首页 > 最新文献

UCLA criminal justice law review最新文献

英文 中文
Investigating Algorithmic Risk and Race 调查算法风险和种族
Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.5070/cj85154807
Melissa Hamilton
Author(s): Hamilton, Melissa | Abstract: Risk assessment algorithms lie at the heart of criminal justice reform to tackle mass incarceration. The newest application of risk tools centers on the pretrial stage as a means to reduce both reliance upon wealth-based bail systems and rates of pretrial detention. Yet the ability of risk assessment to achieve the reform movement’s goals will be challengedif the risk tools do not perform equitably for minorities. To date, little is known about the racial fairness of these algorithms as they are used in the field. This Article offers an original empirical study of a popular risk assessment tool to evaluate its race-based performance. The case study is novel in employing a two-sample design with large datasets from diverse jurisdictions, one with a supermajority white population and the other a supermajority Black population.Statistical analyses examine whether, in these jurisdictions, the algorithmic risk tool results in disparate impact, exhibits test bias, or displays differential validity in terms of unequal performance metrics for white versus Black defendants. Implications of the study results are informative to the broader knowledge base about risk assessment practices in the field. Results contribute to the debate about the topic of algorithmic fairness in an important setting where one’s liberty interests may be infringed despite not being adjudicated guilty of any crime.
摘要:风险评估算法是解决大规模监禁问题的刑事司法改革的核心。风险工具的最新应用集中在审前阶段,作为减少对基于财富的保释制度的依赖和审前拘留率的一种手段。然而,如果风险工具不能公平地为少数群体服务,那么实现改革运动目标的风险评估能力将受到挑战。到目前为止,人们对这些算法在该领域使用时的种族公平性知之甚少。本文对一种流行的风险评估工具进行了原始的实证研究,以评估其基于种族的绩效。该案例研究的新颖之处在于采用了来自不同司法管辖区的大型数据集的双样本设计,其中一个是白人人口占绝对多数,另一个是黑人人口占绝对多数。统计分析检查了在这些司法管辖区,算法风险工具是否会导致不同的影响,表现出测试偏差,或者在白人与黑人被告的不平等绩效指标方面显示出不同的有效性。研究结果的含义是信息的更广泛的知识库的风险评估实践在该领域。在一个重要的环境中,尽管没有被判犯有任何罪行,但一个人的自由利益可能会受到侵犯,结果引发了关于算法公平主题的辩论。
{"title":"Investigating Algorithmic Risk and Race","authors":"Melissa Hamilton","doi":"10.5070/cj85154807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5070/cj85154807","url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Hamilton, Melissa | Abstract: Risk assessment algorithms lie at the heart of criminal justice reform to tackle mass incarceration. The newest application of risk tools centers on the pretrial stage as a means to reduce both reliance upon wealth-based bail systems and rates of pretrial detention. Yet the ability of risk assessment to achieve the reform movement’s goals will be challengedif the risk tools do not perform equitably for minorities. To date, little is known about the racial fairness of these algorithms as they are used in the field. This Article offers an original empirical study of a popular risk assessment tool to evaluate its race-based performance. The case study is novel in employing a two-sample design with large datasets from diverse jurisdictions, one with a supermajority white population and the other a supermajority Black population.Statistical analyses examine whether, in these jurisdictions, the algorithmic risk tool results in disparate impact, exhibits test bias, or displays differential validity in terms of unequal performance metrics for white versus Black defendants. Implications of the study results are informative to the broader knowledge base about risk assessment practices in the field. Results contribute to the debate about the topic of algorithmic fairness in an important setting where one’s liberty interests may be infringed despite not being adjudicated guilty of any crime.","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43260632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mandatory Arbitration and Prison Services Contracts: How Private Companies Exploit the Incarcerated and Consumers to Reject Meaningful Accountability 强制性仲裁和监狱服务合同:私营公司如何利用被监禁者和消费者拒绝有意义的责任
Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.5070/cj85154812
Grace Bennett
Author(s): Bennett, Grace | Abstract: This Comment considers a previously unexamined, and particularly vile, consequence of the movement towards consumer arbitration clauses: their impact on incarcerated people and their families. Incarceration is physically, emotionally, and financially ruinous for both the incarcerated and for families who are routinely forced to subsidize their loved one’s incarceration through paying for things like phone calls and basic needs that prisons fail to meet. The burden on families has only increased as governments have contracted various aspects of correctional systems out to private companies that charge exorbitant prices for basic services, knowing full well that consumers have no choice but to comply if they want to provide for and stay connected to incarcerated loved ones. This system would be inhumane enough without the added element of forced arbitration. This Comment hopes to shine a light on how mandatory arbitration clauses make an already exploitative situation all the worse. Not only are families of the incarcerated charged outrageous and illegal prices to communicate with and protect their loved ones, but mandatory arbitration ensures that they have no real ability to hold responsible companies accountable.
摘要:本文考虑了消费者仲裁条款运动的一个先前未被研究的、特别恶劣的后果:它们对被监禁的人及其家人的影响。监禁在身体上、情感上和经济上对被监禁者和家庭都是毁灭性的,他们经常被迫通过支付电话费和监狱无法满足的基本需求来补贴他们所爱的人的监禁。由于政府将惩教系统的各个方面承包给私人公司,这些公司对基本服务收取过高的价格,因此家庭的负担只会增加,因为政府完全知道,如果消费者想要为被监禁的亲人提供服务并与他们保持联系,他们别无选择,只能遵守。如果没有强制仲裁这一附加因素,这一制度就已经足够不人道了。本评论希望阐明强制性仲裁条款如何使本已被剥削的情况变得更糟。不仅被监禁者的家属被收取离谱和非法的价格来与他们的亲人沟通和保护他们,而且强制性仲裁确保他们没有真正的能力追究负责任的公司的责任。
{"title":"Mandatory Arbitration and Prison Services Contracts: How Private Companies Exploit the Incarcerated and Consumers to Reject Meaningful Accountability","authors":"Grace Bennett","doi":"10.5070/cj85154812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5070/cj85154812","url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Bennett, Grace | Abstract: This Comment considers a previously unexamined, and particularly vile, consequence of the movement towards consumer arbitration clauses: their impact on incarcerated people and their families. Incarceration is physically, emotionally, and financially ruinous for both the incarcerated and for families who are routinely forced to subsidize their loved one’s incarceration through paying for things like phone calls and basic needs that prisons fail to meet. The burden on families has only increased as governments have contracted various aspects of correctional systems out to private companies that charge exorbitant prices for basic services, knowing full well that consumers have no choice but to comply if they want to provide for and stay connected to incarcerated loved ones. This system would be inhumane enough without the added element of forced arbitration. This Comment hopes to shine a light on how mandatory arbitration clauses make an already exploitative situation all the worse. Not only are families of the incarcerated charged outrageous and illegal prices to communicate with and protect their loved ones, but mandatory arbitration ensures that they have no real ability to hold responsible companies accountable.","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41293917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Some Modest Proposals for a Progressive Prosecutor 对进步检察官的几点建议
Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.5070/cj85154805
Steven Zeidman
The progressive prosecutor movement has spawned a number of races for District Attorney where candidates fight to claim the mantle of most progressive potential prosecutor. However, the promises made by self-described forward thinking, if not exactly radical, prosecutor candidates, as well as those made by newly elected District Attorneys, are at best the kind of reformist reforms criticized by many as having little impact on entrenched systems of oppression and as ultimately expanding their reach. It is incumbent on those looking for fundamental change in prosecutorial practices to try and assess whether any candidates are willing to take bolder steps than simply promising to prosecute more fairly and compassionately. Instead, the inquiry must be whether the candidate is willing to give up any aspects of the awesome power and the vast resources bestowed upon the office, particularly when it comes to the trial process. This essay provides a list of proposals that a prosecutor truly bent on far-reaching change should adopt. Taken together, the proposals pave the way for abolition of the role of the prosecutor.
进步检察官运动催生了一系列地区检察官竞选,候选人为争夺最进步的潜在检察官的衣钵而斗争。然而,自称具有前瞻性思维(如果不是完全激进的话)的检察官候选人以及新当选的地区检察官所做的承诺,充其量只是一种改革主义改革,被许多人批评为对根深蒂固的压迫制度影响不大,并最终扩大了其影响范围。那些希望从根本上改变检察做法的人有责任尝试和评估是否有候选人愿意采取比简单地承诺更公平、更富有同情心的起诉更大胆的措施。相反,调查必须是候选人是否愿意放弃赋予办公室的巨大权力和巨大资源的任何方面,尤其是在审判过程中。这篇文章提供了一份建议清单,一个真正致力于深远变革的检察官应该采纳这些建议。总之,这些建议为废除检察官的作用铺平了道路。
{"title":"Some Modest Proposals for a Progressive Prosecutor","authors":"Steven Zeidman","doi":"10.5070/cj85154805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5070/cj85154805","url":null,"abstract":"The progressive prosecutor movement has spawned a number of races for District Attorney where candidates fight to claim the mantle of most progressive potential prosecutor. However, the promises made by self-described forward thinking, if not exactly radical, prosecutor candidates, as well as those made by newly elected District Attorneys, are at best the kind of reformist reforms criticized by many as having little impact on entrenched systems of oppression and as ultimately expanding their reach. \u0000 \u0000It is incumbent on those looking for fundamental change in prosecutorial practices to try and assess whether any candidates are willing to take bolder steps than simply promising to prosecute more fairly and compassionately. Instead, the inquiry must be whether the candidate is willing to give up any aspects of the awesome power and the vast resources bestowed upon the office, particularly when it comes to the trial process. \u0000 \u0000This essay provides a list of proposals that a prosecutor truly bent on far-reaching change should adopt. Taken together, the proposals pave the way for abolition of the role of the prosecutor.","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49394882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CARCERAL IMMOBILITY AND FINANCIAL CAPTURE: A Framework for the Consequences of Racial Capitalism Penology and Monetary Sanctions. 种族资本主义的刑罚和货币制裁的后果框架。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Brittany Friedman
{"title":"CARCERAL IMMOBILITY AND FINANCIAL CAPTURE: A Framework for the Consequences of Racial Capitalism Penology and Monetary Sanctions.","authors":"Brittany Friedman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"4 1","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059700/pdf/nihms-1686133.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38834427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FISCAL PRESSURES, THE GREAT RECESSION, AND MONETARY SANCTIONS IN WASHINGTON COURTS OF LIMITED JURISDICTION. 财政压力,大衰退,以及华盛顿法院有限管辖权下的货币制裁。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Frank Edwards

Many municipal governments have come to depend heavily on fines and fees generated by the criminal justice system. This essay uses data from all courts of limited jurisdiction (municipal and district courts) in Washington State between 2000 and 2014 to evaluate the relationships between local government finances, the Great Recession, and the imposition of debt through the criminal justice system. I find that municipalities issued more criminal justice debt during and after the recession across Washington, but that government finances as measured by tax receipts and expenditures per capita were weakly related to sentencing practices. These findings suggest that macroeconomic fiscal pressures may be drivers of enforcement and prosecutorial practices through increasing case volumes, but that macroeconomic pressures and local fiscal pressures did not appear to shift court sentencing practices in Washington during the Great Recession.

许多市政府严重依赖刑事司法系统产生的罚款和费用。本文使用2000年至2014年间华盛顿州所有有限管辖权法院(市和区法院)的数据来评估地方政府财政、大衰退和通过刑事司法系统征收债务之间的关系。我发现,在整个华盛顿的经济衰退期间和之后,市政当局发行了更多的刑事司法债务,但以人均税收收入和支出衡量的政府财政与量刑实践的关系很弱。这些发现表明,宏观经济财政压力可能会通过增加案件数量来推动执法和起诉行为,但宏观经济压力和地方财政压力似乎并没有改变大衰退期间华盛顿法院的量刑做法。
{"title":"FISCAL PRESSURES, THE GREAT RECESSION, AND MONETARY SANCTIONS IN WASHINGTON COURTS OF LIMITED JURISDICTION.","authors":"Frank Edwards","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many municipal governments have come to depend heavily on fines and fees generated by the criminal justice system. This essay uses data from all courts of limited jurisdiction (municipal and district courts) in Washington State between 2000 and 2014 to evaluate the relationships between local government finances, the Great Recession, and the imposition of debt through the criminal justice system. I find that municipalities issued more criminal justice debt during and after the recession across Washington, but that government finances as measured by tax receipts and expenditures per capita were weakly related to sentencing practices. These findings suggest that macroeconomic fiscal pressures may be drivers of enforcement and prosecutorial practices through increasing case volumes, but that macroeconomic pressures and local fiscal pressures did not appear to shift court sentencing practices in Washington during the Great Recession.</p>","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"4 1","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121266/pdf/nihms-1685112.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38990429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PAY UNTO CAESAR:Breaches of Justice in the Monetary Sanctions Regime. PAY UNTO CAESAR:Breaches of Justice in the Monetary Sanctions Regime.
Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Mary Pattillo, Gabriela Kirk

Monetary sanctions include fines, fees, restitution, surcharges, interest, and other costs imposed on people who are convicted of crimes ranging from traffic violations to violent felonies. We analyze how people in the court system theorize about monetary sanctions with regards to four kinds of justice: constitutional, retributive, procedural, and distributive justice. Drawing on qualitative interviews with sixty-eight people sentenced to pay monetary sanctions in Illinois, we identify five themes that illuminate how respondents think about these forms of justice: monetary sanctions are: (1) justifiable punishment, (2) impossible to pay due to poverty, (3) double punishment, (4) extortion, and (5) collected by an opaque and greedy state. We find that for defendants in the criminal justice system, monetary sanctions serve some retributive aims, but do not align with the other three domains of justice. We discuss the policy implications of these findings.

金钱制裁包括对被判犯有从交通违规到暴力重罪等各种罪行的人征收的罚款、费用、归还、附加费、利息和其他费用。我们分析了法院系统中的人们是如何从宪法正义、报应正义、程序正义和分配正义这四种正义的角度对金钱制裁进行理论分析的。通过对伊利诺伊州 68 名被判支付金钱制裁的人进行定性访谈,我们确定了五个主题,这些主题阐明了受访者是如何看待这些司法形式的:金钱制裁是:(1)合理的惩罚;(2)因贫穷而无法支付;(3)双重惩罚;(4)敲诈勒索;(5)由不透明且贪婪的国家收取。我们发现,对于刑事司法系统中的被告而言,金钱制裁可以达到某些惩罚目的,但与其他三个司法领域并不一致。我们将讨论这些发现对政策的影响。
{"title":"PAY UNTO CAESAR:Breaches of Justice in the Monetary Sanctions Regime.","authors":"Mary Pattillo, Gabriela Kirk","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monetary sanctions include fines, fees, restitution, surcharges, interest, and other costs imposed on people who are convicted of crimes ranging from traffic violations to violent felonies. We analyze how people in the court system theorize about monetary sanctions with regards to four kinds of justice: constitutional, retributive, procedural, and distributive justice. Drawing on qualitative interviews with sixty-eight people sentenced to pay monetary sanctions in Illinois, we identify five themes that illuminate how respondents think about these forms of justice: monetary sanctions are: (1) justifiable punishment, (2) impossible to pay due to poverty, (3) double punishment, (4) extortion, and (5) collected by an opaque and greedy state. We find that for defendants in the criminal justice system, monetary sanctions serve some retributive aims, but do not align with the other three domains of justice. We discuss the policy implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"4 1","pages":"49-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8232883/pdf/nihms-1706884.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39134756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FRAMING THE SYSTEM OF MONETARY SANCTIONS AS PREDATORY: Policies, Practices, and Motivations. 将货币制裁体系框定为掠夺性的:政策、实践和动机。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Alexes Harris
{"title":"FRAMING THE SYSTEM OF MONETARY SANCTIONS AS PREDATORY: Policies, Practices, and Motivations.","authors":"Alexes Harris","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555390/pdf/nihms-1686151.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33511729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
UCLA criminal justice law review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1