This editorial provides an overview of how language use has been measured in second language acquisition (SLA) research and how it can be implemented in studies on pronunciation. The use of surveys and questionnaires, self-reports, and other methods is discussed along with the limitations of these current methods and recommendations. Measuring language use reliably can be challenging, but implementing and adapting current methods can help make it easier.
{"title":"Measuring language use for pronunciation research","authors":"Zoe Zawadzki, John M. Levis","doi":"10.1075/jslp.24016.zaw","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.24016.zaw","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This editorial provides an overview of how language use has been measured in second language acquisition (SLA)\u0000 research and how it can be implemented in studies on pronunciation. The use of surveys and questionnaires, self-reports, and other\u0000 methods is discussed along with the limitations of these current methods and recommendations. Measuring language use reliably can\u0000 be challenging, but implementing and adapting current methods can help make it easier.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141380820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Review of Walker & Archer (2024): Teaching English Pronunciation for a Global World","authors":"Donna M. Brinton","doi":"10.1075/jslp.24021.bri","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.24021.bri","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141380713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carol Johnson, Walcir Cardoso, Beau Zuercher, Kathleen Brannen, Suzanne Springer
Language institutions need efficient and reliable placement tests to ensure students are placed in appropriate classes. This can be achieved by automating the scoring of pronunciation tests via the use of speech recognition, as its reliability has been shown to be comparable to that of human raters. However, this technology can be costly as it requires development and maintenance, placing it beyond the means of many institutions. This study investigates the feasibility of assessing English second language pronunciation in placement tests through the use of a free automatic speech recognition tool, Google Voice Typing (GVT). We compared human-rated and GVT-rated scores of 56 pronunciation placement tests. Our results indicate a strong correlation between scores for the final rating and for each criterion on the rubric used by human raters. We conclude that leveraging this free speech technology could increase the test usefulness of language placement tests.
{"title":"Assessing pronunciation using dictation tools","authors":"Carol Johnson, Walcir Cardoso, Beau Zuercher, Kathleen Brannen, Suzanne Springer","doi":"10.1075/jslp.23033.joh","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23033.joh","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Language institutions need efficient and reliable placement tests to ensure students are placed in appropriate classes.\u0000 This can be achieved by automating the scoring of pronunciation tests via the use of speech recognition, as its reliability has been shown\u0000 to be comparable to that of human raters. However, this technology can be costly as it requires development and maintenance, placing it\u0000 beyond the means of many institutions. This study investigates the feasibility of assessing English second language pronunciation in\u0000 placement tests through the use of a free automatic speech recognition tool, Google Voice Typing (GVT). We compared human-rated and\u0000 GVT-rated scores of 56 pronunciation placement tests. Our results indicate a strong correlation between scores for the final rating and for\u0000 each criterion on the rubric used by human raters. We conclude that leveraging this free speech technology could increase the test\u0000 usefulness of language placement tests.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141380645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study investigated the impact of listeners’ dialectal variations within the same L1 on perceptions of L2 speech comprehensibility and accentedness. Thirty untrained British and American English-L1 raters assessed recorded L2 speech samples from 29 Finnish learners of English and provided scalar judgments for their comprehensibility and accentedness. Four linguistically trained graduate students evaluated the samples for segmental accuracy, speech rate, word stress and intonation. Results of linear mixed models indicated no significant effect of raters’ L1 variety on global comprehensibility and accentedness ratings. While American and British raters relied on same pronunciation features in their comprehensibility judgments, they placed different levels of importance on pronunciation features when making accentedness judgments. Particularly, both groups primarily exhibited sensitivity towards segmental errors in their assessments of accentedness, whereas American raters demonstrated an additional sensitivity to intonation. The findings underscore the complexity of accent perception based on the L1 variety of listeners.
{"title":"Effects of listeners’ dialectal variation on comprehensibility and accentedness judgements of second language\u0000 speech","authors":"Payam Ghaffarvand-Mokari","doi":"10.1075/jslp.23018.gha","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23018.gha","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study investigated the impact of listeners’ dialectal variations within the same L1 on perceptions of L2\u0000 speech comprehensibility and accentedness. Thirty untrained British and American English-L1 raters assessed recorded L2 speech\u0000 samples from 29 Finnish learners of English and provided scalar judgments for their comprehensibility and accentedness. Four\u0000 linguistically trained graduate students evaluated the samples for segmental accuracy, speech rate, word stress and intonation.\u0000 Results of linear mixed models indicated no significant effect of raters’ L1 variety on global comprehensibility and accentedness\u0000 ratings. While American and British raters relied on same pronunciation features in their comprehensibility judgments, they placed\u0000 different levels of importance on pronunciation features when making accentedness judgments. Particularly, both groups primarily\u0000 exhibited sensitivity towards segmental errors in their assessments of accentedness, whereas American raters demonstrated an\u0000 additional sensitivity to intonation. The findings underscore the complexity of accent perception based on the L1 variety of\u0000 listeners.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141104290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}