Blood advances最新文献

Abstract: The Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network conducted a phase 3 randomized trial comparing gilteritinib with placebo after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS); however, patients with FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) peri-HCT had significantly longer RFS with gilteritinib. This analysis investigates the effect of post-HCT gilteritinib vs placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at post-HCT randomization; day 29; months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24; and/or end of therapy. HRQOL and clinically meaningful differences were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed model repeated measures to evaluate longitudinal change from baseline and stratified Cox model to evaluate time to improvement. HRQOL completion rate was acceptable (>70%) across all time points and measures. There were no differences in HRQOL scores at any time point between cohorts. Clinically meaningful and time to improvement in HRQOL were similar in both arms. Despite higher treatment-emergent adverse effects with gilteritinib, response to the question of being "bothered by side effects of treatment" did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of MRD-positive and negative patients demonstrated no differences in HRQOL between arms. For patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML undergoing HCT, gilteritinib maintenance was not associated with any difference in HRQOL or patient-reported impact of side effects. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02997202.

Abstract: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement remains a clinical hurdle in treating childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). The disease mechanisms of CNS leukemia are primarily investigated using 2-dimensional cell culture and mouse models. Given the variations in cellular identity and architecture between the human and murine CNS, it becomes imperative to seek complementary models to study CNS leukemia. Here, we present a first-of-its-kind 3-dimensional coculture model combining human brain organoids and BCP-ALL cells. We noticed significantly higher engraftment of BCP-ALL cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells in cerebral organoids than non-ALL cells. To validate translatability between organoid coculture and in vivo murine models, we confirmed that targeting CNS leukemia-relevant pathways such as CD79a/Igα or C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-stromal cell-derived factor 1 reduced the invasion of BCP-ALL cells into organoids. RNA sequencing and functional validations of organoid-invading leukemia cells compared with the noninvaded fraction revealed significant upregulation of activator protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor-complex members in organoid-invading cells. Moreover, we detected a significant enrichment of AP-1 pathway genes in PDX ALL cells recovered from the CNS compared with spleen blasts of mice that had received transplantation with TCF3::PBX1+ PDX cells, substantiating the role of AP-1 signaling in CNS disease. Accordingly, we found significantly higher levels of the AP-1 gene, jun proto-oncogene, in patients initially diagnosed as CNS-positive BCP-ALL compared with CNS-negative cases as well as CNS-relapse vs non-CNS-relapse cases in a cohort of 100 patients with BCP-ALL. Our results suggest CNS organoids as a novel model to investigate CNS involvement and identify the AP-1 pathway as a critical driver of CNS disease in BCP-ALL.

Abstract: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative or qualitative defects in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein. Type 3 VWD has a severe bleeding phenotype caused by the absence of VWF, in which treatment usually involves replacement therapy with VWF-containing products. The immune system can react to the VWF product and form anti-VWF antibodies to neutralize or clear the VWF, which can compromise efficacy of treatment or lead to anaphylaxis. Current diagnostic testing is limited to the detection of anti-VWF antibodies that neutralize VWF binding to platelets by using a ristocetin cofactor assay. We set out to develop assays to identify both neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies to screen, quantify, and characterize anti-VWF antibodies in samples from the Zimmerman Program, a large multicenter study of patients with VWD. We detected anti-VWF immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgM antibodies in 18% of 49 unrelated individuals with type 3 VWD. The antibodies ranged in concentration and consisted of 33% nonneutralizing and 67% neutralizing to factor VIII, collagen III, platelet glycoprotein Ib alpha (GPIbα), and/or collagen IV binding. Of the positive type 3 VWD samples, 8 of 9 were IgG, which were further subclassified into mostly IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. Through a series of testing methods, we identified VWF-specific antibodies in 9 unrelated individuals with type 3 VWD with varying demographics, bleeding phenotypes, and genetic variants. This anti-VWF antibody testing strategy provides a useful tool to assess risk and better navigate treatment options for patients with type 3 VWD.

Concept Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors treats hemophilia A or B by delivering a functional F8 or F9 gene to hepatocytes. This single infusion enables endogenous production of FVIII or FIX protein, reducing bleeding in patients. Evolution Long-term clinical studies have provided insight into the efficacy, safety, and durability of AAV-mediated gene therapies for hemophilia A and B. Gene therapies have now been approved for hemophilia A (valoctocogene roxaparvovec) and hemophilia B (etranacogene dezaparvovec; fidanacogene elaparvovec) in select regions. Application The approved gene therapies are associated with a strong reduction in bleeding tendency and increased FVIII or FIX activity levels, without the need for additional FVIII or FIX replacement therapies, in the vast majority of patients. Future Steps Improvements in AAV technology, protein expression, and immunogenicity may render AAV-mediated gene therapies more efficient, longer lasting and safer for people with hemophilia A or B.

Abstract: Financial hardship is a common experience for patients and their families after the diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy and is associated with worse outcomes. Health care costs, increased costs of living, income poverty, and inadequate wealth contribute to financial hardship after the diagnosis and treatment of a hematologic malignancy and/or hematopoietic cell transplant. Given the multidimensional nature of financial hardship, a multidisciplinary team-based approach is needed to address this public health hazard. Hematologists and oncologists may mitigate the impact of financial hardship by matching treatment options with patient goals of care and reducing symptom burden disruptive to employment. Social workers and financial navigators can assist with screening and resource deployment. Policymakers and researchers can identify structural and policy changes to prevent financial hardship. By alleviating this major health care burden from patients, care teams may improve survival and quality of life for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Abstract: Exposure to cancer therapies is associated with an increased risk of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). The objective of our study was to investigate the genesis and evolution of CH after cancer therapy. In this prospective study, we undertook error-corrected duplex DNA sequencing in blood samples collected before and at 2 time points after chemoradiation in patients with esophageal or lung cancer recruited from 2013 to 2018. We applied a customized workflow to identify the earliest changes in CH mutation count and clone size and determine their association with clinical outcomes. Our study included 29 patients (87 samples). Their median age was 67 years, and 76% (n = 22) were male; the median follow-up period was 3.9 years. The most mutated genes were DNMT3A, TET2, TP53, and ASXL1. We observed a twofold increase in the number of mutations from before to after treatment in TP53, which differed from all other genes examined (P < .001). Among mutations detected before and after treatment, we observed an increased clone size in 38% and a decreased clone size in 5% of TP53 mutations (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-7.84; P < .001). Changes in mutation count and clone size were not observed in other genes. Individuals with an increase in the number of TP53 mutations after chemoradiation experienced shorter overall survival (hazard ratio, 7.07; 95% CI, 1.50-33.46; P = .014). In summary, we found an increase in the number and size of TP53 CH clones after chemoradiation that were associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Abstract: Gene therapy for severe hemophilia A uses an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector and liver-specific promoters that depend on healthy hepatocyte function to achieve safe and long-lasting increases in factor VIII (FVIII) activity. Thus, hepatocyte health is an essential aspect of safe and successful gene therapy. Many people living with hemophilia A have current or past chronic hepatitis C virus infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis or steatohepatitis, or other conditions that may compromise the efficacy and safety of AAV-mediated gene therapy. In addition, gene therapy may induce an immune response to transduced hepatocytes, leading to liver inflammation and reduced FVIII activity. The immune response can be treated with immunosuppression, but close monitoring of liver function tests and factor levels is necessary. The long-term risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with gene therapy is unknown. Routine screening by imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma, preferable every 6 months, is essential in patients at high risk and recommended in all recipients of hemophilia A gene therapy. This paper describes our current understanding of the biologic underpinnings of how liver health affects hemophilia A gene therapy, and provides practical clinical guidance for assessing, monitoring, and managing liver health both before and after gene therapy.