首页 > 最新文献

Annals of integrative molecular medicine最新文献

英文 中文
News from Mars: Two-Tier Paradox, Intracellular PCR, Chimeric Junction Shift, Dark Matter mRNA and Other Remarkable Features of Mammalian RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification. Implications for Alzheimer's Disease, RNA-Based Vaccines and mRNA Therapeutics. 来自火星的消息:双层悖论,细胞内PCR,嵌合结移位,暗物质mRNA和哺乳动物rna依赖的mRNA扩增的其他显着特征。对阿尔茨海默病、rna疫苗和mRNA疗法的启示
Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.02-1009
Vladimir Volloch, Sophia Rits-Volloch

Molecular Biology, a branch of science established to examine the flow of information from "letters" encrypted into DNA structure to functional proteins, was initially defined by a concept of DNA-to-RNA-to-Protein information movement, a notion termed the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. RNA-dependent mRNA amplification, a novel mode of eukaryotic protein-encoding RNA-to-RNA-to-Protein genomic information transfer, constitutes the extension of the Central Dogma in the context of mammalian cells. It was shown to occur in cellular circumstances requiring exceptionally high levels of production of specific polypeptides, e.g. globin chains during erythroid differentiation or defined secreted proteins in the context of extracellular matrix deposition. Its potency is reflected in the observed cellular levels of the resulting amplified mRNA product: At the peak of the erythroid differentiation, for example, the amount of globin mRNA produced in the amplification pathway is about 1500-fold higher than the amount of its conventionally generated counterpart in the same cells. The cellular enzymatic machinery at the core of this process, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity (RdRp), albeit in a non-conventional form, was shown to be constitutively and ubiquitously present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis (RdRs) appeared to regularly occur, in mammalian cells. Under most circumstances, the mammalian RdRp activity produces only short antisense RNA transcripts. Generation of complete antisense RNA transcripts and amplification of mRNA molecules require the activation of inducible components of the mammalian RdRp complex. The mechanism of such activation is not clear. The present article suggests that it is triggered by a variety of cellular stresses and occurs in the context of stress responses in general and within the framework of the integrated stress response (ISR) in particular. In this process, various cellular stresses activate, in a stress type-specific manner, defined members of the mammalian translation initiation factor 2α, eIF2α, kinase family: PKR, GCN2, PERK and HRI. Any of these kinases, in an activated form, phosphorylates eIF2α. This results in suppression of global cellular protein synthesis but also in activation of expression of select group of transcription factors including ATF4, ATF5 and CHOP. These transcription factors either function as inducible components of the RdRp complex or enable their expression. The assembly of the competent RdRp complex activates mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification, which appears to be a two-tier process. Tier One is a "chimeric" pathway, named so because it results in an amplified chimeric mRNA molecule containing a fragment of the antisense RNA strand at its 5' terminus. Tier Two further amplifies one of the two RNA end products of the chimeric pathway and constitutes the physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR. Depending on the structure of the initial mRNA

分子生物学是一门旨在研究从加密到DNA结构的“字母”到功能性蛋白质的信息流的科学分支,它最初是由DNA- rna -蛋白质信息运动的概念定义的,这个概念被称为分子生物学的中心法则。rna依赖性mRNA扩增是真核蛋白编码RNA-to-RNA-to-Protein基因组信息传递的一种新模式,在哺乳动物细胞中构成了中心法则的延伸。它被证明发生在细胞环境中,需要特别高水平的特定多肽的生产,例如红系分化期间的珠蛋白链或细胞外基质沉积中确定的分泌蛋白。其效力反映在观察到的扩增mRNA产物的细胞水平上:例如,在红细胞分化的高峰期,扩增途径中产生的珠蛋白mRNA的数量比在相同细胞中常规产生的对应量高出约1500倍。这一过程的核心是细胞酶机制,RNA依赖的RNA聚合酶活性(RdRp),尽管是以非常规的形式存在,但被证明是组成性和普遍存在的,RNA依赖的RNA合成(RdRs)似乎经常发生在哺乳动物细胞中。在大多数情况下,哺乳动物RdRp活性仅产生短反义RNA转录物。生成完整的反义RNA转录物和扩增mRNA分子需要激活哺乳动物RdRp复合体的诱导成分。这种激活的机制尚不清楚。本文表明,它是由各种细胞应激触发的,一般发生在应激反应的背景下,特别是在综合应激反应(ISR)的框架内。在这个过程中,各种细胞应激以应激类型特异性的方式激活了哺乳动物翻译起始因子2α、eIF2α、激酶家族的定义成员:PKR、GCN2、PERK和HRI。这些激酶中的任何一种,在被激活的形式下,都能使eIF2α磷酸化。这导致整体细胞蛋白合成受到抑制,但也激活了包括ATF4、ATF5和CHOP在内的特定转录因子组的表达。这些转录因子要么作为RdRp复合物的诱导成分发挥作用,要么使其表达。胜任RdRp复合物的组装激活哺乳动物rna依赖的mRNA扩增,这似乎是一个双层过程。第一层是“嵌合”途径,之所以如此命名,是因为它会产生一个扩增的嵌合mRNA分子,在其5'端含有反义RNA链的片段。第二层进一步扩增嵌合途径的两个RNA终产物之一,并构成生理上发生的细胞内聚合酶链反应(iPCR)。根据初始mRNA扩增祖细胞的结构,第一级嵌合途径可能导致多种结果,包括嵌合mRNA产生与原始常规mRNA祖细胞编码蛋白相同的多肽或仅产生其c端片段CTF。第一层的嵌合RNA最终产物也可能产生基因组中非连续编码的多肽,激活从开放阅读框的翻译,这在常规转录的mRNA中是“沉默的”,或者引发翻译失败。与之形成鲜明对比的是,无论第一层的结果如何,哺乳动物mRNA扩增的第二层的mRNA最终产物,即iPCR途径,总是产生与传统mRNA祖编码蛋白相同的多肽。这种不协调被称为两层悖论,并在本文中详细讨论。另一方面,这两层的相似之处在于,它们产生了对逆转录具有抗性的严重修饰的mRNA分子,无法通过基于逆转录的测序方法检测到,因此构成了众所周知的“暗物质”mRNA,尽管它们非常普遍。除了它们的其他功能外,扩增的mRNA的修饰使其在翻译中与磷酸化的eIF2α兼容,这与细胞的大部分mRNA不同,这意味着扩增的mRNA除了由于其产生方法而异常丰富外,还优先在ISR条件下被翻译,从而提高了扩增过程的效率。在正常生理中,蛋白质编码基因组信息扩增的强大机制的重要性是不言而喻的。它们的故障或误用似乎与两种类型的异常有关,一种是由这些机制正常产生的蛋白质缺乏,另一种是由mRNA扩增介导的蛋白质过度产生,而这种蛋白质通常不是由这种机制产生的。 某些类型的β -地中海贫血是第一种类型的例子,而第二种类型的代表是阿尔茨海默病中β -淀粉样蛋白的过量产生。此外,提出的阿尔茨海默病的机制允许一个关键的和可验证的预测,即致病的神经内保留的β -淀粉样蛋白变体不同于βAPP蛋白水解常规产生的变体,因为它在其n端含有额外的蛋氨酸或乙酰化的蛋氨酸。由于其作为mRNA扩增途径的天然报告基因的非凡证据价值,如果这一特征得到证实,可以说,它不仅是阿尔茨海默病的圣杯,也是哺乳动物rna依赖性mRNA扩增领域的圣杯。本文详细讨论了这两个例子,总结并系统化了我们目前对该领域的理解,并描述了两类报告基因结构,一种用于mRNA扩增的嵌合层,另一种用于iPCR途径;这两种报告类型对于阐明潜在的分子机制都是必不可少的。鉴于最近证明的基于rna的疫苗的可行性,该研究还表明,通过诱导或自然发生的rna依赖的mRNA扩增途径,外源引入的符合扩增条件的抗原编码mRNA在细胞内靶向扩增,可能对触发快速有效的免疫反应具有重大益处,并有助于未来疫苗的开发。在mRNA治疗中,类似的方法也可以有效地实现外源mRNA的高效和持续表达。
{"title":"News from Mars: Two-Tier Paradox, Intracellular PCR, Chimeric Junction Shift, Dark Matter mRNA and Other Remarkable Features of Mammalian RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification. Implications for Alzheimer's Disease, RNA-Based Vaccines and mRNA Therapeutics.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch,&nbsp;Sophia Rits-Volloch","doi":"10.33597/aimm.02-1009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33597/aimm.02-1009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular Biology, a branch of science established to examine the flow of information from \"letters\" encrypted into DNA structure to functional proteins, was initially defined by a concept of DNA-to-RNA-to-Protein information movement, a notion termed the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. RNA-dependent mRNA amplification, a novel mode of eukaryotic protein-encoding RNA-to-RNA-to-Protein genomic information transfer, constitutes the extension of the Central Dogma in the context of mammalian cells. It was shown to occur in cellular circumstances requiring exceptionally high levels of production of specific polypeptides, e.g. globin chains during erythroid differentiation or defined secreted proteins in the context of extracellular matrix deposition. Its potency is reflected in the observed cellular levels of the resulting amplified mRNA product: At the peak of the erythroid differentiation, for example, the amount of globin mRNA produced in the amplification pathway is about 1500-fold higher than the amount of its conventionally generated counterpart in the same cells. The cellular enzymatic machinery at the core of this process, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity (RdRp), albeit in a non-conventional form, was shown to be constitutively and ubiquitously present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis (RdRs) appeared to regularly occur, in mammalian cells. Under most circumstances, the mammalian RdRp activity produces only short antisense RNA transcripts. Generation of complete antisense RNA transcripts and amplification of mRNA molecules require the activation of inducible components of the mammalian RdRp complex. The mechanism of such activation is not clear. The present article suggests that it is triggered by a variety of cellular stresses and occurs in the context of stress responses in general and within the framework of the integrated stress response (ISR) in particular. In this process, various cellular stresses activate, in a stress type-specific manner, defined members of the mammalian translation initiation factor 2α, eIF2α, kinase family: PKR, GCN2, PERK and HRI. Any of these kinases, in an activated form, phosphorylates eIF2α. This results in suppression of global cellular protein synthesis but also in activation of expression of select group of transcription factors including ATF4, ATF5 and CHOP. These transcription factors either function as inducible components of the RdRp complex or enable their expression. The assembly of the competent RdRp complex activates mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification, which appears to be a two-tier process. Tier One is a \"chimeric\" pathway, named so because it results in an amplified chimeric mRNA molecule containing a fragment of the antisense RNA strand at its 5' terminus. Tier Two further amplifies one of the two RNA end products of the chimeric pathway and constitutes the physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR. Depending on the structure of the initial mRNA ","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"2 ","pages":"131-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088752/pdf/nihms-1678981.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38944670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Alzheimer's Disease is Driven by Intraneuronally Retained Beta-Amyloid Produced in the AD-Specific, βAPP-Independent Pathway: Current Perspective and Experimental Models for Tomorrow. 阿尔茨海默病是由神经元内滞留的β-淀粉样蛋白驱动的,这种β-淀粉样蛋白是通过AD特异性、βAPP依赖性途径产生的:当前视角与未来实验模型》。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.02-1007
Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn Olsen, Sophia Rits

A view of the origin and progression of Alzheimer's disease, AD, prevailing until now and formalized as the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis theory, maintains that the disease is initiated by overproduction of beta-amyloid, Aβ, which is generated solely by the Aβ precursor protein, βAPP, proteolytic pathway and secreted from the cell. Consequent extracellular accumulation of Aβ triggers a cascade of molecular and cellular events leading to neurodegeneration that starts early in life, progresses as one prolonged process, builds up for decades, and culminates in symptomatic manifestations of the disease late in life. In this paradigm, a time window for commencement of therapeutic intervention is small and accessible only early in life. The outlook introduced in the present study is fundamentally different. It posits that the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway of Aβ production causes AD in humans no more than it does in either short- or long-lived non-human mammals that share this pathway with humans, accumulate beta-amyloid as they age, but do not develop the disease. Alzheimer's disease, according to this outlook, is driven by an additional powerful AD-specific pathway of Aβ production that operates in affected humans, is completely independent of the βAPP precursor, and is not available in non-human mammals. The role of the βAPP proteolytic pathway in the disease in humans is activation of this additional AD-specific Aβ production pathway. This occurs through accumulation of intracellular Aβ, primarily via ApoE-assisted cellular uptake of secreted beta-amyloid, but also through retention of a fraction of Aβ produced in the βAPP proteolytic pathway. With time, accumulated intracellular Aβ triggers mitochondrial dysfunction. In turn, cellular stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, including ER stress, activate a second, AD-specific, Aβ production pathway: Asymmetric RNA-dependent βAPP mRNA amplification; animal βAPP mRNA is ineligible for this process. In this pathway, every conventionally produced βAPP mRNA molecule serves potentially as a template for production of severely 5'-truncated mRNA encoding not the βAPP but its C99 fragment (hence "asymmetric"), the immediate precursor of Aβ. Thus produced, N-terminal signal peptide-lacking C99 is processed not in the secretory pathway on the plasma membrane, but at the intracellular membrane sites, apparently in a neuron-specific manner. The resulting Aβ is, therefore, not secreted but is retained intraneuronally and accumulates rapidly within the cell. Increased levels of intracellular Aβ augment mitochondrial dysfunction, which, in turn, sustains the activity of the βAPP mRNA amplification pathway. These self-propagating mutual Aβ overproduction/mitochondrial dysfunction feedback cycles constitute a formidable two-stroke engine, an engine that drives Alzheimer's disease. The present outlook envisions Alzheimer's disorder as a two-stage disease. The first stage is a slow process of intrac

这些模型结合了 Aβ 或 C99 编码 mRNA 扩增产生 Aβ 的途径,以及其产物在细胞内的滞留,不仅可以支持对注意力缺失症分子机制的进一步研究,还可以针对本研究提出的治疗靶点筛选和测试候选药物。
{"title":"Alzheimer's Disease is Driven by Intraneuronally Retained Beta-Amyloid Produced in the AD-Specific, βAPP-Independent Pathway: Current Perspective and Experimental Models for Tomorrow.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn Olsen, Sophia Rits","doi":"10.33597/aimm.02-1007","DOIUrl":"10.33597/aimm.02-1007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A view of the origin and progression of Alzheimer's disease, AD, prevailing until now and formalized as the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis theory, maintains that the disease is initiated by overproduction of beta-amyloid, Aβ, which is generated solely by the Aβ precursor protein, βAPP, proteolytic pathway and secreted from the cell. Consequent extracellular accumulation of Aβ triggers a cascade of molecular and cellular events leading to neurodegeneration that starts early in life, progresses as one prolonged process, builds up for decades, and culminates in symptomatic manifestations of the disease late in life. In this paradigm, a time window for commencement of therapeutic intervention is small and accessible only early in life. The outlook introduced in the present study is fundamentally different. It posits that the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway of Aβ production causes AD in humans no more than it does in either short- or long-lived non-human mammals that share this pathway with humans, accumulate beta-amyloid as they age, but do not develop the disease. Alzheimer's disease, according to this outlook, is driven by an additional powerful AD-specific pathway of Aβ production that operates in affected humans, is completely independent of the βAPP precursor, and is not available in non-human mammals. The role of the βAPP proteolytic pathway in the disease in humans is activation of this additional AD-specific Aβ production pathway. This occurs through accumulation of intracellular Aβ, primarily via ApoE-assisted cellular uptake of secreted beta-amyloid, but also through retention of a fraction of Aβ produced in the βAPP proteolytic pathway. With time, accumulated intracellular Aβ triggers mitochondrial dysfunction. In turn, cellular stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, including ER stress, activate a second, AD-specific, Aβ production pathway: Asymmetric RNA-dependent βAPP mRNA amplification; animal βAPP mRNA is ineligible for this process. In this pathway, every conventionally produced βAPP mRNA molecule serves potentially as a template for production of severely 5'-truncated mRNA encoding not the βAPP but its C99 fragment (hence \"asymmetric\"), the immediate precursor of Aβ. Thus produced, N-terminal signal peptide-lacking C99 is processed not in the secretory pathway on the plasma membrane, but at the intracellular membrane sites, apparently in a neuron-specific manner. The resulting Aβ is, therefore, not secreted but is retained intraneuronally and accumulates rapidly within the cell. Increased levels of intracellular Aβ augment mitochondrial dysfunction, which, in turn, sustains the activity of the βAPP mRNA amplification pathway. These self-propagating mutual Aβ overproduction/mitochondrial dysfunction feedback cycles constitute a formidable two-stroke engine, an engine that drives Alzheimer's disease. The present outlook envisions Alzheimer's disorder as a two-stage disease. The first stage is a slow process of intrac","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"90-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331974/pdf/nihms-1588124.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38113041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AD "Statin": Alzheimer's Disorder is a "Fast" Disease Preventable by Therapeutic Intervention Initiated Even Late in Life and Reversible at the Early Stages. AD“他汀类药物”:阿尔茨海默病是一种“快速”疾病,即使在生命晚期也可以通过治疗干预来预防,并且在早期阶段是可逆的。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.02-1006
Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn R Olsen, Sophia Rits

The present study posits that Alzheimer's disorder is a "fast" disease. This is in sharp contrast to a view, prevailing until now, that Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a quintessential "slow" disease that develops throughout the life as one prolonged process. According to this view, beta-amyloid (Aβ) is produced and secreted solely by the beta-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) proteolytic/secretory pathway. As its extracellular levels increase, it triggers neurodegeneration starting relatively early in life. Damages accumulate and manifest, late in life in sporadic Alzheimer's Disease (SAD) cases, as AD symptoms. In familial AD (FAD) cases, where mutations in βAPP gene or in presenilins increase production of either common Aβ isoform or of its more toxic isoforms, neurodegeneration reaches critical threshold sooner and AD symptoms occur earlier in life, mostly in late 40s and 50s. There are currently no preventive AD therapies but if they were available, according to this viewpoint it would be largely futile to intervene late in life in case of potential SAD or at mid-age in cases of FAD because, although AD symptoms have not yet manifested, the damage has already occurred during the preceding decades. In this paradigm, to be effective, preventive therapeutic intervention should be initiated early in life. The outlook suggested by the present study is radically different. According to it, Alzheimer's disease evolves in two stages. The first stage is a slow process of intracellular beta-amyloid accumulation. It occurs via βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway and cellular uptake of secreted Aβ common to Homo sapiens, including healthy humans, and to non-human mammals, and results neither in significant damage, nor in manifestation of the disease. The second stage occurs exclusively in humans, commences shortly before symptomatic onset of the disease, sharply accelerates the production and increases intracellular levels of Aβ that is not secreted but is retained intracellularly, generates significant damages, triggers AD symptoms, and is fast. It is driven by an Aβ generation pathway qualitatively and quantitatively different from βAPP proteolytic process and entirely independent of beta-amyloid precursor protein, and results in rapid and substantial intracellular accumulation of Aβ, consequent significant neurodegeneration, and symptomatic AD. In this paradigm, a preventive therapy for AD, an AD "statin", would be effective when initiated at any time prior to commencement of the second stage. Moreover, there are good reasons to believe that with a drug blocking βAPP-independent Aβ production pathway in the second stage, it would be possible not only to preempt the disease but also to stop and to reverse it even when early AD symptoms have already manifested. The present study posits a notion of AD as a Fast Disease, offers evidence for the occurrence of the AD-specific Aβ production pathway, describes cellular and molecular processes constitu

目前的研究假设阿尔茨海默病是一种“快速”疾病。这与目前流行的一种观点形成鲜明对比,即阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种典型的“缓慢”疾病,在整个生命中作为一个长期过程发展。根据这一观点,β -淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)仅通过β -淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白(βAPP)蛋白水解/分泌途径产生和分泌。随着其细胞外水平的增加,它会在相对较早的时候引发神经变性。在散发性阿尔茨海默病(SAD)病例中,损害累积并表现为AD症状。在家族性AD (FAD)病例中,βAPP基因或早老素突变会增加常见Aβ异构体或其毒性更强的异构体的产生,神经退行性变会更快达到临界阈值,AD症状会在生命中更早出现,主要发生在40多岁和50多岁。目前还没有预防性的AD治疗方法,但如果有的话,根据这一观点,在晚年干预潜在的SAD或中年干预FAD基本上是徒劳的,因为尽管AD症状尚未表现出来,但损害已经在过去的几十年里发生了。在这种模式下,为了有效,预防性治疗干预应该在生命早期开始。目前的研究显示的前景是完全不同的。根据该研究,阿尔茨海默病的发展分为两个阶段。第一阶段是细胞内β -淀粉样蛋白积累的缓慢过程。它通过βAPP蛋白水解/分泌途径和细胞摄取分泌的Aβ发生,这在智人(包括健康人)和非人类哺乳动物中都是常见的,不会导致显著损伤,也不会表现为疾病。第二阶段只发生在人身上,在疾病症状发作前不久开始,急剧加速产生并增加细胞内Aβ的水平,Aβ不分泌但保留在细胞内,产生显著损害,引发AD症状,并且速度很快。它是由一个在质和量上不同于βAPP蛋白水解过程的Aβ生成途径驱动的,完全独立于β淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白,导致Aβ在细胞内快速和大量积累,从而导致显著的神经变性和症状性AD。在这种模式下,AD的预防性治疗,即AD“他汀类药物”,在第二阶段开始前的任何时间开始都是有效的。此外,有充分的理由相信,在第二阶段阻断β app独立的a β产生途径的药物不仅可以预防疾病,而且可以在早期AD症状已经表现出来的情况下阻止和逆转疾病。目前的研究假设了AD是一种快速疾病的概念,为AD特异性a β产生途径的发生提供了证据,描述了构成驱动阿尔茨海默病的引擎的细胞和分子过程,并解释了为什么非人类哺乳动物不易感染AD以及为什么只有一小部分人类会患上该疾病。它确立了阿尔茨海默病是可以通过治疗干预来预防的,甚至是在生命的后期,详细描述了这种疾病的强大机制,表明β app独立通路中产生的a β保留在细胞内,阐述了为什么BACE抑制和a β免疫疗法都不能有效治疗AD,以及为什么细胞内保留的β -淀粉样蛋白可能是阿尔茨海默病神经元死亡的主要原因。这就需要建立一种能够通过βAPP非依赖性途径产生a β的新型AD动物模型,提出了与之前所追求的βAPP蛋白水解途径组分截然不同的治疗靶点,并为设计既可用于预防又可用于治疗和逆转疾病早期阶段的药物提供了概念基础。
{"title":"AD \"Statin\": Alzheimer's Disorder is a \"Fast\" Disease Preventable by Therapeutic Intervention Initiated Even Late in Life and Reversible at the Early Stages.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn R Olsen, Sophia Rits","doi":"10.33597/aimm.02-1006","DOIUrl":"10.33597/aimm.02-1006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study posits that Alzheimer's disorder is a \"fast\" disease. This is in sharp contrast to a view, prevailing until now, that Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a quintessential \"slow\" disease that develops throughout the life as one prolonged process. According to this view, beta-amyloid (Aβ) is produced and secreted solely by the beta-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) proteolytic/secretory pathway. As its extracellular levels increase, it triggers neurodegeneration starting relatively early in life. Damages accumulate and manifest, late in life in sporadic Alzheimer's Disease (SAD) cases, as AD symptoms. In familial AD (FAD) cases, where mutations in βAPP gene or in presenilins increase production of either common Aβ isoform or of its more toxic isoforms, neurodegeneration reaches critical threshold sooner and AD symptoms occur earlier in life, mostly in late 40s and 50s. There are currently no preventive AD therapies but if they were available, according to this viewpoint it would be largely futile to intervene late in life in case of potential SAD or at mid-age in cases of FAD because, although AD symptoms have not yet manifested, the damage has already occurred during the preceding decades. In this paradigm, to be effective, preventive therapeutic intervention should be initiated early in life. The outlook suggested by the present study is radically different. According to it, Alzheimer's disease evolves in two stages. The first stage is a slow process of intracellular beta-amyloid accumulation. It occurs via βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway and cellular uptake of secreted Aβ common to <i>Homo sapiens</i>, including healthy humans, and to non-human mammals, and results neither in significant damage, nor in manifestation of the disease. The second stage occurs exclusively in humans, commences shortly before symptomatic onset of the disease, sharply accelerates the production and increases intracellular levels of Aβ that is not secreted but is retained intracellularly, generates significant damages, triggers AD symptoms, and is fast. It is driven by an Aβ generation pathway qualitatively and quantitatively different from βAPP proteolytic process and entirely independent of beta-amyloid precursor protein, and results in rapid and substantial intracellular accumulation of Aβ, consequent significant neurodegeneration, and symptomatic AD. In this paradigm, a preventive therapy for AD, an AD \"statin\", would be effective when initiated at any time prior to commencement of the second stage. Moreover, there are good reasons to believe that with a drug blocking βAPP-independent Aβ production pathway in the second stage, it would be possible not only to preempt the disease but also to stop and to reverse it even when early AD symptoms have already manifested. The present study posits a notion of AD as a Fast Disease, offers evidence for the occurrence of the AD-specific Aβ production pathway, describes cellular and molecular processes constitu","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"75-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083596/pdf/nihms-1069397.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37763062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Alzheimer's Disease Prevention and Treatment: Case for Optimism. 阿尔茨海默病的预防和治疗:乐观的理由。
Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.02-1008
Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn Olsen, Sophia Rits
A paradigm shift is under way in the Alzheimer's field. A view of Alzheimer's disease, AD, prevailing until now, the old paradigm, maintains that it is initiated and driven by the overproduction and extracellular accumulation of beta-amyloid, Aβ; a peptide assumed to be derived, both in health and disease, solely by proteolysis of its large precursor, βAPP. In AD, according to this view, Aβ overproduction-associated neurodegeneration begins early, accumulates throughout the lifespan, and manifests symptomatically late in life. A number of drugs, designed within the framework of exceptionality of the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway in Aβ production in Alzheimer's disease, achieved spectacular successes in treatment, even the reversal, of AD symptoms in animal models. Without exception, they all exhibited equally spectacular failures in human clinical trials. This paradigm provides few causes for optimism with regard to prevention and treatment of AD. In its context, the disease is considered untreatable in the symptomatic phase; even prodromal cases are assumed too advanced for treatment because Aβ-triggered damages have been accumulating for preceding decades, presumably starting in the early twenties and, to be effective, this is when therapeutic intervention should commence and continue for life. The new paradigm does not dispute the seminal role of Aβ in AD but posits that beta-amyloid produced in the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway causes AD in humans no more than it does in non-human mammals that share this pathway with humans, accumulate Aβ as they age, but do not develop the disease. Alzheimer's disease, according to this outlook, is driven by the AD-specific pathway of Aβ production, independent of βAPP and absent in animals. Its activation, late in life, occurs through accumulation, via both cellular uptake of secreted Aβ and neuronal retention of a fraction of beta-amyloid produced in the βAPP proteolytic pathway, of intraneuronal Aβ, which triggers mitochondrial dysfunction. Cellular stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, or, probably, the integrated stress response, ISR, elicited by it, activate an AD-specific Aβ production pathway. In it, every conventionally produced βAPP mRNA molecule potentially serves repeatedly as a template for production of severely 5'-truncated mRNA encoding C99 fragment of βAPP, the immediate precursor of Aβ that is processed in a non-secretory pathway, apparently in a neuron-specific manner. The resulting intraneuronally retained Aβ augments mitochondrial dysfunction, which, in turn, sustains the activity of the βAPP mRNA amplification pathway. These self-propagating Aβ overproduction/mitochondrial dysfunction mutual feedback cycles constitute the engine that drives AD and ultimately triggers neuronal death. In this paradigm, preventive treatment can be initiated any time prior to commencement of βAPP mRNA amplification. Moreover, there are good reasons to believe that with a drug blockin
阿尔茨海默病领域正在发生范式转变。到目前为止,对阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一种观点,即旧的范式,认为它是由β -淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)的过度生产和细胞外积累引发和驱动的;一种被认为在健康和疾病中仅由其大前体βAPP的蛋白水解而产生的肽。根据这一观点,在阿尔茨海默病中,与Aβ过量产生相关的神经退行性变很早就开始了,在整个生命周期中积累,并在生命后期表现出症状。在阿尔茨海默病中β β产生的βAPP蛋白水解/分泌途径的特殊框架内设计的许多药物在动物模型中治疗甚至逆转AD症状方面取得了惊人的成功。无一例外,它们都在人体临床试验中表现出同样惊人的失败。这一范例在预防和治疗阿尔茨海默病方面提供了一些乐观的理由。在这种情况下,该病在症状期被认为是不可治疗的;即使是前驱症状的病例也被认为太迟,无法治疗,因为a β引发的损害已经积累了几十年,大概从20岁出头开始,为了有效,这是治疗干预应该开始并持续一生的时候。新的范式并没有质疑β β在AD中的重要作用,但假设βAPP蛋白水解/分泌途径中产生的β -淀粉样蛋白在人类中引起AD并不比在非人类哺乳动物中引起AD多,这些哺乳动物与人类共享这一途径,随着年龄的增长积累Aβ,但不会发病。根据这一观点,阿尔茨海默病是由ad特异性的Aβ产生途径驱动的,独立于βAPP,在动物中不存在。在生命后期,它的激活通过积累发生,通过细胞摄取分泌的a β和神经元保留在βAPP蛋白水解途径中产生的部分β -淀粉样蛋白,从而触发线粒体功能障碍。与线粒体功能障碍相关的细胞应激,或者可能是由其引发的综合应激反应(ISR),激活了ad特异性的Aβ生成途径。在该研究中,每一个常规生产的βAPP mRNA分子都可能反复作为严重截断的βAPP C99片段mRNA的模板,βAPP C99片段是a β的直接前体,在非分泌途径中加工,显然以神经元特异性的方式进行。由此产生的神经元内保留的Aβ增强了线粒体功能障碍,这反过来又维持了βAPP mRNA扩增途径的活性。这些自我繁殖的Aβ过量生产/线粒体功能障碍相互反馈循环构成了驱动AD并最终引发神经元死亡的引擎。在这种情况下,预防性治疗可以在βAPP mRNA扩增开始前的任何时间开始。此外,有充分的理由相信,通过阻断扩增途径的药物,不仅可以预防疾病,而且可以在早期AD症状已经表现出来的情况下阻止和逆转疾病。因此,新范式引入了阿尔茨海默病的新理论。它解释了观察到的不一致,确定了明确的治疗靶点,为新一代概念上不同的AD模型提供了蓝图,并指定了mRNA扩增途径的报告基因的设计。最重要的是,它为疾病的预防和早期症状阶段的治疗提供了详细的指导和切实的希望。
{"title":"Alzheimer's Disease Prevention and Treatment: Case for Optimism.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch,&nbsp;Bjorn Olsen,&nbsp;Sophia Rits","doi":"10.33597/aimm.02-1008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33597/aimm.02-1008","url":null,"abstract":"A paradigm shift is under way in the Alzheimer's field. A view of Alzheimer's disease, AD, prevailing until now, the old paradigm, maintains that it is initiated and driven by the overproduction and extracellular accumulation of beta-amyloid, Aβ; a peptide assumed to be derived, both in health and disease, solely by proteolysis of its large precursor, βAPP. In AD, according to this view, Aβ overproduction-associated neurodegeneration begins early, accumulates throughout the lifespan, and manifests symptomatically late in life. A number of drugs, designed within the framework of exceptionality of the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway in Aβ production in Alzheimer's disease, achieved spectacular successes in treatment, even the reversal, of AD symptoms in animal models. Without exception, they all exhibited equally spectacular failures in human clinical trials. This paradigm provides few causes for optimism with regard to prevention and treatment of AD. In its context, the disease is considered untreatable in the symptomatic phase; even prodromal cases are assumed too advanced for treatment because Aβ-triggered damages have been accumulating for preceding decades, presumably starting in the early twenties and, to be effective, this is when therapeutic intervention should commence and continue for life. The new paradigm does not dispute the seminal role of Aβ in AD but posits that beta-amyloid produced in the βAPP proteolytic/secretory pathway causes AD in humans no more than it does in non-human mammals that share this pathway with humans, accumulate Aβ as they age, but do not develop the disease. Alzheimer's disease, according to this outlook, is driven by the AD-specific pathway of Aβ production, independent of βAPP and absent in animals. Its activation, late in life, occurs through accumulation, via both cellular uptake of secreted Aβ and neuronal retention of a fraction of beta-amyloid produced in the βAPP proteolytic pathway, of intraneuronal Aβ, which triggers mitochondrial dysfunction. Cellular stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, or, probably, the integrated stress response, ISR, elicited by it, activate an AD-specific Aβ production pathway. In it, every conventionally produced βAPP mRNA molecule potentially serves repeatedly as a template for production of severely 5'-truncated mRNA encoding C99 fragment of βAPP, the immediate precursor of Aβ that is processed in a non-secretory pathway, apparently in a neuron-specific manner. The resulting intraneuronally retained Aβ augments mitochondrial dysfunction, which, in turn, sustains the activity of the βAPP mRNA amplification pathway. These self-propagating Aβ overproduction/mitochondrial dysfunction mutual feedback cycles constitute the engine that drives AD and ultimately triggers neuronal death. In this paradigm, preventive treatment can be initiated any time prior to commencement of βAPP mRNA amplification. Moreover, there are good reasons to believe that with a drug blockin","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"115-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546530/pdf/nihms-1630056.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38477699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Alzheimer’s Disease is Driven by Beta-Amyloid Generated in the Amyloid Precursor Protein-Independent Pathway and Retained Intraneuronally: Research and Therapeutic Strategies in a New AD Paradigm 阿尔茨海默病是由淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白独立通路中产生的β -淀粉样蛋白驱动并保留在神经内:一种新的AD范式的研究和治疗策略
Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.-v2-id1010
V. Volloch, Sophia Rits-Volloch
Abstract The present article describes a New Paradigm of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the Old Paradigm, formalized in the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH) theory of AD, beta amyloid (Aβ) is produced, both in health and disease, solely in the amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) proteolytic/secretory pathway. Two βAPP cleavages are involved. First cleavage, by beta-secretase (Beta-site APP Cleaving Enzyme, BACE) between Met671 and Asp672 (numbering according to the βAPP770 isoform), generates the C-terminal fragment of βAPP (C99, reflecting the number of its amino acid residues) and forms the N-terminus of Aβ. Subsequent second cleavage of C99 by gamma-secretase (gamma-site βAPP cleaving enzyme) forms the C-terminus of Aβ, completes its production, and coincides with its secretion. The overproduction of Aβ results in its extracellular accumulation commencing early in life. This triggers a cascade of molecular and cellular events, including formation of neurofibrillary tangles, which results in neurodegeneration. When the extent of neurodegeneration reaches critical levels, symptoms of the disease are manifested. In this Paradigm, Alzheimer’s disorder is a quintessential “slow” disease. The ACH clearly defined therapeutic targets, which included key events of βAPP proteolysis as well as secreted extracellular Aβ. Eventually, a number of candidate AD drugs, highly effective in animal model systems, was developed. Of those, especially successful were inhibitors of beta-sectretase that not only prevented the emergence of AD symptoms, but also reversed them when administered after symptomatic manifestation of the disease in animal models. At this point, there was every reason to hope that a solution to the Alzheimer’s problem is at hand; this, however proved not to be the case. Both the Old and the New Paradigms share the common point of departure, namely that the overproduction of beta-amyloid is the causative basis of AD. The rest of the notions of the New Paradigm are distinctly different from those of the Old one. Formulation of the New Paradigm theory of Alzheimer’s disease was necessitated by the analysis of results of massive human clinical trials of candidate AD drugs that performed outstandingly in animal studies. They all failed in human trials as spectacularly as they succeeded in animal studies. Or did they? Whereas they indeed showed no efficacy whatsoever, they performed perfectly within confines of their design and purpose. For example, a BACE inhibitor verubecestat penetrated the brain of AD patients, greatly inhibited βAPP cleavage, and strongly suppressed extracellular levels of Aβ. It did all this with the same efficiency it exhibited in animal studies, where it indisputably succeeded in mitigating symptoms of the disease. Why did it fail to do so in human clinical trials? This failure, apparently inexplicable within the confines of the ACH, seems as good an occasion as any to apply the central dictum of Sherlock Holmes: “... when you el
摘要:本文描述了阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一种新范式。在旧范式中,在AD的淀粉样蛋白级联假说(ACH)理论中形式化,在健康和疾病中,β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)仅在淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白(βAPP)蛋白水解/分泌途径中产生。其中涉及两个βAPP裂解。首先,β -分泌酶(β -site APP cleicing Enzyme, BACE)在Met671和Asp672之间(根据βAPP770同工型编号)进行切割,生成βAPP的c端片段(C99,反映其氨基酸残基的数量),并形成Aβ的n端。随后,γ -分泌酶(γ -site βAPP切割酶)对C99进行第二次切割,形成Aβ的c端,完成其产生,并与其分泌一致。Aβ的过量产生导致其在生命早期就开始在细胞外积累。这引发了一系列分子和细胞事件,包括神经原纤维缠结的形成,从而导致神经变性。当神经退行性变的程度达到临界水平时,疾病的症状就会显现出来。在这种范式中,阿尔茨海默病是一种典型的“缓慢”疾病。ACH明确了治疗靶点,包括βAPP蛋白水解的关键事件以及分泌的细胞外Aβ。最终,一些候选的AD药物被开发出来,在动物模型系统中非常有效。其中,特别成功的是β -分泌酶抑制剂,它不仅可以防止阿尔茨海默病症状的出现,而且在动物模型中疾病症状出现后给药可以逆转症状。在这一点上,有充分的理由希望解决阿尔茨海默病的问题近在咫尺;然而,事实证明并非如此。旧范式和新范式都有一个共同的出发点,即β -淀粉样蛋白的过量产生是阿尔茨海默病的病因基础。新范式的其他概念与旧范式的概念明显不同。阿尔茨海默病新范式理论的形成,是对在动物研究中表现出色的候选阿尔茨海默病药物的大量人体临床试验结果的分析所必需的。它们都在人体试验中失败了,就像它们在动物试验中成功一样。或者是真的吗?尽管它们确实没有显示出任何功效,但在它们的设计和目的范围内,它们表现得很好。例如,一种BACE抑制剂verubecestat穿透AD患者的大脑,极大地抑制βAPP的切割,并强烈抑制细胞外a β水平。在动物实验中,它毫无疑问地成功地减轻了疾病的症状。为什么它在人体临床试验中失败了?这次失败,在ACH的范围内显然是无法解释的,似乎是一个很好的机会来应用夏洛克·福尔摩斯的中心格言:“……当你排除了不可能,剩下的,无论多么不可能,都一定是真相。”在讨论的案例中,在排除了“不可能”因素,包括ACH的因素,并假设阿尔茨海默病确实是由a β的过量产生引起的,这一观点得到了实验数据的有力支持,那么与AD候选药物的人体临床试验结果一致的“然而不可能”是如下的。1. 除了βAPP蛋白水解/分泌过程外,在人类阿尔茨海默病中,Aβ也通过βAPP非依赖性途径产生。该通路仅在AD患者中活跃。它在动物和健康人身上不起作用。2. β - app不依赖的a- β生成途径的输出在神经元内保留,正是这种神经元内的β -淀粉样蛋白导致并维持阿尔茨海默病。这些概念构成了AD新范式理论的核心。有几种机制能够实现上述目标。它们包括:rna依赖性βAPP mRNA扩增,这一过程涉及哺乳动物细胞中特定蛋白质的过量生产;人βAPP基因的内部转录起始;βAPP mRNA内的裂解;βAPP mRNA翻译的内部启动。从概念上讲,在本文的背景下,独立于βAPP产生Aβ的机制的性质并不重要;在每一种情况下,都应采用相同的治疗策略。所有与β app无关的Aβ生成的潜在机制都有几个共同的特征。 (a)在每种情况下,激活特定机制所需的关键成分的表达都是由OMA1-DELE1- HRI信号通路引发的综合应激反应(ISR)诱导的,而OMA1-DELE1- HRI信号通路是由线粒体功能障碍激活的,而线粒体功能障碍是由βAPP衍生的β通过细胞摄取分泌的β而在细胞内积累的超过阈值水平,以及βAPP蛋白水解途径中产生的β -淀粉样蛋白的一部分的保留所触发的。(b)在与βAPP无关的Aβ生成的所有潜在机制中,翻译始于通常编码βAPP的Met671的AUG,并导致C100,即n端含met的C99,随后被γ分泌酶裂解生成Aβ(或Met-Aβ)。(c) C100的n端Met是在翻译后而不是共翻译时被去除的。因此,C100和可能的n端含met的a β稳态群体应该出现在具有激活的β不依赖于app的a β生产途径的人类神经元细胞中;它们的检测将为该途径的运作提供无可辩驳的证据。(d)每种潜在机制的Aβ(或Met-Aβ)输出在神经内保留。(e)一旦被激活,每一种潜在的不依赖于β app的机制都会通过产生神经元内保留的Aβ来维持线粒体功能障碍,并支持OMA1-DELE1-HRI信号通路的活性,而OMA1-DELE1-HRI信号通路反过来又会通过ISR的激发,促进β app不依赖于Aβ产生通路的运作。这些自我延续的{β app不依赖于细胞内保留的Aβ}/{线粒体功能障碍}相互反馈循环构成了驱动阿尔茨海默病的“引擎”。神经元内β app衍生的a β的终身积累达到临界水平,足以触发线粒体功能障碍,在使汽车发动机以自我可持续的方式运动中起着起动马达的作用。只有当AD“引擎”被激活时,疾病才会开始。因此,在新范式中,阿尔茨海默病是一种“快速”的疾病,可以在症状阶段进行治疗和治愈。本文提出了概念新颖的研究和治疗策略,并建议BACE激活(是的,激活!)可能是阿尔茨海默病治疗的有效方法。
{"title":"Alzheimer’s Disease is Driven by Beta-Amyloid Generated in the Amyloid Precursor Protein-Independent Pathway and Retained Intraneuronally: Research and Therapeutic Strategies in a New AD Paradigm","authors":"V. Volloch, Sophia Rits-Volloch","doi":"10.33597/aimm.-v2-id1010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33597/aimm.-v2-id1010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present article describes a New Paradigm of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the Old Paradigm, formalized in the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH) theory of AD, beta amyloid (Aβ) is produced, both in health and disease, solely in the amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) proteolytic/secretory pathway. Two βAPP cleavages are involved. First cleavage, by beta-secretase (Beta-site APP Cleaving Enzyme, BACE) between Met671 and Asp672 (numbering according to the βAPP770 isoform), generates the C-terminal fragment of βAPP (C99, reflecting the number of its amino acid residues) and forms the N-terminus of Aβ. Subsequent second cleavage of C99 by gamma-secretase (gamma-site βAPP cleaving enzyme) forms the C-terminus of Aβ, completes its production, and coincides with its secretion. The overproduction of Aβ results in its extracellular accumulation commencing early in life. This triggers a cascade of molecular and cellular events, including formation of neurofibrillary tangles, which results in neurodegeneration. When the extent of neurodegeneration reaches critical levels, symptoms of the disease are manifested. In this Paradigm, Alzheimer’s disorder is a quintessential “slow” disease. The ACH clearly defined therapeutic targets, which included key events of βAPP proteolysis as well as secreted extracellular Aβ. Eventually, a number of candidate AD drugs, highly effective in animal model systems, was developed. Of those, especially successful were inhibitors of beta-sectretase that not only prevented the emergence of AD symptoms, but also reversed them when administered after symptomatic manifestation of the disease in animal models. At this point, there was every reason to hope that a solution to the Alzheimer’s problem is at hand; this, however proved not to be the case. Both the Old and the New Paradigms share the common point of departure, namely that the overproduction of beta-amyloid is the causative basis of AD. The rest of the notions of the New Paradigm are distinctly different from those of the Old one. Formulation of the New Paradigm theory of Alzheimer’s disease was necessitated by the analysis of results of massive human clinical trials of candidate AD drugs that performed outstandingly in animal studies. They all failed in human trials as spectacularly as they succeeded in animal studies. Or did they? Whereas they indeed showed no efficacy whatsoever, they performed perfectly within confines of their design and purpose. For example, a BACE inhibitor verubecestat penetrated the brain of AD patients, greatly inhibited βAPP cleavage, and strongly suppressed extracellular levels of Aβ. It did all this with the same efficiency it exhibited in animal studies, where it indisputably succeeded in mitigating symptoms of the disease. Why did it fail to do so in human clinical trials? This failure, apparently inexplicable within the confines of the ACH, seems as good an occasion as any to apply the central dictum of Sherlock Holmes: “... when you el","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41718770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Protein-Encoding RNA-to-RNA Information Transfer in Mammalian Cells: Principles of RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification. 哺乳动物细胞中编码RNA到RNA信息传递的蛋白质:RNA依赖性mRNA扩增的原理。
Pub Date : 2019-02-19 DOI: 10.20944/PREPRINTS201902.0172.V3
V. Volloch
The transfer of protein-encoding genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein, a process formalized as the "Central Dogma of Molecular Biology", has undergone a significant evolution since its inception. It was amended to account for the information flow from RNA to DNA, the reverse transcription, and for the information transfer from RNA to RNA, the RNA-dependent RNA synthesis. These processes, both potentially leading to protein production, were initially described only in viral systems, and although RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity was shown to be present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis found to occur, in mammalian cells, its function was presumed to be restricted to regulatory. However, recent results, obtained with multiple mRNA species in several mammalian systems, strongly indicate the occurrence of protein-encoding RNA to RNA information transfer in mammalian cells. It can result in the rapid production of the extraordinary quantities of specific proteins as was seen in cases of terminal cellular differentiation and during cellular deposition of extracellular matrix molecules. A malfunction of this process may be involved in pathologies associated either with the deficiency of a protein normally produced by this mechanism or with the abnormal abundance of a protein or of its C-terminal fragment. It seems to be responsible for some types of familial thalassemia and may underlie the overproduction of beta amyloid in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present article is to systematize the current knowledge and understanding of this pathway. The outlined framework introduces unexpected features of the mRNA amplification such as its ability to generate polypeptides non-contiguously encoded in the genome, its second Tier, a physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR, a "Two-Tier Paradox" and RNA "Dark Matter". RNA-dependent mRNA amplification represents a new mode of genomic protein-encoding information transfer in mammalian cells. Its potential physiological impact is substantial, it appears relevant to multiple pathologies and its understanding opens new venues of therapeutic interference, it suggests powerful novel bioengineering approaches and its further rigorous investigations are highly warranted.
编码蛋白质的遗传信息从DNA到RNA再到蛋白质的转移,这一过程被形式化为“分子生物学的中心法则”,自成立以来已经经历了重大的演变。它被修正,以解释从RNA到DNA的信息流,逆转录,以及从RNA到RNA的信息传递,RNA依赖的RNA合成。这些过程,都可能导致蛋白质的产生,最初只在病毒系统中被描述,尽管在哺乳动物细胞中显示存在RNA依赖的RNA聚合酶活性,并且发现发生RNA依赖的RNA合成,但其功能被认为仅限于调节。然而,最近在几种哺乳动物系统中获得的多个mRNA物种的研究结果强烈表明,哺乳动物细胞中存在蛋白质编码RNA到RNA的信息传递。在细胞终末分化和细胞外基质分子的细胞沉积过程中,它可以导致大量特定蛋白质的快速产生。该过程的功能障碍可能涉及与该机制正常产生的蛋白质缺乏或与蛋白质或其c端片段异常丰度相关的病理。它似乎是某些类型的家族性地中海贫血的原因,也可能是散发性阿尔茨海默病中β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生的原因。本文的目的是将目前对这一途径的知识和理解系统化。概述的框架介绍了mRNA扩增的意想不到的特征,例如其在基因组中产生非连续编码多肽的能力,其第二层,生理上发生的细胞内聚合酶链反应,iPCR,“双层悖论”和RNA“暗物质”。rna依赖性mRNA扩增是哺乳动物细胞中基因组蛋白编码信息传递的一种新模式。它潜在的生理影响是巨大的,似乎与多种病理有关,它的理解开辟了治疗干预的新领域,它提出了强大的新型生物工程方法,其进一步严格的研究是高度必要的。
{"title":"Protein-Encoding RNA-to-RNA Information Transfer in Mammalian Cells: Principles of RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification.","authors":"V. Volloch","doi":"10.20944/PREPRINTS201902.0172.V3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20944/PREPRINTS201902.0172.V3","url":null,"abstract":"The transfer of protein-encoding genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein, a process formalized as the \"Central Dogma of Molecular Biology\", has undergone a significant evolution since its inception. It was amended to account for the information flow from RNA to DNA, the reverse transcription, and for the information transfer from RNA to RNA, the RNA-dependent RNA synthesis. These processes, both potentially leading to protein production, were initially described only in viral systems, and although RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity was shown to be present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis found to occur, in mammalian cells, its function was presumed to be restricted to regulatory. However, recent results, obtained with multiple mRNA species in several mammalian systems, strongly indicate the occurrence of protein-encoding RNA to RNA information transfer in mammalian cells. It can result in the rapid production of the extraordinary quantities of specific proteins as was seen in cases of terminal cellular differentiation and during cellular deposition of extracellular matrix molecules. A malfunction of this process may be involved in pathologies associated either with the deficiency of a protein normally produced by this mechanism or with the abnormal abundance of a protein or of its C-terminal fragment. It seems to be responsible for some types of familial thalassemia and may underlie the overproduction of beta amyloid in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present article is to systematize the current knowledge and understanding of this pathway. The outlined framework introduces unexpected features of the mRNA amplification such as its ability to generate polypeptides non-contiguously encoded in the genome, its second Tier, a physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR, a \"Two-Tier Paradox\" and RNA \"Dark Matter\". RNA-dependent mRNA amplification represents a new mode of genomic protein-encoding information transfer in mammalian cells. Its potential physiological impact is substantial, it appears relevant to multiple pathologies and its understanding opens new venues of therapeutic interference, it suggests powerful novel bioengineering approaches and its further rigorous investigations are highly warranted.","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"1 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43766277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Precursor-Independent Overproduction of Beta-Amyloid in AD: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as Possible Initiator of Asymmetric RNA-Dependent βAPP mRNA Amplification. An Engine that Drives Alzheimer's Disease. AD中不依赖前体的β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生:线粒体功能障碍可能引发不对称rna依赖的β - app mRNA扩增。驱动阿尔茨海默病的引擎
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.01-1005
V. Volloch, B. Olsen, S. Rits
The present study defines RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA as a molecular basis of beta-amyloid overproduction in Alzheimer's disease. In this process, βAPP mRNA serves as a template for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp complex. The resulting antisense RNA self-primes its extension utilizing two complementary elements: 3'-terminal and internal, located within an antisense segment corresponding to the coding portion of βAPP mRNA. The extension produces 3'-terminal fragment of βAPP mRNA, a part of a hairpin-structured antisense/sense RNA molecule. Cleavage at the 3' end of the hairpin loop produces RNA end product encoding a C-terminal fragment of βAPP. Since each conventional βAPP mRNA can be used repeatedly as a template, the process constitutes an asymmetric mRNA amplification. The 5'-most translation initiation codon of the amplified mRNA is the AUG preceding immediately and in-frame the Aβ-coding segment. Translation from this codon overproduces Aβ independently of βAPP. Such process can occur in humans but not in mice and other animals where segments of βAPP antisense RNA required for self-priming have little, if any, complementarity. This explains why Alzheimer's disease occurs exclusively in humans and implies that βAPP mRNA amplification is requisite in AD. In AD, therefore, there are two pathways of beta-amyloid production: βAPP proteolytic pathway and βAPP mRNA amplification pathway independent of βAPP and insensitive to beta-secretase inhibition. This implies that in healthy humans, where only the proteolytic pathway is in operation, Aβ production should be suppressed by the BACE inhibition, and indeed it is. However, since βAPP-independent pathway operating in AD is by far the predominant one, BACE inhibition has no effect in Alzheimer's disease. It appears that, physiologically, the extent of beta-amyloid overproduction sufficient to trigger amyloid cascade culminating in AD requires asymmetric RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA and cannot be reached without it. In turn, the occurrence of mRNA amplification process depends on the activation of inducible components of RdRp complex by certain stresses, for example the ER stress in case of amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins. In case of Alzheimer's disease, such an induction appears to be triggered by stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, a phenomenon closely linked to AD. The cause-and-effect relationships between mitochondrial dysfunction and AD appear to be very different in familial, FAD, and sporadic, SAD cases. In FAD, increased levels or more toxic species of Aβ resulting from the abnormal proteolysis of βAPP trigger mitochondrial dysfunction, activate mRNA amplification and increase the production of Aβ, reinforcing the cycle. Thus in FAD, mitochondrial dysfunction is an intrinsic component of the amyloid cascade. The reverse sequence is true in SAD where aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction activates amplification of βAPP
本研究将βAPP mRNA的rna依赖性扩增定义为阿尔茨海默病中β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生的分子基础。在这个过程中,βAPP mRNA作为RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶RdRp复合物的模板。由此产生的反义RNA利用两个互补元件自引其延伸:3'端和内部,位于与βAPP mRNA编码部分对应的反义片段内。延伸产生βAPP mRNA的3'端片段,这是发夹结构反义/正RNA分子的一部分。在发夹环的3'端切割产生编码βAPP c端片段的RNA终产物。由于每个传统的βAPP mRNA都可以重复用作模板,因此该过程构成了不对称的mRNA扩增。扩增mRNA的5'端翻译起始密码子是紧邻a β编码段的AUG,并在框架内。该密码子的翻译独立于βAPP过量产生Aβ。这种过程可以发生在人类身上,但不会发生在小鼠和其他动物身上,因为自引所需的βAPP反义RNA片段几乎没有互补性。这解释了为什么阿尔茨海默病只发生在人类身上,并暗示βAPP mRNA扩增在阿尔茨海默病中是必要的。因此,在AD中,β -淀粉样蛋白的产生有两种途径:βAPP蛋白水解途径和βAPP mRNA扩增途径,它们独立于βAPP,对β分泌酶抑制不敏感。这表明,在只有蛋白水解途径起作用的健康人群中,BACE抑制作用应该会抑制Aβ的产生,事实也确实如此。然而,由于β app非依赖性通路在AD中起主导作用,BACE抑制在阿尔茨海默病中没有作用。从生理学角度来看,β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生的程度足以触发淀粉样蛋白级联,最终导致AD,这需要βAPP mRNA的非对称rna依赖扩增,没有它就无法达到。反过来,mRNA扩增过程的发生依赖于RdRp复合物的诱导组分在某些胁迫下的激活,例如编码细胞外基质蛋白的mRNA扩增时的内质网胁迫。在阿尔茨海默病的情况下,这种诱导似乎是由与线粒体功能障碍相关的压力触发的,这种现象与AD密切相关。线粒体功能障碍与AD之间的因果关系在家族性、FAD和散发性SAD病例中似乎非常不同。在FAD中,βAPP蛋白水解异常导致的Aβ水平升高或毒性物质增多会触发线粒体功能障碍,激活mRNA扩增并增加Aβ的产生,从而加强循环。因此,在FAD中,线粒体功能障碍是淀粉样蛋白级联的内在组成部分。在SAD中,与衰老相关的线粒体功能障碍激活βAPP mRNA的扩增,并增强Aβ的产生。这会导致进一步的线粒体功能障碍,循环重复,退化加剧。因此,在SAD中,最初的线粒体功能障碍在疾病之前出现,独立于Aβ产生的增加,并在上游出现,即在SAD中,线粒体病理在层次上取代了Aβ病理。这是提出线粒体级联假说的主要原因。但就MCH而言,该疾病的核心是淀粉样蛋白级联在淀粉样蛋白级联假说中定义,ACH。与该核心相关的线粒体功能障碍在SAD中起致病作用,在FAD中起辅助作用。在FAD中,Aβ产生的初始增加是基于突变的,发生在生命的相对早期,而在SAD中,它是由衰老因素强制的,但两者都会导致机制相同的自我延续的相互Aβ/线粒体功能障碍反馈循环,这是一个引擎,通过rna依赖性βAPP mRNA扩增,驱动β -淀粉样蛋白的过度产生,从而导致AD;因此,家族性和散发形式的阿尔茨海默病在发病年龄上存在巨大差异,但在进展中存在深刻的病理和症状相似性。有趣的是,最近的研究发现,线粒体微蛋白PIGBOS与内质网相互作用,减轻了未折叠蛋白的反应,这表明线粒体功能障碍与内质网应激之间可能存在联系,涉及rna依赖性mRNA扩增途径的激活。线粒体功能障碍可能参与βAPP mRNA扩增,使其成为一个有希望的治疗靶点。在这方面,最近使用抗糖尿病药物二甲双胍减轻甚至逆转a β诱导的代谢缺陷的成功令人鼓舞。
{"title":"Precursor-Independent Overproduction of Beta-Amyloid in AD: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as Possible Initiator of Asymmetric RNA-Dependent βAPP mRNA Amplification. An Engine that Drives Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"V. Volloch, B. Olsen, S. Rits","doi":"10.33597/aimm.01-1005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33597/aimm.01-1005","url":null,"abstract":"The present study defines RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA as a molecular basis of beta-amyloid overproduction in Alzheimer's disease. In this process, βAPP mRNA serves as a template for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp complex. The resulting antisense RNA self-primes its extension utilizing two complementary elements: 3'-terminal and internal, located within an antisense segment corresponding to the coding portion of βAPP mRNA. The extension produces 3'-terminal fragment of βAPP mRNA, a part of a hairpin-structured antisense/sense RNA molecule. Cleavage at the 3' end of the hairpin loop produces RNA end product encoding a C-terminal fragment of βAPP. Since each conventional βAPP mRNA can be used repeatedly as a template, the process constitutes an asymmetric mRNA amplification. The 5'-most translation initiation codon of the amplified mRNA is the AUG preceding immediately and in-frame the Aβ-coding segment. Translation from this codon overproduces Aβ independently of βAPP. Such process can occur in humans but not in mice and other animals where segments of βAPP antisense RNA required for self-priming have little, if any, complementarity. This explains why Alzheimer's disease occurs exclusively in humans and implies that βAPP mRNA amplification is requisite in AD. In AD, therefore, there are two pathways of beta-amyloid production: βAPP proteolytic pathway and βAPP mRNA amplification pathway independent of βAPP and insensitive to beta-secretase inhibition. This implies that in healthy humans, where only the proteolytic pathway is in operation, Aβ production should be suppressed by the BACE inhibition, and indeed it is. However, since βAPP-independent pathway operating in AD is by far the predominant one, BACE inhibition has no effect in Alzheimer's disease. It appears that, physiologically, the extent of beta-amyloid overproduction sufficient to trigger amyloid cascade culminating in AD requires asymmetric RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA and cannot be reached without it. In turn, the occurrence of mRNA amplification process depends on the activation of inducible components of RdRp complex by certain stresses, for example the ER stress in case of amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins. In case of Alzheimer's disease, such an induction appears to be triggered by stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, a phenomenon closely linked to AD. The cause-and-effect relationships between mitochondrial dysfunction and AD appear to be very different in familial, FAD, and sporadic, SAD cases. In FAD, increased levels or more toxic species of Aβ resulting from the abnormal proteolysis of βAPP trigger mitochondrial dysfunction, activate mRNA amplification and increase the production of Aβ, reinforcing the cycle. Thus in FAD, mitochondrial dysfunction is an intrinsic component of the amyloid cascade. The reverse sequence is true in SAD where aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction activates amplification of βAPP","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"1 1 1","pages":"61-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69456208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Protein-Encoding RNA-to-RNA Information Transfer in Mammalian Cells: Principles of RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification. 哺乳动物细胞中编码RNA到RNA信息传递的蛋白质:RNA依赖性mRNA扩增的原理。
Vladimir Volloch

The transfer of protein-encoding genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein, a process formalized as the "Central Dogma of Molecular Biology", has undergone a significant evolution since its inception. It was amended to account for the information flow from RNA to DNA, the reverse transcription, and for the information transfer from RNA to RNA, the RNA-dependent RNA synthesis. These processes, both potentially leading to protein production, were initially described only in viral systems, and although RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity was shown to be present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis found to occur, in mammalian cells, its function was presumed to be restricted to regulatory. However, recent results, obtained with multiple mRNA species in several mammalian systems, strongly indicate the occurrence of protein-encoding RNA to RNA information transfer in mammalian cells. It can result in the rapid production of the extraordinary quantities of specific proteins as was seen in cases of terminal cellular differentiation and during cellular deposition of extracellular matrix molecules. A malfunction of this process may be involved in pathologies associated either with the deficiency of a protein normally produced by this mechanism or with the abnormal abundance of a protein or of its C-terminal fragment. It seems to be responsible for some types of familial thalassemia and may underlie the overproduction of beta amyloid in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present article is to systematize the current knowledge and understanding of this pathway. The outlined framework introduces unexpected features of the mRNA amplification such as its ability to generate polypeptides non-contiguously encoded in the genome, its second Tier, a physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR, a "Two-Tier Paradox" and RNA "Dark Matter". RNA-dependent mRNA amplification represents a new mode of genomic protein-encoding information transfer in mammalian cells. Its potential physiological impact is substantial, it appears relevant to multiple pathologies and its understanding opens new venues of therapeutic interference, it suggests powerful novel bioengineering approaches and its further rigorous investigations are highly warranted.

编码遗传信息的蛋白质从DNA到RNA再到蛋白质的转移,这一过程被正式称为“分子生物学的中心法则”,自成立以来经历了重大的进化。对其进行了修改,以说明从RNA到DNA的信息流、逆转录以及从RNA到RNA的信息传递,即RNA依赖性RNA合成。这些可能导致蛋白质产生的过程最初仅在病毒系统中被描述,尽管在哺乳动物细胞中存在RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶活性,并发现RNA依赖性核糖核酸合成,但其功能被认为仅限于调节。然而,最近在几种哺乳动物系统中用多种信使核糖核酸获得的结果强烈表明,在哺乳动物细胞中发生了编码蛋白质的核糖核酸到核糖核酸的信息转移。它可以导致快速产生大量的特异性蛋白质,这在细胞终末分化和细胞外基质分子的细胞沉积过程中可以看到。该过程的故障可能涉及与该机制正常产生的蛋白质缺乏或蛋白质或其C末端片段的异常丰度相关的病理学。它似乎是某些类型的家族性地中海贫血的原因,并可能是散发性阿尔茨海默病中β淀粉样蛋白过度产生的原因。本文的目的是系统化目前对这一途径的认识和理解。概述的框架介绍了信使核糖核酸扩增的意外特征,如其产生基因组中非连续编码的多肽的能力、第二层、生理上发生的细胞内聚合酶链式反应、iPCR、“二层悖论”和RNA“暗物质”。RNA依赖性信使核糖核酸扩增代表了哺乳动物细胞中编码信息传递的基因组蛋白质的一种新模式。它的潜在生理影响是巨大的,它似乎与多种病理有关,它的理解为治疗干预开辟了新的场所,它提出了强大的新生物工程方法,它的进一步严格研究是非常有必要的。
{"title":"Protein-Encoding RNA-to-RNA Information Transfer in Mammalian Cells: Principles of RNA-Dependent mRNA Amplification.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transfer of protein-encoding genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein, a process formalized as the \"Central Dogma of Molecular Biology\", has undergone a significant evolution since its inception. It was amended to account for the information flow from RNA to DNA, the reverse transcription, and for the information transfer from RNA to RNA, the RNA-dependent RNA synthesis. These processes, both potentially leading to protein production, were initially described only in viral systems, and although RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity was shown to be present, and RNA-dependent RNA synthesis found to occur, in mammalian cells, its function was presumed to be restricted to regulatory. However, recent results, obtained with multiple mRNA species in several mammalian systems, strongly indicate the occurrence of protein-encoding RNA to RNA information transfer in mammalian cells. It can result in the rapid production of the extraordinary quantities of specific proteins as was seen in cases of terminal cellular differentiation and during cellular deposition of extracellular matrix molecules. A malfunction of this process may be involved in pathologies associated either with the deficiency of a protein normally produced by this mechanism or with the abnormal abundance of a protein or of its C-terminal fragment. It seems to be responsible for some types of familial thalassemia and may underlie the overproduction of beta amyloid in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present article is to systematize the current knowledge and understanding of this pathway. The outlined framework introduces unexpected features of the mRNA amplification such as its ability to generate polypeptides non-contiguously encoded in the genome, its second Tier, a physiologically occurring intracellular polymerase chain reaction, iPCR, a \"Two-Tier Paradox\" and RNA \"Dark Matter\". RNA-dependent mRNA amplification represents a new mode of genomic protein-encoding information transfer in mammalian cells. Its potential physiological impact is substantial, it appears relevant to multiple pathologies and its understanding opens new venues of therapeutic interference, it suggests powerful novel bioengineering approaches and its further rigorous investigations are highly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750253/pdf/nihms-1040496.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41223273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Precursor-Independent Overproduction of Beta-Amyloid in AD: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as Possible Initiator of Asymmetric RNA-Dependent βAPP mRNA Amplification. An Engine that Drives Alzheimer's Disease. AD中不依赖前体的β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生:线粒体功能障碍可能引发不对称rna依赖的β - app mRNA扩增。驱动阿尔茨海默病的引擎
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-20
Vladimir Volloch, Bjorn R Olsen, Sophia Rits

The present study defines RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA as a molecular basis of beta-amyloid overproduction in Alzheimer's disease. In this process, βAPP mRNA serves as a template for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp complex. The resulting antisense RNA self-primes its extension utilizing two complementary elements: 3'-terminal and internal, located within an antisense segment corresponding to the coding portion of βAPP mRNA. The extension produces 3'-terminal fragment of βAPP mRNA, a part of a hairpin-structured antisense/sense RNA molecule. Cleavage at the 3' end of the hairpin loop produces RNA end product encoding a C-terminal fragment of βAPP. Since each conventional βAPP mRNA can be used repeatedly as a template, the process constitutes an asymmetric mRNA amplification. The 5'-most translation initiation codon of the amplified mRNA is the AUG preceding immediately and in-frame the Aβ-coding segment. Translation from this codon overproduces Aβ independently of βAPP. Such process can occur in humans but not in mice and other animals where segments of βAPP antisense RNA required for self-priming have little, if any, complementarity. This explains why Alzheimer's disease occurs exclusively in humans and implies that βAPP mRNA amplification is requisite in AD. In AD, therefore, there are two pathways of beta-amyloid production: βAPP proteolytic pathway and βAPP mRNA amplification pathway independent of βAPP and insensitive to beta-secretase inhibition. This implies that in healthy humans, where only the proteolytic pathway is in operation, Aβ production should be suppressed by the BACE inhibition, and indeed it is. However, since βAPP-independent pathway operating in AD is by far the predominant one, BACE inhibition has no effect in Alzheimer's disease. It appears that, physiologically, the extent of beta-amyloid overproduction sufficient to trigger amyloid cascade culminating in AD requires asymmetric RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA and cannot be reached without it. In turn, the occurrence of mRNA amplification process depends on the activation of inducible components of RdRp complex by certain stresses, for example the ER stress in case of amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins. In case of Alzheimer's disease, such an induction appears to be triggered by stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, a phenomenon closely linked to AD. The cause-and-effect relationships between mitochondrial dysfunction and AD appear to be very different in familial, FAD, and sporadic, SAD cases. In FAD, increased levels or more toxic species of Aβ resulting from the abnormal proteolysis of βAPP trigger mitochondrial dysfunction, activate mRNA amplification and increase the production of Aβ, reinforcing the cycle. Thus in FAD, mitochondrial dysfunction is an intrinsic component of the amyloid cascade. The reverse sequence is true in SAD where aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction activates amplification o

本研究将βAPP mRNA的rna依赖性扩增定义为阿尔茨海默病中β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生的分子基础。在这个过程中,βAPP mRNA作为RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶RdRp复合物的模板。由此产生的反义RNA利用两个互补元件自引其延伸:3'端和内部,位于与βAPP mRNA编码部分对应的反义片段内。延伸产生βAPP mRNA的3'端片段,这是发夹结构反义/正RNA分子的一部分。在发夹环的3'端切割产生编码βAPP c端片段的RNA终产物。由于每个传统的βAPP mRNA都可以重复用作模板,因此该过程构成了不对称的mRNA扩增。扩增mRNA的5'端翻译起始密码子是紧邻a β编码段的AUG,并在框架内。该密码子的翻译独立于βAPP过量产生Aβ。这种过程可以发生在人类身上,但不会发生在小鼠和其他动物身上,因为自引所需的βAPP反义RNA片段几乎没有互补性。这解释了为什么阿尔茨海默病只发生在人类身上,并暗示βAPP mRNA扩增在阿尔茨海默病中是必要的。因此,在AD中,β -淀粉样蛋白的产生有两种途径:βAPP蛋白水解途径和βAPP mRNA扩增途径,它们独立于βAPP,对β分泌酶抑制不敏感。这表明,在只有蛋白水解途径起作用的健康人群中,BACE抑制作用应该会抑制Aβ的产生,事实也确实如此。然而,由于β app非依赖性通路在AD中起主导作用,BACE抑制在阿尔茨海默病中没有作用。从生理学角度来看,β -淀粉样蛋白过量产生的程度足以触发淀粉样蛋白级联,最终导致AD,这需要βAPP mRNA的非对称rna依赖扩增,没有它就无法达到。反过来,mRNA扩增过程的发生依赖于RdRp复合物的诱导组分在某些胁迫下的激活,例如编码细胞外基质蛋白的mRNA扩增时的内质网胁迫。在阿尔茨海默病的情况下,这种诱导似乎是由与线粒体功能障碍相关的压力触发的,这种现象与AD密切相关。线粒体功能障碍与AD之间的因果关系在家族性、FAD和散发性SAD病例中似乎非常不同。在FAD中,βAPP蛋白水解异常导致的Aβ水平升高或毒性物质增多会触发线粒体功能障碍,激活mRNA扩增并增加Aβ的产生,从而加强循环。因此,在FAD中,线粒体功能障碍是淀粉样蛋白级联的内在组成部分。在SAD中,与衰老相关的线粒体功能障碍激活βAPP mRNA的扩增,并增强Aβ的产生。这会导致进一步的线粒体功能障碍,循环重复,退化加剧。因此,在SAD中,最初的线粒体功能障碍在疾病之前出现,独立于Aβ产生的增加,并在上游出现,即在SAD中,线粒体病理在层次上取代了Aβ病理。这是提出线粒体级联假说的主要原因。但就MCH而言,该疾病的核心是淀粉样蛋白级联在淀粉样蛋白级联假说中定义,ACH。与该核心相关的线粒体功能障碍在SAD中起致病作用,在FAD中起辅助作用。在FAD中,Aβ产生的初始增加是基于突变的,发生在生命的相对早期,而在SAD中,它是由衰老因素强制的,但两者都会导致机制相同的自我延续的相互Aβ/线粒体功能障碍反馈循环,这是一个引擎,通过rna依赖性βAPP mRNA扩增,驱动β -淀粉样蛋白的过度产生,从而导致AD;因此,家族性和散发形式的阿尔茨海默病在发病年龄上存在巨大差异,但在进展中存在深刻的病理和症状相似性。有趣的是,最近的研究发现,线粒体微蛋白PIGBOS与内质网相互作用,减轻了未折叠蛋白的反应,这表明线粒体功能障碍与内质网应激之间可能存在联系,涉及rna依赖性mRNA扩增途径的激活。线粒体功能障碍可能参与βAPP mRNA扩增,使其成为一个有希望的治疗靶点。在这方面,最近使用抗糖尿病药物二甲双胍减轻甚至逆转a β诱导的代谢缺陷的成功令人鼓舞。
{"title":"Precursor-Independent Overproduction of Beta-Amyloid in AD: Mitochondrial Dysfunction as Possible Initiator of Asymmetric RNA-Dependent βAPP mRNA Amplification. An Engine that Drives Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Vladimir Volloch,&nbsp;Bjorn R Olsen,&nbsp;Sophia Rits","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study defines RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA as a molecular basis of beta-amyloid overproduction in Alzheimer's disease. In this process, βAPP mRNA serves as a template for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp complex. The resulting antisense RNA self-primes its extension utilizing two complementary elements: 3'-terminal and internal, located within an antisense segment corresponding to the coding portion of βAPP mRNA. The extension produces 3'-terminal fragment of βAPP mRNA, a part of a hairpin-structured antisense/sense RNA molecule. Cleavage at the 3' end of the hairpin loop produces RNA end product encoding a C-terminal fragment of βAPP. Since each conventional βAPP mRNA can be used repeatedly as a template, the process constitutes an asymmetric mRNA amplification. The 5'-most translation initiation codon of the amplified mRNA is the AUG preceding immediately and in-frame the Aβ-coding segment. Translation from this codon overproduces Aβ independently of βAPP. Such process can occur in humans but not in mice and other animals where segments of βAPP antisense RNA required for self-priming have little, if any, complementarity. This explains why Alzheimer's disease occurs exclusively in humans and implies that βAPP mRNA amplification is requisite in AD. In AD, therefore, there are two pathways of beta-amyloid production: βAPP proteolytic pathway and βAPP mRNA amplification pathway independent of βAPP and insensitive to beta-secretase inhibition. This implies that in healthy humans, where only the proteolytic pathway is in operation, Aβ production should be suppressed by the BACE inhibition, and indeed it is. However, since βAPP-independent pathway operating in AD is by far the predominant one, BACE inhibition has no effect in Alzheimer's disease. It appears that, physiologically, the extent of beta-amyloid overproduction sufficient to trigger amyloid cascade culminating in AD requires asymmetric RNA-dependent amplification of βAPP mRNA and cannot be reached without it. In turn, the occurrence of mRNA amplification process depends on the activation of inducible components of RdRp complex by certain stresses, for example the ER stress in case of amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins. In case of Alzheimer's disease, such an induction appears to be triggered by stresses associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, a phenomenon closely linked to AD. The cause-and-effect relationships between mitochondrial dysfunction and AD appear to be very different in familial, FAD, and sporadic, SAD cases. In FAD, increased levels or more toxic species of Aβ resulting from the abnormal proteolysis of βAPP trigger mitochondrial dysfunction, activate mRNA amplification and increase the production of Aβ, reinforcing the cycle. Thus in FAD, mitochondrial dysfunction is an intrinsic component of the amyloid cascade. The reverse sequence is true in SAD where aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction activates amplification o","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"61-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922309/pdf/nihms-1062464.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37474922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RNA-dependent Amplification of Mammalian mRNA Encoding Extracellullar Matrix Proteins: Identification of Chimeric RNA Intermediates for α1, β1, and γ1 Chains of Laminin. 哺乳动物细胞外基质蛋白mRNA的RNA依赖性扩增:层粘连蛋白α1、β1和γ1链嵌合RNA中间体的鉴定
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.33597/aimm.01-1004
V. Volloch, S. Rits, B. Olsen
De novo production of RNA on RNA template, a process known as RNA-dependent RNA synthesis, RdRs, and the enzymatic activity conducting it, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp, were initially considered to be exclusively virus-specific. Eventually, however, the occurrence of RdRs and the ubiquitous presence of conventional RdRp were demonstrated in numerous eukaryotic organisms. The evidence that the enzymatic machinery capable of RdRs is present in mammalian cells was derived from studies of viruses, such as hepatitis delta virus, HDV, that do not encode RdRp yet undergo a robust RNA replication once inside the mammalian host; thus firmly establishing its occurrence and functionality. Moreover, it became clear that RdRp activity, apparently in a non-conventional form, is constitutively present in most, if not in all, mammalian cells. Because such activity was shown to produce short transcripts, given its apparent involvement in RNA interference phenomena, and because double-stranded RNA is known to trigger cellular responses leading to its degradation, it was generally assumed that its role in mammalian cells is restricted to a regulatory function. However, at the same time, an enzymatic activity capable of generating complete antisense RNA complements of mRNAs was discovered in mammalian cells undergoing terminal differentiation. Moreover, observations of widespread synthesis of antisense RNAs initiating at the 3'poly(A) of mRNAs in human cells suggested an extensive cellular utilization of mammalian RdRp. These results led to the development of a model of RdRp-facilitated and antisense RNA-mediated amplification of mammalian mRNA. Recent detection of the major model-predicted identifiers, chimeric RNA intermediates containing both sense and antisense RNA strands covalently joined in a rigorously predicted and uniquely defined manner, as well as the identification of a putative chimeric RNA end product of this process, validated the proposed model. The results corroborating mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification were obtained in vivo with cells undergoing terminal erythroid differentiation and programmed for only a short survival span. This raises a question of whether mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification is a specialized occurrence limited to extreme circumstances of terminal differentiation or a general physiological phenomenon. The present study addresses this question by testing for the occurrence of RNA-dependent amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins abundantly produced throughout the tissue and organ development and homeostasis, an exceptionally revealing indicator of the range and scope of this phenomenon. We report here the detection of major identifiers of RNA-dependent amplification of mRNA encoding α1, β1, and γ1 chains of laminin in mouse tissues producing large quantities of extracellular matrix proteins. The results obtained warrant reinterpretation of the mechanisms involved in ubiquitous and abunda
在RNA模板上从头生产RNA的过程称为RNA依赖性RNA合成(RdRs),以及进行该过程的酶活性RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶(RdRp)最初被认为是病毒特异性的。然而,最终在许多真核生物中证实了rdr的发生和常规RdRp的普遍存在。能够产生rdr的酶机制存在于哺乳动物细胞中的证据来自对病毒(如丁型肝炎病毒,HDV)的研究,这些病毒不编码RdRp,但一旦进入哺乳动物宿主,就会进行强大的RNA复制;从而牢固地确立了它的发生和功能。此外,很明显,RdRp活性以一种非常规的形式存在于大多数(如果不是全部的话)哺乳动物细胞中。由于这种活性被证明产生短转录本,鉴于其明显参与RNA干扰现象,并且由于双链RNA已知会触发导致其降解的细胞反应,因此通常认为其在哺乳动物细胞中的作用仅限于调节功能。然而,与此同时,在处于终末分化的哺乳动物细胞中发现了一种能够产生mrna的完全反义RNA补体的酶活性。此外,在人类细胞中观察到广泛的反义rna合成,从mrna的3'poly(A)开始,这表明哺乳动物RdRp在细胞中被广泛利用。这些结果导致了rdrp促进和反义rna介导的哺乳动物mRNA扩增模型的建立。最近对主要模型预测标识符的检测,包括以严格预测和独特定义的方式共价连接的正义和反义RNA链的嵌合RNA中间体,以及该过程中推定的嵌合RNA最终产物的鉴定,验证了所提出的模型。结果证实了哺乳动物rna依赖的mRNA扩增是在体内获得的,细胞处于终末红系分化,并且仅在短时间内存活。这就提出了一个问题:哺乳动物rna依赖性mRNA扩增是一种局限于末端分化极端情况下的特殊现象,还是一种普遍的生理现象?本研究通过检测在整个组织和器官发育和体内平衡中大量产生的编码细胞外基质蛋白的mRNA的rna依赖性扩增的发生来解决这个问题,这是一个特别揭示这种现象的范围和范围的指标。我们在此报告了在产生大量细胞外基质蛋白的小鼠组织中检测到编码层粘连蛋白α1、β1和γ1链的mRNA的rna依赖扩增的主要标识符。本研究结果为重新解释细胞外基质蛋白广泛产生和沉积的机制提供了依据,证实了哺乳动物rna依赖性mRNA扩增是基因组蛋白编码信息传递的新模式,并将其确立为一种普遍的生理现象。
{"title":"RNA-dependent Amplification of Mammalian mRNA Encoding Extracellullar Matrix Proteins: Identification of Chimeric RNA Intermediates for α1, β1, and γ1 Chains of Laminin.","authors":"V. Volloch, S. Rits, B. Olsen","doi":"10.33597/aimm.01-1004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33597/aimm.01-1004","url":null,"abstract":"De novo production of RNA on RNA template, a process known as RNA-dependent RNA synthesis, RdRs, and the enzymatic activity conducting it, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, RdRp, were initially considered to be exclusively virus-specific. Eventually, however, the occurrence of RdRs and the ubiquitous presence of conventional RdRp were demonstrated in numerous eukaryotic organisms. The evidence that the enzymatic machinery capable of RdRs is present in mammalian cells was derived from studies of viruses, such as hepatitis delta virus, HDV, that do not encode RdRp yet undergo a robust RNA replication once inside the mammalian host; thus firmly establishing its occurrence and functionality. Moreover, it became clear that RdRp activity, apparently in a non-conventional form, is constitutively present in most, if not in all, mammalian cells. Because such activity was shown to produce short transcripts, given its apparent involvement in RNA interference phenomena, and because double-stranded RNA is known to trigger cellular responses leading to its degradation, it was generally assumed that its role in mammalian cells is restricted to a regulatory function. However, at the same time, an enzymatic activity capable of generating complete antisense RNA complements of mRNAs was discovered in mammalian cells undergoing terminal differentiation. Moreover, observations of widespread synthesis of antisense RNAs initiating at the 3'poly(A) of mRNAs in human cells suggested an extensive cellular utilization of mammalian RdRp. These results led to the development of a model of RdRp-facilitated and antisense RNA-mediated amplification of mammalian mRNA. Recent detection of the major model-predicted identifiers, chimeric RNA intermediates containing both sense and antisense RNA strands covalently joined in a rigorously predicted and uniquely defined manner, as well as the identification of a putative chimeric RNA end product of this process, validated the proposed model. The results corroborating mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification were obtained in vivo with cells undergoing terminal erythroid differentiation and programmed for only a short survival span. This raises a question of whether mammalian RNA-dependent mRNA amplification is a specialized occurrence limited to extreme circumstances of terminal differentiation or a general physiological phenomenon. The present study addresses this question by testing for the occurrence of RNA-dependent amplification of mRNA encoding extracellular matrix proteins abundantly produced throughout the tissue and organ development and homeostasis, an exceptionally revealing indicator of the range and scope of this phenomenon. We report here the detection of major identifiers of RNA-dependent amplification of mRNA encoding α1, β1, and γ1 chains of laminin in mouse tissues producing large quantities of extracellular matrix proteins. The results obtained warrant reinterpretation of the mechanisms involved in ubiquitous and abunda","PeriodicalId":92750,"journal":{"name":"Annals of integrative molecular medicine","volume":"1 1 1","pages":"48-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69456203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
期刊
Annals of integrative molecular medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1