Bahareh Sorouri, Jessica Bernardin, Ariel Ignacio Favier, Kylea Rose Garces, John George McMullen, Rosa Maria McGuire
Microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature, representing a significant portion of global biodiversity and playing vital roles in ecosystem functions, biogeochemical cycles, and organismal health. The growing recognition of microbial importance and their potential to address ecological and global challenges has inspired a renewed interest and innovation in microbial ecology. This field has benefited immensely from sequencing technologies that allow scientists to explore diversity at scales previously unimaginable. While the rapid growth of the field has offered significant positive advancements and foreshadows promising potential, there are aspects that need careful consideration. New technology has led to exponential growth in available microbial data, yet not everyone has easy access to sequencing technology, data mining and analysis tools, or the time to acquire new skills. Thus, we are at a crossroads in ensuring that these resources are accessible for all, and that traditional methods of microbiology are still appreciated as tools to progress the field in meaningful ways. As early-career researchers, we want to raise these points as principles for shaping the future of microbial ecology. Here, we outline a vision for a more accessible, united, and responsible microbial ecology field, one with applications equipped to address the needs of both society and the environment. To democratize the field, we advocate to destigmatize microbes and increase awareness of their beneficial roles by integrating microbes into early education. We believe unity and collaboration among microbial ecologists, as well as with professionals and community members in other STEM fields, are essential for advancing the field. Data should be accessible and standardized for collaboration, and greater integration across disciplines is essential to address future ecological challenges effectively and innovatively. It is our responsibility to ensure that we are asking relevant research questions with the potential to engage with socio-environmental issues and prioritize sustainable practices. As a collective field, our research should strive to not only expand scientific knowledge but also support community resilience and policy-making for a sustainable future. Together, this vision will promote a more equitable, diverse, and collaborative future for microbial ecology; and has applications for the broader ecology field.
{"title":"Microbial ecology for all: A vision of accessibility, unity, and responsibility.","authors":"Bahareh Sorouri, Jessica Bernardin, Ariel Ignacio Favier, Kylea Rose Garces, John George McMullen, Rosa Maria McGuire","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70342","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature, representing a significant portion of global biodiversity and playing vital roles in ecosystem functions, biogeochemical cycles, and organismal health. The growing recognition of microbial importance and their potential to address ecological and global challenges has inspired a renewed interest and innovation in microbial ecology. This field has benefited immensely from sequencing technologies that allow scientists to explore diversity at scales previously unimaginable. While the rapid growth of the field has offered significant positive advancements and foreshadows promising potential, there are aspects that need careful consideration. New technology has led to exponential growth in available microbial data, yet not everyone has easy access to sequencing technology, data mining and analysis tools, or the time to acquire new skills. Thus, we are at a crossroads in ensuring that these resources are accessible for all, and that traditional methods of microbiology are still appreciated as tools to progress the field in meaningful ways. As early-career researchers, we want to raise these points as principles for shaping the future of microbial ecology. Here, we outline a vision for a more accessible, united, and responsible microbial ecology field, one with applications equipped to address the needs of both society and the environment. To democratize the field, we advocate to destigmatize microbes and increase awareness of their beneficial roles by integrating microbes into early education. We believe unity and collaboration among microbial ecologists, as well as with professionals and community members in other STEM fields, are essential for advancing the field. Data should be accessible and standardized for collaboration, and greater integration across disciplines is essential to address future ecological challenges effectively and innovatively. It is our responsibility to ensure that we are asking relevant research questions with the potential to engage with socio-environmental issues and prioritize sustainable practices. As a collective field, our research should strive to not only expand scientific knowledge but also support community resilience and policy-making for a sustainable future. Together, this vision will promote a more equitable, diverse, and collaborative future for microbial ecology; and has applications for the broader ecology field.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 3","pages":"e70342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13002350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147489066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
About half of all plant species rely on animals such as scatter-hoarding small mammals for seed dispersal. These plants include many keystone species for which small mammals are key primary and secondary dispersal agents as well as seed predators. To predict the regeneration and movement of such plant species, we must understand small mammal seed finding effectiveness, or how many seeds they find and how quickly they find them. The ability of small mammals to find seeds is a critical first step of the seed dispersal or predation process, upon which all other steps depend, but it has received relatively little attention. With a field experiment, we aimed to fill this gap, uncovering environmental, demographic, and intraspecific predictors of seed finding effectiveness. We assayed the behavior of 1296 southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) and 1053 deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) to identify and mark individuals with different personalities. Afterward, we established experimental seed stations with white pine (Pinus strobus) seeds and red oak (Quercus rubra) acorns scattered on the forest floor. We recorded the foraging behavior of 23 voles and 18 mice with known personality and assessed the effects of seed availability, environmental factors, small mammal density, and personality on their proportion of found seeds, seed finding rates, and probability of dispersing found seeds. More timid and docile voles found fewer white pine seeds and found them slower. Voles found more red oak acorns and found them more quickly when small mammal density was higher, and individual seed finding rates increased with white pine seed availability. At the community level, forest treatment and small mammal species richness influenced the number of found and removed seeds. These results contribute to identifying the factors that influence seed finding effectiveness, enhancing our understanding of this pivotal first step of seed predation and dispersal. We highlight the effect of personality on the quantity of found seeds and underscore the importance of considering behavioral diversity when predicting seed dispersal and predation rates.
{"title":"Intraspecific and environmental variation mediate seed finding effectiveness among scatter-hoarding small mammals.","authors":"Margaret R Merz, Sydne Record, Alessio Mortelliti","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>About half of all plant species rely on animals such as scatter-hoarding small mammals for seed dispersal. These plants include many keystone species for which small mammals are key primary and secondary dispersal agents as well as seed predators. To predict the regeneration and movement of such plant species, we must understand small mammal seed finding effectiveness, or how many seeds they find and how quickly they find them. The ability of small mammals to find seeds is a critical first step of the seed dispersal or predation process, upon which all other steps depend, but it has received relatively little attention. With a field experiment, we aimed to fill this gap, uncovering environmental, demographic, and intraspecific predictors of seed finding effectiveness. We assayed the behavior of 1296 southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) and 1053 deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) to identify and mark individuals with different personalities. Afterward, we established experimental seed stations with white pine (Pinus strobus) seeds and red oak (Quercus rubra) acorns scattered on the forest floor. We recorded the foraging behavior of 23 voles and 18 mice with known personality and assessed the effects of seed availability, environmental factors, small mammal density, and personality on their proportion of found seeds, seed finding rates, and probability of dispersing found seeds. More timid and docile voles found fewer white pine seeds and found them slower. Voles found more red oak acorns and found them more quickly when small mammal density was higher, and individual seed finding rates increased with white pine seed availability. At the community level, forest treatment and small mammal species richness influenced the number of found and removed seeds. These results contribute to identifying the factors that influence seed finding effectiveness, enhancing our understanding of this pivotal first step of seed predation and dispersal. We highlight the effect of personality on the quantity of found seeds and underscore the importance of considering behavioral diversity when predicting seed dispersal and predation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 3","pages":"e70312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147517835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dawn Lemke, Luben Dimov, Bill Finch, Patience Knight, Helen Czech, Loretta Weninegar, Richard Condit
<p><p>We present the initial woody stem census for the 20-ha Paint Rock Forest Dynamics Plot in 2019-2021 in north Alabama, USA. Our objectives were to improve our understanding of the ecology of the forest ecosystem, provide hands-on research experience to undergraduate students, create opportunities for collaboration with other disciplines, and monitor the dynamics of the forest. From its origin at the south corner (latitude: 34.769521°, longitude: -86.306079°), our plot is a rectangle of 400 m × 500 m, having its long side at 313° azimuth. The plot is in a mature mixed deciduous forest within the mountain district of the Cumberland Plateau physiographic region. It is within the Nature Conservancy Sharp Bingham Mountain Preserve (1600 ha). The Preserve is protected from broad anthropogenic disturbance, but allows limited hunting outside of the plot. The plot's climate is humid subtropical, with hot, humid summers and cool, wet winters. The plot is on a deeply dissected karst landscape with a sandstone cap overlaying several layers of limestone. The majority of the plot (95%) is limestone rockland rough soils that are well-drained with a parent material of residuum weathered from limestone. The remainder of the plot (5%) is Huntington silt loam, which occurs in the floodplains and toe slopes. The variable geology and topography offer a broad range of water availability, from dry benches to moist bottomland sinks, with steep to moderate slopes in between. Elevation ranges from 226 to 323 m above sea level. A 20 m × 20 m grid was professionally surveyed and installed across the 20 ha. Using this grid, we mapped and inventoried all living stems of woody plants (excluding vines) with a diameter of at least 1 cm at breast height. Trees with multiple stems were defined as those with aboveground forks off the main trunk, below breast height, at an angle <45° from the main stem, and having a diameter at least one-third of the main stem. Clonal trunks that were clearly connected below ground were also recorded as multiple-stemmed. Trees were mapped using a laser rangefinder with an internal digital compass, which measured the distance and azimuth from true north to the base of each tree from one corner of the 20 m × 20 m survey grid. These were converted to x-y coordinates. Our taxonomic nomenclature follows that of the PLANTS database online, the Flora of the Southeastern United States, and the Alabama Plant Atlas. The initial census enumerated 29,280 free-standing living stems from 27,418 woody individuals, including 79 species from 35 families. Among those were three gymnosperm and 46 angiosperm canopy stature trees (species that could potentially reach the canopy as free-standing trees), and 30 species of mid- or understory tree species and shrubs. Canopy stature tree species made up 74.5% of the stems. Dominant canopy trees include white oak (Quercus alba), yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), white ash (Fraxinus am
{"title":"Initial tree census for the Paint Rock Forest Dynamics Plot, Alabama, USA.","authors":"Dawn Lemke, Luben Dimov, Bill Finch, Patience Knight, Helen Czech, Loretta Weninegar, Richard Condit","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70348","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present the initial woody stem census for the 20-ha Paint Rock Forest Dynamics Plot in 2019-2021 in north Alabama, USA. Our objectives were to improve our understanding of the ecology of the forest ecosystem, provide hands-on research experience to undergraduate students, create opportunities for collaboration with other disciplines, and monitor the dynamics of the forest. From its origin at the south corner (latitude: 34.769521°, longitude: -86.306079°), our plot is a rectangle of 400 m × 500 m, having its long side at 313° azimuth. The plot is in a mature mixed deciduous forest within the mountain district of the Cumberland Plateau physiographic region. It is within the Nature Conservancy Sharp Bingham Mountain Preserve (1600 ha). The Preserve is protected from broad anthropogenic disturbance, but allows limited hunting outside of the plot. The plot's climate is humid subtropical, with hot, humid summers and cool, wet winters. The plot is on a deeply dissected karst landscape with a sandstone cap overlaying several layers of limestone. The majority of the plot (95%) is limestone rockland rough soils that are well-drained with a parent material of residuum weathered from limestone. The remainder of the plot (5%) is Huntington silt loam, which occurs in the floodplains and toe slopes. The variable geology and topography offer a broad range of water availability, from dry benches to moist bottomland sinks, with steep to moderate slopes in between. Elevation ranges from 226 to 323 m above sea level. A 20 m × 20 m grid was professionally surveyed and installed across the 20 ha. Using this grid, we mapped and inventoried all living stems of woody plants (excluding vines) with a diameter of at least 1 cm at breast height. Trees with multiple stems were defined as those with aboveground forks off the main trunk, below breast height, at an angle <45° from the main stem, and having a diameter at least one-third of the main stem. Clonal trunks that were clearly connected below ground were also recorded as multiple-stemmed. Trees were mapped using a laser rangefinder with an internal digital compass, which measured the distance and azimuth from true north to the base of each tree from one corner of the 20 m × 20 m survey grid. These were converted to x-y coordinates. Our taxonomic nomenclature follows that of the PLANTS database online, the Flora of the Southeastern United States, and the Alabama Plant Atlas. The initial census enumerated 29,280 free-standing living stems from 27,418 woody individuals, including 79 species from 35 families. Among those were three gymnosperm and 46 angiosperm canopy stature trees (species that could potentially reach the canopy as free-standing trees), and 30 species of mid- or understory tree species and shrubs. Canopy stature tree species made up 74.5% of the stems. Dominant canopy trees include white oak (Quercus alba), yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), white ash (Fraxinus am","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 3","pages":"e70348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147464515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Killian A Gregory, Charlotte Francesiaz, Jean-Yves Barnagaud, Pierre-André Crochet, Jean-Dominique Lebreton, Aurélien Besnard, Julien Papaïx
The dynamics of spatially structured populations (SSPs) depend on dispersal movements between habitat patches. Individual-level studies show that dispersal can be informed by social cues about habitat quality, such as breeding success or the number of conspecifics in a patch. However, informed dispersal has rarely been considered in studies investigating SSP dynamics. In particular, little is known about how patch dynamics are influenced by characteristics of neighboring patches, and the spatial scale of this influence. Here, we used occupancy and growth rate models to investigate the effect of breeding success and numbers in all patches of an SSP of black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) on patch colonization, persistence and growth rates. The spatial scale of influence of neighboring patches was estimated using a distance decay function weighting the effect of patch covariates. Our results showed a strong influence of breeding success and breeding numbers, both in the focal patch and in neighboring patches, on patch dynamics. Persistence was higher for patches occupied by large and successful colonies, suggesting high attractiveness of such colonies, although their growth rate was reduced, probably due to increased costs of group-living. Patch colonization rates were higher within a few kilometers from patches occupied by large and successful colonies, in accordance with an attraction of dispersers to areas showing favorable breeding conditions. The breeding success of neighboring patches from the entire SSP reduced patch persistence, but only for patches that failed to produce chicks, and negatively affected the growth rate of persisting colonies, consistent with individuals moving away towards higher quality habitats. These results advocate for the use of social information in black-headed gull dispersal decisions. However, we were unable to distinguish between the use of breeding success (public information) and breeding numbers (conspecific attraction), which were highly correlated. Our findings emphasize the need to consider neighboring patches as dynamic components of the landscape that actively shape dispersal decisions, with consequences on SSP dynamics.
{"title":"Social cues from neighboring patches influence patch dynamics in a spatially structured population of a colonial bird.","authors":"Killian A Gregory, Charlotte Francesiaz, Jean-Yves Barnagaud, Pierre-André Crochet, Jean-Dominique Lebreton, Aurélien Besnard, Julien Papaïx","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dynamics of spatially structured populations (SSPs) depend on dispersal movements between habitat patches. Individual-level studies show that dispersal can be informed by social cues about habitat quality, such as breeding success or the number of conspecifics in a patch. However, informed dispersal has rarely been considered in studies investigating SSP dynamics. In particular, little is known about how patch dynamics are influenced by characteristics of neighboring patches, and the spatial scale of this influence. Here, we used occupancy and growth rate models to investigate the effect of breeding success and numbers in all patches of an SSP of black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) on patch colonization, persistence and growth rates. The spatial scale of influence of neighboring patches was estimated using a distance decay function weighting the effect of patch covariates. Our results showed a strong influence of breeding success and breeding numbers, both in the focal patch and in neighboring patches, on patch dynamics. Persistence was higher for patches occupied by large and successful colonies, suggesting high attractiveness of such colonies, although their growth rate was reduced, probably due to increased costs of group-living. Patch colonization rates were higher within a few kilometers from patches occupied by large and successful colonies, in accordance with an attraction of dispersers to areas showing favorable breeding conditions. The breeding success of neighboring patches from the entire SSP reduced patch persistence, but only for patches that failed to produce chicks, and negatively affected the growth rate of persisting colonies, consistent with individuals moving away towards higher quality habitats. These results advocate for the use of social information in black-headed gull dispersal decisions. However, we were unable to distinguish between the use of breeding success (public information) and breeding numbers (conspecific attraction), which were highly correlated. Our findings emphasize the need to consider neighboring patches as dynamic components of the landscape that actively shape dispersal decisions, with consequences on SSP dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 3","pages":"e70349"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147517770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding how parasites spread is crucial for preventing infections and predicting epidemic dynamics. These efforts are challenging for environment-borne parasites because transmission is host density-independent. We monitored the dynamics of Pasteuria ramosa, a common bacterial parasite of Daphnia magna with prolonged free-living transmission stages (spores). Spores are released into the sediment from decaying host cadavers. Transmission is believed to happen from sediment to host, though recent work has challenged this assumption, suggesting that transmission may also happen in the water column. We collected water samples during an epidemic and found infectious spore levels in the water, thus confirming this transmission pathway. Water column infectivity correlated with epidemic dynamics, suggesting that this pathway contributes to disease dynamics. We demonstrated experimentally that spores have a low sedimentation rate, suggesting that once suspended in the water, they remain in suspension for extended periods. We excluded that spores are released in the free water through macroinvertebrate predation or decomposition of sinking dead Daphnia, thus suggesting that perturbation transfers spores from the sediment to the water, potentially by water birds and large zooplankton. This research contributes insights into the transmission of environment-borne parasites, emphasizing the importance of considering the physical environment and ecological community.
{"title":"Waterborne transmission largely contributes to the epidemiology of a plankton parasite.","authors":"Christina P Tadiri, Dieter Ebert","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70334","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how parasites spread is crucial for preventing infections and predicting epidemic dynamics. These efforts are challenging for environment-borne parasites because transmission is host density-independent. We monitored the dynamics of Pasteuria ramosa, a common bacterial parasite of Daphnia magna with prolonged free-living transmission stages (spores). Spores are released into the sediment from decaying host cadavers. Transmission is believed to happen from sediment to host, though recent work has challenged this assumption, suggesting that transmission may also happen in the water column. We collected water samples during an epidemic and found infectious spore levels in the water, thus confirming this transmission pathway. Water column infectivity correlated with epidemic dynamics, suggesting that this pathway contributes to disease dynamics. We demonstrated experimentally that spores have a low sedimentation rate, suggesting that once suspended in the water, they remain in suspension for extended periods. We excluded that spores are released in the free water through macroinvertebrate predation or decomposition of sinking dead Daphnia, thus suggesting that perturbation transfers spores from the sediment to the water, potentially by water birds and large zooplankton. This research contributes insights into the transmission of environment-borne parasites, emphasizing the importance of considering the physical environment and ecological community.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 3","pages":"e70334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-25DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0230
A. Kamath
Territoriality is a foundational concept in animal behavior and behavioral ecology. Territoriality is commonly defined as “the defense of an area,” wherein the area being defended is known as the “territory.” Territoriality serves as a framework that allows animal behaviorists and behavioral ecologists to describe and hypothesize links among diverse aspects of animals’ biology. The many facets and functions of territoriality include the acquisition of food, nest sites, and shelter, space-use and movement behavior, and interactions with mates and competitors. Thus, because territoriality encompasses behaviors that directly determine individuals’ survival and reproduction (i.e., their fitness), it offers a powerful approach to understanding the evolution of animal behavior. Territoriality has been used to describe animal behavior for many centuries, particularly in avian systems; conversely, many advances in how biologists conceive of and use territoriality have arisen in research on birds. Operational definitions of territory fall broadly into two categories—those that focus on animals’ behavior and those that focus on their ecological relationships. That said, the question of how to conceive of territory has long been a subject of contention, with widely varied opinions on how the term should be defined and whether and how it is useful for understanding animal behavior. Discussions and critiques of territoriality, from not only animal behavior and behavioral ecology but also from the social sciences, help to contextualize and sharpen how we use the concept to understand the evolution of animal behavior. Technological and statistical advances continue to change the ways in which territories are mapped and quantified, with different methods available for taxa of different sizes, habitats, and life histories. Research on territoriality can be divided into two large domains based on the function served by territory—foraging and mating—but these two functions are intimately linked through the socioecological hypothesis that proposes a relationship between resource distributions and mating systems. This hypothesis has served to structure much research on territoriality in the last half-century or so. Finally, territoriality is pertinent not just to within-species interactions but also to between-species interactions and species coexistence, with implications for macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns and processes.
{"title":"Territoriality","authors":"A. Kamath","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0230","url":null,"abstract":"Territoriality is a foundational concept in animal behavior and behavioral ecology. Territoriality is commonly defined as “the defense of an area,” wherein the area being defended is known as the “territory.” Territoriality serves as a framework that allows animal behaviorists and behavioral ecologists to describe and hypothesize links among diverse aspects of animals’ biology. The many facets and functions of territoriality include the acquisition of food, nest sites, and shelter, space-use and movement behavior, and interactions with mates and competitors. Thus, because territoriality encompasses behaviors that directly determine individuals’ survival and reproduction (i.e., their fitness), it offers a powerful approach to understanding the evolution of animal behavior. Territoriality has been used to describe animal behavior for many centuries, particularly in avian systems; conversely, many advances in how biologists conceive of and use territoriality have arisen in research on birds. Operational definitions of territory fall broadly into two categories—those that focus on animals’ behavior and those that focus on their ecological relationships. That said, the question of how to conceive of territory has long been a subject of contention, with widely varied opinions on how the term should be defined and whether and how it is useful for understanding animal behavior. Discussions and critiques of territoriality, from not only animal behavior and behavioral ecology but also from the social sciences, help to contextualize and sharpen how we use the concept to understand the evolution of animal behavior. Technological and statistical advances continue to change the ways in which territories are mapped and quantified, with different methods available for taxa of different sizes, habitats, and life histories. Research on territoriality can be divided into two large domains based on the function served by territory—foraging and mating—but these two functions are intimately linked through the socioecological hypothesis that proposes a relationship between resource distributions and mating systems. This hypothesis has served to structure much research on territoriality in the last half-century or so. Finally, territoriality is pertinent not just to within-species interactions but also to between-species interactions and species coexistence, with implications for macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns and processes.","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141220878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}