首页 > 最新文献

Brachytherapy最新文献

英文 中文
PO89 PO89
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.190
Ming Xu
The objective was to evaluate radioactive angles and dose distribution of partially shielded GYN cylinders during HDR Brachytherapy in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Patient treatment plans with partial shielded cylinders were generated in Brachytherapy planning using Eclipse TPS. The AAPM TG-43 dose calculation formalism was commonly used to provide rapid patient treatment. The Acuros algorithm in AAPM TG-186 MBCDAs with the same source position and planned dwell time was used to compare shielding effects and unblocked dose distributions. Acuros calculations employed solid applicators with shielded angles of 90°, 180°, and 270° from the TPS library, with tungsten alloy shielded segments. All calculations were performed in the water phantom. The differences between the AAPM TG-43 and TG-186 algorithms in these applicators were evaluated in terms of shielded angle, radioactive range, low dose bath background, and dose distribution. Patient planning using various shielded angle cylinders anteriorly or posteriorly to minimize local bladder or rectal dose on patient CT images for vaginal cuff treatment. The dwell time at the source position was calculated according to the 3D TG-43 algorithm, ignoring the shielding effect of the applicator to result in a cylindrically symmetrical dose distribution along the cylinder axis. Acuros dose calculation implemented Monte-Carlo (MC) algorithm approach. The 3D asymmetric dose distribution was shown in the sagittal view as expected. Low dose bath in the shielded areas was observed at approximately 10-15% of the prescribed dose. The low dose bath level changed slowly with shielding angle. The physical shielding angle was effectively shielded within the dose distribution range. The radioactive angle can be defined as the angle of the radioactive coverage portion from the source, or the angle between the designed isodose points to the center of cylindrical section. As showed in the figure below, a 180° shielded cylinder can shield a maximum range of about 210° in the posterior portion. When the sum of the shieling angle and radioactive angle was 360°, the radioactive angle was equal to 150°. This behavior was confirmed for shielding angles of 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively in Acuros calculations. The radioactive angle was found to be smaller than the physical shielding angle. The presence of the metal block appeared to prevent deposition of scattered doses to unshielded tissue. This reduced scatter made the blocking angle projection wider than its physical angle. A slightly longer Acuros dwell time at a few percent was required to achieve the same dose level calculated for TG-43. Acuros calculations for shielded cylinder suggest that the shielded region in dose distribution is wider than the physically shielded part of segment. The radioactive angle is smaller than the physical shielded angle. Shielded areas are kept in low dose baths of prescribed doses. A slightly longer dwell time is required t
目的是在商业治疗计划系统(TPS)中评估HDR近距离放射治疗中部分屏蔽GYN圆柱体的放射角度和剂量分布。在近距离放射治疗计划中,使用Eclipse TPS生成部分屏蔽柱体的患者治疗计划。常用AAPM TG-43剂量计算公式为患者提供快速治疗。采用相同源位置和计划停留时间的AAPM TG-186 mbcda的Acuros算法比较屏蔽效果和未阻断剂量分布。Acuros的计算采用了来自TPS库的屏蔽角为90°、180°和270°的固体涂敷器,带有钨合金屏蔽段。所有的计算都是在水模型中进行的。从屏蔽角、辐射范围、低剂量浴本底和剂量分布等方面评价了AAPM TG-43和TG-186算法在这些涂抹器中的差异。患者计划在阴道袖带治疗时,在患者CT图像上使用各种前后屏蔽角圆柱体以减少局部膀胱或直肠剂量。根据3D TG-43算法计算源位置的停留时间,忽略施加器的屏蔽作用,使剂量沿圆柱体轴呈圆柱对称分布。Acuros剂量计算采用蒙特卡罗(Monte-Carlo, MC)算法。矢状面三维不对称剂量分布与预期一致。在屏蔽区域观察到约为规定剂量10-15%的低剂量浴。低剂量浴液水平随屏蔽角变化缓慢。物理屏蔽角在剂量分布范围内被有效屏蔽。放射性角可以定义为放射性覆盖部分与源的夹角,或设计的等剂量点与圆柱形截面中心的夹角。如下图所示,一个180°的屏蔽筒可以在后部最大屏蔽210°左右的范围。当屏蔽角与辐射角之和为360°时,辐射角等于150°。在acros计算中,屏蔽角分别为90°、180°和270°时,这种行为得到了证实。发现放射性角小于物理屏蔽角。金属块的存在似乎可以防止散射剂量沉积到未屏蔽的组织。这种减少的散射使得遮挡角投影比其物理角度更宽。为达到TG-43计算的相同剂量水平,需要稍长的acros停留时间(几个百分点)。对屏蔽圆柱体的acros计算表明,剂量分布中的屏蔽区域比分段的物理屏蔽部分更宽。辐射角小于物理屏蔽角。屏蔽区域保持在规定剂量的低剂量浴中。需要稍长的停留时间才能达到为TG-43计算的相同剂量水平。
{"title":"PO89","authors":"Ming Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.190","url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to evaluate radioactive angles and dose distribution of partially shielded GYN cylinders during HDR Brachytherapy in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Patient treatment plans with partial shielded cylinders were generated in Brachytherapy planning using Eclipse TPS. The AAPM TG-43 dose calculation formalism was commonly used to provide rapid patient treatment. The Acuros algorithm in AAPM TG-186 MBCDAs with the same source position and planned dwell time was used to compare shielding effects and unblocked dose distributions. Acuros calculations employed solid applicators with shielded angles of 90°, 180°, and 270° from the TPS library, with tungsten alloy shielded segments. All calculations were performed in the water phantom. The differences between the AAPM TG-43 and TG-186 algorithms in these applicators were evaluated in terms of shielded angle, radioactive range, low dose bath background, and dose distribution. Patient planning using various shielded angle cylinders anteriorly or posteriorly to minimize local bladder or rectal dose on patient CT images for vaginal cuff treatment. The dwell time at the source position was calculated according to the 3D TG-43 algorithm, ignoring the shielding effect of the applicator to result in a cylindrically symmetrical dose distribution along the cylinder axis. Acuros dose calculation implemented Monte-Carlo (MC) algorithm approach. The 3D asymmetric dose distribution was shown in the sagittal view as expected. Low dose bath in the shielded areas was observed at approximately 10-15% of the prescribed dose. The low dose bath level changed slowly with shielding angle. The physical shielding angle was effectively shielded within the dose distribution range. The radioactive angle can be defined as the angle of the radioactive coverage portion from the source, or the angle between the designed isodose points to the center of cylindrical section. As showed in the figure below, a 180° shielded cylinder can shield a maximum range of about 210° in the posterior portion. When the sum of the shieling angle and radioactive angle was 360°, the radioactive angle was equal to 150°. This behavior was confirmed for shielding angles of 90°, 180°, and 270°, respectively in Acuros calculations. The radioactive angle was found to be smaller than the physical shielding angle. The presence of the metal block appeared to prevent deposition of scattered doses to unshielded tissue. This reduced scatter made the blocking angle projection wider than its physical angle. A slightly longer Acuros dwell time at a few percent was required to achieve the same dose level calculated for TG-43. Acuros calculations for shielded cylinder suggest that the shielded region in dose distribution is wider than the physically shielded part of segment. The radioactive angle is smaller than the physical shielded angle. Shielded areas are kept in low dose baths of prescribed doses. A slightly longer dwell time is required t","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO04 PO04
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.105
Yixiang Liao, Ken Tatebe, Julius Turian
Purpose The conventional vaginal cylinder design consists of cylindrical segments and a hemi-spherical top, with a diameter matched to the cylinder portion. This design is driven primarily by geometric simplicity, without much consideration for the dose distribution around the brachytherapy source, nor the anatomy of patients. Careful plan optimization is required to make the prescription isodose line conform to the surface of the cylinder. However, the conformity is not optimal due to the discrepancy between the cylinder shape and the intrinsic dose anisotropy of the source perpendicular to the azimuthal plane. We propose an alternative design for an ergonomic vaginal applicator (EVA), which requires minimal optimization, provides a more natural dose conformity, and is more ergonomic for the patient. Materials and Methods In treating with brachytherapy alone for postoperative endometrial cancer, our typical prescription is 6 Gy x 5 fractions to the surface, covering the top 4 cm of the vaginal cuff. To create the proposed applicator, the existing cylinder channel, using the first 10 dwell positions (5mm-interval), are uniformly loaded for 17.33 seconds with nominal 10 Ci Ir-192 HDR source (GammaMedPlusiX and Eclipse). The prescription isodose line then takes the shape of an ovoid, with 3 cm diameter at middle length, paralleling a typical size used for cylinder applicator treatments. Similarly, uniform loading times of 10, 13.6, 21.8, and 26.5 seconds correspond to maximal diameters of 2, 2.5, 3.5, and 4 cm, respectively. The prescription isodose line is converted to a contour that can be exported and used to construct an applicator. The surface of this applicator naturally conforms to the prescription isodose line, which removes the need for any further plan optimization. Dose along the surface and at 5mm distance from the applicator equator to the tip of the dome are reported. Results Using the 3 cm diameter case as an example, the average surface dose (± Std. Dev) is 100% ± 3.2% with the EVA, compared to 100% ± 5.5% with the conventional cylinder, showing improved surface dose homogeneity with EVA, even after extensive optimization of the cylinder plan. The doses at 5mm depth are comparable: 57.3 ± 6.8% and 57.9 ± 6.2%, respectively. In addition, the tapered tip of EVA is likely easier to implant and would cause less discomfort for patients. Another potential benefit of the EVA is that its tapered tip may be less likely to trap air bubbles between the applicator and the vaginal cuff. Conclusions A novel design for a vaginal applicator is achieved that requires minimal planning optimization, with improved surface dose homogeneity, and better ergonomics. These are expected to provide both superior dosimetry and better overall clinical experience. The conventional vaginal cylinder design consists of cylindrical segments and a hemi-spherical top, with a diameter matched to the cylinder portion. This design is driven primarily by geometric simplic
传统的阴道筒设计由圆柱形部分和半球形顶部组成,直径与筒体部分相匹配。这种设计主要是由几何的简单性驱动的,没有太多考虑近距离治疗源周围的剂量分布,也没有考虑患者的解剖结构。为了使处方等剂量线符合圆筒表面,需要仔细的计划优化。然而,由于圆柱体形状与垂直于方位面的源的本征剂量各向异性之间存在差异,一致性不是最优的。我们提出了一种人体工程学阴道涂抹器(EVA)的替代设计,它需要最小的优化,提供更自然的剂量一致性,并且对患者更符合人体工程学。材料与方法在子宫内膜癌术后单独近距离放疗时,我们的典型处方为6 Gy x 5次照射至表面,覆盖阴道袖带顶部4cm。为了创建建议的涂抹器,使用前10个停留位置(5mm间隔)的现有圆柱体通道,使用标称10 Ci Ir-192 HDR源(GammaMedPlusiX和Eclipse)均匀加载17.33秒。处方等剂量线呈卵形,中间长度直径为3厘米,与圆柱体涂抹器治疗的典型尺寸平行。同样,均匀加载时间分别为10、13.6、21.8和26.5秒时,最大直径分别为2、2.5、3.5和4 cm。将处方等剂量线转换为可导出并用于构建涂抹器的轮廓。这种涂抹器的表面自然符合处方等剂量线,这消除了任何进一步的计划优化的需要。剂量沿表面和在5mm距离从涂抹赤道到顶端的圆顶报告。结果以直径为3 cm的病例为例,EVA的平均表面剂量(±Std. Dev)为100%±3.2%,而常规圆柱体为100%±5.5%,即使对圆柱体方案进行了广泛优化,EVA的表面剂量均匀性也有所改善。5mm深度的剂量具有可比性:分别为57.3%±6.8%和57.9±6.2%。此外,EVA的锥形尖端可能更容易植入,并减少患者的不适。EVA的另一个潜在好处是,它的锥形尖端可能不太可能在涂抹器和阴道袖带之间捕获气泡。结论:一种新颖的阴道涂抹器设计,只需最小的规划优化,改善表面剂量均匀性,更好的人体工程学。这些有望提供更好的剂量学和更好的整体临床经验。传统的阴道筒设计由圆柱形部分和半球形顶部组成,直径与筒体部分相匹配。这种设计主要是由几何的简单性驱动的,没有太多考虑近距离治疗源周围的剂量分布,也没有考虑患者的解剖结构。为了使处方等剂量线符合圆筒表面,需要仔细的计划优化。然而,由于圆柱体形状与垂直于方位面的源的本征剂量各向异性之间存在差异,一致性不是最优的。我们提出了一种人体工程学阴道涂抹器(EVA)的替代设计,它需要最小的优化,提供更自然的剂量一致性,并且对患者更符合人体工程学。在术后子宫内膜癌的单独近距离放疗中,我们的典型处方是6 Gy x 5个分量到表面,覆盖阴道袖带顶部4cm。为了创建建议的涂抹器,使用前10个停留位置(5mm间隔)的现有圆柱体通道,使用标称10 Ci Ir-192 HDR源(GammaMedPlusiX和Eclipse)均匀加载17.33秒。处方等剂量线呈卵形,中间长度直径为3厘米,与圆柱体涂抹器治疗的典型尺寸平行。同样,均匀加载时间分别为10、13.6、21.8和26.5秒时,最大直径分别为2、2.5、3.5和4 cm。将处方等剂量线转换为可导出并用于构建涂抹器的轮廓。这种涂抹器的表面自然符合处方等剂量线,这消除了任何进一步的计划优化的需要。剂量沿表面和在5mm距离从涂抹赤道到顶端的圆顶报告。以直径为3 cm的病例为例,EVA的平均表面剂量(±Std. Dev)为100%±3.2%,而传统圆柱体为100%±5.5%,即使在对圆柱体方案进行了广泛优化后,EVA的表面剂量均匀性也得到了改善。5mm深度的剂量是相当的:57。 传统的阴道筒设计由圆柱形部分和半球形顶部组成,直径与筒体部分相匹配。这种设计主要是由几何的简单性驱动的,没有太多考虑近距离治疗源周围的剂量分布,也没有考虑患者的解剖结构。为了使处方等剂量线符合圆筒表面,需要仔细的计划优化。然而,由于圆柱体形状与垂直于方位面的源的本征剂量各向异性之间存在差异,一致性不是最优的。我们提出了一种人体工程学阴道涂抹器(EVA)的替代设计,它需要最小的优化,提供更自然的剂量一致性,并且对患者更符合人体工程学。材料与方法在子宫内膜癌术后单独近距离放疗时,我们的典型处方为6 Gy x 5次照射至表面,覆盖阴道袖带顶部4cm。为了创建建议的涂抹器,使用前10个停留位置(5mm间隔)的现有圆柱体通道,使用标称10 Ci Ir-192 HDR源(GammaMedPlusiX和Eclipse)均匀加载17.33秒。处方等剂量线呈卵形,中间长度直径为3厘米,与圆柱体涂抹器治疗的典型尺寸平行。同样,均匀加载时间分别为10、13.6、21.8和26.5秒时,最大直径分别为2、2.5、3.5和4 cm。将处方等剂量线转换为可导出并用于构建涂抹器的轮廓。这种涂抹器的表面自然符合处方等剂量线,这消除了任何进一步的计划优化的需要。剂量沿表面和在5mm距离从涂抹赤道到顶端的圆顶报告。结果以直径为3 cm的病例为例,EVA的平均表面剂量(±Std. Dev)为100%±3.2%,而常规圆柱体为100%±5.5%,即使对圆柱体方案进行了广泛优化,EVA的表面剂量均匀性也有所改善。5mm深度的剂量具有可比性:分别为57.3%±6.8%和57.9±6.2%。此外,EVA的锥形尖端可能更容易植入,并减少患者的不适。EVA的另一个潜在好处是,它的锥形尖端可能不太可能在涂抹器和阴道袖带之间捕获气泡。结论:一种新颖的阴道涂抹器设计,只需最小的规划优化,改善表面剂量均匀性,更好的人体工程学。这些有望提供更好的剂量学和更好的整体临床经验。传统的阴道筒设计由圆柱形部分和半球形顶部组成,直径与筒体部分相匹配。这种设计主要是由几何的简单性驱动的,没有太多考虑近距离治疗源周围的剂量分布,也没有考虑患者的解剖结构。为了使处方等剂量线符合圆筒表面,需要仔细的计划优化。然而,由于圆柱体形状与垂直于方位面的源的本征剂量各向异性之间存在差异,一致性不是最优的。我们提出了一种人体工程学阴道涂抹器(EVA)的替代设计,它需要最小的优化,提供更自然的剂量一致性,并且对患者更符合人体工程学。在术后子宫内膜癌的单独近距离放疗中,我们的典型处方是6 Gy x 5个分量到表面,覆盖阴道袖带顶部4cm。为了创建建议的涂抹器,使用前10个停留位置(5mm间隔)的现有圆柱体通道,使用标称10 Ci Ir-192 HDR源(GammaMedPlusiX和Eclipse)均匀加载17.33秒。处方等剂量线呈卵形,中间长度直径为3厘米,与圆柱体涂抹器治疗的典型尺寸平行。同样,均匀加载时间分别为10、13.6、21.8和26.5秒时,最大直径分别为2、2.5、3.5和4 cm。将处方等剂量线转换为可导出并用于构建涂抹器的轮廓。这种涂抹器的表面自然符合处方等剂量线,这消除了任何进一步的计划优化的需要。剂量沿表面和在5mm距离从涂抹赤道到顶端的圆顶报告。以直径为3 cm的病例为例,EVA的平均表面剂量(±Std. Dev)为100%±3.2%,而传统圆柱体为100%±5.5%,即使在对圆柱体方案进行了广泛优化后,EVA的表面剂量均匀性也得到了改善。5mm深度的剂量是相当的:57。 (3±6.8%)和(57.9±6.2%)。此外,EVA的锥形尖端可能更容易植
{"title":"PO04","authors":"Yixiang Liao, Ken Tatebe, Julius Turian","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.105","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The conventional vaginal cylinder design consists of cylindrical segments and a hemi-spherical top, with a diameter matched to the cylinder portion. This design is driven primarily by geometric simplicity, without much consideration for the dose distribution around the brachytherapy source, nor the anatomy of patients. Careful plan optimization is required to make the prescription isodose line conform to the surface of the cylinder. However, the conformity is not optimal due to the discrepancy between the cylinder shape and the intrinsic dose anisotropy of the source perpendicular to the azimuthal plane. We propose an alternative design for an ergonomic vaginal applicator (EVA), which requires minimal optimization, provides a more natural dose conformity, and is more ergonomic for the patient. Materials and Methods In treating with brachytherapy alone for postoperative endometrial cancer, our typical prescription is 6 Gy x 5 fractions to the surface, covering the top 4 cm of the vaginal cuff. To create the proposed applicator, the existing cylinder channel, using the first 10 dwell positions (5mm-interval), are uniformly loaded for 17.33 seconds with nominal 10 Ci Ir-192 HDR source (GammaMedPlusiX and Eclipse). The prescription isodose line then takes the shape of an ovoid, with 3 cm diameter at middle length, paralleling a typical size used for cylinder applicator treatments. Similarly, uniform loading times of 10, 13.6, 21.8, and 26.5 seconds correspond to maximal diameters of 2, 2.5, 3.5, and 4 cm, respectively. The prescription isodose line is converted to a contour that can be exported and used to construct an applicator. The surface of this applicator naturally conforms to the prescription isodose line, which removes the need for any further plan optimization. Dose along the surface and at 5mm distance from the applicator equator to the tip of the dome are reported. Results Using the 3 cm diameter case as an example, the average surface dose (± Std. Dev) is 100% ± 3.2% with the EVA, compared to 100% ± 5.5% with the conventional cylinder, showing improved surface dose homogeneity with EVA, even after extensive optimization of the cylinder plan. The doses at 5mm depth are comparable: 57.3 ± 6.8% and 57.9 ± 6.2%, respectively. In addition, the tapered tip of EVA is likely easier to implant and would cause less discomfort for patients. Another potential benefit of the EVA is that its tapered tip may be less likely to trap air bubbles between the applicator and the vaginal cuff. Conclusions A novel design for a vaginal applicator is achieved that requires minimal planning optimization, with improved surface dose homogeneity, and better ergonomics. These are expected to provide both superior dosimetry and better overall clinical experience. The conventional vaginal cylinder design consists of cylindrical segments and a hemi-spherical top, with a diameter matched to the cylinder portion. This design is driven primarily by geometric simplic","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO124 PO124
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.224
Javier Rodriguez Corredor
Worldwide, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has a high incidence. In 2020, Colombia, a Latin American country, had a NMSC incidence of 7.9 per 100.000 inhabitants. High Dose Rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy is a validated treatment option, with optimal and promising local control rates and cosmetic results, equivalent to surgical management and external radiation therapy. Nevertheless, this treatment technique may be scarce in Low Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), due to personnel training and technology requirements. We present the largest cohort of patients treated with HDR skin brachytherapy in Colombia, treated at the Colombian National Cancer Institute and a proposal for a low-priced, widely available, marker technique for Computed Tomography (CT) Simulation. This was a retrospective review of all patients with skin tumors treated with Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) surface cast brachytherapy from January 1, 2019, to January 28, 2023 at the National Institute of Medicine. cancerology, Bogota - Colombia. 44 lesions (36 patients) were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 76 years (range = 50-98). The majority were basal cell carcinomas (82%, n = 36), squamous cell carcinomas (15%, n =7 ), and one cutaneous lymphoma (3%, n = 1). Most of the lesions were located in the head region. and neck. The most used RT dose was 40 Gy/8 interday fractions; all patients had individualized CT-based planning with alternative donut-type fiducial markers. Six months survival (OS) was 94% and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 92%. Most of the deaths were from unrelated causes. Response was assessed in the clinic at 1 week and 2, 4, and 6 months after treatment. Our complete response (CR) rate was 97%, with partial response in one patient, we reported a local control (CL) rate at 6 months of 86%, and local recurrence in one patient. The procedure was well tolerated, with no grade 3-5 acute or late toxicities assessed on the RTOG and LENT/SOME scales. The median depth of the isodose line at 100% was 0.5 cm and the median surface dose = 120%. The median V 90 = 93%. Surface brachytherapy is an excellent alternative for the treatment of non-melanoma cancer, with response rates and effective local cancer control. In low-resource countries, treatments such as brachytherapy improve patient adherence, becoming future perspectives to be implemented. challenges in techniques, dosimetry, and casts provide challenges that evoke recursive solutions like our donut radiopaque fiduciary, thus demonstrating the skills of the radiation oncologist in the face of variability.
在世界范围内,非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)的发病率很高。2020年,拉丁美洲国家哥伦比亚的NMSC发病率为每10万居民7.9例。高剂量率(HDR)皮肤近距离放疗是一种经过验证的治疗选择,具有最佳和有希望的局部控制率和美容效果,相当于手术治疗和外部放射治疗。然而,由于人员培训和技术要求,这种治疗技术在中低收入国家(LMICs)可能很少。我们介绍了在哥伦比亚国家癌症研究所接受HDR皮肤近距离放射治疗的最大队列患者,并提出了一种廉价、广泛可用的计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟标记技术的建议。这是一项对2019年1月1日至2023年1月28日在美国国家医学研究所接受Ir-192高剂量率(HDR)表面铸型近距离放射治疗的所有皮肤肿瘤患者的回顾性研究。36例患者共发现44个病灶。诊断时的中位年龄为76岁(范围50-98岁)。多数为基底细胞癌(82%,n = 36)、鳞状细胞癌(15%,n =7)和1例皮肤淋巴瘤(3%,n = 1)。大多数病变位于头部区域。和颈部。最常用的放射治疗剂量为40 Gy/8日间剂量;所有患者都有个体化的基于ct的计划和可选择的甜甜圈型基准标记。6个月生存率(OS)为94%,6个月无进展生存率(PFS)为92%。大多数死亡是由不相关的原因造成的。分别于治疗后1周、2、4、6个月进行临床疗效评估。我们的完全缓解(CR)率为97%,其中1例患者部分缓解,我们报告6个月时局部控制(CL)率为86%,1例患者局部复发。该手术耐受性良好,在RTOG和LENT/SOME量表上没有评估到3-5级急性或晚期毒性。100%处等剂量线的中位深度为0.5 cm,中位表面剂量= 120%。中位数v90 = 93%。表面近距离放射治疗是治疗非黑色素瘤癌症的一个很好的选择,具有反应率和有效的局部癌症控制。在资源匮乏的国家,近距离治疗等治疗方法提高了患者的依从性,成为未来实施的前景。技术、剂量学和铸型方面的挑战提出了递归解决方案,就像我们的甜甜圈不透射线信托一样,从而展示了放射肿瘤学家面对变变性的技能。
{"title":"PO124","authors":"Javier Rodriguez Corredor","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.224","url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has a high incidence. In 2020, Colombia, a Latin American country, had a NMSC incidence of 7.9 per 100.000 inhabitants. High Dose Rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy is a validated treatment option, with optimal and promising local control rates and cosmetic results, equivalent to surgical management and external radiation therapy. Nevertheless, this treatment technique may be scarce in Low Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), due to personnel training and technology requirements. We present the largest cohort of patients treated with HDR skin brachytherapy in Colombia, treated at the Colombian National Cancer Institute and a proposal for a low-priced, widely available, marker technique for Computed Tomography (CT) Simulation. This was a retrospective review of all patients with skin tumors treated with Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) surface cast brachytherapy from January 1, 2019, to January 28, 2023 at the National Institute of Medicine. cancerology, Bogota - Colombia. 44 lesions (36 patients) were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 76 years (range = 50-98). The majority were basal cell carcinomas (82%, n = 36), squamous cell carcinomas (15%, n =7 ), and one cutaneous lymphoma (3%, n = 1). Most of the lesions were located in the head region. and neck. The most used RT dose was 40 Gy/8 interday fractions; all patients had individualized CT-based planning with alternative donut-type fiducial markers. Six months survival (OS) was 94% and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 92%. Most of the deaths were from unrelated causes. Response was assessed in the clinic at 1 week and 2, 4, and 6 months after treatment. Our complete response (CR) rate was 97%, with partial response in one patient, we reported a local control (CL) rate at 6 months of 86%, and local recurrence in one patient. The procedure was well tolerated, with no grade 3-5 acute or late toxicities assessed on the RTOG and LENT/SOME scales. The median depth of the isodose line at 100% was 0.5 cm and the median surface dose = 120%. The median V 90 = 93%. Surface brachytherapy is an excellent alternative for the treatment of non-melanoma cancer, with response rates and effective local cancer control. In low-resource countries, treatments such as brachytherapy improve patient adherence, becoming future perspectives to be implemented. challenges in techniques, dosimetry, and casts provide challenges that evoke recursive solutions like our donut radiopaque fiduciary, thus demonstrating the skills of the radiation oncologist in the face of variability.","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO72 PO72
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.173
Evans Amoah, Jeremiah Johnson, Stephen Strup, Ali Soleimani-Meigooni, William St. Clair
Purpose Radiation management literature focused on optimizing care for patients with intellectual disability is sparse. We add our experience to the literature with the goal to improve care to this vulnerable patient population. To this end, we report three cases of prostate cancer in patients with limited cognition who were treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy to highlight an effective strategy to deliver optimal care to this group of patients. Materials and Methods This is a case series of three adult male patients with limited cognition each of whom developed prostate cancer which was managed primarily with LDR brachytherapy. Results Patient #1: A 53-year-old male with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PSA 8.8 ng/ml, Grade Group 2), Patient #2: a 68-year-old male with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (PSA 12.6 ng/ml, Grade Group 3), and Patient #3: a 52-year-old male with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA 24 ng/ml, Grade Group 1), all of whom had intellectual disability, were evaluated for radiation therapy. A thorough discussion occurred with each patient and their legal guardian about prostate cancer therapy options including surgery versus radiation treatment with or without androgen deprivation therapy. Radiation therapy treatment strategies presented included low dose rate brachytherapy versus external beam radiation treatment including SBRT to a total dose of 3625 cGy in 5 fractions every other day or a moderately hypofractionated regimen to a total dose of 7000 cGy in 28 daily fractions Monday to Friday. In each case, a shared decision was made for each patient to undergo interstitial prostate seed implant. Of note, two out of the three patients lived more than an hour away from the radiation treatment center and relied on family support for transportation needs. Each patient initially underwent a prostate volume study with a transrectal ultrasound to 1) determine the dimensions of the prostate and 2) develop a plan for radiation dose coverage of the prostate with interstitial Cs-131 brachytherapy seeds. Each patient then underwent seed implantation under anesthesia followed by fluoroscopy and post-implant CT, to assess for appropriate seed placement as well as the post-implant dosimetry. Patient #1 received a total prescription dose of 110 Gy to the prostate D90 using 61 sources each with a strength of 1.6 U per seed for a total strength of 97.6 U and at 14 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 1.7 ng/ml from 8.8 ng/ml. Patient #2 received a total prescription dose of 100 Gy to the prostate D90 using 59 sources each with a strength of 1.43 U per seed for a total strength of 84.37 U, and at 38 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 0.018 ng/ml from 12.6 ng/ml. Patient #3 received 115 Gy to the prostate D90 using 90 sources each with a strength of 1.8 U per seed for a total of 162 U, and at 34 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 0.8 ng/mL from 24 ng/ml. In all three cases, treatment
目的:关注智力残疾患者放射治疗的文献很少。我们将我们的经验添加到文献中,目标是改善对这一弱势患者群体的护理。为此,我们报告了三例认知能力有限的前列腺癌患者接受低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗的病例,以强调为这组患者提供最佳护理的有效策略。材料和方法:本研究是一个由三名认知能力有限的成年男性患者组成的病例系列,他们都患有前列腺癌,主要采用LDR近距离放射治疗。结果患者#1:53岁男性,有利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 8.8 ng/ml, 2级组),患者#2:68岁男性,不利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 12.6 ng/ml, 3级组),患者#3:52岁男性,高危前列腺癌(PSA 24 ng/ml, 1级组),所有患者均有智力障碍,评估放射治疗。与每位患者及其法定监护人就前列腺癌治疗方案进行了深入的讨论,包括手术与放射治疗,以及是否进行雄激素剥夺治疗。所提出的放射治疗策略包括低剂量率近距离治疗与外部束放射治疗,包括SBRT,总剂量为3625 cGy,每隔一天5次,或中度低分割方案,总剂量为7000 cGy,周一至周五,每天28次。在每个病例中,共同决定每个患者接受间质前列腺种子植入。值得注意的是,三名患者中有两名住在距离放射治疗中心一个多小时的地方,交通需要依靠家人的支持。每位患者最初都通过经直肠超声检查前列腺体积,1)确定前列腺的尺寸,2)制定间质Cs-131近距离放射治疗种子对前列腺的辐射剂量覆盖计划。然后,每位患者在麻醉下进行粒子植入,然后进行透视和植入后CT检查,以评估合适的粒子放置以及植入后剂量测定。患者1接受了处方总剂量为110 Gy的前列腺D90,使用61个源,每个源的强度为1.6 U,总强度为97.6 U,在14个月的随访中,他的PSA从8.8 ng/ml降至1.7 ng/ml。患者2使用59个源,每个源的强度为1.43 U /粒,总强度为84.37 U,对前列腺D90的总处方剂量为100 Gy,在38个月的随访中,他的PSA从12.6 ng/ml降至0.018 ng/ml。患者3接受了115 Gy的前列腺D90治疗,使用90个源,每个源的强度为1.8 U,总计162 U,在34个月的随访中,他的PSA从24 ng/mL降至0.8 ng/mL。在所有三个病例中,治疗完成无并发症,没有CTCAE 3级或更高的毒性。结论低剂量率近距离放疗是认知能力有限的非转移性前列腺癌患者的一种较好的治疗方法。它提供了足够的肿瘤控制和可接受的辐射诱导毒性。它只需要两次前往放射治疗中心,从而减少了与多次治疗相关的交通负担。镇静的使用减少了外部放射治疗中患者固定所遇到的挑战。而且,它比手术侵入性小。LDR近距离治疗的这些优点对认知能力有限的患者非常有用。因此,在适用的情况下,应该强烈考虑LDR近距离治疗。针对智力残疾患者优化护理的放射管理文献很少。我们将我们的经验添加到文献中,目标是改善对这一弱势患者群体的护理。为此,我们报告了三例认知能力有限的前列腺癌患者接受低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗的病例,以强调为这组患者提供最佳护理的有效策略。这是一个由三名认知能力有限的成年男性患者组成的病例系列,他们都患上了前列腺癌,主要采用LDR近距离放射治疗。患者#1:53岁男性,有利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 8.8 ng/ml, 2级组),患者#2:68岁男性,不利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 12.6 ng/ml, 3级组),患者#3:52岁男性,高危前列腺癌(PSA 24 ng/ml, 1级组),所有患者均有智力残疾,评估放射治疗。 目的:关注智力残疾患者放射治疗的文献很少。我们将我们的经验添加到文献中,目标是改善对这一弱势患者群体的护理。为此,我们报告了三例认知能力有限的前列腺癌患者接受低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗的病例,以强调为这组患者提供最佳护理的有效策略。材料和方法:本研究是一个由三名认知能力有限的成年男性患者组成的病例系列,他们都患有前列腺癌,主要采用LDR近距离放射治疗。结果患者#1:53岁男性,有利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 8.8 ng/ml, 2级组),患者#2:68岁男性,不利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 12.6 ng/ml, 3级组),患者#3:52岁男性,高危前列腺癌(PSA 24 ng/ml, 1级组),所有患者均有智力障碍,评估放射治疗。与每位患者及其法定监护人就前列腺癌治疗方案进行了深入的讨论,包括手术与放射治疗,以及是否进行雄激素剥夺治疗。所提出的放射治疗策略包括低剂量率近距离治疗与外部束放射治疗,包括SBRT,总剂量为3625 cGy,每隔一天5次,或中度低分割方案,总剂量为7000 cGy,周一至周五,每天28次。在每个病例中,共同决定每个患者接受间质前列腺种子植入。值得注意的是,三名患者中有两名住在距离放射治疗中心一个多小时的地方,交通需要依靠家人的支持。每位患者最初都通过经直肠超声检查前列腺体积,1)确定前列腺的尺寸,2)制定间质Cs-131近距离放射治疗种子对前列腺的辐射剂量覆盖计划。然后,每位患者在麻醉下进行粒子植入,然后进行透视和植入后CT检查,以评估合适的粒子放置以及植入后剂量测定。患者1接受了处方总剂量为110 Gy的前列腺D90,使用61个源,每个源的强度为1.6 U,总强度为97.6 U,在14个月的随访中,他的PSA从8.8 ng/ml降至1.7 ng/ml。患者2使用59个源,每个源的强度为1.43 U /粒,总强度为84.37 U,对前列腺D90的总处方剂量为100 Gy,在38个月的随访中,他的PSA从12.6 ng/ml降至0.018 ng/ml。患者3接受了115 Gy的前列腺D90治疗,使用90个源,每个源的强度为1.8 U,总计162 U,在34个月的随访中,他的PSA从24 ng/mL降至0.8 ng/mL。在所有三个病例中,治疗完成无并发症,没有CTCAE 3级或更高的毒性。结论低剂量率近距离放疗是认知能力有限的非转移性前列腺癌患者的一种较好的治疗方法。它提供了足够的肿瘤控制和可接受的辐射诱导毒性。它只需要两次前往放射治疗中心,从而减少了与多次治疗相关的交通负担。镇静的使用减少了外部放射治疗中患者固定所遇到的挑战。而且,它比手术侵入性小。LDR近距离治疗的这些优点对认知能力有限的患者非常有用。因此,在适用的情况下,应该强烈考虑LDR近距离治疗。针对智力残疾患者优化护理的放射管理文献很少。我们将我们的经验添加到文献中,目标是改善对这一弱势患者群体的护理。为此,我们报告了三例认知能力有限的前列腺癌患者接受低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗的病例,以强调为这组患者提供最佳护理的有效策略。这是一个由三名认知能力有限的成年男性患者组成的病例系列,他们都患上了前列腺癌,主要采用LDR近距离放射治疗。患者#1:53岁男性,有利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 8.8 ng/ml, 2级组),患者#2:68岁男性,不利的中危前列腺癌(PSA 12.6 ng/ml, 3级组),患者#3:52岁男性,高危前列腺癌(PSA 24 ng/ml, 1级组),所有患者均有智力残疾,评估放射治疗。 与每位患者及其法定监护人就前列腺癌治疗方案进行了深入的讨论,包括手术与放射治
{"title":"PO72","authors":"Evans Amoah, Jeremiah Johnson, Stephen Strup, Ali Soleimani-Meigooni, William St. Clair","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.173","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Radiation management literature focused on optimizing care for patients with intellectual disability is sparse. We add our experience to the literature with the goal to improve care to this vulnerable patient population. To this end, we report three cases of prostate cancer in patients with limited cognition who were treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy to highlight an effective strategy to deliver optimal care to this group of patients. Materials and Methods This is a case series of three adult male patients with limited cognition each of whom developed prostate cancer which was managed primarily with LDR brachytherapy. Results Patient #1: A 53-year-old male with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PSA 8.8 ng/ml, Grade Group 2), Patient #2: a 68-year-old male with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (PSA 12.6 ng/ml, Grade Group 3), and Patient #3: a 52-year-old male with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA 24 ng/ml, Grade Group 1), all of whom had intellectual disability, were evaluated for radiation therapy. A thorough discussion occurred with each patient and their legal guardian about prostate cancer therapy options including surgery versus radiation treatment with or without androgen deprivation therapy. Radiation therapy treatment strategies presented included low dose rate brachytherapy versus external beam radiation treatment including SBRT to a total dose of 3625 cGy in 5 fractions every other day or a moderately hypofractionated regimen to a total dose of 7000 cGy in 28 daily fractions Monday to Friday. In each case, a shared decision was made for each patient to undergo interstitial prostate seed implant. Of note, two out of the three patients lived more than an hour away from the radiation treatment center and relied on family support for transportation needs. Each patient initially underwent a prostate volume study with a transrectal ultrasound to 1) determine the dimensions of the prostate and 2) develop a plan for radiation dose coverage of the prostate with interstitial Cs-131 brachytherapy seeds. Each patient then underwent seed implantation under anesthesia followed by fluoroscopy and post-implant CT, to assess for appropriate seed placement as well as the post-implant dosimetry. Patient #1 received a total prescription dose of 110 Gy to the prostate D90 using 61 sources each with a strength of 1.6 U per seed for a total strength of 97.6 U and at 14 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 1.7 ng/ml from 8.8 ng/ml. Patient #2 received a total prescription dose of 100 Gy to the prostate D90 using 59 sources each with a strength of 1.43 U per seed for a total strength of 84.37 U, and at 38 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 0.018 ng/ml from 12.6 ng/ml. Patient #3 received 115 Gy to the prostate D90 using 90 sources each with a strength of 1.8 U per seed for a total of 162 U, and at 34 months follow up, his PSA had decreased to 0.8 ng/mL from 24 ng/ml. In all three cases, treatment","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO22 PO22
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.123
Yoshiaki Takagawa, Masanori Machida, Ichiro Seto, Shinya Komori, Hiroki Sato, Hiroko Midorikawa, Masao Murakami
{"title":"PO22","authors":"Yoshiaki Takagawa, Masanori Machida, Ichiro Seto, Shinya Komori, Hiroki Sato, Hiroko Midorikawa, Masao Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.123","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO32 PO32
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.133
Madison Nichols, Gary Lewis
{"title":"PO32","authors":"Madison Nichols, Gary Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.133","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO13 PO13
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.114
Saryleine Ortiz de Choudens, Christina Small-Tom, Lindsey McAlarnen, Susan Duyar, Rebekah Summey, Erin Bishop, Elizabeth Hopp, William Bradley, Denise Uyar, Janet S. Rader, Meena Bedi, Beth Erickson
Purpose Dose intensive image-based brachytherapy has become the gold standard treatment for cervical cancer, with an improvement in disease control and radiation-induced morbidity. A significant contribution to dose escalation has been the addition of needles to intracavitary applicators, with both hybrid and template-based insertions. These applications afford brachytherapists more flexibility of dose shaping and tumor coverage, while sparing organs at risk. Many of these procedures can now be performed in departmental brachytherapy suites within radiation oncology departments, where support from other hospital teams is not always readily available. One of the most feared complications during removal of interstitial brachytherapy applicators is a bleeding event, which can range from minor blood loss to life threatening bleeding. In particular, the use of needles that are inserted into the highly vascular vaginal, cervical and parametrial tissues can increase the risk of these events, including injury of venous and arterial structures. Being prepared for potential bleeding events is of the utmost importance in order to ensure a rapid and effective response. Materials and Methods Our goal is to establish a set of guidelines which can be used to prepare for and treat bleeding events during gynecologic brachytherapy. The proposed methods have been used at our institution and were developed in collaboration with the gynecology oncology team. Results First, we recommend pre-operative evaluation of blood counts following chemoradiation, pre-existing bleeding disorders, anticoagulant use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and disease location. A full pre-operative evaluation by a trained anesthesiologist can expedite this evaluation. Blood counts and electrolytes should be obtained on procedure day and prior to needle insertion, and if necessary, significant pre-procedure abnormalities addressed with transfusions or other supplements. Assessment of the location of residual disease and proximity to nearby vessels, as well as the projected location and number of needles is strategic. Considerations for removal of inpatient applications where multiple fractions have been delivered over several days should include timing of prophylactic anticoagulation discontinuation, pre-pull hemoglobin/hematocrit/platelet levels, and if needed, transfusion prior to applicator removal. For all patients, continuous monitoring of vitals before and during applicator removal, as well as dual IV access and blood type and crossing should be considered. IV fluids should be readily available should bleeding cause a drop in blood pressure. Preparation of a fully equipped vaginal packing kit complete with speculums, ring forceps, packing gauze, saline, lubricant and Monsel's solution is essential. For severe bleeding events, with rapid emergence of symptomatic anemia including tachycardia, hypotension, pallor, dizziness or other subjective symptoms, a rapid response team sh
目的剂量强化影像近距离放射治疗已成为宫颈癌的金标准治疗方法,在疾病控制和辐射引起的发病率方面有所改善。对剂量增加的一个重要贡献是在腔内应用器中增加了针,包括混合型和基于模板的插入。这些应用为近距离治疗师提供了更大的剂量塑造和肿瘤覆盖的灵活性,同时保留了处于危险中的器官。许多此类手术现在可以在放射肿瘤科的部门近距离治疗套房中进行,而其他医院团队的支持并不总是现成的。在移除间质性近距离放疗涂敷器时,最可怕的并发症之一是出血事件,其范围可以从少量失血到危及生命的出血。特别是,将针头插入高度血管化的阴道、宫颈和旁系组织会增加这些事件的风险,包括静脉和动脉结构的损伤。为潜在出血事件做好准备对于确保快速有效的反应至关重要。材料和方法我们的目标是建立一套指导方针,可用于妇科近距离治疗中出血事件的准备和治疗。所提出的方法已在我们的机构使用,并与妇科肿瘤团队合作开发。首先,我们建议术前评估放化疗后的血细胞计数、先前存在的出血性疾病、抗凝剂的使用、非甾体抗炎药的使用和疾病部位。由训练有素的麻醉师进行全面的术前评估可以加快这一评估。应在手术当天和插针前检测血液计数和电解质,如有必要,应通过输血或其他补充来处理手术前的重大异常。评估残留疾病的位置和邻近血管的接近程度,以及针的预计位置和数量是有战略意义的。对于在几天内多次给药的住院患者,去除涂药时应考虑预防性停药的时机、拔药前血红蛋白/红细胞压积/血小板水平,如果需要,在去除涂药器之前输血。对于所有患者,应考虑在拔除涂药器之前和期间持续监测生命体征,以及双重静脉注射和血型和交叉。如果出血导致血压下降,应随时准备静脉输液。准备一个装备齐全的阴道填塞包,包括窥镜、环钳、填塞纱布、生理盐水、润滑剂和蒙塞尔溶液是必不可少的。对于严重出血事件,迅速出现症状性贫血,包括心动过速、低血压、苍白、头晕或其他主观症状,应在阴道填塞时启动快速反应小组。此外,在拔除前或拔除时提醒妇科肿瘤小组成员可以加快对高危病例的干预。对于持续出血和怀疑血管损伤,介入放射科医师急诊经皮盆腔血管栓塞是一种有效的策略。术后监测血液计数和生命体征,以及考虑入院是重要的干预措施。结论:组织近距离治疗团队应对拔除涂敷器时的出血事件是实施间隙性技术时不可或缺的责任。有一个有组织的方法来应对这些突发事件,对于防止不良后果和维持这些应用程序提供的重要好处至关重要。剂量强化影像近距离放射治疗已成为宫颈癌的金标准治疗方法,在疾病控制和辐射引起的发病率方面有所改善。对剂量增加的一个重要贡献是在腔内应用器中增加了针,包括混合型和基于模板的插入。这些应用为近距离治疗师提供了更大的剂量塑造和肿瘤覆盖的灵活性,同时保留了处于危险中的器官。许多此类手术现在可以在放射肿瘤科的部门近距离治疗套房中进行,而其他医院团队的支持并不总是现成的。在移除间质性近距离放疗涂敷器时,最可怕的并发症之一是出血事件,其范围可以从少量失血到危及生命的出血。特别是,将针头插入高度血管化的阴道、宫颈和旁系组织会增加这些事件的风险,包括静脉和动脉结构的损伤。 目的剂量强化影像近距离放射治疗已成为宫颈癌的金标准治疗方法,在疾病控制和辐射引起的发病率方面有所改善。对剂量增加的一个重要贡献是在腔内应用器中增加了针,包括混合型和基于模板的插入。这些应用为近距离治疗师提供了更大的剂量塑造和肿瘤覆盖的灵活性,同时保留了处于危险中的器官。许多此类手术现在可以在放射肿瘤科的部门近距离治疗套房中进行,而其他医院团队的支持并不总是现成的。在移除间质性近距离放疗涂敷器时,最可怕的并发症之一是出血事件,其范围可以从少量失血到危及生命的出血。特别是,将针头插入高度血管化的阴道、宫颈和旁系组织会增加这些事件的风险,包括静脉和动脉结构的损伤。为潜在出血事件做好准备对于确保快速有效的反应至关重要。材料和方法我们的目标是建立一套指导方针,可用于妇科近距离治疗中出血事件的准备和治疗。所提出的方法已在我们的机构使用,并与妇科肿瘤团队合作开发。首先,我们建议术前评估放化疗后的血细胞计数、先前存在的出血性疾病、抗凝剂的使用、非甾体抗炎药的使用和疾病部位。由训练有素的麻醉师进行全面的术前评估可以加快这一评估。应在手术当天和插针前检测血液计数和电解质,如有必要,应通过输血或其他补充来处理手术前的重大异常。评估残留疾病的位置和邻近血管的接近程度,以及针的预计位置和数量是有战略意义的。对于在几天内多次给药的住院患者,去除涂药时应考虑预防性停药的时机、拔药前血红蛋白/红细胞压积/血小板水平,如果需要,在去除涂药器之前输血。对于所有患者,应考虑在拔除涂药器之前和期间持续监测生命体征,以及双重静脉注射和血型和交叉。如果出血导致血压下降,应随时准备静脉输液。准备一个装备齐全的阴道填塞包,包括窥镜、环钳、填塞纱布、生理盐水、润滑剂和蒙塞尔溶液是必不可少的。对于严重出血事件,迅速出现症状性贫血,包括心动过速、低血压、苍白、头晕或其他主观症状,应在阴道填塞时启动快速反应小组。此外,在拔除前或拔除时提醒妇科肿瘤小组成员可以加快对高危病例的干预。对于持续出血和怀疑血管损伤,介入放射科医师急诊经皮盆腔血管栓塞是一种有效的策略。术后监测血液计数和生命体征,以及考虑入院是重要的干预措施。结论:组织近距离治疗团队应对拔除涂敷器时的出血事件是实施间隙性技术时不可或缺的责任。有一个有组织的方法来应对这些突发事件,对于防止不良后果和维持这些应用程序提供的重要好处至关重要。剂量强化影像近距离放射治疗已成为宫颈癌的金标准治疗方法,在疾病控制和辐射引起的发病率方面有所改善。对剂量增加的一个重要贡献是在腔内应用器中增加了针,包括混合型和基于模板的插入。这些应用为近距离治疗师提供了更大的剂量塑造和肿瘤覆盖的灵活性,同时保留了处于危险中的器官。许多此类手术现在可以在放射肿瘤科的部门近距离治疗套房中进行,而其他医院团队的支持并不总是现成的。在移除间质性近距离放疗涂敷器时,最可怕的并发症之一是出血事件,其范围可以从少量失血到危及生命的出血。特别是,将针头插入高度血管化的阴道、宫颈和旁系组织会增加这些事件的风险,包括静脉和动脉结构的损伤。 为潜在出血事件做好准备对于确保快速有效的反应至关重要。我们的目标是建立一套指导方针,可用于妇科近距离放疗中出血事件的准备和治疗。所提出的方法已在我们的机构使用,并与妇科肿瘤团队合作开发。首先,我们建议术前评估放化疗后的血细胞计数、先前存在的出血性疾病、抗凝剂的使用、非甾体抗炎药的使用和疾病部位。由训练有素的麻醉师进行全面的术前评估可以加快这一评估。应在手术当天和插针前检测血液计数和电解质,如有必要,应通过输血或其他补充来处理手术前的重大异常。评估残留疾病的位置和邻近血管的接近程度,以及针的预计位置和数量是有战略意义的。对于在几天内多次给药的住院患者,去除涂药时应考虑预防性停药的时机、拔药前血红蛋白/红细胞压积/血小板水平,如果需要,在去除涂药器之前输血。对于所有患者,应考虑在拔除涂药器之前和期间持续监测生命体征,以及双重静脉注射和血型和交叉。如果出血导致血压下降,应随时准备静脉输液。准备一个装备齐全的阴道填塞包,包括窥镜、环钳、填塞纱布、生理盐水、润滑剂和蒙塞尔溶液是必不可少的。对于严重出血事件,迅速出现症状性贫血,包括心
{"title":"PO13","authors":"Saryleine Ortiz de Choudens, Christina Small-Tom, Lindsey McAlarnen, Susan Duyar, Rebekah Summey, Erin Bishop, Elizabeth Hopp, William Bradley, Denise Uyar, Janet S. Rader, Meena Bedi, Beth Erickson","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.114","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Dose intensive image-based brachytherapy has become the gold standard treatment for cervical cancer, with an improvement in disease control and radiation-induced morbidity. A significant contribution to dose escalation has been the addition of needles to intracavitary applicators, with both hybrid and template-based insertions. These applications afford brachytherapists more flexibility of dose shaping and tumor coverage, while sparing organs at risk. Many of these procedures can now be performed in departmental brachytherapy suites within radiation oncology departments, where support from other hospital teams is not always readily available. One of the most feared complications during removal of interstitial brachytherapy applicators is a bleeding event, which can range from minor blood loss to life threatening bleeding. In particular, the use of needles that are inserted into the highly vascular vaginal, cervical and parametrial tissues can increase the risk of these events, including injury of venous and arterial structures. Being prepared for potential bleeding events is of the utmost importance in order to ensure a rapid and effective response. Materials and Methods Our goal is to establish a set of guidelines which can be used to prepare for and treat bleeding events during gynecologic brachytherapy. The proposed methods have been used at our institution and were developed in collaboration with the gynecology oncology team. Results First, we recommend pre-operative evaluation of blood counts following chemoradiation, pre-existing bleeding disorders, anticoagulant use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and disease location. A full pre-operative evaluation by a trained anesthesiologist can expedite this evaluation. Blood counts and electrolytes should be obtained on procedure day and prior to needle insertion, and if necessary, significant pre-procedure abnormalities addressed with transfusions or other supplements. Assessment of the location of residual disease and proximity to nearby vessels, as well as the projected location and number of needles is strategic. Considerations for removal of inpatient applications where multiple fractions have been delivered over several days should include timing of prophylactic anticoagulation discontinuation, pre-pull hemoglobin/hematocrit/platelet levels, and if needed, transfusion prior to applicator removal. For all patients, continuous monitoring of vitals before and during applicator removal, as well as dual IV access and blood type and crossing should be considered. IV fluids should be readily available should bleeding cause a drop in blood pressure. Preparation of a fully equipped vaginal packing kit complete with speculums, ring forceps, packing gauze, saline, lubricant and Monsel's solution is essential. For severe bleeding events, with rapid emergence of symptomatic anemia including tachycardia, hypotension, pallor, dizziness or other subjective symptoms, a rapid response team sh","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO99 PO99
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.200
Kaile Li
{"title":"PO99","authors":"Kaile Li","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO44 PO44
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.145
Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo, Rohini Bhatia, Elliphine Gwangwava, Thabiso Itshabeng, Surbhi Grover
Purpose Cervical cancer is the most common cancer treated with radiation in Botswana. There is a single linear accelerator and a single HDR brachytherapy unit in the country, treating a median of 200 cervical cancer cases year. About 80% of these are treated with curative intent, using concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost. Patients in Botswana often present with advanced disease and very bulky tumours. Traditionally, patients who can not have brachytherapy are sent for external beam boost. This not only adds burden onto the very busy single Linac, but also outcomes of patients are compromised. We highlight here seven cases with novel insertions for patients who would have been deemed ineligible for brachytherapy. Materials and Methods We retrospectively revised the records of cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy in January 2023, 29 in total. Brachytherapy was delivered in the final week of external beam radiation, or after completion for bulky tumours. The mean age was 46 years and most patients (22, 76%) presented with stage IIB or IIIB, six patients had undergone hysterectomy for stage IB disease. Applicators available were tandem and ovoids, tandem and ring, tandem and cylinder, and cylinder post hysterectomy. Twelve patients (41%) needed interstitial needles. However, seven patients(24%) would previously have been deemed unsuitable for brachytherapy with these applicators due to: 1. Bulky disease with poor response to external beam brachytherapy (three patients). 2. Effaced or destroyed cervix and cavitation at vault post EBRT, traditional tandem and cylinder would not fit (three patients) 3. Stenosis at vault smallest ovoids could not fit and tandem and cylinder would not give adequate dose to bulky tumour (one patient). Results We successfully used three non-conventional methods to complete brachytherapy using available applicators, to treat the 7 patients who would have been deemed ineligible for brachytherapy. Fig. 1. illustrates images from three of the seven patients treated this way. Patient 1: A 55 year old patient with bulky local disease and poor response to EBRT. On day 55, mass still bulky; failed to insert traditional instruments. We inserted tandem and interstitial wires only with no ovoids. Patient 2: A 42 year old patient with stage IIB cancer of the cervix. Cervix had been completely destroyed post external beam radiation, which then created a small cavity at the vault. No gross residual disease. An intrauterine tandem was inserted, then a small (2cm) cylinder was placed into the vault cavity, followed by three 3.5cm cylinders. Patient 3: A 60 year old patient with Stage IIIB cancer of the cervix with bulk of tumour on the left.The smallest ovoids could not fit at the vault, yet tandem and cylinder would not give enough dose coverage especially to the left. A tandem and left ovoid only were inserted, with interstitial wires on the left. All three patients managed to complete radical chemo radiatio
目的宫颈癌是博茨瓦纳最常见的放射治疗癌症。全国只有一个直线加速器和一个HDR近距离治疗单位,每年治疗宫颈癌病例的中位数为200例。其中约80%以治疗为目的,使用同步放化疗和近距离强化治疗。博茨瓦纳的病人通常病情严重,肿瘤很大。传统上,不能接受近距离治疗的患者会接受外部光束增强治疗。这不仅增加了非常繁忙的单一Linac的负担,而且还损害了患者的预后。我们在这里强调7例新的插入患者谁将被认为不符合近距离治疗。材料与方法回顾性分析2023年1月29例接受近距离放疗的宫颈癌患者资料。近距离放射治疗在外部放射治疗的最后一周进行,或在大肿瘤完成后进行。平均年龄为46岁,大多数患者(22.76%)表现为IIB期或IIIB期,6例患者因IB期疾病接受了子宫切除术。可使用的涂抹器有串联和卵形,串联和环形,串联和圆柱形,以及子宫切除术后的圆柱形。12名患者(41%)需要间质性针头。然而,7名患者(24%)先前被认为不适合使用这些涂抹器进行近距离治疗,原因如下:体积大的疾病,对外部光束近距离治疗反应差(3例)。2. 宫颈被抹去或破坏,穹窿后EBRT出现空化,传统的串联和圆柱不适合(3例)。拱顶最小卵泡狭窄不能适应,串联和圆柱不能给大体积肿瘤足够的剂量(1例)。结果7例不适合近距离放疗的患者均成功使用3种非常规方法完成近距离放疗。图1所示。以这种方式治疗的7名患者中有3名的图像。患者1:55岁,局部病变大,对EBRT反应差。第55天,质量仍然很大;未能插入传统仪器。我们只插入串联和间质丝,没有卵圆。患者2:一名42岁的IIB期宫颈癌患者。子宫颈在外部光束辐射后被完全破坏,然后在拱顶处形成了一个小洞。无明显残留病变。先置入宫内双柱,再置入一个2cm的小圆筒,再置入三个3.5cm的圆筒。患者3:一名60岁的IIIB期宫颈癌患者,左侧大部分肿瘤。最小的卵泡不能适应拱顶,而串联和圆柱形不能提供足够的剂量覆盖,特别是对左侧。仅插入一串卵圆和左卵圆,左侧为间质丝。所有3例患者均成功完成近距离化疗,HRCTV D90 EQD2 >85Gy, OARs剂量正常。结论我们找到了一种创新的方法,在保持常规治疗原则的同时,在传统的应用器插入之外,为这些患者提供近距离治疗。患者能够在保留正常器官的情况下接受足够剂量的HRCTV。需要进一步的研究来评估这些患者的毒性和生存。宫颈癌是博茨瓦纳最常见的放射治疗癌症。全国只有一个直线加速器和一个HDR近距离治疗单位,每年治疗宫颈癌病例的中位数为200例。其中约80%以治疗为目的,使用同步放化疗和近距离强化治疗。博茨瓦纳的病人通常病情严重,肿瘤很大。传统上,不能接受近距离治疗的患者会接受外部光束增强治疗。这不仅增加了非常繁忙的单一Linac的负担,而且还损害了患者的预后。我们在这里强调7例新的插入患者谁将被认为不符合近距离治疗。我们回顾性整理了2023年1月接受近距离放疗的宫颈癌患者的记录,共29例。近距离放射治疗在外部放射治疗的最后一周进行,或在大肿瘤完成后进行。平均年龄为46岁,大多数患者(22.76%)表现为IIB期或IIIB期,6例患者因IB期疾病接受了子宫切除术。可使用的涂抹器有串联和卵形,串联和环形,串联和圆柱形,以及子宫切除术后的圆柱形。12名患者(41%)需要间质性针头。然而,7名患者(24%)先前被认为不适合使用这些涂抹器进行近距离治疗,原因如下:体积大的疾病,对外部光束近距离治疗反应差(3例)。2. 宫颈被抹去或破坏,穹窿后EBRT出现空化,传统的串联和圆柱不适合(3例)。拱顶最小卵泡狭窄不能适应,串联和圆柱不能给大体积肿瘤足够的剂量(1例)。我们成功地使用三种非传统的方法来完成近距离治疗,使用可用的涂敷器来治疗7名被认为不符合近距离治疗条件的患者。图1所示。以这种方式治疗的7名患者中有3名的图像。患者1:55岁,局部病变大,对EBRT反应差。第55天,质量仍然很大;未能插入传统仪器。我们只插入串联和间质丝,没有卵圆。患者2:一名42岁的IIB期宫颈癌患者。子宫颈在外部光束辐射后被完全破坏,然后在拱顶处形成了一个小洞。无明显残留病变。先置入宫内双柱,再置入一个2cm的小圆筒,再置入三个3.5cm的圆筒。患者3:一名60岁的IIIB期宫颈癌患者,左侧大部分肿瘤。最小的卵泡不能适应拱顶,而串联和圆柱形不能提供足够的剂量覆盖,特别是对左侧。仅插入一串卵圆和左卵圆,左侧为间质丝。所有3例患者均成功完成近距离化疗,HRCTV D90 EQD2 >85Gy, OARs剂量正常。我们发现了创新的方法,在传统的应用器插入之外,为这些患者提供近距离治疗,同时保持一般的治疗原则。患者能够在保留正常器官的情况下接受足够剂量的HRCTV。需要进一步的研究来评估这些患者的毒性和生存。 宫颈被抹去或破坏,穹窿后EBRT出现空化,传统的串联和圆柱不适合(3例)。拱顶最小卵泡狭窄不能适应,串联和圆柱不能给大体积肿瘤足够的剂量(1例)。我们成功地使用三种非传统的方法来完成近距离治疗,使用可用的涂敷器来治疗7名被认为不符合近距离治疗条件的患者。图1所示。以这种方式治疗的7名患者中有3名的图像。患者1:55岁,局部病变大,对EBRT反应差。第55天,质量仍然很大;未能插入传统仪器。我们只插入串联和间质丝,没有卵圆。患者2:一名42岁的IIB期宫颈癌患者。子宫颈在外部光束辐射后被完全破坏,然后在拱顶处形成了一个小洞。无明显残留病变。先置入宫内双柱,再置入一个2cm的小圆筒,再置入三个3.5cm的圆筒。患者3:一名60岁的IIIB期宫颈癌患者,左侧大部分肿瘤。最小的卵泡不能适应拱顶,而串联和圆柱形不能提供足够的剂量覆盖,特别是对左侧。仅插入一串卵圆和左卵圆,左侧为间质丝。所有3例患者均成功完成近距离化疗,HRCTV D90 EQD2 >85Gy, OARs剂量正常。我们发现了创新的方法,在传统的应用器插入之外,为这些患者提供近距离治疗,同时保持一般的治疗原则。患者能够在保留正常器官的情况下接受足够剂量的HRCTV。需要进一步的研究来评估这些患者的毒性和生存。
{"title":"PO44","authors":"Memory Fadziso Bvochora-Nsingo, Rohini Bhatia, Elliphine Gwangwava, Thabiso Itshabeng, Surbhi Grover","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.145","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Cervical cancer is the most common cancer treated with radiation in Botswana. There is a single linear accelerator and a single HDR brachytherapy unit in the country, treating a median of 200 cervical cancer cases year. About 80% of these are treated with curative intent, using concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost. Patients in Botswana often present with advanced disease and very bulky tumours. Traditionally, patients who can not have brachytherapy are sent for external beam boost. This not only adds burden onto the very busy single Linac, but also outcomes of patients are compromised. We highlight here seven cases with novel insertions for patients who would have been deemed ineligible for brachytherapy. Materials and Methods We retrospectively revised the records of cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy in January 2023, 29 in total. Brachytherapy was delivered in the final week of external beam radiation, or after completion for bulky tumours. The mean age was 46 years and most patients (22, 76%) presented with stage IIB or IIIB, six patients had undergone hysterectomy for stage IB disease. Applicators available were tandem and ovoids, tandem and ring, tandem and cylinder, and cylinder post hysterectomy. Twelve patients (41%) needed interstitial needles. However, seven patients(24%) would previously have been deemed unsuitable for brachytherapy with these applicators due to: 1. Bulky disease with poor response to external beam brachytherapy (three patients). 2. Effaced or destroyed cervix and cavitation at vault post EBRT, traditional tandem and cylinder would not fit (three patients) 3. Stenosis at vault smallest ovoids could not fit and tandem and cylinder would not give adequate dose to bulky tumour (one patient). Results We successfully used three non-conventional methods to complete brachytherapy using available applicators, to treat the 7 patients who would have been deemed ineligible for brachytherapy. Fig. 1. illustrates images from three of the seven patients treated this way. Patient 1: A 55 year old patient with bulky local disease and poor response to EBRT. On day 55, mass still bulky; failed to insert traditional instruments. We inserted tandem and interstitial wires only with no ovoids. Patient 2: A 42 year old patient with stage IIB cancer of the cervix. Cervix had been completely destroyed post external beam radiation, which then created a small cavity at the vault. No gross residual disease. An intrauterine tandem was inserted, then a small (2cm) cylinder was placed into the vault cavity, followed by three 3.5cm cylinders. Patient 3: A 60 year old patient with Stage IIIB cancer of the cervix with bulk of tumour on the left.The smallest ovoids could not fit at the vault, yet tandem and cylinder would not give enough dose coverage especially to the left. A tandem and left ovoid only were inserted, with interstitial wires on the left. All three patients managed to complete radical chemo radiatio","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO80 PO80
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.181
Juan Wang, Zezhou Liu, Yansong Liang, Jinxin Zhao, Huiming Yu, Hongtao Zhang, Ke Xu
Purpose To explore the value of modified intraoperative real-time 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. Method We collected 26 lymph nodes metastases patients, who received 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to December 2021. 13 patients procedure were guided by modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan, and the rest were guided by conventional treatment plan. To compare the differences of the dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan of the 2 groups, and the percentage difference of the dosimetric parameters between the 2 groups. Then evaluate the curative effect and side effects after 6-month. Result There were no significant differences in dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan in modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group, and showed significant differences in V150between pre-plan and post-plan in conventional treatment plan group(z=-3.045,P<0.001), and the rest dosimetric parameters of conventional treatment plan group showed no significant differences beforeand after operation(P>0.05). The percentage difference of V150 between the 2 groups showed statistically significant(z=2.103 ,P=0.004), and the rest dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences(P>0.05).6 months after the brachytherapy, the effective rate of Modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group was 77%(10/13), and 46%(6/13) in Conventional treatment plan group, and no peritonitis and hemorrhage were observed. Conclusion The application of modified real-time planning improved accuracy of dosimetric, reduced the high dose rate area, and provide guarantee for 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. To explore the value of modified intraoperative real-time 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. We collected 26 lymph nodes metastases patients, who received 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to December 2021. 13 patients procedure were guided by modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan, and the rest were guided by conventional treatment plan. To compare the differences of the dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan of the 2 groups, and the percentage difference of the dosimetric parameters between the 2 groups. Then evaluate the curative effect and side effects after 6-month. There were no significant differences in dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan in modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group, and showed significant differences in V150between pre-plan and post-plan in conventional treatment plan group(z=-3.045,P<0.001), and the rest dosimetric parameters of conventional treatment plan group showed no significant differences beforeand after operation(P>0.05). The percentage difference of V150 between the 2 groups showed statistically significant(z=2.103 ,P=0.004), and the rest dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences(P>0.05).6 months after the brachytherapy, the
目的探讨改良术中实时125I粒子植入方案在腰椎淋巴结转移中的应用价值。方法收集2015年1月至2021年12月行125I粒子植入的26例淋巴结转移患者。13例患者采用改良术中实时治疗方案,其余患者采用常规治疗方案。比较两组计划前后剂量学参数的差异,以及两组剂量学参数的百分比差异。6个月后评价疗效及不良反应。结果改良术中实时治疗方案组术前与术后剂量学参数差异无统计学意义,常规治疗方案组术前与术后v150差异有统计学意义(z=-3.045,P0.05)。两组间V150百分比差异有统计学意义(z=2.103,P=0.004),其余剂量学参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。近距离放疗后6个月,改良术中实时治疗方案组有效率为77%(10/13),常规治疗方案组有效率为46%(6/13),无腹膜炎及出血发生。结论改良实时计划的应用提高了剂量测定的准确性,减少了高剂量率区域,为腰椎淋巴结转移125I粒子植入计划提供了保障。探讨改良术中实时125I粒子植入方案在腰椎淋巴结转移中的应用价值。我们收集了26例淋巴结转移患者,于2015年1月至2021年12月接受了125I粒子植入。13例患者采用改良术中实时治疗方案,其余患者采用常规治疗方案。比较两组计划前后剂量学参数的差异,以及两组剂量学参数的百分比差异。6个月后评价疗效及不良反应。改良术中实时治疗方案组前后剂量学参数差异无统计学意义,常规治疗方案组前后v150差异有统计学意义(z=-3.045,P0.05)。两组间V150百分比差异有统计学意义(z=2.103,P=0.004),其余剂量学参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。近距离放疗后6个月,改良术中实时治疗方案组有效率为77%(10/13),常规治疗方案组有效率为46%(6/13),无腹膜炎及出血发生。改进的实时计划的应用提高了剂量测定的准确性,减少了高剂量率区域,为腰椎淋巴结转移125I粒子植入计划提供了保障。
{"title":"PO80","authors":"Juan Wang, Zezhou Liu, Yansong Liang, Jinxin Zhao, Huiming Yu, Hongtao Zhang, Ke Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.181","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To explore the value of modified intraoperative real-time 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. Method We collected 26 lymph nodes metastases patients, who received 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to December 2021. 13 patients procedure were guided by modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan, and the rest were guided by conventional treatment plan. To compare the differences of the dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan of the 2 groups, and the percentage difference of the dosimetric parameters between the 2 groups. Then evaluate the curative effect and side effects after 6-month. Result There were no significant differences in dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan in modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group, and showed significant differences in V150between pre-plan and post-plan in conventional treatment plan group(z=-3.045,P<0.001), and the rest dosimetric parameters of conventional treatment plan group showed no significant differences beforeand after operation(P>0.05). The percentage difference of V150 between the 2 groups showed statistically significant(z=2.103 ,P=0.004), and the rest dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences(P>0.05).6 months after the brachytherapy, the effective rate of Modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group was 77%(10/13), and 46%(6/13) in Conventional treatment plan group, and no peritonitis and hemorrhage were observed. Conclusion The application of modified real-time planning improved accuracy of dosimetric, reduced the high dose rate area, and provide guarantee for 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. To explore the value of modified intraoperative real-time 125I seed implantation planning for lumbar lymph nodes metastases. We collected 26 lymph nodes metastases patients, who received 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to December 2021. 13 patients procedure were guided by modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan, and the rest were guided by conventional treatment plan. To compare the differences of the dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan of the 2 groups, and the percentage difference of the dosimetric parameters between the 2 groups. Then evaluate the curative effect and side effects after 6-month. There were no significant differences in dosimetric parameters between pre-plan and post-plan in modified intraoperative real-time treatment plan group, and showed significant differences in V150between pre-plan and post-plan in conventional treatment plan group(z=-3.045,P<0.001), and the rest dosimetric parameters of conventional treatment plan group showed no significant differences beforeand after operation(P>0.05). The percentage difference of V150 between the 2 groups showed statistically significant(z=2.103 ,P=0.004), and the rest dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences(P>0.05).6 months after the brachytherapy, the","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brachytherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1