首页 > 最新文献

Psychiatric bulletin (2014)最新文献

英文 中文
Authors' response. 作者的回应。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.2.88a
Philip J Cowen, Daniel Whiting
{"title":"Authors' response.","authors":"Philip J Cowen, Daniel Whiting","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.2.88a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.2.88a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.2.88a","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should psychology be 'positive'? Letting the philosophers speak: Commentary on... Hope, optimism and delusion. 心理学应该是“积极的”吗?让哲学家说话:评论……希望、乐观和妄想。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045823
Femi Oyebode

This is a brief commentary on the value of optimism in therapy. It draws on the philosophical writings of Schopenhauer and Aristotle. It suggests that the modern preoccupation with optimism may be as extreme as the bleak pessimistic outlook favoured by Schopenhauer.

这是对乐观在治疗中的价值的简短评论。它借鉴了叔本华和亚里士多德的哲学著作。它表明,现代人对乐观主义的关注可能与叔本华所推崇的悲观前景一样极端。
{"title":"Should psychology be 'positive'? Letting the philosophers speak: Commentary on... Hope, optimism and delusion.","authors":"Femi Oyebode","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a brief commentary on the value of optimism in therapy. It draws on the philosophical writings of Schopenhauer and Aristotle. It suggests that the modern preoccupation with optimism may be as extreme as the bleak pessimistic outlook favoured by Schopenhauer. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"52-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045823","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32680595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Agomelatine - is it another reboxetine? Another case of publication bias. 阿戈美拉汀是另一种瑞波西汀吗?这又是一个发表偏见的例子。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.2.88
Sumeet Gupta
I read the special article about agomelatine with interest.1 The authors state that controlled studies have suggested a favourable efficacy and tolerability profile of agomelatine in depression. This statement is not entirely accurate.
{"title":"Agomelatine - is it another reboxetine? Another case of publication bias.","authors":"Sumeet Gupta","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.2.88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.2.88","url":null,"abstract":"I read the special article about agomelatine with interest.1 The authors state that controlled studies have suggested a favourable efficacy and tolerability profile of agomelatine in depression. This statement is not entirely accurate.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.2.88","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Research ethics approval and discrimination. 研究伦理的批准和歧视。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.2.89
Louise McCarthy, Vijaykumar Harbishettar, Albert Michael
We read with envy Galappathie et al’s study1 of detained patients’ awareness of the mental health review tribunal (MHRT). We applaud their decision to regard their study as part of service evaluation rather than as a research project requiring National Research Ethics Service Committee (NRESC) approval. We applied for NRESC approval for a study asking patients detained under Section 2 or Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 about their views on the chances of the MHRT rescinding their detention if they appealed. The crucial question was ‘What do you think are the chances that you will be discharged by the Tribunal if you appeal?’ The NRESC which reviewed the application did not have a mental health patients’ representative, carers’ representative or mental health professional as its member. Therefore, it sought expert opinion from a retired clinical psychologist. The NRESC ruled that ‘the study should not be done in the acute phase of treatment when participants are detained and it would be more appropriate once they have been discharged. This would remove concerns about the ability of the participants to give informed consent whilst under detention and in a vulnerable condition’. We appealed against the decision and our application was referred to another NRESC which also did not have a mental health patients’ representative or carers’ representative, but had a psychologist as a member. We attended the review and explained that we endeavoured to assess detained patients’ views and that post-discharge retrospective assessment would be futile. We argued that the first principle of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is the presumption of capacity. The General Medical Council guidance also states that one must not assume that a patient lacks capacity to make a decision solely because of their medical condition, including mental illness. We confirmed that patients who did not have capacity to decide whether to take part in the study will not be offered the opportunity to take part. This second NRESC agreed with the first one for the same reasons, that is, detained patients don’t have capacity to decide whether to take part in the study. This is an example of ignorance and consequent stigmatising attitudes held by those in authority, resulting in discrimination against mental health patients, carers and professionals. Members of NRESCs believing that those who are mentally ill lack the capacity to make simple decisions could significantly hamper research into mental illness and perpetuate the myth that psychiatry is the most unscientific medical specialty. Mental health professionals and patient groups may share part of the blame by not representing themselves on NRESCs.
{"title":"Research ethics approval and discrimination.","authors":"Louise McCarthy,&nbsp;Vijaykumar Harbishettar,&nbsp;Albert Michael","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.2.89","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.2.89","url":null,"abstract":"We read with envy Galappathie et al’s study1 of detained patients’ awareness of the mental health review tribunal (MHRT). We applaud their decision to regard their study as part of service evaluation rather than as a research project requiring National Research Ethics Service Committee (NRESC) approval. \u0000 \u0000We applied for NRESC approval for a study asking patients detained under Section 2 or Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 about their views on the chances of the MHRT rescinding their detention if they appealed. The crucial question was ‘What do you think are the chances that you will be discharged by the Tribunal if you appeal?’ \u0000 \u0000The NRESC which reviewed the application did not have a mental health patients’ representative, carers’ representative or mental health professional as its member. Therefore, it sought expert opinion from a retired clinical psychologist. The NRESC ruled that ‘the study should not be done in the acute phase of treatment when participants are detained and it would be more appropriate once they have been discharged. This would remove concerns about the ability of the participants to give informed consent whilst under detention and in a vulnerable condition’. \u0000 \u0000We appealed against the decision and our application was referred to another NRESC which also did not have a mental health patients’ representative or carers’ representative, but had a psychologist as a member. We attended the review and explained that we endeavoured to assess detained patients’ views and that post-discharge retrospective assessment would be futile. We argued that the first principle of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is the presumption of capacity. The General Medical Council guidance also states that one must not assume that a patient lacks capacity to make a decision solely because of their medical condition, including mental illness. We confirmed that patients who did not have capacity to decide whether to take part in the study will not be offered the opportunity to take part. This second NRESC agreed with the first one for the same reasons, that is, detained patients don’t have capacity to decide whether to take part in the study. \u0000 \u0000This is an example of ignorance and consequent stigmatising attitudes held by those in authority, resulting in discrimination against mental health patients, carers and professionals. Members of NRESCs believing that those who are mentally ill lack the capacity to make simple decisions could significantly hamper research into mental illness and perpetuate the myth that psychiatry is the most unscientific medical specialty. Mental health professionals and patient groups may share part of the blame by not representing themselves on NRESCs.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.2.89","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: ethical tensions. 将暴力风险评估作为一种医疗干预措施:伦理矛盾。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.043315
Ashimesh Roychowdhury, Gwen Adshead

Risk assessment differs from other medical interventions in that the welfare of the patient is not the immediate object of the intervention. However, improving the risk assessment process may reduce the chance of risk assessment itself being unjust. We explore the ethical arguments in relation to risk assessment as a medical intervention, drawing analogies, where applicable, with ethical arguments raised by general medical investigations. The article concludes by supporting the structured professional judgement approach as a method of risk assessment that is most consistent with the respect for principles of medical ethics. Recommendations are made for the future direction of risk assessment indicated by ethical theory.

风险评估与其他医疗干预措施不同,病人的福利不是干预措施的直接目标。然而,改进风险评估程序可以减少风险评估本身不公正的可能性。我们探讨了与风险评估作为一种医疗干预有关的伦理论点,并在适当的地方与一般医学调查提出的伦理论点进行了类比。文章最后支持将结构化专业判断方法作为最符合医学伦理原则的风险评估方法。文章还就伦理理论所指明的风险评估的未来方向提出了建议。
{"title":"Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: ethical tensions.","authors":"Ashimesh Roychowdhury, Gwen Adshead","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.043315","DOIUrl":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.043315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk assessment differs from other medical interventions in that the welfare of the patient is not the immediate object of the intervention. However, improving the risk assessment process may reduce the chance of risk assessment itself being unjust. We explore the ethical arguments in relation to risk assessment as a medical intervention, drawing analogies, where applicable, with ethical arguments raised by general medical investigations. The article concludes by supporting the structured professional judgement approach as a method of risk assessment that is most consistent with the respect for principles of medical ethics. Recommendations are made for the future direction of risk assessment indicated by ethical theory. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115407/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delayed discharges in an urban in-patient mental health service in England. 在英格兰的一个城市住院病人心理健康服务延迟出院。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.043083
Rob Poole, Alison Pearsall, Tony Ryan

Aims and method To describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of all in-patients experiencing delayed discharge over 3 months in an English urban mental health National Health Service trust. We carried out a cross-sectional case record study with care coordinator questionnaire. Results Overall, 67 in-patients with delayed discharge occupied 18.6% of acute beds. Older in-patients were White, diagnosed with dementia and experienced relatively short admissions. Younger in-patients were often of Black and minority ethnic background with a psychotic diagnosis and long service contact, and sometimes experienced very long admissions. They were similar to a long-stay comparison group. The whole cohort was socially isolated and marginalised, and frequently misused alcohol. Clinical implications People with complex mental health problems can experience long stays in acute care settings. This particularly affects people with psychosis who are isolated in the community. Alcohol misuse is the most common complicating factor. There are insufficient community-oriented rehabilitation services to meet these patients' diverse needs.

目的和方法描述英国城市精神卫生国民健康服务信托中所有延迟出院超过3个月的住院患者的临床和人口学特征。我们采用护理协调员问卷进行横断面病例记录研究。结果67例住院患者延迟出院,占急性床位18.6%。年龄较大的住院患者是白人,被诊断患有痴呆症,住院时间相对较短。年轻的住院病人通常是黑人和少数民族背景,他们被诊断为精神病,长期服务,有时住院时间很长。他们与长期居住的对照组相似。整个队列在社会上被孤立和边缘化,并且经常滥用酒精。临床意义患有复杂精神健康问题的人可能会在急性护理机构长期住院。这尤其影响到在社区中被孤立的精神病患者。酒精滥用是最常见的复杂因素。社区康复服务不足以满足这些病人不同的需要。
{"title":"Delayed discharges in an urban in-patient mental health service in England.","authors":"Rob Poole,&nbsp;Alison Pearsall,&nbsp;Tony Ryan","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.043083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.043083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method To describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of all in-patients experiencing delayed discharge over 3 months in an English urban mental health National Health Service trust. We carried out a cross-sectional case record study with care coordinator questionnaire. Results Overall, 67 in-patients with delayed discharge occupied 18.6% of acute beds. Older in-patients were White, diagnosed with dementia and experienced relatively short admissions. Younger in-patients were often of Black and minority ethnic background with a psychotic diagnosis and long service contact, and sometimes experienced very long admissions. They were similar to a long-stay comparison group. The whole cohort was socially isolated and marginalised, and frequently misused alcohol. Clinical implications People with complex mental health problems can experience long stays in acute care settings. This particularly affects people with psychosis who are isolated in the community. Alcohol misuse is the most common complicating factor. There are insufficient community-oriented rehabilitation services to meet these patients' diverse needs. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"66-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.043083","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Not everything that counts can be counted and not everything that can be counted counts. 不是所有有价值的东西都能被计算,也不是所有能被计算的东西都有价值。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.2.86b
Salwa Khalil
In their excellent paper, Bekas & Michev1 present a sober assessment of the inherent weakness of the Mental Health Clustering Tool and ICD-10 coding. Although clustering has already been used for many years in acute care, what is suitable for acute care is not necessary applicable to psychiatry. We are expected to cluster patients with similar symptoms, needs and disabilities in 21 clusters which are used as the basis for financial funding. However, subjectivity in psychiatry is a fact and it does not really matter how many tools and scales we implement to change this. The chance of subjectivity may be reduced but never eliminated. Diagnosis and formulations vary between clinicians within the same profession and even between members of the same team. One can identify quite easily a sizeable number of patients with an ever-changing diagnosis over a number of admissions. It follows that clustering is not a static tag but a changeable process that ought to be regularly updated. I agree wholeheartedly with Bekas & Michev that the final arbiter should be clinical judgement. It is not uncommon practice for clinicians such as myself to override the cluster concluded by other members of the team, relying on and trusting my clinical judgement.
{"title":"Not everything that counts can be counted and not everything that can be counted counts.","authors":"Salwa Khalil","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.2.86b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.2.86b","url":null,"abstract":"In their excellent paper, Bekas & Michev1 present a sober assessment of the inherent weakness of the Mental Health Clustering Tool and ICD-10 coding. Although clustering has already been used for many years in acute care, what is suitable for acute care is not necessary applicable to psychiatry. We are expected to cluster patients with similar symptoms, needs and disabilities in 21 clusters which are used as the basis for financial funding. \u0000 \u0000However, subjectivity in psychiatry is a fact and it does not really matter how many tools and scales we implement to change this. The chance of subjectivity may be reduced but never eliminated. Diagnosis and formulations vary between clinicians within the same profession and even between members of the same team. One can identify quite easily a sizeable number of patients with an ever-changing diagnosis over a number of admissions. It follows that clustering is not a static tag but a changeable process that ought to be regularly updated. \u0000 \u0000I agree wholeheartedly with Bekas & Michev that the final arbiter should be clinical judgement. It is not uncommon practice for clinicians such as myself to override the cluster concluded by other members of the team, relying on and trusting my clinical judgement.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.2.86b","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Unfair playing field. 不公平的竞争环境。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.2.87
Michael Fitzgerald
I fully agree with the change of the name of The Psychiatrist to the Psychiatric Bulletin.1 The phrase ‘unfair playing field’ is very important. For the past 50 years in psychiatric publishing it would appear that there were serious conflicts of interest not declared. For example, an editor and reviewers have reviewed papers where they are competing for research funds in the same areas as the papers submitted. In addition, many of these same people have been on committees deciding on funding for research in the same area as the paper that is being submitted or have other associations with the authors of the paper of one kind or another. Serious conflicts of interest particularly related to the ‘golden circle’ of people who are both editors, submitters of papers and on funding bodies. This controls what is allowed to be published and what topics are allowed to be funded and has damaged research and publication in the past 50 years. In a way it seems as if ‘might is right’ - the mighty being inside the golden publishing circle. It would be interesting for somebody to do a review of publications in psychiatry journals for the past 50 years to see where these conflicts of interest occurred and were undeclared. It is probably a more sociological task.
{"title":"Unfair playing field.","authors":"Michael Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.2.87","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.2.87","url":null,"abstract":"I fully agree with the change of the name of The Psychiatrist to the Psychiatric Bulletin.1 The phrase ‘unfair playing field’ is very important. For the past 50 years in psychiatric publishing it would appear that there were serious conflicts of interest not declared. For example, an editor and reviewers have reviewed papers where they are competing for research funds in the same areas as the papers submitted. In addition, many of these same people have been on committees deciding on funding for research in the same area as the paper that is being submitted or have other associations with the authors of the paper of one kind or another. Serious conflicts of interest particularly related to the ‘golden circle’ of people who are both editors, submitters of papers and on funding bodies. This controls what is allowed to be published and what topics are allowed to be funded and has damaged research and publication in the past 50 years. In a way it seems as if ‘might is right’ - the mighty being inside the golden publishing circle. It would be interesting for somebody to do a review of publications in psychiatry journals for the past 50 years to see where these conflicts of interest occurred and were undeclared. It is probably a more sociological task.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.2.87","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32681069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevention and Management of Violence: Guidance for Mental Healthcare Professionals 暴力的预防和管理:精神保健专业人员指南
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/PB.BP.113.045468
Matthew S. Tovey
Prevention and Management of Violence: Guidance for Mental Healthcare Professionals Edited by Masum Khwaja, & Dominic Beer RCPsych Publications, 2013, £20.00 (pb), 144 pp. ISBN: 9781908020956 Violence is always a consideration for anyone working in the field of mental health. The remit of this
暴力的预防和管理:心理保健专业人员的指导,Masum Khwaja和Dominic Beer编辑RCPsych出版社,2013,£20.00 (pb), 144页。ISBN: 9781908020956暴力一直是任何在心理健康领域工作的人都要考虑的问题。这个的范围
{"title":"Prevention and Management of Violence: Guidance for Mental Healthcare Professionals","authors":"Matthew S. Tovey","doi":"10.1192/PB.BP.113.045468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.BP.113.045468","url":null,"abstract":"Prevention and Management of Violence: Guidance for Mental Healthcare Professionals Edited by Masum Khwaja, & Dominic Beer RCPsych Publications, 2013, £20.00 (pb), 144 pp. ISBN: 9781908020956 \u0000\u0000Violence is always a consideration for anyone working in the field of mental health. The remit of this","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 1","pages":"94-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/PB.BP.113.045468","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66555890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Hope, optimism and delusion. 希望、乐观和妄想。
Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044438
Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus

Optimism is generally accepted by psychiatrists, psychologists and other caring professionals as a feature of mental health. Interventions typically rely on cognitive-behavioural tools to encourage individuals to 'stop negative thought cycles' and to 'challenge unhelpful thoughts'. However, evidence suggests that most individuals have persistent biases of optimism and that excessive optimism is not conducive to mental health. How helpful is it to facilitate optimism in individuals who are likely to exhibit biases of optimism already? By locating the cause of distress at the individual level and 'unhelpful' cognitions, does this minimise wider systemic social and economic influences on mental health?

精神科医生、心理学家和其他护理专业人员普遍认为乐观是心理健康的一个特征。干预通常依靠认知行为工具来鼓励个人“停止消极的思维循环”和“挑战无益的想法”。然而,有证据表明,大多数人都有持久的乐观偏见,过度乐观不利于心理健康。对那些可能已经表现出乐观偏见的人来说,促进乐观有多大帮助?通过将痛苦的原因定位在个人层面和“无益”的认知,这是否能最大限度地减少对心理健康的更广泛的系统性社会和经济影响?
{"title":"Hope, optimism and delusion.","authors":"Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.044438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.044438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimism is generally accepted by psychiatrists, psychologists and other caring professionals as a feature of mental health. Interventions typically rely on cognitive-behavioural tools to encourage individuals to 'stop negative thought cycles' and to 'challenge unhelpful thoughts'. However, evidence suggests that most individuals have persistent biases of optimism and that excessive optimism is not conducive to mental health. How helpful is it to facilitate optimism in individuals who are likely to exhibit biases of optimism already? By locating the cause of distress at the individual level and 'unhelpful' cognitions, does this minimise wider systemic social and economic influences on mental health? </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"49-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.044438","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32680594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
期刊
Psychiatric bulletin (2014)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1