Natella Rakhmanina, Justin Unternaher, Tierra Williams, Kevin J Ryan, Kedria Walker, Edward P Acosta, John Van Den Anker, Rachel K Scott
We report individualized off-label monthly use of a high dose of long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV = 600 mg/900 mg) co-administered preconceptionally and throughout pregnancy with subcutaneous lenacapavir to a young woman with perinatally acquired HIV, multiple comorbidities, and class III obesity. Therapeutic drug monitoring for CAB and RPV was performed throughout the pregnancy and postpartum. At 7 weeks gestation, the plasma CAB and RPV Ctroughs were 16 (2.58 mg/L) and 9 (0.11 mg/L) times above the respective protein adjusted (PA)-IC90. From 7 to 32 weeks of gestation, plasma CAB and RPV Ctroughs decreased to 1.28 and to 0.08 mg/L, respectively, but remained above PA-IC90 for both drugs. After receiving one monthly high-dose CAB/RPV injection after delivery at 7 weeks postpartum, the plasma CAB and RPV Ctroughs were 4.02 and 0.19 mg/L, 56% and 73% higher than at 7 weeks of gestation. Despite a decrease in cabotegravir (50%) and rilpivirine (27%) concentrations between first and third trimesters, plasma exposures remained above therapeutic thresholds and viral load <20 copies/mL was maintained throughout pregnancy. Higher CAB and RPV exposures did not result in adverse maternal, pregnancy or infant safety outcomes. At 7 weeks postpartum, CAB/RPV was switched to standard bimonthly dosing. At 33 weeks postpartum, the patient remained undetectable on standard CAB/RPV bimonthly dose, although subsequent pregnancies might require long-acting CAB/RPV dosing adjustments. Our case of empiric use of high-dose CAB/RPV with monthly injections and therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy in a complex patient with class III obesity provides novel insights into pharmacokinetics of long-acting CAB/RPV.
{"title":"Off-label dosing of long-acting injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine during pregnancy: A case study with therapeutic drug monitoring.","authors":"Natella Rakhmanina, Justin Unternaher, Tierra Williams, Kevin J Ryan, Kedria Walker, Edward P Acosta, John Van Den Anker, Rachel K Scott","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report individualized off-label monthly use of a high dose of long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV = 600 mg/900 mg) co-administered preconceptionally and throughout pregnancy with subcutaneous lenacapavir to a young woman with perinatally acquired HIV, multiple comorbidities, and class III obesity. Therapeutic drug monitoring for CAB and RPV was performed throughout the pregnancy and postpartum. At 7 weeks gestation, the plasma CAB and RPV C<sub>troughs</sub> were 16 (2.58 mg/L) and 9 (0.11 mg/L) times above the respective protein adjusted (PA)-IC<sub>90</sub>. From 7 to 32 weeks of gestation, plasma CAB and RPV C<sub>troughs</sub> decreased to 1.28 and to 0.08 mg/L, respectively, but remained above PA-IC<sub>90</sub> for both drugs. After receiving one monthly high-dose CAB/RPV injection after delivery at 7 weeks postpartum, the plasma CAB and RPV C<sub>troughs</sub> were 4.02 and 0.19 mg/L, 56% and 73% higher than at 7 weeks of gestation. Despite a decrease in cabotegravir (50%) and rilpivirine (27%) concentrations between first and third trimesters, plasma exposures remained above therapeutic thresholds and viral load <20 copies/mL was maintained throughout pregnancy. Higher CAB and RPV exposures did not result in adverse maternal, pregnancy or infant safety outcomes. At 7 weeks postpartum, CAB/RPV was switched to standard bimonthly dosing. At 33 weeks postpartum, the patient remained undetectable on standard CAB/RPV bimonthly dose, although subsequent pregnancies might require long-acting CAB/RPV dosing adjustments. Our case of empiric use of high-dose CAB/RPV with monthly injections and therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy in a complex patient with class III obesity provides novel insights into pharmacokinetics of long-acting CAB/RPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145766949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eman Mshari, Fannie LaJeunesse-Trempe, Stephen Morley, Caroline Copeland
Bariatric surgery alters gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology, which likely impacts upon oral medication absorption. Drug- and alcohol-related deaths in this population are being increasingly reported; however, toxicological detail is lacking. Using data reported to the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality, we identified 18 deaths in people who had previously undergone bariatric surgery. Opioids were detected in almost all cases and were frequently implicated in causing death. Multiple medications were detected at post-mortem in every case and often included medications that the deceased was not actively prescribed. Mental health conditions and chronic pain were commonly listed comorbidities and one-third of deaths were deemed suicide. Illicit drug and alcohol use was rare, highlighting a distinct vulnerability to prescription medication harms. Our findings emphasize a need to understand how bariatric surgery alters pharmacokinetics and for integrated, multidisciplinary aftercare, therapeutic drug monitoring and tailored education of safe medication use in bariatric surgery patients.
{"title":"Drug poisonings following bariatric surgery: Case series report.","authors":"Eman Mshari, Fannie LaJeunesse-Trempe, Stephen Morley, Caroline Copeland","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bariatric surgery alters gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology, which likely impacts upon oral medication absorption. Drug- and alcohol-related deaths in this population are being increasingly reported; however, toxicological detail is lacking. Using data reported to the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality, we identified 18 deaths in people who had previously undergone bariatric surgery. Opioids were detected in almost all cases and were frequently implicated in causing death. Multiple medications were detected at post-mortem in every case and often included medications that the deceased was not actively prescribed. Mental health conditions and chronic pain were commonly listed comorbidities and one-third of deaths were deemed suicide. Illicit drug and alcohol use was rare, highlighting a distinct vulnerability to prescription medication harms. Our findings emphasize a need to understand how bariatric surgery alters pharmacokinetics and for integrated, multidisciplinary aftercare, therapeutic drug monitoring and tailored education of safe medication use in bariatric surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Domenico Nocera, Giusi Forastiero, Andrea Logreco, Alessia Proietti, Antonio Galluccio, Carlotta Lunghi, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Fabrizio De Ponti
{"title":"Toward the harmonization of bioequivalence guidelines in Europe: Commentary on the state of the art and future priorities under ICH M13A for immediate-release oral forms.","authors":"Domenico Nocera, Giusi Forastiero, Andrea Logreco, Alessia Proietti, Antonio Galluccio, Carlotta Lunghi, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Fabrizio De Ponti","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70429","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bcp.70429","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andriy A Gorbenko, Titiaan E Post, Pamela K Strugala, Erica S Klaassen, Linda E Klumpers, Saco J de Visser, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Jules A A C Heuberger, Geert J Groeneveld
Aims: Cannabidiol (CBD), the main non-intoxicating compound from the cannabis plant, is regularly used by patients with chronic pain who also take analgesics. CBD has previously been shown to inhibit CYP-mediated drug metabolism. This study aimed to characterize the potential pharmacokinetic interaction of CBD with amitriptyline and tramadol, two commonly used analgesics.
Methods: This was an open-label, fixed-sequence, 2-way crossover study in 13 healthy participants. On Day 1, 25 mg amitriptyline and 50 mg tramadol were co-administered orally in a fasted condition, followed by a 7-day washout period. On Day 8, 30 mg CBD was administered orally 1 h prior to amitriptyline and tramadol. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for CBD, amitriptyline, tramadol and their respective active metabolites nortriptyline and O-desmethyltramadol for up to 24 h post-dose. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared between visits using a mixed effects model.
Results: Twelve participants (4M/8F) completed the study; one participant (M) dropped out for personal reasons. CBD significantly increased the AUC0-24h (least square means [LSM] ratio 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.26, p = 0.033) and the Cmax (LSM ratio 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36, p = 0.041) of amitriptyline. CBD did not significantly change the AUC0-24h and Cmax of nortriptyline and tramadol, and the Cmax of O-desmethyltramadol.
Conclusions: A single dose of 30 mg CBD significantly influenced the metabolism of amitriptyline in healthy volunteers. In patients, CBD-induced drug interactions may be more pronounced in chronic dosing and dependent upon prandial status.
{"title":"Low-dose cannabidiol increases plasma concentrations of amitriptyline: A clinical drug-drug interaction study.","authors":"Andriy A Gorbenko, Titiaan E Post, Pamela K Strugala, Erica S Klaassen, Linda E Klumpers, Saco J de Visser, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Jules A A C Heuberger, Geert J Groeneveld","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD), the main non-intoxicating compound from the cannabis plant, is regularly used by patients with chronic pain who also take analgesics. CBD has previously been shown to inhibit CYP-mediated drug metabolism. This study aimed to characterize the potential pharmacokinetic interaction of CBD with amitriptyline and tramadol, two commonly used analgesics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label, fixed-sequence, 2-way crossover study in 13 healthy participants. On Day 1, 25 mg amitriptyline and 50 mg tramadol were co-administered orally in a fasted condition, followed by a 7-day washout period. On Day 8, 30 mg CBD was administered orally 1 h prior to amitriptyline and tramadol. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for CBD, amitriptyline, tramadol and their respective active metabolites nortriptyline and O-desmethyltramadol for up to 24 h post-dose. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared between visits using a mixed effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve participants (4M/8F) completed the study; one participant (M) dropped out for personal reasons. CBD significantly increased the AUC<sub>0-24h</sub> (least square means [LSM] ratio 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.26, p = 0.033) and the C<sub>max</sub> (LSM ratio 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36, p = 0.041) of amitriptyline. CBD did not significantly change the AUC<sub>0-24h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of nortriptyline and tramadol, and the C<sub>max</sub> of O-desmethyltramadol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single dose of 30 mg CBD significantly influenced the metabolism of amitriptyline in healthy volunteers. In patients, CBD-induced drug interactions may be more pronounced in chronic dosing and dependent upon prandial status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrej Belančić, Ivana Stević, Elvira Meni Maria Gkrinia, Dinko Vitezić, Slobodan Janković
Introduction: In recent years, the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare disease, has significantly progressed, improving patients' survival and overall quality of life. However, current SMA treatments are expensive, and some (nusinersen) are very inconvenient for patients. There is reason to believe that there are economic benefits of switching patients from nusinersen to risdiplam, especially because real-world analysis has shown non-inferiority in clinical outcomes along with a favourable safety profile of switching.
Aim: To conduct the cost-utility analysis of switching from nusinersen to risdiplam.
Methods: A discrete event simulation model was created for three different groups of patients with SMA (types 1-3), comparing the cost-utility of nusinersen to the risdiplam switch and continuing nusinersen therapy. Analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Croatian Health Insurance Fund for the time horizon of 80 years. A deterministic, one-way, one-factor sensitivity analysis was carried out using the Monte Carlo simulation.
Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of nusinersen to risdiplam switch versus staying on nusinersen was EUR-136930 ± 82 336 for type 1 SMA (i.e. the switch dominated), for type 2 SMA it was EUR 2681860 ± 321 859, and for type 3 SMA it was EUR 2576667 ± 676 078. For all three types of SMA, switching to risdiplam showed positive net monetary benefit (type 1: EUR 35449 ± 17 113; type 2: EUR 799264 ± 30 765; type 3: EUR 767498 ± 7283). Market forces may substantially impact pricing dynamics; therefore, these results should be interpreted with consideration of inherent uncertainties.
Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness of switching from nusinersen to risdiplam is evident across all SMA types. Further research on the long-term impact of switching treatments in SMA is essential to address uncertainties and optimize cost-effective therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"Cost-utility analysis of nusinersen-risdiplam switch in patients with spinal muscular atrophy in Croatia: A discrete event simulation model.","authors":"Andrej Belančić, Ivana Stević, Elvira Meni Maria Gkrinia, Dinko Vitezić, Slobodan Janković","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare disease, has significantly progressed, improving patients' survival and overall quality of life. However, current SMA treatments are expensive, and some (nusinersen) are very inconvenient for patients. There is reason to believe that there are economic benefits of switching patients from nusinersen to risdiplam, especially because real-world analysis has shown non-inferiority in clinical outcomes along with a favourable safety profile of switching.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct the cost-utility analysis of switching from nusinersen to risdiplam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete event simulation model was created for three different groups of patients with SMA (types 1-3), comparing the cost-utility of nusinersen to the risdiplam switch and continuing nusinersen therapy. Analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Croatian Health Insurance Fund for the time horizon of 80 years. A deterministic, one-way, one-factor sensitivity analysis was carried out using the Monte Carlo simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of nusinersen to risdiplam switch versus staying on nusinersen was EUR-136930 ± 82 336 for type 1 SMA (i.e. the switch dominated), for type 2 SMA it was EUR 2681860 ± 321 859, and for type 3 SMA it was EUR 2576667 ± 676 078. For all three types of SMA, switching to risdiplam showed positive net monetary benefit (type 1: EUR 35449 ± 17 113; type 2: EUR 799264 ± 30 765; type 3: EUR 767498 ± 7283). Market forces may substantially impact pricing dynamics; therefore, these results should be interpreted with consideration of inherent uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of switching from nusinersen to risdiplam is evident across all SMA types. Further research on the long-term impact of switching treatments in SMA is essential to address uncertainties and optimize cost-effective therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have well-documented cardiovascular benefits. However, the cardiovascular benefits of early SGLT2i use in diabetics experiencing acute myocardial infarction (MI) remain unclear.
Methods: To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of early initiation of SGLT2i in diabetics experiencing acute MI, this study emulated a target trial using data from Taiwan's Health Research Data Integration Service of the National Health Insurance Administration. This study analysed cardiovascular composite outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), MI re-hospitalization, ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and individual outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: Among 36,103 diabetic patients experiencing acute MI, SGLT2i administration within 14 days after acute MI (N = 2,149) reduced cardiovascular composite risks relative to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) (N = 10,802, HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p = 0.0017). Compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i significantly reduced HHF (HR = 0.86, 0.79-0.95), MI re-hospitalization (HR = 0.70, 0.62-0.80), and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.65, 0.54-0.79) risks, but not ischaemic stroke. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust therapeutic efficacy of SGLT2i, and Subgroup analyses suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of SGLT2i may be affected by chronic kidney disease, age, and percutaneous coronary intervention. The cardiovascular benefits were consistent across patients without heart failure and new SGLT2i users. Exploratory analyses revealed comparable results between SGLT2i and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
Conclusions: Early SGLT2i use in diabetics experiencing acute MI reduced cardiovascular risk, supporting its potential therapeutic use.
{"title":"Cardiovascular benefits of early sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use for diabetics with acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Sheng-Fan Wang, Tzu-Kuan Chan, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Yu-Shiuan Wang, Chian-Ying Chou, Yuh-Lih Chang, Hui-Ju Tsai, Hsin-Chen Lee, Gregory Y H Lip, Chern-En Chiang, Chen-Huan Chen, Hao-Min Cheng","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have well-documented cardiovascular benefits. However, the cardiovascular benefits of early SGLT2i use in diabetics experiencing acute myocardial infarction (MI) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of early initiation of SGLT2i in diabetics experiencing acute MI, this study emulated a target trial using data from Taiwan's Health Research Data Integration Service of the National Health Insurance Administration. This study analysed cardiovascular composite outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), MI re-hospitalization, ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and individual outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 36,103 diabetic patients experiencing acute MI, SGLT2i administration within 14 days after acute MI (N = 2,149) reduced cardiovascular composite risks relative to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) (N = 10,802, HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p = 0.0017). Compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i significantly reduced HHF (HR = 0.86, 0.79-0.95), MI re-hospitalization (HR = 0.70, 0.62-0.80), and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.65, 0.54-0.79) risks, but not ischaemic stroke. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust therapeutic efficacy of SGLT2i, and Subgroup analyses suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of SGLT2i may be affected by chronic kidney disease, age, and percutaneous coronary intervention. The cardiovascular benefits were consistent across patients without heart failure and new SGLT2i users. Exploratory analyses revealed comparable results between SGLT2i and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early SGLT2i use in diabetics experiencing acute MI reduced cardiovascular risk, supporting its potential therapeutic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ACEi/ARB) therapy is recommended to improve outcomes after acute kidney injury (AKI). However, data on their effects in very old adults after AKI remain limited.
Methods: This cohort study utilized data from TriNetX, including adults aged ≥85 years who underwent dialysis during hospitalization and discontinued dialysis upon discharge between 2012 and 2022. Patients initiating ACEi/ARB within 90 days post-discharge were identified and propensity score-matched (1:1) with controls. Outcomes, including mortality, major adverse kidney events (MAKE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models in an emulated target trial analysis.
Results: Among 88 024 patients, 3637 ACEi/ARB users were matched to 3637 controls, with a mean follow-up of 9.02 months. ACEi/ARB use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.64; p < 0.01) and MAKE (aHR = 0.63; p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in MACE between groups (aHR = 0.94; p = 0.49). The observed protective effect of ACEi/ARB on MAKE was more pronounced in patients with hypertension. ACEi/ARB use was associated with a higher risk of hypotension (aHR = 1.38; p < 0.01) and hyperkalaemia (aHR = 1.69; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Among very old adults after dialysis for AKI, the ACEi/ARB therapy was significantly associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and MAKE, but with a significantly increased risk of hypotension and hyperkalaemia. These findings support the cautious use of ACEi/ARB in this high-risk population.
{"title":"Clinical outcomes associated with ACE inhibitors and ARBs use in adults older than 85 years who recovered from dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury.","authors":"Jui-Yi Chen, Chung-Yi Li","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ACEi/ARB) therapy is recommended to improve outcomes after acute kidney injury (AKI). However, data on their effects in very old adults after AKI remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study utilized data from TriNetX, including adults aged ≥85 years who underwent dialysis during hospitalization and discontinued dialysis upon discharge between 2012 and 2022. Patients initiating ACEi/ARB within 90 days post-discharge were identified and propensity score-matched (1:1) with controls. Outcomes, including mortality, major adverse kidney events (MAKE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models in an emulated target trial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 88 024 patients, 3637 ACEi/ARB users were matched to 3637 controls, with a mean follow-up of 9.02 months. ACEi/ARB use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.64; p < 0.01) and MAKE (aHR = 0.63; p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in MACE between groups (aHR = 0.94; p = 0.49). The observed protective effect of ACEi/ARB on MAKE was more pronounced in patients with hypertension. ACEi/ARB use was associated with a higher risk of hypotension (aHR = 1.38; p < 0.01) and hyperkalaemia (aHR = 1.69; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among very old adults after dialysis for AKI, the ACEi/ARB therapy was significantly associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and MAKE, but with a significantly increased risk of hypotension and hyperkalaemia. These findings support the cautious use of ACEi/ARB in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><b>51</b></p><p><b>The good prescriber—Building a clinical decision support system</b></p><p><span>Steffen Skindbjerg Pedersen</span><sup>1</sup>, Tara Hoffmann Faaborg<sup>2</sup>, Signe Wegmann Düring<sup>3,4</sup>, Mikkel Bring Christensen<sup>3,5</sup> and Gesche Jürgens<sup>1,2,3</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Research Unit For Clinical Psychopharmacology, Mental Health Services West, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zealand University Hospital, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>3</sup><i>Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen;</i> <sup>4</sup><i>Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>5</sup><i>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region</i></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p>Psychiatric patients are often treated with multiple medications, increasing the risk of side effects, drug–drug interactions and suboptimal treatments. Regular medication reviews are essential for safe prescribing but are time-consuming and difficult to integrate into routine clinical practice.</p><p>To address this, we are developing a Clinical Decision Support System to assist doctors in reviewing and optimizing medications more efficiently. By integrating publicly available drug information with patient-specific data automatically extracted from electronic health records, the system aims to deliver timely, personalized alerts and guidance helping clinicians identify risks and optimize treatment.</p><p><b>Methods</b></p><p>An interdisciplinary development approach was used involving clinical experts, software engineers, and user experience designers. First, a set of clinically relevant topics where the system should provide warnings, alerts or guidance was identified. These included clinical guidelines and common issues in psychiatric treatment, such as therapeutic effects, side effects and drug interactions. All decision-making processes were translated into rule-based algorithms through close, iterative collaboration with specialists in clinical pharmacology, psychiatry and internal medicine, ensuring the outputs were clinically relevant and trustworthy. In parallel, a user interface was developed in collaboration between programmers, UI/UX experts and clinicians. The design process was similarly iterative: Clinicians highlighted the features most relevant for daily practice and advised on how the tool could be integrated seamlessly into existing workflows.</p><p><b>Results</b></p><p>The resulting system incorporates algorithmic rules across 35 pharmacological domains, enabling more than 400 specific alerts and recommendations relevant to psychiatric care. The underlying IT infrastructure is built to ensure that all patient data is processed and stored locally, with full integration into the existing electronic health record system. This ensures a high level of data security and allows the tool to run quickly and seamlessly within the user's normal workflow. The first
在没有PCI的情况下,二级预防药物治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者1年全因死亡率的趋势和影响:马来西亚国家心血管疾病登记处(NCVD)(2013-2017)的回顾性队列分析Nur Lisa Zaharan, Siti Zaleha Suki2, Abqariyah Yahya3和Ahmad Syadi Mahmood zuhdi41马来西亚国防大学医学和国防卫生学院药理学组;2意大利玛拉理工大学牙科学院临床前科学研究中心(药理学);3马来亚大学医学院社会与预防医学系;4马来西亚大学医学院医学系心内科导论急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)尽管治疗取得了进步,但仍是导致死亡的主要原因(1)。虽然经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)改善了治疗效果,但由于临床、后勤或经济方面的限制,许多患者的治疗都比较保守。在这种情况下,指南指导的药物治疗,如抗血小板,降脂剂(LLAs), β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂是二级预防的核心,以改善长期预后(2,3)。来自多种族、中等收入亚洲地区的非pci患者的处方趋势和死亡率结果的证据有限。本研究考察了(1)不同人口统计学和临床特征的处方模式差异,以及(2)这些药物治疗与1年全因死亡率的关系。方法本回顾性队列研究分析了2013年至2017年马来西亚国家心血管疾病(NCVD-ACS)登记处的数据。纳入因ACS住院但在指数入院期间未接受PCI或冠状动脉旁路移植术的成人(≥18岁)(n = 42 505)。在倾向评分准备和去除5%的数据肢体后,仍有13589例患者。提取人口统计学、临床特征、出院时药物治疗和1年全因死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归评估处方差异,并以95%置信区间(CI)的调整优势比(aOR)表示。使用斯皮尔曼相关检验时间趋势。为了在治疗组中实现混杂因素的平衡分布,使用了逆倾向评分加权(IPSW)。使用ipsw匹配人群的Cox比例风险模型(处方药物治疗或未处方药物治疗)来评估药物治疗使用与1年死亡率之间的关系,报告为校正风险比(aHR), 95% CI。获得了马来西亚卫生部医学审查和伦理委员会的伦理批准。结果13589例非pci ACS患者(平均年龄60岁,男性占76.8%,马来族裔占49.8%,非st段抬高ACS占58.6%),常见危险因素包括高血压(67.2%)、吸烟(56.0%)和糖尿病(47.3%)。服用抗血小板药物的占98.9%(双抗血小板治疗[DAPT]占81.5%),服用LLAs的占88.2%,服用β受体阻滞剂的占63.2%,服用RAS抑制剂的占56.9%。在5年的研究期间,只有DAPT (ρ = 0.026, p =。002)和RAS抑制剂(ρ = 0.040, p <;0.001)处方随着时间的推移显著增加(抗血小板ρ = 0.005, p = 0.533; LLAs ρ = - 0.002, p = 0.849; β受体阻滞剂ρ = - 0.007, p = 0.394)。处方差异很明显,男性比女性更有可能接受所有类别的药物治疗(表1)。年龄较小的患者(45岁)更容易接受抗血小板治疗(aOR 2.284 [1.377-3.790], p =。0.001)和LLAs (aOR 1.575 [1.027-1.538], p =。026)与≥65岁的患者相比。慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者接受LLAs的可能性较低(aOR为0.713 [0.591-0.861];p <;001)和RAS抑制剂(aOR 0.342 [0.295-0.396], p <;001),而入院时出现心源性休克的患者更不可能开抗血小板药,(aOR = 0.252 [0.159-0.400], p <;-受体阻滞剂(aOR 0.319 [0.274-0.370], p <;001)和RAS抑制剂(aOR 0.319 [0.273-0.372], p < .001)。一年全因死亡率为2219例(16.3%)。生存时间- ipsw分析显示,每种药物治疗类别均与降低死亡率独立相关(抗血小板aHR = 0.192 [0.129-0.287]; LLAs aHR = 0.160 [0.137-0.186]; β受体阻滞剂aHR = 0.395 [0.354-0.441]; RAS抑制剂aHR = 0.570 [0.517-0.628]; p <;0001)(表2)。结论循证药物治疗的使用率较高,在女性、印度人和慢性肾病患者等亚组中,抗血小板和LLAs的使用增加,而RAS抑制剂的使用不足。所有药物治疗类别均与较低的1年死亡率独立相关,强调了它们在非pci ACS治疗中的核心作用。 根据M12药物相互作用研究行业指南[1],如果体外研究表明研究产品(IP)可能诱导或抑制CYP酶,则建议使用敏感指数CYP底物进行临床DDI研究。同样,如果IP在体外抑制转运蛋白,建议进行临床DDI研究。许多药物开发人员在临床开发早期探索其知识产权的DDI潜力,并选择无动力研究。然而,一个强有力的研究,与样本量的理由,建议支持无效果的标签声明。给定底物的样本量取决于相关药代动力学(PK)参数的受试者内变异系数(intraCV%)百分比和研究目标(即评估相互作用的大小或确认无影响)。由于药物开发人员可能无法轻易获得这些信息,因此我们在此根据我们之前在健康志愿者研究中对关键底物的经验计算推荐样本量。方法回顾健康志愿者DDI研究中6个CYPs和3个转运体常用底物的数据。最大浓度(Cmax) intraCV%从2020年以来进行的超过25项研究中获得。药物暴露参数(即AUC和Cmax)是DDI研究的典型PK终点;Cmax通常是可变的,因此本文将重点关注该参数以确定适当的样本量。对于每种衬底,使用R程序,使用至少80%的功率,5%的alpha误差和100%的比率计算样品尺寸。功率被定义为在80%-125%的接受标准内,真实几何平均比率(GMR)具有90%置信区间(CI)的概率,反映了这些研究类型的默认无效应边界。结果与ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG)上的行业赞助的健康志愿者DDI研究中列出的样本量进行了比较,这些研究将底物作为独立探针进行管理。CTG样本量报告(n =中位数,25 - 75%)参加DDI研究的参与者。完成底物DDI研究以显示无影响的推荐参与者人数范围为n = 12至66,见表1。Tolbutamide (CYP2C9) Cmax intraCV%最低(10%,n = 12)。另一方面,奥美拉唑(CYP2C19; 35%, n = 42)和右美沙芬(CYP2D6; 45%, n = 66)的变异性最大。我们推荐的样本量与CTG上列出的地高辛(n = 24,18 - 28)、瑞舒伐他汀(n = 28,12 - 33)和咪达唑仑(n = 20,14 - 25)的DDI试验的参与者人数一致。有趣的是,奥美拉唑DDI对CTG的研究(n = 30,14 - 60)的中位数样本量似乎不足,而CTG二甲双胍研究的中位数样本量似乎略高(n = 24,18 - 31)。对于无动力研究,我们通常建议样本量为n = 12-16。在这
{"title":"Selected Abstracts from Pharmacology 2025","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70349","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bcp.70349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>51</b></p><p><b>The good prescriber—Building a clinical decision support system</b></p><p><span>Steffen Skindbjerg Pedersen</span><sup>1</sup>, Tara Hoffmann Faaborg<sup>2</sup>, Signe Wegmann Düring<sup>3,4</sup>, Mikkel Bring Christensen<sup>3,5</sup> and Gesche Jürgens<sup>1,2,3</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Research Unit For Clinical Psychopharmacology, Mental Health Services West, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Zealand University Hospital, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>3</sup><i>Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen;</i> <sup>4</sup><i>Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand;</i> <sup>5</sup><i>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region</i></p><p><b>Introduction</b></p><p>Psychiatric patients are often treated with multiple medications, increasing the risk of side effects, drug–drug interactions and suboptimal treatments. Regular medication reviews are essential for safe prescribing but are time-consuming and difficult to integrate into routine clinical practice.</p><p>To address this, we are developing a Clinical Decision Support System to assist doctors in reviewing and optimizing medications more efficiently. By integrating publicly available drug information with patient-specific data automatically extracted from electronic health records, the system aims to deliver timely, personalized alerts and guidance helping clinicians identify risks and optimize treatment.</p><p><b>Methods</b></p><p>An interdisciplinary development approach was used involving clinical experts, software engineers, and user experience designers. First, a set of clinically relevant topics where the system should provide warnings, alerts or guidance was identified. These included clinical guidelines and common issues in psychiatric treatment, such as therapeutic effects, side effects and drug interactions. All decision-making processes were translated into rule-based algorithms through close, iterative collaboration with specialists in clinical pharmacology, psychiatry and internal medicine, ensuring the outputs were clinically relevant and trustworthy. In parallel, a user interface was developed in collaboration between programmers, UI/UX experts and clinicians. The design process was similarly iterative: Clinicians highlighted the features most relevant for daily practice and advised on how the tool could be integrated seamlessly into existing workflows.</p><p><b>Results</b></p><p>The resulting system incorporates algorithmic rules across 35 pharmacological domains, enabling more than 400 specific alerts and recommendations relevant to psychiatric care. The underlying IT infrastructure is built to ensure that all patient data is processed and stored locally, with full integration into the existing electronic health record system. This ensures a high level of data security and allows the tool to run quickly and seamlessly within the user's normal workflow. The first ","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"92 2","pages":"630-774"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bcp.70349","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145713379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dyfrig A Hughes, Henry Fong, Grace Hampson, Catrin O Plumpton, Chris Sampson
{"title":"Health economic considerations for pharmacogenomic services in the United Kingdom: The Centre for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics.","authors":"Dyfrig A Hughes, Henry Fong, Grace Hampson, Catrin O Plumpton, Chris Sampson","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70412","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145713335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Lise Lotte Gluud, Mattias Mandorfer, Jörn M Schattenberg, Andrea De Gottardi, Annalisa Berzigotti, José Ignacio Fortea, Agustin Albillos Martínez, Edilmar Alvarado-Tapias, Marco Berning, Pawel Petryszyn, Emilia Henricson, Niklas Berglind, Min Lin, Kevin Persson, Anne-Kristina Mercier, Phil Ambery, Jaime Bosch, Jan Oscarsson, Don C Rockey
Aims: Endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonists may reduce cirrhosis-associated portal hypertension (PH). They are associated with fluid retention, which might be mitigated by sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of combining the selective ETA receptor antagonist zibotentan and the selective SGLT2i dapagliflozin were investigated.
Methods: Patients with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) were randomized 1:1 to zibotentan 2.5 mg plus dapagliflozin 10 mg (zibo/dapa) or placebo in a 6-week parallel, double-blind Phase II study. The absolute change in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) from baseline to week 6 was evaluated in the full analysis set using analysis of covariance.
Results: In 28 participants (n = 14 per group), median age was 64 years (range: 37-78), common causes of cirrhosis were metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic (46%) or alcohol-associated liver disease (39%), and 46% were receiving stable doses of non-selective beta-blockers. Baseline HVPG was 6.5-19 mmHg, and 16/28 had clinically significant portal hypertension. Absolute change in HVPG at week 6 was not different between groups (1.02 mmHg [90% CI -0.31, 2.35]). There was a trend towards decreased HVPG in patients with baseline HVPG ≥12 mmHg receiving zibo/dapa. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also reduced by zibo/dapa vs. placebo. Three mild adverse events (peripheral oedema) were reported (zibotentan/dapagliflozin, n = 2; placebo, n = 1). No serious adverse events or drug-induced liver injuries were observed.
Conclusions: Combined zibo/dapa was well tolerated and had a good safety profile in patients with compensated cirrhosis, but had no conclusive effect on HVPG.
{"title":"Effects of zibotentan and dapagliflozin combined in patients with compensated cirrhosis: A randomized placebo-controlled exploratory study.","authors":"Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Lise Lotte Gluud, Mattias Mandorfer, Jörn M Schattenberg, Andrea De Gottardi, Annalisa Berzigotti, José Ignacio Fortea, Agustin Albillos Martínez, Edilmar Alvarado-Tapias, Marco Berning, Pawel Petryszyn, Emilia Henricson, Niklas Berglind, Min Lin, Kevin Persson, Anne-Kristina Mercier, Phil Ambery, Jaime Bosch, Jan Oscarsson, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Endothelin A (ET<sub>A</sub>) receptor antagonists may reduce cirrhosis-associated portal hypertension (PH). They are associated with fluid retention, which might be mitigated by sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of combining the selective ET<sub>A</sub> receptor antagonist zibotentan and the selective SGLT2i dapagliflozin were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) were randomized 1:1 to zibotentan 2.5 mg plus dapagliflozin 10 mg (zibo/dapa) or placebo in a 6-week parallel, double-blind Phase II study. The absolute change in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) from baseline to week 6 was evaluated in the full analysis set using analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 28 participants (n = 14 per group), median age was 64 years (range: 37-78), common causes of cirrhosis were metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic (46%) or alcohol-associated liver disease (39%), and 46% were receiving stable doses of non-selective beta-blockers. Baseline HVPG was 6.5-19 mmHg, and 16/28 had clinically significant portal hypertension. Absolute change in HVPG at week 6 was not different between groups (1.02 mmHg [90% CI -0.31, 2.35]). There was a trend towards decreased HVPG in patients with baseline HVPG ≥12 mmHg receiving zibo/dapa. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also reduced by zibo/dapa vs. placebo. Three mild adverse events (peripheral oedema) were reported (zibotentan/dapagliflozin, n = 2; placebo, n = 1). No serious adverse events or drug-induced liver injuries were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined zibo/dapa was well tolerated and had a good safety profile in patients with compensated cirrhosis, but had no conclusive effect on HVPG.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}