首页 > 最新文献

Clinical colorectal cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Real-World Evidence on Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection of Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer. 左侧梗阻性结肠癌切除术后辅助化疗的真实世界证据。
IF 3.2 Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2025.09.002
Bobby Zamaray, Jan Willem B de Groot, Jeanin E van Hooft, Niels F M Kok, Peter D Siersema, Esther C J Consten, Pieter J Tanis, Henderik L van Westreenen

Background: Bowel obstruction is considered a poor prognostic factor in colon cancer. Therefore, these patients are generally treated with adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of the primary tumour. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II obstructive colon cancer, and the impact of bridge-to-surgery strategies are insufficiently known.

Methods: This was a nationwide cohort study of patients who underwent resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC) with curative intent in 75 hospitals between 2009 and 2016. Potential predictors for receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were included in a multivariable model. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), corrected for age, ASA-score, and 30-day postoperative complications, was determined using Cox regression analyses, with pTN stratification.

Results: Of 2151 included patients, 39.7% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Independent predictors of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were age, ASA score, pT and pN1-2 categories, and Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV postoperative complications, but not a bridge-to-surgery strategy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with better DFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72) and OS (HR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61) in the overall population. In pT3N0 LSOCC, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS or OS. In patients with pT4N0 LSOCC however, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS (HR: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.29-0.95) and OS (HR: 0.42, 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). No differences in DFS or OS were observed between patients who received single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy were found.

Conclusion: A bridge-to-surgery strategy did not influence adjuvant chemotherapy receipt in patients with LSOCC. Obstruction is considered a risk factor in stage II, but no survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is seen for the pT3N0 subgroup.

背景:肠梗阻被认为是结肠癌预后不良的因素。因此,这些患者通常在原发肿瘤切除后进行辅助化疗。然而,辅助化疗对II期梗阻性结肠癌的益处以及手术过渡策略的影响尚不清楚。方法:这是一项全国性的队列研究,研究对象是2009年至2016年间在75家医院接受左侧梗阻性结肠癌(LSOCC)切除术的患者。接受辅助化疗的潜在预测因素包括在多变量模型中。使用Cox回归分析和pTN分层确定辅助化疗对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响,校正年龄、asa评分和术后30天并发症。结果:2151例患者中,39.7%接受了辅助化疗。接受辅助化疗的独立预测因素是年龄、ASA评分、pT和pN1-2分类以及Clavien-Dindo III-IV级术后并发症,但不是手术前的桥梁策略。辅助化疗与总体人群中更好的DFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72)和OS (HR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61)独立相关。在pT3N0 LSOCC中,辅助化疗与DFS或OS无关。然而,在pT4N0 LSOCC患者中,辅助化疗与改善的DFS (HR: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.29-0.95)和OS (HR: 0.42, 95% CI, 0.20-0.86)相关。接受单药与双药化疗的患者在DFS或OS方面没有差异。结论:手术过渡策略不影响LSOCC患者的辅助化疗接受情况。梗阻被认为是II期的一个危险因素,但pT3N0亚组没有看到辅助化疗的生存益处。
{"title":"Real-World Evidence on Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection of Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer.","authors":"Bobby Zamaray, Jan Willem B de Groot, Jeanin E van Hooft, Niels F M Kok, Peter D Siersema, Esther C J Consten, Pieter J Tanis, Henderik L van Westreenen","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2025.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bowel obstruction is considered a poor prognostic factor in colon cancer. Therefore, these patients are generally treated with adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of the primary tumour. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II obstructive colon cancer, and the impact of bridge-to-surgery strategies are insufficiently known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide cohort study of patients who underwent resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC) with curative intent in 75 hospitals between 2009 and 2016. Potential predictors for receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were included in a multivariable model. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), corrected for age, ASA-score, and 30-day postoperative complications, was determined using Cox regression analyses, with pTN stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2151 included patients, 39.7% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Independent predictors of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were age, ASA score, pT and pN1-2 categories, and Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV postoperative complications, but not a bridge-to-surgery strategy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with better DFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72) and OS (HR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61) in the overall population. In pT3N0 LSOCC, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS or OS. In patients with pT4N0 LSOCC however, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS (HR: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.29-0.95) and OS (HR: 0.42, 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). No differences in DFS or OS were observed between patients who received single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A bridge-to-surgery strategy did not influence adjuvant chemotherapy receipt in patients with LSOCC. Obstruction is considered a risk factor in stage II, but no survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is seen for the pT3N0 subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145411037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical colorectal cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1