cases and ~50% of all outbreaks worldwide. Each year in Australia, there are an estimated 1.8 million cases. Casesmaybe sporadic or part of outbreaks, occurring in either the community or healthcare setting. Outbreaks are associated with significant morbidity and some mortality. They incur substantial costs and can be difficult to control in healthcare institutions or other closed settings.
Multiple factors (related to virus biological properties, human immune responses or inadequate management modalities) make it a challenging pathogen to control. They include: multiple transmission routes, low infectious dose, environmental survival, spread and persistence, diagnostic difficulty, hand hygiene controversies, imperfect immunity and immune evasion, asymptomatic and prolonged shedding, lack of vaccine and lack of antiviral treatment. The purpose of this article is to promote a better understanding of these factors in order that health professionals may be better equipped to manage the problems posed by noroviruses.
Until large-scale effective vaccination and specific treatments become available, the safeguarding of food and water supplies and the rigorous and timely application of outbreak management and infection control measures will remain the key to norovirus disease prevention and control.
{"title":"Norovirus: a challenging pathogen","authors":"Chong W. Ong MBBS(Hons), FRACP, FRCPA","doi":"10.1071/HI13016","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Noroviruses account for over 90% of all viral gastroenteritis cases and ~50% of all outbreaks worldwide. Each year in Australia, there are an estimated 1.8 million cases. Casesmaybe sporadic or part of outbreaks, occurring in either the community or healthcare setting. Outbreaks are associated with significant morbidity and some mortality. They incur substantial costs and can be difficult to control in healthcare institutions or other closed settings.</p><p>Multiple factors (related to virus biological properties, human immune responses or inadequate management modalities) make it a challenging pathogen to control. They include: multiple transmission routes, low infectious dose, environmental survival, spread and persistence, diagnostic difficulty, hand hygiene controversies, imperfect immunity and immune evasion, asymptomatic and prolonged shedding, lack of vaccine and lack of antiviral treatment. The purpose of this article is to promote a better understanding of these factors in order that health professionals may be better equipped to manage the problems posed by noroviruses.</p><p>Until large-scale effective vaccination and specific treatments become available, the safeguarding of food and water supplies and the rigorous and timely application of outbreak management and infection control measures will remain the key to norovirus disease prevention and control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59236094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maura P. Smiddy RGN, RM, MPH , Olive M. Murphy MB BCh BAO, FRCPI, FFPath (RCPI)
Background
Healthcare-associated infections contribute greatly to the global burden of morbidity and mortality in relation to infectious disease. Consequences impact on individuals, populations and health services. Surveillance of infection provides the information to lead infection prevention activities. However, surveillance can require a significant resource investment by healthcare organisations. Point prevalence surveys of healthcareassociated infections are a useful surveillance methodology where resources are limited. Findings provide information in relation to infection and also in relation to patient risk factors.
Methods
Repeated point prevalence surveys were implemented over 4 years in 2006–09 in a 345-bed acute private hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Each annual survey followed an unchanged methodology and the data were collected and analysed by the infection prevention and control team.
Results
The prevalence of hospital-acquired infection ranged from 1.1% to 4.4% with a mean value of 3.2% (CI: 2.09–4.62). Mean prevalence of invasive devices was as follows: peripheral venous catheters: 61.3%; urinary catheters: 19.4%; and central venous catheters: 3.9%. The findings of the studies indicated the high prevalence of risk factors associated with invasive devices, particularly peripheral venous catheters. The results supported the introduction of a bundled approach to patient care in relation to invasive devices. This integrated the use of ‘care bundles’ or checklists into daily patient care and management.
Conclusion
A multidisciplinary approach incorporating ward staff in relation to documentation and auditing of compliance with the bundle has increased awareness regarding the risks of invasive devices and the importance of infection prevention strategies.
{"title":"The use of point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infection to identify risk factors and facilitate infection prevention and control planning","authors":"Maura P. Smiddy RGN, RM, MPH , Olive M. Murphy MB BCh BAO, FRCPI, FFPath (RCPI)","doi":"10.1071/HI13022","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Healthcare-associated infections contribute greatly to the global burden of morbidity and mortality in relation to infectious disease. Consequences impact on individuals, populations and health services. Surveillance of infection provides the information to lead infection prevention activities. However, surveillance can require a significant resource investment by healthcare organisations. Point prevalence surveys of healthcareassociated infections are a useful surveillance methodology where resources are limited. Findings provide information in relation to infection and also in relation to patient risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Repeated point prevalence surveys were implemented over 4 years in 2006–09 in a 345-bed acute private hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Each annual survey followed an unchanged methodology and the data were collected and analysed by the infection prevention and control team.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of hospital-acquired infection ranged from 1.1% to 4.4% with a mean value of 3.2% (CI: 2.09–4.62). Mean prevalence of invasive devices was as follows: peripheral venous catheters: 61.3%; urinary catheters: 19.4%; and central venous catheters: 3.9%. The findings of the studies indicated the high prevalence of risk factors associated with invasive devices, particularly peripheral venous catheters. The results supported the introduction of a bundled approach to patient care in relation to invasive devices. This integrated the use of ‘care bundles’ or checklists into daily patient care and management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multidisciplinary approach incorporating ward staff in relation to documentation and auditing of compliance with the bundle has increased awareness regarding the risks of invasive devices and the importance of infection prevention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 162-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59236005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J.T. Freeman MBChB, PGDipID, FRCPA , S. Gormack , M.N. De Almeida MBChB , S.A. Roberts MBCHB, FRCPA, FRACP
Patients colonised with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) pose a risk to other hospitalised patients and additional measures such as contact precautions are often used. For patients clearing colonisation, however, such measures are unjustified. We reviewed data from a large-scale active surveillance program for ESBL-E to describe the natural history of colonisation. Of 124 colonised patients with sequential rectal swabs, 32 (25.8%) cleared colonisation. Kaplan–Meier analysis suggested that 75% of patients remained colonised at 1 year and that the median duration of colonisation was ~3 years. Improved understanding of the natural history of ESBL-E colonisation will allow more rational approaches to managing previously colonised patients. Additional keywords: duration of colonisation, extended-spectrumbeta-lactamase, natural history of colonisation.
{"title":"Natural history of rectal colonisation with extended- spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: a retrospective review with up to 6 years of follow-up","authors":"J.T. Freeman MBChB, PGDipID, FRCPA , S. Gormack , M.N. De Almeida MBChB , S.A. Roberts MBCHB, FRCPA, FRACP","doi":"10.1071/HI13013","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients colonised with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) pose a risk to other hospitalised patients and additional measures such as contact precautions are often used. For patients clearing colonisation, however, such measures are unjustified. We reviewed data from a large-scale active surveillance program for ESBL-E to describe the natural history of colonisation. Of 124 colonised patients with sequential rectal swabs, 32 (25.8%) cleared colonisation. Kaplan–Meier analysis suggested that 75% of patients remained colonised at 1 year and that the median duration of colonisation was ~3 years. Improved understanding of the natural history of ESBL-E colonisation will allow more rational approaches to managing previously colonised patients. Additional keywords: duration of colonisation, extended-spectrumbeta-lactamase, natural history of colonisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 152-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare-acquired infections are a major source of morbidity and mortality in people living in residential aged care facilities. Compliance with hand hygiene by healthcare workers can reduce the risk of infection to residents, yet compliance rates are generally low. Infection-control advocates within the aged care sector are looking to conduct programs to improve rates among their staff. This review was conducted to identify a reproducible intervention to improve staff hand hygiene compliance within an Australian residential aged care facility.
Method
Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for combinations of ‘hand hygiene’, ‘hand washing’, ‘residential aged care facility’, ‘aged care’, ‘nursing home’ and ‘long-term care facility’ from 2000 to current. Articles were excluded if the information was not clearly stated as pertaining to a residential aged care facility or if the data investigated staff knowledge or perceptions of hand hygiene.
Results
Most of the five articles included in the review reported an improvement in compliance rates. Studies were multimodal, had an education or training component, and included the promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs. Several used aspects of the World Health Organization's hand hygiene initiatives. Compliance audit tools across the studies were not consistent; thus, results may not be comparable.
Conclusion
There are few published studies which report interventions that improve hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers within residential aged care facilities. Successful studies included the promotion of alcoholbased hand rubs. More research is needed to improve hand hygiene compliance in the aged care sector.
{"title":"The search for an evidence-based intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance in a residential aged care facility","authors":"Gail Abernethy BHealth, PGDPHTM, GCHSt , Wendy Smyth MAppSc, MBus, PhD","doi":"10.1071/HI13021","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Healthcare-acquired infections are a major source of morbidity and mortality in people living in residential aged care facilities. Compliance with hand hygiene by healthcare workers can reduce the risk of infection to residents, yet compliance rates are generally low. Infection-control advocates within the aged care sector are looking to conduct programs to improve rates among their staff. This review was conducted to identify a reproducible intervention to improve staff hand hygiene compliance within an Australian residential aged care facility.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for combinations of ‘hand hygiene’, ‘hand washing’, ‘residential aged care facility’, ‘aged care’, ‘nursing home’ and ‘long-term care facility’ from 2000 to current. Articles were excluded if the information was not clearly stated as pertaining to a residential aged care facility or if the data investigated staff knowledge or perceptions of hand hygiene.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the five articles included in the review reported an improvement in compliance rates. Studies were multimodal, had an education or training component, and included the promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs. Several used aspects of the World Health Organization's hand hygiene initiatives. Compliance audit tools across the studies were not consistent; thus, results may not be comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are few published studies which report interventions that improve hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers within residential aged care facilities. Successful studies included the promotion of alcoholbased hand rubs. More research is needed to improve hand hygiene compliance in the aged care sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health issue influenced by inappropriate prescribing and use. In Australia the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in hospital, nursing home and community settings is on the rise. To address this issue, a 5-year program focuses on reducing the prescribing and inappropriate use of antibiotics. In order to inform development of the program, a cross-sectional survey was conducted.
Methods
The survey was sent to a random sample of 1570 Australian general practitioners (GPs), and data was collected on GP knowledge, attitudes, awareness and self-reported behaviour in relation to antibiotic resistance, medical imaging referrals and antibiotic prescribing.
Results
730 GPs participated in the survey (46.5% response rate). While GPs perform very well in many areas, especially in recommending symptomatic management rather than prescribing an antibiotic, there is some possible confusion amongstGPs about the factors that increase antibiotic resistance. The results showed that patient expectation also plays a role in the decision to prescribe antibiotics, with almost 40% of respondents admitting that they would prescribe antibiotics to meet a patient's expectations. Antibiotic resistance is generally not discussed with patients (only half [50%] of respondents would always or often discuss the issue of antibiotic resistance).
Conclusion
Programs to address the prescribing of antibiotics must be informed by existing knowledge, attitudes, awareness and practice of GPs. There is room for improvement in GPs’ knowledge of prescribing behaviours that decrease antibiotic resistance. GPs should be encouraged to discuss the issue of antibiotic resistance with patients and to not provide an antibiotic prescription to be dispensed at a later date or to meet patient expectation.
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance and prescribing in Australia: current attitudes and practice of GPs","authors":"Rachel Hardy-Holbrook PhD , Svetlana Aristidi MD, BBs, dipPH , Vandana Chandnani MPH , Daisy DeWindt MHL , Kathryn Dinh MIPH","doi":"10.1071/HI13019","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health issue influenced by inappropriate prescribing and use. In Australia the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in hospital, nursing home and community settings is on the rise. To address this issue, a 5-year program focuses on reducing the prescribing and inappropriate use of antibiotics. In order to inform development of the program, a cross-sectional survey was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The survey was sent to a random sample of 1570 Australian general practitioners (GPs), and data was collected on GP knowledge, attitudes, awareness and self-reported behaviour in relation to antibiotic resistance, medical imaging referrals and antibiotic prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>730 GPs participated in the survey (46.5% response rate). While GPs perform very well in many areas, especially in recommending symptomatic management rather than prescribing an antibiotic, there is some possible confusion amongstGPs about the factors that increase antibiotic resistance. The results showed that patient expectation also plays a role in the decision to prescribe antibiotics, with almost 40% of respondents admitting that they would prescribe antibiotics to meet a patient's expectations. Antibiotic resistance is generally not discussed with patients (only half [50%] of respondents would always or often discuss the issue of antibiotic resistance).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Programs to address the prescribing of antibiotics must be informed by existing knowledge, attitudes, awareness and practice of GPs. There is room for improvement in GPs’ knowledge of prescribing behaviours that decrease antibiotic resistance. GPs should be encouraged to discuss the issue of antibiotic resistance with patients and to not provide an antibiotic prescription to be dispensed at a later date or to meet patient expectation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 147-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59235765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brett G. Mitchell , Stephanie J. Dancer , Ramon Z. Shaban , Nicholas Graves
Brett G. Mitchell Stephanie J. Dancer Ramon Z. Shaban Nicholas Graves Avondale College, Faculty of Nursing and Health, Cooranbong, Australia. Australian Catholic University, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Dickson, Australia. Department of Microbiology, NHS Lanarkshire, United Kingdom. Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University. Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Corresponding author. Email: brett.mitchell@avondale.edu.au
Brett G. Mitchell Stephanie J. Dancer Ramon Z. Shaban Nicholas Graves Avondale学院护理与健康学院,澳大利亚Cooranbong。澳大利亚天主教大学护理、助产和辅助医学学院,迪克森,澳大利亚。英国拉纳克郡NHS微生物学系。格里菲斯大学格里菲斯卫生研究所卫生实践创新中心。澳大利亚昆士兰科技大学健康生物医学创新研究所。相应的作者。电子邮件:brett.mitchell@avondale.edu.au
{"title":"Scholarly writing, peer-review and quality papers for Healthcare Infection","authors":"Brett G. Mitchell , Stephanie J. Dancer , Ramon Z. Shaban , Nicholas Graves","doi":"10.1071/HI13026","DOIUrl":"10.1071/HI13026","url":null,"abstract":"Brett G. Mitchell Stephanie J. Dancer Ramon Z. Shaban Nicholas Graves Avondale College, Faculty of Nursing and Health, Cooranbong, Australia. Australian Catholic University, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Dickson, Australia. Department of Microbiology, NHS Lanarkshire, United Kingdom. Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University. Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Corresponding author. Email: brett.mitchell@avondale.edu.au","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 131-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI13026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59236069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}